BREAKING: New Phase of Matter

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 чер 2022
  • What are time crystals? How do scientists make one on a quantum computer.
    Click helixsleep.com/physicsgirl for up to $200 off your Helix Sleep mattress plus two free pillows! Free shipping within the US! #helixsleep
    Support Physics Girl videos → / physicsgirl
    Special thank you to our X-Ray tier patrons: Carlos Patricio, David Cichowski, Eddie Sabbah, Fabrice Eap, Gil Chesterton, Isabel Herstek, Margaux Lopez, Matt Kaminski, Michael Schneider, Patrick Olson, Vikram Bhat, Vincent Argiro, wc993219
    Stock footage provided by Beachfront, stockfootage, Videvo, JureKreft: downloaded from www.videvo.net
    Music provided by APM
    www.apmmusic.com/
    If you liked this video check out these:
    A picture of the beginning of the universe
    → www.youtube.com/watch?v=rut6f...
    Why is the Universe Flat? ft. Prof Alan Guth
    → www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTUsO...
    physicsgirl.org/
    / thephysicsgirl
    / thephysicsgirl
    / thephysicsgirl
    Creator/Host: Dianna Cowern
    Editor: Levi Butner
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6 тис.

  • @peterwroberts
    @peterwroberts 2 роки тому +2828

    You actually have to deal with quantum tunneling of electrons in the design of traditional computers because of the scale we're at these days 🤯

    • @thewealthand_health
      @thewealthand_health 2 роки тому +48

      Duh

    • @unclejuju12
      @unclejuju12 2 роки тому +198

      If you want look into "single atom transistors", its definitely a problem that they can hopefully solve lol. What a time to be alive

    • @allan710
      @allan710 2 роки тому +49

      I mean... Aren't transistors only possible because quantum tunneling is a thing?

    • @DJNiems
      @DJNiems 2 роки тому +129

      @@allan710 no, because they are semi-conductors.

    • @hugofontes5708
      @hugofontes5708 2 роки тому +120

      @@allan710 yeah, quantum computers are actually quantumer computers
      Edit for clarity:
      Because regular computers feature usually undesired quantum effects, while actual quantum computers do use quantum phenomena in order to work. That's the joke.

  • @christopherbillups7562
    @christopherbillups7562 4 місяці тому +16

    I hope she recovers. There are so many new discoveries for her to discover.

  • @patrickfrawley768
    @patrickfrawley768 Рік тому +328

    My son did his doctorate degree in physics studying crystals, studying the effects of radiation and lasers on crystals ( I think ) Unfortunately not long after he got his Doctorate degree he got Cancer and was gone within a year of being diagnosed . He was just 30 year old. All that studying , sometimes there no justice in this world.

    • @catwoman3247
      @catwoman3247 Рік тому +31

      Sending my condolences to you. ❤🙏❤🙏

    • @chance_waters
      @chance_waters Рік тому +76

      The learning and study wasn't a waste, it was his time spent and his purpose, what a great way to spend an unfairly short time, you must have been really proud of him

    • @shiruka2758
      @shiruka2758 Рік тому +19

      sorry for your loss hope youre well

    • @jchill2095
      @jchill2095 Рік тому +18

      having just lost my father I whole heartedly understand losing someone to cancer.

    • @siinxx7656
      @siinxx7656 Рік тому +34

      With all due respect and my upmost sincere condolences, might I add that it seems that could've been the other way around. It is said that when someone caring, brave and passionate goes down the road of their dreams they bring light to the world. Some people are so great that within archiving their own dreams they inspire others to join the rightful way, which is then they the ones bringing justice in an unjust world.

  • @jerichocruzado
    @jerichocruzado Рік тому +132

    If I had a professor like you in college that explained concepts to me like this I would have been far more engaged in physics. Sadly my university was just keeping tenured folk who had the brains and stacked resume but could not teach physics to a wider spectrum of learners

    • @starbattles1
      @starbattles1 Рік тому +3

      That's not what the professors are for these days. Best thing you can get from college is the value of research. That's your avenue to learning. Not someone telling you. It's you, finding it, the journey to find it, and the ability you gain to use critical thinking. When you research something, you truly learn it. Not just memorize what someone said.

    • @swadjo1149
      @swadjo1149 Рік тому +6

      @@starbattles1 so by that logic there should be no teachers ? Everything should be self taught?

    • @starbattles1
      @starbattles1 Рік тому

      @@swadjo1149 All college classes require research papers to graduate. No professor stands up there and gives the answers to memorize and repeat on a test. They give a lecture, then assign a research topic. They are there to assess and grade those research papers. To guide them in their research journey.
      You twist words and topics in your mind and it keeps your IQ very low.
      Are there no teachers in college? Yet ALL classes require research papers.
      At your IQ level you took what I said to mean no teachers. Very narrow minded short sighted, uninformed comment.

    • @noelanthony1204
      @noelanthony1204 Рік тому +1

      @@starbattles1 you can research on your own physics .. yes, professors are to guide students on a pathway that makes sense -- if they can't then why need a professor ? Salaries are big and they are to earn it through guiding their students with knowledge ..

    • @Pre-op8ut
      @Pre-op8ut 4 місяці тому

      ​@@swadjo1149privacy is what you lack yes hmmmm

  • @urbannanni5864
    @urbannanni5864 2 роки тому +376

    I'm in my late 60's and my college experience was 50 years ago. Thank you for explaining this in a manner that left me blankly staring only a time or 2. If I'd had someone like you around, I might not have needed to take chemistry three times to get my passing grade.

    • @JiggerzWithAttitude
      @JiggerzWithAttitude 2 роки тому

      I don't know why but I bet you're a pretty dope granny.

    • @VEE727
      @VEE727 2 роки тому +5

      You went to college when you were 15 or something?

    • @Hello-hello-hello456
      @Hello-hello-hello456 2 роки тому +2

      @@VEE727 no, probably 18 or something

    • @skie6282
      @skie6282 2 роки тому +8

      @@VEE727 apparently this is a bot comment, theres a few more exactly the same from different accounts.

    • @LadyCynthiana
      @LadyCynthiana 2 роки тому +2

      I appreciate your tenacity to stick with chemistry even though it was difficult for you! Too often we are discouraged from doing things we're not immediately good at.

  • @patrickhodson8715
    @patrickhodson8715 2 роки тому +2988

    Hey just wanted to say, the style of videos lately where it's like "explain a cool physics concept to someone who doesn't know about it" is a _really_ good idea and it works _really_ well and you should _definitely_ keep doing it! I feel like no one else in physics UA-cam really does that. Veritasium explains the thing to the audience directly, and Smarter Every Day condescends (edit: I just mean he brings the content to a layperson’s level) to learn along with the audience (both also work well for them) but you've got a good thing going here with your way of doing things

    • @trevorlybbert3640
      @trevorlybbert3640 2 роки тому +10

      Condecends to learn lololol. And I like that channel.

    • @chrisb8154
      @chrisb8154 2 роки тому +26

      What does "condescends to learn" mean? I like Smarter Every Day for the same reason I like Physics Girl...they are endlessly curious!

    • @patrickhodson8715
      @patrickhodson8715 2 роки тому +48

      @@chrisb8154 while he probably understands more than he initially lets on, he brings it down to an entry level any casual viewer can understand. From there, he learns right along with us, and shares what he’s learning. I meant “condescend” in a positive way

    • @RobertKreegier
      @RobertKreegier 2 роки тому +15

      Brady Haran (of Periodic Videos, Computerphile, Numberphile, etc.) makes videos with a similar format.

    • @patrickhodson8715
      @patrickhodson8715 2 роки тому +52

      @@Aethenthebored I meant definition 3 from www.dictionary.com/browse/condescend but maybe that meaning is falling out of usage. It must be, because the first two sites I checked didn’t have that meaning. Also it must be, because I obviously didn’t really convey what I meant to lol

  • @dennismokry258
    @dennismokry258 4 місяці тому +7

    Had a short reposted by one of Diane’s friends pop up on my feed yesterday and now today the algorithm gave me this vid which made me happy. Making this comment and adding a like in hopes it spawns an appearance on someone else’s feed to keep Physics Girl going strong while she recovers from her medical issues. Help me to keep it going in this little way.

  • @_Silly-Dad_
    @_Silly-Dad_ Рік тому +54

    Id consider myself an enthusiast of all things tech and science (if not a casual one), but I have to say I owe it to creators like you and your patience and willingness to explain concepts to normies like me!
    Thank you!

    • @Xxstephenx1x
      @Xxstephenx1x 9 місяців тому

      This 1000000% this. I feel the same way I love learning from creators like this..

  • @alicecuriosityoftenleadsto6288
    @alicecuriosityoftenleadsto6288 2 роки тому +401

    I really appreciate how she breaks it down without being condescending. Instead she assumes the person is intelligent while also asking the person questions to guage their level of understanding/knowledge of the principles underlying the subject shes describing.
    Well done.
    Also not over-explaining to the point where you get bored listening or lost, thats a talent

    • @liammahan4497
      @liammahan4497 Рік тому +6

      Honestly explains why I feel so engaged with the video

    • @amihere383
      @amihere383 Рік тому +3

      Exactly. She must have done some training, or is just incredibly talented, to break such complex ideas down so neatly. Einstein said if you can’t explain something to a six year old you don’t understand it yourself.

    • @BluRey100
      @BluRey100 Рік тому +1

      SHE IS BEING CONDESCENDING, IT'S JUST THAT SHE HERSELF IS CONVINCING HERSELF SHE HAS FOUND SOMETHING NEW, SHE HAS NOT, "TIME & SPACE" OR THE 4TH & 5TH DIMMENSION HAVE EXISTED SINCE THE BIG BANG. HOW DARE SHE TAKE THIS CREDIT? DID SHE WIN A NOBEL PRIZE? GET REAL, QUARTZ WATCHES HAVE BEEN USING CRYSTALS TO USE THIS ALLEGED "NEW" MATTTER WHICH IS TIME. DUH.

  • @iau
    @iau 2 роки тому +498

    My TL;DW: They used a quantum computer to put some electrons together in a configuration such that they flip together back and forth through time.
    The surprising part is that it doesn't seem to consume any energy and it's stable, so it can be called a state of matter. The electrons somehow "know" their previous state and they all flip together.
    They're called a crystal because it's a repeating structure, but through time instead of space in this case.

    • @justaskin8523
      @justaskin8523 2 роки тому +24

      I read about that, but I don't think it flipped back and forth "through time". If I recall correctly, both "ends" flipped at the same time without any lag/latency. And no energy consumption either, as you said.

    • @brainretardant
      @brainretardant 2 роки тому +10

      Look up intermediate axis theory

    • @QuantumEffectResidue
      @QuantumEffectResidue 2 роки тому +5

      It's so obvious that the Mandela / Quantum Effect was done using this method. I don't care what anyone says that wants to "argue" with me about it. It won't work; I'm convinced and I will always believe that.

    • @kevinpaap2890
      @kevinpaap2890 2 роки тому +7

      So it’s more like a ping-pong cycling of arrangements of information that the particles are holding onto, rather than the arrangement of particles of an object.
      Obviously the electrons are changing their arrangements, but this isn’t like a traditional phase you can “hold” is the point i’m getting at.

    • @brainretardant
      @brainretardant 2 роки тому

      @@kevinpaap2890 there are no electrons

  • @maryreynolds5310
    @maryreynolds5310 Рік тому +51

    Get well soon Physics Girl! I’m a new subscriber, and I’m so thrilled to have found you…I love this stuff! I can’t wait to learn even more. My prayers to you I send for sure..Thank you for what you do here, so much more, SO MUCH MORE I want to learn and the way you teach and explain everything, I actually get it! XO

  • @OCompton
    @OCompton Рік тому +11

    I remember hearing about this but i still got chills when you described some of the actions of time crystals and love your casual simplified explanation of a mind blowing experiment. Thank you

  • @justa.american8303
    @justa.american8303 2 роки тому +334

    Physics was one of my favorite subjects in high school. And that was because my teacher took the same teaching approach as you. He could take a complex issue and break it down to an understandable concept and put all the properties together in a understandable manner.
    You remind me of one of my favorite teachers who became a good friend. Keep inspiring us to think, especially out of the box.

    • @prdprdprdprdprdel
      @prdprdprdprdprdel 2 роки тому +2

      Same.. At first, we had a meh physics teacher and i genuinely thought i just don't like the subject. But all of my teachers after that were super enthusiastic and great at explaining in an easily digestible way and it became one of my favorite subjects all throughout high school and college.. A great teacher makes all the difference

    • @jeromeball859
      @jeromeball859 2 роки тому +4

      Buhl, Idaho... decades ago.... graduating class: 100... physics students: occasional. Me and one other kid. We sat in the back of chemistry class and worked through a physics curriculum, more or less. The teacher spent his personal time coming up with it, and keeping us going. The administration basically invented a class they didn't really offer and made it work. "Takes a village" kind of thing. We never appreciated it at the time. But it got me in a spin-up state that maintained through college and set the course of my life. Thanks, Charles Humphries.

  • @decrepitworld3634
    @decrepitworld3634 2 роки тому +289

    Physics Girl is always down to earth with her examples and illustrations. This really helps less scientifically exposed audiences relate to what she's trying to explain much better. Well done

    • @ougintoga7195
      @ougintoga7195 2 роки тому +3

      @Rosetta Stoned I don't really understand what makes this comment pretentious can you explain?

    • @decrepitworld3634
      @decrepitworld3634 2 роки тому +1

      @Rosetta Stoned - Yup! Love it!

    • @repentandbelieveinjesuschr9495
      @repentandbelieveinjesuschr9495 2 роки тому

      Repent to Jesus Christ
      “For I am the Lord your God who takes hold of your right hand and says to you, Do not fear; I will help you.”
      ‭‭Isaiah‬ ‭41:13‬ ‭NIV‬‬

    • @FireTurkey
      @FireTurkey 2 роки тому +2

      @@repentandbelieveinjesuschr9495 I just don't get how these bots pick videos.. I mean ignoring that this is a scientific video I honestly don't get why it'd pick this video.

  • @aserta
    @aserta Рік тому +64

    Going back to this video, i like this format and i think it's one of the cooler out there. Expert talking with a person that's neither completely unawares but not keyed in either. Any explanation is bound to hit solid points with everyone involved with watching the video.

  • @ljg6979
    @ljg6979 Рік тому +17

    I have discovered a process to make THYME crystals. Currently I am working on Rosemary crystals, and if successful, will move on to Parsley and Sage as well. I anticipate winning the Noble Prize for this complex work that will surely have great benefits for all human kind.

  • @salamanca1954
    @salamanca1954 2 роки тому +311

    Boy, do I love Physics Girl. Taking obscure and highly technical and/or mathematical concepts and rendering them understandable to a general audience is a gift, and the product of a lot of hard work. Respect.

    • @chefgiovanni
      @chefgiovanni 2 роки тому +7

      She wants me to cook for her. I would as long as she talked over wine and appetizers.

    • @phaseshifter3d455
      @phaseshifter3d455 2 роки тому +1

      I don't know what an integer is.

    • @BuddyLee23
      @BuddyLee23 2 роки тому +1

      The interviewer seemed surprisingly clueless however. She should have a 5th grader interview her to make it more understandable.

    • @salamanca1954
      @salamanca1954 2 роки тому +1

      @@BuddyLee23 I think it was her producer, not himself a scientist based on the available evidence.

    • @mikenewtonninja9379
      @mikenewtonninja9379 2 роки тому

      bruv, I heard your mum gifts her audiences with one on one interaction, and that she works to make things hard. I heard she does this kind of work by the bins in the bin alley between the shops on the main road, at night time. I also heard she likes animals too. and she welcomes cripples and spastics too.

  • @JoshuaGoudreau
    @JoshuaGoudreau 2 роки тому +129

    I love how in each of these explains videos Levi is getting a little more literate in science each time, it makes me feel like myself and how anyone can learn this stuff

    • @slevinchannel7589
      @slevinchannel7589 2 роки тому

      Conservatives are on a giant Anti-Trans-Campaign right-now.Professor Dave, Planarwalk and other Science-UA-camrs and Atheist-Channel try to oppose them, but oh wow, Fox-News, Shapiro, everyone is in-it.

  • @karkussthesupreme7343
    @karkussthesupreme7343 Рік тому +13

    Imagine a glass falling off the table and breaking. Now imagine the glass repairing itself.

    • @thealize808
      @thealize808 Рік тому +1

      No

    • @Jeff-zs2pq
      @Jeff-zs2pq 4 місяці тому

      The time crystal moving a few seconds back in time would look like a violation of the second law of thermodynamics because the glass would be "repaired" . But then it would oscillate forward in time a few seconds later and it would be broken.

  • @marksmith7997
    @marksmith7997 Рік тому +10

    I just want to say that I think it is really cool to see someone who is so excited about the subject as you are. I’m fascinated by physics but mostly I’m fascinated by the level of excitement you convey when talking about it.

  • @rogerionascimento9080
    @rogerionascimento9080 2 роки тому +312

    I'm not versed at all in any of the subjects but I am fascinated by science and having it explained in this manner put a huge smile on my face as I begin to understand how far we've come and where this can go.

    • @winstonsmith11
      @winstonsmith11 2 роки тому +6

      I love this comment. Apart from the word "manor". In this instance, you would use "manner" :)

    • @Exaspatial
      @Exaspatial 2 роки тому +4

      @@winstonsmith11 🤓

    • @dmz140
      @dmz140 2 роки тому

      I love this comment. I agree 100%. And I don’t care which manor she was in when she explained it.. @Winsten Smith.

    • @supermeteorite
      @supermeteorite 2 роки тому +1

      Well it’s a fake video with no sources so..

    • @nicnic1190
      @nicnic1190 2 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/29Tlzf8f1FQ/v-deo.html

  • @LookingGlassUniverse
    @LookingGlassUniverse 2 роки тому +2000

    This was so interesting and well explained! I love these videos where you just sit down and explain something to someone

    • @nedisawegoyogya
      @nedisawegoyogya 2 роки тому +3

      what about the entropy of the system? wouldn't the time crystal increase the photons' entropy from the laser?

    • @djtomleeuwen
      @djtomleeuwen 2 роки тому +6

      Love your explanations as well!

    • @revantair8497
      @revantair8497 2 роки тому +6

      Probably the best way to explain is, well, interaction. Puns probably intended.

    • @P-G-77
      @P-G-77 2 роки тому +4

      Difficult to say "well explain..." considering ALL. ... and difficult to say "New phase of matter...." very difficult at least.

    • @Danuxsy
      @Danuxsy 2 роки тому

      me after reading something on wikipedia be like:

  • @ronaldbaits9924
    @ronaldbaits9924 Рік тому +163

    Love this channel so much , I’m just a chef that spends his daily train commute thinking about string theory and the Big Bang / multiverse, you really help make physics understandable with the way you deliver the subject! Bravo

    • @Displ4c
      @Displ4c Рік тому +6

      Interesting man

    • @bidyo1365
      @bidyo1365 Рік тому +1

      wow nice, interesting!🧐

    • @jaysoncowan5763
      @jaysoncowan5763 Рік тому

      Big Bang? Didn't we prove that didn't happen yet? I wrote a paper in University that proved the Big Bang likely didn't happen and the big crunch will not happen for sure. I was later proven right and asked the professor to revise my grade since I got a C for being a crack pot and he told me to get stuffed. Just an analysis of superstructures of galaxies it is impossible for the Big Bang to be responsible for them.

    • @claireredfield6676
      @claireredfield6676 Рік тому +1

      We think alike.

    • @notsilentfalcon4773
      @notsilentfalcon4773 Рік тому +2

      What’s up chef It’s nice to see a fellow servant of the flame

  • @FitnessYogawithSarah
    @FitnessYogawithSarah Рік тому +11

    I am not a scientific nor into physics....but I love to collect crystals and learning new things. I really appreciate this video as I was able to understand and follow along. Thank you 😊

  • @MrWorth66
    @MrWorth66 2 роки тому +69

    the best part of your videos is how excited you are to talk about each subject, even if im not that interested myself, or know about it already, listening to your enthusiasm is fun and entertaining. I hope you never lose your enthusiasm for learning and educating

  • @tristanneal9552
    @tristanneal9552 Рік тому +374

    As a biologist, this makes me think of how peptides spontaneously fold into their tertiary protein structures without energy input, simply because the order of amino acid domains must do so according to their physical properties. I don't know if that's comparable to how the qbits managed to find their way back to the starting position, but it seems to me that time crystals somehow create a sort of schema within their closed system that includes time as one of its physical properties. It also makes me wonder if it would ever be possible to create a time crystal on the scale of a protein, because that would be amazing

    • @amihere383
      @amihere383 Рік тому +15

      That is incredible, and so fascinating! I need to know more 😭

    • @StfuFFS
      @StfuFFS Рік тому +21

      That's less of spin flipping and more of the weird phenomenon of nature occasionally (and irrationally) tending toward order rather than entropy when entropy is the path of least resistance.

    • @StfuFFS
      @StfuFFS Рік тому +6

      But spin up or down are the same magnitude vector but with an opposite direction.

    • @troy510
      @troy510 Рік тому +14

      That is an amazing thought. I always wondered what decided or designed what life decides to be or what tells it to be that thing. Would that mean you could possibly create life with a quantum computer? I mean proteins are matter too, That's mind blowing to think about.

    • @troywahl9731
      @troywahl9731 Рік тому +34

      I'm a chemist. The spontaneous peptide folding is a result of intramolecular forces that lower the overall energy of the system and as the folding proceeds the peptide loses energy.

  • @richh.1010
    @richh.1010 8 місяців тому +4

    Get well. I'll continue to watch and re-watch your older videos and hope you'll be making new ones soon. Blessings to you.

  • @parksnewbornportraiture4989
    @parksnewbornportraiture4989 Рік тому +65

    So, I have been a huge fan of yours for a long time. Not only do I love the energy you bring when talking about physics and the approach you use to explain in ways even most laypeople can understand to a degree, but I really respect the way you will acknowledge your own errors and credit those who catch them. You aren’t vain, trying to paint yourself as a know it all. You’re a brilliant and passionate scientist who makes mistakes and embraces them.
    Yours is my favorite YT channel.

  • @riley._.5332
    @riley._.5332 Рік тому +357

    I have ADHD, and learning has always been much more engaging and easy for me in a space where conversation is the primary vehicle of information. These videos are absolutely stunning to me, it's such a simple concept, but it works so well to convey that real life psuedo-kinesthetic learning style

    • @Chris-cf2kp
      @Chris-cf2kp Рік тому +7

      I agree. I also think that modality is an invaluable, even integral lens to use for observation, learning, and imagination - one that any field of study can benefit from especially because it can lead to questions, connections, and ideas that have not ever surfaced before. Sincerely, from one ADHD brain to another : )

    • @slow-mo_moonbuggy
      @slow-mo_moonbuggy Рік тому

      @@Chris-cf2kp Show me one verified scientific hypothesis constructed in the entire history of cosmology, astronomy or astrophysics.

    • @sueelliott4793
      @sueelliott4793 Рік тому

      same 😊

    • @SilhSe
      @SilhSe Рік тому

      Crystals that brings you ro the 4th dimension.

    • @slow-mo_moonbuggy
      @slow-mo_moonbuggy Рік тому +2

      @@SilhSe Can it bring us to Narnia also?

  • @wybewestra7050
    @wybewestra7050 2 роки тому +58

    4:13 Interestingly, while neutrons don't have a net charge, they _do_ turn out to have a magnetic moment, and are affected by magnetic fields (but only a really small bit). As far as I understand it, this is because it's quarks (one up and two down) individually have charges. And because the quarks aren't all exactly in the same "location", the charge isn't exactly 0 everywhere.
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_magnetic_moment

  • @dimension-ji7xk
    @dimension-ji7xk 5 місяців тому +2

    When I was 8 years old ,one day an aunt stopped by with a box of crystals
    The crystals were of all different shapes and sizes and colors.
    She told my brothers and me that each of us could pick out a crystal and keep it
    I picked a purple one and immediately upon picking it up IT BEGAN TO GLOW ! ,
    THEN A PURPLE SPHERE OF LIGHT APPEARED IN THE AIR A COUPLE OF FEET ABOVE THE CRYSTAL !
    When my aunt saw this she grabbed back all the crystals and left.
    Despite having left with the purple crystal the purple sphere of light remained stationary in the air for quite a while before fading away
    When I was teenager I asked my mom what she (aunt) did with the crystals and she told me that she gave them to a monastery.
    In December of 2019 a guy I worked with told me that he went to a monastery for a Christmas service and he said that there were crystals on a wall inside the monastery.
    He also told me that there was a statue of Jesus holding a purple crystal at his heart .

  • @dorkavenger42
    @dorkavenger42 Рік тому +3

    I appreciate that she keeps the corrections in as opposed to completely editing them out. These concepts are difficult and to show that is really important. 12:08

  • @StarTalk
    @StarTalk 2 роки тому +687

    Loved this video. Great job!

  • @danielkunigan102
    @danielkunigan102 2 роки тому +265

    Your editor deserves an award for making me laugh repeatedly in an educational video, and for making you explain every concept a reasonable person would need explained.

    • @brianhenson6141
      @brianhenson6141 2 роки тому +1

      Ahh yes!, Now if I could somehow figure out how to use those time crystal's go back in time just to teach my younger self what mistakes not to make and teach myself everything I've learnt about real estate and investing into Apple before the iphone came out and to teach myself to buy up All the cheap bitcoin I could get my hands on!, I would be one very rich man by now!..... Would've could've should've, LOL!

    • @nathanallen9068
      @nathanallen9068 2 роки тому +5

      Bold of you to assume we are reasonable people for wanting to learn about time crystals

  • @artm6723
    @artm6723 4 місяці тому +3

    I absolutely love her enthusiasm! The day she comes back will be awesome. But if she can’t then hopefully she is able to at least get healthy. Wishing you the best!

    • @rlewis1946
      @rlewis1946 4 місяці тому +2

      Precisely my thoughts!
      Thank you.
      Thinking of you daily, Diana!
      RL

  • @chris7777
    @chris7777 Рік тому +20

    I truly enjoyed your explanation of time crystals. One thing I am curious about, that wasn't touched on, was compensating for quantum drift. It really is rhetorical. Thank you for sharing this!

  • @robin111v
    @robin111v 2 роки тому +189

    cool video! I have also used the swing analogy a couple times to explain it. I actually do research which builds on time crystals, and we (theoretically) found this phase which is called a time glass! Similar to the time crystal, this phase periodically shows glassy behaviour. We also talked about it with Frank Wilczek, which was super awesome!

    • @vladyslavkorenyak872
      @vladyslavkorenyak872 2 роки тому +7

      But glass is amorphous. Would that mean that the change is not between two states but between random states? Have you discovered quantumrand(); ?

    • @robin111v
      @robin111v 2 роки тому +25

      @@vladyslavkorenyak872 there is indeed no crystal structure, but what makes it a time material is that it periodically switches from a liquid to a glass phase and back

    • @hugofontes5708
      @hugofontes5708 2 роки тому +2

      @@robin111v hang on, is the glass phase consistent with previous states? either way, that is awesome!

    • @jockbw
      @jockbw 2 роки тому +8

      @@robin111v why despite appreciating how truly bonkers and cool this is, all i’m thinking is “who’s going to tell them its a memory leak, from a intern a few years ago that ran the “game of life” on one of the quantum adjacent systems and forgot to shut it down hen he left. And now its making time crystals over and above the gliders and other known forms in the game.
      The mind on this side never seems to grow 🤦

    • @robin111v
      @robin111v 2 роки тому +11

      @@jockbw well it is not just one experiment, there are many things happening in parallel all over the world ;)

  • @joryshelton
    @joryshelton 2 роки тому +40

    This reminds me very much of the novel '2001: A Space Odyssey'; the monolith was described as having sides with a ratio of 1x4x9, the squares of 1, 2, and 3, and that humans were naive to believe that that ratio ended with just the first three dimensions.

    • @JohnJ469
      @JohnJ469 2 роки тому +5

      I always think of Heinlein. If there are three spatial dimensions, why would we conclude there's only one time dimension?

    • @MarioMonte13
      @MarioMonte13 2 роки тому +1

      @@JohnJ469 interesting thought that I have no idea how to comprehend.

    • @JohnJ469
      @JohnJ469 2 роки тому

      @@MarioMonte13 Me either. He used the idea in "The Number of the Beast". If there were 3 time dimensions and you could move to different universes by swapping them around, then the number of possible Universes becomes 6 to the 6th to the 6th.
      But also, when you think about it, why should there only be one time dimension?

  • @stuffnuns
    @stuffnuns 20 днів тому +1

    it’s great to see these video’s reappearing on my feed. . .But, I do hope that we will see Diana back soon. Her enthusiasm for STEM is infectious. I hope her health is returning.
    Miss you, Diana!

  • @user-ft3vx3ds6t
    @user-ft3vx3ds6t 4 місяці тому +1

    A new phase of matter refers to a distinct state of matter that exhibits unique properties and behaviors. It is typically characterized by the arrangement and interactions of its constituent particles. Examples of new phases of matter include:
    1. Chain-melt phase of potassium: This phase of matter was recently discovered and confirmed. It joins the known array of other unusual states of matter beyond gas, liquid, and solid.
    2. Chiral bose-liquid state: This is another new phase of matter observed by researchers. It describes how charged particles interact at the quantum level.
    3. Exotic states like plasma and Bose-Einstein condensate: While not specifically mentioned in the snippets, these are examples of other known new phases of matter. Plasma is a superheated form of gas where atomic nuclei are separated from their electrons. Bose-Einstein condensate is a state of matter that occurs at extremely low temperatures, where all the atoms behave as a single particle.
    These new phases of matter often exhibit unique properties and have the potential to impact various fields, including quantum computing and our understanding of the universe.

  • @boomermatic6035
    @boomermatic6035 2 роки тому +41

    Having taken a class in quantum computing, I really enjoyed the enthusiasm that Dianna showed for a really complex subject, I wish my professor had some of that, I think I would have enjoyed the class more.

  • @ronbuckner8179
    @ronbuckner8179 Рік тому +114

    The Time crystal sensed the energy and then flipped when the pulse from the laser cycled. Not using the energy but observing the change via the time between the pulse. Put that into a mechanical devise and it could replace relay switching, or diode switching and change the energy requirements for just about every mechanical devise we build. This is HUGE! I had to listen to this 4 times to wrap my head around this. Time is part of matter. I'll bet sound is too. Harmonics is just energy frequency and the time between the waves. I love this stuff.

    • @JakeRoy96
      @JakeRoy96 Рік тому +19

      We need more people that can understand this on an engineering level

    • @jackodd8284
      @jackodd8284 Рік тому +4

      It's like the old saying" How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?" As it turns out. This many. We have the maximum level of angels right here. That is to say, the math is so perfect we can now slide on the moment. The Tick to the universes tock. Maximum lever and fulcrum.

    • @astonesthrow
      @astonesthrow Рік тому +2

      Ask Tesla. Or the Bible. Genesis 1. 'God said' has more packed into it than you realize.

    • @Jayson_Tatum
      @Jayson_Tatum Рік тому +9

      We already know that sound is a state of matter. Or rather, the displacement and reordering of matter, and the inherent effects of it. I.e. acoustics, wavelengths, etc.

    • @slow-mo_moonbuggy
      @slow-mo_moonbuggy Рік тому

      It's Kabbalahistic psudoscience. This girl is pure nonsense.

  • @werebitch1313
    @werebitch1313 11 місяців тому +1

    Cool to hear about Frank Wilczek again! 😄 I read "Longing for the Harmonies" when I was a little kid. It made a big impact then. I still go back & re-read it every so many years.

  • @iKarmaPOONS
    @iKarmaPOONS Рік тому +3

    Hello! I'm just writing to say thanks for the video but also to emphasize the format of the video works really well for people like me. The conversation works REALLY well. Have a great one! Best wishes!

  • @mstreich
    @mstreich 2 роки тому +94

    Thank you, Editor, for being many of us in this conversation…

    • @notyrpapa
      @notyrpapa 2 роки тому +4

      100% I wonder what their job description looks like.

    • @suzannestrickland1586
      @suzannestrickland1586 2 роки тому

      Yes! Levi does so well representing us

    • @genghisgalahad8465
      @genghisgalahad8465 2 роки тому +2

      Thank you too for reflecting and sharing our thoughts about the excellent relatable editor! I was just gonna say!

  • @LemonArsonist
    @LemonArsonist 2 роки тому +55

    I now need to read up on this a lot more. The main thing that's getting to me is that they break time-translational symmetry. We know thanks to Noether's theorem that conservation of energy isn't a fundamental law, but an emergent property of time translational symmetry. So when it's broken, energy conservation should also be broken. I have to assume this breaking of energy conservation is highly situational and minor though, like how conservation of momentum is broken within regular crystals but only in the form of phenomena like Umklapp scattering, as crystals break spatial-transitional symmetry, but that doesn't mean we can break the conservation of momentum whenever we like. But still, I am so interested to know to what extent conservation of energy can be broken in time crystals, even if it's small.

    • @pannegoleyn9734
      @pannegoleyn9734 2 роки тому +8

      Thank you! I was just coming into the comments to ask what the implications of the symmetry-breaking were, from Noether's Theorem.

    • @superhipposock
      @superhipposock 2 роки тому +10

      Local symmetry breaking vs global symmetry breaking. - fields during local symmetry breaking are conserved by the appearance of goldstone modes/bosons, i.e. in the spatial translational setting that's phonons. Are we actually getting some kind of goldstone mode/boson from time-crystals? Are the associated long-wavelength excitations measurable? *I haven't delved into time-crystals yet, but these are the big questions that for sure would be in the back of my mind.

    • @thedagit
      @thedagit 2 роки тому +2

      There is a video by youtuber science asylum where he says that the expansion of the universe breaks conversation of energy. His reasoning is that the red shift we see in the CMB is caused by the expansion of the universe. That energy loss that caused the light to red shift is just gone now. But I don't know if this counts as breaking time-translation symmetry because in principle that light could travel through contracting space and blue shift.

    • @theresalwaysanotherway3996
      @theresalwaysanotherway3996 2 роки тому +11

      @@thedagit it's not the loss of energy, but the loss of energy density. We have the same amount, just in a larger system.

    • @superhipposock
      @superhipposock 2 роки тому +1

      @@theresalwaysanotherway3996 this is correct. An equivalent discussion is around non-Hermitian sub-system imbedded inside a Hermitian system. Everything is relative as it turns out, but I think most physicists believe/agree that the universe must be manifestly Hermitian.

  • @corey396
    @corey396 Рік тому +5

    Can you do a video on how certain minerals such as galena are influenced by electromagnetic fields?
    I have a theory that EM fields applied in specific settings to reactive minerals may be able to shift the polarity of the bonds into a metaphysical ‘in-between’ state in which the bonds rearrange to an alternate balance state(same molecules with secondary structure). If the EM settings are applied in a vibrational manner you could “sift” the atoms causing constant rearrangement and rotation, and in that state a stable physical object should be able to pass through the affected metal. In short, allowing one to pass through a seemingly impassible metal wall when the proper EM field is applied.

  • @fiainphoenix
    @fiainphoenix Рік тому

    Well, I have just discovered your channel and I am obsessed and feel like I am learning about gravity or looking through a telescope for the first time as a kid again. Every video has so much easily digestible information. Truly enlightening, massively interesting, and often mind-blowing!

  • @jimmyyu2184
    @jimmyyu2184 2 роки тому +114

    I honestly rate R. Feynman as one of the top genius of our time, the book "Genius" was an absolute joy to read. Loved this episode, I am not fortunately enough to learn math beyond the basic calculus level. Abstract Algebra and Partial Diff Equ just went (waaaaaaaaay) over my head.
    Otherwise I would have taken a coupla more physics classes besides the required 101. Keep up the good work, I'm learning so much from you and the channel.

    • @aserta
      @aserta 2 роки тому

      You don't really need perfect math to understand complex things tho.
      I mean, think about it: A French guy and an Japanese guy walk in to a bar. Do you think they can't communicate just because the two languages differ?
      If math is a language, and this higher math is saying something you don't understand... then what you need to do to understand it is to change your frame of reference. Don't focus on the "words" focus on the odd movements of the Japanese guy's hands. You'll eventually get that he's just trying to share a drink.

  • @saiganeshmanda4904
    @saiganeshmanda4904 2 роки тому +70

    Imagine like, going on to explain something and, en route, encountering many other things that need to be be explained first. So, we branch out to those prerequisite things as they pile up more and more and we find ourselves branching out more...
    Anyway, really cool to see a first experimental observation coming out just after around ten years of theoretical understanding.
    Also, some links to the articles or any research papers is much appreciated. Thank you!

    • @slevinchannel7589
      @slevinchannel7589 2 роки тому

      I LOVE SCIENCE, so i wanna ask if you want Recommendations, but asking that repeatedly (to reach more people) is of course automatically risking that i seem like a robot, which makes people decline. A Risk, a Risk.

  • @max410bery
    @max410bery Рік тому +2

    I have just got to say that this video that I have watched 6 months ago has started my journey into going back to school for physics. Also to go back to school for astronomy and hopefully, eventually, astrophysics. I have ended up with the drive of learning more just because I have watched this singular video. 🔭🖤

  • @ihcterra4625
    @ihcterra4625 5 місяців тому +12

    There is a book by Anne McCaffery published in 1982 called Crystal Singer.
    The main character is recruited to be a crystal singer. They cut crystals that have space folding properties. They are used in warp drives and in subspace transmitters.

  • @qqq1701
    @qqq1701 2 роки тому +39

    This is the kind of stuff I wanted to be involved in when I was a kid. I love hearing about the subatomic. Forget when you know from living at our size, you throw out the rule book when you shrink down. The more things we figure out the more it sounds to me like this is a simulation and we are finding the software/hardware we are running on.

    • @autohmae
      @autohmae 2 роки тому +8

      regardless if it's a simulation or not, which a debate I'm gonna skip for now, we are discovering more of how our universe works which is really exciting.

    • @e.s.r5809
      @e.s.r5809 2 роки тому +5

      It's not too late! The maths of quantum mechanics is less daunting than it looks, and you can get there starting with classical models.
      I collected a lot of resources for my electronics degree, would you be interested in them? What sort of level are you at? (I was a high school dropout who didn't take any maths, physics or chemistry, then started uni in my 30s... so I had to catch up on the fly with stuff the kids learned at 16. 😵 Still-- I've got loads of links!)

    • @numerum_bestia
      @numerum_bestia 2 роки тому +1

      I think the simulation theory is interesting. I’ve definitely see some stuff while I’ve been tripping that would back it up if I believed in it.
      I think the universe is just chaos and chaos finds order eventually through trial and error. It begins at the subatomic level and spirals outwards. Maybe that’s just the programming learning as it goes. I don’t think anybody will really ever know.

    • @alienassasin1234
      @alienassasin1234 2 роки тому +1

      There's exciting physics experiments in the works with the intention of adding credence to the idea of our universe being a "simulation". I think the word simulation give people the wrong idea at times (i.e., people think we're being simulated by aliens or advanced human or something which I don't believe to be the case), but quantum physics and experiments like the double slit have lent validity to simulation theory for so long. Slowly the physics community will have no option but to start embracing the idea as all signs point to it being true.

    • @qqq1701
      @qqq1701 2 роки тому +1

      @@alienassasin1234 The double slit experiment is great. WTF is going on?

  • @CartoonKidOLLY
    @CartoonKidOLLY 2 роки тому +24

    I love how enthusiastic you are when you talk, it really engages the viewer. This blew my mind! I've always loved your videos!

  • @timothyp.southwick6542
    @timothyp.southwick6542 7 днів тому

    In chemistry and materials science, specific tools and apparatus are essential for crystal layering, growing, and compression. Here are the key tools and their names used for these purposes:
    ### Crystal Layering Tools
    1. **Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE) System**
    - **Components**: Ultra-high vacuum (UHV) chamber, effusion cells, substrate heater, Reflection High-Energy Electron Diffraction (RHEED) system.
    2. **Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) System**
    - **Components**: Reaction chamber, gas delivery system, substrate heater, exhaust system.
    3. **Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) System**
    - **Components**: Reaction chamber, precursor delivery system, substrate heater, vacuum pumps.
    ### Crystal Growing Tools
    1. **Hydrothermal Autoclave**
    - **Components**: Autoclave chamber, temperature control system, pressure control system, nutrient solution containers.
    2. **Czochralski Crystal Puller**
    - **Components**: Crucible, molten material bath, seed crystal holder, pulling mechanism, temperature control system.
    3. **Bridgman-Stockbarger Furnace**
    - **Components**: Crucible, heating and cooling system, seed crystal holder, temperature gradient control.
    4. **Flux Growth Furnace**
    - **Components**: Furnace chamber, crucible with flux, temperature control system.
    ### Crystal Compression Tools
    1. **Diamond Anvil Cell (DAC)**
    - **Components**: Opposing diamond anvils, gasket for sample containment, pressure calibration system, optional heating elements for high-temperature experiments.
    2. **Piston-Cylinder Apparatus**
    - **Components**: Piston, cylinder, hydraulic or mechanical press, heating elements for high-temperature applications.
    3. **Multi-Anvil Press**
    - **Components**: Array of anvils, hydraulic press, heating system.
    ### Monitoring and Characterization Tools
    1. **Reflection High-Energy Electron Diffraction (RHEED)**
    - **Components**: Electron gun, phosphor screen, vacuum chamber.
    2. **X-ray Diffraction (XRD) System**
    - **Components**: X-ray source, goniometer, detector.
    3. **Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)**
    - **Components**: Electron gun, electron detector, vacuum chamber.
    4. **Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM)**
    - **Components**: Electron gun, magnetic lenses, detectors, vacuum system.
    These tools are critical for the precise and controlled manipulation of crystals, enabling the development of materials with specific properties for various applications in electronics, photovoltaics, high-pressure physics, and more. Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) System .. Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) System .. Crystal Growing Tools:
    Hydrothermal Autoclave .. Czochralski Crystal Puller .. Bridgman-Stockbarger Furnace .. Flux Growth Furnace .. Crystal Compression Tools:
    Diamond Anvil Cell (DAC) .. Piston-Cylinder Apparatus .. Multi-Anvil Press .. Monitoring and Characterization Tools: Reflection High-Energy Electron Diffraction (RHEED) .. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) System .. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) .. Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) ..

  • @kyliedesire7425
    @kyliedesire7425 Рік тому +3

    The fact is, everything around is simply made of light.

  • @prdprdprdprdprdel
    @prdprdprdprdprdel 2 роки тому +53

    Usually, i feel like i learned something after watching one of these videos.. This time, the concepts were so far out of my pool of knowledge i had no idea what was happening most of the time.. But it was still a super fun video. Great job!

  • @psiphisapiens
    @psiphisapiens 2 роки тому +110

    The title of the video made me sceptical, having taken interest in this subject in 2015. But then I saw you posted it, and I love your content and collaborations. I was right to trust you, this is absolutely amazing. What a brilliant format. This is superb, from the explanation till the post-production corrections…. Just brilliantly done, thank you.

    • @iam1894
      @iam1894 Рік тому +1

      Nothing like a little bit of bias-confirmation lol

  • @elvenatheart982
    @elvenatheart982 Рік тому +8

    Did not understand much but I stayed till the end because she is so passionate about it. Keep up tge good work

    • @lexwill718
      @lexwill718 Рік тому

      hHAHAHAHA

    • @ItsOnF1re
      @ItsOnF1re Рік тому

      You don't need to understand it to know about it

  • @mq4626
    @mq4626 Рік тому +3

    its so strange.. it feels like im watching someone make up answers from a faded memory of reading their homework chapters the night before....

  • @InspectahPatio
    @InspectahPatio 2 роки тому +9

    "Quantum computer: Are you feeling sick
    Regular Computer: No, I'm just a bit off."
    Lol!

  • @VCNickels
    @VCNickels 2 роки тому +202

    In High School in the 80s I had a thing for Perpetual Motion. I knew all the claims were bunk but I always thought it was a neat idea. I ended up taking a Physics class with a guy that also taught Physics at the local University.
    Randomly, he brought up Perpetual Motion and all the hooey in one of the lectures and my brain just clicked on Time. So I raised my hand and said well, what about time?
    The next 20 minutes was me being dressed down so badly I dropped the glass, and subsequently left High School.
    So, this is some vindication, I guess. Eat my Shorts snarky High School Professor.

    • @rhmayer1
      @rhmayer1 2 роки тому +77

      What a shame the teacher didn't use your natural curiosity as a spring-board, and leverage that into further inspiration for you and your classmates. Even if there were things "worthy" of slamming down, a good teacher will not "dress down" a student and show off his/her expertise, but recognize it as an opportunity to inspire with a good explanation.

    • @jamesstuartbrice420
      @jamesstuartbrice420 2 роки тому +9

      Probably the motion of objects in space, which is almost a vacuum and has no resistance to slow the motion of a spinning object. That could be perpetual motion. Just guessing. In the atmosphere, there is air pressure to slow down movement. Or the movement of electrons around a mucleus seems to be perpetual motion with no end.

    • @shrimpkins
      @shrimpkins 2 роки тому +7

      Or maybe the self-organizing universe? Because, as she mentions in the video, entropy should not allow a self starting explosion like the big bang, or the increasingly orderly assembly of structured matter that followed. As physicists say, "Allow us one miracle and we'll explain the rest." That one miracle kind of overshadows all the other supposed limitations of physical laws as we understand them; so perhaps your old professor was mistaken.

    • @nindoninshu
      @nindoninshu 2 роки тому +5

      @@jamesstuartbrice420 it still won't be perpetual because just like how our planets spin they're actually slowing down, ever so little by little, due to other things pulling on it and it's even more of a problem to cause something to spin without gravity interfering with the spinning

    • @nindoninshu
      @nindoninshu 2 роки тому +2

      @@jamesstuartbrice420 keep thinking though

  • @johnwilson4909
    @johnwilson4909 Рік тому

    @4:46 To add to your spin discussion: MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) uses powerful magnetic fields to polarize the spin of water molecules in the body. This adds energy to those molecules. When the magnetic field is dropped, the water molecules will give up that energy making it visible to the imaging system.

  • @josuemartinez2660
    @josuemartinez2660 Рік тому

    love how she explains and her enthusiasm.

  • @spiritrunner8351
    @spiritrunner8351 2 роки тому +136

    To me, if I am even - remotely - interpreting this right, this sounds like the first steps to a quantum-state memory storage that could be used to match quantum computing. Locking a piece of information (a set of quantum states) in time for later release/access.
    ...but then I am much more philosopher than I am physicist/mathematician. And as we all know, if Scientists dazzle people with their brilliance, Philosophers baffle those same people with Bulls**t.

    • @InuranusBrokoff
      @InuranusBrokoff 2 роки тому +3

      🏆

    • @kepler-444f3
      @kepler-444f3 2 роки тому +1

      the annoying part would be as mentions trying to return the system to a null-state, it would require a constant reading system to check that it "flipped" back to a null-state.

    • @melinaathena
      @melinaathena 2 роки тому +4

      Not just locking in on a piece of history but we will be able to interact with our parallel counterparts that made different decisions then us.

    • @kepler-444f3
      @kepler-444f3 2 роки тому +3

      @@melinaathena how did you dervive that?

    • @melinaathena
      @melinaathena 2 роки тому +18

      @@kepler-444f3 I keep replying to this and my comments keep getting deleted because I posted a few scientific articles and my comments get removed. So basically to answer your question, an atom has a twin and one twin remains in place or a set time while it’s counterpart can go in the past or future and at sometime they meet up and from there they can exchange information. This is according to what Einstein had said. However, this is not entirely true that an atom has a twin but it is not the best way to describe it. It is known as the atom paradox. In reality, the atom depending on how you look at it wavelength which is one color or spectrum at a time you can identify where it is at a certain location. However if you look at at at a different part of the same wavelength it can be somewhere else at the same time you looked at it with the other frequency. Basically at Stanford, they did this and identified the same atom in two different locations at the same time. They determined that an atom can have many superpositions at the same time and be everywhere at the same time. This is called quantum superposition. So if one atom can be in two places at once it maybe possible one day to identify all of the frequencies and determine the past, present, and future of an atom and this can be used to see parallel universes as well as we will be able to see all of the possibilities of what the atom can do based on looking at its wave frequency and a quantum computer maybe able to determine and map the possibilities for this. So in that regard we may be able to interact with our parallel self’s one day.

  • @Omnifarious0
    @Omnifarious0 2 роки тому +145

    These conversation style videos are a really interesting approach that kind of reminds me of Numberphile. I haven't really seen it taken in most places. I kind of like it.
    The biggest defining feature of a quantum computer isn't the way the states of the individual qubits work. It's the fact that the different quibits can be entangled so the state of the computer as a whole can be sort of 'confined' to a solution by manipulating the qubits very carefully so as to entangle them in just the right way, and not disturb the entangled state once you've created it.

    • @aliens109
      @aliens109 2 роки тому +2

      Look up Fact Fiend, great channel, solely based off of one friend telling another friend about such and such trivia

    • @alesolasz6956
      @alesolasz6956 2 роки тому +1

      Another defining feature of a quantum computer is that as Diana mentioned "ones" and "zeros", these are the "Yes" or "No" states of the information on the regular computer, but on quantum computer one state can be both "one" and "zero"...

    • @Omnifarious0
      @Omnifarious0 2 роки тому +2

      @@alesolasz6956 - As I understand it, that's not a great way of thinking about it. It's more accurate to think of the state as being a point on a sphere. It's just that when you read it, you only get a one (north pole of the sphere) or a zero (south pole of the sphere) out.

    • @kerryblackburn7850
      @kerryblackburn7850 2 роки тому

      Agreed, this style conversation was superb. I will retain this info better due to its delivery

    • @shoujahatsumetsu
      @shoujahatsumetsu 2 роки тому +2

      @@alesolasz6956 Sabine Hossenfelder has a video called "Can one particle be in two places at once?", I would advise you to have a look at that to help elaborate the point that Omnifarious was making.

  • @tinagallant6315
    @tinagallant6315 5 місяців тому

    Get well soon Diana❣️❣️❣️
    Thank you so much for your upbeat personality while schooling us w a smile! I hope to see it again real soon 🥰

  • @Sean-ck7lw
    @Sean-ck7lw 4 місяці тому

    I just read an article about the scientists from TU Dortmund creating a Time Crystal that lasted 40 minutes. My first thought was "I need Physics Girl to explain Time Crystals to me." so I came back to her UA-cam channel to see if she had explained it and of course ... here it is. We miss you and want you back, but most of all we thank you for your content and explanations of the world. 👏

  • @Knapweed
    @Knapweed 2 роки тому +37

    I've never heard a more articulate delivery of a complex scientific phenomenon than this video. Her explanation of the property known as 'Spin' was brilliant and it's the first time I think I've actually grasped it. I've subscribed in the hope I can find clear explanations for some of the other concepts I've been struggling with. Good job!

    • @Chaaabrah90
      @Chaaabrah90 2 роки тому

      Read Stephen Hawking. A brief history of time.
      “Spin” is a property of quarks which give rise the forces between matter.

    • @homosexualitymydearwatson4109
      @homosexualitymydearwatson4109 2 роки тому +3

      It’s kind of like orbitals around an atom. We really don’t have words to truly visualize what’s happening in physics.

    • @Durzo1259
      @Durzo1259 Рік тому

      Any chance you could find it in our heart to explain here what spin is? I wish I understood it after watching this but all I got was "so it's not actually spinning, but it's this inherent property."

    • @slow-mo_moonbuggy
      @slow-mo_moonbuggy Рік тому

      Show me one verified scientific hypothesis constructed in the entire history of cosmology, astronomy or astrophysics. There isn't one. That's because it's not science.

    • @Knapweed
      @Knapweed Рік тому

      @@slow-mo_moonbuggy Clocks run slower at the bottom of a mountain than they do at the top. The allowance GPS satellites have to make for the time difference between their orbit and the ground. Gravity attracting photons that have no mass.

  • @kristianhiorth9236
    @kristianhiorth9236 2 роки тому +13

    I love how your wrongs and explaining why its wrong got me to understand it way better then just listening to the explanation. Great work!

  • @Dnosirrom
    @Dnosirrom Рік тому +1

    Diana is such a good teacher! She is quite good at explaining complex things for average folk.

  • @breaux2806
    @breaux2806 5 місяців тому

    This popped up on my timeline and I was so excited because I thought it was a new video, for a moment I thought she was feeling better.
    I never thought I would be so invested in the wellbeing of a person on youtube. We're all rooting for you Dianna, hope your days are getting easier

  • @llamafromspace
    @llamafromspace 2 роки тому +47

    That's so cool. Gosh I really need channels like this to break it down for me though. Well done. It must be very hard to turn such complex things into things abstract enough for laymen to follow but accurate enough that we don't all go around confidently saying Griaffes are horses. A really balancing challenge.

    • @slevinchannel7589
      @slevinchannel7589 2 роки тому

      I LOVE SCIENCE, so i wanna ask if you want Recommendations, but asking that repeatedly (to reach more people) is of course automatically risking that i seem like a robot, which makes people decline.

  • @choda42
    @choda42 2 роки тому +13

    Very cool. I love how you keep the mistakes and corrections in the video and give a shout out to the the people that caught it. SCIENCE!!

    • @belladog2752
      @belladog2752 2 роки тому +1

      That is what true science is!!!! I hope every child could watch these videos! Please parents share with your children and push schools to show these!!!

  • @lukeaskew9242
    @lukeaskew9242 4 місяці тому +2

    Hey physics girl. I hope your doing better from COVID.. I love your videos and then to stop but not at the risk of your health. Lots of ❤ from Luke in Australia.

  • @digitalassetprophet3839
    @digitalassetprophet3839 Рік тому +7

    I have a neodymium magnet stuck upside down to a pull up bar for 5 years. The magnet weighs 3 ounces. The amount of energy used by the magnet to hold itself against gravity for 24 hours a day, for 3 years, is calculable to 2,758,493 KiloWatts. Where did this energy come from, ultimately?

    • @BenjimusRawrMeow3rd
      @BenjimusRawrMeow3rd Рік тому

      fascinating

    • @BenjimusRawrMeow3rd
      @BenjimusRawrMeow3rd Рік тому

      that is so interesting to think about

    • @danc2014
      @danc2014 5 місяців тому +1

      If you glue a weight to the bar is it taking energy to hold it. Energy is used only if the mass moves and when stuck or at rest it is zero even when upside down. The magnet force is the glue.

  • @PrometheusZandski
    @PrometheusZandski 2 роки тому +8

    You have now created the perfect formula for a physics video. I've seen your other video outside where you explain expansion to your producer, but this one is much better. You describe every difficult to understand concept in easy to understand words. You then build up to the ultimate concept that you want to convey. Along the way, questions are asked and comments are made. It was just pure genius. Thank you.

  • @lyletaylor3728
    @lyletaylor3728 2 роки тому +92

    I love your enthusiasm as you discuss physics. It makes it much more fun to listen to. I also like that your editor can poke fun at you as he edits the videos. Makes it even more fun to watch. :)

    • @serversurfer6169
      @serversurfer6169 2 роки тому +4

      Dianna: "Wait, he does what?"

    • @vigilantcosmicpenguin8721
      @vigilantcosmicpenguin8721 2 роки тому +3

      @@serversurfer6169 Levi gets to poke fun at Dianna, and Dianna gets to force him to pay attention to a cool new physics concept. That's their deal.

    • @JROD082384
      @JROD082384 2 роки тому

      It certainly doesn’t come from HER sense of humor…

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle 2 роки тому +2

      We are aspects OF existence, therefore we can learn something valuable about ourselves..
      spaceandmotion

    • @Skynet_the_AI
      @Skynet_the_AI 2 роки тому

      Yeah . . . . I k n o w .

  • @pixcod
    @pixcod Рік тому

    I was watching this as I found the topic interesting. My 8 year old daughter was down here and said she recognized the voice, came over and said she's watched your videos before, something about infrared light or something, that's cool!

  • @randymarsh8936
    @randymarsh8936 Рік тому +26

    I really like how you explain things to your editor in your videos, it makes it feel more real and unscripted. Despite the "unscripted" feel you are very good at making complete sense even when what you explain sometimes doesn't.
    You're the best (:

  • @guruofeverything6379
    @guruofeverything6379 2 роки тому +115

    This is why I love physics, new theories are found everyday and there is so much to explore!

    • @op4000exe
      @op4000exe 2 роки тому +4

      The more we know, the more we know that we don't know. I love that statement, and it's very apt.

    • @kaitlyn__L
      @kaitlyn__L 2 роки тому

      @@tomkudleq it’s an illuminati conspiracy

  • @gracea2809
    @gracea2809 5 місяців тому

    I pray and hope you fully recover soon. ❤Your videos are so intriguing, such a gift, and so worth it to just learn and understand. Thank you for always sharing your enthusiasm and knowledge with us about physics

  • @oceangrownkae
    @oceangrownkae Рік тому

    Super excited for your future Physics Girl. I’m ‘hear’ for it!!!

  • @cyzure3385
    @cyzure3385 2 роки тому +3

    I love this vid not only because it’s super interesting but also because I’m a physics undergrad who wants to go into quantum computing after grad school and whenever I try to explain what a qubit/quantum computer is to someone who doesn’t know much physics, I give the same explanation as physics girl did almost word for word- I got a both a great vid to watch and validation that I’m explaining my fave topic well :)

  • @gmopotato2790
    @gmopotato2790 2 роки тому +15

    When the discovery first happened, I told my brother about it and he didn't believe me. He said it was just sensationalized media freaking out about something unimportant. I'm glad to know that I was right and this is a big thing for quantum mechanics!

    • @carl-henrikkristoffersen2313
      @carl-henrikkristoffersen2313 2 роки тому +9

      Would it be appropriate to say you were Wright?

    • @mikael1997
      @mikael1997 2 роки тому +1

      @@carl-henrikkristoffersen2313 But his brother is Wright as well

    • @Scottie_S
      @Scottie_S 2 роки тому

      @@mikael1997 I hope their nicknames are Wilbur and Orville...

  • @prakash6312
    @prakash6312 Рік тому

    I am a high school student and a lover of physics.... Physics is my love... I want to learn more and more about it....your videos are too too too amazing

  • @deepthinking8100
    @deepthinking8100 Рік тому +1

    I could listen to you talk all day! 😁

  • @FaceFaceMan
    @FaceFaceMan 2 роки тому +60

    With all that you described, I'm curious how they "observed" the phenomenon. And are there any recorded impacts from simply observing?

    • @IHateUniqueUsernames
      @IHateUniqueUsernames 2 роки тому +11

      Wouldn't the time crystal technically only exist because we are observing it? The superposition states shouldn't have collapsed otherwise?

    • @JLneonhug
      @JLneonhug 2 роки тому +9

      They did observe it but this is already a constant and not changing. The variable of which is changed is the laser that interacted with the material (crystal).
      The fact that it has "memory" state and doesn't interact with laser in pure physics/energy perspective is the new discovery.
      There are additional elements which creates this "memory", of which is the 4th dimension, ie time.

    • @BJL2142
      @BJL2142 2 роки тому +6

      @@IHateUniqueUsernames observing does not mean being seen or watched, anytime a measurement is taken it interacts with the system that is in an unknown state, after the measurement is made the system is at a lower state after the interaction as all energy and information is conserved.

    • @BJL2142
      @BJL2142 2 роки тому +2

      @@IHateUniqueUsernames want to specify that is doesn't have to be a lower after taken a measurement, the state could be higher than before measurement being made.

    • @guidedmeditation2396
      @guidedmeditation2396 2 роки тому +1

      Also what comes to mind is monoatomic elements like monoatomic gold where a pile of monoatomic dust can appear and disappear or become lighter or heavier on a whim, and if you stick something like a pencil in it, it can disappear and then reappear again into/out of dimensions... Is this just matter traveling not elsewhere other than simply traveling in TIME itself?

  • @paulmoreland7374
    @paulmoreland7374 2 роки тому +91

    I love the amount of energy that this girl gives off when talking about something that she is so passionate about and is so well at informing the audience 🙂❤️

    • @slevinchannel7589
      @slevinchannel7589 2 роки тому +2

      @yuitr loing I LOVE SCIENCE, so i wanna ask if you want Recommendations, but asking that repeatedly (to reach more people) is of course automatically risking that i seem like a robot, which makes people decline. A Risk, a Risk.

    • @kimbeach7185
      @kimbeach7185 2 роки тому

      @@slevinchannel7589 My guess is that you are a bot.

    • @slevinchannel7589
      @slevinchannel7589 2 роки тому +2

      @@kimbeach7185 You effectively guessed wrong.
      Hope you learn to not negatively-assume.

    • @bumblebootwiddletoes5185
      @bumblebootwiddletoes5185 2 роки тому +1

      *she is so GOOD at informing the audience.
      In general use WELL to describe an activity or health and GOOD to describe a person, place, or thing. In the example above GOOD is being used to describe the content creator even though you may think you're using it to describe her action. If you want to use WELL, say this:
      She informs her audience WELL.

    • @PuppetMasterdaath144
      @PuppetMasterdaath144 2 роки тому

      shes a youtuber you dofus 🤣

  • @8koi245
    @8koi245 Рік тому +1

    from 100 years to 10 years, the magic of quantum computers

  • @kateyderr3077
    @kateyderr3077 Рік тому +1

    Time is entropy. Entropy is not a spacial dimension, it is a universal rule or constant

  • @joelramos9984
    @joelramos9984 2 роки тому +34

    I love to see your videos and learn from you.
    Thank you physics girl 🙏

  • @masterpig5s
    @masterpig5s 2 роки тому +11

    I can just imagine a collab between LTT and Physics Girl.
    That could work. Explaining quantum computers in varying levels

    • @tortle1055
      @tortle1055 2 роки тому

      Who is LTT?

    • @raulcid2369
      @raulcid2369 2 роки тому +2

      @@tortle1055 Linus. From Linus Tech Tips. One of the oldest and begets Tech Tuber from the platform. I think they are the oldest and one of the top 3 begets on computer tech stuff

  • @TheBoitemito
    @TheBoitemito 4 місяці тому +2

    Looks more like a podcast than an actual physics video.

  • @billmaghan
    @billmaghan Місяць тому

    I've been using an Intex mattress for years. It's great. Easy to move, easy end-of-service disposal, and low cost. Much better than the traditional spring mattress.

  • @fb150185
    @fb150185 2 роки тому +10

    I'll never tired of saying it: I LOVE your videos. I find all so interesting but complicated and you manage to explain in a way that I can follow and be engaged. This just sounds so incredible.

    • @slevinchannel7589
      @slevinchannel7589 2 роки тому

      Conservatives are on a giant Anti-Trans-Campaign right-now.Professor Dave, Planarwalk and other Science-UA-camrs and Atheist-Channel try to oppose them, but oh wow, Fox-News, Shapiro, everyone is in-it.

  • @sodsofbeachesmetaldetectin7208
    @sodsofbeachesmetaldetectin7208 2 роки тому +13

    Hi, I have seen a couple of your vids in the past year and have really enjoyed them. This vid on time crystals had me so fixated my mind was blown. You now have a new subscriber. Very fun to watch including your crew. Keep up the excellent work. 👏

    • @slevinchannel7589
      @slevinchannel7589 2 роки тому

      I LOVE SCIENCE, so i wanna ask if you want Recommendations, but asking that repeatedly (to reach more people) is of course automatically risking that i seem like a robot, which makes people decline.

  • @swirlcrop
    @swirlcrop Рік тому

    Thanks for a video that makes me wonder about things again. Great job.

  • @Xanrax
    @Xanrax 15 днів тому

    Your videos are the only ones that don't make me feel like a fool because your able to explain it in a way that is relatable.