Розмір відео: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Показувати елементи керування програвачем
Автоматичне відтворення
Автоповтор
Божественные вещи...
Лучшие аппараты в мире 🌍 без преувеличения
В общем, неплохие! :)
Лекарство для глаз!
И для ушей!
@@superhiend1853 Безусловно!
If only there was a cost effective "tape lifterless" upgrade for Ampex decks like this, and especially the ATR-102, for minimizing oxide shed, inherent in some of the Studer transport designs.
Which do you like the sound of better?
The ATR every time.
In their standard form, ATR is far superior. I know some people will not like it, but the A8XX series is not known for its sound quality.
Здравствуйте! Скажите примерную стоимость Ampex ATR-102 ?!
Привет, Сергей!Лучше в фб в личку пиши, зачем здесь?
На пол-дюйма с четверти запись?
Без четверти.
Are you copying one tape to the other?
Of course!From 1/4" tape to 1/2".
Interesting! I would have expected it to be the other way round; where the 1/2" tape is the Master and the 1/4" the copy.@@superhiend1853
Божественные вещи...
Лучшие аппараты в мире 🌍 без преувеличения
В общем, неплохие! :)
Лекарство для глаз!
И для ушей!
@@superhiend1853 Безусловно!
If only there was a cost effective "tape lifterless" upgrade for Ampex decks like this, and especially the ATR-102, for minimizing oxide shed, inherent in some of the Studer transport designs.
Which do you like the sound of better?
The ATR every time.
In their standard form, ATR is far superior. I know some people will not like it, but the A8XX series is not known for its sound quality.
Здравствуйте! Скажите примерную стоимость Ampex ATR-102 ?!
Привет, Сергей!
Лучше в фб в личку пиши, зачем здесь?
На пол-дюйма с четверти запись?
Без четверти.
Are you copying one tape to the other?
Of course!
From 1/4" tape to 1/2".
Interesting! I would have expected it to be the other way round; where the 1/2" tape is the Master and the 1/4" the copy.@@superhiend1853