All was fun, until the evolution question. I was hoping the video would have provided the suggested answer, instead of leaving it hanging, which may result in the audience gaining incorrect knowledge or misconceptions of Evolution. The 20s explanation of evolution is: In a population (one [species] living in the same geographical location) there exist [variations] due to random mutations, individuals with favorable variation(traits) are selected for and have a higher chance to survive and reproduce. Their offspring [inherit] these favourable traits, overtime, proportion of individuals with such favorable traits increases and the population is said to be [adapted] to the environment. Just want to point out that the picture used for evolution, the march of progress, portrays one of the worst misconception for Evolution. Evolution is not a linear process whereby a Monkey 'evolves' into humans. This leads to many people asking the question: "If evolution is true, why are there still monkeys"? The process of Evolution is a branching process rather than a linear process. Humans and monkeys shared a common ancestor, which lived ~8-6 million years ago. This common ancestor split in their population where one group went on to give rise to the monkeys we have today while another group gave rise to us. We are cousins to monkeys, we did not evolved from monkeys. If you wanted a less than 5 seconds description of Evolution, it would be: "Descent with Modification". Hope this post help clarify some doubts for someone. If interested, below are some useful resources on Evolution: - evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/home.php - Short guide on Evolution by 'It's ok to be smart': ua-cam.com/video/c_jyHp3bmEw/v-deo.html
@@hcFDX There are no 'multiple' theories (the prior mention Lamarck's theory was a competing idea, but soon to be shown false) but there are different ways in which Evolution can occur. The most common example used is natural selection, where nature does the 'selecting' - e.g. birds eating poorly camouflaged moths --> overtime, majority of the remaining moths in the population are the ones that are well camouflaged. Another way is through artificial selection, where humans are the one 'selecting' - e.g. domestication of wolves: Our early ancestors hunted together with gray wolves. Our ancestors saw that there was variation in the tameness of the wolves and decided that they preferred wolves which are more obedient to them. So they selected for breeding pairs that are more obedient and overtime, the wolf population that stayed with humans are a lot more 'tamed' as compared to their wild counterparts. And you can guess, after a long period of time (20 000 - 40 000 years), this population of gray wolves that humans domesticated evolved into dogs we know nowadays. If you are interested here is a similar example but of domesticated foxes: ua-cam.com/video/4dwjS_eI-lQ/v-deo.html&ab_channel=VergeScience The beauty in science is that theory are always waiting to be challenged and shown to be falsed. A good theory is one in which it is very easy to show it is wrong but has stood the test of time, whereby no evidence has been surfaced so far to disprove it
i understand that tsl wants to give everyone a chance. but if this many people hates and disapproves of megan for what she has done and her invalid points (as seen on this vid and crash course vid), shouldn't such a figure be better off-screen? it's normal for one to garner hate, but if theres so many haters and it is caused by her actions, both past and present (in vids), wouldn't it be better to not cast her in videos since she is too unlikeable?
Agree. But I think they already filmed all of these videos before her saga which caused people to hate and disapprove of her, so I don’t think TSL will want to re-flim (so much cost & time, editing factors to consider). Presently it clearly shows in the videos that she appears in, her invalid points in the various videos are quite turn off too lol. Personally for me I’d just skip her parts that she’s appearing in. Loooool 😐
@@sherlim6694 hahaha, i don't think so anymore! bc shes been appearing in more and more videos recently and idt all of them were filmed before her saga and hate
Megan is pretty, rather cute at times but unfortunately too controversial as a person. If without the TikTok saga, she’d have gone far. But right now she’s just having a really pretentious image, being all innocent when everyone knows that she tried to “cancel” content creators.
how is she pretending to be innocent? you expect her to go, "oh i tried cancelling content creators" on every video she appears in? anyway i don't even agree with her views but there's no need for you to try "cancelling" her too. i'd rather have people like her who have their own mind & their own thinking (even if i don't agree with them) than another vanilla cookie-cutter personality who doesn't have their own mind, or rather has their own mind but is scared to speak up due to fear of being unliked. singapore is full of influencers like these already.
@@LittleStrawbirdy her pretending to be “innocent” is more about her personality/character that she’s trying to portray. I’m quite certain I’m not the only one feeling this way based on the comments that I’ve been seeing. I don’t think my one comment can actually “cancel” her…… it’s just an opinion that I have lmao I didn’t expect so many people to “like” this comment either. You’re entitled to your own opinions about her not being a vanilla cooker cutter influencer but I think I’m entitled to mine too LOL. I didn’t disregard the fact that she’s pretty and quite cute ah but IN MY OPINION (anyone can disagree or agree but I’m not cancelling her looooool) just quite wasted that she decided to “talk about her views” which are very controversial. I agree with you that having own mind & views are good, but at the expense of others while being insensitive and trying to “cancel” other people makes her a very questionable person…
@@rafiq6521 I’ve been trying to reply you but my comment keeps getting deleted loooool idk why :’) The moment I try to explain more or give suggestions on where to know more about this if you don’t have Tiktok, my comment gets deleted
the evolution answer from the students was completely wrong lol. Gain/loss in function is to explain increased risk of cancer. Loss in function does not necessarily mean lower survivability
guys... legit give megan a break lol. yes she behaved in a way in the previous video that deserved some banter/shittalking, but she seriously didnt do anything in this video unless youre just a hypersensitive negative energy person also loving the PSB academy team's super cold humour wtf theyre legit so unwittingly funny sial!!! but im a "the office" over "friends" kind of person so idk
No lah, its in her personal tiktok and socials that she tried calling out content creators for things that they didn't do or say and implied that they are sexist, trying to cancel them. Thats why she got so many backlashes, not on tsl videos. If she truly learnt and changed her ways, i think people should welcome it and embrace that people make mistakes, but in her ig vid, she doubled up on her claims sia.
@@yapolloable in the Crash Course episode, people were attacking her for acting bitchy when it's all to live up the mood. They're just finding any way to attack her 😂
All was fun, until the evolution question. I was hoping the video would have provided the suggested answer, instead of leaving it hanging, which may result in the audience gaining incorrect knowledge or misconceptions of Evolution.
The 20s explanation of evolution is:
In a population (one [species] living in the same geographical location) there exist [variations] due to random mutations, individuals with favorable variation(traits) are selected for and have a higher chance to survive and reproduce. Their offspring [inherit] these favourable traits, overtime, proportion of individuals with such favorable traits increases and the population is said to be [adapted] to the environment.
Just want to point out that the picture used for evolution, the march of progress, portrays one of the worst misconception for Evolution. Evolution is not a linear process whereby a Monkey 'evolves' into humans. This leads to many people asking the question: "If evolution is true, why are there still monkeys"?
The process of Evolution is a branching process rather than a linear process. Humans and monkeys shared a common ancestor, which lived ~8-6 million years ago. This common ancestor split in their population where one group went on to give rise to the monkeys we have today while another group gave rise to us.
We are cousins to monkeys, we did not evolved from monkeys.
If you wanted a less than 5 seconds description of Evolution, it would be: "Descent with Modification".
Hope this post help clarify some doubts for someone. If interested, below are some useful resources on Evolution:
- evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/home.php
- Short guide on Evolution by 'It's ok to be smart': ua-cam.com/video/c_jyHp3bmEw/v-deo.html
Thanks for the explanation! We’ll pin it so everyone else can see :)
Aren't there multiple theories to the process of evolution?
@@yzjr3425 lol did you take the nus mod darwin evolution mod?
@@animemachinex3 John Van Whye!
@@hcFDX There are no 'multiple' theories (the prior mention Lamarck's theory was a competing idea, but soon to be shown false) but there are different ways in which Evolution can occur.
The most common example used is natural selection, where nature does the 'selecting' - e.g. birds eating poorly camouflaged moths --> overtime, majority of the remaining moths in the population are the ones that are well camouflaged.
Another way is through artificial selection, where humans are the one 'selecting' - e.g. domestication of wolves: Our early ancestors hunted together with gray wolves. Our ancestors saw that there was variation in the tameness of the wolves and decided that they preferred wolves which are more obedient to them. So they selected for breeding pairs that are more obedient and overtime, the wolf population that stayed with humans are a lot more 'tamed' as compared to their wild counterparts. And you can guess, after a long period of time (20 000 - 40 000 years), this population of gray wolves that humans domesticated evolved into dogs we know nowadays.
If you are interested here is a similar example but of domesticated foxes: ua-cam.com/video/4dwjS_eI-lQ/v-deo.html&ab_channel=VergeScience
The beauty in science is that theory are always waiting to be challenged and shown to be falsed.
A good theory is one in which it is very easy to show it is wrong but has stood the test of time, whereby no evidence has been surfaced so far to disprove it
Hafeez is a joy to have in a group. He's like Kwang Soo in Running Man, but less silly. God bless you, brother.
Yeah to this - he's like the underrated comic relief who's a really good teammate
I think bolin's kwangsoo. I think he'd be more of a Haha
will let him know about your comment. Cheers :)
@1:56 l0bster hence 10 legs HAHA gotta give it to Hafeez for his ingenuity 🤣
why the middle guy sleep deprived act smart but he like dk most of the tings
The middle dude/Gal from sleep deprived is kinda annoying.. The know it all in the team but didn't actually contribute any points.
Tsl discuss and penalised but the other team keep discussing 😂 lol
that last question,,,,,,,, how tf was demim’s answer acceptable 😅
agree, the team denim's answer for the last question is totally wrong
@@yingjie652 *confused primary school student*
Cause maybe they answer within the time stated but I agree with you.
Cause maybe they answered the question within the time taken but I agree with you.
"10bster". Thanks Hafeez!
whys the bowl haircut guy so sassy
how did brenda cheat tho lol. the other team also had their team mates helping??? bruh lol
Hafeez: 'so its either A, B, C or D lah' 🙋🙋🙋🙋🙋
Are the uni students ok? Lol
Give the editor a raise
The middle guy from the PSB team looks like the MP Indranee Rajah sia...
i understand that tsl wants to give everyone a chance. but if this many people hates and disapproves of megan for what she has done and her invalid points (as seen on this vid and crash course vid), shouldn't such a figure be better off-screen? it's normal for one to garner hate, but if theres so many haters and it is caused by her actions, both past and present (in vids), wouldn't it be better to not cast her in videos since she is too unlikeable?
Agree. But I think they already filmed all of these videos before her saga which caused people to hate and disapprove of her, so I don’t think TSL will want to re-flim (so much cost & time, editing factors to consider).
Presently it clearly shows in the videos that she appears in, her invalid points in the various videos are quite turn off too lol. Personally for me I’d just skip her parts that she’s appearing in. Loooool 😐
@@sherlim6694 hahaha, i don't think so anymore! bc shes been appearing in more and more videos recently and idt all of them were filmed before her saga and hate
@@hepburnsss2776 rabak………..I guess TSL is a company that “embraces” everyone. Even when megan is so unlikeable due to her saga 😂 *confuse*
what happened with Megan???
@@serene9532 try googling, you’ll see how she tries to cancel content creators by coming with imaginary claims of her own
Megan is pretty, rather cute at times but unfortunately too controversial as a person. If without the TikTok saga, she’d have gone far. But right now she’s just having a really pretentious image, being all innocent when everyone knows that she tried to “cancel” content creators.
can elaborate more? im just curious but i dont have tiktok to keep up LOL
how is she pretending to be innocent? you expect her to go, "oh i tried cancelling content creators" on every video she appears in? anyway i don't even agree with her views but there's no need for you to try "cancelling" her too. i'd rather have people like her who have their own mind & their own thinking (even if i don't agree with them) than another vanilla cookie-cutter personality who doesn't have their own mind, or rather has their own mind but is scared to speak up due to fear of being unliked. singapore is full of influencers like these already.
@@LittleStrawbirdy her pretending to be “innocent” is more about her personality/character that she’s trying to portray. I’m quite certain I’m not the only one feeling this way based on the comments that I’ve been seeing. I don’t think my one comment can actually “cancel” her…… it’s just an opinion that I have lmao I didn’t expect so many people to “like” this comment either.
You’re entitled to your own opinions about her not being a vanilla cooker cutter influencer but I think I’m entitled to mine too LOL. I didn’t disregard the fact that she’s pretty and quite cute ah but IN MY OPINION (anyone can disagree or agree but I’m not cancelling her looooool) just quite wasted that she decided to “talk about her views” which are very controversial.
I agree with you that having own mind & views are good, but at the expense of others while being insensitive and trying to “cancel” other people makes her a very questionable person…
@@rafiq6521 I’ve been trying to reply you but my comment keeps getting deleted loooool idk why :’) The moment I try to explain more or give suggestions on where to know more about this if you don’t have Tiktok, my comment gets deleted
@@sherlim6694 awww man :( that is annoying....
I love Zhin's top. That color is really nice.
marketing guy should spend more time studying business mods!
sleep deprive is me even just in 1st sem in uni 🤭
Ok I laughed at the ear joke. Lol.
They should have already known the answer before they answer since it is general knowledge.
3:13 easy comeback
3:44 OMG HAHAH, IM STUDYING FOR IT RN- AT THIS MOMENT
and GG am dying from words
the evolution answer from the students was completely wrong lol. Gain/loss in function is to explain increased risk of cancer. Loss in function does not necessarily mean lower survivability
They were illustrating what sounds more like mutation.
@@sunlightdavid Guy was talking abt inducing mutations for evolution, a natural process
@@yzjr3425 if you're inducing it... it ain't natural? Sorry I returned all my A levels Bio to the tutor lol
@@sunlightdavid The ones they were referring to were random mutations, so they were natural, not the ones caused by like radiation or chemicals etc.
Yay hafeez haha raffles represent!
It was interesting
last qn...???
Watch your other videos where?
This is like the National Science Challenge, on ez mode and with noobs.
TF THE OTHER GROUP WAS CHEATING ALSO WHY ONLY PENALISE TSL? bruh also the mushroom hair guy looks so scary and judgemental
Wow! Denim cracked me up
See lots of new faces, TSL is gonna have lots of hidden potential uncover soon, stay tune
Bruh dude have two digestive enzymes when only one was required. He should not have gotten the point lmfao
For the last answer team sleep deprived should have shortened their answer.
Mangkuk 😂😂😂 hafeeez plz
guys... legit give megan a break lol. yes she behaved in a way in the previous video that deserved some banter/shittalking, but she seriously didnt do anything in this video unless youre just a hypersensitive negative energy person
also loving the PSB academy team's super cold humour wtf theyre legit so unwittingly funny sial!!! but im a "the office" over "friends" kind of person so idk
No lah, its in her personal tiktok and socials that she tried calling out content creators for things that they didn't do or say and implied that they are sexist, trying to cancel them. Thats why she got so many backlashes, not on tsl videos. If she truly learnt and changed her ways, i think people should welcome it and embrace that people make mistakes, but in her ig vid, she doubled up on her claims sia.
@@yapolloable in the Crash Course episode, people were attacking her for acting bitchy when it's all to live up the mood. They're just finding any way to attack her 😂
@@corl2795 that's their problem. But this Megan is wrong to try a cancel others for things she imagined.
great video
mantap ....lol
I'm in QO watching this
Megan's laughter is so cute and contagious!!
haha brenda so cute!
since when did TSL have brains......
They do lol as proven in many videos
Megan rapping her last answer haha so cute
Disappointed as usual... PSB...
Mangkuk lol
10:03 hafeez is so damn fine WEEHHHHH
next of multiple of 6 after 96 is 84
Huh Megan again ah
bro relax lol
why r u so mean
Why so many megan haters
@@Jadonjadon322 insecurities perhaps
what....
Hii
Walao, Megan AGAIN?! 🤨 NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
lol relax
why r u so mean
What she do
You again? Please leave
megan go!!! we support you!
Also nice that Megan found time away from being a social justice warrior to come act in this. Unfortunately she's still annoying.
i dislike codfishes now... this comment did not pass the vibe/ humane check.
@@vontayyuman4478 aiyo, don't be so bad to the innocent fishes man
Relax lol 😂
kena this megan again
Lol relax 😂 love her energy!!
where is the respect please lor john doe
Go meggy!!!!👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼♥️♥️♥️♥️
Megan is so show off 😒
tina pisai relax lol
Don judge someone when u have never met them before.
@@SuryaSurya-rf9dk you meant “don’t”?
how? girlie was minding her own business. just say you hate smart people and go.
Girl you are so mean eh. At least she is pretty and smart
second
Megan is so pretty
the ratio question we dont call it "4 is to 5" , we call it "4to 5" now
Wait what? 4 to 5 is 4-5, 4 is to 5 is 4:5
@@yekai7599 I'm trying to say how to pronounce it
@@heyitsmetina1521 yes, it is still 4 is to 5, no such thing as 4 to 5
ok how old r u