Stackelberg Duopoly Model in Hindi

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 137

  • @manoj99208
    @manoj99208 Рік тому +1

    Thanku so much sir ! youtube pe asia koi nahi padata jise apne padaya!!!!! Thanku again!!!?

  • @ammarakhan7792
    @ammarakhan7792 3 роки тому +10

    I am pursuing MA(economics) and I wanted videos for my study preparation and I randomly found your videos. Your way of explanation is very best sir. Your explanation help me a lot. Bht bht Jazakallah sir.

  • @naziaajabajab2015
    @naziaajabajab2015 Рік тому +1

    Sir your way of teaching is so amazing and explain each and every concept. May Allah gives you health, wealth and prosper life. Ameen

  • @PoojaSahu-vw4jw
    @PoojaSahu-vw4jw 5 років тому +1

    Thank you sir for providing this video , mujhe bahut hi jaroorat thi is video ki............ Onc again sir thanks for बेहतरीन explaination ................ 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

  • @kanchanbagri9971
    @kanchanbagri9971 4 роки тому +1

    sir apki explaination bhot achi hai ..... very very good work sir ... it helped me a lot ...

  • @debendraho5796
    @debendraho5796 Рік тому +1

    Thank u sir for well explanation stay healthy and happiness ..

  • @rishitabhaduri7878
    @rishitabhaduri7878 3 роки тому +3

    This answer is for Lokesh...the basic difference between a cournot model and a stakelberg model is that in counot model all the firms take their pricing and output decisions simultaneously. However in stakelberg model the prudent or the sophisticated duopolist is capable enough to determine the reaction curve of its rival firms and by the virtue of which he can max his profits.(first movers advantage)

  • @rinkyyadav8918
    @rinkyyadav8918 Рік тому +2

    Love u sir.......❤
    Amazing ...... love the way u teach....

  • @kainatjavaid130
    @kainatjavaid130 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks alot Sir for all your efforts for us
    I secured my 1st position in 1st & 2nd smester in Masters by the help of your stunning way of explaining every topic
    BZU Multan

  • @hafizaiman6138
    @hafizaiman6138 3 роки тому +1

    Thank u sir...may you live long

  • @poonamyadav-kg4ky
    @poonamyadav-kg4ky 5 років тому +3

    Thanku sir. Isi trah puri economics pdha dijiye..

    • @DrNavedClasses
      @DrNavedClasses  5 років тому +1

      Thanks Ms. Poonam. You can find some of the videos by clicking on the below link:
      ua-cam.com/channels/NZMrFuHVmpoW7zcITrN87Q.htmlvideos

  • @RahulSharma-xr5kt
    @RahulSharma-xr5kt 2 роки тому +2

    very well explained sir worth watching

  • @TayyabaRafique-q7t
    @TayyabaRafique-q7t 7 місяців тому +1

    Osm teaching method, God bless u❤❤❤❤

  • @DishaGupta-yd5eu
    @DishaGupta-yd5eu 6 місяців тому +1

    Thank you so much sir for this wonderful explanation

  • @miliris6276
    @miliris6276 2 роки тому +2

    U are the best sir 🙏

  • @MrPux1
    @MrPux1 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much for your valuable videos It helped me a lot. God bless you sir.

  • @iqrabibi9022
    @iqrabibi9022 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much stay bless 😊

  • @mohammadzaid4100
    @mohammadzaid4100 4 роки тому +2

    Sir isme firm 1
    Firm 2 ka bhi production set karta hai kya

  • @aditidwivedi2419
    @aditidwivedi2419 2 роки тому

    Sir please aap ase hi videos bnate rahe they help us alot sir you are great in all ways ❤️

  • @easylearning4132
    @easylearning4132 5 років тому +1

    Very nice teaching and explanation

  • @pawanmeena9635
    @pawanmeena9635 5 років тому +7

    Hello. at 16:08, P = 100-Q however it has been taken in the equation as 100-Q1. How?

    • @hiteshdahiya9509
      @hiteshdahiya9509 4 роки тому

      I have doubt regarding same....pls help

    • @prachetachattopadhyay74
      @prachetachattopadhyay74 3 роки тому

      @@hiteshdahiya9509 same doubt

    • @gaganshekhar
      @gaganshekhar 3 роки тому +1

      Because, Firm 1 is price leader, and it is initially deciding its output without the presence of firm 2, so it will behave like monopolist, and there would be no difference between firm output and market output, so we can write that Q=Q¹

    • @economicsartha
      @economicsartha 2 роки тому +3

      Hello,Pawan Meena! You are absolutely right.Q= (Q1+Q2) and while determining Q1, reaction of follower firm must be included in demand function according to Stackelberg model.For clarification you may watch my channel on UA-cam- Economics Artha. Videos are, namely, Stackelberg model of Oligopoly and Stackelberg's Equilibrium

    • @LivingEconomics
      @LivingEconomics 2 роки тому

      Yes this is wrong explanation. He should have taken the reaction of firm 2 while deciding the output and therefore revenue.

  • @debasishrajbehera
    @debasishrajbehera 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you Sir.Nice explanation Sir.😊🙏🏽.

  • @hrishikeshneog
    @hrishikeshneog 4 роки тому +1

    very good analysis

  • @sidrabintibashir8616
    @sidrabintibashir8616 3 роки тому

    Thanks too much .....nice teaching love it.... stay blessed

  • @nidhimishra7355
    @nidhimishra7355 4 роки тому +1

    Thankyou so much sir u r the best 😊😊😊😊😊🙏🙏🙏🙏huge respect ❤️

  • @mdshamshad1351
    @mdshamshad1351 5 років тому +3

    Well explained sir
    Thank you 😊

    • @DrNavedClasses
      @DrNavedClasses  5 років тому

      Thanks Shamshad
      ua-cam.com/channels/NZMrFuHVmpoW7zcITrN87Q.htmlvideos

    • @mdshamshad1351
      @mdshamshad1351 5 років тому

      @@DrNavedClasses sir make a video on Hick's Revision Theory of Demand. Thanks a lot sir

  • @kavyajha3519
    @kavyajha3519 Рік тому

    Sir you are awesome💫

  • @shafiqhussain5706
    @shafiqhussain5706 4 роки тому

    a very good way of explaining things

  • @rubynaved87
    @rubynaved87 5 років тому +1

    Bohot achche sir, mazahi agya😊😊😊

  • @RTknowledge-g1l
    @RTknowledge-g1l Рік тому +1

    Thanku sir 😊🙏

  • @varshagupta7256
    @varshagupta7256 Рік тому

    Your videos are very helpful for my net preparation thanks a lot sir 🙏 😊
    Sir ish theory me hume ek point samjh me nhi aya jo apne demand function P = 100 -Q liya kis base pr liya gya hai

  • @ashirkhan1208
    @ashirkhan1208 Рік тому +1

    Very good sir, please upload all the topics of first semester of master level because only you can understand them. Am from islamia university of bahawalpur

  • @E4ECO
    @E4ECO Рік тому +1

    Great❤️

  • @jkd.1401
    @jkd.1401 4 роки тому +2

    Sir criticisms bhi sath me hi explain kijye Plz

  • @ksskss2409
    @ksskss2409 4 роки тому +2

    Nice explanation sir
    Please give further simplification of derivative

  • @d.u.farooque786
    @d.u.farooque786 5 років тому +2

    Helpful sir

  • @shauryakashyap6637
    @shauryakashyap6637 3 роки тому +2

    Sir aap please growth model pe v apna video share kre... Specially technical change , embodied nd disembodied technical change pe.

  • @AV98520
    @AV98520 3 роки тому +2

    Sir econometrics bhi padha de plz.

  • @priyankakanojiya5208
    @priyankakanojiya5208 4 роки тому

    Nice video sir good explanation 👌👌👌

  • @sibanarayanmishra2345
    @sibanarayanmishra2345 4 роки тому +1

    It's clear now..

  • @lokesh7736
    @lokesh7736 4 роки тому +3

    Cournot vaale model m b to sir pahle ek firm n supply ki thi phir doosri firm aayi thi,,, difference kya hua

    • @economicsartha
      @economicsartha 2 роки тому +1

      You are right.You can get your answer on my channel "Economics Artha" on UA-cam.There you can see all my videos on oligopoly (atleast 10 in numbers).In this case you tuber did not included reaction of the follower firm while determining the value of Q1. At the same time, applied marginal cost function of Cournot's(MC=0).So, the result is as of Cournot's.

  • @brindabantripathy1371
    @brindabantripathy1371 Рік тому

    Sir is stackelberg duopoly model and quantity leadership model are same

  • @raginipal5827
    @raginipal5827 3 роки тому

    Sir u r too good.

  • @Businesssouled
    @Businesssouled 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much sir 🤗🤗

  • @deepapal8904
    @deepapal8904 3 роки тому

    Thank you sir 💓💓💓💓💓

  • @ankursodani7645
    @ankursodani7645 3 роки тому +1

    Sir is there is a universal law that output of firm 1 is twice of firm 2 in this model

    • @DrNavedClasses
      @DrNavedClasses  3 роки тому +1

      No there is no universal law of suchs type.

    • @ankursodani7645
      @ankursodani7645 3 роки тому

      Sir one more request to you if possible please make one play list specially dedicated for MA Economics so that I saves our time to find suitable lectures because yours lecture and lecture of Ez Classes help me and my friends a lot

    • @economicsartha
      @economicsartha 2 роки тому +1

      Here you tuber was teaching Stackelberg's model but he solved the problem according to Cournot's model .So, the result is as of Cournot's.He did not included the reaction of the follower firm while determining the value of Q1 which was required in the case of Stackelberg's equilibrium.You can see my channel " Economics Artha" for clarity where about 10 videos are available on oligopoly.

  • @kamalprabhakar6055
    @kamalprabhakar6055 5 років тому +1

    thanks by heart sir ji.

  • @narabbas8733
    @narabbas8733 4 роки тому +1

    Sir model ka sth likh dia krn kb present hua r kis ne kia

  • @MdMusabalamECB
    @MdMusabalamECB 2 роки тому

    Sir, is the market of cold drink is an example of monopolistic competition please sir give your argument

  • @prachetachattopadhyay74
    @prachetachattopadhyay74 3 роки тому +1

    why are we not considering q2 while calculating revenue for firm 1?

    • @economicsartha
      @economicsartha 2 роки тому +1

      Without including q2 ,the explanation and conclusion has no meaning.You may find it on my channel on UA-cam namely ''Economics Artha'' where two videos are available on this model- Stackelberg model of oligopoly and Stackelberg's Equilibrium.

    • @pankajbisht2587
      @pankajbisht2587 2 роки тому

      As Q1 assuming Firm 1 leader is independent on output of Firm 2. Firm 2 will react once Firm 1 Q1 is established. So Firm1 will be Proactive as being leader and Firm 2 will be Reactive

  • @sillygirlaarya7119
    @sillygirlaarya7119 3 роки тому

    👍👍 gud explanation keep it up

  • @priyankatheartist8643
    @priyankatheartist8643 5 років тому +1

    awesome sir

  • @KRISHNAYADAV-qu5ms
    @KRISHNAYADAV-qu5ms 5 років тому

    Nice episode 👌 👌

  • @makarandkamble5244
    @makarandkamble5244 3 роки тому

    Thanks Sir 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼💐💐💐💐💐

  • @EconomicswithEcoGirl
    @EconomicswithEcoGirl 5 років тому +1

    Thank you sir🙏🙏🙏

  • @farazabbasi8224
    @farazabbasi8224 5 років тому +1

    Love you Sir G.

  • @ownthinking2868
    @ownthinking2868 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much sir

  • @learningineconomics
    @learningineconomics 2 роки тому +1

    Sir notes kese milega

  • @rohiniharidas
    @rohiniharidas 3 роки тому +1

    Sir, Can you help in solving some problems?. Will pay for the same.

    • @DrNavedClasses
      @DrNavedClasses  3 роки тому

      I can try dear without any payment. send your problems at mgtclasses2018@gmail.com

  • @geetagurung7832
    @geetagurung7832 4 роки тому +1

    Sir, profit maximize karna bi bhataena

  • @muhammmadsharif6876
    @muhammmadsharif6876 5 років тому +1

    Sir ye kaisa aa gia..p=100-(50+Q)
    Simpifly kaisa hova =50-Q kaisa aa gia

    • @DineshSharma-ox2vx
      @DineshSharma-ox2vx 5 років тому +3

      P=100-(50+Q)
      = 100 - 50 - Q
      = 50 - Q
      Its simple mathematical calculation....!

  • @srishtywashimkar5780
    @srishtywashimkar5780 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much very easily explained🙏。◕‿◕。

  • @jung_cook
    @jung_cook 4 роки тому +1

    sir you didn't reply my massage that do you give online classes if yes please i would like to join

    • @DrNavedClasses
      @DrNavedClasses  4 роки тому

      Dear Praveen I have not been engaging any online class. I am sorry brother.

  • @ownthinking2868
    @ownthinking2868 4 роки тому +1

    ماشاءاللہ

  • @narabbas8733
    @narabbas8733 4 роки тому +1

    Mcqs k hawly sw important point dia krn

  • @Shivam-st4kq
    @Shivam-st4kq 5 місяців тому

    Ty sir

  • @sshubamsanmotra
    @sshubamsanmotra 4 роки тому

    if both firm want to be follower then what happend

  • @kratikasoni6497
    @kratikasoni6497 3 роки тому

    per edgeworth model to stable equilibrium define hi nahin karta.....? then how both form can move for making collusive. 🙄

  • @ravianand151
    @ravianand151 5 років тому +1

    Sir MC =0 lene ke pichhe koi logic??

  • @shivindersinghjamwal1586
    @shivindersinghjamwal1586 2 роки тому

    ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

  • @neelamdhiman4509
    @neelamdhiman4509 4 роки тому

    ,👍🙏

  • @LivingEconomics
    @LivingEconomics 2 роки тому +1

    Sir I guess your explanation is incorrect

    • @DrNavedClasses
      @DrNavedClasses  2 роки тому

      Thanks for the comment. I request u to plz elaborate the issue.

    • @LivingEconomics
      @LivingEconomics 2 роки тому

      @@DrNavedClasses about the quantity in mathematical expression. You didn’t take reaction function of follower firm to set the quantity of a leader firm. That’s what how its shown in books.

  • @Kaur-mx2ox
    @Kaur-mx2ox 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you Sir 😊

  • @chamanlaldewangan6591
    @chamanlaldewangan6591 7 місяців тому +1

    Thanks sir

  • @kamalprabhakar6055
    @kamalprabhakar6055 5 років тому +1

    infinite thanks sir ji.

    • @DrNavedClasses
      @DrNavedClasses  5 років тому

      Lots of thanks Kamal
      ua-cam.com/channels/NZMrFuHVmpoW7zcITrN87Q.htmlvideos

  • @economics_hub.
    @economics_hub. 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much sir 😊

  • @seemathapa8068
    @seemathapa8068 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you sir

  • @priyankasharma-hm8sd
    @priyankasharma-hm8sd 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much sir

  • @comedycollection751
    @comedycollection751 3 роки тому +1

    thank you so much sir ,

  • @upscdreams4149
    @upscdreams4149 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you sir

  • @urmilasharma564
    @urmilasharma564 3 роки тому +1

    Thanku so much

  • @rinkisahu2806
    @rinkisahu2806 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much sir

  • @alexprince3406
    @alexprince3406 Рік тому

    Thank you sir🙏