If you are finanically independant you can seek out who you "work" with. That should be the aspiration of every scientist, your only there as everyone is nice and curious, as soon as the environment is cut throat, ruthess or toxic then you just disappear.
You guys really should post a warning that these lectures are really addictive. People should know coming in that they could be spending the next several hours watching RI videos.
It's an inside joke. TVTropes is a website that is highly addictive (even more so than these RI videos) and whenever someone posts a link to a TVT article it's common to reply with something along the lines of 'there goes the rest of my day' or the like.
I now understand more about accelerators than I ever did before. Very interesting and explanatory. I had no idea there were so many accelerators in existence, and what uses they are put to, having only seen the large ones at RAL before.
What a lovely lady! Such enthusiasm and passion for her subject. I learnt a lot watching this discourse and thanks for the humour, even if it was geeky! :)
Great talk. I really enjoyed listening to you bring back memories. You are in an exciting field with great potential for the future. Keep up with your good work! As a young engineer working in my employer's Super Power Lab my first job was to take a 10 foot section of an "S-band" linear accelerator and marry it to a high power crossed field amplifier in a single vacuum for a medical application. I went on from that application to design high power microwave tubes for military radar and industrial applications. Later I led a group for over two decades working on high power industrial microwave designs for many applications in the food, foundry, ceramics, nuclear waste remediation, medical sterilization, and even power beaming to name just a few. I hope you are still at it and wish you the very best.
Excellent talk, both in the sense of the content and the speaker. No surprise that she’s an Oxonian through and through, as this was excellent. One of the very best RI talks I’ve seen.
In Texas, we saw the possibility of a super-duper collider become a financial fizzle. Thus life beyond the CERN is hard to shake out of the coin purses of governments. It's interesting to see that more types of useful accelerators are possible that won't consume all the money in all the nations of the world. Sheehy's talk should be required viewing for our legislators.
If you want a good book to read about that debacle, check out Tunnel Visions (www.amazon.com/Tunnel-Visions-Superconducting-Super-Collider/dp/022629479X)... you would be surprised how this has been 'required reading' for other Science Projects in the U.S. and elsewhere.
To me, unless you get into being lazy with social management of large populations because of the refusal to provide value added programming for mass and energy management... these particle accelerators systems seem delusional grandiose strange to invest in without more distributed, secured and I think even placed underground, underwater or on barges nuclear power plants. Seems strange the gaps in physics, engineering and actual implementations when we have more feasible implementations that can be energy efficient and even use more heat from solar not being implemented for the masses. Say for nuclear... to not waste water or to refine sea water... why aren't novel investments in desalination of sea water at nuclear power plants or even external combustion generation at nuclear power plants explored for say solar concentrating trough power stations hybrid designs where we don't require to waste water? Seem mentally ill to me some days the inconsiderate to our constituents implementations not being implemented to bring costs down for higher quality survival requirements at extreme population densities and these delusional forensically clean killing systems for grandiose, delusional, narcissists that have some insane cult mission. Maybe I am missing something to comprehend why? What are the actual milestones they are trying to determine that will aid for practical applications to the masses other than radiating people to death with systems that we know are not as effective as others that we know are?
More than beauty, the mind matters: I.e. Carl Sagan and Jacob Bronowski where quite ugly for me, but amazing. Hannah has a sharp and clear speech and is funny! Alice Roberts is beautiful.
Wow, impressive, very impressive. Practical applications, and solutions to problems encountered in developing new technology, a result of coupling "thinking outside of the box" with a thorough understanding of the physics. I look forward to reading about what Ms. Sheehy discovers and creates over the next decade and more.
Wonderful lectures, and this is another. Informative, communicative, and welcoming to the uninitiated - at least most of them. Love it when real scientists present real science.
Was it just me or was anyone else nervous when she put the foam ball on the rotating saddle (e.g. at 34:41)? The scariest was when she put it at full power at 35:40. They should call it the widow-maker.
I think i just fell in love. A beautiful and intelligent lady, working in science, beeing really excited about it and she has humour! How awesome (And sadly rare) is that? :) And yes, these videos are addictive! I work in chemistry and love learning stuff about physics like this.
Yes, the British seem to have of late developed an especial talent for mistaking their love of kaleidescopes for a love of science, but I still love them anyway, لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا ٱلله مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ ٱلله
My responses to these videos may be late, but I feel somebody somewhere might appreciate them so here I go; Thanks for the BRILLIANT presentation. I spent a while thinking "Oh particle accelerator, I get it", but you've realy demonstrated great depth that I must have been previously missing, as that's the only way to explain the racing thoughts this video gave me. Miniature accelerators, suuuper sized orbital accelerators, from medicine to magic.
The audience is always a bit dull at the royal institution... :C You can sometimes see it in the lecturers, when their joy dies, and they just give the lecture go get it over with. I think this one was really good!
+felixthecrazy There is nothing funny about a ten billion dollar accelerator that creates a particle which disappears a billionth of a second after the (proton) collision. Aye, there is tremendous amount of data that came came about, and the fizzisists can study it for decades! For six figure salaries...
youcanfoolmeonce I agree. Just imagine all the stone axes and deer hides we could have bought for that money! We could have afforded not to kill of our elderly for a winter or two, perhaps we could even hold a great feast to honour the Great Orange One, to ensure bountiful hunts for years to come? My family could have had enough sea shells to pay the mortgage on our cave, instead of having to sell three of my siblings to Othvar Man-eater...
About the problem with charged particles interacting with each other in a particle beam and therefore pushing each other apart and defocusing the beam -- has anyone ever tried running negatively and positively charged particles or ions in the same beam in a circular accelerator? They would presumably rotate in opposite directions. Would the presence, and intermixing, of negative and positive particles in the two intersecting beams improve their focus?
It was a very interesting talk, but I had trouble understanding the resonance graph at 37:30 can someone break it down for me? Is she trying to show that 2.5 is the ideal value to reach for both vertical and horizontal oscillations?
Dr. Sheely, have you considered augmenting your Paul trap design together with the motivating force of a Cyclotron? IOW use a synchronized electric charge to attenuate the attractive (counter-containment force) of the alternating magnetic fields.
The analogy of the complex resonances is that your various instruments now become an orchestra and you have to figure out how to make the tubas work with the violins to make music (your desired acceleration without problems) and not noise. You need a Mozart to do this...
There is some lost energy (particles) when a beam is coaxed in more than one direction at once. Meaning in a Zed Vector? Or, are you saying the entire beam is lost if you change the algebra of the curve to bend in an additional direction?
Try ionic ACCharged pyramids and repulsion by neg energy double helix field resonance. On one side of earth flow goes one direction down a drain opposite upon the other side of the equator. Directly down on the equator into the drain. This resonance is reactive to relationships. I
I will freely admit that I clicked on this link because I saw a pretty lady wearing a mic. She's got a great accent and she has the crucial ability to simplify complex ideas. When she got to the part about resonance, I immediately remembered a commercial featuring Ella Fitzgerald's voice shattering a wine glass.
A) I need her in my life haha! B) Awesome lecture; I hate when PhDs sometimes dumb things down, but I'm so glad she didn't. You don't give a lecture at the RI and dumb things down. She was interesting, witty, enthusiastic, obviously intelligent... Bravo. I learnt a lot from her talk. I'll be checking out a few more of her vids I reckon :P
I understand very little about the newer generations of particles, but I'm curious if the muon is a heavier form of an electron, couldn't we use it in a fashion to transfer more electrical energy? Just a shot in the dark, if I'm misunderstanding the generational steps, please forgive me. This lecture was very interesting and fun, a spark if you will, thank you very much!
Super interesting. I had no idea about all the current practical applications. As far as my ideas of future applications that she spoke of in her closing, I can only believe that they will be of ideas only found in science fiction at the present.
A very educational video, I often see it. Also I appeal to people please don't post vulgar and sexist comments. She is a scientist and just because she is a woman we should not slander her we should be proud of her and support her with constructive feedback
Hi, i was watching a video on lathe work, and how resonant can ruin surface finish, but constantly accelerating and de accelerating the RPM would help. That might work on the turntable model too, you mentioned experiment similar in the video but to be honest i didn't that part
All right everything is focused on increasing specific energy of the beam but what about the application of the accelerator as propulsion a mean for lowering entropy as it's time to phase out the internal combustion engine technology old almost two centuries
Can the Paul trap be compared to the conical scan radar tracker, where you use the low-power null at the exact center of the beam by cocking the power beam slightly off at an angle and rotating the antenna to make this beam rapidly go round the central axis, which can be very small, allowing very tight tracking of a target?
We could simply build the World's Greatest Linear Accelerator between Texas and California, and then just let 'certain people' *think* it's a WALL.....(!)
LOL hyper loop linear accelerator to aid humans in genetic development smash to groups of people together to get a supertior new race of home spaien evulcian
Amazing lecture, I really enjoyed the theory of magnetic fields oscillating with induced electromagnetic' to give an avalanche type of effect to the particles in a cavity, If these could be strung together in such a way that increased energy is applied to the particles. Is this the idea being put forward to increase the energy output, have I understood what is being proposed.
Can an accelerated proton beam be created into a Bose Einstein Condensate, of even a low number of protons, thus overcoming the mutual Coulomb force? Something like the electron pairs in superconducting circuits. Or would all of the protons’ positive charges be somehow altered so that the proton packet could not be controlled? So, fewer protons but better aimed and more dense thus achieving a satisfactory collision rate. Where is the positive charge in a ‘plasma’ of nucleons made of protons and neutrons inside an atom’s nucleus? Could the quark/gluon and virtual q/g flux be studied better if beams of light weight element ions were collided?
Bose-Einstein condensates happen at extremely low energies; the opposite of what's going on inside a particle accelerator. They're also generally made with somewhat heavy atoms like rubidium, rather than bare protons, hydrogen atoms, helium atoms, etc.
It seems the most obvious & logical explanation for a #particle acting like an #AxialWave when moving thru space is that it's orbiting something (a dark matter particle perhaps) or visa versa. It's not unlike Earth being pulled into a wobble by the moon, or a distant star's wobble evidencing planet orbits making our trajectory as we fly thru space have an axial wave (packet) as well. And since we think we know undetectable dark matter exists but don't yet know where it's distributed, this seems the most logical possibility. What do you think? This could explain the double slit experiment results, including with a detector with some interaction between the dark matter and the detector.
wow! respect! i was shouting out when she showed us the rotating sattle thingy: yes! that is physics! it explains it suddendly! it made me so happy today! :)
There is no reason why a particle accelerator couldn't be reduced to a small size and the particles accelerated faster and faster in the same loop then diverted from their cyclic path when reaching the desired velocity. Calling the Universe 'pretty massive' is bit of an understatement when the known observed universe is utterly gargantuan on a scale barely conceivable in distance.
These talks are more entertaining than anything you can find on television . If science was favoured over celebrity society would be all the more richer
this is a great talk, much better than the ri usual. She's not dumbing it down too much and she has a concrete story to tell. On the other hand, it's hard for me to focus on all the details and the overall ideas. But that's not a problem, I can rewatch it. If I were in the auditorium, I would leave frustrated because of my stupidity.
Huh. So you're saying you can't understand it on a first run-through (and no, these lectures aren't supposed to need re-watching to understand), and yet you criticise other RI lectures because they "dumb down" their subject matter. Right. If you can't understand the lecture, you can't judge whether it's any good or not, btw, although thank you for pointing out how problematic and contradictory your own opinions are. You're certainly right about your own stupidity. Might want to work on that.
I wonder what the beam cross sections / diameters are (average in storage rings, not in lenses or experiment halls) or diameters are of the 1MW class machines. Designing beam dumps for those must be fun. O_O
The platter used to spin the demo quadrupole trap is out of balance. The unit is beautifully built so I expect it didn't start that way. With all the smart people in the room I'm sure it can be repaired.
Study interfering with the magnets. Get Goggles deep blue to work out how the winding of wires of brass mixed with some mercury interlineated or interlocking interlaced interphased and bolts of brass shot through the windings and lead steel wood. A wooden bolt like a telephone poll but made out of compress cedar but ONLY with the knots of the tree as the raw material and some binding agent. Also with wormy chestnut and redwood. DB will spit out like a million different ways you can bend an energy beam. Then build a a two figure 8 shaped loop that has been twisted over itself enough to stack vertically and drill giant deep bore holes around the perimeter filled with wave absorbing material that will divert waves travelling across the top of the ground into energy transferred into them to damping seismic interference. Save a 100km of digging.
The cyclotron at TRIUMF will continue to be important in the coming years due to its exceptionally bright proton beam and the ability to accelerate rare isotopes.
I love how she laughs at things which only a small number of people would find funny. Very endearing quality and shows how brilliant she is.
If you are finanically independant you can seek out who you "work" with. That should be the aspiration of every scientist, your only there as everyone is nice and curious, as soon as the environment is cut throat, ruthess or toxic then you just disappear.
You guys really should post a warning that these lectures are really addictive. People should know coming in that they could be spending the next several hours watching RI videos.
go check the Tvtropes article on that effect.
:p
thekaxmax
link?
It's an inside joke. TVTropes is a website that is highly addictive (even more so than these RI videos) and whenever someone posts a link to a TVT article it's common to reply with something along the lines of 'there goes the rest of my day' or the like.
Applications: medicine, energy, creating and destroying entire universes. You know, just another waste of tax payer money.
Would recommend looking into the many university channels available!
Honestly, her voice is gold...her jokes disarming and it makes me feel great every time I hear it.
At 14:12 She grounds out the high voltage charge.You don't want to forget and yes these videos are addictive! TY
Thank you for posting these lectures. They are amazing!
Ri has some of the best lectures i've found!
completely agree, i finally getting what i always wanted on UA-cam it is a learning resource for me im im good with that for now
This is THE BEST lecture I've ever had the pleasure to listen to. Really top-notch!
I now understand more about accelerators than I ever did before. Very interesting and explanatory. I had no idea there were so many accelerators in existence, and what uses they are put to, having only seen the large ones at RAL before.
What a lovely lady! Such enthusiasm and passion for her subject. I learnt a lot watching this discourse and thanks for the humour, even if it was geeky! :)
Making others a compliment means you're a pervert now? What?
@@DemoniteBL Smart people are attractive to all of us, that is our nature.
@@DemoniteBL geeky is the new sexy!
It's fun to imagine what Meitner, Curie, Rutherford, and Thomson would have to say if they could listen to Ms Sheehy's talk.
K M
This is like Ted but without being shit.
TED is quite good. TEDx, on the other hand, is kind of amateur night.
She is sexy
I wanna marry her
Great talk. I really enjoyed listening to you bring back memories. You are in an exciting field with great potential for the future. Keep up with your good work! As a young engineer working in my employer's Super Power Lab my first job was to take a 10 foot section of an
"S-band" linear accelerator and marry it to a high power crossed field amplifier in a single vacuum for a medical application. I went on from that application to design high power microwave tubes for military radar and industrial applications. Later I led a group for over two decades working on high power industrial microwave designs for many applications in the food, foundry, ceramics, nuclear waste remediation, medical sterilization, and even power beaming to name just a few. I hope you are still at it and wish you the very best.
Excellent talk, both in the sense of the content and the speaker. No surprise that she’s an Oxonian through and through, as this was excellent. One of the very best RI talks I’ve seen.
This lady is a great example for our young people. Just inspiring .
In Texas, we saw the possibility of a super-duper collider become a financial fizzle. Thus life beyond the CERN is hard to shake out of the coin purses of governments. It's interesting to see that more types of useful accelerators are possible that won't consume all the money in all the nations of the world. Sheehy's talk should be required viewing for our legislators.
If you want a good book to read about that debacle, check out Tunnel Visions (www.amazon.com/Tunnel-Visions-Superconducting-Super-Collider/dp/022629479X)... you would be surprised how this has been 'required reading' for other Science Projects in the U.S. and elsewhere.
Book: "No device can generate energy in excess of the total energy put into constructing it".
the-fifth-law.com/pages/press-release
And this year, a new crop of imbeciles voted 10x as much to *add* to the military budget -- they added as much as Russia's total expenditures. Sheesh.
To me, unless you get into being lazy with social management of large populations because of the refusal to provide value added programming for mass and energy management... these particle accelerators systems seem delusional grandiose strange to invest in without more distributed, secured and I think even placed underground, underwater or on barges nuclear power plants. Seems strange the gaps in physics, engineering and actual implementations when we have more feasible implementations that can be energy efficient and even use more heat from solar not being implemented for the masses. Say for nuclear... to not waste water or to refine sea water... why aren't novel investments in desalination of sea water at nuclear power plants or even external combustion generation at nuclear power plants explored for say solar concentrating trough power stations hybrid designs where we don't require to waste water?
Seem mentally ill to me some days the inconsiderate to our constituents implementations not being implemented to bring costs down for higher quality survival requirements at extreme population densities and these delusional forensically clean killing systems for grandiose, delusional, narcissists that have some insane cult mission. Maybe I am missing something to comprehend why? What are the actual milestones they are trying to determine that will aid for practical applications to the masses other than radiating people to death with systems that we know are not as effective as others that we know are?
as a texan i was pissed
I've watched this about 300 times and I love it, it's beautiful😊
Sure BBC will pick Suzie for documentaries. Pleasant presentation, not too heavy.
More than beauty, the mind matters: I.e. Carl Sagan and Jacob Bronowski where quite ugly for me, but amazing. Hannah has a sharp and clear speech and is funny! Alice Roberts is beautiful.
4:00 In the words of my favorite scientist, in responding to the question, "But what use are they?" "What use is a new born baby?"
@Heads Mess Well, it can be food, or if your lucky, a teaching tool.
Wow, impressive, very impressive. Practical applications, and solutions to problems encountered in developing new technology, a result of coupling "thinking outside of the box" with a thorough understanding of the physics. I look forward to reading about what Ms. Sheehy discovers and creates over the next decade and more.
"Get the particles, give them some energy, bend them around the corner. Done. NO!" xD
Love it.
I could listen to Suzies voice for the rest of my life.
I wouldn't need to listen, just watch her lips moving :D
Listen to this woman also: Sophie Ellis-Bextor
Wonderful lectures, and this is another. Informative, communicative, and welcoming to the uninitiated - at least most of them. Love it when real scientists present real science.
I like the way she shares her knowledge with the audience. She makes it look so easy.
Goodness, her voice is so relaxing while also maintaining my attention.
Give Suzie a big budget and make her the face of modern physics. Brian Green,Cox,Tyson,and the rest could use the competition!
17:05 400MHz != 400x a second
edit: okay, one moment later she said it correctly ^^
Excellent! Very informative and interesting. Thank you RI and Dr. Sheehy.
Was it just me or was anyone else nervous when she put the foam ball on the rotating saddle (e.g. at 34:41)? The scariest was when she put it at full power at 35:40. They should call it the widow-maker.
Yeah, the camera angle made it look a lot worse than it was.
Another person genuinely amazed by this intelligent and unique person 👌 being true to yourself is the only way you'll never lose-
This woman won the genetic lottery.
Wow! What an utterly useless statement...
@@muffty1337 what fun is life when you can't make the occasional pointless observation?
@@muffty1337 Still upset you didn't?
Are you sure you wrote what you meant?
@@muffty1337 Ironic
lol (26:10) those guys working at ISIS must have a great time at airports.
This is a awesome channel and I'm very thankful they post these vids, let alone for free. It's a beautiful thing.
I think i just fell in love. A beautiful and intelligent lady, working in science, beeing really excited about it and she has humour! How awesome (And sadly rare) is that? :)
And yes, these videos are addictive! I work in chemistry and love learning stuff about physics like this.
I second that (y)
Marketing, not science; she cute tho
I feel the same. :_)
Yes, the British seem to have of late developed an especial talent for mistaking their love of kaleidescopes for a love of science, but I still love them anyway, لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا ٱلله مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ ٱلله
why are they mistaking? If you do it the right way a love of pretty any kind can be ''love of science, i guess.
My responses to these videos may be late, but I feel somebody somewhere might appreciate them so here I go;
Thanks for the BRILLIANT presentation. I spent a while thinking "Oh particle accelerator, I get it", but you've realy demonstrated great depth that I must have been previously missing, as that's the only way to explain the racing thoughts this video gave me. Miniature accelerators, suuuper sized orbital accelerators, from medicine to magic.
10/10 talk. You've enlightened me to the world of particle accelerators.
She Explains Her Work So Thoroughly... Her Laugh Is Super Cute To!👍😊
What a great communicator! Wish to hear more from her!
I love how she has written in all these moments of things she finds legitimately humorous, but kind of fall flat on the audience.
The audience is always a bit dull at the royal institution... :C You can sometimes see it in the lecturers, when their joy dies, and they just give the lecture go get it over with.
I think this one was really good!
You'll love this then...
What's the presenters name?
Gesundheit!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahaha hahaha haha ha no?
+felixthecrazy There is nothing funny about a ten billion dollar accelerator that creates a particle which disappears a billionth of a second after the (proton) collision. Aye, there is tremendous amount of data that came came about, and the fizzisists can study it for decades! For six figure salaries...
+Thomas Anderson (Neo?):
Attention Span?
What use is a brain, if you can't think?
;-)
youcanfoolmeonce I agree. Just imagine all the stone axes and deer hides we could have bought for that money! We could have afforded not to kill of our elderly for a winter or two, perhaps we could even hold a great feast to honour the Great Orange One, to ensure bountiful hunts for years to come? My family could have had enough sea shells to pay the mortgage on our cave, instead of having to sell three of my siblings to Othvar Man-eater...
This kinda of knowledge just available for practically free just blows my mind!!
About the problem with charged particles interacting with each other in a particle beam and therefore pushing each other apart and defocusing the beam -- has anyone ever tried running negatively and positively charged particles or ions in the same beam in a circular accelerator? They would presumably rotate in opposite directions. Would the presence, and intermixing, of negative and positive particles in the two intersecting beams improve their focus?
Great to see Aussie physicists contributing to great things abroad.
17:00 - 17:09 400MHz is 400 Million oscillations per second not 400 oscillations per second. Otherwise interesting talk.
NDT freq? 17-05 was destroyed. But the 787 Flew as a graphite tube. Why is there carbon fiber in the vax? [Just asking 5G] I have asteroids!
A bit of CERN HUMOR...
nice primer for me on topic yet do not fear getting to technical i have a lot of prerequisites on topic
There are so much similarities and same mechanisms and apparatus used in both particle accelerators and mass spectrometers i use in chemical analysis.
At 17:04, mentioned 400 MHz saying that's 400 times per second, but should have said 400 million times per second. She corrected it at 17:20 though.
GREAT COMMENT.
Excellent!! I am sending this to my daughter as an inspirational video.
שלום
It was a very interesting talk, but I had trouble understanding the resonance graph at 37:30 can someone break it down for me? Is she trying to show that 2.5 is the ideal value to reach for both vertical and horizontal oscillations?
At 11minutes was at the Fermi lab awhile back. Super amazing.
Dr. Sheely, have you considered augmenting your Paul trap design together with the motivating force of a Cyclotron? IOW use a synchronized electric charge to attenuate the attractive (counter-containment force) of the alternating magnetic fields.
The analogy of the complex resonances is that your various instruments now become an orchestra and you have to figure out how to make the tubas work with the violins to make music (your desired acceleration without problems) and not noise. You need a Mozart to do this...
There is some lost energy (particles) when a beam is coaxed in more than one direction at once. Meaning in a Zed Vector? Or, are you saying the entire beam is lost if you change the algebra of the curve to bend in an additional direction?
talk nerdy to me
Try ionic ACCharged pyramids and repulsion by neg energy double helix field resonance. On one side of earth flow goes one direction down a drain opposite upon the other side of the equator. Directly down on the equator into the drain. This resonance is reactive to relationships. I
Susan Sheehy is further proof that STEM girls rock! We need more of them.
I will freely admit that I clicked on this link because I saw a pretty lady wearing a mic. She's got a great accent and she has the crucial ability to simplify complex ideas. When she got to the part about resonance, I immediately remembered a commercial featuring Ella Fitzgerald's voice shattering a wine glass.
I would add statically charge energy from lambs hairs and glass rods or curved glass sheets and spacers to static ballance.
38:30 I would bet, just based on our relative intelligence that her guess would be better than mine.
A) I need her in my life haha!
B) Awesome lecture; I hate when PhDs sometimes dumb things down, but I'm so glad she didn't. You don't give a lecture at the RI and dumb things down. She was interesting, witty, enthusiastic, obviously intelligent... Bravo. I learnt a lot from her talk. I'll be checking out a few more of her vids I reckon :P
الشكر الجزيل للعالِمة والقناة الناشرة
Alternating gradient at 32:00!
I understand very little about the newer generations of particles, but I'm curious if the muon is a heavier form of an electron, couldn't we use it in a fashion to transfer more electrical energy? Just a shot in the dark, if I'm misunderstanding the generational steps, please forgive me. This lecture was very interesting and fun, a spark if you will, thank you very much!
Perfect and pleasing one.....many many thanks Suize
Super interesting. I had no idea about all the current practical applications. As far as my ideas of future applications that she spoke of in her closing, I can only believe that they will be of ideas only found in science fiction at the present.
Thumbnail 10/10 and lecture 11/10
A truly excellent speaker and lovely manner. More women like her are needed as STEM role models for young women.
A very educational video, I often see it. Also I appeal to people please don't post vulgar and sexist comments. She is a scientist and just because she is a woman we should not slander her we should be proud of her and support her with constructive feedback
Another excellent and informative presentation... CERN, geniuses...very worthwhile research...
Amazingly performed. I became infatuated with it all.
Especially marvelous presentation...enlightening. Thankyou.
Hi, i was watching a video on lathe work, and how resonant can ruin surface finish, but constantly accelerating and de accelerating the RPM would help.
That might work on the turntable model too, you mentioned experiment similar in the video but to be honest i didn't that part
All right everything is focused on increasing specific energy of the beam but what about the application of the accelerator as propulsion a mean for lowering entropy as it's time to phase out the internal combustion engine technology old almost two centuries
Can the Paul trap be compared to the conical scan radar tracker, where you use the low-power null at the exact center of the beam by cocking the power beam slightly off at an angle and rotating the antenna to make this beam rapidly go round the central axis, which can be very small, allowing very tight tracking of a target?
Is proton-beam decay acceleration necessary for nuclear waste recycling in a Thorium reactor if you use a Molten Salt Reactor (MSR)?
How can someone dislike this
A deep explanation
We could simply build the World's Greatest Linear Accelerator between Texas and California, and then just let 'certain people' *think* it's a WALL.....(!)
And you would proof the Earth is not flat at the same time!!!
You are talking about Hyberloop. :)
LOL hyper loop linear accelerator to aid humans in genetic development smash to groups of people together to get a supertior new race of home spaien evulcian
please post the concept to the White House Washington DC USA; & thank you it's a wonderful idea !
And the price might ultimately be less than a wall. Show financial benefits and the administration might go for it.
Amazing lecture, I really enjoyed the theory of magnetic fields oscillating with induced electromagnetic' to give an avalanche type of effect to the particles in a cavity, If these could be strung together in such a way that increased energy is applied to the particles. Is this the idea being put forward to increase the energy output, have I understood what is being proposed.
Can an accelerated proton beam be created into a Bose Einstein Condensate, of even a low number of protons, thus overcoming the mutual Coulomb force? Something like the electron pairs in superconducting circuits. Or would all of the protons’ positive charges be somehow altered so that the proton packet could not be controlled? So, fewer protons but better aimed and more dense thus achieving a satisfactory collision rate. Where is the positive charge in a ‘plasma’ of nucleons made of protons and neutrons inside an atom’s nucleus? Could the quark/gluon and virtual q/g flux be studied better if beams of light weight element ions were collided?
Bose-Einstein condensates happen at extremely low energies; the opposite of what's going on inside a particle accelerator. They're also generally made with somewhat heavy atoms like rubidium, rather than bare protons, hydrogen atoms, helium atoms, etc.
It seems the most obvious & logical explanation for a #particle acting like an #AxialWave when moving thru space is that it's orbiting something (a dark matter particle perhaps) or visa versa.
It's not unlike Earth being pulled into a wobble by the moon, or a distant star's wobble evidencing planet orbits making our trajectory as we fly thru space have an axial wave (packet) as well.
And since we think we know undetectable dark matter exists but don't yet know where it's distributed, this seems the most logical possibility. What do you think?
This could explain the double slit experiment results, including with a detector with some interaction between the dark matter and the detector.
I'm sorry but from what I know everything you said is largely nonsense.
What theory do you believe best explains wave particle duality for example?
One of the DSLR cameras used for filming has so many dead pixels that it contaminates the image quite noticeably.
wow! respect! i was shouting out when she showed us the rotating sattle thingy: yes! that is physics! it explains it suddendly! it made me so happy today! :)
There is no reason why a particle accelerator couldn't be reduced to a small size and the particles accelerated faster and faster in the same loop then diverted from their cyclic path when reaching the desired velocity. Calling the Universe 'pretty massive' is bit of an understatement when the known observed universe is utterly gargantuan on a scale barely conceivable in distance.
Studied about. The working applications technology and particle physics in accelerator
17:08
she caught her slip on 400 mil times a second
Way over my head, but impressive and enchanting.
Inverted DOME = Free Energy = What to the Fear Most? People Knowing [35]
I grew up in Burbank, Illinois, about 40 miles from Fermilab.
Great! I love this channel.
me too its straight up educational and i love youtube more than ever im all about understanding i have questions
She should have been my physics teacher at my high school...
Definitely not! You wouldn’t have been able to write. You right hand would be constantly busy, school boy.
I would never have skipped that class, and would have listened raptly.
These talks are more entertaining than anything you can find on television . If science was favoured over celebrity society would be all the more richer
I dumped my cable tv service - have internet only now
this is a great talk, much better than the ri usual. She's not dumbing it down too much and she has a concrete story to tell. On the other hand, it's hard for me to focus on all the details and the overall ideas. But that's not a problem, I can rewatch it. If I were in the auditorium, I would leave frustrated because of my stupidity.
Huh. So you're saying you can't understand it on a first run-through (and no, these lectures aren't supposed to need re-watching to understand), and yet you criticise other RI lectures because they "dumb down" their subject matter. Right.
If you can't understand the lecture, you can't judge whether it's any good or not, btw, although thank you for pointing out how problematic and contradictory your own opinions are.
You're certainly right about your own stupidity. Might want to work on that.
28:00 Jedi Knight Suzie Sheehy makes a mock-up of a light-saber
I never thought I'd see a resonance cascade.
pretty interesting talk :)
I wonder what the beam cross sections / diameters are (average in storage rings, not in lenses or experiment halls) or diameters are of the 1MW class machines. Designing beam dumps for those must be fun. O_O
What a brilliant video this was. Thanks
The platter used to spin the demo quadrupole trap is out of balance. The unit is beautifully built so I expect it didn't start that way. With all the smart people in the room I'm sure it can be repaired.
Number of atoms in the human body is about 10^27. Number of stars in the observable universe is about 10^24
Study interfering with the magnets. Get Goggles deep blue to work out how the winding of wires of brass mixed with some mercury interlineated or interlocking interlaced interphased and bolts of brass shot through the windings and lead steel wood. A wooden bolt like a telephone poll but made out of compress cedar but ONLY with the knots of the tree as the raw material and some binding agent. Also with wormy chestnut and redwood. DB will spit out like a million different ways you can bend an energy beam. Then build a a two figure 8 shaped loop that has been twisted over itself enough to stack vertically and drill giant deep bore holes around the perimeter filled with wave absorbing material that will divert waves travelling across the top of the ground into energy transferred into them to damping seismic interference. Save a 100km of digging.
sweet!
Love that this starts off with New Zealand (Rutherford) :-)
The cyclotron at TRIUMF will continue to be important in the coming years due to its exceptionally bright proton beam and the ability to accelerate rare isotopes.