Particle Accelerators Reimagined - with Suzie Sheehy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 490

  • @erictaylor5462
    @erictaylor5462 8 років тому +496

    You guys really should post a warning that these lectures are really addictive. People should know coming in that they could be spending the next several hours watching RI videos.

    • @thekaxmax
      @thekaxmax 8 років тому +8

      go check the Tvtropes article on that effect.
      :p

    • @erictaylor5462
      @erictaylor5462 8 років тому +2

      thekaxmax
      link?

    • @suntoritime
      @suntoritime 8 років тому +12

      It's an inside joke. TVTropes is a website that is highly addictive (even more so than these RI videos) and whenever someone posts a link to a TVT article it's common to reply with something along the lines of 'there goes the rest of my day' or the like.

    • @TheChuchurocket
      @TheChuchurocket 7 років тому +7

      Applications: medicine, energy, creating and destroying entire universes. You know, just another waste of tax payer money.

    • @AvatarOfBhaal
      @AvatarOfBhaal 5 років тому +2

      Would recommend looking into the many university channels available!

  • @brentwalker8596
    @brentwalker8596 5 років тому +82

    I love how she laughs at things which only a small number of people would find funny. Very endearing quality and shows how brilliant she is.

    • @ronpearson1912
      @ronpearson1912 3 місяці тому

      If you are finanically independant you can seek out who you "work" with. That should be the aspiration of every scientist, your only there as everyone is nice and curious, as soon as the environment is cut throat, ruthess or toxic then you just disappear.

  • @TheEVEInspiration
    @TheEVEInspiration 6 років тому +43

    Honestly, her voice is gold...her jokes disarming and it makes me feel great every time I hear it.

  • @bobd5119
    @bobd5119 7 років тому +43

    It's fun to imagine what Meitner, Curie, Rutherford, and Thomson would have to say if they could listen to Ms Sheehy's talk.

  • @jackpullen3820
    @jackpullen3820 8 років тому +14

    At 14:12 She grounds out the high voltage charge.You don't want to forget and yes these videos are addictive! TY

  • @Enonymouse_
    @Enonymouse_ 5 років тому +20

    Ri has some of the best lectures i've found!

    • @sirvapalot
      @sirvapalot 4 роки тому +3

      completely agree, i finally getting what i always wanted on UA-cam it is a learning resource for me im im good with that for now

  • @satkin
    @satkin 8 років тому +8

    I now understand more about accelerators than I ever did before. Very interesting and explanatory. I had no idea there were so many accelerators in existence, and what uses they are put to, having only seen the large ones at RAL before.

  • @antonleimbach648
    @antonleimbach648 7 років тому +46

    Thank you for posting these lectures. They are amazing!

  • @AntoniGawlikowski
    @AntoniGawlikowski 4 роки тому +10

    This is THE BEST lecture I've ever had the pleasure to listen to. Really top-notch!

  • @theflyingfool
    @theflyingfool 8 років тому +59

    What a lovely lady! Such enthusiasm and passion for her subject. I learnt a lot watching this discourse and thanks for the humour, even if it was geeky! :)

    • @DemoniteBL
      @DemoniteBL 7 років тому +1

      Making others a compliment means you're a pervert now? What?

    • @pdr.
      @pdr. 4 роки тому +3

      @@DemoniteBL Smart people are attractive to all of us, that is our nature.

    • @jeffreyjaystein
      @jeffreyjaystein 3 роки тому +1

      @@DemoniteBL geeky is the new sexy!

  • @richardedgar2783
    @richardedgar2783 3 роки тому +2

    Great talk. I really enjoyed listening to you bring back memories. You are in an exciting field with great potential for the future. Keep up with your good work! As a young engineer working in my employer's Super Power Lab my first job was to take a 10 foot section of an
    "S-band" linear accelerator and marry it to a high power crossed field amplifier in a single vacuum for a medical application. I went on from that application to design high power microwave tubes for military radar and industrial applications. Later I led a group for over two decades working on high power industrial microwave designs for many applications in the food, foundry, ceramics, nuclear waste remediation, medical sterilization, and even power beaming to name just a few. I hope you are still at it and wish you the very best.

  • @ObeySilence
    @ObeySilence 7 років тому +152

    This is like Ted but without being shit.

    • @RFC3514
      @RFC3514 6 років тому +8

      TED is quite good. TEDx, on the other hand, is kind of amateur night.

    • @codebulletin
      @codebulletin 5 років тому +1

      She is sexy

    • @codebulletin
      @codebulletin 5 років тому +1

      I wanna marry her

  • @erictaylor5462
    @erictaylor5462 8 років тому +11

    4:00 In the words of my favorite scientist, in responding to the question, "But what use are they?" "What use is a new born baby?"

    • @erictaylor5462
      @erictaylor5462 4 роки тому

      @Heads Mess Well, it can be food, or if your lucky, a teaching tool.

  • @jenko701
    @jenko701 8 років тому +5

    This lady is a great example for our young people. Just inspiring .

  • @ruimartins2615
    @ruimartins2615 8 років тому +7

    Sure BBC will pick Suzie for documentaries. Pleasant presentation, not too heavy.

    • @ruimartins2615
      @ruimartins2615 8 років тому +7

      More than beauty, the mind matters: I.e. Carl Sagan and Jacob Bronowski where quite ugly for me, but amazing. Hannah has a sharp and clear speech and is funny! Alice Roberts is beautiful.

  • @AlphaNumeric123
    @AlphaNumeric123 4 роки тому +10

    Excellent talk, both in the sense of the content and the speaker. No surprise that she’s an Oxonian through and through, as this was excellent. One of the very best RI talks I’ve seen.

  • @johnhathorn2743
    @johnhathorn2743 7 років тому +23

    In Texas, we saw the possibility of a super-duper collider become a financial fizzle. Thus life beyond the CERN is hard to shake out of the coin purses of governments. It's interesting to see that more types of useful accelerators are possible that won't consume all the money in all the nations of the world. Sheehy's talk should be required viewing for our legislators.

    • @MerrimanDevonshire
      @MerrimanDevonshire 7 років тому

      If you want a good book to read about that debacle, check out Tunnel Visions (www.amazon.com/Tunnel-Visions-Superconducting-Super-Collider/dp/022629479X)... you would be surprised how this has been 'required reading' for other Science Projects in the U.S. and elsewhere.

    • @sunroad7228
      @sunroad7228 7 років тому

      Book: "No device can generate energy in excess of the total energy put into constructing it".
      the-fifth-law.com/pages/press-release

    • @ericpmoss
      @ericpmoss 7 років тому +4

      And this year, a new crop of imbeciles voted 10x as much to *add* to the military budget -- they added as much as Russia's total expenditures. Sheesh.

    • @jafinch78
      @jafinch78 7 років тому

      To me, unless you get into being lazy with social management of large populations because of the refusal to provide value added programming for mass and energy management... these particle accelerators systems seem delusional grandiose strange to invest in without more distributed, secured and I think even placed underground, underwater or on barges nuclear power plants. Seems strange the gaps in physics, engineering and actual implementations when we have more feasible implementations that can be energy efficient and even use more heat from solar not being implemented for the masses. Say for nuclear... to not waste water or to refine sea water... why aren't novel investments in desalination of sea water at nuclear power plants or even external combustion generation at nuclear power plants explored for say solar concentrating trough power stations hybrid designs where we don't require to waste water?
      Seem mentally ill to me some days the inconsiderate to our constituents implementations not being implemented to bring costs down for higher quality survival requirements at extreme population densities and these delusional forensically clean killing systems for grandiose, delusional, narcissists that have some insane cult mission. Maybe I am missing something to comprehend why? What are the actual milestones they are trying to determine that will aid for practical applications to the masses other than radiating people to death with systems that we know are not as effective as others that we know are?

    • @CarterColeisInfamous
      @CarterColeisInfamous 6 років тому

      as a texan i was pissed

  • @jordiewalters871
    @jordiewalters871 6 років тому +4

    I've watched this about 300 times and I love it, it's beautiful😊

  • @Houmer
    @Houmer 5 років тому +16

    I could listen to Suzies voice for the rest of my life.

    • @dkathrens77
      @dkathrens77 4 роки тому +1

      I wouldn't need to listen, just watch her lips moving :D

    • @turkerozturk6889
      @turkerozturk6889 3 роки тому +1

      Listen to this woman also: Sophie Ellis-Bextor

  • @GodlikeIridium
    @GodlikeIridium 4 роки тому +7

    "Get the particles, give them some energy, bend them around the corner. Done. NO!" xD
    Love it.

  • @TuckaBuck89
    @TuckaBuck89 3 роки тому +1

    Wow, impressive, very impressive. Practical applications, and solutions to problems encountered in developing new technology, a result of coupling "thinking outside of the box" with a thorough understanding of the physics. I look forward to reading about what Ms. Sheehy discovers and creates over the next decade and more.

  • @mikeschatz9153
    @mikeschatz9153 6 років тому +7

    Give Suzie a big budget and make her the face of modern physics. Brian Green,Cox,Tyson,and the rest could use the competition!

  • @pedrovelazquez138
    @pedrovelazquez138 8 років тому

    I like the way she shares her knowledge with the audience. She makes it look so easy.

  • @defeatSpace
    @defeatSpace 2 роки тому

    Goodness, her voice is so relaxing while also maintaining my attention.

  • @Dr10Jeeps
    @Dr10Jeeps 5 років тому +11

    Excellent! Very informative and interesting. Thank you RI and Dr. Sheehy.

  • @rhov233
    @rhov233 6 років тому +5

    What a great communicator! Wish to hear more from her!

  • @ctdieselnut
    @ctdieselnut 2 роки тому

    This is a awesome channel and I'm very thankful they post these vids, let alone for free. It's a beautiful thing.

  • @GordonjSmith1
    @GordonjSmith1 7 років тому +5

    Wonderful lectures, and this is another. Informative, communicative, and welcoming to the uninitiated - at least most of them. Love it when real scientists present real science.

  • @jayyyzeee6409
    @jayyyzeee6409 7 років тому +4

    Was it just me or was anyone else nervous when she put the foam ball on the rotating saddle (e.g. at 34:41)? The scariest was when she put it at full power at 35:40. They should call it the widow-maker.

    • @PongoXBongo
      @PongoXBongo 7 років тому

      Yeah, the camera angle made it look a lot worse than it was.

  • @raenayers815
    @raenayers815 Рік тому

    My responses to these videos may be late, but I feel somebody somewhere might appreciate them so here I go;
    Thanks for the BRILLIANT presentation. I spent a while thinking "Oh particle accelerator, I get it", but you've realy demonstrated great depth that I must have been previously missing, as that's the only way to explain the racing thoughts this video gave me. Miniature accelerators, suuuper sized orbital accelerators, from medicine to magic.

  • @felixthecrazy
    @felixthecrazy 8 років тому +82

    I love how she has written in all these moments of things she finds legitimately humorous, but kind of fall flat on the audience.

    • @xorboy
      @xorboy 7 років тому +8

      The audience is always a bit dull at the royal institution... :C You can sometimes see it in the lecturers, when their joy dies, and they just give the lecture go get it over with.
      I think this one was really good!

    • @TheDruidKing
      @TheDruidKing 7 років тому +1

      You'll love this then...
      What's the presenters name?
      Gesundheit!
      Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahaha hahaha haha ha no?

    • @youcanfoolmeonce
      @youcanfoolmeonce 7 років тому

      +felixthecrazy There is nothing funny about a ten billion dollar accelerator that creates a particle which disappears a billionth of a second after the (proton) collision. Aye, there is tremendous amount of data that came came about, and the fizzisists can study it for decades! For six figure salaries...

    • @RogerBarraud
      @RogerBarraud 7 років тому

      +Thomas Anderson (Neo?):
      Attention Span?
      What use is a brain, if you can't think?
      ;-)

    • @gunnargrautnes4451
      @gunnargrautnes4451 7 років тому +31

      youcanfoolmeonce I agree. Just imagine all the stone axes and deer hides we could have bought for that money! We could have afforded not to kill of our elderly for a winter or two, perhaps we could even hold a great feast to honour the Great Orange One, to ensure bountiful hunts for years to come? My family could have had enough sea shells to pay the mortgage on our cave, instead of having to sell three of my siblings to Othvar Man-eater...

  • @shaneavion4390
    @shaneavion4390 2 роки тому

    Another person genuinely amazed by this intelligent and unique person 👌 being true to yourself is the only way you'll never lose-

  • @orp0piru
    @orp0piru 7 років тому +31

    lol (26:10) those guys working at ISIS must have a great time at airports.

  • @AntiProtonBoy
    @AntiProtonBoy 6 років тому

    Great to see Aussie physicists contributing to great things abroad.

  • @tomcrockett7941
    @tomcrockett7941 4 роки тому

    At 11minutes was at the Fermi lab awhile back. Super amazing.

  • @bokchoiman
    @bokchoiman 3 роки тому

    10/10 talk. You've enlightened me to the world of particle accelerators.

  • @ethorii
    @ethorii 6 років тому +65

    This woman won the genetic lottery.

    • @muffty1337
      @muffty1337 4 роки тому +4

      Wow! What an utterly useless statement...

    • @ethorii
      @ethorii 4 роки тому +10

      @@muffty1337 what fun is life when you can't make the occasional pointless observation?

    • @AndrewSkow1
      @AndrewSkow1 4 роки тому +3

      @@muffty1337 Still upset you didn't?

    • @seitbekir
      @seitbekir 4 роки тому +1

      Are you sure you wrote what you meant?

    • @ASLUHLUHC3
      @ASLUHLUHC3 3 роки тому +1

      @@muffty1337 Ironic

  • @NathanOkun
    @NathanOkun 5 років тому

    The analogy of the complex resonances is that your various instruments now become an orchestra and you have to figure out how to make the tubas work with the violins to make music (your desired acceleration without problems) and not noise. You need a Mozart to do this...

  • @slowburntm3584
    @slowburntm3584 4 роки тому

    This kinda of knowledge just available for practically free just blows my mind!!

  • @JohnDoe_1237
    @JohnDoe_1237 8 років тому +10

    17:05 400MHz != 400x a second
    edit: okay, one moment later she said it correctly ^^

  • @robadams5799
    @robadams5799 2 роки тому

    I will freely admit that I clicked on this link because I saw a pretty lady wearing a mic. She's got a great accent and she has the crucial ability to simplify complex ideas. When she got to the part about resonance, I immediately remembered a commercial featuring Ella Fitzgerald's voice shattering a wine glass.

  • @ronaldjorgensen6839
    @ronaldjorgensen6839 Рік тому +1

    nice primer for me on topic yet do not fear getting to technical i have a lot of prerequisites on topic

  • @vikingsoftpaw
    @vikingsoftpaw 6 років тому +5

    Susan Sheehy is further proof that STEM girls rock! We need more of them.

  • @Sc0ttPrian
    @Sc0ttPrian Рік тому +1

    I never thought I'd see a resonance cascade.

  • @erictaylor5462
    @erictaylor5462 8 років тому +5

    38:30 I would bet, just based on our relative intelligence that her guess would be better than mine.

  • @GodlikeIridium
    @GodlikeIridium 7 років тому

    There are so much similarities and same mechanisms and apparatus used in both particle accelerators and mass spectrometers i use in chemical analysis.

  • @fleXcope
    @fleXcope 8 років тому +23

    She should have been my physics teacher at my high school...

    • @crabcrab2024
      @crabcrab2024 4 роки тому +1

      Definitely not! You wouldn’t have been able to write. You right hand would be constantly busy, school boy.

    • @infidel6728
      @infidel6728 4 роки тому

      I would never have skipped that class, and would have listened raptly.

  • @mitzvahgolem8366
    @mitzvahgolem8366 8 років тому +4

    Excellent!! I am sending this to my daughter as an inspirational video.
    שלום

  • @jono.7350
    @jono.7350 8 років тому +13

    She Explains Her Work So Thoroughly... Her Laugh Is Super Cute To!👍😊

  • @GodlikeIridium
    @GodlikeIridium 7 років тому +37

    I think i just fell in love. A beautiful and intelligent lady, working in science, beeing really excited about it and she has humour! How awesome (And sadly rare) is that? :)
    And yes, these videos are addictive! I work in chemistry and love learning stuff about physics like this.

    • @siwilson1437
      @siwilson1437 7 років тому +2

      I second that (y)

    • @abubatatu3241
      @abubatatu3241 6 років тому +2

      Marketing, not science; she cute tho

    • @3679god
      @3679god 6 років тому +1

      I feel the same. :_)

    • @abubatatu3241
      @abubatatu3241 6 років тому

      Yes, the British seem to have of late developed an especial talent for mistaking their love of kaleidescopes for a love of science, but I still love them anyway, لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا ٱلله مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ ٱلله

    • @3679god
      @3679god 6 років тому +1

      why are they mistaking? If you do it the right way a love of pretty any kind can be ''love of science, i guess.

  • @mohannadwazwaz5111
    @mohannadwazwaz5111 Рік тому

    الشكر الجزيل للعالِمة والقناة الناشرة

  • @Serotonindude
    @Serotonindude 2 роки тому

    wow! respect! i was shouting out when she showed us the rotating sattle thingy: yes! that is physics! it explains it suddendly! it made me so happy today! :)

  • @robert8124
    @robert8124 Рік тому

    Another excellent and informative presentation... CERN, geniuses...very worthwhile research...

  • @fuffoon
    @fuffoon 6 років тому

    Super interesting. I had no idea about all the current practical applications. As far as my ideas of future applications that she spoke of in her closing, I can only believe that they will be of ideas only found in science fiction at the present.

  • @AGAMTV108
    @AGAMTV108 7 років тому +1

    Perfect and pleasing one.....many many thanks Suize

  • @hamradio3716
    @hamradio3716 2 роки тому

    A truly excellent speaker and lovely manner. More women like her are needed as STEM role models for young women.

  • @electrospank
    @electrospank 6 років тому +1

    The platter used to spin the demo quadrupole trap is out of balance. The unit is beautifully built so I expect it didn't start that way. With all the smart people in the room I'm sure it can be repaired.

  • @DanceAffectionist
    @DanceAffectionist 8 років тому +7

    One of the DSLR cameras used for filming has so many dead pixels that it contaminates the image quite noticeably.

  • @mjtonyfire
    @mjtonyfire 7 років тому +2

    A) I need her in my life haha!
    B) Awesome lecture; I hate when PhDs sometimes dumb things down, but I'm so glad she didn't. You don't give a lecture at the RI and dumb things down. She was interesting, witty, enthusiastic, obviously intelligent... Bravo. I learnt a lot from her talk. I'll be checking out a few more of her vids I reckon :P

  • @101virtualtours
    @101virtualtours Рік тому

    Amazingly performed. I became infatuated with it all.

  • @miashinbrot8388
    @miashinbrot8388 2 роки тому

    About the problem with charged particles interacting with each other in a particle beam and therefore pushing each other apart and defocusing the beam -- has anyone ever tried running negatively and positively charged particles or ions in the same beam in a circular accelerator? They would presumably rotate in opposite directions. Would the presence, and intermixing, of negative and positive particles in the two intersecting beams improve their focus?

  • @koori3085
    @koori3085 2 роки тому

    I understand very little about the newer generations of particles, but I'm curious if the muon is a heavier form of an electron, couldn't we use it in a fashion to transfer more electrical energy? Just a shot in the dark, if I'm misunderstanding the generational steps, please forgive me. This lecture was very interesting and fun, a spark if you will, thank you very much!

  • @dineshhosamani2924
    @dineshhosamani2924 7 років тому +1

    A very educational video, I often see it. Also I appeal to people please don't post vulgar and sexist comments. She is a scientist and just because she is a woman we should not slander her we should be proud of her and support her with constructive feedback

  • @aryehfinklestein9041
    @aryehfinklestein9041 6 років тому

    Especially marvelous presentation...enlightening. Thankyou.

  • @CarterColeisInfamous
    @CarterColeisInfamous 6 років тому +5

    17:08
    she caught her slip on 400 mil times a second

  • @maxdoubt5219
    @maxdoubt5219 7 років тому +2

    Way over my head, but impressive and enchanting.

    • @gregalexander4660
      @gregalexander4660 3 роки тому

      Inverted DOME = Free Energy = What to the Fear Most? People Knowing [35]

  • @SG-SilverGaming
    @SG-SilverGaming 4 роки тому

    How can someone dislike this
    A deep explanation

  • @evolvedcopper2205
    @evolvedcopper2205 4 роки тому

    Thumbnail 10/10 and lecture 11/10

  • @travisfitzwater8093
    @travisfitzwater8093 2 роки тому

    There is some lost energy (particles) when a beam is coaxed in more than one direction at once. Meaning in a Zed Vector? Or, are you saying the entire beam is lost if you change the algebra of the curve to bend in an additional direction?

  • @robadams5799
    @robadams5799 2 роки тому

    I grew up in Burbank, Illinois, about 40 miles from Fermilab.

  • @douro20
    @douro20 5 років тому

    The cyclotron at TRIUMF will continue to be important in the coming years due to its exceptionally bright proton beam and the ability to accelerate rare isotopes.

  • @zubble7144
    @zubble7144 4 роки тому

    Dr. Sheely, have you considered augmenting your Paul trap design together with the motivating force of a Cyclotron? IOW use a synchronized electric charge to attenuate the attractive (counter-containment force) of the alternating magnetic fields.

  • @quill444
    @quill444 6 років тому +88

    We could simply build the World's Greatest Linear Accelerator between Texas and California, and then just let 'certain people' *think* it's a WALL.....(!)

    • @Peter_Scheen
      @Peter_Scheen 6 років тому +7

      And you would proof the Earth is not flat at the same time!!!

    • @mikakorhonen5715
      @mikakorhonen5715 6 років тому

      You are talking about Hyberloop. :)

    • @TheBukaj150
      @TheBukaj150 5 років тому +2

      LOL hyper loop linear accelerator to aid humans in genetic development smash to groups of people together to get a supertior new race of home spaien evulcian

    • @DanielRetureau
      @DanielRetureau 4 роки тому

      please post the concept to the White House Washington DC USA; & thank you it's a wonderful idea !

    • @justincallahan972
      @justincallahan972 4 роки тому

      And the price might ultimately be less than a wall. Show financial benefits and the administration might go for it.

  • @cupajoesir
    @cupajoesir 7 років тому +82

    talk nerdy to me

  • @chriswhitt6618
    @chriswhitt6618 3 роки тому

    What a brilliant video this was. Thanks

  • @Czeckie
    @Czeckie 6 років тому

    this is a great talk, much better than the ri usual. She's not dumbing it down too much and she has a concrete story to tell. On the other hand, it's hard for me to focus on all the details and the overall ideas. But that's not a problem, I can rewatch it. If I were in the auditorium, I would leave frustrated because of my stupidity.

    • @13minutestomidnight
      @13minutestomidnight 3 роки тому

      Huh. So you're saying you can't understand it on a first run-through (and no, these lectures aren't supposed to need re-watching to understand), and yet you criticise other RI lectures because they "dumb down" their subject matter. Right.
      If you can't understand the lecture, you can't judge whether it's any good or not, btw, although thank you for pointing out how problematic and contradictory your own opinions are.
      You're certainly right about your own stupidity. Might want to work on that.

  • @lk9650
    @lk9650 7 років тому +1

    Number of atoms in the human body is about 10^27. Number of stars in the observable universe is about 10^24

  • @ashoknaganur8551
    @ashoknaganur8551 2 роки тому

    Studied about. The working applications technology and particle physics in accelerator

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 3 роки тому

    I would add statically charge energy from lambs hairs and glass rods or curved glass sheets and spacers to static ballance.

  • @PhotonicEmission
    @PhotonicEmission 8 років тому

    Holy crap, I work for Varian. I didn't know that Suzie was talking at the RI. Why doesn't my company tell me things like this?!

  • @joshuadaltilia8480
    @joshuadaltilia8480 5 років тому

    She mentioned cancer, I fell victim to testicular cancer and so I've had to get chemotherapy treatment to prevent myself from getting any other form of cancer

  • @A.Lifecraft
    @A.Lifecraft 4 роки тому +1

    As an interdisciplinary guy, i am amused by the fact that particle physicists only recently came up with the idea to run through resonances. Because this is what railroad engineers do for over 100 years now. Railroad suspension and wheels are designed in a way that they encounter resonance at about 5-20kph, because no train will go 5-20 kph for any extended period of time.

    • @fbcaware8805
      @fbcaware8805 4 роки тому

      Science and research tend to develop in silos, which is very detrimental to finding simple solutions to common problems.

    • @A.Lifecraft
      @A.Lifecraft 4 роки тому +1

      @@fbcaware8805 Yes, also there ist little encouragement for people with a broad set of interests. Usually you have to dive in deep in the very discipline you choose to study and it leaves little time and ressources for anything else. This ist why many highly intelligent people abort university.

    • @A.Lifecraft
      @A.Lifecraft 4 роки тому

      @Dirk Knight try to grasp what i am saying first before insulting me. This is not about some general understanding of harmonic oscillation. This is about a specific way to deal with it in engineering. A way that has been implemented in railroad engineering for about 150 years and is used to earthquake-proof buildings for at least 50 years.

    • @A.Lifecraft
      @A.Lifecraft 4 роки тому

      @Dirk Knight This video is titled "Accelerators reimagined". According to what you are stating here, this "reimagination" should have happened in 1930 - only it did not. This kind of physical knowledge was implemented in railway engineering by the early 1800s but it never made it into accelerator design until now, yet you see an opportunity to throw your butthurtness at me... Whatever you come up with now, i will not read it and will not answer to it. You are in my opinion not a person worth perceiving.

  • @robertlong2531
    @robertlong2531 3 роки тому

    Really good thanks, could we not have the audience Q & A's too please?

    • @nettlesoup
      @nettlesoup Рік тому

      Q&A video is linked in the description

  • @nigeldepledge3790
    @nigeldepledge3790 4 роки тому

    I reckon there must be millions of particle accelerators in the world. Every thermionic valve is a particle accelerator.

  • @justimagine2403
    @justimagine2403 2 роки тому

    I so want to go back to school. Especially science.

  • @ronlokk
    @ronlokk 5 років тому +1

    I love the RI videos, but I have to keep going back Jay Leno's garage to get back down to earth and then come back here and try to understand it all. Wew!

  • @dghart76
    @dghart76 7 років тому +2

    These talks are more entertaining than anything you can find on television . If science was favoured over celebrity society would be all the more richer

    • @rimckd825
      @rimckd825 4 роки тому +1

      I dumped my cable tv service - have internet only now

  • @daveb5041
    @daveb5041 7 років тому +1

    They should accelerate the particle with the U-Beam. It's CEO doesn't have a degree in engineering and it definitely shows.

  • @johntowner1893
    @johntowner1893 4 роки тому +1

    Definitely my kind of Girl.
    Although I like the audience question and answer section to be included, It felt like the single audience question included at the end was asked by someone with a self interest in the area of “investment” that he inquired about re high energy particle accelerators and a particular innovation therein.

  • @davemartin8409
    @davemartin8409 7 років тому +1

    28:00 Jedi Knight Suzie Sheehy makes a mock-up of a light-saber

  • @lasuperneta3042
    @lasuperneta3042 Рік тому

    Miss Sheehy are You for real?? All that intelligence, beauty an sympathy bundled in one individual is simply too difficult to believe… all my good will and admiration for You…
    Best regards!!
    Victor Micha Mexico City. 🇲🇽 ✌🏽😎

  • @michaelwiberg9173
    @michaelwiberg9173 4 роки тому

    Try ionic ACCharged pyramids and repulsion by neg energy double helix field resonance. On one side of earth flow goes one direction down a drain opposite upon the other side of the equator. Directly down on the equator into the drain. This resonance is reactive to relationships. I

  • @stephenbrown40
    @stephenbrown40 3 роки тому

    Amazing lecture, I really enjoyed the theory of magnetic fields oscillating with induced electromagnetic' to give an avalanche type of effect to the particles in a cavity, If these could be strung together in such a way that increased energy is applied to the particles. Is this the idea being put forward to increase the energy output, have I understood what is being proposed.

  • @Draalo
    @Draalo 7 років тому

    about 35:20 - "we have people who are better of it" - Dear Ms. Suzie Sheehy, pls consider at least a volunteer for those demonstrations - at least you can blame them for THEIR mishaps ;)
    (Still) Enjoying your lecture.
    Regards from the Ruhrgebiet,
    Draalo

  • @MrKay-fm4kd
    @MrKay-fm4kd 4 роки тому

    Is proton-beam decay acceleration necessary for nuclear waste recycling in a Thorium reactor if you use a Molten Salt Reactor (MSR)?

  • @RogerBarraud
    @RogerBarraud 7 років тому +1

    Love that this starts off with New Zealand (Rutherford) :-)

  • @natasfresas
    @natasfresas 8 років тому +3

    Great! I love this channel.

    • @sirvapalot
      @sirvapalot 4 роки тому

      me too its straight up educational and i love youtube more than ever im all about understanding i have questions

  • @MrPinknumber
    @MrPinknumber 8 років тому +7

    pretty interesting talk :)

  • @travisfitzwater8093
    @travisfitzwater8093 2 роки тому

    Study interfering with the magnets. Get Goggles deep blue to work out how the winding of wires of brass mixed with some mercury interlineated or interlocking interlaced interphased and bolts of brass shot through the windings and lead steel wood. A wooden bolt like a telephone poll but made out of compress cedar but ONLY with the knots of the tree as the raw material and some binding agent. Also with wormy chestnut and redwood. DB will spit out like a million different ways you can bend an energy beam. Then build a a two figure 8 shaped loop that has been twisted over itself enough to stack vertically and drill giant deep bore holes around the perimeter filled with wave absorbing material that will divert waves travelling across the top of the ground into energy transferred into them to damping seismic interference. Save a 100km of digging.

  • @jayyyzeee6409
    @jayyyzeee6409 7 років тому +5

    At 17:04, mentioned 400 MHz saying that's 400 times per second, but should have said 400 million times per second. She corrected it at 17:20 though.