The True Hidden INFILTRATION of Vatican II that No One talks about...
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 жов 2024
- QUEEN OF VICTORY ROSARIES: www.etsy.com/s...
USE COUPON CODE 'KENNEDY'
MEN'S CONFERENCE: canadianmartyr...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @meretradition
SIGN UP FOR MY SUBSTACK: meretradition....
SSPX BOOK: www.amazon.com...
TKR STORE PRODUCT PAGE: thekennedyrepo...
EMAIL LIST: thekennedyrepo...
DONATE HERE thekennedyrepo....
PATREON: / thekennedyreport
BOOK - Terror of Demons: www.amazon.com...
BOOK - Lockdown with the Devil: www.amazon.com...
Thank you for all your support! If you’re feeling generous in a Christmas spirit sort of way, there is a ‘thanks’ button if you’d like to use it 😅
Thanks Kennedy for explaining all of this to your generation. The books concerning your position about all of this was written decades ago and the eschatalogical realities is well understood.
Two books for Catholics to read to understand what happened behind the scenes during Vatican II: (1) The Plot Against the Church by Pinay (1962) written by Vatican insiders -- good expose on the communists and other diabolical agents working through the auspices of Vatican II (free online pdf and in audio form); and, (2) David Wemhoff's recent two volume work entitled "John Courtney Murray, Time/Life, & The American Proposition: How the CIA's Doctrinal Warfare Program Changed the Catholic Church". Wemhoff is a lawyer and did extensive research and sourcing of his material.
“Vatican II was never implemented correctly” 🤝 “Communism was never implemented correctly”
You beat me to it!
Haha! Exactly!
It's the same types of people trying to sell both.
Redundant, for sure. 😂
Communism is a gnostic religion masquerading as a socio-political and economic system. I works perfectly if you understand what it truly is about.
So many Catholics lost since Vll
Thanks for this. I met the great Archbishop LeFebvre two different times, in Seattle, and in Nanaimo, British Columbia. A truly amazing man! I have a couple of cherished photos of him. I have long been convinced of his mission and I appreciate your fervent determination to prove these points. It must be continued, if only that we can show Our Lord what we did with the talents He gave us. Prayers for you and for Taylor Marshall and all working for this cause. It will prove definitive.
Just curious..were you living g on Vancouver Island after the Council? . This may sound a bit nuts but it seemed as though an evil spirit was waiting for an excuse to appear and Vatican 2 was that excuse.
i think they did a darn good job of implementing what it is they wanted. I mean within several years, altar rails, altars were removed, no more facing ad orientum, eucharist on the hand, new missal etc...they may have suceeded if it wasn't for Archbishop Levebre and to some extent Pope Benedict XVI.
Don't forget about Bp. Carmona holding out in Mexico with the Cristero priests who formed the SST.
I learned a lot from Father Villa's work! I was baptized May of 1958. A month and a half after birth. You're 100% correct a major disaster. And getting worse like a festering boil. this vatican 2 modernism! God bless Sir!
I love reading Fr.Luigi Villa's magazine. He tells it like it is.
Kennedy, God bless you for always calling a thing what it is. Your clear, direct presentations tear off the masks that have been slid over the face of reality and plain, common sense. It's a breath of fresh air!
Read Infiltration a lot of people think that Taylor is crazy...i dont.
Neither do I - how can his ideas be ‘crazy’ when he references sources for his facts? ‘Crazy’ would be somebody just making stuff up!!!
Anyone who has been well read and versed in what has transpired in the Church over the last century or so, should not be fazed, nor astonished by Taylor's: Infiltration. To seasoned observers of the Church and the affairs of the Vatican, Infiltration can come off as rather resteained, tamped down and sedate. If Machiavelli were alive today, and got a taste of the Vatican today, he'd relegate his Prince as a primer for chiildren.
I think Taylor Marshall is very sound and grounded!
I like his style.
I recently discovered a man named Sam Shamoun who has his own style that's a little more aggressive but he's definitely being led by the Holy Spirit and the Blessed Virgin Mary. He's not officially Catholic yet but will most likely be in the near future.
He has a photographic memory of the Bible and has a knack for pointing out the errors of islam and protestantism.
@@capecodder04Sam Shamoun announced he is a Catholic on one of his livestreams. Just has to be initiated in the Church
I'm glad Shamoun wants to become Catholic after all. Fradd and Lofton didn't make it easy for him. He saw right through those dishonest men and didn't want to convert right away. I've followed Shamoun's counter-Islam teachings and apologetics since before I became Catholic. I hope he doesn't join the Vatican II Church, though. He would have to sacrifice his principles on the nature of God and the Tawhid vs. Trinity thanks to the blasphemy of Nostra Aetate 3, Lumen Gentium 16 and CCC 841.
Im with you Kennedy and Marshall, and Lefebvre, and etc.etc.etc. ❤
Thank you for this very clear and cogent analysis. Much appreciated. I was born and grew up into my teens before VII. I very much enjoy The Kennedy Report and am grateful for your apostolate. Fr. Chiantella (Raleigh, NC).
Praying for you all in NC!
"Neither hot nor cold I will vomit you out of my mouth" (Jesus)
The Bishops who initially implemented VII are the same ones who approved the VII documents. We know VII was implemented because a lot of changes took place after VII. Pro VII fans say that the VII docs were misinterpreted and thus misimplemented. Huh? So, are they saying that the same Bishops who wrote and approved the VII docs misinterpreted and misimplemented them? Hmm...
Rubbish. The documents themselves, were the equivalent of the pick axe, jack hammer, demolition ball and bulldozer. They are still.employed as such in our present day. Hello Traditiones Custodis
"Traditiones Custodes. Guardians of tradition. How ironic!@@LUIS-ox1bv
@@johnbradbury4000 Indeed, and the ironic twist was not lost on Pachapappa Francis.
All the original 'schemas' were thrown out by progressive Cardinals and rewritten to match their plans.
Yeah, and then people have to claim that Montini, Wojtyla and Ratzinger didn't interpret it properly in developing their teachings in their subsequent Magisterium after Vatican II.
Kennedy Hall always has good points.keep up the good work,and keep speaking truth Mr.Hall.God bless
Born in 1955...it started when I was a teenager - the
Church falling apart bit by bit, more and more, day by day - and all the time increased blathering about how Vatican 2 is going to save us.
“If they say such things while the wood is green what will they say when it’s dry?”
I recommend that you Read the book AA (Anti-Apostle) 1025 Revealed by Marie Carrè from Tan Books. It is the memoirs of a man named Michael who was raised Catholic, but at the age of 16 became a member of the KGB of the former USSR. He was told to infiltrate the Church in the United States and eventually became a priest. It is a real eye opener. Ave Maria!
Fascinating. I just read some reviews of this book and it would be a great follow-up to Bella Dodd's recount. Thanks for the suggestion. Maybe Kennedy can do a quick read and a video/review on it.
@@sleepinglioness5754what is the name of the Bella Dodd book 📕 with thanks 🙂
Remember reading that book years back.
One of many books I read when I came back to the church. Kennedy Hall is right, Taylor Marshall's "Infiltration" is a great summary of this history, and of the many books on this topic, including AA-1025
Well there is certainly truth to the idea that the Vatican Council was not implemented correctly and that is because Paul VI had a much more radical vision for the Church than many of the Church fathers did.
Thanks for bringing Queen of Victory Rosaries to my attention. She helped me with a rosary (based off of one she designed for you) as a gift for my parish priest. I would have never heard of her without your podcast. Also, thanks for all that you do. I value your comments and opinions on Church teachings. May God bless and protect you and your family.
You analysis is spot on, Kennedy. If V II is so great, the Holy Spirit would have blessed its efforts abundantly and a "hard sell" would be unnecessary. Yet, we still get the hard sell, even to the use of tyrannical coercion by the current regime. "The beatings will continue until morale imoroves!" 😢
Or they take a step further and say that it takes a hundred years for a council's teachings to be properly implemented. Its like trying to convince one that Operation warp speed is for the commom good, no matter how many drop like flies years later
@@LUIS-ox1bv .... there'll be few Catholics left in 100 years.
@@dorothylane2569 "A remnant left, sustained in grace?"
@@markthomas6436 The Church will survive - we've been promised that.
What is a remnant? Think of a carpet remnant - a small piece of a much larger whole.
Paul VI definitely lived to regret those words...Once he realized the council allowed for the "smoke of satan" to come into the Church.
Wasn’t Paul VI (‘66) head of butchering Traditional (2 Thes 2: 15) Mass
Keep educating us on v2.
I really like listening to you Kennedy, the podcast is great.
I have heard that the councils original documents were thrown out
I realize nothing unclean can enter heaven, but, I cant believe how fast JPll was canonized.
Did you know that he taught over and over that every man was god? He taught it from day one of his anti-Pontificate in Redemptor Hominis.
He praised all the false religions of the world till his death with no signs of repentance. He made many former Catholics become apostates by his acceptance of idolatry. He kissed the Koran. He received a blessing from a Hindu "priest", ect..
There is no way he is a Saint. He was an antipope. I recommend watching the video "The Antichrist's Distinguishing Mark".
I guess he could clean the Hindu cow dung anointing off his head and clean the drippings of Fijian ritual potions off his robes faster than we thought.
No way he’s in Heaven already (if on the way)
Freemason who approved Satan’s divine mercy devotion (Mt 6: 7; 24: 24)
100% on the money yet again. Always delivering rational, logical conclusions with a gravitas that other Catholic pundits could never even come close to. When you started with the 'it's never been implemented properly' immediately I thought of the same old argument by communists as well. It's no wonder we have so many communists in the Church.
Q. Were the Bishops who were not implementing V2 correctly as alleged disciplined in any matter for not implementing V2 reforms correctly?
Of course not, not unlike politicians who violate the Constitution at every turn.
Yes you are correct Kennedy. I was mistaken to believe that Vat ll was just too 'ambiguous'. So the Bishops just kind of did what they wanted to do. They didn't interpret it according to tradition. I think it was Bishop Schneider that said the entire thing needed to be overhauled. Maybe it just needs to be thrown out altogether.
Our family exchanges gifts at Epiphany. It’s more appropriate and even more importantly, everything is on sale after Dec 25.
There seemed to be an unprecedented rush to canonize Pope JPII for reasons that don't seem clear. Sainthood can't be instituted merely with emotion but must meet rigorous standards, as I understand the process, including a "verifiable" miracle due to the candidate's intercession. I'm puzzled.
He’s not a Saint. AT ALL 💯
This is a post comment I made to Taylor Marshall's podcast on Abp. Vigano's statement that Francis is not the pope, but I think it has value as a comment for this podcast:
."...what happens if...such and such happens in your parish..?" Regrettable, abominable, and of course you should walk out and not return; but that is not the ROOT of the problem "which must be addressed." The root of the problem is two- fold, double layered, if you will.The top layer: 1. A manifest heretic ("notorius in fact", as per canon law) cannot be validly elected to the papacy; and 2. a validly elected pope who embraces and teaches heresy and is pertinacious (will not be corrected) automatically and without any legal process puts himself outside the church and loses his office and all jurisdiction. The layer below this - the sinister and deadly poisonous root of this root - is the heretical teaching of found in Vatican II, and especially the heresy that non-Catholics of any stripe can be saved in any religion whatever : that they do NOT need to believe in Christ as universal Saviour and confess the integral Catholic Faith (in the case of those who have reached the age of reason); and, for all, to receive the Laver of Regeneration and be born again, thus entering and becoming living, "actual members" (Pius XII) of the Mystical Body of Christ, the Roman Catholic Church. This sub-root is the source of all Bergoglio's heresies and mortal sins of commission, as it was in the case of all of his V II predecessors. Thus, ALL of them believed that there is salvation outside the Catholic Church by some sort of, even implicit desire, which is a heresy condemned and anathematized many times by the authentic magisterium; and the rational is that of J P II: that because God assumed our humanity in the incarnation, therefore "each and every man is united to Christ forever" and are in reality all "Christians" (Catholics, if that even matters to them), whether they know it or not, or like it or not. simply by virtue of the great dignity of his/her - their - humanity. Bergoglio is simply and faithfully (and rigidly) following in the footsteps of his heretical V II predecessors, and the HERETICAL VATICAN COUNCIL II they created and tirelessly promoted , whose fundamental heresy was the above - a heresy very much alive in the Roman seminaries well before the Council, as is seen in the the sad case of Abp.Lefebvre.....
We MUST get to the root of the problem, and not waste any more time or words on the poisonous fruits. Bergoglio is not a pope, of course, because he is not a Catholic; and he is not a Catholic because he believes that all men are (possibly/probably) saved for the above reason, their human dignity and the love of God for it overriding all other considerations - even mortally sinful immoral behavior, and of course undemocratic, too stiff and clerical De Fide Doctrine. and especially the defined dogmatic teaching of the Church on the requirements for salvation.
Also it must be stated that Vatican II does contain heresies, not just ambiguities. And also that doctrine was magisterially defined as in the "DOGMATIC constitution on the Church" As for the three "saints" mentioned their canonizations were invalid simply because a non Catholic antipope, a heretic who is not a member of the Church, has no jurisdiction or power to canonize anyone.
For the real story about the Vatican II Council see: "Vatican II: Council of Apostasy" at vaticancatholic.com;
I’m reading Dr E Michael Jones newest book “The Holocaust Narrative” which explains what happened at V2 and the involvement of Fr Joseph Ratzinger. It is truly eye-opening.
B16 was a liberal. He realized that later.
A football team gets shellacked 49-0. The losing coach: greatest victory ever. Except we didn’t implement the offense. That’s v2.
read the article "How Jews Changed Catholic Thinking" in the January 1966 issue of LOOK Magazine, published one month after Vatican 2, it mentions the B'nai B'rith involvment in V-2.
wonderful, well explained and makes eminent sense
I remember PF saying something to the effect of "it takes up to 100 years for a council to be fully implemented..."
I remember someone else mentioning something about needing "75-100 years," for something else too...hmmmm
Sure! Like Satan who asked for a hundred years to destroy the Church. Wonder if PF was designated 🧐. God bless Msg Lefebvre.
Sixty years in n how's it looking.
pope lofton video incoming.
Von Hildebrand was saying what Dr Marshall was saying about 50 years prior!
Hilderbrand was anti Nazi. So cannot be trusted.,
If the Council wasn't really implemented , then why did everything change ?
They haven't finished, they did a lot, but their ultimate goals they are now trying to bring forth, starting with the dismantling of the Latin Mass.
What specifically did the bishop do or not do to carry out v2? What specific instruction did they ignore? If it's a nonbinding pastoral council, who was required to do anything? Regards, a lot happened since v2 in a head-first rush into disaster for both Church and world, and no one who loved v2 complained.
For a wider 2000 year view of the infiltration read “The plot against the Church” by Maurice Pinay 1962 ( also available on audio)
Wait until Kennedy discovers the errors of Vatican 1! Imagine a Pope Francis with the same authority and deference of a Pius X. Traditionalists need to slow their role on the Papacy until the modernist dialectic is purged from the hierarchy.
Yes they keep moving the goal posts and changing the rules
Modernism at play. The contrived need for change and reformation, becomes constant and never ending. Tradition has no place in this spinning vortex.
Kennedy, you are starting to grow on me. You are starting to grow on me. Speak the truth young man
.
John Paul the Second took my attention, what miracles do they give to justify sainthood for him.
None of any magnitude. I think he blessed some sick baby who subsequently got better. That was best they had to present . The miracle for John 23 was even more sketchy. Some coal miners trapped in a mining disaster thought they seen some dim glowing angelic being which gave hope for the ongoing rescue.
All the gods of the Gentiles are demons as Psalm 95:5 says. John Paul II praised all the false religions of the world to his death. He organized the Assisi abomination. He kissed the Koran. He received a blessing from a Hindu "priest". He taught that every man was god. He made a mockery of Catholic martyrs who died for the true faith by his religious indifferantism. He never showed any signs of repentance.
Miracles attributed to him are false signs and wonders. I recommend watching the video, "The Antichrist's Distinguishing Mark".
We miss your live videos so i can get the notifications
Hoping in the new year to go live more. Been pretty crazy this year with wife getting hurt then hard pregnancy. But I plan in the new year to be live more. Thanks for your support!
@@MereTradition🙏🏼
Ha. "True Spirit" like "Missing Link."
I’m not sure that just because someone is regarded as a Saint or even a “great” necessarily means they were effective in their office. I think George Weigel said it best “Pope John Paul II was a great priest and a great prophet, and 2 out of three isn’t bad.”
He was a good man, but waa not adept at managing the Marianas trench deep corruption in the Vatican Bank. NOr forceful enough in keeping wayward priests in line. He was adamant in his condemnation of Liberation Theology, but could not curtail its popularity among the clergy in Latin America. The same applied to Communion in the hand, altar girls and the widespread infilration of the priestly orders by homosexuals. Much of what comprises the Pachapappa Francis Pontifacy would not have been possible without the legacy of Pope John Paul II.
@@LUIS-ox1bvAgree completely. But I think this makes Kennedy’s argument not quite as sound. Just Because JPII was a a Saint and Great it does not necessarily follow that he would do what’s best for the Church. Intellectual defects, unculpable weaknesses etc. could allow for his personal holiness and failings when it comes to Church governance. I do however think Kennedy IS correct in the assessment that VatII and the NO Mass ARE huge instruments in the demolition of the Church in our time.
@@ThanksStJoseph Very much so!
I am trying really really really hard to accept vatican 2 please help me I really want to be a vati2bro but its just not happening for me ; how are we supposed to convert anyone to the true faith ; its such a can of worms for missionary reasons
Sounds like the “Vatican II bros” are following the Drunkard’s Search (aka searching under the streetlight). That follows the joke about the cop finding the drunk looking under the street lamp for the keys he lost in the park because “that’s where the light is.”
Cue the next video critique by Michael Lofton😂
The tree is judged by its fruits!
That line towards the end was gold, “you kind of start sounding like a communist.”
it’s known the electric toaster has been the greatest thing since sliced bread
Kennedy, this is an important video. More of this, please. I myself see it pretty clearly now, it's coming into focus. The problem ultimately is...Vatican II. Thank you for your perspicacious analysis. At some point, we need to speak privately by email or cell. No idea how to arrange that(?). I am an American, 58 years old. University of Notre Dame graduate (Great Books, '87). But I am also a graduate of the University of Ottawa (MA '93, Ph.D '96, Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas, bilingual French). Would love to speak with you. Please let me know how to contact you; I can give you my private email or cell as needed. Thanks man.
"The Spirit of Truth guided the Second Vatican Council."
Yeah, the same "Spirit of Truth" that inspired Rene Descartes.
Amen
"They" are not going to canonize Benedict XVI if the "saloon bouncer" has anything to say about...!
V2 lowered the drawbridge and opened the castle
doors to the World, which previously could only sneak in through cracks.
'Gnosticism is the Root of Modernity' on orthodoxreflections.
V2 was about putting Mother Mary ‘in the closet’…quote from Fr Muir. 1King13 reveals that this leaves the altar ‘rent’. The restoration comes with returning her back to a place of honor….
Pope Paul VI new he was handing down the authority, it's likely why he gave up the crown (Tierra). The Tierra symbolizes that the pope is the vicar of Christ the King, he was giving up the kingship. I think the act of retiring the crown is way undervalued because the authority of the pope continued to decline ever since.
Christ (or his representative) does not give up His Kingship without destroying the kingdom (the churh).
Oh where oh where can I get the book on Infiltration?
Sainthood is becoming a participation trophy in the modern era. Not unlike The Ignoble Prize.
1. Mr. Hall, if you could please provide any passage in Lumen Gentium that undermines the pope's authority in the church regarding his relationship to the bishops, that would be greatly appreciated.
2. A dogmatic constitution on the church was in the process of being drafted at Vatican Council I, but the Franco-Prussian war of 1870 broke out and the pope had to suddenly adjourn its proceedings. When the soldiers of the newly formed Kingdom of Italy surrounded the Vatican, Pope Pius XI, in effect, became their prisoner.
3. Vatican Council II provided the opportunity to complete the dogmatic constitution on the church, solemnly promulgated under the title Lumen Gentium by Pope Paul VI on Nov. 21, 1964.
4. In Lumen Gentium's No. 25, Paragraph 3 from Chapter III, On the Hierarchical Structure of the Church and in Particular on the Episcopate, I read that (A) the infallibility of the bishops is entirely dependent upon their communion with the Roman Pontiff as their head and (B) the entire church passively participates in infallibility by receiving the teaching of the bishops in union with the pope through the protection of the Holy Spirit:
"And this infallibility with which the Divine Redeemer willed His Church to be endowed in defining doctrine of faith and morals, extends as far as the deposit of Revelation extends, which must be religiously guarded and faithfully expounded. And this is the infallibility which the Roman Pontiff, the head of the college of bishops, enjoys in virtue of his office, when, as the supreme shepherd and teacher of all the faithful, who confirms his brethren in their faith,(Cf. Lk. 22:32) by a definitive act he proclaims a doctrine of faith or morals.(Gal. 4:26; cf. Rev. 12:17) And therefore his definitions, of themselves, and not from the consent of the Church, are justly styled irreformable, since they are pronounced with the assistance of the Holy Spirit, promised to him in blessed Peter, and therefore they need no approval of others, nor do they allow an appeal to any other judgment. For then the Roman Pontiff is not pronouncing judgment as a private person, but as the supreme teacher of the universal Church, in whom the charism of infallibility of the Church itself is individually present, he is expounding or defending a doctrine of Catholic faith.(Rev. 19:7; 21:2 and 9; 22:17) The infallibility promised to the Church resides also in the body of Bishops, when that body exercises the supreme magisterium with the successor of Peter. To these definitions the assent of the Church can never be wanting, on account of the activity of that same Holy Spirit, by which the whole flock of Christ is preserved and progresses in unity of faith.(Eph. 5:26)"
5. As for the spiritual dynamics of what we are contending with in the current age, may you consider the words of Cardinal Karol Wojtyla (later Pope Saint John Paul II) on the Church and anti-Church in 1976:
Near the end of his visit, in September, Cardinal Wojtyla shared some striking words. The exact provenance of those words remains elusive to scholars, though they were reported in The Wall Street Journal as having been delivered by the future pontiff in his final speech in the United States before his departure. In one particularly dramatic passage, reprinted by the Journal Nov. 9, 1978 (shortly after he became pope), Karol Wojtyla stated: “We are now standing in the face of the greatest historical confrontation humanity has gone through. I do not think that wide circles of the American society or wide circles of the Christian community realize this fully. We are now facing the final confrontation between the Church and the anti-Church, of the Gospel versus the anti-Gospel. This confrontation lies within the plans of divine Providence; it is trial which the whole Church, and the Polish Church in particular, must take up. It is a trial of not only our nation and the Church, but, in a sense, a test of 2,000 years of culture and Christian civilization with all of its consequences for human dignity, individual rights, human rights and the rights of nations.” {Oct. 5, 2018, Paul Kengor, John Paul II’s Warning on ‘Final Confrontation’ With the ‘Anti-Church’}
[From the National Catholic Register website article /daily-news/john-paul-iis-warning-on-final-confrontation-with-the-anti-church]
How come nobody ever talks about the Chosen People & their influence on Vatican II? Malachi Martin worked on behalf of one of their lobby groups...
all you have to do is look at the fruits of the council
Hold on to your sanity , 2024 hyper novelty will be in the forefront , real history will be put in the limelight .
6:35 sounds like they’ll be spit out for being lukewarm.
Revelation 3:15-16
The Vatican II Bro's , lol, i lovie it Kennedy !
If you couldn’t implement it, then you shouldn’t have called it.
Taylor just woke up
Great show - highly interesting thank you 🔥👏😎. I definitely doubt the validity of the "Vatican II pope-saints". God bless 🙏⛪⚓ 👑.
Vatican II didn't use the Church's infallibility since it didn't define or anathematize anything.it includes some infallible declarations. But those those declarations predated Vatican II.
Crack pot member here, yes I agree with you. I am also worried about SSPX losing their churches and property. Does Pope Francis own any of them or does he have any authority to shut them down? Hope not, I just don’t know how that works.
In addition to listening to you KH and reading TM's book and Father Murr's book and Julia M's book on the SG Mafia, .I have been re-reading Our Lady of Good Success and rereading Fatima and Akita and Pope Leo XIII's encyclicals. In my opinion it is obvious we are seeing a high level on purpose spiritual nafarius infiltration, animated in humanity by those who would cooperate. Our Mother tries to mitigate the Divine Justice. It will get worse for a while because Christ allows His Mystical Body to suffer. But He will promote the Immaculate Heart of Mary to Prevail.
Last thought, since the 1500's Man has continued to offend His Mother therefore the Sancta Dei Genetrix will save the Church through Her Son, just ike she bore Her Son to save humanity.
Dominus Vobiscum
Karl Rahner book: The Shape of the Church to Come. 😮
How can one believe Vatican II, its subsequent Magisterial teachings and its harmful disciplines of Paul VI and JPII came from an indefectible and infallible church?
You just got your hair and beard done - nice
😂
Question: what dietrich von hildebrand work talks about infiltration in the Church?
🎅 MERRY CHRISTMAS ! ! !
Thank you, Pope Francis, we in the laity, thank you for your 'thoughtful gift', to us.
This is another reason, why fellow Catholics, are running for the exit doors, OUT of the Roman Catholic Church !
I've heard, on one particular podcast, that Pope Francis, has had some sort of involvement with Italian Street Boys, within the locality/vicinity of the Vatican; namely, that he had been corresponding with various individuals, among that contingent (street boys). I just thought, that I would put this out there. Also, let us NOT forget the relatively recent scandal, which had involved at least one or two Cardinals, in which there was a Gay Orgy, somewhere in the vicinity of the Vatican. I do not recall, that the Holy Father, took any actions, against those individuals who had been involved. Finally, are NOT priests, who bless some sort of sin (e.g.- sexual sins), also themselves, equally condemned for such practices ? More specifically, for giving a blessing to the commission of iniquities. As Catholics, we must pray that those corrupt members of the clergy, who offer such 'blessings', sincerely repent ! As well of course, as the sinners themselves, who are participating in mortal sin.
❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤ ❤
Hard core, just like your beard! 🔥
19:33 !!!!! :D
Pointless rifle. Calibers are gimmicks.
I'm a bit off topic, but can someone explain to me how Pope John Paul ll became a Saint when the priest sex abuse scandal happened during his pontificate and he seemed clueless. No disrespect meant. I'm just confused about that issue.
Listen to Fr. Gommar Depauw "Catholic or Conciliar?
So what exactly was the 'real Vatican 2' that was never implemented?
False canonizations. And yes, Kennedy, you are getting there: we have to interpret the council as the popes interpret it; they interpret it as modernists: so they're not popes.
Ask Bella Dodd.
I suspect there are canonizations that will need to be removed from the canon very soon.
🙏🙏🙏
So if I understand you right (and I think I might agree with you/this) is that it was even more an infiltration in the 20s-40s+ of Communism than freemasonry or modernism. It also agrees with PFs emphasis on liberation theology (since liberation theology goes hand in glove with Communism). It also works with the fact that Bishop Schneider is a strong traditionalist, since he lived under Communism for quite a while.
Can a man be canonized by an anti-pope? We may need to ponder this more closely.
Vatican 2 is an idol.
Wow, that comment is inspired! It gave me chills!!
Trads talk about it all the time, its like the #1 subject 😂
It's important to understand the crisis in the church. Youth don't go, failing entire generations. In trying to be more 'relevant' it actually becomes less so.
The fruits of V2.
Kennedy brother, please make a video about the Rise of Islam in the West and how many men and women (Christian and non religious alike) are converting to it. Maybe also point out where Catholicism has failed in recent years compared to Islam and what it has to do in order to buck the trend
The majority of converts to "Islam" inside the USA are Black-Americans. Ethnic Black-Americans, not Eriteans blacks who are mostly Eastern Rite Catholics as in the case of them in Milwaukee.
While I can't speak for the UK the majority of these Black-Americans inside the USA come from violent hoodlum backgrounds. But you must have been listening the PBD on his podcast. PBD knows buisness and some other things... he does NOT know what the f__k he is talking about with this no more than the daughter of Bill Clinton. I've sat across tables from these blacks in homes in the hood with them speaking about Islam as well as the Moorish Science Religion.
These black cats--or women--are about as high a quality in character even in their Islam or Moorish Science as oh say... pagan white Nazis or Mexican Cartel members that pray to the demonic saint of death and put curses on people.
Example, recently: the gang below brought in Fentanyl from California to the Chicago region, as well as selling heroin and cocaine.
Source: The Grio (online)
Title of article: *Did an alleged Chicago gang leader graduate from the drug game to ISIS?*
Excerpts: copied & pasted in bold below:
*The complaint says Brown is the leader of the AHK gang, which traffics in narcotics in suburban Chicago and is a compilation of various Chicago gang members with long histories including the Black P Stones, Gangster Disciples, and Four Corner Hustlers. Although it is not clear if there are Islamic fundamentalists in their ranks, many of the AHK gang members are said to practice the Muslim faith.*
*The name AHK, is actually a variation on the Arabic word “ahk,” which means “brother” and Brown required that all members convert to Islam if they were not already Muslim. According to the complaint charges, Brown was radicalized while serving time in prison for a previous conviction in 2016 by watching the lectures of Shaikh Abdullah Faisal, a Muslim cleric. Abdullah Faisal was jailed in 2003 and served time in the United Kingdom for soliciting murder and attempting to foster racial hatred through his speeches.*
Catholicism has not failed. However, it has suffered the effects of the demoralization project, the goal of which is to make it seem feeble, false, and a contradiction; in response, many will apostatize. Those who remain devoted to the true faith will suffer great persecution at the hands of those left in the ape of the church. Prepare yourselves for challenges not unlike those suffered by Job. It will be very difficult, but know that He loves you, and that His strength is made perfect in weakness.
@@Laj-t9k I agree Catholicism as a religion has not nor will ever fail. However I’m referring to the direction and actions that the Church has taken up in the last 40 years or so. I would argue that urgent reform is needed across all sectors of Catholicism, even going so far as to say liturgical practices are nowhere near the priority right now. Just because we have been told a great falling away is to come does not mean we sit back and let it take more than it should’ve.
I put in a second comment which was the same as the first because my computer seemed to show, at first, that my first comment was deleted. If you see the duplicate comments, sorry!
Everyone points to vatican2 but the problem started back before the great schism
The Vatican II bros...😆
V2 was a big deal for the wrong result.
Or maybe it's satan's fault.
So the real conspiracy of VAT II is that each person becomes their own God.
,