Inb4 someone writes "BUT THERE'S SPEED RECORD OF OVER 300 Tbps!" Yes. That's a controlled environment data transmission (pretty sure it's not IP or even ethernet) performed with lab equipment, not available commercially. Not something you could browse internet on.
I know, right? They also had 3,5'' SSD's with 20 or 30TBs in capacity. Much faster to just take such drive with you rather to send it over 1 or 10gbit network
Well, yes and no :) For example, some would argue that deploying EVPN-VXLAN for basically 4 leaves and one layer of spines in between is overkill, and they'd be right. But here, in SCinet it's mostly about showing off that "yes, you can", even in a multivendor architecture
@@DCTekkie but I'm a 'lil bit confused, wasn't compatibility like this always common? Even like 20 years ago people wouldn't use same vendors for routers.
It depends. Even basic stuff like MTU can be understood differently in config depending on a vendor, sometimes 9000 != 9000. Now, you have EVPN/VXLAN which is few techs stacked on top of each other, implemented independently by each company. It turns out that one vendor can process BGP updates a bit differently. For edge routers doing eBGP, sure, you can have different vendors, but you're using mostly standard BGP. But here this network does interesting things within iBGP.
@@DCTekkie Interesting. How did you learn network OS's if I may ask? I only have a paper understanding of them and would like to learn more about vendors like Arista, Cisco, or juniper
@@hariranormal5584 You can get Arista vEOS for free from their website and launch it within GNS3. Cisco and Juniper I dealt with either at work or at uni. The rest was new to me when i started doing SCinet
Inb4 someone writes "BUT THERE'S SPEED RECORD OF OVER 300 Tbps!" Yes. That's a controlled environment data transmission (pretty sure it's not IP or even ethernet) performed with lab equipment, not available commercially. Not something you could browse internet on.
I love how he said "Supposedly confidential" and proceeded to show the "confidential" stuff
Disrespect NDA's all day everyday 😂
nice to see it has built in USB-C on internal SSD at 1:25. really makes life easier.
I know, right? They also had 3,5'' SSD's with 20 or 30TBs in capacity. Much faster to just take such drive with you rather to send it over 1 or 10gbit network
Wow 30TBs per SSD? That's crazy. Still can't believe the storage technology is improving this rapidly
Loved it! I could watch you talk about anything. Keep up the good work
Thank you! I really appreciate the support and I'm glad you enjoyed the video. It means a lot to me!
Incredible job! So neat!
Great video and explaination
This is amazing, how in the world does this only have a thousand views ??
Do I have news for you my friend, we've hit 2k views 😄
Rightfully so :D
Love your content! Keep it up!!
Hey, thanks for the encouragement!
I need to quickly share 16TB...
You'd be surprised how often that's the problem, sharing 16TiB over 1Gbit link takes around 40 hours :d
This is fascinating. Please do get into the details more.
Is there anything you'd like to hear more in particular? :)
nice to put a face to the voice.
you can't hear baldness or specs apparently.
it's the result of doing 100 sit-ups, 100 pushups, 100 squats, and a 6.2-mile (10-km) run every day for three years
So cool. What a complex network tho haha! Probably more so even than some small - medium scale datacenters :)
Well, yes and no :)
For example, some would argue that deploying EVPN-VXLAN for basically 4 leaves and one layer of spines in between is overkill, and they'd be right. But here, in SCinet it's mostly about showing off that "yes, you can", even in a multivendor architecture
@@DCTekkie
but I'm a 'lil bit confused, wasn't compatibility like this always common? Even like 20 years ago people wouldn't use same vendors for routers.
It depends. Even basic stuff like MTU can be understood differently in config depending on a vendor, sometimes 9000 != 9000. Now, you have EVPN/VXLAN which is few techs stacked on top of each other, implemented independently by each company. It turns out that one vendor can process BGP updates a bit differently.
For edge routers doing eBGP, sure, you can have different vendors, but you're using mostly standard BGP. But here this network does interesting things within iBGP.
@@DCTekkie
Interesting. How did you learn network OS's if I may ask? I only have a paper understanding of them and would like to learn more about vendors like Arista, Cisco, or juniper
@@hariranormal5584 You can get Arista vEOS for free from their website and launch it within GNS3. Cisco and Juniper I dealt with either at work or at uni. The rest was new to me when i started doing SCinet