Sir your statement doesn't justify with maharishis statement. Brihat parashara hora shastra. Chapter 29 shloka no 4 and 5. Same house or the 7th from it does not become the pada. When pada falls in same house or 7th 10th therefrom should be treated as pada. And if Lord of bhava is 4th from bhava no counting is required. House occupied by Lord itself is arudha. And in jaimini sutram by ps shastri Chapter 1 quarter 1. Shloka 30 If Lord of sign is 4th from it 4th from it becomes arudha. Shloka 31. Lord of sign is 7th from it, that very sign becomes it's arudha. And surprisingly both are old authors which we can refer. Which one is correct both contradict each other. Which one to refer???
Parashara is always right and so is Jaimini. But question is do you have the oldest manuscript, probably not, so there are interpolations and modifications that might have caused this, I'm Sagittarius Lagna and my Jupiter is in 7th house, but my AL is in 10 house (Virgo) which is correct.
Many thanks for sharing your insights in a clear and concise manner, If in a chart with Libra Asc, Venus is in Pisces, then Arudha Lagna would be Leo, correct?
Some say count from Ascendant Lord to Ascendant... others say count from Ascendant to Ascendant Lord (other way around). Not sure who to believe... gives me two VERY different results
Ok, Everywhere I read this rule regarding 1st and 7th house. I have libra rising and Venus is in cancer 10th house, using the rule my AL would be Capricorn in 4th house (not at all accurate) without the rule it's in Aries 7th house. Correct? Thank
Sir,I am very very interested in watching your excellent jyotish videos.Your logical explanations and analysis are JUST MIND BLOWING and FANTASTIC! My only request is expecting many analysising videos under different topics from you.Waiting for many videos,Sir
Sir GREAT explanation OUTSTANDING LOGIC but the question is arises that what is the significance of arudh lagna lord it's equal to arudh lagna or its exalted aur deliblated.......Thank you SIR
just as a strong lagna lord elevates the character of a person and makes him strong-willed, a strong AL lord will make the person appear powerful in the eyes of others..
Sir, you began with the statement that Arudha lagna tells how public perceives you or think about you, but you made a horoscope analysis, we can use as well D-10, if we have to talk of career. Where is the public perception in your entire talk? Please clarify.
Karakamsha is where your atma karaka planet gets placed in d9. Hence it's all about soul purpose. Arudha is more about how you are perceived by people , whether that perception may be true, may not be true.
Your Videos are really awesome & easy to understand! I would request you to go through each ascendant & each planet in different Nakshatras & different zodiacs
13:34 Is Mars benific when checking arudha lagna ? What if in birth chart Mars is the 10th lord ( Aries) and is sitting in arudha lagna (leo sign ) ? Is this auspicious?
I m saggitarius ascendant nd my lagna lord jupiter is in 7th house in gemini, so will my arudha lagna will be sagittarius only ? Please do reply because other videos are giving other calculations as per them my 4th house will become arudha lagna
As you say position of lagna lord from lagna the arudha lagna is double if so if some body has kumba rasi and lagna lord is shani and shani posited in makara thats 12 houses away that means arudha is makara?
Are you using Jaimini aspects or Parashari aspects in the example chart? and if using Parashari aspects than why? Isn't Arudha lagna a Jaimini concept?
Lagna & 7th house, houses of truth. Arudha Lagna is maya, so arudha of any house won’t fall in the same house or 7th from it. That’s what astrology parampara school teaches us..
Rahu has directional strength in 10th house, if not bad sign-wise, the native will have the capability to pull the masses. The key here is that Rahu influences 10th house not only in Rasi, but Arudha chart as well. This is not a normal horoscope. Cheers
Thanks for the video. MY doubt is whether you are using Lagna at the time of birth or Chandra Lagna, and if Arudha Lagna is strong can we consider prediction taking arudha lagna as strong lagna
Brihat parashara hora shastra... Chapter 29 verse 4-5 Same house Or 7th does not become it's pada. When the pada falls in the same house Or the 7th .. 10th from it should be taken as pada. And if Lord of bhava is in 4th from bhava, no counting is required. House occupied by Lord itself is arudha
Dear you are wrong..give logic..otherwise I will give you..these exceptions are working excellently..also you are not jaimini. .pls only teach Rishis work..not yours if without authenticity..While Rishis works are authentic .pls be an authentic astrologer..learn more to clear the points..then speak
jyotishvidya.com/adh1_1.htm ADHYAYA 1 - PADA 1 SU. 30. Swasthe daraha. If Lagnadhipathi is in the 4th, then the 7th becomes Pada Lagna. SU. 31. Sutasthe janma. If the lord of Lagna is in the 7th from Lagna, then Lagna itself becomes Arudha Lagna.
HEEEEE! All the arguments below remind me of Tropical astrologers fighting over house systems. Why not experiment and see what works for you, in your experience? Willi B. in Canada.
hey, does arudha lagna show what image you are trying to put out in public? or does it show what image public sees you in? I get confused with graha arudha and arudha lagna. please help clear my understanding! God bless!!
+Nilay Patel it shows the image which you want to put amongst the people, the concept which you are talking of Graha arudha that shows how people perceive you and the image which they have made in their mind. But see arudha lagna is totally different from graha arudha but much more important than that.
Sir, I always felt the method you said is correct. When I use those exceptions found in books or oline I notice things don't make sense for people. But when I read bhrihat parashara hora shastr or jaimini sutra, etc... there are sloka that talk about the exceptions. Are you saying these sloka are currupt and added by bad astrologers in the past? I want to believe you, since I agree the method you said works great. But when I do that so many other astrologers say I am wrong and point me to the sloka in the texts that mentions exceptions.. :(
+Garett E. See that's what I have said repeatedly in my videos that everything that's written might not be working in reality, but people believe it as a pure stoned theory and never bother to check its accuracy in real life and argue just on the basis that it's written in ancient texts. By doing this you are losing your rationality and scientific temper and become ritualistic and Orthodox instead. Jyotish is like science where many things are still unknown so if any maharishi has written about it, it does not mean that it's always true , if you come up with new working method then people find it hard to digest because they think that any new method in modern astrology cannot be true if it is in contradiction with the old one. This attitude cannot make a person a good astrologer ever as you are not open to new knowledge and you are just blowing your own trumpet and that too not on your research and findings but that of others.
That is all true. It bothers me too when people just say something is correct because it is in a book or because it is popular opinion, but they don't actually go test on many charts themselves or bother to try anything non-traditional. I was just wondering if there was a sloka or some proof in any version of a text that mentions not using exception, so that I can have something to use against people who argue back to me saying I am wrong for not using exception. But if not, then I understand, and we will just do it the way that works best for us and feel sorry for people who are stuck in old ritualistic ways. Thanks for the reply.
+Garett E. You don't need any shloka to your method correct, what you need is to demonstrate that it truly works and not just in any one case but in general. Let people say what they want to say, you follow what is correct and true even if it is not mentioned in any ancient jyotish text.
Wonder share. You explain like a teacher. Liked it. Please keep us enlightened.
So whn Lagna lord is sitting in 1st house person is natural and authentic, all others are playing games to present "public image"" lols
The best one of arudha lagna videos of u tube
Thank you very much sir
Good luck
God bless you
Very nice and clear explanation brother. All the best ❤️
Sir your statement doesn't justify with maharishis statement.
Brihat parashara hora shastra.
Chapter 29 shloka no 4 and 5.
Same house or the 7th from it does not become the pada. When pada falls in same house or 7th 10th therefrom should be treated as pada.
And if Lord of bhava is 4th from bhava no counting is required. House occupied by Lord itself is arudha.
And in jaimini sutram by ps shastri
Chapter 1 quarter 1.
Shloka 30
If Lord of sign is 4th from it 4th from it becomes arudha.
Shloka 31.
Lord of sign is 7th from it, that very sign becomes it's arudha.
And surprisingly both are old authors which we can refer.
Which one is correct both contradict each other.
Which one to refer???
Parashara is always right and so is Jaimini. But question is do you have the oldest manuscript, probably not, so there are interpolations and modifications that might have caused this, I'm Sagittarius Lagna and my Jupiter is in 7th house, but my AL is in 10 house (Virgo) which is correct.
@@DistantGlowingStar I got this from most authentic author (R.santhanam ) and jaimini from (p.s shastri)
Many thanks for sharing your insights in a clear and concise manner,
If in a chart with Libra Asc, Venus is in Pisces, then Arudha Lagna would be Leo, correct?
Some say count from Ascendant Lord to Ascendant... others say count from Ascendant to Ascendant Lord (other way around). Not sure who to believe... gives me two VERY different results
Ok,
Everywhere I read this rule regarding 1st and 7th house.
I have libra rising and Venus is in cancer 10th house, using the rule my AL would be Capricorn in 4th house (not at all accurate) without the rule it's in Aries 7th house.
Correct? Thank
According to what he says, yes. I am also inclined to believe that the 7th can be AL..
Sir,I am very very interested in watching your excellent jyotish videos.Your logical explanations and analysis are JUST MIND BLOWING and FANTASTIC!
My only request is expecting many analysising videos under different topics from you.Waiting for many videos,Sir
+Gopal vj Thanks a lot for appreciation
@@AstroEdify but what about his wealth, the 11 house Is debilitated then how did he get so much wealth?
Will scorpio ascendent in D1 chart have 2 arudha lagna. 1 arudha lagna from ketu and another arudha lagna from Mars?
Sir GREAT explanation OUTSTANDING LOGIC but the question is arises that what is the significance of arudh lagna lord it's equal to arudh lagna or its exalted aur deliblated.......Thank you SIR
just as a strong lagna lord elevates the character of a person and makes him strong-willed, a strong AL lord will make the person appear powerful in the eyes of others..
@@niro56 thank you brother that's also my id
hello Sir Arudha lagana Lord Venus is sitting in 10th house with moon in D1 chart and AL is 9th house in main chart. how do I read it.
I like you so very much! Something about you is just good!
What if the lord of 1st House in Natal Chart is sitting in 10th House from Arudha Lagna? Would the mass fame still be valid?
Sir, you began with the statement that Arudha lagna tells how public perceives you or think about you, but you made a horoscope analysis, we can use as well D-10, if we have to talk of career. Where is the public perception in your entire talk? Please clarify.
Sir,I have a question,which one between the arudha nd the karakamsha lagna is more important to understand the soul purpose of a person?
karakamsha !
Karakamsha is where your atma karaka planet gets placed in d9. Hence it's all about soul purpose. Arudha is more about how you are perceived by people , whether that perception may be true, may not be true.
@@deepakjena3628 atmakaraka of rasi chart ?
@@hat_awesome21 There is only one atmakaraka of your entire horoscope.
What happens when lagna is in lagna only. So even prediction remain same as in lagna chart!?
Your Videos are really awesome & easy to understand! I would request you to go through each ascendant & each planet in different Nakshatras & different zodiacs
13:34 Is Mars benific when checking arudha lagna ? What if in birth chart Mars is the 10th lord ( Aries) and is sitting in arudha lagna (leo sign ) ? Is this auspicious?
Good video sir,
If the house is vacant when we count arudha lagna, then what planet to consider
Arudha lagna is always a house- vacant or not
How do you find arudha and graha in navamsa?
I m saggitarius ascendant nd my lagna lord jupiter is in 7th house in gemini, so will my arudha lagna will be sagittarius only ? Please do reply because other videos are giving other calculations as per them my 4th house will become arudha lagna
I too got confused with this
Good video but malefic and benefic show its tendencies in arudha lagna i mean malefic in arudha lagna means no good fame..is it true
can you analyse the chart if I give
St expedite helped me in my office matter
So counting 1 house from the 1st is still the first right.
Yes
@@AstroEdify thank you just making sure.
what if...lagna lord of d1 is in arudha lagn?
Arudha lagan and lagan lord both in 3rd house in gemini.... Wat it shows...
As you say position of lagna lord from lagna the arudha lagna is double if so if some body has kumba rasi and lagna lord is shani and shani posited in makara thats 12 houses away that means arudha is makara?
Are you using Jaimini aspects or Parashari aspects in the example chart? and if using Parashari aspects than why? Isn't Arudha lagna a Jaimini concept?
I have already mentioned in the video itself that arudha lagna is not restricted to jaimini or parashara, it can be used in both of them.
@AstroEdify thanks for the clarification.
We also need to understand that the Jaimini and Parashara hora Sastras are not so different as they compliment each other.
Lagna & 7th house, houses of truth. Arudha Lagna is maya, so arudha of any house won’t fall in the same house or 7th from it. That’s what astrology parampara school teaches us..
They say having Rahu in the 10 the house is a sin that you will have a public image is that different?
Rahu has directional strength in 10th house, if not bad sign-wise, the native will have the capability to pull the masses. The key here is that Rahu influences 10th house not only in Rasi, but Arudha chart as well. This is not a normal horoscope. Cheers
Plus tell gay's or thirdgender chart
Thankyou for explaining so nicely sir🙏
What if the lagna lord is retrograde? Kindly answer
5 lord from AL or from Lagna.? Sir
Thanks for the video. MY doubt is whether you are using Lagna at the time of birth or Chandra Lagna, and if Arudha Lagna is strong can we consider prediction taking arudha lagna as strong lagna
I think Arudha lagna is how people perceive you.
Do you know where the idea of the 1st/7th house exceptions came from, or how it got popular?
Brihat parashara hora shastra...
Chapter 29 verse 4-5
Same house Or 7th does not become it's pada. When the pada falls in the same house Or the 7th .. 10th from it should be taken as pada.
And if Lord of bhava is in 4th from bhava, no counting is required. House occupied by Lord itself is arudha
What he said is wrong..
@@roshansuvarna6191 Good find
Dear you are wrong..give logic..otherwise I will give you..these exceptions are working excellently..also you are not jaimini. .pls only teach Rishis work..not yours if without authenticity..While Rishis works are authentic .pls be an authentic astrologer..learn more to clear the points..then speak
Jaimini Sutras 1.1.30 & 1.1.31
jyotishvidya.com/adh1_1.htm
ADHYAYA 1 - PADA 1
SU. 30. Swasthe daraha.
If Lagnadhipathi is in the 4th, then the 7th becomes Pada Lagna.
SU. 31. Sutasthe janma.
If the lord of Lagna is in the 7th from Lagna, then Lagna itself becomes Arudha Lagna.
Dear Goel, k n Rao also express the same view...
@@p.nallathambisamy6474 what kn rao suggests ?
sir do u mean lagna lord in lagna means ,world sees them as what they are from inside.
+abhinav tripathi no, not at all. What it only shows is what person actually thinks no matter what he portrays
abhinav tripathi
Hi there Sir Pls Do the Vipreet Raj Yoga would appreciate it!!!!
With arudha lagana only Jamini yogas apply correct? No parasari yogas apply in it correct?
My mother's family is of angirasa gotra
HEEEEE! All the arguments below remind me of Tropical astrologers fighting over house systems. Why not experiment and see what works for you, in your experience? Willi B. in Canada.
i have 4 planet in AL .in leo ..sun mars mercury venus
Since you R describing a known person's chart, it's difficult to analyse the chart of new chart whom you do not
The exceptions are written by parasara himself just that kn Rao doesn't use it and i highly doubt if you have really studied the scriptures?
hey, does arudha lagna show what image you are trying to put out in public? or does it show what image public sees you in? I get confused with graha arudha and arudha lagna. please help clear my understanding! God bless!!
+Nilay Patel it shows the image which you want to put amongst the people, the concept which you are talking of Graha arudha that shows how people perceive you and the image which they have made in their mind. But see arudha lagna is totally different from graha arudha but much more important than that.
AstroEdify thank you for replying back! I understand now!
What people perceive you unconsciously...your unconscious self
Thank you, Sir
Welldone Brother
love it
太遗憾了没字幕看不懂
Do we calculate this also for navamsha
+Maria Zheleva no only in lagna chart
thank you
Very true!
Complete
👍
Sir, I always felt the method you said is correct. When I use those exceptions found in books or oline I notice things don't make sense for people.
But when I read bhrihat parashara hora shastr or jaimini sutra, etc... there are sloka that talk about the exceptions. Are you saying these sloka are currupt and added by bad astrologers in the past?
I want to believe you, since I agree the method you said works great. But when I do that so many other astrologers say I am wrong and point me to the sloka in the texts that mentions exceptions.. :(
+Garett E. See that's what I have said repeatedly in my videos that everything that's written might not be working in reality, but people believe it as a pure stoned theory and never bother to check its accuracy in real life and argue just on the basis that it's written in ancient texts. By doing this you are losing your rationality and scientific temper and become ritualistic and Orthodox instead. Jyotish is like science where many things are still unknown so if any maharishi has written about it, it does not mean that it's always true , if you come up with new working method then people find it hard to digest because they think that any new method in modern astrology cannot be true if it is in contradiction with the old one. This attitude cannot make a person a good astrologer ever as you are not open to new knowledge and you are just blowing your own trumpet and that too not on your research and findings but that of others.
That is all true. It bothers me too when people just say something is correct because it is in a book or because it is popular opinion, but they don't actually go test on many charts themselves or bother to try anything non-traditional. I was just wondering if there was a sloka or some proof in any version of a text that mentions not using exception, so that I can have something to use against people who argue back to me saying I am wrong for not using exception. But if not, then I understand, and we will just do it the way that works best for us and feel sorry for people who are stuck in old ritualistic ways. Thanks for the reply.
+Garett E. You don't need any shloka to your method correct, what you need is to demonstrate that it truly works and not just in any one case but in general. Let people say what they want to say, you follow what is correct and true even if it is not mentioned in any ancient jyotish text.
Thank you, you are right.
I have a few good examples where it works perfect...so I will continue to just show those to people who doubt
👍🏾
wrong hai bhai
Beard don't suit you sir.