The problem is that these cops and security have no idea what engaging in lawful activity looks like. They put their costumes on every morning and think they can just tell people what to do if they don’t like it. Police in this country must be reformed and that starts with being educated. They must know where their lane is and stay in it.
I just found a Mr. Nast audit that I haven’t watched yet (I thought I had them all on my Mr. Nast binge)..Officer Friendly 😆😂🤣 You guys are so much fun to watch & you’re so 100% professional! 👍❤💋. You know just when to up the ante & stand your ground. Very well done, Sirs! 🤣💕🌹🍸🍸🍸
“I wonder if that is the judge?” Lmfao you guys killed this. Goddamn deputy over heated out there stating that you’re in no violation but that he is orally issuing court papers WOW
Mate : at 9:04 when Sergeant Armstrong offers to take you to talk to the Judge, Should have gone up, and asked, what Regulation, Rule, Code or Instrument are His/Her Honour using to overrule the Constitution in a Public Place? Call them out on their bluff, if threatened with contempt, an apology always resets any contempt threat, such like.... "your Honour, i apologize for anything i have said or done that may have offended this court as it was not my intention, now why did you just threaten me?" alway finish with a question, be the one "as king" them questions, not answering any.
Firstly, court orders are only to specific people. He can not serve you with a court order unless that court order is to you specifically. Secondly, CA's constitution only gives judges authority to preside over their courtroom, not the property
"There's a court order that prohibits people from video taping the court house." Then the officer states they are not violating anything, SO HE MAKES UP his own addition to the bogus court order with, "Could be if your filming outside and certain activities, certain areas"
The ruling only applies to the Courtroom, not the Courthouse. Which begs the question: why didn't you inform the officer that you also had the legal right to film in the publicly accessible areas of the Courthouse? Ultimately, allowing cameras in a Courtroom is left up the discretion of each presiding judge. I also pished my pants when you told him to shut up, and he responds by calling in a Code 1, asking the person if he heard you. LOL!
Johnny, you know I love you (not in a creepy, stalker way lol), but you were a little rough after he came back out. He was trying to tell you he checked and you all were right. I totally get that the adrenaline was pumping. I still love you, not going to unsubscribe or anything DUMB AF like that. All you people that think this shit is easy, or think you can do better, then take a tip from nike...Just do it. Sitting in your living room watching it on youtube is easy. Until you are face to face with one of these armed tyrants, you really have no clue what you would or would not do. I have recorded the police and thankfully, never have had a bad encounter. I live in a small coastal town in Oregon, and the cops here are pretty chill. So far. lol Not every auditor is the same, they all have different styles, all have different approaches. But what is the same is their mission. Their whole purpose. To educate. To stand up for OUR rights. Until you walk a mile in their shoes, stfu.
I lol'd a dozen times in the comments. Why's anyone surprised Johnny five o doesn't take directions well? I think his style is coming together nicely. Note: the sheriffs officer kinda had an eventual pass; he took a break, studied up and came back with a different attitude. I'd rate him "most improved student".
Van Nuys Courthouse in California. You are an absolute Legend. I L❤ve catching-up on all your Classics Baby Cakes‼️👍☺️⚘️🎂💯 This guy already had a Body Camera 📷
Every now and then some judges tries this nonsense, and they're always slapped down. Judges can't defy the Constitution. I'd love to be arrested by some clown with an illegal court order.
Love the direct approach. "Stop filming" No. "Move back!" No. "Bla, bla bla" Shut up. Wish more auditors would be this direct, and especially, when asked, for ID, what you are doing, etc.: "none of your business"
Wow. Wilford Brimley lives in his Own Private Idaho. He reminds me of Dumpty in that regard! And what's the deal with the opening and closing of his mouth, kinda like a goldfish. Maybe it's some sort of medical condition.
YOU HAVE GRACE ON YOUR SIDE U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171 (1983) .There was no doubt, according to the Court's majority, that the sidewalk around the Supreme Court building qualified as a traditional public forum. Grace, 461 U.S. at 179-80. The fact that this particular sidewalk surrounded a particular federal building did not give the government the right to strip away its traditional public forum character. Id. No fence, separation, or barrier indicated that this part of the sidewalk differed from any other part of this heavily traveled public walkway. Id. at 179. The government therefore lacked the right to ban speech in this public thoroughfare. Id. In perhaps the Court's strongest-ever affirmation of traditional public forum First Amendment safeguards
Johnny is an asshole and also has a piss poor understanding of the laws. Remember that time he mentioned the DHS memo to a private business? He's a pretender.
That deputy was a total douchebag, going inside to get an illegal court order. Good thing he read it before coming back out. Johnny said he could have used more colorful language, I wish he had. I cringe a little every time I think about my daughter living out there in that God forsaken shithole of a state.
The deputy was actually willing to come out and admit that he was mistaken about the court order applying to the outside of the building. Johnny 5-O would not shut up long enough to understand that the deputy was being contrite.
A little district court judge doesn't have the authority or power to over turn a Supreme Court ruling nor do they have the ability to legally strip away our constitutional rights. I've seen/heard of judges doing this many times, but yet haven't seen any order hold up. These judges are over reaching when they try and place court orders out like this.
Enjoy your work Nathanial. I like hearing what the officers have to say when they approach auditors. Whether it be their ignorance of the law or their ego/testosterone speaking. The entire audio of this interaction is this Johnny dude squawking. Nathanial, please take the lead on interactions when you're with him and encourage him to stop yapping so much. I could hear/sense some hesitation from you when he wouldn't stop talking and cutting the officer off. I'm sure he likes the sound of his voice and perhaps many viewers do too but I, for one, do not.
Wait a minute, first, I'm no legal expert, but from my understanding of law, in order for a Judge to issue a Court order there must be a Court "case". In a court case there has to be two opposing parties that present argument before a judge/jury. Then the Judge renders a "court order" in the case. In other words, each party must be given the opportunity to be heard, present evidence, call witnesses, etc. This was not a Court order, it was policy written by a judge......unenforceable outside the court building.
When Sheriffs Security Guard "Wilfred Brimley" lol came out and Nasty nathanial said "You are Sheriffs Security you have no authority out here Wilfred points to his L.A. Sheriffs patch! lol lol it reminds me of Captain Mauser in Police Academy 2 back in training lol when Mauser points to his Captain Bars in one of the scenes and says "Captain Mauser"!! lol. Great Audit NastyNathanial! you may have schooled L.A. Sheriffs Dept on this day.
He is not a “Private Security Officer” he is a Security Officer hired directly from the Sheriffs Department not contracted through a Private Company so big boy was correct on that one.
Harry O'Neil A Security Guard yes a “Private Security Guard” NO! The guy is an employee of the Sheriffs Department. Not taking sides at all just stating facts
court or·der kôrt ˈôrdər/ noun A court order is an official proclamation by a judge (or panel of judges) that defines the legal relationships between the parties to a hearing, a trial, an appeal or other court proceedings. Such ruling requires or authorizes the carrying out of certain steps by one or more parties to a case.
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171 (1983) As a general matter, expressive activities involving "speech" protected by the First Amendment in "Public places," such as streets, sidewalks, and parks, historically associated with the free exercise of expressive activities, are considered, without more, to be "public forums." Therefore the sidewalks forming the perimeter of the grounds of a federal building that are indistinguishable from any other sidewalk should not be treated any differently, and thus are public forums for First Amendment purposes. "The sidewalks comprising the outer boundaries of the (Supreme) Court grounds are indistinguishable from any other sidewalks in Washington, D.C., and we can discern no reason why they should be treated any differently," Justice White wrote in Grace. Id. at 179. The same principle applies to the segment of road at issue in this present controversy.
Jacksonville Judge Rescinds UNCONSTITUTIONAL ORDER TO NOT FILM A COURTHOUSE in Wake of PINAC Lawsuit The North Florida Chief Circuit Judge who issued an unconstitutional order barring citizens from video recording the outside of a Jacksonville courthouse, prompting national criticism along with a federal lawsuit from PINAC, has rescinded his order. Fourth Circuit Chief Judge Mark Mahon rescinded his order Wednesday, two days after a former Jacksonville judge from the same circuit agreed to join PINAC in its lawsuit, further embarrassing the rookie chief judge among his peers. In his latest order, Mahon explains that he issued the initial order banning photography and protests outside the courthouse in order to ensure “a fair trial” for defendants that he does not name. We know he never intended for PINAC correspondent Michale Hoffman to have a fair trial because he did everything in his power to ensure he did not receive a fair trial, including banning our videographers from recording the trial as well as banning Hoffman from using the First Amendment as his defense in what was obviously a First Amendment case. To be precise, it was Duval County Judge Brent Shore who prevented us from recording the trial as well as preventing Hoffman from using the First Amendment as his defense, but Mahon is the chief administer of the Duval, Clay and Nassau County courts, so he approved the decisions. And it was Mahon who issued the order banning videography and protests in front of the Duval County Courthouse, an act that was met with ridicule by national and local websites. Mahon’s decision means we will withdraw our lawsuit, a decision made by our attorney, Andrew Bonderud, who could have pushed for attorney fees, but decided against it. However, it does not address the fact that we were forbidden from recording Hoffman’s trial, even though the Florida Supreme Court established that right in 1979. That’s an issue that was not addressed in our lawsuit because it’s a separate issue from the judge’s unconstitutional order. That’s an issue that needs to be resolved and will be resolved. Hoffman ended up convicted, which was not surprising considering they did not allow him a proper defense; a conviction he is appealing with the help of Bonderud. Initially, Hoffman’s misdemeanor trespassing trial was of no interest to the local media, but they all became interested after Judge Mahon issued his initial order banning protests and videography in front of the courthouse. In fact, they all scooped us on this story, which is fine with us. We appreciate the coverage from the Florida Times-Union, First Coast News and News4Jax. The local media was even preparing its own legal battle against Mahon, knowing they would be next in line if he was allowed to continue violating PINAC’s First Amendment rights. The rescission comes after representatives from five media outlets, including WJCT and News4Jax, met with Judge Mahon on Tuesday to voice their concerns about the restrictions. First-Amendment Lawyer, George Gabel spearheaded the fight against the order. Gabel said, “It was an issue that brought together all the major news media on an issue that’s important to their ability to inform the public about courthouse proceedings even though they’re competitors in the news business.” We had planned a protest against the order for Monday, which will continue as scheduled, only now it will be more of a celebration, so everybody is welcome to join us. RSVP here. Earlier today, PINAC reporters Jeff Gray and Thomas Covenent aka Epic Old Guy returned to the same spot in front of the courthouse where they had been previously threatened with arrest for video recording. But this time, the cops greeted them with handshakes. photographyisnotacrime.com/2015/07/jacksonville-judge-rescinds-unconstitutional-order-in-wake-of-pinac-lawsuit/
+Finbar Hoffman was convicted of trespassing. He was on public property displaying signs in protest of the IRS and the police. Don't know what happened with the appeal.
Ignorance might be a small part of it but more so, in my opinion is their determination to “win” the encounter when challenged. It’s mostly just power tripping.
Faulkner County Circuit Court, 510 S German Ln, Conway, AR 72034 this court building doesn’t allow video or audio in or around there building they need to be audited!.
Thanks for the interesting fact of where the Menendez trial happened. I did not know, now I do. It may come in handy playing a game of trivial pursuit or what have you someday lol in which I will now be able to say I learned from Nasty Nate. Thanks bud
Locking those door has to be a major fire safety violation. He locked those door and had there been a fire there would have been people trampled and crushed to death. wow that is scary dangerous
Can you guys go to Santa Monica Courhouse? They sent the Sheriffs after me for filming outside. Can you also explain how you can defy the court order thing?
this is real tragedy here... nathanial you might be my top auditor from em all with your calm and respectful way to handle these audits ... yet you team up with someone the complete opposite of your style .. this does not match up at all, just read many of the other comments here .. johnny is way to unrespectful bei yelling, cutting people off and escalating stuff by his voice... you have some real high quality content on your channel - i would be worried seeing more of this "team" - sorry to be that honest (and for my english, not my native language :P)
The security guard was a little obtuse, but Johnny was a bit harsh on the cop. He was really passive, and wasn’t given a chance to speak. The best audits are when the auditor is passive and calm, meaning any aggression comes from the authority. As soon as you become the aggressor, you lose your moral high ground. You’re both good auditors though, but in my view: the style needs a bit of adjustment.
Zeus Boo look at NNH, Battousai, Honor Your Oath, and usually HDCW. Johnny is a new breed that enjoys unwarranted escalation, and while I support his right to free speech, I don't enjoy his *unwarranted* abuse. (When the cops earn the hate, it's great to watch him unload on them).
paul, i can't seem to find your audits,. um where are they? what's that? you've never done an audit?? Imagine my lack of shock!! do you tell other people how to do their jobs often, even when you can't do that job yourself? STFU!
ocsob007 your opinion certainly stinks. Opinions are neither right nor wrong, but to suggest someone isn't allowed an opinion on X because he never made X is stupid. This was placed out in public for public criticism, and the OP was exercising his right to free speech. Your opinion certainly does stink.
The problem is that these cops and security have no idea what engaging in lawful activity looks like. They put their costumes on every morning and think they can just tell people what to do if they don’t like it. Police in this country must be reformed and that starts with being educated. They must know where their lane is and stay in it.
You're dismissed never gets old. I laugh everytime
Whatever buildings are adjacent to the courthouse almost certainly have security cameras constantly videoing the courthouse.
Wow, when you told that guy to shut up you might just have been the first person to ever tell him that, he was truly butthurt.
I just found a Mr. Nast audit that I haven’t watched yet (I thought I had them all on my Mr. Nast binge)..Officer Friendly 😆😂🤣 You guys are so much fun to watch & you’re so 100% professional! 👍❤💋. You know just when to up the ante & stand your ground. Very well done, Sirs! 🤣💕🌹🍸🍸🍸
*a Mr. Nasty audit (I cannot edit my responses..)❤
"Well than shut up..." That is hilarious especially with his reaction looking so shocked...
Funny as hell, when you told that security guard to shut up, the look on his face was priceless, good job Nasty and Johnny
This was a particularly good one... thanks guys!
Thank you Nate for all u do my 3 year old daughter makes me play the siren and the patented ALRIGHT over and over again we love ur show!!!!!!!!!
“I wonder if that is the judge?” Lmfao you guys killed this. Goddamn deputy over heated out there stating that you’re in no violation but that he is orally issuing court papers WOW
if that judge made that order he belongs on the disbard list
How often you go back and check to see if they have been educated.
When the Wilfred Brimley name came up who else thought “Diabetus”…
Great video. The only thing missing Nasty Nathanial was your famous line, "where's Parker Osmon?"
Thetan Chaser "well alriiiiiiiiight"
Mate : at 9:04 when Sergeant Armstrong offers to take you to talk to the Judge, Should have gone up, and asked, what Regulation, Rule, Code or Instrument are His/Her Honour using to overrule the Constitution in a Public Place? Call them out on their bluff, if threatened with contempt, an apology always resets any contempt threat, such like....
"your Honour, i apologize for anything i have said or done that may have offended this court as it was not my intention, now why did you just threaten me?" alway finish with a question, be the one "as king" them questions, not answering any.
Firstly, court orders are only to specific people. He can not serve you with a court order unless that court order is to you specifically. Secondly, CA's constitution only gives judges authority to preside over their courtroom, not the property
Jerry.....Again thank you for educating people watching this video. Well Done
Jerry, Well said! Thanks.
He was going to show him the court order, not serve him one
"There's a court order that prohibits people from video taping the court house." Then the officer states they are not violating anything, SO HE MAKES UP his own addition to the bogus court order with, "Could be if your filming outside and certain activities, certain areas"
The ruling only applies to the Courtroom, not the Courthouse. Which begs the question: why didn't you inform the officer that you also had the legal right to film in the publicly accessible areas of the Courthouse? Ultimately, allowing cameras in a Courtroom is left up the discretion of each presiding judge. I also pished my pants when you told him to shut up, and he responds by calling in a Code 1, asking the person if he heard you. LOL!
i lol'd a dozen times and i knew what was coming next.
Johnny, you know I love you (not in a creepy, stalker way lol), but you were a little rough after he came back out. He was trying to tell you he checked and you all were right. I totally get that the adrenaline was pumping. I still love you, not going to unsubscribe or anything DUMB AF like that. All you people that think this shit is easy, or think you can do better, then take a tip from nike...Just do it. Sitting in your living room watching it on youtube is easy. Until you are face to face with one of these armed tyrants, you really have no clue what you would or would not do. I have recorded the police and thankfully, never have had a bad encounter. I live in a small coastal town in Oregon, and the cops here are pretty chill. So far. lol Not every auditor is the same, they all have different styles, all have different approaches. But what is the same is their mission. Their whole purpose. To educate. To stand up for OUR rights. Until you walk a mile in their shoes, stfu.
I lol'd a dozen times in the comments. Why's anyone surprised Johnny five o doesn't take directions well? I think his style is coming together nicely.
Note: the sheriffs officer kinda had an eventual pass; he took a break, studied up and came back with a different attitude. I'd rate him "most improved student".
I believe I heard 5-0 sing 'Steam' (The Band) lyrics.
another failed attempt to audit the employment office instead
johnny five o your turning into a snowflake 😂
8:09 holy shit.
Van Nuys Courthouse in California. You are an absolute Legend. I L❤ve catching-up on all your Classics Baby Cakes‼️👍☺️⚘️🎂💯 This guy already had a Body Camera 📷
Every now and then some judges tries this nonsense, and they're always slapped down. Judges can't defy the Constitution. I'd love to be arrested by some clown with an illegal court order.
Love the direct approach. "Stop filming" No. "Move back!" No. "Bla, bla bla" Shut up.
Wish more auditors would be this direct, and especially, when asked, for ID, what you are doing, etc.: "none of your business"
NastyNathanial: PASSED. Johnny five o: FAILED. (Sorry Johnny - too rough on the wrong guy.)
Wow. Wilford Brimley lives in his Own Private Idaho. He reminds me of Dumpty in that regard! And what's the deal with the opening and closing of his mouth, kinda like a goldfish. Maybe it's some sort of medical condition.
Schooled like always. The order is for INSIDE the courthouse not outside!!!
The reason they don’t want anyone filming toward the building is because of jurors. They want to protect their identity.
Mary Smith who would know they were jurors?
@@JASONCFFC They are the ones with the big ears.
Didn't this guy get assimilated in the movie, The Thing?
We don't live in a truly free country...
Take no prisoners guys. The look are there faces was priceless. Thanks for all you do.
YOU HAVE GRACE ON YOUR SIDE U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171 (1983) .There was no doubt, according to the Court's majority, that the sidewalk around the Supreme Court building qualified as a traditional public forum. Grace, 461 U.S. at 179-80. The fact that this particular sidewalk surrounded a particular federal building did not give the government the right to strip away its traditional public forum character. Id. No fence, separation, or barrier indicated that this part of the sidewalk differed from any other part of this heavily traveled public walkway. Id. at 179. The government therefore lacked the right to ban speech in this public thoroughfare. Id. In perhaps the Court's strongest-ever affirmation of traditional public forum First Amendment safeguards
Finbar Martin, Excellent reference info! Appreciated. Thanks
Good Video Nasty... (Side Note: Municipal rather than municiple) always love your vids!
Great educational video again. Keep up the great work.
Except for the part NN gets the law wrong.
they got OWNED 😂😂😂
Holy shit Johnny a little rough on this fella! He was more than respectful. Huh
Johnny is an asshole and also has a piss poor understanding of the laws. Remember that time he mentioned the DHS memo to a private business?
He's a pretender.
That deputy was a total douchebag, going inside to get an illegal court order. Good thing he read it before coming back out. Johnny said he could have used more colorful language, I wish he had. I cringe a little every time I think about my daughter living out there in that God forsaken shithole of a state.
The deputy was actually willing to come out and admit that he was mistaken about the court order applying to the outside of the building. Johnny 5-O would not shut up long enough to understand that the deputy was being contrite.
Yep, love it. Thanks guys.
Stand by him
No
Stand by him
No
Can someone post a link to the court order? I'd like to see what security was getting all worked up about.
Unconstitutional court order. Even inside it only applies to areas that are not accessible to public. Or a courtroom itself.
A little district court judge doesn't have the authority or power to over turn a Supreme Court ruling nor do they have the ability to legally strip away our constitutional rights. I've seen/heard of judges doing this many times, but yet haven't seen any order hold up. These judges are over reaching when they try and place court orders out like this.
Charles Blackstone My, you sure have a famous name.
Your post is spot on also.
Armstrong was quite decent actually.You guys should have been a little more civil with him
Holy cow! At 3:00, they wouldn't even let Elvis Presley in? That's just not right!
Loved it!! Wilfred was so shocked when NN told him to shut up. Priceless!!
Enjoy your work Nathanial. I like hearing what the officers have to say when they approach auditors. Whether it be their ignorance of the law or their ego/testosterone speaking. The entire audio of this interaction is this Johnny dude squawking. Nathanial, please take the lead on interactions when you're with him and encourage him to stop yapping so much. I could hear/sense some hesitation from you when he wouldn't stop talking and cutting the officer off. I'm sure he likes the sound of his voice and perhaps many viewers do too but I, for one, do not.
please sir dont get too close you might give me diabetus
Wait a minute, first, I'm no legal expert, but from my understanding of law, in order for a Judge to issue a Court order there must be a Court "case". In a court case there has to be two opposing parties that present argument before a judge/jury. Then the Judge renders a "court order" in the case. In other words, each party must be given the opportunity to be heard, present evidence, call witnesses, etc. This was not a Court order, it was policy written by a judge......unenforceable outside the court building.
Alllllllriiiiiiight!
When Sheriffs Security Guard "Wilfred Brimley" lol came out and Nasty nathanial said "You are Sheriffs Security you have no authority out here Wilfred points to his L.A. Sheriffs patch! lol lol it reminds me of Captain Mauser in Police Academy 2 back in training lol when Mauser points to his Captain Bars in one of the scenes and says "Captain Mauser"!! lol. Great Audit NastyNathanial! you may have schooled L.A. Sheriffs Dept on this day.
He is not a “Private Security Officer” he is a Security Officer hired directly from the Sheriffs Department not contracted through a Private Company so big boy was correct on that one.
Harry O'Neil A Security Guard yes a “Private Security Guard” NO! The guy is an employee of the Sheriffs Department. Not taking sides at all just stating facts
All citizens have arresting powers
Nathanial, great audit. As usual, no one can get any reasonable word in edgewise due to your auditing companion. But, you did a great job.
NATHANIAL, YOU AND jOHNNY 5 O MAKE A GREAT TEAM.......YOU HAD ME LAUGHING MY ASS OFF. gREAT JOB. HAPPY NEW YEAR
Question is how long has Armstrong worked there before he actually read the court order.
that was hilarious!!!! thanks so much for standing up for our rights as legal American citizens
Awesome job like always.
court or·der
kôrt ˈôrdər/
noun
A court order is an official proclamation by a judge (or panel of judges) that defines the legal relationships between the parties to a hearing, a trial, an appeal or other court proceedings. Such ruling requires or authorizes the carrying out of certain steps by one or more parties to a case.
The old deputy reminds me of the wino from Mayberry, 😂!
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171 (1983) As a general matter, expressive activities involving "speech" protected by the First Amendment in "Public places," such as streets, sidewalks, and parks, historically associated with the free exercise of expressive activities, are considered, without more, to be "public forums." Therefore the sidewalks forming the perimeter of the grounds of a federal building that are indistinguishable from any other sidewalk should not be treated any differently, and thus are public forums for First Amendment purposes. "The sidewalks comprising the outer boundaries of the (Supreme) Court grounds are indistinguishable from any other sidewalks in Washington, D.C., and we can discern no reason why they should be treated any differently," Justice White wrote in Grace. Id. at 179. The same principle applies to the segment of road at issue in this present controversy.
Finbar, Thank you... Always appreciate your referenced posts. A+
FLOWERGIRLDEB "Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world" Nelson Mandela
OMG you guys are the best! I love it when you tell them they are dismissed
You're video taping yourself is one of the best lines yet.
Wilford wasn't willing to listen to you! I crack me up! Haha
Jacksonville Judge Rescinds UNCONSTITUTIONAL ORDER TO NOT FILM A COURTHOUSE in Wake of PINAC Lawsuit The North Florida Chief Circuit Judge who issued an unconstitutional order barring citizens from video recording the outside of a Jacksonville courthouse, prompting national criticism along with a federal lawsuit from PINAC, has rescinded his order.
Fourth Circuit Chief Judge Mark Mahon rescinded his order Wednesday, two days after a former Jacksonville judge from the same circuit agreed to join PINAC in its lawsuit, further embarrassing the rookie chief judge among his peers.
In his latest order, Mahon explains that he issued the initial order banning photography and protests outside the courthouse in order to ensure “a fair trial” for defendants that he does not name.
We know he never intended for PINAC correspondent Michale Hoffman to have a fair trial because he did everything in his power to ensure he did not receive a fair trial, including banning our videographers from recording the trial as well as banning Hoffman from using the First Amendment as his defense in what was obviously a First Amendment case.
To be precise, it was Duval County Judge Brent Shore who prevented us from recording the trial as well as preventing Hoffman from using the First Amendment as his defense, but Mahon is the chief administer of the Duval, Clay and Nassau County courts, so he approved the decisions.
And it was Mahon who issued the order banning videography and protests in front of the Duval County Courthouse, an act that was met with ridicule by national and local websites.
Mahon’s decision means we will withdraw our lawsuit, a decision made by our attorney, Andrew Bonderud, who could have pushed for attorney fees, but decided against it.
However, it does not address the fact that we were forbidden from recording Hoffman’s trial, even though the Florida Supreme Court established that right in 1979.
That’s an issue that was not addressed in our lawsuit because it’s a separate issue from the judge’s unconstitutional order.
That’s an issue that needs to be resolved and will be resolved.
Hoffman ended up convicted, which was not surprising considering they did not allow him a proper defense; a conviction he is appealing with the help of Bonderud.
Initially, Hoffman’s misdemeanor trespassing trial was of no interest to the local media, but they all became interested after Judge Mahon issued his initial order banning protests and videography in front of the courthouse.
In fact, they all scooped us on this story, which is fine with us. We appreciate the coverage from the Florida Times-Union, First Coast News and News4Jax.
The local media was even preparing its own legal battle against Mahon, knowing they would be next in line if he was allowed to continue violating PINAC’s First Amendment rights.
The rescission comes after representatives from five media outlets, including WJCT and News4Jax, met with Judge Mahon on Tuesday to voice their concerns about the restrictions.
First-Amendment Lawyer, George Gabel spearheaded the fight against the order.
Gabel said, “It was an issue that brought together all the major news media on an issue that’s important to their ability to inform the public about courthouse proceedings even though they’re competitors in the news business.”
We had planned a protest against the order for Monday, which will continue as scheduled, only now it will be more of a celebration, so everybody is welcome to join us. RSVP here.
Earlier today, PINAC reporters Jeff Gray and Thomas Covenent aka Epic Old Guy returned to the same spot in front of the courthouse where they had been previously threatened with arrest for video recording.
But this time, the cops greeted them with handshakes.
photographyisnotacrime.com/2015/07/jacksonville-judge-rescinds-unconstitutional-order-in-wake-of-pinac-lawsuit/
+Finbar Hoffman was convicted of trespassing. He was on public property displaying signs in protest of the IRS and the police. Don't know what happened with the appeal.
LOL Oh My Zod!!! I just looked up images of Wilford Brimley. Baaahahaha
A person should be able to record inside the court room too...
That's was a good one.I really enjoy your videos. You don't hold back on that crap of law enforcement
3:00 Elvis sighting
lol i seen him
+Kirk Gibbs
He was ordered to *_appear_* in court.
:
LOL!!!! You guys are too much!
ALRIGHT!!❤️
Words out AUDITOR NATION ON THE MOVE !
"Auditor Nation'.. Love it!!!
“Is that a verbal threat?”
Oh, no sir I wasn’t talking to you, remember?
I would like to see a copy of this court order
Ignorance is the worst disease in the world.
Ignorance might be a small part of it but more so, in my opinion is their determination to “win” the encounter when challenged. It’s mostly just power tripping.
Faulkner County Circuit Court, 510 S German Ln, Conway, AR 72034 this court building doesn’t allow video or audio in or around there building they need to be audited!.
Thanks for the interesting fact of where the Menendez trial happened. I did not know, now I do. It may come in handy playing a game of trivial pursuit or what have you someday lol in which I will now be able to say I learned from Nasty Nate. Thanks bud
Lol like you can see anything through the doors and people etc etc
I live in Australia and just love watching all these audits!
Great video man. I can't lie, my favorite part is the thumbnail. That guy looked at you like you just ate the last Pringle...
Locking those door has to be a major fire safety violation. He locked those door and had there been a fire there would have been people trampled and crushed to death. wow that is scary dangerous
8:08 I can't stop laughing. Brilliant editing. Funny as FUCK. David can't help his ignorance. Hahahaha
The sergeant was fine. He was treated pretty harshly when he actually did really well.
News Now Kansas City fine?? He threatened court order and arrest for filming...FILMING! Anyone against our Rights is a Tyrant.
Good video
Sooooooo...... What was the verbiage on that paper work...???
That I can't film in the courtroom...???
Can you guys go to Santa Monica Courhouse? They sent the Sheriffs after me for filming outside. Can you also explain how you can defy the court order thing?
Johnny was acting alittle irate honestly. I like him but that was a little much.
And the reason why the DA's office didn't send anyone outside to address this is?
OMG I wish I had half the balls you two have!! THAT WAS GREAT!
this is real tragedy here... nathanial you might be my top auditor from em all with your calm and respectful way to handle these audits ... yet you team up with someone the complete opposite of your style .. this does not match up at all, just read many of the other comments here .. johnny is way to unrespectful bei yelling, cutting people off and escalating stuff by his voice...
you have some real high quality content on your channel - i would be worried seeing more of this "team" - sorry to be that honest (and for my english, not my native language :P)
Has anyone figured out if the man at the end was the judge or who he was?
Judge Greg Mathis came out and saved his 20 years past retirement ass.
NN, I love your videos. Next time, leave the douchebag at home. He’s making you look bad.
good stuff gentlemen! thank you
Why didn't you guys take a tour inside it???
When the cop said "There's a court order issued by the judge." I about lost it. You should have come back with, "The judge isn't above the law."
Omgoodness. What corrupt officials trying to pass off one rule to serve as a blanket ordinance. Unbelievable.
So now county judges have the authority to over-ride state and federal law?!?!?!?
The security guard was a little obtuse, but Johnny was a bit harsh on the cop. He was really passive, and wasn’t given a chance to speak. The best audits are when the auditor is passive and calm, meaning any aggression comes from the authority. As soon as you become the aggressor, you lose your moral high ground. You’re both good auditors though, but in my view: the style needs a bit of adjustment.
Zeus Boo look at NNH, Battousai, Honor Your Oath, and usually HDCW. Johnny is a new breed that enjoys unwarranted escalation, and while I support his right to free speech, I don't enjoy his *unwarranted* abuse. (When the cops earn the hate, it's great to watch him unload on them).
Agree whole heartedly with Paul.
paul, i can't seem to find your audits,. um where are they? what's that? you've never done an audit?? Imagine my lack of shock!! do you tell other people how to do their jobs often, even when you can't do that job yourself? STFU!
ocsob007 because you can't have an opinion about things unless you do them? That's retarded.
ocsob007 your opinion certainly stinks. Opinions are neither right nor wrong, but to suggest someone isn't allowed an opinion on X because he never made X is stupid. This was placed out in public for public criticism, and the OP was exercising his right to free speech. Your opinion certainly does stink.
A 20 year felony for smoking 20 feet from a building. WTF has happened to America!
Starring Wilford Brimley as the security guard, funny !
Haha. He kept trying to talk and J5O kept chiming in and interrupting him..
The older Sheriff security guard seems to have an onset of dementia... 🤣
*SGT. ARMSTRONG?!!! THAT SOUNDS OFFICIAL!!!*
So now we're paying for the county sheriff to scan in front of the Scientology building all day or is that the Scientology building