It’s a lot more balanced in 1v1, technically grenadiers are the worst baseline inf in game so the mg42 is supposed to make up for it. But mg42 is slow to turn compared to maxim hecka fast turn, so flanks are better. But in 4v4 the “lane” is hella small so flanks are less of a problem. Axis is much better in 4v4 sadly, the most popular mode
It's hard to compare individual units without considering the rest of the army. Maxims don't have great stats but SOV team weapons in general are tanky because of 6-man, and even tankier when you consider than conscripts can merge into them. The Germans do have better heavies than what the Allies can field, but since Axis heavy TDs are doctrinal, a lot can come down to the commanders of each team.
Or another example, Katyusha vs Stukas, Stukas are way more accurate with this thin line of fire vs the wide round one of katyusha that can simply miss. btw, german vet 5 is equal to vet 3 of allies?
@@MrHellboy112 Stuka's base barrage is better than the Katyusha, but it's also more expensive and requires dedicated sidetech into mechanized. In 4v4 the sidetech isn't a problem but you will almost never see it in 1v1. Katyusha is squishier but the time between the sound of rockets and the rockets landing is the shortest, and with the creeping barrage it's basically a walking stuka with more range. OKW vet 5 is harder to get than allied vet 3.
![I BUILT 14 MORTARS!? [4v4 Whiteball Express] - Company of Heroes 2](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QsWYaF6P7pU/mqdefault.jpg)
COH2 players when you lose: "kys trash lmao"
COH2 players when you win: "tryhard jerks"
remember when people had sportsmanship?
reminded me one of older videos where dude was like: "you watch too much skippy" when skippy got his blob with goliaths)
They never counter those 2 elephants. I love your "never give up, never surrender" videos! GGs
I hate it when you asked for assistance many times and nobody go to help you out without a single unit.
Skippy kinda needy tho to be fair
He was muted half of the match.
i was too but then i realized he was muted haha... they weren't ignoring him
23:41 one body flew over the house
Haha Sturmpanzer IV go boom
Is 2 better than 3?
Stay in mute= streamer problems 😂
Helping hans level brumbar play
Commenting for the algorithm, but Skippy playing axis is just not the same😢
It's just me or germans have simply better units? for example maxim is crap in compare to mg 42 (not talking about the ones from commanders)
It’s a lot more balanced in 1v1, technically grenadiers are the worst baseline inf in game so the mg42 is supposed to make up for it. But mg42 is slow to turn compared to maxim hecka fast turn, so flanks are better. But in 4v4 the “lane” is hella small so flanks are less of a problem. Axis is much better in 4v4 sadly, the most popular mode
It's hard to compare individual units without considering the rest of the army. Maxims don't have great stats but SOV team weapons in general are tanky because of 6-man, and even tankier when you consider than conscripts can merge into them. The Germans do have better heavies than what the Allies can field, but since Axis heavy TDs are doctrinal, a lot can come down to the commanders of each team.
They do, IMO.
Or another example, Katyusha vs Stukas, Stukas are way more accurate with this thin line of fire vs the wide round one of katyusha that can simply miss. btw, german vet 5 is equal to vet 3 of allies?
@@MrHellboy112 Stuka's base barrage is better than the Katyusha, but it's also more expensive and requires dedicated sidetech into mechanized. In 4v4 the sidetech isn't a problem but you will almost never see it in 1v1. Katyusha is squishier but the time between the sound of rockets and the rockets landing is the shortest, and with the creeping barrage it's basically a walking stuka with more range.
OKW vet 5 is harder to get than allied vet 3.