How England Managed To Invade 90% Of The World

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,1 тис.

  • @pukekoprobably
    @pukekoprobably 2 роки тому +2153

    "Haha look at that big boat hope it's friendly" - 90% of the world

    • @FBI-Agent.
      @FBI-Agent. 2 роки тому +116

      "I hope it's friendly" last words after 30 ships open fire and bombard the land

    • @Automaton_unit
      @Automaton_unit 2 роки тому +33

      OPEN FIRE
      -people in the big boat

    • @Snipsnop260
      @Snipsnop260 2 роки тому +28

      And that's why Britain won't get good deals after Brexit haha

    • @ieatIegos
      @ieatIegos 2 роки тому +7

      “Haha look at that big boat hope it’s friendly” Famous Last Sentences.

    • @laffey6546
      @laffey6546 2 роки тому +6

      @@Snipsnop260 🤣

  • @paulluka2029
    @paulluka2029 2 роки тому +1041

    Someone once said if your country wasn't invaded by the British then it doesn't exist and turns out they are 90% correct 😂😂😂

    • @stevelowe2647
      @stevelowe2647 2 роки тому +28

      There has to be more than 220 countries though, so if only 22 haven't been invaded, it must be more like 93/94%

    • @tastyfalcon1788
      @tastyfalcon1788 2 роки тому +28

      @@stevelowe2647 There are 193 countries in the world today. At the height of the British empire, there were far less

    • @laurakastrup
      @laurakastrup 2 роки тому +21

      Jokes on you, we invaded the British (Dane)

    • @stevelowe2647
      @stevelowe2647 2 роки тому +34

      @@laurakastrup no, you invaded Anglo Saxons in pre-joined England, let alone Great Britain. And that was 1500 years ago. And it was mostly the Norse..

    • @maxdavis7722
      @maxdavis7722 2 роки тому +6

      @@stevelowe2647 eh, technically they did invade England after it formed. Not sure if that’s the same at all as the British empire.

  • @Myviewoftheworldful
    @Myviewoftheworldful 2 роки тому +363

    “Everyone’s a gangster until British ships arrive on your shore” - Ghandi

  • @ianmacfarlane1241
    @ianmacfarlane1241 2 роки тому +700

    Make your mind up - Britain and England aren't interchangeable terms.
    Prior to 1707 you're talking about England, whereas after 1707 it's Britain.

    • @sophiechatterton4386
      @sophiechatterton4386 2 роки тому +1

      England is still the powerhouse of britian

    • @stevenenglish3147
      @stevenenglish3147 2 роки тому +37

      Ian, I'm a Yank who's Mother was born in Oxford. I didn't know that. Thank you for educating me.

    • @ianmacfarlane1241
      @ianmacfarlane1241 2 роки тому +32

      @Steven English 1707 was the Act of Union where the Kingdom of Great Britain was formed.
      (Not yet Northern Ireland - the history of the English then the British in Ireland is far too complicated to go into here).
      That's why you'll have maybe heard about the Scottish independence movement - trying to end 300+ years of Union... hopefully.

    • @TheSpikeg76
      @TheSpikeg76 2 роки тому +22

      I know. England isn't an island either.

    • @jamesmichaels4979
      @jamesmichaels4979 2 роки тому +12

      England and Scotland both had colonies

  • @pangs3798
    @pangs3798 2 роки тому +122

    the fact that we even speak their language here in comment section proves how relevant they are.

    • @piyushjaiswal9283
      @piyushjaiswal9283 2 роки тому +1

      Irrelevant

    • @everyonesfavoritegin
      @everyonesfavoritegin 2 роки тому +4

      That's because the U.S founding fathers took the kings english as a fu to the crown

    • @adamc91
      @adamc91 Рік тому +2

      @@standown2080 keep saying it won’t make it true..

    • @ChrisCrossClash
      @ChrisCrossClash 7 місяців тому +2

      @@piyushjaiswal9283Jealous much? Love it 😂

    • @strbst2075
      @strbst2075 5 місяців тому

      @@everyonesfavoritegin that’s not how that happened. America has been working for Britain ever since

  • @daviel1005
    @daviel1005 Рік тому +169

    The biggest legacy for me is that English is the most widely spoken language in the world both in terms of absolute numbers and in the number of countries it is spoken in.

    • @Android18uk
      @Android18uk Рік тому +20

      But that's actually mainly due to the USA global influence rather than the UK.

    • @davehoward22
      @davehoward22 Рік тому +77

      @@Android18uk The English language was spread around the world long before the usa became a world influence

    • @Android18uk
      @Android18uk Рік тому +20

      @@davehoward22 ​ @dave h Yeah, it was obviously spread a lot by British colonalism originally but I believe this impact would have eventually faded had it not been for the global economic, cultural and political influence of the US. Just Hollywood movies alone had a massive impact on the spread of the English language across the globe.

    • @user-bs5qr5ie4s
      @user-bs5qr5ie4s Рік тому +23

      ​@@Android18uk not true
      England colonised a quarter of world population
      So even without America culture
      English will have still.been widely spoken

    • @Android18uk
      @Android18uk Рік тому +4

      @@user-bs5qr5ie4s Yes, it is true, but at the same time, many other European languages are widely spoken too, particularly French and Spanish. Also, the main language of the US could have been Dutch. But the fact that it did end up being English and it became the language of academia and Hollywood movies and a lot of music from the US, is pretty much why English is the lingua franca rather than another European language.

  • @437livin
    @437livin 2 роки тому +78

    They just had a really good Risk game goin’

    • @michaelkarlin3727
      @michaelkarlin3727 2 роки тому +1

      Yup

    • @mishham6388
      @mishham6388 2 роки тому +2

      I always take Australia in risk as an Aussie but it's also not a bad strategy haha

    • @jackkenny4194
      @jackkenny4194 2 роки тому

      @@mishham6388 i did that before as I had an alliance with my friend but then snuck up and destroyed his Asian control and lost him the game hehe

    • @mishham6388
      @mishham6388 2 роки тому

      @@jackkenny4194 cool story bro needed more ninjas

  • @davewave1982
    @davewave1982 2 роки тому +238

    Hey info graphics I would like to see a video explaining Why gunpowder was around for hundreds of years but why did it take so long for breach loaded weapons and cartridge fired bullets to be developed?

    • @kbrock9146
      @kbrock9146 2 роки тому

      Because it was created in China, and it was used by the Taoists as medicine and therefore looked at as a medical tool, not "Hmmm. What small handheld things should we create that will then use this to expel small projectiles towards whatever it's aimed at."

    • @mastersitorou8289
      @mastersitorou8289 2 роки тому +6

      This might be another cool episode.

    • @the_once-and-future_king.
      @the_once-and-future_king. 2 роки тому +18

      Purely down to not having precision engineering.

    • @wiseferret4745
      @wiseferret4745 2 роки тому +5

      Germany invented the first breech loaded gun, and Paris invented the first cartridge fired bullets. Both were invented between 1840 and 1850, which was a tumultuous time in the world with a lot of wars and battles being fought between countries all over the world, especially in Europe, and it is those wars that led to the assassination of Franz Ferdinand in 1914 and the beginning of WWI.

    • @joyboy6535
      @joyboy6535 2 роки тому +2

      knowledge cause people were inferior back in the days so they had to wait for human evolution to take place and produce such smart person that can develop it into a weapon. this pretty much standard for everything like we might find immortality within next 50-100yrs something we can’t atm due to limitations

  • @TMMNETWORK
    @TMMNETWORK 2 роки тому +65

    When ur in search of tea and conquer the world by accident

  • @sgtpepper6481
    @sgtpepper6481 Рік тому +32

    This episode claims British troops landed in India in 1858 as a result of the US War of Independence. In reality British troops had already been in India for at least 100 years by that date (including forces of the East India Company).1858 is the year Britain established the British Raj in India, ruling until Indian independence in 1947, just following WW2. Independence partially granted due to India's huge contribution to the allies during WW1 & WW2. It is from this era that the highly regarded Ghurka regiment was established consisting of Nepalese soldiers serving in the British army - and continues to this day.

    • @Sandi_shores_lands_fish
      @Sandi_shores_lands_fish Рік тому +1

      Oooh Ghurka Ghurka Mohammed jeehad

    • @ylberhoxha1353
      @ylberhoxha1353 Рік тому +2

      The video has so many incorrect information

    • @Sandi_shores_lands_fish
      @Sandi_shores_lands_fish Рік тому

      @@ylberhoxha1353 well i put a jihad on you

    • @rajanrairealty8979
      @rajanrairealty8979 10 місяців тому +1

      only aquater of india rest was indepednt princely states look it up also nepal etc afg bhtan sep indep

    • @xenomorph733
      @xenomorph733 8 місяців тому

      I was going to say the British empire gave up on the US rebellion because India was more important but they were there long before that

  • @stevengruber57
    @stevengruber57 2 роки тому +76

    British shipbuilders in the 17th and maybe 18th centuries may not have been the best, but by the 19th century they were far ahead of the rest of the world. British engineers generally in that period were world leading.

    • @fact-o-pedio4603
      @fact-o-pedio4603 Рік тому

      Does that have to with white race Brain power or just sheer coincidence that even Sudan could become as powerful as America one day if they worked hard ???

    • @filozof372
      @filozof372 Рік тому +3

      I think british navy was most powerful navy since like mid 17th century

    • @GyanTvAmit
      @GyanTvAmit 11 місяців тому +1

      british had looted money so no wonder

  • @johncrookes9119
    @johncrookes9119 Рік тому +32

    How can such an informative channel not understand Britain/UK/Engalnd/Wales etc...?

  • @WelshWing98
    @WelshWing98 2 роки тому +55

    Infographics: “We’re going to be talking about what happened between the 16th Century and 20th Century”
    Scottish, Welsh and Irish viewers: “Pack up and go home boys, we’re not getting a mention”

    • @Mute040404
      @Mute040404 2 роки тому +6

      Nowadays, some pretend the Empire had 'nothing to do with me guv'

    • @HonestMan112
      @HonestMan112 Рік тому +1

      @@Mute040404 They forget the darien scheme, scottish colonisation in carolina and many more projects

    • @AquarianAgeApostle
      @AquarianAgeApostle Рік тому +1

      Glasgow was even dubbed the second city of the empire by Queen Victoria. But do infographics care not to include? Nope

  • @Rizzlelid
    @Rizzlelid 2 роки тому +77

    Just a completely unforeseen coincidence that as soon as Scotland and England go on to create Britain it explodes in power. I dislike it when you use England and Britain as the same thing, overshadowing the many Welsh, Irish and Scottish lives lost in both world wars and our contributions to the empire. Like the British flag is literally just a combination of the Scottish and English flag.

    • @arryn786
      @arryn786 2 роки тому +3

      Why do you even care. Should be happy you’re being glossed over in this💀🥴.

    • @Rizzlelid
      @Rizzlelid 2 роки тому +19

      @@arryn786 it’s just objectively and fundamentally wrong to interchange the world Britain and England. Makes zero sense and completely disregards the English flag.

    • @arryn786
      @arryn786 2 роки тому +11

      @@Rizzlelid They’re American. Do you think they have the mental capacity to understand this? I hate to break it to you but wales isn’t really as known as England or even Scotland🤷‍♂️.

    • @epicdude999
      @epicdude999 2 роки тому +2

      Its just what americans do
      I've learned to live with it

    • @swnamii
      @swnamii Рік тому +3

      @@arryn786 I don’t disagree that Wales is less known, but for an information channel, you‘d think you‘d be less ignorant and be correct on your facts. Especially as something as obvious as referring to the correct name of said topic.

  • @bc10Comrade
    @bc10Comrade 2 роки тому +98

    Technically they didn't conquer 90% of the globe but they did attack 90% of countries

    • @viperplatinum3034
      @viperplatinum3034 2 роки тому +24

      He said that literally in the beginning of the video

    • @raymondpendergrass6772
      @raymondpendergrass6772 2 роки тому +15

      Invade. Not conquer

    • @nellemoor2192
      @nellemoor2192 2 роки тому +1

      @@raymondpendergrass6772 Right

    • @keysandcoffees9441
      @keysandcoffees9441 2 роки тому +9

      Video Title: “How England Managed To *Invade* 90% Of The World”
      First 12 Seconds Of Video Narration: “Britain was able to *invade* 90% of the countries around the world”
      This guy: TeChNiCaLlY tHeY dIdN’t *CoNqUeR!!!!!!*
      🤨

    • @chattaboxxx2332
      @chattaboxxx2332 2 роки тому

      To be fair the one country they completely lost against was one of the least technologically advanced and smallest of all the countries they invaded. NZ.

  • @drnobody418
    @drnobody418 2 роки тому +70

    This channel always helps me to put the world into a time travel perspective.

  • @davemi00
    @davemi00 2 роки тому +35

    US Colonies were important mainly for our Huge White Pines.
    The trees were marked, Property of the King

    • @2000rayc
      @2000rayc 2 роки тому +1

      they made strong war ships

  • @liftusup9208
    @liftusup9208 2 роки тому +26

    Technically we are still living in English era if you look at grand scale of timeline. US and co. are new forms of this empire.

  • @markjohnston2780
    @markjohnston2780 2 роки тому +30

    The statement “the sun never sets on the British empire” is still true 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

    • @williamcastaneda8124
      @williamcastaneda8124 2 роки тому +13

      That’s coz we don’t get sun in the first place

    • @arranmorton3453
      @arranmorton3453 2 роки тому +14

      Now “the sun never shines on the British empire” is probably more accurate

    • @maxdavis7722
      @maxdavis7722 2 роки тому

      @@arranmorton3453 why? Overseas territories means that the statement is still accurate.

    • @2000rayc
      @2000rayc 2 роки тому

      and france

    • @jamesoakley4570
      @jamesoakley4570 2 роки тому +2

      @@maxdavis7722 how? if the sun never sets on the British Empire can we never get sun?

  • @iattacku2773
    @iattacku2773 2 роки тому +78

    Britain: “ my son it’s your time now”
    America: “ yes father”

    • @michaelhall7546
      @michaelhall7546 2 роки тому +5

      Who's daddy now cuz?

    • @GH29111
      @GH29111 2 роки тому +7

      @@michaelhall7546 Michael you’re the daddy now

    • @kirkmorrison6131
      @kirkmorrison6131 2 роки тому +13

      Except we see England as the Mother Country. " Yes, Mum"

    • @NarwahlGaming
      @NarwahlGaming 2 роки тому +6

      **bashes head with pan**
      "NOT THE MAMA!"

    • @rockking1168
      @rockking1168 2 роки тому +2

      @@NarwahlGaming 🤣🤣🤣

  • @TheFatmat5
    @TheFatmat5 2 роки тому +75

    Hi - Love the video but can we please break the common American tradition of using England, Great Britain, The United Kingdom etc interchangeably. Also FYI the flag used was only officially adopted between 1707 and 1801 - After 1801 we use the flag we still use today. Scotland, Wales, and Ireland all played a very important part in the British identity and history!

    • @bucknellsurveying6786
      @bucknellsurveying6786 2 роки тому +5

      Interesting video, shame flag wrong throughout 🇬🇧

    • @TY-sx3jb
      @TY-sx3jb 2 роки тому +4

      Also called the Netherlands “Holland”, bit of a shambles

    • @Rowlph8888
      @Rowlph8888 Рік тому +1

      Why being so pedantic.who cares about the interchangeability. Plus, the Union Jack is a mesmerising flag, so why not see as much of it as possible.The George Cross does not compare visually, for anyone except a Stubborn, cantankerous Englishman

    • @TheFatmat5
      @TheFatmat5 Рік тому +5

      @@Rowlph8888 Scots, Welshmen, and northern Irishmen often don’t like to be described as English that’s why. If anything it’s less about cantankerous Englishmen and more about acknowledging the other nations.
      I want the union to remain so that’s why I emphasise my point.
      Edit: Also I wanted them to put the correct flag (From 1801) rather than the union flag of 1707. Still the Union flag but updated. It's similar to me using the 13 colonies flag for the US as a whole.

    • @rizzonator987
      @rizzonator987 Рік тому +1

      @@Rowlph8888 because its factually wrong? If I called the USA texas it wouldn't exactly be right would it?

  • @SkyHighGaming88
    @SkyHighGaming88 2 роки тому +168

    Being a small island I always say GB had a sort of “ small man/country syndrome” and had to let every other country know they weren’t messing around

    • @HarryWessex
      @HarryWessex 2 роки тому +14

      Not rely as 5 out of 7 of our immediate neighbours were/are smaller.

    • @kylebanner788
      @kylebanner788 2 роки тому +1

      @@paulscala2907 that sounds like cope

    • @jedryan727
      @jedryan727 2 роки тому +5

      @@paulscala2907 God save the Queen!

    • @Dunlop1996
      @Dunlop1996 2 роки тому +1

      Ya pretty much spot on

    • @Ccccc-mi3tr
      @Ccccc-mi3tr 2 роки тому +3

      GB is not a country

  • @noahtylerpritchett2682
    @noahtylerpritchett2682 2 роки тому +22

    As a American I'm proud to have British ancestry.

    • @tulipalll
      @tulipalll 2 роки тому +10

      Same! British gang FTW!

    • @noahtylerpritchett2682
      @noahtylerpritchett2682 2 роки тому +4

      @@tulipalll RULE BRITANNIA!

    • @GyanTvAmit
      @GyanTvAmit 11 місяців тому +7

      😂this is not your fault your history teacher will not tell you dark truth

    • @noahtylerpritchett2682
      @noahtylerpritchett2682 11 місяців тому +1

      @@GyanTvAmit thats vague

    • @ethanmartell-md7xb
      @ethanmartell-md7xb 3 місяці тому +1

      @@GyanTvAmityeah I’m American but I believe I understand the annoyance of my fellow Americans saying they are something because of their heritage

  • @mrkermit2235
    @mrkermit2235 Рік тому +12

    Britain: “son you will do great things”
    America: “we sure will mother”

    • @Benjamin-ev7yv
      @Benjamin-ev7yv Рік тому +3

      Britain plays the Greece to Americas Rome

    • @johncane2304
      @johncane2304 11 місяців тому +1

      ​@@Benjamin-ev7yvancient China was a super power also during that period.

    • @Benjamin-ev7yv
      @Benjamin-ev7yv 11 місяців тому +1

      @@johncane2304 But the UK and USA are the inheritors of the Western Civilization, whereas China is in the East.

  • @doctorcrichton
    @doctorcrichton Рік тому +35

    And at the height of their power the British declared war on slavery. Made it illegal everywhere they went !! The first power in the world to be able to and make an attempt. As per usual most of the world followed suit... eventually.

    • @oyunboldboldbaatar5519
      @oyunboldboldbaatar5519 8 місяців тому +5

      They basically then proceeded to use Indian “servants” instead.

  • @Anglo_Saxon1
    @Anglo_Saxon1 2 роки тому +22

    There was also the settler colonies i.e North America, Australia,New Zealand which as well as being about making money, were also about putting down roots.

  • @vareckthehistoricaldemon196
    @vareckthehistoricaldemon196 2 роки тому +29

    Great video but at 14:46 you got the Ottoman flag and mughal empire flag mixed up

    • @ethanmartell-md7xb
      @ethanmartell-md7xb 3 місяці тому

      But if that’s the only inaccuracy you noticed then well you’re gonna need to start reading your history textbook again

  • @eternalthor4967
    @eternalthor4967 2 роки тому +22

    Between 1810s and 1880s was the heights of British power
    They directly ruled 20% of world population and indirectly ruled 4%(princely states of India)
    They had informal empire on 40-50% (like china)of the world
    No nation had ever came close to the British in controlling the most of the world
    Pretty impressive for that tiny island

    • @gabrielmartinelli2549
      @gabrielmartinelli2549 2 роки тому +2

      It’s height was actually in the 1920s

    • @krithigachandrasekar4591
      @krithigachandrasekar4591 2 роки тому +4

      I don't think impressive is the right word to use. I think somewhere the psychology behind all this is twisted

    • @gabrielmartinelli2549
      @gabrielmartinelli2549 2 роки тому +9

      @@krithigachandrasekar4591 Well I don’t think you’ve studied much history, because of any other civilisation had the same means to do what we did, they would have. It’s human psychology, not British psychology.

    • @archivesoffantasy5560
      @archivesoffantasy5560 Рік тому

      @@gabrielmartinelli2549You’re right but tbf he didn’t say it was exclusively British.

    • @aariyanmahmud301
      @aariyanmahmud301 Рік тому

      @@krithigachandrasekar4591 gotta give credit where it's due

  • @actonman7291
    @actonman7291 2 роки тому +33

    The Brits and the Iberic Peninsula Aka Portugal and Spain are the powers that shaped America.

    • @michaelhall7546
      @michaelhall7546 2 роки тому +5

      And now we shape them 😃

    • @GH29111
      @GH29111 2 роки тому +7

      @@michaelhall7546 how?

    • @caleb5257
      @caleb5257 2 роки тому +4

      @@GH29111 he’s American like me. Too much pride. That’s why the response was like that 😅 I apologize w

    • @caleb5257
      @caleb5257 2 роки тому

      That’s accurate. Having our own government and running of Britain for independence. An Spain and Cuba war we helped for property. Also taking over all of what is USA by killing and stealing land from both Indians and Mexicans. Writing it out makes us sound like awful people 😅 but hey!! All the countries was trying to gain power and land during this time.

    • @mmet0diev
      @mmet0diev 2 роки тому +1

      @@caleb5257 I respect your response more than the guy it is toward.

  • @teoengchin
    @teoengchin 2 роки тому +16

    The English were quite strategic. In many places they backed rival factions and helped them overthrow the existing rulers instead of going directly against them. Example: helping the 2nd in line to the throne get rid of the heir apparent. Back in the day, all governments were monarchies, and whenever there are monarchies, there are always competing claims and feuding noble houses

    • @Lukey111
      @Lukey111 2 роки тому +1

      Britain not England the two aren't interchangeable

    • @teoengchin
      @teoengchin 2 роки тому

      @@Lukey111 Most of the early colonization was done by England, before Britain was united. And the individuals involved were English, not Scottish or Welsh

    • @Lukey111
      @Lukey111 2 роки тому

      @@teoengchin your either trying to lies or very uneducated before britain was formed officially armies were still consisted of English archers and cavalry scottish infantry Welsh pikeman
      This is very well documented

    • @teoengchin
      @teoengchin 2 роки тому

      @@Lukey111Kingdom of Great Britain was formed in 1707. People were using muskets and flintlocks by then

    • @Lukey111
      @Lukey111 2 роки тому +1

      @@teoengchin that was the union of great Britain but as I have already stated the 3 nations had been on colonial expeditions together as early as the 1400s

  • @bassislandbannanas
    @bassislandbannanas 2 роки тому +8

    I swear it's like infographics has my world history lesson sometimes
    I just learned this yesterday

    • @gwho
      @gwho 2 роки тому

      history classes can be removed from school curricula and be replaced with youtube.

    • @bassislandbannanas
      @bassislandbannanas 2 роки тому

      @@gwho yes

  • @TheFightingRoo
    @TheFightingRoo 2 роки тому +30

    As an indigenous person I loved this for its education value. Although you could of saved a whole Doco & just said Piracy. I really do appreciate how you presented the information.

    • @paulwilson2651
      @paulwilson2651 Рік тому +1

      How is it educational when the poster doesn't know the difference between England and Britain?

    • @mimaza100
      @mimaza100 Рік тому

      ​@@paulwilson2651and who cares.. This island is irrelevant to rest of the world

    • @shinji1264
      @shinji1264 Рік тому +2

      Fail, it's because of engineering and clever tactics, you sound kinda bitter "piracy" lol that's a dumb and obvious answer.

    • @user-yq1tf2jh9j
      @user-yq1tf2jh9j 4 місяці тому

      ...indigenous to where? you do realise indigenous doesnt mean brown, right?

  • @yashdatir
    @yashdatir 2 роки тому +11

    Nepal and Bhutan were also not colonized by British, also in India there were princely states those were independent however were diplomatically with British, technically they were not occupied...

    • @piyushjaiswal9283
      @piyushjaiswal9283 2 роки тому

      @Jomon Francis not that the British defeated the Marathas. The sepoys of indo gangetic plains of up- Bihar won the other kingdoms for the British.

  • @kushaladaora9291
    @kushaladaora9291 2 роки тому +27

    Surprisingly, most of my fellow Filipinos do not know that the British Empire occupied Manila and Cavite for 2 years, from 1762 to 1764.
    The British was also responsible for Diego Silang's death after they promised him military assistance to support his revolt against Spain, which never happened. This also led to the death of Diego's wife, Gabriela Silang after she took the mantle of leadership after Diego's execution.
    The Brits invaded the Philippines after Spain decided to side with France during the Seven Years' War.

    • @XXXTENTAClON227
      @XXXTENTAClON227 2 роки тому +1

      It’s a small thing but the East India Company occupied Manila, not the British Empire. The British Empire left when they captured Spanish treasure, but the East India Company (which was separate to government and a “private” company) wanted their own compensation so they held Manila hostage until the British government kicked them out

  • @jenlin6715
    @jenlin6715 Рік тому +45

    After reading a book about the history of Britain ( David starkey) I learnt so much about the fabric of the country itself, it’s entire history before William the conquerer making the country run and influenced by many cultures who are good at invasion. One of the most influential were Norman’s who themselves came from vikings (sea gangsters). Along with strong rulers like Elizabeth 1st and navy it made the UK more powerful despite being an island. I have a love hate take on British empire but you have to give Britain it’s flowers for at one point owning so much of the world

    • @strategist7190
      @strategist7190 Рік тому +5

      The fact that we're an island actually made us stronger, we didn't need to have a huge army, (not saying we didn't have one) we just needed a huge navy

    • @Finix421
      @Finix421 Рік тому +1

      ​@@strategist7190Well you guys like dominated the sea for like almost 4 centuries(1600 up to early 1900)

    • @jovemgafanhoto4512
      @jovemgafanhoto4512 Рік тому

      Invaders and liars, without lies they would never beat the spanish empire.

    • @gordongekko3174
      @gordongekko3174 Рік тому

      its like saying, that the brits graped and the countries which got graped were asking for it

    • @wasp3959
      @wasp3959 Рік тому +1

      Mate the Normans were the French and the Danes were vikings.
      The Normans and the Vikings were 2 totally different people's and the two of them invaded England at the same time in 1066 due to a competing bid to rule England.

  • @skyler1887
    @skyler1887 2 роки тому +11

    "What a funny little island. I wonder what it used to do several years ago."

  • @1985donnelly
    @1985donnelly Рік тому +4

    England isn't an island, other countries are on this island.

  • @leicestergux
    @leicestergux 11 місяців тому +10

    Good old England 🇬🇧 what a place 😎😎💪💪❤️❤️

  • @Glicksman1
    @Glicksman1 2 роки тому +26

    Having the best navy by far for centuries may have had something to do with it, you think?

  • @ives3572
    @ives3572 2 роки тому +17

    "The story of the British empire helps to explain the roots of most British people: white, black, and Asian." - Sadiq Khan

  • @tristinkirby
    @tristinkirby 2 роки тому +57

    Thanks to our British chaps us rowdy, gun loving, freedom shouting, non tea tax paying colonists of the new Americas came to be. Thank you George Washington and the continental army.
    Much love for our British family from Texas

    • @bazzingabomb
      @bazzingabomb 2 роки тому +10

      love texas, thats proper america.

    • @a8-bit_gamer07
      @a8-bit_gamer07 2 роки тому +3

      So I’m pretty much your dad

    • @deanb6020
      @deanb6020 2 роки тому +2

      Texas is definitely the heart of America!

    • @gwho
      @gwho 2 роки тому +2

      @@bazzingabomb in terms of values and culture, but that land was very much mexico lol

  • @LUNE.44
    @LUNE.44 2 роки тому +95

    As a british person, my views on the empire are conflicted. Of course, the things that were done to the natives in these countries were horrible, and forcefully exploiting other nations' resources is wrong, but I do feel some pride to the fact that we had the biggest empire in history. I mean, come on, a tiny island in Europe managed to at one point control 25% of the land on Earth is absolutely mad

    • @tulipalll
      @tulipalll 2 роки тому +35

      Especially considering how few resources were at your disposal. Absolutely incredible.
      And now look. English is the most important language in the world.
      By the way, we here in America are very thankful for English law!
      No English law, no constitution. Hopefully we will tend to that torch and pass it on to another when our time comes.
      Also don't forget. The brits were exactly 0% worse than any other conquerors.
      For God's sake, ghengis khan killed so many people that it cooled the planet.

    • @Futurus_YT
      @Futurus_YT 2 роки тому +15

      As a British person I too am proud of the empire, due to britain bring so small.

    • @andersmortensen7415
      @andersmortensen7415 2 роки тому +3

      Lol dont you forget they were known for being wussies and actually still is😄

    • @pilothat2914
      @pilothat2914 2 роки тому +2

      Tiocfaidh ár lá

    • @Futurus_YT
      @Futurus_YT 2 роки тому +15

      @@andersmortensen7415 doesnt change rhe fact Britain had the largest empire ever

  • @jonathanwilliams9697
    @jonathanwilliams9697 2 роки тому +12

    It really isn't difficult to understand the difference between England, Britain and the UK. England - one of the four 'home nations' of the UK. Britain - The Island of Britain which is made up of three of the four 'home nations' - England, Scotland and Wales. The UK - All four 'home nations' - the entirety of the island of Britain and the remaining 'home nation' of Northern Ireland.

    • @wcg19891
      @wcg19891 Рік тому

      The problem is what term do you call a citizen of the UK? British? If so, how does that make sense with those in Northern Ireland?
      US has a similar issue.

    • @ihatealderney
      @ihatealderney Рік тому

      ​@@wcg19891For Northern Ireland it's complicated. For citizenship, people born there can literally choose whether they're Irish, British or both if at least one parent was either.

  • @anenehough5673
    @anenehough5673 2 роки тому +30

    I absolutely love your videos! Could You guys PLEASE, PLEASE!🙏 Make a video on the first and second Boer wars against Britain in South Africa... I would really Appreciate it.

  • @gailainsley6939
    @gailainsley6939 Рік тому +4

    Remember British when you are typing in English 😂🇬🇧

  • @stanielsoncoochiesmellehsm6114
    @stanielsoncoochiesmellehsm6114 2 роки тому +12

    "The sun never sets on the british empire" I think its still happening since the UK still has overseas territories

    • @RobertK1993
      @RobertK1993 2 роки тому

      In decli6many becoming independent.

    • @peterp4037
      @peterp4037 2 роки тому +3

      Fun part is it's a Spanish saying when they were an empire, the brits then took adopted it.

    • @macflod
      @macflod 2 роки тому +2

      The Irish said this is because God didn’t trust what they would do if they were in the dark

    • @maxdavis7722
      @maxdavis7722 2 роки тому

      @@macflod the Irish didn’t say that lol.

    • @rosslamb6643
      @rosslamb6643 2 роки тому

      @@maxdavis7722 Who cares anyway Ireland could be taken just like that lol.

  • @sensibleshinchan1019
    @sensibleshinchan1019 2 роки тому +5

    2 errors - 1) You kept showing the DRC as part of the British Empire, it was a Colony of Belgium
    2) Britain took over India due to a rebellion in 1857

  • @Stevie8654
    @Stevie8654 2 роки тому +4

    Greatest thing that ever happened. Spread civilization to most of the world.

  • @DontFearTheWolf666
    @DontFearTheWolf666 2 роки тому +4

    Other countries: We will go here
    Britain: MINE

  • @riomouris4767
    @riomouris4767 2 роки тому +15

    I always thought the answer to this question was "Ships, and more ships" "So many ships we run out of trees".

  • @chrishughes-adair1319
    @chrishughes-adair1319 2 роки тому +12

    Seemed to be phrased like the Americans abolished slavery. The abolition of slavery by Britain is one if the very few things any nation can claim as good.

    • @CIMAmotor
      @CIMAmotor Рік тому +1

      There were dozens of benefits to being a British colony.

  • @stephenlawrence9130
    @stephenlawrence9130 2 роки тому +34

    England🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 and Britain🇬🇧 are 2 different things, it's so annoying when Americans think that Brits and the English are the same thing🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇮🇪🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧

    • @Persac7
      @Persac7 2 роки тому +1

      What if he isnt american tho

    • @tulipalll
      @tulipalll 2 роки тому +1

      @@Persac7 I mean the speaker has an American accent.
      But I guess he may not be the one doing the research and writing.

    • @graham4943
      @graham4943 2 роки тому

      Ik as someone from Scotland and our history with England I hate that

    • @Englishsea24
      @Englishsea24 2 роки тому +1

      Well it's simply because amongst all the inhabitants of this island, everyone likes to blame the English for all the bad things of the empire, when even the Welsh were involved to some degree. Henry Morgan is one example

    • @RobertK1993
      @RobertK1993 2 роки тому +4

      Ireland🇮🇪 isn't and never has been British.

  • @CarlosAlbertoUrrutia
    @CarlosAlbertoUrrutia 2 роки тому +14

    Guatemala claims Belize, so it can be argued it was invaded as well. Or had territory taken from it, no real combat happened.

  • @dinonuggys6417
    @dinonuggys6417 2 роки тому +1

    I just tested positive for Covid and im planning to have a 5-day infographics binge

    • @nathanvorobyov2058
      @nathanvorobyov2058 2 роки тому

      If your having problems breathing already the best thing to do is lay down and just breath

  • @adamrichardadamdegoogle1944
    @adamrichardadamdegoogle1944 4 дні тому

    The whole world: *exists.*
    The British: “so anyway, I started blasting.”

  • @SIR_STuBz
    @SIR_STuBz 2 роки тому +7

    I feel that a meme thespiffingbrit had relates to this
    "3 Questions one must not ask"
    "A males weight"
    "A females age"
    "How did the British museum get those aritfacts And relics?"

    • @terryhayward7905
      @terryhayward7905 2 роки тому +1

      A lot of the artifacts in the museums were saved from destruction.
      For instance, the Elgin marbles were being smashed up as building material, as were a lot of statues from Egypt.
      It is still happening today.

  • @jermaineishmael7225
    @jermaineishmael7225 2 роки тому +14

    Really interesting video really insightfuI I would really want to see a detailed video into the psychology and the geology of Britain and British people which drove them to think this way as a Britsh Carribbean I really would want to know how it all came about from a mind set pov always amases me how such a small island controled so much of the world....

    • @andrewjones9690
      @andrewjones9690 2 роки тому

      same mindset that poisons our society today still. Private companies driven by greed, exploiting everyone for profit, governments let them get away with terrible acts with plausible deniability , so they could set up a colony, then tax the locals so they got a slice of profits and resources to further and fund its globalist agenda. in that regard not much has changed when it comes to big business/big pharma/ oil companies and banks.

    • @leicestergux
      @leicestergux 11 місяців тому

      Cos we are 💪💪💪😎😎😎❤️❤️❤️🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

  • @jonathang9983
    @jonathang9983 2 роки тому +5

    I am English by birth. England is part of Great Britain. You spring from England to Britain in the same paragraph. This will confuse some and upset others.

  • @Imirainy
    @Imirainy Рік тому +2

    What an amazing video! It helped me understand a lot of information and to connect it :D
    Kind regards!

  • @Phoenix-td9mj
    @Phoenix-td9mj 2 роки тому +36

    Hey @The Infographics Show Would the U.S. be able to sustain and survive if they got completely isolated from the rest of the world?

    • @mishham6388
      @mishham6388 2 роки тому +5

      Their own natural resources and crops. Also the Frenchies helped a bit haha this is why Australia never left the Commonwealth because we were always reliant on england for certain things we couldn't produce down under because of climate and soil conditions

    • @tulipalll
      @tulipalll 2 роки тому +4

      Yes, they would. Geopolitical strategist Peter zeihan talks about this. They would not exist as they do now, but they could survive.
      They have the largest contiguous piece of arable farmland in the world. The Midwest is insane from a food production standpoint. They can feed the entire country with surplus if allowed to do so.

    • @azules9780
      @azules9780 2 роки тому +2

      When I think about it, I can't see any reason that we couldn't. We're very blessed with natural resources of just about every kind plus we have the manufacturing and technological capability to sustain and continue progressing as well. Sure, we'd lose some things that we import but they aren't necessities, they're just bonuses to living here. Now if we were completely cut off, sure it'd be a rough 10 years as we struggled to rebuild industries that have long since left and find solutions for the few things that we don't naturally have but we do have the know how to do that with no issue. In some ways, I think it would be better if we went back to pre WW2.

    • @azules9780
      @azules9780 2 роки тому +1

      When I think about it, I can't see any reason that we couldn't. We're very blessed with natural resources of just about every kind plus we have the manufacturing and technological capability to sustain and continue progressing as well. Sure, we'd lose some things that we import but they aren't necessities, they're just bonuses to living here. Now if we were completely cut off, sure it'd be a rough 10 years as we struggled to rebuild industries that have long since left and find solutions for the few things that we don't naturally have but we do have the know how to do that with no issue. In some ways, I think it would be better if we went back to pre WW2.

    • @a8-bit_gamer07
      @a8-bit_gamer07 2 роки тому +1

      No, huge food shortage, but, the obesity stereotype may fade

  • @Amondera3210
    @Amondera3210 2 роки тому +41

    Let's be honest, there "were" Psychopaths on the loose. And that was profitable that's why they're great.
    Sincerely, Alex

  • @bogdancondicaru7848
    @bogdancondicaru7848 2 роки тому +14

    Was Romania, then split into 3 principalities(Transilvania -part of Habsburgic empire at some point, Wallachia and Moldavia-servient to ottoman empire, but not officially part of it) also invaded?
    If yes, I'm curious to learn about it

    • @ducadaniel7757
      @ducadaniel7757 2 роки тому +4

      I think the only time Britain soldiers invaded Romanian land was for a brief moment in WW2 when Romania was part of the Axis.

    • @bogdancondicaru7848
      @bogdancondicaru7848 2 роки тому

      @@ducadaniel7757 i was thinking the same🤔
      Any leads as to where should I start my research?
      Cheers

    • @eeeccc3562
      @eeeccc3562 2 роки тому +1

      No, we were not under British occupation.

    • @nicktk
      @nicktk 2 роки тому

      @@ducadaniel7757 not even then , 2 or 3 times aerial bombardment in WW2 doesnt count as occupation .. lel :)

  • @laffey6546
    @laffey6546 2 роки тому +3

    Tbh best county about what other small island can do what we do exactly

  • @robertb4000
    @robertb4000 Рік тому +1

    The British empire brings us into the modern era, this is how we have our own president/monarch

  • @wittymartin
    @wittymartin 2 роки тому +2

    This explains why commodities are today still traded on the London Stock Exchange.

  • @Sandyfaceroll
    @Sandyfaceroll Рік тому +19

    I think there is something to the genetic make up of the British people, at least the people in this time period. Thinking about the attributes of Celts, Romans, Saxons (et al) vikings and Normans. I know the Normans were basically Vikings too but they were different due to organisation, logistics and resource.
    So, in the genetic make up you could argue efficient empire building, seafaring exploration and warfare are well coded and possibly amplified by being an island nation.

    • @domonicmorris2448
      @domonicmorris2448 Рік тому

      No

    • @Sandyfaceroll
      @Sandyfaceroll Рік тому +17

      @@domonicmorris2448 wow. Stunning debate skills there. You've convinced me. 🤡

    • @Taureantiger888
      @Taureantiger888 Рік тому +2

      That's what I think it was too. They were stuck on an island and winter was coming so they went out to the world to secure resources. Survival of the fittest

    • @daquaviousbingleton9763
      @daquaviousbingleton9763 Рік тому

      No one has invaded england since so it’s still the same genetic makeup and that’s why I think there’s so much hooliganism and bad behaviour abroad from English people because now they can’t conquer everything they just act like they own it

    • @CIMAmotor
      @CIMAmotor Рік тому +1

      The British never had a Roman genetic make-up.

  • @Ranxerox1911A1
    @Ranxerox1911A1 2 роки тому +14

    Interesting how no one ever mentions who SOLD African humans to European humans. If a "commodity" isn't for sale, it is never purchased. Think about it.

    • @janabana7301
      @janabana7301 2 роки тому +1

      I don’t think it was mentioned because it’s not really relevant to the topic. The video is about how England conquered so much of the world and it was partly because they had access to humans that they could quite literally work to death. The act of buying enslaved people alone didn’t build England. It was how hard they worked them to gain maximum profits

    • @Jason-hg1pc
      @Jason-hg1pc 2 роки тому

      Interesting how no one ever mentions the "freedom-seekers" who denied their slaves marriage by choice but bred them believing their children were therefore a profit against the losses inflicted from working the parents to death. Pray about it.

    • @bigenglishmonkey
      @bigenglishmonkey 2 роки тому +1

      @@janabana7301 i think its more the fact that he said Europeans invaded parts of Africa for slaves when in fact by the time the invasions he was talking about happened Europeans had fully abolished slavery 30 to 50 years before

  • @BabyJayne395
    @BabyJayne395 2 роки тому +2

    Hey infographicshow, why is Ireland included as part of England in the thumbnail?

  • @OldBaldWookiee
    @OldBaldWookiee 11 місяців тому +1

    Rome - "im rome "
    Britain -"me too"
    United States - " me three"

  • @stevenjoy3537
    @stevenjoy3537 2 роки тому +5

    England has always looked to the sea, and that's why Charles De Gaulle said we had more in common with Australia than France

    • @Someone-mt7mp
      @Someone-mt7mp 2 роки тому +2

      I mean he’s right but that isn’t the reason why we are tighter with Aussies. The Aussie are cool, easy going and loyal whilst the French are arrogant, disloyal know it alls with an undeserved sense of entitlement.

    • @Installation04
      @Installation04 Рік тому +1

      Has more to do with a shared language and history.

  • @At1ksh
    @At1ksh Рік тому +2

    "The sun never set on the British Empire because even God could not trust the Englishmen in the dark." - Shashi Tharoor

  • @chillijoe8264
    @chillijoe8264 Рік тому +6

    it’s amazing when you take into account that England (not britain) is just a bit smaller than Alabama 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

    • @UltimatelyEverything
      @UltimatelyEverything 5 місяців тому

      England is Britain since England and Scotland are what make Britain

  • @shantatv3185
    @shantatv3185 Рік тому +9

    It's just insane that a tiny country ruled the world and still has power today.

    • @Deltaish
      @Deltaish Рік тому

      Tiny? i wouldn't say UK is tiny, Their land is pretty large and they still have some of their colonies like Gibraltar, Falklands and inhabitable islands as well as the British Overseas dominions and British Virgin Islands.

    • @User98272-ue
      @User98272-ue Рік тому

      @@Deltaishthey are tiny tho

    • @Deltaish
      @Deltaish Рік тому

      @@User98272-ue Yes but their overseas dominions or territories still have valuable resources to this day like Falkland Islands having oil.

  • @Benni777
    @Benni777 2 роки тому +14

    One of my favorite lines from Hamilton: “Why should a tiny island across the sea regulate the price of tea?”

    • @gwho
      @gwho 2 роки тому +1

      false framing.
      prices are set by market forces, and a certain concentration or geography may have outsized weight and say over it.
      or they're set by coercive power / monopoly, again, which isn't necessarily distributed evenly by geography or land size.

    • @Benni777
      @Benni777 2 роки тому +1

      @@gwho bro, it’s just a quote 😂😂

    • @sgtpepper6481
      @sgtpepper6481 Рік тому

      @@Benni777 Yes and of course it was the extortionate tax rates the UK was charging (to fund the conflicts with the French and Spanish). Turns out it was an error of judgement in hindsight...... I am a proud Brit and have been to the Battle of Bunker Hill monument in Boston.

  • @Y99992
    @Y99992 2 роки тому +7

    I guess you can say Britain has traveled the world faster than a shockwave.

  • @shreejankhanal_
    @shreejankhanal_ 2 роки тому +5

    No, Nepal was neither a British Colony nor a part of India at any time

    • @ryanjackson4004
      @ryanjackson4004 2 роки тому +1

      A youtube channel that doesn't know anything not a surprise at all

    • @piyushjaiswal9283
      @piyushjaiswal9283 2 роки тому

      Nepal has been part of Gupta Empire and maurya empire. Nepalis used to bow to bihari kings.

    • @shreejankhanal_
      @shreejankhanal_ 2 роки тому

      @@piyushjaiswal9283 It's okay, Nepalis are better and we know it. Don't need to spit false information just like this youtube channel. smh 🤣

  • @nathanseper8738
    @nathanseper8738 2 роки тому +25

    "If two fish are fighting in a river an Englishman must have passed by."

    • @paddington1670
      @paddington1670 2 роки тому +7

      If the fish are shooting each other it must be in the USA

    • @michaelhall7546
      @michaelhall7546 2 роки тому +2

      @@paddington1670 your cops carry sticks 🤣

    • @joshuadale7727
      @joshuadale7727 2 роки тому

      @@michaelhall7546 nope they carry taser guns pepper spray and of its reported someone has any sort of weapon we have lots of gun squads they are just normal police with guns. Thing is we don't need guns as often because it's not often someone else has a gun or even a knife big enough that a taser won't work

    • @nathanseper8738
      @nathanseper8738 2 роки тому +1

      @@paddington1670 Murica! Freedom!

    • @Finnbobjimbob
      @Finnbobjimbob 2 місяці тому

      @@michaelhall7546You say that like it’s a bad thing

  • @sfsoccerstar5
    @sfsoccerstar5 2 роки тому +2

    Britain, the number one provider of independence days

  • @samright4661
    @samright4661 2 роки тому +1

    The Sun never set on the British Empire

  • @WhoBetterThanKanyon
    @WhoBetterThanKanyon 2 роки тому +13

    Best navy at the time ⚓️

  • @macflod
    @macflod 2 роки тому +39

    Got to correct this as it confuses England and Britain-
    England does NOT equal Britain. They are not the same thing.
    Britain is the island that contains 3 nations.
    England is one of those nations.
    England is not an island, its part of an island.
    The UK is Britain plus a 4th nation on the island of Ireland called Northern Ireland. These 4 nations are united to form one country we call the UK.
    Confusing these terms is like calling the USA California or calling Asia China.

    • @lucabrasi3964
      @lucabrasi3964 2 роки тому +7

      Hate it when people refer to Britian as England

    • @jamesoakley4570
      @jamesoakley4570 2 роки тому +1

      it is a little confusing for foreigners but it's not that hard to understand. England is a country, Great Britain is just the name of the island England is part off.

    • @lucabrasi3964
      @lucabrasi3964 2 роки тому

      @@jamesoakley4570 it was Britian who created the empire not England. That's all you need to know

    • @lucabrasi3964
      @lucabrasi3964 2 роки тому +2

      @@jamesoakley4570 technically it is the island but when people say british or britian they mean the United kingdom same as when people say America they mean the U.S

    • @macflod
      @macflod 2 роки тому

      @@jamesoakley4570 yeah thats why i wanted to comment with the correction. This mistake is made a lot.

  • @irealhuman7001
    @irealhuman7001 2 роки тому +11

    Everyone invaded each other unconquered the British we're just really good at it

    • @tulipalll
      @tulipalll 2 роки тому +5

      Exactly 💯
      The brits were no worse than any other conquerer.
      On the contrary, they were the very best 😂☕🧐🇬🇧

    • @realdavidjones1623
      @realdavidjones1623 2 роки тому

      @@tulipalll That isnt a good thing to be proud of

    • @realdavidjones1623
      @realdavidjones1623 2 роки тому

      "everyone" is an exaggeration, also they conquered from a point of "I need this place so I take it", others didn't really need it as much I think

    • @tulipalll
      @tulipalll 2 роки тому

      @@realdavidjones1623 they could have done what ghengis Khan did and killed more people than Adolph and Stalin. So many that the planet cooled down.
      But they didn't. I would say that's better. 💯

    • @realdavidjones1623
      @realdavidjones1623 2 роки тому

      @@tulipalll still not a good thing

  • @treeman125
    @treeman125 Рік тому +2

    And that, friends, is why we spread our sports so effectively

  • @dylanmenzies3973
    @dylanmenzies3973 9 місяців тому +2

    The British navy under Elisabeth I was much smaller than the Spanish Amada. In part it succeeded because it was much better organised than the Spanish fleet, which suffered under consequences of Catholic dogma. This set the path for the future. Intelligence and independence.

  • @1wun1
    @1wun1 Рік тому +28

    By fighting other empires you've theoretically invaded the vassals, but these stats are inflated.

    • @jasoncornthwaite8387
      @jasoncornthwaite8387 Рік тому

      which means what? or helps our evolution , point is bollx

    • @1wun1
      @1wun1 Рік тому

      @@jasoncornthwaite8387 England never practically invaded 90% of the world.

    • @Superpooper-2020
      @Superpooper-2020 Рік тому

      Invading weak empires and capturing villages

    • @jasoncornthwaite8387
      @jasoncornthwaite8387 Рік тому +1

      @@1wun1 true i suppose ,,, sorry about my comment ,, very interesting point

    • @jasoncornthwaite8387
      @jasoncornthwaite8387 Рік тому

      @@Superpooper-2020 well thats just evolution ,, we did it and now get judged my you modern folk in life,, trail and error ,,, survival of the fittest ,,, ect ect , but we few english folk from a very very small island ??? lol

  • @matthewdelaney4078
    @matthewdelaney4078 2 роки тому +17

    Proud to be British 🇬🇧

    • @Snipsnop260
      @Snipsnop260 2 роки тому

      We should be ashamed. Like come on we saw what the Nazis did and what Putin is doing right now. You shouldn't be proud of the British Empire or else you're condoning all the genocides and enslavement that was done. I for one am not proud and could never be proud.

    • @LyonHeart888
      @LyonHeart888 2 роки тому +6

      @Jim Jam proud of global strong arm robbery? 🔥🤔🔥

    • @bh7090
      @bh7090 2 роки тому +4

      @@LyonHeart888 average modern child using modern standards to judge a historical nation

    • @Suncat770
      @Suncat770 2 роки тому +8

      u mean proud to be theif

    • @LyonHeart888
      @LyonHeart888 2 роки тому +2

      @@bh7090 no, I’m pretty sure it was recognized as strong arm robbery back then too… by the victimized and the victimizer. 🔥🤷🏾‍♂️🔥

  • @skozlozlaurie712
    @skozlozlaurie712 2 роки тому +5

    Nice to see you left us New Zealanders off the thumbnail.

  • @zacsayer1818
    @zacsayer1818 4 місяці тому +2

    If Earth was a strategy MMO, Britain won and the high score can never be beaten! 😂😂

  • @prajjwolbhattarai
    @prajjwolbhattarai Рік тому +1

    You missed out Nepal. No country ever invaded Nepal, whatsoever.

  • @ViceXXII
    @ViceXXII 2 роки тому +4

    I always forget that the queen is also the queen of canada until i hear it somewhere

    • @ChocoMilk.o_o
      @ChocoMilk.o_o 2 роки тому +2

      She is also the queen of austrailia

  • @Tijaxtolan
    @Tijaxtolan 2 роки тому +10

    “Britain has invaded 90% of the world”
    Me: *Like father like son*

  • @mayanksingh9392
    @mayanksingh9392 2 роки тому +23

    Never forget guys that the entire glory, influence, territory-control, power and might of the British Empire was destroyed by
    Prime Minister Anthony Eden in just 9 days.

    • @nikhilhadbe271
      @nikhilhadbe271 2 роки тому +7

      Good thing

    • @mayanksingh9392
      @mayanksingh9392 2 роки тому +3

      ​@@nikhilhadbe271 Do you even know Anthony Eden??? He was the Indian equivalent of P.M. Vishwanath Pratap Singh.

    • @maxdavis7722
      @maxdavis7722 2 роки тому

      What?

    • @mayanksingh9392
      @mayanksingh9392 2 роки тому +1

      @@maxdavis7722 Well, you see, Prime Minister Anthony Eden mislead the British Parliament in the 1956 Suez Crisis, thus ending United Kingdom's role as a superpower in the later half of the 20th Century and the rest of the Cold War period.

    • @maxdavis7722
      @maxdavis7722 2 роки тому +2

      @@mayanksingh9392 the UK wasn’t going to keep its power it had already committed to slowing self rule and disassembling the empire. The suez crisis only showed the facts that britain wasn’t a superpower anymore.

  • @HailTheApocalypse
    @HailTheApocalypse Рік тому +2

    With heavy metal music 🤘🤘

  • @kansaiben1573
    @kansaiben1573 Рік тому +2

    "England was an island"???
    Scotsman here - surely you know that Scotland is 1/3 of the British mainland?

  • @barrythomson899
    @barrythomson899 Рік тому +3

    England and Britain are not the same. They are not interchangeable. Many English people make the same mistake.

  • @dondamon4669
    @dondamon4669 Рік тому +4

    Britian was the little kid in school that everyone thought they could pick on , like the Leicester team that won the prem ,we are the ultimate underdog story that refused to be beaten.

  • @TheStickman419
    @TheStickman419 2 роки тому +8

    This video should be how England Scotland , Wales and Ireland invaded 90% the world.
    A lot of people tend to forget the role these other groups played in British colonization.
    The British did this, not just England alone

    • @poplops1
      @poplops1 2 роки тому +2

      That's Americans for you, they often think that England, Britain and the UK are interchangeable terms.

    • @poplops1
      @poplops1 2 роки тому +2

      @Critical Slayer The best British general, Arthur Wellesley, the Duke of Wellington, was Irish. He was even Prime Minister twice. The Irish definitely helped.

    • @paulohagan3309
      @paulohagan3309 2 роки тому +2

      @@poplops1 He was one of the Ascendency, a class of people who despised the Irish and called themselves British. He himself spent little time in Ireland and certainly did nothing for the place.

    • @Mute040404
      @Mute040404 2 роки тому

      @Critical Slayer Ireland was as much part of Britain as Wales & Scotland till 100 years ago. Something that is often overlooked

    • @Mute040404
      @Mute040404 2 роки тому

      @@paulohagan3309 The elites despised the working class, the world over.. The Duke was Irish born as was his father & grandfather, however this doesn't make him Irish? Mmm

  • @aconsideredopinion7529
    @aconsideredopinion7529 Рік тому +2

    It’s interesting to realize that the first British colony was Ireland in the 1600s (with the exception of the 13 colonies) it was also the first country to eject the British. While occupied Ireland provided up to 1/3 of the sailors of the royal navy and numerous famous ‘british’ generals were born in Ireland.
    Ireland gained its independence in 1921 and within 30 years of Ireland driving the British out and gaining independence the British empire disintegrated….🤔

    • @SeanBennettGuitar
      @SeanBennettGuitar Рік тому +3

      Lol let’s not pretend the Irish beat the English out of Ireland. Speaking as someone who is English with an Irish grandfather here. There’s also something called Northern Ireland. If the English really wanted Southern Ireland enough it would have happened - lets face it.

  • @AppalachianAnd
    @AppalachianAnd 2 роки тому +2

    Super serum tea. It's something the government wouldn't want you to know about

  • @shaunlink280
    @shaunlink280 2 роки тому +28

    *casually forgets the whole lost generation thing in australia*