The Absurdity of Detecting Gravitational Waves

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 січ 2017
  • A head-vaporizing laser with a perfect wavelength detecting sub-proton space-time ripples.
    Huge thanks to Prof Rana Adhikari and LIGO: ligo.org
    Here's how he felt when he learned about the first ever detection: • How Scientists Reacted...
    Thanks to Patreon supporters:
    Nathan Hansen, Donal Botkin, Tony Fadell, Saeed Alghamdi, Zach Mueller, Ron Neal
    Support Veritasium on Patreon: bit.ly/VePatreon
    A lot of videos have covered the general overview of the discovery of gravitational waves, what they are, the history of the search, when they were found but I wanted to delve into the absurd science that made the detection possible.
    When scientists want one megawatt of laser power, it's not just for fun (though I'm sure it's that too), it's because the fluctuations in the number of photons is proportional to their square root, making more powerful beams less noisy (as a fraction of their total). The smoothest mirrors were created not for aesthetic joy but because when you're trying to measure wiggles that are a fraction the width of a proton, a rough mirror surface simply won't do.
    Filmed by Daniel Joseph Files
    Music by Kevin MacLeod, www.incompetech.com "Black Vortex" (appropriately named)
    Music licensed from Epidemic Sound epidemicsound.com "Observations 2" (also appropriately named)

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12 тис.

  • @BurakBagdatli
    @BurakBagdatli 7 років тому +1393

    "The laser will evaporate your head instantly."
    "Oh, OK. Let me put on my goggles." B)

    • @seeranos
      @seeranos 7 років тому +52

      Appropriate goggles emoji is appropriate.

    • @pushkarsoni8927
      @pushkarsoni8927 7 років тому +17

      don't use the cheap ones :)

    • @TheDr00g
      @TheDr00g 7 років тому +9

      its for potential stray light

    • @darovi
      @darovi 7 років тому +53

      "MY EYES! THE GOGGLES DO NOTHING!"

    • @pushkarsoni8927
      @pushkarsoni8927 7 років тому

      i warned you .!.

  • @perrytheplatypus7563
    @perrytheplatypus7563 3 роки тому +4828

    “A megawatt will vaporize your head instantly” Good thing they have a first aid kit.

    • @VikingMan44
      @VikingMan44 3 роки тому +91

      I don't think betadine and a bandaid is going to help...

    • @majapahitsumatra5771
      @majapahitsumatra5771 3 роки тому +59

      I couldn't resist laughing man, you killed it

    • @yingxiawei821
      @yingxiawei821 3 роки тому +16

      Red sus

    • @spiralx6249
      @spiralx6249 3 роки тому +13

      Theres a wonderful (read, eye-popping) CGI effect in the first series of The Expanse, where a man's head is 'disappeared' instantly in space by a hi=speed traveling chunk of debris. I was reminded of that when he described this.

    • @lazertroll702
      @lazertroll702 3 роки тому +21

      Meh... I'll be impressed once they start using 1.21 gigawatts ...

  • @computer_toucher
    @computer_toucher 2 роки тому +1245

    Kudos for getting a "I wish more people would ask that question" from a leading scientist in his field. That must be the best compliment ever for a layman (sorry I don't know your physics credentials lol)

    • @chuckmaddox6725
      @chuckmaddox6725 2 роки тому +146

      He has a PhD

    • @shukrantpatil
      @shukrantpatil 2 роки тому

      That's a high school level question smartass .

    • @Milark
      @Milark 2 роки тому +19

      @@alexbartley3610 millions of people have a profile picture with them and their partner. It’s a normal thing. And it can be considered advertising your sexual preference.

    • @MS69CHRIS
      @MS69CHRIS 2 роки тому +63

      This Comment section wack

    • @Resolve3s
      @Resolve3s 2 роки тому +12

      @@MS69CHRIS fr

  • @slickstretch6391
    @slickstretch6391 2 роки тому +924

    When being hit by that laser, you cease being biology and become physics.

    • @ilovepineapple6393
      @ilovepineapple6393 2 роки тому +29

      Damn that hits hardddd

    • @untergehermuc
      @untergehermuc 2 роки тому +39

      And in the end philosophy.

    • @seth7745
      @seth7745 2 роки тому +20

      @@untergehermuc You need a much bigger LASER for that transition

    • @micahhunter5452
      @micahhunter5452 2 роки тому +8

      all biology is is physics

    • @slickstretch6391
      @slickstretch6391 2 роки тому +13

      @@micahhunter5452 Well yeah, technically everything is physics.

  • @eggyrepublic
    @eggyrepublic 3 роки тому +3347

    5:17 so not only are football fields a unit of length in America, footballs is also a unit of volume.

    • @chromiyum6849
      @chromiyum6849 3 роки тому +194

      THIS IS AMERICA

    • @Prototheria
      @Prototheria 3 роки тому +288

      @@chromiyum6849 If it was really America, he would have used cubic hamburgers.

    • @pflaffik
      @pflaffik 3 роки тому +112

      Unacceptable, only olympic swimmingpools is approved as an american unit of volume. Still better than british, the last few years BBC insisted on using dinosaurs as a unit for everything, and just like other british products it doesnt work.

    • @Prototheria
      @Prototheria 3 роки тому +84

      @@pflaffik I'm sorry, but that is absolute nonsense. The British have long used unladen swallows to perform various distance/time equations and not, my good Sir, dinosaurs as you so inaccurately implied. Now then. Good DAY!

    • @MrDino1953
      @MrDino1953 3 роки тому +21

      EggyRepublic - I’m surprised he didn’t use the Australian unit of volume which is Sydney Harbours of water, given his Australian roots.

  • @viclincoln1366
    @viclincoln1366 3 роки тому +8197

    I love scientists who don't care to iron their shirts even for an interview .

    • @carso1500
      @carso1500 3 роки тому +949

      For the way he speaked initially it appeared like he wasnt really all that thrilled by the interview, it's posible that this isnt his first interview and most people can barely understand what he is talking about so why even matter, his question about the infrared light wave lenght being bigger than the distortion caused by the gravitational wave surprised him for the best, you can see how lively he suddenly become

    • @kingk2405
      @kingk2405 3 роки тому +99

      He is not in the demanding position so why bother .

    • @bhavikshah1946
      @bhavikshah1946 3 роки тому +228

      Because he is an typical Indian

    • @theoverseer393
      @theoverseer393 3 роки тому +174

      Or those that wear whatever suits them. They’re the real scientists

    • @bigsherk42069
      @bigsherk42069 3 роки тому +126

      @@bhavikshah1946 I just thought that. Lololol dude my dad is a brown Asian and I was gonna say this. My dad is a giant Filipino and never irons anything lol

  • @TLguitar
    @TLguitar 2 роки тому +181

    This interview made me think how the science of physics is basically matter trying to understand itself.

    • @vidyasagardaud8518
      @vidyasagardaud8518 2 роки тому +5

      *Biologically Organised Matter

    • @shrooman768
      @shrooman768 2 роки тому +7

      bro, science in general is just matter trying to understand matter

    • @TLguitar
      @TLguitar 2 роки тому +2

      @@shrooman768 That's the case mostly when discussing natural science rather than, let's say, formal science. And in natural science I'd say all branches are ultimately sourced within physics.

    • @TheLuminousOne
      @TheLuminousOne Рік тому

      Consciousness.

  • @Mormodes
    @Mormodes 3 роки тому +187

    I really wish this channel was around when I was younger. The way information is presented in your videos makes it much easier to conceptualize and understand. Back in High School we were sat in front of a book and told to read it. We didn't care, we had a million other things to think about besides reading a bland book. I can only hope the kids watching these kinds of videos today can see the wonder in what's happening. LIGO is an incredible feat, and I'd heard the name before, but never understood what it really was doing. Thank you!

  • @erikig
    @erikig 7 років тому +6807

    Rana Adhikari looks like the scientist you have to drag out of the bar to save the world at the end of a sci-fi movie when the pencil necked number crunchers have failed

    • @LuisSierra42
      @LuisSierra42 6 років тому +172

      stop watching movies, they are making you dumb

    • @Commandelicious
      @Commandelicious 6 років тому +281

      Going "wubwubwubwubbrrrrrrr LETS DO THIS!" and fires the gigawatt laser at some atoms

    • @ViperoK
      @ViperoK 6 років тому +120

      Thats oddly specific

    • @nosuchthing8
      @nosuchthing8 6 років тому +85

      I haven't laughed so hard in a long time. An awesome comment!

    • @6884
      @6884 6 років тому +9

      or to save the other bar customers from slipping so hard on the floor after all the chicks went Niagara

  • @rens6374
    @rens6374 7 років тому +3834

    the guy looked so cool with his glasses lol

    • @chrisvellner3922
      @chrisvellner3922 7 років тому +50

      Issued safety equipment is mandatory

    • @martinv6777
      @martinv6777 7 років тому +153

      Chris Vellner safety is numba one priority

    • @DerFrischkopf
      @DerFrischkopf 7 років тому +12

      Rens and his crocs!

    • @AtodaZ23
      @AtodaZ23 7 років тому +32

      Damn I was just about to comment that lol, he kinda reminded me of Morpheus

    • @Dhakhar
      @Dhakhar 7 років тому +4

      lmfao, well played Sir.

  • @Rinka277
    @Rinka277 3 роки тому +159

    The guy explained the most advanced technology i have ever seen in 5 minutes using baby language.
    I feel like i am a scientist!

  • @sploofmcsterra4786
    @sploofmcsterra4786 2 роки тому +107

    The challenge of removing the interference was crazy. The clouds themselves had a gravitational effect. And the silica threads would resonate, causing unique spikes in the readings. Wild stuff.

  • @jojojorisjhjosef
    @jojojorisjhjosef 7 років тому +343

    Its funny to me how there are physicists and engineers that know everything about lasers, do everything with lazers, and suddenly they are dealing with cosmology.

    • @Voidsworn
      @Voidsworn 7 років тому +52

      Not really. Science tends to be interdisciplinary, but still cool.

    • @Chronically_ChiII
      @Chronically_ChiII 7 років тому +80

      Mathematicians and physicists can end up everywhere because how pure their branch is.

    • @KaiPlews
      @KaiPlews 7 років тому +55

      jojojorisjhjosef lasers get involved in anything as long as you science hard enough.

    • @Dream0Asylum
      @Dream0Asylum 7 років тому +62

      Everything is physics. EVERYTHING. Geology is physics. Cosmology is physics. Chemistry is physics. Engineering is physics. Physiology is physics. Photonics is physics.
      Being a specialist does not invalidate the cornerstones by which all other disciplines operate.

    • @MuffinTastic
      @MuffinTastic 7 років тому +11

      why do you people have this urge to correct him? all he's saying is that it's interesting, not "incorrect"

  • @fluffmallow1159
    @fluffmallow1159 5 років тому +694

    Orange crocs and those shades? what a legend

    • @ZesPak
      @ZesPak 4 роки тому +33

      The shades are maybe mandatory in the "laser zone".

    • @hamjudo
      @hamjudo 4 роки тому +9

      @@Vallecaucanisimo
      There are a whole bunch of lasers in the real-time measurement system that damps external vibrations. There are more lasers to worry about than the one in the tube.
      They were standing next to a semi-functional scale model, far from LIGO. They have a very simple policy to protect people from the big beam. When people are working in that building, they shut off the beam. LIGO can't produce good data when there are people or other masses moving near by.
      The scale model is used to test ideas before they start working on the real thing. It is functional in the sense that it is comparing laser beams in a vacuum, and there are real sensors being tested. It is not functional in the sense that it can't detect a real gravity wave. They have some other mechanism to move the mirrors do they can test hardware and software.

    • @hamjudo
      @hamjudo 4 роки тому +4

      @@Vallecaucanisimo No problem.
      Some graduate student once put a laser enclosure back together wrong in a distant university research lab, and bad things happened. So now the safety engineers at universities and national laboratories want everyone to be at least two mistakes away from blindness, death, or dismemberment.

    • @derekboyt3383
      @derekboyt3383 4 роки тому +2

      Voice: Kent, wake up!
      Kent: Who is this?
      Voice: It’s Jesus Kent! Stop playing with yourself!
      Kent: It is god.

    • @TIBYCOLLINS
      @TIBYCOLLINS 4 роки тому +2

      Future project being guarding us from black holes. Yessir absolute legend

  • @FatherManus
    @FatherManus 2 роки тому +22

    5:35 This guy is a mad scientist in the making.

  • @thedanyesful
    @thedanyesful 2 роки тому +3

    Out of all the Veritasium videos I've watched, this is my favorite. Dr. Adhikari's responses were both educational and entertaining.

  • @MRSLAV
    @MRSLAV 5 років тому +6736

    Imagine explaining what you do to your investors

    • @gustavlicht9620
      @gustavlicht9620 5 років тому +551

      Well, you have to apply for this money, so you need to show pretty solid motivation. There are tons of people competing for research grants and you have to explain why you and not the next person.

    • @kelvin254kk
      @kelvin254kk 5 років тому +41

      send them this video

    • @MRSLAV
      @MRSLAV 5 років тому +40

      They would need a time machine.

    • @nathanwoodruff9422
      @nathanwoodruff9422 5 років тому +55

      All you have to do is dream up something so absurd that sounds intelligent that will take forever to prove if provable that you have life long income for basically doing really nothing. That is what this is. If you are the only one that can prove it, you can go hunting ghosts all you like. Gravity is a function of wave energy, nothing more. Gravity is also not a pull force but a push force from within.

    • @semiolith
      @semiolith 5 років тому +13

      In fact, the vague and airy cliches that LIGO must rely upon to explain its particular power to transcend loopholes are no different than dishonesty. Dishonesty is the kernel upon which investment accrete. Hubris lately has been unprecidented.

  • @carso1500
    @carso1500 3 роки тому +2126

    I just love how adhikari face completly iluminated once he mentioned the size of the light wave, it was like he was expecting some idiot that would not really understand what he was talking about (like he has probably have to deal with before) and was just extatic to find someone that also talks his tongue

    • @sumitraturi7791
      @sumitraturi7791 2 роки тому +18

      @@ymbhiojtukburtbuyt568 maybe pr maybe not

    • @vedangratnaparkhi
      @vedangratnaparkhi 2 роки тому +57

      Good thing Derek is a PHD in physics

    • @slickstretch6391
      @slickstretch6391 2 роки тому +143

      I know that feeling. When I suddenly realize that the person I'm talking to understands and has some knowledge of their own on the subject, it's super exciting. Especially when you're used to explaining a thing every. single. time.

    • @leisureb
      @leisureb 2 роки тому +3

      I was going to make the same comment :)

    • @h1o84
      @h1o84 2 роки тому +1

      👍

  • @teppec
    @teppec 2 роки тому +12

    I always like coming back to some of your older content and looking at it with eyes that have now seen some of the fruits of this research. Would be interesting to do a follow-up on LISA and see some in depth information on how they are looking at transitioning this project to space to be able to detect even more gravitational waves.

  • @TheTuubster
    @TheTuubster 2 роки тому +35

    So, if I understood it right: While the light being inside the space when it is stretched is stretched too, new light that is entering the stretched space is actually travelling the difference in distance due to the stretching.

    • @amangupta5323
      @amangupta5323 2 роки тому

      Yes, because the gravitational waves haven't yet stretched the new light. At least, that's what I understood.

    • @vidyasagardaud8518
      @vidyasagardaud8518 2 роки тому +1

      I don't know what you understood but it is different from what i understood which makes me feel im understanding the wrong thing.

    • @laestrella9727
      @laestrella9727 2 роки тому

      I understood that they were making the tube 'boggier' to get through... (!) and not much else... As in.. I'm not sure how that then helps them with their comparison..

    • @josepedrogaleanogomez4870
      @josepedrogaleanogomez4870 Рік тому

      Yeah, and they measure the difference in time it took the new light to travel the stretche space in reference to the time it should have taken, since the wavelenght is fixed.
      But i feel like i dont understand it well enough.

    • @nmarbletoe8210
      @nmarbletoe8210 Рік тому +1

      yes, the key being that the gravitational wavelength is VERY long, so while it passes the light goes back and forth in the detector many times.

  • @carlosponchio1869
    @carlosponchio1869 4 роки тому +2760

    that white shirt was last ironed in 1988, May 12.

    • @randomdude9135
      @randomdude9135 4 роки тому +98

      He barely has human interaction. So he's lazy 😂

    • @Cosmic_Love
      @Cosmic_Love 4 роки тому +58

      Did you measure it with gravitational waves?

    • @SirNyanPanda
      @SirNyanPanda 4 роки тому +181

      @EZIO AUDITORE DA FIRENZE What does this have to do with anything? He's billion times smarter than you

    • @jehezz
      @jehezz 4 роки тому +68

      @@SirNyanPanda its just a joke why so serious?

    • @ahamedmaluk1493
      @ahamedmaluk1493 4 роки тому +4

      So how the frick you got the date may 12 lol

  • @OuterRem
    @OuterRem 5 років тому +534

    Rana Adhikari is the prof whose classes you tried your hardest to register for, only to realize that it was already waitlisted at 2.7 femtoseconds. I'd kill to have this guy as a lecturer.

    • @SukacitaYeremia
      @SukacitaYeremia 4 роки тому +11

      Lol, did a pack of bacteria waitlisted him?

    • @marknasia5293
      @marknasia5293 4 роки тому +5

      OuterRem that is who designed that project, easy A scientists that went on to secure govt grants

    • @derekboyt3383
      @derekboyt3383 4 роки тому +3

      And that is why he doesn’t lecture.

    • @karthickmurali598
      @karthickmurali598 4 роки тому +4

      Did you just said you would kill someone? I am calling the cops

    • @TucsonDude
      @TucsonDude 3 роки тому

      Meh.

  • @abhayagarwal5097
    @abhayagarwal5097 7 місяців тому +10

    Didn't understood much but mind blowing how motivated humans are to do things that would take unimaginable size and money to build instruments that could have detected these things easily.

  • @litmusaero2645
    @litmusaero2645 2 роки тому +41

    I love that guy, he’s so smart but so funny and relatable. I wish more people could be like him and our father derick

  • @PeteBetter
    @PeteBetter 3 роки тому +753

    A professor who can explain the highly complex to the every day person like me is a treasure.

    • @aoaoa605
      @aoaoa605 2 роки тому +1

      Oh you are a professor!?

    • @Systenize
      @Systenize 2 роки тому +4

      The professor: 1:06

    • @michaelmacdonald2907
      @michaelmacdonald2907 Рік тому

      The measure of your understanding is your ability to explain it to others

    • @ryanwatkins7924
      @ryanwatkins7924 Рік тому

      I was just thinking about the Veritasium audience and our demographics. I wonder at what level does he tell his interviews to explain concepts and what level most of the viewership is comprised? I ain't no professor myself or nothing, but I pick up because I am able to understand the concept at a fundamental level. I had professors, actual professors, that failed to explain much less complex questions as well as these videos do. This channel is so great.

  • @brettb.7425
    @brettb.7425 4 роки тому +737

    I thought the guy was meditating before explaining this.

    • @brianhecimovich4488
      @brianhecimovich4488 3 роки тому +1

      mmmmmmmmmmmmmm Bp P p

    • @heaven4247
      @heaven4247 3 роки тому +1

      thats when I was Born.

    • @crapmailtome5621
      @crapmailtome5621 3 роки тому +4

      Hahaha..He is Indian guy..thats why.

    • @PlubusDomis
      @PlubusDomis 3 роки тому +3

      A lot of those folks do, the intelligent usually have their own morning rituals which is like a form of meditation if you think about it, whether it's sleeping in late or being productive early, everyone has a different circadian rhythm.
      Just a fun little rabbit hole that ur welcome to join me in

    • @heaven4247
      @heaven4247 3 роки тому +1

      @@PlubusDomis We,We,
      Are creature's of habit s
      I gotta have it hahaha 😉

  • @kennyalternative
    @kennyalternative 2 роки тому

    Mind expanding info. I did not understand this measuring of gravitational waves till now. Thanks for making it simple enough for me to understand.

  • @caty863
    @caty863 2 роки тому +5

    This guy is genuinely happy that finally someone is asking an intelligent question. You can tell he's used to the regular media and their stupid questions

  • @smartereveryday
    @smartereveryday 7 років тому +2292

    I really liked this man. Is it really just a Michelson Interferometer on a really incredible scale?
    Excellent job on this video. Prof Adhikari did a FANTASTIC job as well.

    • @trevorcginn
      @trevorcginn 7 років тому +96

      Thanks to UA-camrs like you and Derek, the scientists doing this kind of incredible work are able to be showcased. I think a lot of personality is cut out (more often than not) when specialists like Rana Adhikari are interviewed by cable media or documentary creators. Showing him in a casual light shows the audience that anyone can be contributing to science if they work towards it hard enough. These kind of honest interviews bring a real human element to the world of science and I'm thankful the world has people like you, Derek, and Rana. Keep being awesome! :)

    • @TCBYEAHCUZ
      @TCBYEAHCUZ 6 років тому +29

      I like how you said it's just a Michelson interferometer

    • @thesunflowchannel1995
      @thesunflowchannel1995 6 років тому +1

      SmarterEveryDay found you!

    • @pvtmill3rr
      @pvtmill3rr 5 років тому +3

      gravity doesn't exist
      ua-cam.com/video/984kY2uNLkI/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/x0EGB_o9TZM/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/0NM5q22j5VI/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/nyDey7QSgg4/v-deo.html

    • @dontomaso11
      @dontomaso11 5 років тому +2

      i dont like him

  • @1ucasvb
    @1ucasvb 7 років тому +1244

    Hah, Prof. Rana is awesome!

    • @CallMeTipz
      @CallMeTipz 7 років тому +73

      hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

    • @gurpreetsingh793
      @gurpreetsingh793 7 років тому +4

      Also, how he makes those sounds :P

    • @CookingWithCows
      @CookingWithCows 7 років тому +7

      sounded almost like... a frog... which is called rana in spanish, lol

    • @tolyaph
      @tolyaph 7 років тому +4

      He needs to get a new shirt, too ;)

    • @ChrisOrillia
      @ChrisOrillia 7 років тому +20

      He's like a Pixar character, lol.

  • @brahmburgers
    @brahmburgers Рік тому +13

    I've watched this entire video 3 times, at month's intervals, .... and it still amazes me. Thanks to everyone involved. It's sooooo cool.

  • @duaneburris7ate9
    @duaneburris7ate9 7 місяців тому

    I'm so glad someone was around to see this, Dave

  • @ariestheram5693
    @ariestheram5693 4 роки тому +3813

    Scientists : "We are able to detect gravitational waves from the collision of two black holes 1.3 billion light years away"
    Also scientists : "For the last time, the Earth is round"

    • @ogi22
      @ogi22 4 роки тому +53

      ROTFL, that was a good one :D

    • @sarthakshakya5500
      @sarthakshakya5500 4 роки тому +97

      also some people : earth is flat

    • @KougaJ7
      @KougaJ7 4 роки тому +152

      Some people are born smart, some people are born stupid. And some of them just don't care what the truth is, but prefer to spout whatever comes to their minds instead. :) There's a person for anything.

    • @elizasales8204
      @elizasales8204 4 роки тому +13

      and we don't are smarter people if we just believe in them not knowing the why that earth be round

    • @MrRichiarditya
      @MrRichiarditya 4 роки тому +19

      Sphere not round

  • @SandlotRider
    @SandlotRider 7 років тому +446

    I Detect a Gravitational Meme is Born 1:06

    • @Master_Therion
      @Master_Therion 7 років тому +76

      "Mantra meditation for physicists."

    • @BeHappyTo
      @BeHappyTo 7 років тому +81

      gravitational mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmeme

    • @denninosyos
      @denninosyos 7 років тому +3

      Sandlot Rider À

  • @mattsmith2247
    @mattsmith2247 Рік тому +1

    I'm really glad I found this video because I first learned about LIGO in the episode on Black holes from the show Strip the Cosmos. And I had so many questions. So I'm loving this video fir asking those questions

  • @derpnerpwerp
    @derpnerpwerp 2 роки тому +7

    I'm really glad you did this video.. I was reading about this the other day and I had the exact same question about environmental noise.. I asked on reddit and I kinda got snobby answers.. thanks!

  • @publiclyshamed5383
    @publiclyshamed5383 3 роки тому +517

    I’m always the smartest person in the room when I’m watching Veritasium alone.

    • @floreaciprian9742
      @floreaciprian9742 2 роки тому +36

      Sometimes i feel like the dumbest person in the room when im watching Veritasium alone

    • @abhineetthaire4602
      @abhineetthaire4602 2 роки тому

      @@floreaciprian9742 well you can be both the smartest and the dumbest in the room at once!

    • @AtPrEd
      @AtPrEd Рік тому +11

      @@floreaciprian9742 Schrödingers Intelligence 😆

    • @CdFMasterVideo
      @CdFMasterVideo Рік тому +3

      ​​@@floreaciprian9742 Quantum superposition says you can be both as long as there's no observator in the room

    • @childcannibalism5080
      @childcannibalism5080 11 місяців тому +1

      ​@@floreaciprian9742 It's a 50/50 either I feel extremely dumb or very smort

  • @veritasium
    @veritasium  7 років тому +929

    Prof Rana Adhikari is clearly a star. Here's how he felt when he learned of G-wave detection: ua-cam.com/video/ViMnGgn87dg/v-deo.html
    Those glasses provide laser protection - the laser in that lab won't vaporize your head but it could burn your retinas.

    • @adamgreen7742
      @adamgreen7742 7 років тому

      Kissy kissy.

    • @subhoghosal7
      @subhoghosal7 7 років тому +3

      Veritasium Name should be pronounced as Rana Odhikari ( 'A' is pronounced in Bengali as 'O')

    • @Luisitococinero
      @Luisitococinero 7 років тому +2

      +Veritasium
      Next step will be using two slits for studying the diffraction of gravitational waves!!!

    • @veritasium
      @veritasium  7 років тому +45

      I believe the upgrade to 1MW they're implementing right now. The 1064 nm lasers have excellent stability, low noise and they are not huge - this makes them ideal for this purpose. BTW older g-wave interferometers used green lasers (that's why Rana's glasses were green).

    • @uhmGrimz
      @uhmGrimz 7 років тому +1

      Veritasium Hey why are you guys wearing the glasses in there? Some protection?

  • @carrickrichards2457
    @carrickrichards2457 Рік тому

    An intriguing glimpse into new possibilities and old ones. Thank you

  • @joftenly
    @joftenly 3 роки тому +18

    "Guys... science is sometimes boring...."
    "Yeah but not if we wear sunglasses."
    Production Manager: "We wearing sunglasses!!!"
    Boom science is cool now.

    • @thekinginyellow1744
      @thekinginyellow1744 2 роки тому

      When you are in an environment with that kind of laser power special anti-laser glasses are required. a single dust particle in the beam could deflect enough light to fry your retinas

  • @josephastier7421
    @josephastier7421 4 роки тому +512

    1:25 The Alpha Centauri vs human hair comparison is killing me.

    • @MMCKB
      @MMCKB 4 роки тому +5

      True 10 mm ≠ 0.1 mm :)

    • @justinl2009
      @justinl2009 3 роки тому +2

      @Progressive Dude same, though it's Pokemon not CoD in my case.

    • @dominic9517
      @dominic9517 3 роки тому +2

      seriously.... makes no sense

    • @timoms1748
      @timoms1748 3 роки тому +3

      @John Loibl u don’t

    • @dumbass3843
      @dumbass3843 3 роки тому +6

      @@dominic9517 lets say you are measuring a table that is 30 cm long with a measuring tape
      Is the the table 30.000001 cm or 29.999999 cm
      Now imagine one end of the table is milkway and the other end is alpha santori
      Is the distance and hair width longer or one hair width shorter

  • @Jimmeyyyyy
    @Jimmeyyyyy 7 років тому +150

    That guy is so chill

    • @27plays
      @27plays 7 років тому +4

      :P yeah

    • @AkashRajDahal
      @AkashRajDahal 7 років тому +8

      lol.. The guy is a Nepali

    • @wyomingptt
      @wyomingptt 7 років тому +1

      He sounds American

    • @Ophiax
      @Ophiax 7 років тому

      pGpants
      indians ask all my friends for nudes, not my favourite

    • @27plays
      @27plays 7 років тому +1

      ElectroBarb who is ceo of google? microsoft? Adobe Systems? MasterCard..... see im not pretending we are god... but we are kinda cool not only us but we all on earth are amazing, beautiful peoples ;) accept every person's opinion.. and those who asked for n**es are kinda exceptions.. whom you found every where else too... lets not fight on these some words and enjoy the nature of science and explore through Veritasium

  • @straightdrive6192
    @straightdrive6192 Рік тому +2

    level of expertise is known in how simple someone can explain a complex topic in their domain.

  • @alastermcdonach2020
    @alastermcdonach2020 2 роки тому

    Ron Drever described this in a lecture I attended in 1976. Thank you Ron.

  • @besmart
    @besmart 7 років тому +1991

    A megawatt *continuous* laser? That's a helluva beam. I toured the Petawatt laser in Austin but that thing only fires for like a trillionth of a second

    • @johnarbuckle2619
      @johnarbuckle2619 7 років тому +38

      It's Okay To Be Smart I love your channel

    • @willwhite1987
      @willwhite1987 7 років тому +28

      I thought he said light was discrete, duh.

    • @ABaumstumpf
      @ABaumstumpf 7 років тому +69

      I want one of those - gonna troll my cat with a 1 megawatt :D

    • @derek
      @derek 7 років тому +105

      It's Okay To Be Smart the power of the laser itself is much lower but they resonate it in a cavity to build up to 1MW

    • @ABaumstumpf
      @ABaumstumpf 7 років тому +13

      Gameboygenius www.ligo.caltech.edu/page/ligos-ifo
      Seems like 750 kW can be stored in the arms.

  • @Prototheria
    @Prototheria 3 роки тому +691

    3:11 I tell my wife the same thing.

    • @TheArchit1
      @TheArchit1 3 роки тому +10

      haha

    • @bhaaratsharma6023
      @bhaaratsharma6023 3 роки тому +5

      Because it's too small?

    • @BlackVogel1
      @BlackVogel1 3 роки тому +53

      Can you measure it?
      *Changes size 100 times a second*

    • @Axairu
      @Axairu 3 роки тому +13

      She gotta meausre it in milimeters

    • @benm8407
      @benm8407 3 роки тому +20

      i clicked the time stamp and the advertisement i got was about consumer cellular saying
      “its that easy grandma”
      oh god oh no oh no

  • @maxfoster4383
    @maxfoster4383 Рік тому +1

    I've always been a fan of the content you and others like you (smartereveryday, vsauce, ect.) make, but recently I've been on a binge of your content. Please never stop helping us learn new things about our world!

  • @astrobua2343
    @astrobua2343 2 роки тому +6

    I watched this five times now. In my opinion, it is one of Veritasium's best. Thanks, Derek!

  • @nigglebit
    @nigglebit 5 років тому +1216

    Humans are amazing.
    We are able to detect changes to our very frame of reference *from within that frame of reference.*

    • @MisterWillow
      @MisterWillow 5 років тому +98

      That is the surprising part indeed!
      Good thing the interviewer asked explicitely how that works, and after a lame joke he clearly explained, well kind of clearly.

    • @nigglebit
      @nigglebit 5 років тому +32

      @@MisterWillow Hahaha that's so accurate! I also could understand the theory, somewhat, but the practicality is still unclear to me. Basically, I'm not enough acquainted with the field.

    • @johnterpack3940
      @johnterpack3940 5 років тому +105

      I can't wait til they can measure the pixels on the screen of the simulation we're part of.

    • @MrPhilipe711
      @MrPhilipe711 5 років тому +15

      @@nigglebit thing is, there aint much to understand.. an interaction so strong that had too much energy dispensed.. being it noticeable over our planet system noise. This energy flow wended up stretching spacetime in the direction it came from. simply then we measure two 90 degrees angle lengths using lasers. (called interferometer). which is able to pick on quantum distances being bended in reference to another (if one length is streched more than the other it will take the light from the laser a tiny bit more time causing it to when it comes back to interfere with the other light causing positive and negative patterns of interference seen as the final laser (getting brighter and darker) with different levels of intensity over time), which happened that we were able to measure with clarity.
      .

    • @Sushobhit333
      @Sushobhit333 5 років тому +2

      @@johnterpack3940 indeed haha that would be nice and along with that i would also like to know how the universe goes into edit mode by the creator of our simulation

  • @vinayaknavada4677
    @vinayaknavada4677 3 роки тому +618

    That professor is like "I don't need to iron my shirt , I need answers "😅

    • @virajkharat1515
      @virajkharat1515 2 роки тому +3

      I need to give answers 😂😂

    • @James-wd9ib
      @James-wd9ib 2 роки тому +4

      This must mean I am a scientist too

  • @amazinggreats5333
    @amazinggreats5333 2 роки тому +39

    So basically… gravity waves make space-time wiggle a bit and make giant lasers get darker slower when the gravity wave passes over the laser. Did I get that right?
    And you need to use one very low wavelength of light so that you can even detect the wiggle because on a higher wavelength, the light won’t interfere enough for it to be detected.
    Gosh, I feel like I’m operating on the edge of my IQ here hahaha

    • @janmamu8721
      @janmamu8721 Рік тому

      opposite wavelengths destroy each other, so when one of the lightwaves stretch they get more or less different, so more or less light survives so they can detect the difference by detecting the brightness of the resulting combined laser stream… probably

    • @Jason9637
      @Jason9637 11 місяців тому

      ​@@janmamu8721 The beam splitter actually puts the photons into a superposition (similar to the double slit experiment), and then each photon will interfere with its own waveform. Photons can't interfere with each other, only themselves.

    • @janmamu8721
      @janmamu8721 11 місяців тому

      @@Jason9637 thanks!

  • @xlynx9
    @xlynx9 Рік тому +3

    5:23 thank you @Veritasium for answering the question I came here for. And I love how Prof Rana Adhikari was tickled at you being the first journalist to ask interesting questions. The way you introduced him was so crazy and funny! Now I have another question, were you guys wearing sunnies to protect your eyes from possible laser leakage?

  • @Coco044
    @Coco044 3 роки тому +115

    The guy running that place knows so much about what hes doing its amazing. He found the perfect job (for him).

    • @rapianopenaldo1669
      @rapianopenaldo1669 2 роки тому +11

      Well he has a phD from MIT....need anything more to say?

    • @grealish2234
      @grealish2234 2 роки тому +2

      @@rapianopenaldo1669 haha your Name

  • @mike_dunno
    @mike_dunno 7 років тому +2544

    That guy's shirt has been affected by some gravitational waves

    • @TheDudecof
      @TheDudecof 6 років тому +96

      Reading your comment and laughing after watching such a complex and advanced explanation is kind of like the same feeling as walking into a warm room after hiking through the arctic for one hour

    • @TauCu
      @TauCu 6 років тому +4

      Stiggy Vandsrinskeen
      How? And why didn't they find anything?

    • @assootoshmotah2350
      @assootoshmotah2350 6 років тому +2

      Stiggy Vandsrinskeen Antropy is the problem my friend.

    • @nishant147vats
      @nishant147vats 6 років тому +3

      And there are those who throw candy away and cry why there is a printing mistake on its label.

    • @4amcuriosity162
      @4amcuriosity162 6 років тому +1

      Miika Mäentaus
      Maybe he lives inside a black hole

  • @andrewwalker3002
    @andrewwalker3002 Рік тому +1

    As usual fantastically interesting and very intelligent interview🙏🏼❗️

  • @brendanfan3245
    @brendanfan3245 Рік тому +1

    review it after 6 years, it still let me fell excited.

  • @jjuupa
    @jjuupa 7 років тому +848

    *video starts
    *doesn't understand anything
    *keeps watching
    *video ends
    **feels smart*

    • @Mp57navy
      @Mp57navy 7 років тому +14

      Hmm... what part didn't you understand? I'd go so far and say they explained it pretty idiot proof...

    • @jjuupa
      @jjuupa 7 років тому +48

      glad to know you're all smart to understand every single part of this video😊😊 Smart enough to leave a comment bragging about it

    • @diarmuidhurley3230
      @diarmuidhurley3230 7 років тому +1

      Mp57navy. Wow. .!A true Michael Brown

    • @vizthex
      @vizthex 7 років тому

      I've heard of that but not seen it.

    • @mrgomelonsolaris
      @mrgomelonsolaris 6 років тому

      but why show less?

  • @sbkaggle5961
    @sbkaggle5961 4 роки тому +837

    When you are a PhD student watching this amazing absurdly incredible accomplishment, and realizing that your simpler, and ultimately more useless research, has dumbass problems you have no idea how to solve.

    • @FFGG22E
      @FFGG22E 4 роки тому +18

      Its funny that so many smart people cant see how this makes no sense

    • @Green-pq2jk
      @Green-pq2jk 4 роки тому +64

      @@FFGG22E they might not be able to explain it all but just because it doesnt make sense for your little brain doesnt mean its wrong and I doubt you got a better theory

    • @user-mz7cn9hq8v
      @user-mz7cn9hq8v 4 роки тому +7

      Wtf is with self-creators here

    • @chappie3642
      @chappie3642 4 роки тому +90

      @@Videot99 it's a UA-cam comment, no one cares about punctuation

    • @adolf221
      @adolf221 3 роки тому +31

      Videot99 are you serious

  • @RiDankulous
    @RiDankulous Рік тому +1

    Rana Adhikari is an excellent communicator. It is remarkable this achievement was completed and the results accepted by the scientific community.

  • @aiden-b
    @aiden-b 2 роки тому

    My astronomy professor worked on this project. It was super cool to talk to her about.

  • @safir2241
    @safir2241 5 років тому +1900

    Aliens have this on their smartphones

  • @adamgillespie3393
    @adamgillespie3393 3 роки тому +80

    Imagine testing your lasers and then one of them bends weirdly and it turns out that they were affected by two colliding blackholes from over a billion years ago

  • @LD-qj2te
    @LD-qj2te 3 роки тому +5

    My mind is blown ! I would love to know how they compensated for everything and how things were toleranced

  • @kato_dsrdr
    @kato_dsrdr 2 місяці тому +1

    I'm just glad that there are people out there that are intelligent enough to figure this out.

  • @victoriaeads6126
    @victoriaeads6126 3 роки тому +114

    Prof. Rana Adhikari is SUPER AWESOME! He's obviously an expert in this field, and he's eminently capable of explaining his passion in a way that others who don't have his knowledge can more easily understand. That's a rare talent.
    Sir, I hope you teach undergraduates, because you are the sort who can REACH undergraduates and enthuse them about science and physics.

  • @leerowe280
    @leerowe280 4 роки тому +133

    The more science Professors I see the more I realize they are the BEST HUMANS AROUND

  • @LuisLopez2
    @LuisLopez2 Рік тому +2

    I have lived a few blocks away from that Caltech building for years and this is first time I get to see what's inside of it.

  • @YeloPartyHat
    @YeloPartyHat 2 роки тому +3

    That man is a good communicator... and in his job I would imagine rightfully so!

  • @WarringFighter
    @WarringFighter 5 років тому +1288

    i’m stereotyping, but he’s the type of brown dude, with glasses that has hit the highest levels of chill and great to hang around with

    • @namitanene3531
      @namitanene3531 4 роки тому +5

      😂😆😁

    • @fitnesspoint2006
      @fitnesspoint2006 4 роки тому +7

      here is a better video of your brown guy ua-cam.com/video/ViMnGgn87dg/v-deo.html

    • @burnttoast0425
      @burnttoast0425 4 роки тому +23

      not gonna lie, they got us in the first half.

    • @Anonymous37980
      @Anonymous37980 4 роки тому +4

      I'm sorry I put back the megawatt laser and stop vaporizing people please just stop showing up in the comment section

    • @ultimaxkom8728
      @ultimaxkom8728 4 роки тому +3

      @JOYJIT ROY k...?

  • @77gravity
    @77gravity 3 роки тому +679

    Stuff like this makes "rocket science" look extremely simple.

    • @jamesambrocio
      @jamesambrocio 2 роки тому +44

      @@charliebingaman571 exactly. A huge chunk of the technology we use in our daily lives were accidentally discovered/invented because of these 'useless' projects, as they say.

    • @yuritardid7761
      @yuritardid7761 2 роки тому +48

      @@charliebingaman571 Better than spending billions on war

    • @maxwellsequation4887
      @maxwellsequation4887 2 роки тому +2

      @@charliebingaman571 go back to your trash can

    • @maxwellsequation4887
      @maxwellsequation4887 2 роки тому +14

      Rocket science IS simple. Its like basic Physics. Anyone with a very basic knowledge of calculus can understand most of it. NASA is kinda lame.

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 2 роки тому

      @Mario Castillo THE ULTIMATE (AND CLEAR) MATHEMATICAL UNIFICATION (AND PROOF) REGARDING PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE IS NOW DEMONSTRATED, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA: TIME DILATION ultimately proves (ON BALANCE) that E=mc2 IS F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. (Importantly, balance and completeness go hand in hand.) The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. NOW, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of WHAT IS THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Indeed, ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. GREAT. Accordingly, INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mc2 IS F=ma. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=MC2 IS F=MA. GREAT !!! Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 is F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Consider THE MAN who is standing on what is THE EARTH/GROUND. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Great. MOREOVER, a given PLANET (including what is THE EARTH) then sweeps out equal areas in equal times consistent WITH/AS F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Objects (including WHAT IS the falling MAN) fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), as E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/energy is gravity. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. THE DOME of a PERSON'S EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. (Notice the flat AND black space of what is THE EYE.) The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The sky is blue, AND the Earth is blue. THE EARTH/ground AND THE SUN are E=mc2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS UNIVERSALLY PROVEN TO BE GRAVITY in what is a mathematically unified fashion. E=mc2 IS F=ma. The middle distance in/of/AS SPACE AND the full distance in/of/AS SPACE are NECESSARILY linked AND balanced. MAGNIFICENT !!!!!!!!!! INSTANTANEITY IS thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It is ALL CLEARLY proven. Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GREAT. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It is all CLEARLY proven !!!!!!!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. GREAT !!!!!!!! BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. By Frank DiMeglio

  • @TectonicBadger
    @TectonicBadger 3 роки тому

    I love this chill-ass scientist so much

  • @justiceitself
    @justiceitself 2 роки тому +1

    This is just amazing, thank you sooo much!

  • @danparish1344
    @danparish1344 5 років тому +886

    Don't you just love hearing smart people talk who are experts in the field?

    • @stevie7000yt
      @stevie7000yt 5 років тому +80

      Yeah, but also in cafes, classrooms, around kitchen tables, anywhere really. Doesn't have to be outdoors.

    • @OfMiceAndMegabytes
      @OfMiceAndMegabytes 5 років тому +3

      Yes, yes and yes!

    • @pvtmill3rr
      @pvtmill3rr 5 років тому +6

      gravity doesn't exist
      ua-cam.com/video/_HaLr9lztAI/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/uf-AkLoYS3A/v-deo.html

    • @jaytan531
      @jaytan531 5 років тому +9

      pvtmiller you do know density doesn’t dictate which direction the objects move right? And the fact that we’re moving downwards already proves gravity...

    • @smilernok
      @smilernok 5 років тому

      but where do you find videos , this is not one of them

  • @MN-sc9qs
    @MN-sc9qs 6 років тому +136

    The host asks great questions and the professor answers very well.

    • @dontomaso11
      @dontomaso11 5 років тому +3

      did they really or are u just racist maybe?

    • @panimbryk
      @panimbryk 5 років тому +15

      dontomaso11 are you kidding?

    • @WanderTheNomad
      @WanderTheNomad 5 років тому +5

      @@panimbryk I don't know if he's joking, but I think it's safe to say you don't need to take them seriously.

    • @sterlincharles8357
      @sterlincharles8357 5 років тому

      Marc, I agree with you. Very well explained. Lol especially if I could somewhat understand it.

    • @wingwang4342
      @wingwang4342 5 років тому +1

      I agree with Marc as well, I might be a little racist. Lol

  • @theexodeus
    @theexodeus 2 роки тому

    Very much agree with your sentiment at 8:11, absolutely fantastic that we’re peeling back reality beyond what should even be possible it’s crazy.

  • @FafliXx
    @FafliXx Рік тому +3

    To me it's even more impressive that we even knew to look for them.

  • @pantherowow77
    @pantherowow77 3 роки тому +600

    3:39 best nerd bromance moment ever.

  • @B3Band
    @B3Band 7 років тому +211

    What do you call a Fleshlight in Japan?
    6:38

    • @snowpeaky
      @snowpeaky 7 років тому +2

      Made me laugh!

    • @wowstefaniv
      @wowstefaniv 7 років тому +25

      it's fureshi raitu

    • @RyanRyzzo
      @RyanRyzzo 7 років тому +17

      Yuo of win Noberu puraizu.

    • @raiedr
      @raiedr 7 років тому +12

      Underrated comment

    • @joshua43214
      @joshua43214 7 років тому +2

      He even made an appropriate gesture :)

  • @aaronandannelogan
    @aaronandannelogan 2 роки тому

    The amount of precision involved here makes JWST look like child's play. Absolutely amazing.

  • @crustyoldfart
    @crustyoldfart 2 роки тому +2

    An Egyptian colleague of mine, many years ago used to recount apocryphal stories of the [ presumably mythical ] character Jo-Hah. In this particular story Jo-Hah has just been awarded a contract by the Caliph to teach a donkey to sing. If he fails he will be beheaded, if he succeeds he will be world-famous. His friends are appalled. One asks how much time do you have ? Answer 25 years. Jo-Hah explains : in that space of time many things could happen - the Caliph might die, the donkey might die ..... etc

  • @MauveAvenger7889
    @MauveAvenger7889 4 роки тому +1653

    A megawatt won't even rip your head off, it will just vaporise.
    So why are we bothering to wear these glasses?
    Because they look badass, that's why

    • @darklion13
      @darklion13 4 роки тому +49

      A direct contact will vaporise you, which isn't always the case

    • @cheemomugdoo6001
      @cheemomugdoo6001 4 роки тому +14

      The glasses do nothing!

    • @grenzviel4480
      @grenzviel4480 3 роки тому +151

      @@cheemomugdoo6001 I didn't want to be that guy, but actually, there is a chance that a small reflection of the laser could leak somewhere and hit your eyes. Such light would blind you instantly even if you can't actually see it.

    • @davemerit6433
      @davemerit6433 3 роки тому +29

      Sometimes your water tap accidentally gets a tiny leak. Its like a seat-belt for your eyes.

    • @intrepidmixedmedia7939
      @intrepidmixedmedia7939 3 роки тому +5

      ITs oNLy a MoDEl!

  • @WeeWeeJumbo
    @WeeWeeJumbo 7 років тому +184

    Prof Adhikari reminds me of all the best teachers and professors I ever had

  • @MAX-Breakdown
    @MAX-Breakdown 3 роки тому

    This ist the most chilled guy I've ever seen.

  • @RiDankulous
    @RiDankulous Рік тому +2

    I think something very important to acknowledge during explanation is that these gravitational waves are tiny *at this distance from the source*. They were not tiny near the source. They were huge at the source.

  • @TheHolosim
    @TheHolosim 5 років тому +61

    Thank you, Professor Adhikari, for finally answering this question that has been bugging me since high school. "What does a gravitational wave sound like?" It's now the ring-tone on my work cell. (6:12)

  • @MilesUmbrae
    @MilesUmbrae 7 років тому +87

    He's right; it's not alien civilization level of technology...
    ..it is just as simple as refining and perfecting technology we already have.

    • @kingjamestres
      @kingjamestres 7 років тому +1

      We didn't have this technology previously you weren't listening the professor said 20 years ago he would have thought this impossible. Its thoughts like yours that constantly limit scientific discovery.

    • @Architector_4
      @Architector_4 7 років тому

      +james d
      I dunno, maybe "eh, it's simple, lets just build that real quick" approach is a good thing, really...

    • @Outwardpd
      @Outwardpd 7 років тому +8

      It is impossible to attain 'alien civilization level of technology' as the moment we would ever reach such an instance people are immediately thinking 'oh the aliens might have something better', 'Oh you've learned how to reach 10% the speed of light? Aliens can go 99% of it', 'Oh you've reached light speed? Aliens have learned to manipulate wormholes', 'Oh you've learned how to manipulate wormholes? Aliens have learned how to create them'. It it is a never ending chase, today's technology is alien technology to people 100 years ago and the tech we'll have in 100 years would be alien tech to us.

    • @beaconrider
      @beaconrider 7 років тому +2

      And since we have never had contact with an alien race, wouldn't it be a trifle presumptive to discuss their scientific prowess?

    • @Outwardpd
      @Outwardpd 7 років тому +4

      beaconrider
      Alien technology isn't a reality it is a concept.

  • @darknez09240
    @darknez09240 Місяць тому

    this is crazy, the extreme of extreme conditions to even be able to detect the wave,respect to all the scientist that are doing experiments similar or related to LIGO

  • @KipIngram
    @KipIngram 2 місяці тому

    I LOVE what a straight face he kept when he told you the laser would just leave your neck a smoking stump. 🙂

  • @Gruggo
    @Gruggo 7 років тому +38

    This guys is so bad ass, that he doesn't even have to iron his shirt.

    • @Xakslied
      @Xakslied 7 років тому

      Grugg people still use irons? What is this? 19-fuckin-55

    • @Gruggo
      @Gruggo 7 років тому

      evidently not ;)

  • @jackwright2495
    @jackwright2495 7 років тому +157

    The physics here is straightforward and non-controversial; it's the astounding level of technical expertise required to actually make this measurement that blows my mind!

    • @johnjameson6751
      @johnjameson6751 7 років тому +10

      I kinda disagree with the first part. As Veritasium points out, naively the detector's should not work because the gravitational wave stretches both the light beam and the arms (how can you measure something stretch with a ruler that also stretches?). So this explanation, which is the one almost universally presented, is wrong. Rana Adhikari comes closer to a plausible explanation by suggesting the fact that the light is moving makes the difference. However, as the curvature of spacetime, gravity is more like acceleration (which is why objects are weightless in free fall), so a full explanation is more subtle still. The best science paper I have seen on this is "Gauge invariance and the detection of gravitational radiation" by David Garfinkle, but it requires some knowledge of general relativity (and the underlying mathematics) to understand it completely.

    • @Kalumbatsch
      @Kalumbatsch 7 років тому +6

      That's why you have to go beyond the woolly prose and analyze it quantitatively. There is no way around the mathematics.

    • @JesusIsaFlatEarther
      @JesusIsaFlatEarther 7 років тому +1

      Jack, you seem like a smart guy, so I have a question for you. What would you call the study of how water reacts? The physics of water? And if an ancient water level shows water isn't affected by gravity over any terrain or distance. And always shows flat and level. How has science shown that the surface of water could bend around a sphere to form our oceans? To the best of my knowledge, water must be contained to pool. Thanks

    • @jackwright2495
      @jackwright2495 7 років тому +9

      Water reacts to the bending of space by gravity like everything else: it only appears flat over short distances, but if you look at a globe it's obvious that the oceans are not flat at all, as they follow the net gravitational attraction to the earth's center along with everything else, including us - unless you think that Australians feel like they're upside-down all the time!

    • @alexlyster3459
      @alexlyster3459 7 років тому +6

      a) the study of how water reacts would come under chemisty, what I think you meant to say is the study of how water flows or moves etc... and that would be fluid dynamics. b) water is indeed effected by gravity, and so as Jack said, over short distances (and even over large distances relative to every day human scale) this appears to make water and other fluids form a flat surface. However gravity can only be considered a linear uniform field on these small scales, and once you get to larger scales you need to re-evalute how gravity works, because if you don't you would indeed see water (and people and buildings) falling "down" off of the planet. In reality the Earths gravitational field at any point doesn't pull you or water "down" as down is just a frame of reference. Instead the gravitational fields pull you towards the centre of the Earth. By which logic, when you consider large bodies of water, such as the Pacific, which bend around the curvature of the Earth you can't consider gravity to be working on the entire ocean in one direction, but working on it individually at each point to pull it towards the centre. That said, in a way the water is still filling up a "pool" as you put it, but instead of the surface having to be flat, the surface is at a "level of equal potential". It's easier to explain with diagrams really.

  • @antoniomaglione4101
    @antoniomaglione4101 3 роки тому

    Truly great explanation, Thanks!

  • @ethervagabond
    @ethervagabond 2 роки тому +2

    "Now here's something most people don't think about, which is that gravitational waves stretch space-time."
    That's an understatement if I ever heard one. Most people don't even think about gravitational waves OR space-time at all.

  • @JuuRokuChan
    @JuuRokuChan 3 роки тому +57

    I used to live in Louisiana, and im so glad my physics teacher in high school made a visit to LIGO Livingston a 50 point extra credit project. It wa really cool to be able to visit a place that made this kind of measurement.

    • @tpm2637
      @tpm2637 2 роки тому +2

      I live in Livingston. I was supposed to go on a field trip years ago, but it got canceled. Sad I never got to go.

    • @JuuRokuChan
      @JuuRokuChan 2 роки тому +2

      @@tpm2637 rip ;_;

  • @johnpaul.hello.
    @johnpaul.hello. 5 років тому +100

    All I heard was, " ...we have lasers... they will vaporize your head off..."

  • @desklamp8591
    @desklamp8591 Рік тому +2

    “a megawatt will vaporize your head”
    props to the guy who tested that 🙏

  • @xj4m35x2
    @xj4m35x2 Рік тому

    This was my favorite veritasium.

  • @TheOnlyToblin
    @TheOnlyToblin 7 років тому +122

    That is a lot of money to throw at a theory. Impressive!

    • @DerFrischkopf
      @DerFrischkopf 7 років тому +13

      Totally Legit Gaming [TLEG] Thats science...

    • @BigRalphSmith
      @BigRalphSmith 7 років тому +55

      Which definition of the word "theory" are you using in your comment?

    • @CarrotSurvivor
      @CarrotSurvivor 7 років тому +25

      Totally Legit Gaming [TLEG] just so you know... there's something called germ theory .. it dates that diseases are spread by contact between humans where bacteria is passed around spreading disease ... but hey.. it's just sucking theory

    • @DerFrischkopf
      @DerFrischkopf 7 років тому +26

      Carrot Survivor Also theres a "theory of gravitation" which states that things tend to fall to the ground. pretty weird, huh?

    • @Dream0Asylum
      @Dream0Asylum 7 років тому +11

      Scientific theories are operating models that allow exceedingly accurate predictions of perceptible existence. We've been throwing money at this theory every time we've employed it - like in the construction of the vast GPS network.
      No, this is actually better than that. We threw a ton of money at FALSIFYING a theory we've come to rely on to operate our modern world.
      That's what's amazing about science. Illustrating what you took for granted yesterday, that's the foundation of all you know about any given phenomena, is false is your first duty. If every other human endeavor were so concerned with integrity and objectivity how much better off we'd be.

  • @jefferynelson
    @jefferynelson 5 років тому +162

    I'm a blue collar type. There must have been extremely skilled construction workers involved in building this. Glad this is happening in my lifetime.

    • @BuhnanaFone
      @BuhnanaFone 4 роки тому +25

      Usually these are assembled by engineers. The construction workers may have been involved in building the actual stretch of building with wiring. The actual pipe that has all the ingenuity requires precise measurements only engineers can build

    • @Lexender
      @Lexender 4 роки тому +13

      Like spacecraft (space ships, drones, etc) theres engineers who specialice in working with these massive structures that despite being kilometers Long have to be made with nanometric precision

    • @Videot99
      @Videot99 4 роки тому +1

      @Dr Deuteron One thing that has me scratching my head a bit is that at 2.5 miles long the curvature of the earth will cause a drop of something over 40 inches. How do they get the laser beam to bend around that? Or is the tube elevated as it goes?

    • @semperfipar1299
      @semperfipar1299 3 роки тому +1

      @@Videot99 It should have you scratching your head because it is theory(blackholes) piled on top of theory(two blackholes) piled on top of theory(two blackholes colliding) and this place is measuring the theory. What he has really created is a scientific BS meter.

    • @Darfaultner
      @Darfaultner 3 роки тому +4

      @@semperfipar1299 You might want to go and check the difference between a hypothesis and a theory and stop embarrassing yourself.

  • @ydong7384
    @ydong7384 2 роки тому

    Really like your video! Very interesting and trigger people to think. This is the essence of the scientific tutorial and

  • @jerryoconnor9133
    @jerryoconnor9133 3 роки тому +4

    Can't wait to look back at this engineering in 20-30 years and see where we've gone