That thing is a little nuts. But it is interesting to see how they are implementing the more advanced radar systems. I'm guessing it's pretty much made every day a bad day to be a pilot. Especially the rotor boys, lol. Though it will be neat to see if they start getting anti-radiation missiles in there to balance things out a little.
but these missiles, and its successors can target both ground and air targets, idk about these ones, but the improved ones can attack ground targets up to 6 km
Seems like something that will be pretty easy to knock out once the radar system is figured out. Though only thing that annoys me are how effective those 30mm's are. They seem more deadly against tanks then they should be, which i wonder if that's due to it being still in testing or the dumb little equation gaijin started using.
The M1A1, Challenger and Ariete had bugged damage models and missing armour components along with the incomplete Leopard A1A5 so it may not be as effective come release or next dev server
From watching this video and seeing the specs, the cannon and missiles are OP. The missiles are blast frag, not ATGMs. This is not an ADATS system. Also the shells are det-on-impact, so pen should be minimal. They fragment thin sheets of aluminum, that's why they are SPAA, not anti-armor.
The irony is that nations that have the tunguska have chopers. So the chopers become more annoying and there is nothing you can do. Iiis the tunguska going to destroy its own choppers!? I don't get it.
yep definitely gonna need to climb and do high angle dive bomb attacks to destroy that thing sooo any jet bomber with a big bomb or x amount of rockets.
You are right, and from watching the video it does look like there are only two. It looks like there are two barrels side by side, but I think the shorter barrel for each cannon is part of an aiming or performance measuring system
@@kaylum9127 I think he's more referring to its ability to evaporate tanks. I'm fine with it swatting every single piece of sky cancer out of the sky, but AA guns shouldn't be effective against anything but the lightest of vehicles. No way you should ever kill an Abrams or a T80 with one of these things.
The Tunguska is literally all we are going to see from Russia in ground battles after the patch.
I fear no man but that thing..
It scares me
That's why im buying it.
Remembers the horrors of Wargame Red Dragon
*Shudders*
*Flashbacks of a fiery hell in the air*
Cries in Apache
*cries in heli spam deck*
*laughs in VDV*
Flashback to the SPAM
Laughs in Maglan
Battlefield 3 flashbacks... holy god this thing was the most overpowered thing ever created.
Fires with the force of 1000 angry PPShs
Steve mc built from pure Stalin-ium and powered by Soviet Vodka
DDG harmonizing with the in-game menu music is the hidden treat of this video.
The rockets are fun but i think the most funny way to kill Aircraft is to lock on and then use the guns. Watch the tracers phly! ;)
phly? this is devil dog gamer
I see what you did there, my phriend
Gazut 1 ha! You guys are phunny
It states 2000rpm but that is per set of guns so its actually 4000 rpm!
there is four guns though?
@@AylaP4161 It is about 1000rpm per gun so 2000 per set and total 4000rpm
2:46 is this JoJo reference?
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Yes yes yes Oh my god🤦
Hah, loved how that M.D.460 was just casually swatted out of sky when he made attack run. That AA vehicle looks like fun times.
That thing is a little nuts. But it is interesting to see how they are implementing the more advanced radar systems. I'm guessing it's pretty much made every day a bad day to be a pilot. Especially the rotor boys, lol. Though it will be neat to see if they start getting anti-radiation missiles in there to balance things out a little.
Lightly Armored Vehicle: Exists
CAS: I'm about to end this man's whole career
Tunguska: I'm about to end this man's whole career ending career
Most under rated youtuber ever
That thing plays like the zsu 57, deadly for both tanks and aircraft
The look of those 30mm and the rate of fire kinda makes it a PPsH for Anti-Aircraft
The Tunguska driven by DevildogGamer vs. Sgt. Slaughter driving the GI Joe Equalizer?
Just waiting for people to complain about this now
I'm waiting for everyone to start bitching about the M1A1 lol
Great stuff DD!
Wondering how the AK build(s) are going? Any interest in the MP5 clone Palmetto State Armory will be releasing for the EFT series?
the missiles are actually follow your aim reticle
Why do people insist on flying straight at this machine??
I remember how OP these things were in BF3, they would just level the building you were hiding in my melting them with the machine guns hahaha
TUNGUSKA TUNGUSKA TUNGUSKA TUNGUSKA TUNGUSKA TUNGUSKA TUNGUSKA TUNGUSKA TUNGUSKA TUNGUSKA
Holy crap that things a beast
Now wait until there are SEAD aircraft with ARMs.
WILD WEASELS, MOTHERFUCKERS!
I look forward to the day that War Thunder has the AGM-45 Shrike and someday the AGM-88 HARM.
Wrong, the HARM was designed for Radar suppression, it would certainly knock out the radar and do considerable damage to the vehicle.
Tunguska is a terrifying AA gun... It's too OP. It's a horror...
Just as op as the one in arma 2
"We got T-80 from behind, Surprise Butt Sex" hahahaha 14:30
I really hope they make the tunguska missiles fire only when you have a radar lock because otherwise I could see this being an issue
but these missiles, and its successors can target both ground and air targets, idk about these ones, but the improved ones can attack ground targets up to 6 km
I wonder if they're going to add H.A.R.M missiles now???
Soon
@@TheDevildogGamer Pretty sure the T-2 Mitsubishi is just an F-4 Phantom on the F-104 Starfighter diet
Seems like something that will be pretty easy to knock out once the radar system is figured out. Though only thing that annoys me are how effective those 30mm's are. They seem more deadly against tanks then they should be, which i wonder if that's due to it being still in testing or the dumb little equation gaijin started using.
The M1A1, Challenger and Ariete had bugged damage models and missing armour components along with the incomplete Leopard A1A5 so it may not be as effective come release or next dev server
From watching this video and seeing the specs, the cannon and missiles are OP. The missiles are blast frag, not ATGMs. This is not an ADATS system. Also the shells are det-on-impact, so pen should be minimal. They fragment thin sheets of aluminum, that's why they are SPAA, not anti-armor.
It spits 🔥
Choppers at 9.7 and below are getting set up against a 10.00 tunguska. We already have fucked up BR games
at 16:31 when he hits the tiger with the missle the killcam thing in the top right shows a GBU-12 hitting
its just the model of the rocket chief
@@flatperson1306 yeah but the model is of a gbu 12
No, it isnt its missile kinda looks like a GBU-12 but has differences
"Choppers are worthless now"
Good
It looks good at removing ERA.
The irony is that nations that have the tunguska have chopers. So the chopers become more annoying and there is nothing you can do. Iiis the tunguska going to destroy its own choppers!? I don't get it.
Tunguska?, so does that mean it explodes for no reason?
yep definitely gonna need to climb and do high angle dive bomb attacks to destroy that thing sooo any jet bomber with a big bomb or x amount of rockets.
Time to change to arma style of playing choppers now
Did you realise its the fastest missile in the game going at 900ms XD
Tunguska = AE anti everything
This monstrosity is a super Kugel Cancer with AGMs that even gets to kill tanks !! Think When The terminator Become, Fear!!!
#awsome
The verrygood attack on Tunguska is a group of 30 Tunguska tank in group formation
They could have told me it was made for anti infantery combat. I would have been very sorry for the poor poor infantery....
just wait for the SA-22 greyhound
I want that along with my Type 90 Jap lineup pls someone bend the fabric of reality and make it happen...
Lets make it as OP as it was in Arma 2
wait does the tunguska's missiles work as fire and forget?
sadly no so gulag
its Missile not fire and forget?
Am i the only one who likes the shilka more?
Doesn't it have a special suspension mechanic
yep it does have a pneumatic suspension
Since when do you play war thunder I thought you played dcs or arma
He dose
you killed me 4:20 :D lmao dont know why 2s6 missile flied so slow though
Pretty sure looking them up online they only have 2 guns. And looking at the vehicle I am strugging to see the extra 2 guns
You are right, and from watching the video it does look like there are only two. It looks like there are two barrels side by side, but I think the shorter barrel for each cannon is part of an aiming or performance measuring system
So we need HARM missiles now....
is this barron/?
have they closed the dev server ? i cant seem to access anymore
Yes
@@TheDevildogGamer any idea when its gonna reopen?
Humvee Avenger pls
try the T-2!
GePaRD CoPyCAt
Bf4 be like:
Amazing
Typical OP Russian machine!
2:54 What?How the hell you pen here?If tank have around 80mm side?
Good end:)
russian power sic toy
That thing is so op it makes me want to puke
Not really have you seen top tier recently missiles coming from space. And it's a 10.0 AA should re-balance the AH1Z's sitting 5+ Km away.
@@kaylum9127 I think he's more referring to its ability to evaporate tanks. I'm fine with it swatting every single piece of sky cancer out of the sky, but AA guns shouldn't be effective against anything but the lightest of vehicles. No way you should ever kill an Abrams or a T80 with one of these things.
The First