Wernher von Braun was a member of the SS and visited the notorious Mittelwerk underground factory where slave labourers worked in atrocious conditions to build his rockets. But, after being plucked from Europe by the United States, von Braun will take NASA to the moon. By the end of his career, he’ll have been decorated by both Hitler and US President Gerald Ford.
"Gather 'round while I sing you of Wernher von Braun A man whose allegiance Is ruled by expedience Call him a Nazi, he won't even frown "Nazi, Schmazi!" says Wernher von Braun Don't say that he's hypocritical Say rather that he's apolitical "Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down? That's not my department!" says Wernher von Braun" -Tom Lehrer
You can't imagine just how funny I find your comment. My late German grandfather's name was Walter. He was an engineer and worked in the German armaments industry during the war.
@@mikethespike7579 and it looks like U didnt get-Walter.Looks like your`s grandpa bad blood didnt die.Some karma in a bad way will hit You,so.Its just works like this.
You forgot to mention that the German army was interested in rockets, even before Hitler came to power and scrapped the treaty of Versailles, becasue the treaty of Versailles didn't say anything about the Gernam army not being allowed to use rockets.
Well, he did say most of that. But it’s unlikely it was the treaty that was the main impetus for this. These were basically a replacement for the very heavy artillery the Germans favored. But it wasn’t thought to be practical, which is why the program had hiccups in support.
@@_ArsNova The main caveat being the implementation of such war changing weaponry was postponed or deemed unnecessary for short term success. Which was a defining factor of The German War industry and decision making in WW2 So no you cant extrapolate that to ‘every other military’ Britain wanted tanks in ww1? They got tanks within a relatively short timeframe America wanted a nuclear bomb? They got that within the alloted timeframe Etc and so forth . + I mean the video demonstrates how the German war industry fluctuated - with Hitler initially scoffing at V2
@@YedolfWesler The German generals did indeed wanted Hitler to neutralise the British in the Middle East before launching Barbarossa. The capture of the Suez Canal was high on their lists of priorities. I think they overlooked that sending the sort of force to North Africa necessary to achieve that required a major amphibious operation which would be very vulnerable. Otherwise persuade Turkey to join the War on the Axis side, or simply invade Turkey, to reach the rest of the Middle East by land. Not an easy undertaking. Also, although Stalin had his head in the sand re Hitler's intentions, Molotov did not. Molotov distrusted Hitler and the Nazis from Day 1 of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Treaty In 1940 the USSR had embarked on another 5 Year Plan to build up its military, and would have been much more ready by say late 1942-43 than they were in 1941.
some have harsh words for this man of renown, but some think our attitude should be one of gratitude, like the widows and cripples in old london town, who owe their large pensions to Wernher von Braun
@@pnutz_2You too may be a big hero, Once you've learned to count backwards to zero. "In German oder English I know how to count down, Und I'm learning Chinese," says Wernher von Braun!
1:57 Walter was like: "Hey Walter, shall we join up?" And Walter was like, "Let's ask Walter". And Walter was like, "Walter, why Walter?" and Walter was like: "If Walter's in, I'm in." And so Walter was like, "Walter, are you in?" And Walter was like "I already said, ask Walter." But Walter was like, "No, other Walter." But Walter didn't answer because he still thought he was talking to the other Walter. And so advancement in German rocketry was delayed by several minutes.
My father was a kid on occupied Holland south of Rotterdam, and he saw a V2 launch pad set up across the river Maas. That soon scared the neighborhood, because of the high rate of failed missiles falling all over the place. He said the missiles often ended in fields or splashed in the river, once almost destroying their bridge. After Market-Garden (or before) the Germans V2 pad site was abandoned. FYI: after the war their island kept under unarmed german occupation a long time, due to disease outbreak (he said typhus) and quarantine.
I'd have been far more worried about allied planes targeting the launch site. The allies were very watchful of where these V2s were being launched from and if they had an opportunity would target them and take out the whole area.
@@mikethespike7579 V2 launch pads were portable. The Allies couldn't figure out where they were being launched from. After the war, they realized why they had been unable to find the launch site(s).
I will be more modest than the aim of the 100 year's war, which is in essence the culmination of medieval warfare. I will settle (but for no less) than the 80 year's war of The Netherlands independence of the Spanish Empire. This is a war that has had many firsts and the birth of one of the first modern Republics of what is now one of the few remaining European monarchies. It featured the invention of modern Marines in naval warfare. The US Marines have the motto of 'Semper Fidelis' which means "Forever Faithfull'. The Dutch Marines have the very practical motto of "Qua Patet Orbis" roughly meaning "Wherever in the World". The true and complete motto should read: "Qua Patet Orbis, Semper Fidelis.". Even the use of Commandoes and modern army organization, combined operations, combat engineering and logistics were established during this conflict.
I mean it can be done, not week by week of course 😅 but maybe week by year? is an a year of conflict in one weekly episode. 100 weeks to cover the whole thing.
It is somewhat interesting that the V2 rocket and Wasserfall missile would lay the groundwork postwar in the future for things like the cruise missile and the air to air missile, as well as rocketry missions to the Moon. The story of Wernher Von Braun is rather a storied one too, from assisting the Germans with the V2 rocket until later leading America's NASA with the design of the Saturn V to the moon in 1969. Thank you team for this Special episode as always!
Indeed, the first picture of the earth taken from space was taken by a camera on a V2. It was launched at the White Sands Missile Range outside Alamogordo, NM in 1946.
I live in Wassenaar, South Holland in the Netherlands. The very first V2 rockets aimed at London were launched within 1km of my home, 8 september 1944. A few more were launched from the nearby forests in the following months. And a bunch were launched from The Hague and Rijswijk. They literally used a small crossroad covered by trees to launch the Rockets. It left burn marks on the trees there when it was launched. There is still a small memorial there. There are a few websites that go into great detail about the launches, the launch sites, where they landed, the ones that failed during take off etc. Very interesting reads
My Dad was a Radar Guidance Engineer with G.E. Aerospace at Cape Canaveral from '56 thru '76 but before that he was teaching a Radar school at Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville for the army when Dr. Von Braun and his German scientists and engineers were there. My Dad would spoke fondly of Dr. von Braun's Friday night gatherings he would host at his house where all things rocketry were discussed.
@@GorgeDawes Up until the 1990s von Braun was only known for his pioneering work in Nazi Germany and later for his work at NASA. That he was also a decorated SS officer (which is not a war crime) and had a part in, or at least knew of the use of slave labour to manufacture his V2s, (which is a war crime) became public knowledge later. Most certainly the US government knew about this but the US space program was more important than punishing Nazi war criminals.
Any discussion or what-if scenarios around Germany doing better prioritizing a wonder weapon or preserving military capacity on the eastern front or pushing back the allies or whatever. None of them lead to Germany winning world war 2. Instead it means that two nuclear bombs would be dropped on Germany instead of Japan in August 1945. Who was, from the inception, the intended target of the Manhatten project.
Also all of these wonder weapons seem primarily concerned with attacking the civilian population or preventing such attacks. It seems pretty clearly established to me that attacks on the civiliant populations are mostly irrelevant for the outcome of the war. Germany lost a land war and these wonder weapons would not do anything about that.
Rocket research and production was expensive, and as they show in the video, used a fair amount of resources. But really, it pales when compared to that spent on tanks, submarines, airplanes and the rest. But by the time this became viable, Germany was already reeling from their major defeats. Would these made the difference somewhere? No really. With a V2 having an accuracy of 7 kilometers, or more, they would be fairly useless against opposing armies. They would need hundreds of them in a single battle area. The ability to manufacturer that many and fuel them would have been impossible, much less doing it all along both fronts.
Adolf Galland, General of the Fighter Force, was once asked if an earlier mass production of the Me262 jet fighter (which Galland himself flew in combat), could have changed the outcome of the war. His answer was "No, it would only have prolonged it, thus costing even more lives." I guess the same is true for the V1 and V2, especially as these were not accurate enough for tactical use.
V2 was a quite effective shock weapon due to the total lack of warning before it hit. I might have proven as effective as the atomic bomb if deployed in large enough numbers.
@ The 262 had decent range and could use pretty much anything as fuel, it didnt need expensive and scarce high octane avgas. Regarding engines, WW2 fighters didnt survive too long in combat, and the jets were FAR cheaper and faster to build than a piston engine.
The V1 was far more effective, since it could be intercepted the allies had to divert HUGE resources to try to counter them... and were also DIRT CHEAP. There was no defense against the V2, so no allied expense, and the whole V2 program was more expensive than the manhattan Project.
If Germany had had the V2 in time for the Battle of Britain... the hopelessness of defending against it (not to mention the preservation of the Luftwaffe) might have completely changed Britain's willingness to keep fighting.
Due to both the Americans and Russians utilizing post war rocket technology and personnel from Germany; it was a standard joke that when an U.S. & USSR satellites would cross paths in orbit; they would greet each other in German. 14:57
Captured A4s were of course the foundation of the US and Soviet and UK rocket programs. During the war an A4 had reached a maximum altitude of over 160 kilometers, which is well into space. There was a British plan to put a man into space using an enlarged and extensively modified version of the A4. Unfortunately the British economy was in desperate shape and the government didn't fund this. If they had, a suborbital flight like Alan Shepard's could have been made ~8 years earlier and a Brit would have been the first person into space. Please note: suborbital refers to speed, not altitude. It is relatively easy to launch a rocket into space (above 100 km). It's difficult to accelerate it enough to stay there in orbit, circling the Earth with out falling back down.
A less enthusiastic part of the British plan would be that the astronaut would return to earth at the speed of 1500 meters per second, far faster than tea...
@@penultimateh766 Sorry, YT cut off part of your reply. The Megaroc proposal aimed for a 300 km altitude but they could easily have dropped it to 120 km or so. The New Shepard capsule returns from over 100 km with little in the way of a heat shield, and certainly not an ablative one. I've never been able to find anything about what NS has at the base of the capsule, although the abort motor can tolerate being in contact with it.
Did the British have a large community interested in spaceflight? Guess that's not something I'd ever heard of. Of course there was no way their government would fund anything like that when their economy was still crippled from years of war - they were still rationing food well into the 1950's and didn't have their colonies to fall back on for resources anymore.
@@Raskolnikov70 At the time the Brits were very interested in space flight. They even had an official national space flight society that planned a moon landing and had designed a space suit for use on the moon. Needless to say, the Brits had other far more pressing things to do such as develop the British atom bomb after the US had refused to share the technology with them.
The V2 was unlikely to win the war by itself. At the end of the day, it was an artillery piece. Such things can be massively devastating and deadly, as The Great War showed. But they are strategically and tactically of little use unless the side firing them can follow up by putting 'boots on the ground' in the area that was just bombarded. Again, as The Great War showed time and again. The biggest problem that Nazi Germany had (militarily speaking) is that they never once during all of WW2 demonstrated that they had a reasonable means to put 'boots on the ground' in England or the US. Which they needed to be able to do to win in the way Hitler wanted.
I agree with that. Who knows? By transferring resources to the V2, maybe the loss of resources to the Luftwaffe and Heer would have actually shortened the war.
@@rrice1705 I suspect it wouldn't have made a difference in the length. it should have made a difference, but as we've seen over the past six months, Hitler had been increasingly micromanaging the Wehrmacht. Even to the point of overruling his generals when they come up with good ideas for defending Germany, in favor of a mindless meat grinder defense that Germany cannot possibly keep up. And then, there was that fiasco with the Battle of the Bulge. Hitler's wasteful management of the Wehrmacht is the main factor in why the war lasted as long as it did. Without the V2, the Wehrmacht would have had more tanks and planes. But they would have been managed just as poorly.
To put 'boots on the ground' in England one only needs little rubber boats now. USA now has on its soil a huge foreign army which had only to walk over the border . . .
@@EllieMaes-Grandad now, that may be true. But back in WW2, it required an operation of the scope of D Day. Complete with specialized landing craft, mulberry harbors, and both air and naval superiority over the English Channel. DDay happened because by June 6, 1944, the Western Allies had all these things. Nazi Germany never had all these things, and never really had given themselves the chance to get all these things.
Cinema Rex in Antwerp, Belgium would have been a good mention in this video. On Dec 16th (the first day of the Ardenne offensive) a V2 landed on the movie theater. Taking the lives of 567 people, and marking it the deadliest V2 attack ever.
When I was 17 years old, my father took me on a vacation to Europe. When we were in Antwerp, we walked past the "Rex Cinema," as my father called it, and he pointed it out to me as if the name should be as familiar to me as "Pearl Harbor." I just looked at him quizzically and asked, "Yes? And?" He got a dejected look on his face and replied, "I was gonna go to movie there once--but I didn't." The newspapers didn't report on the V2 attacks because they didn't want to help the Germans improve their aim. That makes it difficult to find out information about specific V2 attacks today (at least in my experience). Another notable V2 attack on Antwerp was at Teniersplaats on November 27, with 157 deaths and more than 300 wounded. The water main was ruptured in that attack, flooding the street. The blood from all the dead and wounded stained the water red, giving an apocalyptic feel to the scene.
Indy should have said "point of impact" instead of "target". Making a 14 meter hole somewhere within a 7 kilometer circle does not really count as hitting a target.
One wonder weapon wouldn't change the outcome of the whole war - except atomic bomb. That being said I remember reading that V-1 was actually a very good weapon for one reason: it was very cost effective. Yes, it could be spotted and shot down easily, but making sure they would be downed in numbers required a lot of AA guns and resources - much more than the bomb itself did cost. Same with the launching ramps - yeah, they could be bombed, but the could be defended by AA therefore making their destruction also somehow expensive. The V-2 was the polar opposite: very technologically advanced, with no possible defense against it, but as Indy mentioned - very, VERY expensive, to the point that it was hardly worth it, actually.
@@jmjedi923 Yes in many ways the V1 and V2 was the worlds first drones. The V1 used an auto-pilot and a speed log for steering and range whereas the V2 used inertial navigation instead (the first operational use of inertial navigation). And it is correct that the V1 was an economical way to put 1000 kg of explosives on a target 200 km distant, and as originally planned by the Luftwaffe the V1 was to have been volley-launched in order to saturate the English air defences as they fully knew that the V1 was not invulnerable. Unfortunately for the Germans (and fortunately for London) they could not produce enough and was at that time so heavily bombed that they could not reach the planned production targets and synchronisation of launches.
V-2 was a ballistic missile. It means,that ,well,as we say today ,it should be used against high value targets . London fits ,but,only if army HQs and major political and production centers were to be aimed . V-1 on the other hand ,is not a drone ,but missile with wings ,if used properly, it's even deadlier than v-2. Which ,it was . So...
An absolutely amazing piece of technology, that pushed rocketry forward in so many dimensions at once. I have always been fascinated by how German scientists were able to synthesize such a complex propellant system, with something as a sophisticated as an automated, electronic, gyroscopic guidance system in the early 1940s. There are few points in history where such rapid technological advances took place over so many fields as in WWII.
It was amazing how close Nobel Prize Winner Heisenberg was to developing a functional atomic model. But he wasn't supported by Hitler. After the War, Heisenberg was still disappointed that he hadn't perfected the bomb instead of Oppenheimer. I saw this in a German documentary film.
Heisenberg didn't believe the Americans had developed a deploy-able atomic bomb when told about it after Hiroshima. His calculations on the amount of fissile material needed was so far off that no plane of WWII would have been able to carry it, let alone any missile the could have been produced by war's end.
There were many German scientists in the German atomic program. Heisenberg and the others were drafted into a high secret military project. They had no say over anything. Scientists like Manfred von Ardenne would develop a superior uranium separation process. They succeeded where the Americans failed.
The timing of this special is fitting. Last week was the 25th anniversary of the biographical movie that was about one of Wernher von Braun's big fans (and his friends) and his journey from growing up in a small coal mining town in WV to beginning his journey toward rocket science and eventually being a part of NASA. That fan: Homer Hickam That movie: October Sky Jake Gyllenhaal plays Homer in the movie.
Dear Indy and entire TimeGhost team thank you once again for the superb, in depth videos about the war, from which I as a history nerd have learned and am still learning so much! To chime in on the conversation, as you said Indy, it's still so bloody scary to see how close the nazis actually were with some of their inventions!
Nothing to be cocky about but many civilians died because of the bombing of the mobile launcher the Germans hid in residential areas.@@Centurion101B3C
From about 8:30 to 10:00 Indy just rattling off specs and intricate details with no notes about the V2. After watching for years, it finally hit me, Indy is the World's Smartest Man, as he can talk about so many subjects from memory without notes. I bet he even knows Ty Cobb's Batting Average.
All those ressources that von Braun wasted count as mitigating circumstances on his record. Imagine all that effort had gone towards a German long-range bomber (same price as the V2, but reusable.) Building the V2 instead of a bomber might in sum have saved many lives.
That is an interesting point, one that reflects in my opinion the structural weak points of National Sozialism. Göring as head of The luftwaffe appointed his personal friend Ernst Udet as "Generalluftzeugmeister", responsible for the research and deployment of new weapons. Udet, as a former pilot, wanted the long-range bombers to have dive-bombing capabilities, which was not viable and further development was stopped. I think there is a chapter on this in Richard Overy's "Why the Allies Won" (just one example). -TimeGhost Ambassador
I went to college (Alabama A&M University) in Huntsville, AL, and I first noticed the city has a convention center named after him *_Von Braun Center_* because of his work at NASA/US Military installation Redstone Arsenal which also has a building named for him on site (which is also located in the area).
You forgot to mention, that polish Armia Krajowa captured a test V2, which felt into the river of Bug, close to Menżenin village on beginning of 1944. The rocket miraculously did not explode. AK firts hid the rocket in the river, then after the Germans gave up with searching for it, disassembled it, prepared drawings and sent the papers and most important parts to UK. The UK intelligence named this action „MOST III”.
@os78The german officer was an unwitting accomplice. If you search youtube for The Secret War, an old BBC documentary, it goes into much greater detail.
@@PlayerFalcon4 Found this doc and exact moment: ua-cam.com/video/GJCF-Ufapu8/v-deo.html The german officer of course was not engaged, and idea of conducting the examination in his rarly habbited flat was brave and brilliant - why in the world the germans would search for parts of missing V2 among themself? Thanks for pointing out this detail.
@@maciejos78You are most welcome. TBH this little factoid ticks all my boxes - aviation, espionage and technology, and how they overlapped during the 20th century.
The V2 was an impressive technical achievement, but the guidance systems available were never good enough to make it militarily effective. It could hit something the size of London, maybe, but not anything more precise than that. Germany expended enormous resources building something that could wreck things and kill people, but couldn't affect the change the outcome of the war. More people died building them than were killed by them.
14:35 - honestly, probably. Wasser fall in particular would have been the death knell to the combined bomber offensive as there isn’t a counter for it with 1940s technology. And if the V2 had been given the support it needed earlier on, the Germans could have threatened Soviet industry behind the urals with it, or even bomb ports needed to support D-day later on in souther England, which may have severely crippled the Normandy breakout later on too.
Actually, there were counters. WasserFall was manually guided. Not too useful at night and flares could disrupt the sight. Its radar guided follow-up could be countered by chad and by the already existing US Navy BAT, a radar guided glide bomb that had sunk Japanese shipping at up to 37km away. Change its frequency to match the Germans and you have an anti-radar homing bomb.
Also worth mentioning is that; Fat Man was 10 times heavier than the pay load delivery of the A4. Even if the Germans would have been able to build a nuclear bomb, it wouldn't have fit on the rocket.
10x heavier fat man yes but in V2 no need for bomb casing so not 10x but not a serious option in 1945 for technical reasons and nazis years away from getting a nuke
Yeah, but advance that technology a bit and here we are. Watching this video was like listening to Zuul in the body of Dana from Ghostbusters. We got to, "Choose the form of your destructor"
@@Eric-kn4yn Most of the "shielding" on Fat Man was a "reflector" designed to direct the conventional explosions such that a hollow, and, thus, sub-critical Plutonium sphere could be compressed in to a much smaller solid sphere, causing it to achieve prompt criticality and the resultant nuclear explosion. It was inherent to the design of the detonation sequence.
The Germans had atomic warheads during the war. These were placed on two-stage rockets much larger than the V-2. At the end, the threat of massive Allied retaliation led to a deal with the man heading the German advanced weapons program, SS General Hans Kammler. The Americans were given German atomic bombs and warheads in exchange for allowing General Kammler to avoid prosecution.
One reason the German military was interested in long range rockets before the war is that unlike artillery rockets weren’t proscribed by the Treaty of Versailles. They could be worked on openly without any problems.
In the book Hitler's Scientists, the author John Cornwell wrote an account of what it was like to be on the receiving end of the V-2 strikes; I particularly remember his remark that the rocket would suddenly detonate, without warning, and it was only afterwards that you could hear the "whoosh" as the sound of the rocket's flight caught up to the impact site. It's easy to imagine why they were so demoralizing, despite the fact that there were comparatively few of them given the material shortages and production problems that plagued them throughout their use in the war. In another book I read on World War II (I think it was Stephen Ambrose's book on D-Day), the historian remarked that the V-2 would have been much more effective if it had been used against harbors that the western Allies were using to transport men, equipment and supplies into France, rather than targeting London, which in spite of its psychological effect was not going to seriously disrupt the Allied war effort (I think he remarked that Hitler authorized targeting London with the V-2 on D-Day itself, but I'm not sure I'm remembering that correctly). Rocket technology would obviously have had a much greater impact if Germany had prioritized it earlier, but although I won't speculate too much, I don't think it would've changed the outcome of the war.
Richard Evans mentions in his trilogy of the 3rd Reich that 20,000 workers died making the rockets, which were fewer that were killed by them directly.
I live in Huntsville, Alabama, his home in the US. You would assume half the city is named after him. Our hockey stadium, the largest complex on the Army Redstone Arsenal. It is strange, because we accept the dark history of the technology that made out city, and the evil past of those who helped build it, yet we believe there is something beautiful about adapting a technology designed to kill into one that may one day save our planet. History should never and will never forgive Von Braun for the evils he KNOWINGLY oversaw, but I believe Huntsville, and its position as the centerpoint of rocketry R&D in the US, stands as a testement to the value of second chances and the belief in even bad people's ability to do good when you help them along the path
Second chance? Von Braun just did what he had always done. Build rockets. It's not like the man became a "good guy" suddenly. There's no reason to think that he wouldn't have used slave labor if given the chance later in his life, nor that he wouldn't settle for ICBM's if he hadn't been given the saturn program. He was an opportunist, with very few scrupules.
The Germans did have ICBMs with atomic warheads. They also had underground missile silos. The designer of the silos was located and sent to the United States. He was employed by a company that was a contractor for the Army Corps of Engineers.
While the V2 was an impressive technological achievement as a weapon it proved pretty much useless and has the dubious distinction of killing more German workers then enemy. The Dora slave labor conditions were truly horrendous. Operation Paperclip that sought to round up as many German rocket scientists as possible before the Russians could and sweep the involvement of slave labor under the rug is an oft overlooked aspect of post WWII history. The previous posts about Tom Lehrer's ode to Werner Von Braun is dead on.
The idea that some gee-whiz gizmo is going to save a war after squandering the lives of probably about a million of your own troops with bonehead orders not to retreat is ridiculous. By 1944, their armies were stretched so thin and were so misallocated (Courland, Norway, Yugoslavia) that the downfall was already inescapable.
With attacking London with the V1 and V2, he made the same mistake he made during the Battle of Britain. Although Londoners suffered, he let the military off the hook. If he'd gone after the Channel Ports, he would have caused headaches for the invasion (My opinion) A side happening, Raymond Baxter (TV presenter, Farnborough Air Show and Tomorrow's World) was a wartime pilot. He told of the time he engaged a V2 taking off with his Meteor jet. When he got back to base, he realised how lucky he was to have failed
They shot many missiles toward Antwerp in fact the sent more missiles at Antwerp than any other target except London. It did not stop supplies going through the port.
Well, since you asked, I feel like the Allies would have responded in kind and the war would have had similar results. In the end, Germany would never have enough raw materials or manpower to take on the combined might of the Big Three.
8 місяців тому
Nice that Indy said "Flak-Rocket", which is how the Germans called them back then. When friends of mine did that on their german channel there was an uproar form the community :)
Germany lost not just because the Allies were winning on every front, but also massively due to bureaucratic bungling. If they deployed the V2 and the ME262 earlier on, it may have delayed the war further and bought them time.
No matter the case, the Nazis lacked production, industry, raw materials and manpower. It may have been more painful, but once Barbarossa launched and once the allies decided to support the USSR, the fate of the war was settled.
From a military point of view--the rockets, without an atomic bomb, to put in them, were too expensive and still too crude to in terms of accuracy and bomb load to justify the cost of their production. The resources for the production would have been better spent on jet plane research and production or U boat research rather these one shot weapons that cost more than the bombers they were replacing. The pulse jet unmanned V-1s were especially wasteful as the Germans were better off researching better technology and then putting them in planes rather than wasting them on a futile terror campaign.
Imagine if the war didn't start until 1950. Germany would have built ICBM's Would have made the Atomic Bomb, and had Jet fighters and bombers too. It was our luck that Hitler was a fool, and started a war Germany was destined to lose, despite the fact that Germany was technologically advancing at a greater rate than it's rivals.
The Natter, a vertical launch rocket with a pilot and a salvo of small rockets in the nose, was essentially a guided missile with a human guidance system. After firing the salvo of rockets the pilot would bail out and the Natter would also have a parachute for recovery. The Natter would land kind of hard and wreck the cheap outer body but the rocket engine and various parts were used over again. If this had been mass produced, it would have made the four-engine heavy bomber offensive impossible. The Natter was one of the few true "wonder weapons" that might have made a difference.
Get the book by Brett Gooden, Natter - Manned Missile of the Third Reich. I have seen an unpublished photo of a number of Natters in a field with their camouflage covering removed.
The war critical invention was the proximity fuze. First tested sucessfully in April,1945. It costed 320 rounds per shot down bomber. Production would have devastated the bombers.
Three technical corrections re the V2 (A4): 1) The fuels going through the turbopump were liquids, rather than gases: Liquefied oxygen (A-Stoff) and a mixture of alcohol and water (B-Stoff) 2) The turbopump was powered by steam generated through decomposition of highly-concentrated hydrogen peroxide (T-Stoff). Sodium permanganate served as a catalyst for peroxide decomposition - these two materials were not a "mixture", as such a mixture would instantly decompose. 3) the Wasserfall anti-aircraft missile was not designed "to find the target and detonate on its own"- it was guided by a human operator ("Command to Line Of Sight"- CLOS), and the detonation command was also issued from the ground, as the Germans did not have a proximity fuse that could do the job.
The most essential part was the turbo pump. Even today, this pump is heart of every liquid rocket. Some say rockets are turbopumps, with nozzels and a tank
The thing is: had they priorizied certain things earlier, or waited with the start of the war until certain things were ready, the allies would have noticed and had more time themselves. Of course a working V2 in high numbers would be quite manacing for the allies as they were, but such a big program would have been picked up easily, and therefore the allies with their vast resources would have been prepared, too...
Another interesting place connected to V2 is "La Coupole" - a giant silo/underground base in northern France that was being built in order to launch dozens of missiles a day ( en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Coupole)
Goring witnessed a test launch of the V2 rocket. He was impressed by it and wanted to parade it around after the war. He still thought Germany was somehow going to pull through and was dreaming of military parades.
The cost of producing each V2 exceeded the cost to the war effort of the enemy (the British) by it hitting its intended target - a random point of London. While the V1 caused widespread destruction, the V2 buried itself deeply before exploding, so it would blow one building to smithereens but leave surrounding property only moderately damaged.
The war was unwinnable from the start. Projects that took funds away from other things which would needlessly prolong the war for the Nazis were the best things that could happen to Germany.
"Missiles and winged weapons... this last I regard as the most criminal artifice that has been devised by the human mind; for, as if to bring death upon man with still greater rapidity, we have given wings to iron and taught it to fly." - Pliny the Elder
I read the V1 campaign in itself was about as effective as the blitz was, and it certainly made the allies commit a hell of a lot of resources to deal with them. I think the germans themselves probably underestimated how useful its effects were.
The V1 were vulnerable to interception and destruc tion. It could only carry a 1000 ton warhead. A single 4 engine bomber could carry many more 1000 ton bombs and the Allies attacked with 1000 plane raids. Also the V1 never destroyed an armament factory or a significant military formation. It could only hit a large city without knowing where in the city it would land. It was purely an instrument of terror and did not break the morale of the British.
Wernher von Braun was a member of the SS and visited the notorious Mittelwerk underground factory where slave labourers worked in atrocious conditions to build his rockets. But, after being plucked from Europe by the United States, von Braun will take NASA to the moon. By the end of his career, he’ll have been decorated by both Hitler and US President Gerald Ford.
What a strange career hmm!
Lol the council of walters
Mister Vorldvide
"I vass only a pastry chef in de SS...a very BAD pastry chef!!"
- from Billy Wilder's "One! Two! Three!"
"Gather 'round while I sing you of Wernher von Braun
A man whose allegiance
Is ruled by expedience
Call him a Nazi, he won't even frown
"Nazi, Schmazi!" says Wernher von Braun
Don't say that he's hypocritical
Say rather that he's apolitical
"Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?
That's not my department!" says Wernher von Braun"
-Tom Lehrer
Germany: "What are your qualifications?"
Engineer: "My name is Walter."
Are you a pole valter
You can't imagine just how funny I find your comment. My late German grandfather's name was Walter. He was an engineer and worked in the German armaments industry during the war.
Waltuh.
@@mikethespike7579 and it looks like U didnt get-Walter.Looks like your`s grandpa bad blood didnt die.Some karma in a bad way will hit You,so.Its just works like this.
@@alanreid3063 ?
You forgot to mention that the German army was interested in rockets, even before Hitler came to power and scrapped the treaty of Versailles, becasue the treaty of Versailles didn't say anything about the Gernam army not being allowed to use rockets.
They scrapped it because it said nothing about it????
Well, he did say most of that. But it’s unlikely it was the treaty that was the main impetus for this. These were basically a replacement for the very heavy artillery the Germans favored. But it wasn’t thought to be practical, which is why the program had hiccups in support.
@@monza1002000No, he means, the Germans were interested in rocketry before the Nazis denounced the treaty.
No because Hitler scrapped the treaty they no longer had the same incentive to research and produce rockets is what he said. I misread it first too 😅
Bro he literrally said that the german army was intrested in rocketry before Hitler like the first thing he did
1:25
The V2 rocket has the dubious distinction of being the only weapon that killed more people while being built than when actually used.
German advances during the war can be summed up with "This is a great idea. Would have been better 5 years ago."
You could say that about quite literally any military invention.
@@_ArsNova
The main caveat being the implementation of such war changing weaponry was postponed or deemed unnecessary for short term success. Which was a defining factor of The German War industry and decision making in WW2
So no you cant extrapolate that to ‘every other military’
Britain wanted tanks in ww1? They got tanks within a relatively short timeframe
America wanted a nuclear bomb? They got that within the alloted timeframe
Etc and so forth .
+ I mean the video demonstrates how the German war industry fluctuated - with Hitler initially scoffing at V2
Barbarosa should have been delayed. They thought they were superior to the soviets. Hubris lost the war.
@@YedolfWesler The German generals did indeed wanted Hitler to neutralise the British in the Middle East before launching Barbarossa. The capture of the Suez Canal was high on their lists of priorities.
I think they overlooked that sending the sort of force to North Africa necessary to achieve that required a major amphibious operation which would be very vulnerable. Otherwise persuade Turkey to join the War on the Axis side, or simply invade Turkey, to reach the rest of the Middle East by land. Not an easy undertaking.
Also, although Stalin had his head in the sand re Hitler's intentions, Molotov did not. Molotov distrusted Hitler and the Nazis from Day 1 of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Treaty In 1940 the USSR had embarked on another 5 Year Plan to build up its military, and would have been much more ready by say late 1942-43 than they were in 1941.
@@YedolfWesler Well they where, just not in NUMBERS. And Numbers still win the game.
So nice to watch uninterrupted WITHOUT the stupid UA-cam commercials. Yay for Time Ghost!
Indeed it is! -TimeGhost Ambassador
Adblocker Ultimate. Or use Brave on phone.
Never seen any kind of commercials.
Get an adblocker
@@alsanchez5038They are kind of like short films that advertise products and/or services, you aren't missing much.
"'Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?
That's not my department,'
Says Wernher von Braun."
some have harsh words for this man of renown,
but some think our attitude should be one of gratitude,
like the widows and cripples in old london town,
who owe their large pensions to Wernher von Braun
Call him a naz* he won't even frown
Naz* Schatzie
Says Werhner von Braun
@@pnutz_2You too may be a big hero,
Once you've learned to count backwards to zero.
"In German oder English I know how to count down,
Und I'm learning Chinese," says Wernher von Braun!
@@pnutz_2 Another artist even did an updated version: ua-cam.com/video/NdVCHWCunZY/v-deo.html
‘Widows and cripples in old London Town owe their pensions to Werner von Braun.’
1:57 Walter was like: "Hey Walter, shall we join up?" And Walter was like, "Let's ask Walter". And Walter was like, "Walter, why Walter?" and Walter was like: "If Walter's in, I'm in." And so Walter was like, "Walter, are you in?" And Walter was like "I already said, ask Walter." But Walter was like, "No, other Walter." But Walter didn't answer because he still thought he was talking to the other Walter. And so advancement in German rocketry was delayed by several minutes.
Lol
von Braun wrote a book after his time with NASA, I think it was called “I aimed at the stars, but hit a hospital in Hackney”.
I saw part of the film about the film. Curt Jurgens portrayed Von Braun.
all else aside, the title is hilarious
"I make the rockets go up, where they come down is none of my concern"
Oof
That was possibly the least bad war crime Werner Von Braun was involved in.
My father was a kid on occupied Holland south of Rotterdam, and he saw a V2 launch pad set up across the river Maas. That soon scared the neighborhood, because of the high rate of failed missiles falling all over the place. He said the missiles often ended in fields or splashed in the river, once almost destroying their bridge.
After Market-Garden (or before) the Germans V2 pad site was abandoned.
FYI: after the war their island kept under unarmed german occupation a long time, due to disease outbreak (he said typhus) and quarantine.
The sabotage that many slave labourers did saved more lives that we can probably calculate.
Slave labour will get you only so far...
I'd have been far more worried about allied planes targeting the launch site. The allies were very watchful of where these V2s were being launched from and if they had an opportunity would target them and take out the whole area.
@@mikethespike7579 V2 launch pads were portable. The Allies couldn't figure out where they were being launched from. After the war, they realized why they had been unable to find the launch site(s).
We all know what we want after the WWII series come to end:
The 100 years war - week by week!
I will be more modest than the aim of the 100 year's war, which is in essence the culmination of medieval warfare.
I will settle (but for no less) than the 80 year's war of The Netherlands independence of the Spanish Empire. This is a war that has had many firsts and the birth of one of the first modern Republics of what is now one of the few remaining European monarchies. It featured the invention of modern Marines in naval warfare. The US Marines have the motto of 'Semper Fidelis' which means "Forever Faithfull'. The Dutch Marines have the very practical motto of "Qua Patet Orbis" roughly meaning "Wherever in the World".
The true and complete motto should read: "Qua Patet Orbis, Semper Fidelis.".
Even the use of Commandoes and modern army organization, combined operations, combat engineering and logistics were established during this conflict.
that boring
The 30 years war would probably be much more interesting, but going throu such long wars week by week would be absolutely overkill
im curious to see Indy and the team cover the Human-Cylon War from Battlestar Galactica...
I mean it can be done, not week by week of course 😅 but maybe week by year? is an a year of conflict in one weekly episode. 100 weeks to cover the whole thing.
It is somewhat interesting that the V2 rocket and Wasserfall missile would lay the groundwork postwar in the future for things like the cruise missile and the air to air missile, as well as rocketry missions to the Moon. The story of Wernher Von Braun is rather a storied one too, from assisting the Germans with the V2 rocket until later leading America's NASA with the design of the Saturn V to the moon in 1969. Thank you team for this Special episode as always!
Thanks a lot for watching and commenting! -TimeGhost Ambassador
Yup, V1 was the basis for future cruise missiles and V2 was the granddady of the Saturn V and the ICBM. The Wasserfall was the basis for SAMs.
don't forget the rocket launched subs! They led to sub launched Polaris and cruise missiles.
This is Robert Goddard erasure.
Indeed, the first picture of the earth taken from space was taken by a camera on a V2. It was launched at the White Sands Missile Range outside Alamogordo, NM in 1946.
I live in Wassenaar, South Holland in the Netherlands. The very first V2 rockets aimed at London were launched within 1km of my home, 8 september 1944. A few more were launched from the nearby forests in the following months. And a bunch were launched from The Hague and Rijswijk. They literally used a small crossroad covered by trees to launch the Rockets. It left burn marks on the trees there when it was launched. There is still a small memorial there.
There are a few websites that go into great detail about the launches, the launch sites, where they landed, the ones that failed during take off etc. Very interesting reads
My Dad was a Radar Guidance Engineer with G.E. Aerospace at Cape Canaveral from '56 thru '76 but before that he was teaching a Radar school at Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville for the army when Dr. Von Braun and his German scientists and engineers were there. My Dad would spoke fondly of Dr. von Braun's Friday night gatherings he would host at his house where all things rocketry were discussed.
I’m guessing he knew not to ask any awkward questions about the songs Werner and chums would gather round the piano and sing later in the evening!
@@GorgeDawes Up until the 1990s von Braun was only known for his pioneering work in Nazi Germany and later for his work at NASA. That he was also a decorated SS officer (which is not a war crime) and had a part in, or at least knew of the use of slave labour to manufacture his V2s, (which is a war crime) became public knowledge later. Most certainly the US government knew about this but the US space program was more important than punishing Nazi war criminals.
Great episode, kudos to your entire team!
Glad you enjoyed, thanks for watching!
Any discussion or what-if scenarios around Germany doing better prioritizing a wonder weapon or preserving military capacity on the eastern front or pushing back the allies or whatever. None of them lead to Germany winning world war 2. Instead it means that two nuclear bombs would be dropped on Germany instead of Japan in August 1945. Who was, from the inception, the intended target of the Manhatten project.
Also all of these wonder weapons seem primarily concerned with attacking the civilian population or preventing such attacks. It seems pretty clearly established to me that attacks on the civiliant populations are mostly irrelevant for the outcome of the war. Germany lost a land war and these wonder weapons would not do anything about that.
Well if they really did prioritize such rocket weapons, the planes carrying atomic bombs would be in big danger maybe.
Germany would not have surrendered if it got nuked. Even Japan wouldn't have surrendered in a less desperate military situation.
Rocket research and production was expensive, and as they show in the video, used a fair amount of resources. But really, it pales when compared to that spent on tanks, submarines, airplanes and the rest. But by the time this became viable, Germany was already reeling from their major defeats. Would these made the difference somewhere? No really. With a V2 having an accuracy of 7 kilometers, or more, they would be fairly useless against opposing armies. They would need hundreds of them in a single battle area. The ability to manufacturer that many and fuel them would have been impossible, much less doing it all along both fronts.
@@GRB-tj6ujyet they did…
Adolf Galland, General of the Fighter Force, was once asked if an earlier mass production of the Me262 jet fighter (which Galland himself flew in combat), could have changed the outcome of the war. His answer was "No, it would only have prolonged it, thus costing even more lives." I guess the same is true for the V1 and V2, especially as these were not accurate enough for tactical use.
V2 was a quite effective shock weapon due to the total lack of warning before it hit. I might have proven as effective as the atomic bomb if deployed in large enough numbers.
@MrWolfstar8 it would have taken a lot of rockets. It's probably just cheaper to develop atomic weapons.
@ The 262 had decent range and could use pretty much anything as fuel, it didnt need expensive and scarce high octane avgas.
Regarding engines, WW2 fighters didnt survive too long in combat, and the jets were FAR cheaper and faster to build than a piston engine.
The V1 was far more effective, since it could be intercepted the allies had to divert HUGE resources to try to counter them... and were also DIRT CHEAP.
There was no defense against the V2, so no allied expense, and the whole V2 program was more expensive than the manhattan Project.
If Germany had had the V2 in time for the Battle of Britain... the hopelessness of defending against it (not to mention the preservation of the Luftwaffe) might have completely changed Britain's willingness to keep fighting.
They even invented synthetic oil. The first assault rifle. The 9mm. The jet engine. The freeway. Methadone.
Due to both the Americans and Russians utilizing post war rocket technology and personnel from Germany; it was a standard joke that when an U.S. & USSR satellites would cross paths in orbit; they would greet each other in German. 14:57
Captured A4s were of course the foundation of the US and Soviet and UK rocket programs. During the war an A4 had reached a maximum altitude of over 160 kilometers, which is well into space. There was a British plan to put a man into space using an enlarged and extensively modified version of the A4. Unfortunately the British economy was in desperate shape and the government didn't fund this. If they had, a suborbital flight like Alan Shepard's could have been made ~8 years earlier and a Brit would have been the first person into space.
Please note: suborbital refers to speed, not altitude. It is relatively easy to launch a rocket into space (above 100 km). It's difficult to accelerate it enough to stay there in orbit, circling the Earth with out falling back down.
A less enthusiastic part of the British plan would be that the astronaut would return to earth at the speed of 1500 meters per second, far faster than tea...
@@penultimateh766 Sorry, YT cut off part of your reply. The Megaroc proposal aimed for a 300 km altitude but they could easily have dropped it to 120 km or so. The New Shepard capsule returns from over 100 km with little in the way of a heat shield, and certainly not an ablative one. I've never been able to find anything about what NS has at the base of the capsule, although the abort motor can tolerate being in contact with it.
Did the British have a large community interested in spaceflight? Guess that's not something I'd ever heard of. Of course there was no way their government would fund anything like that when their economy was still crippled from years of war - they were still rationing food well into the 1950's and didn't have their colonies to fall back on for resources anymore.
@@Raskolnikov70 At the time the Brits were very interested in space flight. They even had an official national space flight society that planned a moon landing and had designed a space suit for use on the moon. Needless to say, the Brits had other far more pressing things to do such as develop the British atom bomb after the US had refused to share the technology with them.
@@Raskolnikov70 Tom Scott has an interesting video here on YT called "The long-forgotten history of the British moon spacesuit."
The V2 was unlikely to win the war by itself.
At the end of the day, it was an artillery piece. Such things can be massively devastating and deadly, as The Great War showed. But they are strategically and tactically of little use unless the side firing them can follow up by putting 'boots on the ground' in the area that was just bombarded. Again, as The Great War showed time and again.
The biggest problem that Nazi Germany had (militarily speaking) is that they never once during all of WW2 demonstrated that they had a reasonable means to put 'boots on the ground' in England or the US. Which they needed to be able to do to win in the way Hitler wanted.
I agree with that. Who knows? By transferring resources to the V2, maybe the loss of resources to the Luftwaffe and Heer would have actually shortened the war.
@@rrice1705 I suspect it wouldn't have made a difference in the length. it should have made a difference, but as we've seen over the past six months, Hitler had been increasingly micromanaging the Wehrmacht. Even to the point of overruling his generals when they come up with good ideas for defending Germany, in favor of a mindless meat grinder defense that Germany cannot possibly keep up. And then, there was that fiasco with the Battle of the Bulge.
Hitler's wasteful management of the Wehrmacht is the main factor in why the war lasted as long as it did. Without the V2, the Wehrmacht would have had more tanks and planes. But they would have been managed just as poorly.
To put 'boots on the ground' in England one only needs little rubber boats now. USA now has on its soil a huge foreign army which had only to walk over the border . . .
@@EllieMaes-Grandad now, that may be true. But back in WW2, it required an operation of the scope of D Day. Complete with specialized landing craft, mulberry harbors, and both air and naval superiority over the English Channel.
DDay happened because by June 6, 1944, the Western Allies had all these things. Nazi Germany never had all these things, and never really had given themselves the chance to get all these things.
Such an insightful comment! The biggest problem Germany had was they couldn’t invade England, the us, or take the Soviets, great comment
Cinema Rex in Antwerp, Belgium would have been a good mention in this video. On Dec 16th (the first day of the Ardenne offensive) a V2 landed on the movie theater. Taking the lives of 567 people, and marking it the deadliest V2 attack ever.
Yes, they did rather heavily focus on London despite more V2's actually being fired at Antwerp.
@@Ascoyned focus is on theatrics not serious accademic work history guy is better
Market garden never mentioned but was it to try capture V2 launching sites in holland used to bombard england
It was about getting across the Rhine before winter; anything else would have been a bonus of course. @@Eric-kn4yn
When I was 17 years old, my father took me on a vacation to Europe. When we were in Antwerp, we walked past the "Rex Cinema," as my father called it, and he pointed it out to me as if the name should be as familiar to me as "Pearl Harbor." I just looked at him quizzically and asked, "Yes? And?" He got a dejected look on his face and replied, "I was gonna go to movie there once--but I didn't."
The newspapers didn't report on the V2 attacks because they didn't want to help the Germans improve their aim. That makes it difficult to find out information about specific V2 attacks today (at least in my experience).
Another notable V2 attack on Antwerp was at Teniersplaats on November 27, with 157 deaths and more than 300 wounded. The water main was ruptured in that attack, flooding the street. The blood from all the dead and wounded stained the water red, giving an apocalyptic feel to the scene.
Indy should have said "point of impact" instead of "target". Making a 14 meter hole somewhere within a 7 kilometer circle does not really count as hitting a target.
If your target was to hit England, it was a success
One wonder weapon wouldn't change the outcome of the whole war - except atomic bomb.
That being said I remember reading that V-1 was actually a very good weapon for one reason: it was very cost effective. Yes, it could be spotted and shot down easily, but making sure they would be downed in numbers required a lot of AA guns and resources - much more than the bomb itself did cost.
Same with the launching ramps - yeah, they could be bombed, but the could be defended by AA therefore making their destruction also somehow expensive.
The V-2 was the polar opposite: very technologically advanced, with no possible defense against it, but as Indy mentioned - very, VERY expensive, to the point that it was hardly worth it, actually.
Honestly, sounds like the V-1 is how drones are used in Ukraine now
@@jmjedi923
Yes in many ways the V1 and V2 was the worlds first drones.
The V1 used an auto-pilot and a speed log for steering and range whereas the V2 used inertial navigation instead (the first operational use of inertial navigation).
And it is correct that the V1 was an economical way to put 1000 kg of explosives on a target 200 km distant, and as originally planned by the Luftwaffe the V1 was to have been volley-launched in order to saturate the English air defences as they fully knew that the V1 was not invulnerable.
Unfortunately for the Germans (and fortunately for London) they could not produce enough and was at that time so heavily bombed that they could not reach the planned production targets and synchronisation of launches.
V-2 was a ballistic missile. It means,that ,well,as we say today ,it should be used against high value targets . London fits ,but,only if army HQs and major political and production centers were to be aimed .
V-1 on the other hand ,is not a drone ,but missile with wings ,if used properly, it's even deadlier than v-2. Which ,it was . So...
Yep, that's a good way to put it.
@@bekakharaishvili3978
Wernher Von Braun….we aimed for the stars, but somehow kept hitting London😂
Hitler:how much money marks do you need?
Von braun: it's not rocket science all of them
Learning about ww2 is always fun, but if this channel was about when i grew up, id probably have became a historian. These dudes are so cool.
An in depth series on von Braun would be most appreciated !
Great stuff as usual
An absolutely amazing piece of technology, that pushed rocketry forward in so many dimensions at once. I have always been fascinated by how German scientists were able to synthesize such a complex propellant system, with something as a sophisticated as an automated, electronic, gyroscopic guidance system in the early 1940s. There are few points in history where such rapid technological advances took place over so many fields as in WWII.
“Necessity brings innovations, and nothing can compete necessities as war”
It was amazing how close Nobel Prize Winner Heisenberg was to developing a functional atomic model. But he wasn't supported by Hitler. After the War, Heisenberg was still disappointed that he hadn't perfected the bomb instead of Oppenheimer. I saw this in a German documentary film.
A model yes but no reactor or ability to produce enriched uranium necessary for a bomb.
Heisenberg didn't believe the Americans had developed a deploy-able atomic bomb when told about it after Hiroshima. His calculations on the amount of fissile material needed was so far off that no plane of WWII would have been able to carry it, let alone any missile the could have been produced by war's end.
There were many German scientists in the German atomic program. Heisenberg and the others were drafted into a high secret military project. They had no say over anything. Scientists like Manfred von Ardenne would develop a superior uranium separation process. They succeeded where the Americans failed.
I was nearly killed by one of these V2s just after 4 pm on 22nd November 1944 but it missed by about 200 yards
Note: ~182m for the metric folk
Could you tell us the story in detail? I'd love to hear it.
The timing of this special is fitting.
Last week was the 25th anniversary of the biographical movie that was about one of Wernher von Braun's big fans (and his friends) and his journey from growing up in a small coal mining town in WV to beginning his journey toward rocket science and eventually being a part of NASA.
That fan: Homer Hickam
That movie: October Sky
Jake Gyllenhaal plays Homer in the movie.
I have to admit that a V2 carrying submarine sounds scary as hell.
That's what the submarine sailors said.
Fun Fact.Helicopters were first used in combat areas to evacuate wounded soldiers during the burma campaign in 1945.😊
Dear Indy and entire TimeGhost team thank you once again for the superb, in depth videos about the war, from which I as a history nerd have learned and am still learning so much!
To chime in on the conversation, as you said Indy, it's still so bloody scary to see how close the nazis actually were with some of their inventions!
I just realised I live 1 kilometer from a V2-launch site in Rijswijk, the Netherlands
Hm, You and more than a few others. Don't get cocky!
So what , are there any V2 there ?
Nothing to be cocky about but many civilians died because of the bombing of the mobile launcher the Germans hid in residential areas.@@Centurion101B3C
Goofy aah country 😂😂😂
From about 8:30 to 10:00 Indy just rattling off specs and intricate details with no notes about the V2.
After watching for years, it finally hit me, Indy is the World's Smartest Man, as he can talk about so many subjects from memory without notes. I bet he even knows Ty Cobb's Batting Average.
All those ressources that von Braun wasted count as mitigating circumstances on his record. Imagine all that effort had gone towards a German long-range bomber (same price as the V2, but reusable.) Building the V2 instead of a bomber might in sum have saved many lives.
That is an interesting point, one that reflects in my opinion the structural weak points of National Sozialism. Göring as head of The luftwaffe appointed his personal friend Ernst Udet as "Generalluftzeugmeister", responsible for the research and deployment of new weapons. Udet, as a former pilot, wanted the long-range bombers to have dive-bombing capabilities, which was not viable and further development was stopped. I think there is a chapter on this in Richard Overy's "Why the Allies Won" (just one example).
-TimeGhost Ambassador
Ah, finally a story after my own heart. (I'm one of those people who, when they hear V-2, automatically think A-4.)
Werhner von Braun: The rocket worked perfectly, but it fell on the wrong planet.
The v2 had about the same chances of winning the war as Steiner's counter attack
A biographical film about von Braun came out in the early 60s called "I Aim for the Stars." The reviewers replied "and sometimes London!"
“A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.” - Thomas Pynchon
10:18 Great jumpin’ Jesus, that’s the first time I’ve ever seen a V2 explosion on film.
I went to college (Alabama A&M University) in Huntsville, AL, and I first noticed the city has a convention center named after him *_Von Braun Center_* because of his work at NASA/US Military installation Redstone Arsenal which also has a building named for him on site (which is also located in the area).
You forgot to mention, that polish Armia Krajowa captured a test V2, which felt into the river of Bug, close to Menżenin village on beginning of 1944. The rocket miraculously did not explode. AK firts hid the rocket in the river, then after the Germans gave up with searching for it, disassembled it, prepared drawings and sent the papers and most important parts to UK. The UK intelligence named this action „MOST III”.
Mostly correct - except the parts were first examined by a polish scientist and hidden in the apartment of a wehrmacht officer!
@@PlayerFalcon4 This is quite interesting. I never heard about engagement of the German Officer in this case. Can you please give more info about it?
@os78The german officer was an unwitting accomplice. If you search youtube for The Secret War, an old BBC documentary, it goes into much greater detail.
@@PlayerFalcon4 Found this doc and exact moment: ua-cam.com/video/GJCF-Ufapu8/v-deo.html The german officer of course was not engaged, and idea of conducting the examination in his rarly habbited flat was brave and brilliant - why in the world the germans would search for parts of missing V2 among themself? Thanks for pointing out this detail.
@@maciejos78You are most welcome. TBH this little factoid ticks all my boxes - aviation, espionage and technology, and how they overlapped during the 20th century.
The V2 was an impressive technical achievement, but the guidance systems available were never good enough to make it militarily effective. It could hit something the size of London, maybe, but not anything more precise than that. Germany expended enormous resources building something that could wreck things and kill people, but couldn't affect the change the outcome of the war. More people died building them than were killed by them.
It was effective alright.
14:35 - honestly, probably.
Wasser fall in particular would have been the death knell to the combined bomber offensive as there isn’t a counter for it with 1940s technology.
And if the V2 had been given the support it needed earlier on, the Germans could have threatened
Soviet industry behind the urals with it, or even bomb ports needed to support D-day later on in souther England, which may have severely crippled the Normandy breakout later on too.
Actually, there were counters. WasserFall was manually guided. Not too useful at night and flares could disrupt the sight. Its radar guided follow-up could be countered by chad and by the already existing US Navy BAT, a radar guided glide bomb that had sunk Japanese shipping at up to 37km away. Change its frequency to match the Germans and you have an anti-radar homing bomb.
The Wasserfall became operational.
Also worth mentioning is that; Fat Man was 10 times heavier than the pay load delivery of the A4. Even if the Germans would have been able to build a nuclear bomb, it wouldn't have fit on the rocket.
10x heavier fat man yes but in V2 no need for bomb casing so not 10x but not a serious option in 1945 for technical reasons and nazis years away from getting a nuke
Yeah, but advance that technology a bit and here we are. Watching this video was like listening to Zuul in the body of Dana from Ghostbusters. We got to, "Choose the form of your destructor"
Well without a bomb, they had no idea how much the missiles needed to lift.
@@Eric-kn4yn Most of the "shielding" on Fat Man was a "reflector" designed to direct the conventional explosions such that a hollow, and, thus, sub-critical Plutonium sphere could be compressed in to a much smaller solid sphere, causing it to achieve prompt criticality and the resultant nuclear explosion. It was inherent to the design of the detonation sequence.
The Germans had atomic warheads during the war. These were placed on two-stage rockets much larger than the V-2. At the end, the threat of massive Allied retaliation led to a deal with the man heading the German advanced weapons program, SS General Hans Kammler. The Americans were given German atomic bombs and warheads in exchange for allowing General Kammler to avoid prosecution.
- "I aim for the moon. Only sometimes I hit London..."
W. Von Braun
Werner Von Braun aimed for the stars but usually hit London.
One reason the German military was interested in long range rockets before the war is that unlike artillery rockets weren’t proscribed by the Treaty of Versailles. They could be worked on openly without any problems.
Thanks Indy!
A sobering look at what really was and a terrifying glimpse into what may have been. Fantastic research and wonderful video!
If you want to know everything technically about the V2/A4 the UA-cam channel Astronomy and Nature TV has an incredibly in depth series.
One reason why Allied Intelligence killed any plans to bump off Hitler, was that his *genius* was actually aiding the Allied war effort.
My Aunt remembered the V-1, or "doodlebug" as she called it. She would count the seconds after the engine stopped, and hear the explosion.
In the book Hitler's Scientists, the author John Cornwell wrote an account of what it was like to be on the receiving end of the V-2 strikes; I particularly remember his remark that the rocket would suddenly detonate, without warning, and it was only afterwards that you could hear the "whoosh" as the sound of the rocket's flight caught up to the impact site. It's easy to imagine why they were so demoralizing, despite the fact that there were comparatively few of them given the material shortages and production problems that plagued them throughout their use in the war.
In another book I read on World War II (I think it was Stephen Ambrose's book on D-Day), the historian remarked that the V-2 would have been much more effective if it had been used against harbors that the western Allies were using to transport men, equipment and supplies into France, rather than targeting London, which in spite of its psychological effect was not going to seriously disrupt the Allied war effort (I think he remarked that Hitler authorized targeting London with the V-2 on D-Day itself, but I'm not sure I'm remembering that correctly). Rocket technology would obviously have had a much greater impact if Germany had prioritized it earlier, but although I won't speculate too much, I don't think it would've changed the outcome of the war.
I'm currently reading Thomas Pynchon's novel Gravity's Rainbow, which paints a dark picture of life in Britain under the shadow of the V2 attacks.
Great video, thanks!
This was the video I've been waiting for. Thanks!
Richard Evans mentions in his trilogy of the 3rd Reich that 20,000 workers died making the rockets, which were fewer that were killed by them directly.
I live in Huntsville, Alabama, his home in the US. You would assume half the city is named after him. Our hockey stadium, the largest complex on the Army Redstone Arsenal. It is strange, because we accept the dark history of the technology that made out city, and the evil past of those who helped build it, yet we believe there is something beautiful about adapting a technology designed to kill into one that may one day save our planet. History should never and will never forgive Von Braun for the evils he KNOWINGLY oversaw, but I believe Huntsville, and its position as the centerpoint of rocketry R&D in the US, stands as a testement to the value of second chances and the belief in even bad people's ability to do good when you help them along the path
Second chance? Von Braun just did what he had always done. Build rockets. It's not like the man became a "good guy" suddenly. There's no reason to think that he wouldn't have used slave labor if given the chance later in his life, nor that he wouldn't settle for ICBM's if he hadn't been given the saturn program. He was an opportunist, with very few scrupules.
Thank you for the lesson.
Could y'all do a video on the Navajo Code talkers?
Two missiles per heavy bomber is actually fairly impressive until you remember how large the bomber raids were.
"had already figured in the earth's rotation and curvature"
My man, flat earthers will hate that.
Heck, WW1 artillery fire included earth curvature and rotation, with enough range.
@@ZaprozhanWaits for the flat earthers to arrive. 🧁
@@Jezza_One Flat Earth people usually aren't literate enough to watch this series...
Eh, flat earthers do have one point: a flat earth don’t have time zones.
Technically, a flat Earth could still rotate, like a record with the North Pole as the spindle.
I read somewhere that more forced workers were killed in the
production of the V2 then people were killed at the target.
Thanks TGA.
Imagine if they also didn't bail on the atomic bomb program. It's terrifying to think what could have happened if they had ICBM nukes
The Germans did have ICBMs with atomic warheads. They also had underground missile silos. The designer of the silos was located and sent to the United States. He was employed by a company that was a contractor for the Army Corps of Engineers.
I aim for the stars….but sometimes I hit London.
Thanks!
Thank you very much!
While the V2 was an impressive technological achievement as a weapon it proved pretty much useless and has the dubious distinction of killing more German workers then enemy. The Dora slave labor conditions were truly horrendous. Operation Paperclip that sought to round up as many German rocket scientists as possible before the Russians could and sweep the involvement of slave labor under the rug is an oft overlooked aspect of post WWII history. The previous posts about Tom Lehrer's ode to Werner Von Braun is dead on.
Tom Bower's book, "Paperclip Conspiracy", examined selection of those guilty of war crimes but not prosecuted, being deemed useful to the USA.
The idea that some gee-whiz gizmo is going to save a war after squandering the lives of probably about a million of your own troops with bonehead orders not to retreat is ridiculous. By 1944, their armies were stretched so thin and were so misallocated (Courland, Norway, Yugoslavia) that the downfall was already inescapable.
With attacking London with the V1 and V2, he made the same mistake he made during the Battle of Britain.
Although Londoners suffered, he let the military off the hook.
If he'd gone after the Channel Ports, he would have caused headaches for the invasion (My opinion)
A side happening, Raymond Baxter (TV presenter, Farnborough Air Show and Tomorrow's World) was a wartime pilot.
He told of the time he engaged a V2 taking off with his Meteor jet.
When he got back to base, he realised how lucky he was to have failed
They shot many missiles toward Antwerp in fact the sent more missiles at Antwerp than any other target except London. It did not stop supplies going through the port.
Well, since you asked, I feel like the Allies would have responded in kind and the war would have had similar results. In the end, Germany would never have enough raw materials or manpower to take on the combined might of the Big Three.
Nice that Indy said "Flak-Rocket", which is how the Germans called them back then.
When friends of mine did that on their german channel there was an uproar form the community :)
It's weird to hear about the ruins in the woods around my village in a UA-cam video
The cruise missile and the ballistic missile. The two versions still used today. These guys were amazing.
Germany lost not just because the Allies were winning on every front, but also massively due to bureaucratic bungling. If they deployed the V2 and the ME262 earlier on, it may have delayed the war further and bought them time.
The V2 was a useless terror weapon, but guided flak rockets could gave made a huge strategic impact if mass produced by ‘43.
I feel like I am watching the Tale of the many Walter's.
No matter the case, the Nazis lacked production, industry, raw materials and manpower. It may have been more painful, but once Barbarossa launched and once the allies decided to support the USSR, the fate of the war was settled.
From a military point of view--the rockets, without an atomic bomb, to put in them, were too expensive and still too crude to in terms of accuracy and bomb load to justify the cost of their production. The resources for the production would have been better spent on jet plane research and production or U boat research rather these one shot weapons that cost more than the bombers they were replacing. The pulse jet unmanned V-1s were especially wasteful as the Germans were better off researching better technology and then putting them in planes rather than wasting them on a futile terror campaign.
Rockets larger than the V-2 existed, and with atomic warheads.
What a great podcast!
It’s odd that Hitler and Nukes kinda existed in different worlds.
Not true. Hitler was very interested in better, more advanced rockets and developing atomic bombs.
Imagine if the war didn't start until 1950. Germany would have built ICBM's Would have made the Atomic Bomb, and had Jet fighters and bombers too.
It was our luck that Hitler was a fool, and started a war Germany was destined to lose, despite the fact that Germany was technologically advancing at a greater rate than it's rivals.
The Natter, a vertical launch rocket with a pilot and a salvo of small rockets in the nose, was essentially a guided missile with a human guidance system. After firing the salvo of rockets the pilot would bail out and the Natter would also have a parachute for recovery. The Natter would land kind of hard and wreck the cheap outer body but the rocket engine and various parts were used over again. If this had been mass produced, it would have made the four-engine heavy bomber offensive impossible. The Natter was one of the few true "wonder weapons" that might have made a difference.
Get the book by Brett Gooden, Natter - Manned Missile of the Third Reich. I have seen an unpublished photo of a number of Natters in a field with their camouflage covering removed.
thanks man!@@AlexMarciniszyn-y1k
The war critical invention was the proximity fuze. First tested sucessfully in April,1945. It costed 320 rounds per shot down bomber. Production would have devastated the bombers.
Three technical corrections re the V2 (A4):
1) The fuels going through the turbopump were liquids, rather than gases: Liquefied oxygen (A-Stoff) and a mixture of alcohol and water (B-Stoff)
2) The turbopump was powered by steam generated through decomposition of highly-concentrated hydrogen peroxide (T-Stoff). Sodium permanganate served as a catalyst for peroxide decomposition - these two materials were not a "mixture", as such a mixture would instantly decompose.
3) the Wasserfall anti-aircraft missile was not designed "to find the target and detonate on its own"- it was guided by a human operator ("Command to Line Of Sight"- CLOS), and the detonation command was also issued from the ground, as the Germans did not have a proximity fuse that could do the job.
That is accurate but in the case of the Wasserfall, a similar method was used with the air-launched missile the Allies called Fritz-X.
The most essential part was the turbo pump. Even today, this pump is heart of every liquid rocket.
Some say rockets are turbopumps, with nozzels and a tank
The thing is: had they priorizied certain things earlier, or waited with the start of the war until certain things were ready, the allies would have noticed and had more time themselves.
Of course a working V2 in high numbers would be quite manacing for the allies as they were, but such a big program would have been picked up easily, and therefore the allies with their vast resources would have been prepared, too...
Another interesting place connected to V2 is "La Coupole" - a giant silo/underground base in northern France that was being built in order to launch dozens of missiles a day ( en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Coupole)
It was bombed and rendered inoperable.
"With weapons like this, surely there is no way the Allies can defeat us!" - Some German watching a V2 rocket being fired off in 1944
Goring witnessed a test launch of the V2 rocket. He was impressed by it and wanted to parade it around after the war. He still thought Germany was somehow going to pull through and was dreaming of military parades.
The cost of producing each V2 exceeded the cost to the war effort of the enemy (the British) by it hitting its intended target - a random point of London. While the V1 caused widespread destruction, the V2 buried itself deeply before exploding, so it would blow one building to smithereens but leave surrounding property only moderately damaged.
Thank you for clearing that point. I thought you mentioned just because of the rockets
The war was unwinnable from the start. Projects that took funds away from other things which would needlessly prolong the war for the Nazis were the best things that could happen to Germany.
"Missiles and winged weapons... this last I regard as the most criminal artifice that has been devised by the human mind; for, as if to bring death upon man with still greater rapidity, we have given wings to iron and taught it to fly."
- Pliny the Elder
I read the V1 campaign in itself was about as effective as the blitz was, and it certainly made the allies commit a hell of a lot of resources to deal with them. I think the germans themselves probably underestimated how useful its effects were.
The V1 were vulnerable to interception and destruc tion. It could only carry a 1000 ton warhead. A single 4 engine bomber could carry many more 1000 ton bombs and the Allies attacked with 1000 plane raids. Also the V1 never destroyed an armament factory or a significant military formation. It could only hit a large city without knowing where in the city it would land. It was purely an instrument of terror and did not break the morale of the British.
I figure you mean 1000kgs and not tons, that would have been impressive!@@caryblack5985