@NeilLewis77 I've never had the opportunity to go to a game, let alone play one, but it looks pretty fun! Besides the old timey aesthetics, the major difference is that with pitchers not throwing tough pitches and fielders not wearing gloves, it's a lot easier to score runs.
@@NeilLewis77 I played a few games, but it is men playing without gloves, catching the ball of the bounce for an out, and different bats and balls. The uniforms and others dressed in character is a lot of fun to watch.
The "Free kick after a fair catch" is a rule deep in the rulebook of the current NFL rulebook, which of course is itself a byproduct of association football and rugby football. In the context of an NFL game, it's different, but theoretically after a punt (which you described as being allowed to kick a ball after holding it) is fair caught, the team who fair caught the ball is allowed to make a free kick. It's very rare in the NFL but sometimes happens.
oh if that were to happen I'm sure there would be a near riot, the only reason I could think of would be like a punt with one second left and you were absolutely sure you could kick it out of bounds, either case, I see the coach having an aneurysm
@@afuzzycreature8387 Yeah, the use case for that would be if a punt from deep in your their territory doesn't go very far, without time to run another play. If the kick is through the goalposts it's scored as a field goal. So obviously it would have to be a situation where 3 points would matter In a Buffalo Bills - New England Patriots game a few years back, the Pats dribbled a punt at the end of the first half so the Bills couldn't do this. Then Pats coach Bill Belichick had incredible knowledge of the game.
It even has the defenders must stay 10 yards back rule. Usually defenders only a few yards back try to block it. Also, from the spot of the kick means there's no snap and hold to screw up and which sends the ball 7 or 8 yards back even if it goes smoothly. So the fair catch kick has greater effective range than a regular field goal
Two quirks of the initial laws: 1. the ONLY free-kick was a REWARD for handball (the fair catch). There was no provision as to what to do after a foul, other than, if a goal were scored after a foul, it should not be counted. Then the game would re-start with (probably) a goal-kick; 2. there was no provision for numbers per side, and often teams would arrange their sides based on who had turned up, plus with relative ability. Eleven per side was a rule of the first FA Cup, and some later tournaments (Birmingham Senior Cup for instance) started with a rule for 12 per side. Natural evolution had reached 11 or 12 as being the optimum number.
According to rule 7 on the plaque (10:21), a goal was scored on a shot between the posts and “under the string.” So, indeed there was a height limit for a goal.
It was also worth saying that football and rugby come from the same root. They are siblings, were very similar but separated. And how different they are now.
To admit, we have even rugby separated - union and league codes. Especially, I have to point that football could have gone in the same two codes' direction when there was a schism (in the terms of paying salaries to players) during the same time period as rugby had.
This is before the split between the rugby-descending sports (rugby union, rugby league, and North American football) and association football was entirely complete, ruleswise. The catches, dropkicks, fair catches, and free kicks seem to still be quite entwined in this era.
@@SormonAusPol Association got rid of the catching. Australian football dropped the offside. Gaelic rules written in the 1880s were based off the Australian rules and included some of the identical rules. Bought from the Vic goldfields or an amazing coincidence considering they were word for word
The monument commemorates the 1848 Cambridge Football rules. It has nothing to do with the 1863 FA rules. The rules written on the monument are the 1856 Cambridge Rules, which were similar to the 1848 rules, which have now been lost. The video shows rule seven which says there is a string for a crossbar. The 1848/1856 Cambridge rules had an offside rule similar in principle to the modern offside rule. However, this had been abandoned by 1863. The main reason for this was that, "in the excitment of the game", it was difficult to adjudicate if a player was just onside or just offside (no VAR then). The 1863 FA rules had a very different offside rule. Ironically, the FA brought in a new offside rule similar the olf Cambridge offside rule in 1866.
Gutta-percha is a sticky, gum-like substance from the Gutta-percha tree. Could possibly have been used for enhanced grip soles or moulded into studs of some sort?
I've been waiting for someone ro make that video since ever! Thank you btw, the game with these rules are still used to this day in street matches here, we play on concrete though
The coin toss would stay there until 1970, when the penalty shoot-out was introduced. They used it even in World Cup qualification matches, when after a third match was played on neutral ground there would still be a draw.
Fantastic video Kieran. Also really liked the way you explained whilst maneuvering over the fence at 3:37 - seemed like a genuine documentary. Very professional 💪👍🤩
"And he blasts it miles high! That's his double hat trick. Keeper making the valid point that not even Goliath could have saved it, but his protests are overruled by the referee."
The Cambridge Rules where a strong influence on the first FA laws but quite separate. The first match played under the FA laws was between Barnes FC and Richmond FC as a test of the newly agreed laws on the 19th December 1863, a 15-a-side match ending in a goalless draw. A second test was played between The Secretary's Side and the President's Side on the 2nd January 1864 at Battersea Park. The 0-0 draw between Scotland and England you refer to as the first match under the FA laws was played on the 30th November 1872 at Hamilton Crescent, Partick.
Wow. So the American football does have a legit reason for the name "football" because the original rule of football did allow using hands quite a lot.
The 1st ever game of football was Sheffield Fc v Hallom in 1860. Sheffiled FC are still playing in the None league as are Hallom. and Hallom's ground is the oldest football ground in the world. Sorry southerners the beautiful game comes from Yorkshire
Over years those rules were changed and updated, what I like is this ... the game of Football came from our country England, and we organized it with our governing body The Football Association in 1863. Our second governing body The Football League was set up in 1888 we still have today ... We took Football all around The World, as its The World Name for Our World Game!.
It was the combination of public schools and universities where the students had ample time to spend on recreation (they didnt have to work) plus the emergency of the steam train (so students can visit each other from different parts of the country) and the prominence of the british navy (to spread it globally).
So you could catch the ball with your hands, there was no goalie, there wasn't a crossbar on the goal and you could score no matter the height you shot... Plus you could actually tackle people to take them down, before the rules changed. Suddenly you understand how old football gave birth to modern football and american football and the latter now makes a little more sense to you lmao
People mistakenly think it's called football because you play with your feet. It's called football because you play ON foot. As opposed to on horseback.
Love the vid. I always thought rugby evolved from football/soccer, but the more of these vids i see, I think they were literally the same game at one time.
Many different football codes originally existed and the creation of the FA was to create a compromise between them so teams favouring different versions could play against each other. One such code evolved at Rugby School. Groups that favoured their rules, and other similar groups that favoured full contact, originally joined the FA but soon left to set up the Rugby Union. So Rugby football, a code that developed independently, can rightly say it existed before Association football.
Here's a great idea. Try to score 352 League goals (315 in the top flight) under the OLD offside law, with dodgy linos flagging offside every attack, and with goalkeepers being allowed to handle the ball ANYWHERE in their half of the field. And when you realise that you can't, then ask yourself how is it that Steve Bloomer is still SECOND on the all time First Division/Premier League goalscorers despite retiring in 1914?
The rules were largely an agreed compromise between the rules of Westminster School football and the rules of Charterhouse school football with the bias to the Charterhouse rules, I believe. It then went on from there. That's the oldest continuing inter school football competition in the world. You can find the rules of Westminster school football online. It hasn't been played since standard rules were agreed. However, it was played on a space called "green" which is behind Westminster Abbey, in front of the school. The space is not massive. Probably smaller than a standard pitch. The public school origins of football are often missed out of these stories. Here also.
Any chance you can show football before these rules were put in place? Seems like it makes a lot more sense for Association Football, American Football, and Australian Football to come from the same original sport if it was as chaotic as those images made it seem.
The training in 1860 was so so basic compared to the "curve strength-speed" and other training sessions we have now! We even have pre-match rituals (like using energetic gel, hydroelectrolyte tablets and VapoRub). Football were so much simple compared to now hahahahha
I hope people see this and realize there's more to modern sports than just "having better skills". If the ball was already heavy and rhe field is already difficult under normal conditions, imagine when it rained.
Honestly, you’d have been the best player in 1860s England. 😂 also we should change our current “arbitrary” throwins to kick ins or those freestyle throws. Speed up the game, make it more interesting.
I also heard that players was not allowed to pass the ball forward, so moving to goal is just dribble, push and kick (something like rugby). Don't sure if that's true, maybe not everywhere game was like that
Rugby and Soccer were both governed by the FA until the 1871 rule changes. The Rugby teams didn't like the new rules, so they quit the FA and formed the Rugby Football Union. That is why the really old Rugby teams are just called "*** Football Club", and many later soccer teams are called "*** Association Football Club".
Bobby Endrick loves this video
Haha Ik I get it
Fr
Jesus loves you turn to him 💕he died for you💕
@@Ishmehta-h8o Jesus loves you turn to him 💕he died for you💕
@@Qjx1208 Jesus loves you turn to him 💕he died for you💕
We should bring these rules in every game Endrick plays to make him feel at ease.
Blue comments in UA-cam before gta 6 💀
@@Mansoor6996asdfghjkldid I miss the update 💀
Did you know about any of these rules??
No
I certainly did not!
Definitely not
Nah
did you know that there was no offsides for a while
Any chance you can get 20 odd people to play a full game with these rules, pitch size etc all catered to the 1800's game?
I'd certainly imagine it's possible; here in the States we have a lot of groups that do recreations of 19th century "Base Ball"
@@kirkkerman is 19th century baseball any good?
@NeilLewis77 I've never had the opportunity to go to a game, let alone play one, but it looks pretty fun! Besides the old timey aesthetics, the major difference is that with pitchers not throwing tough pitches and fielders not wearing gloves, it's a lot easier to score runs.
@@NeilLewis77 i am sure you can find videos of it but look up the one with conan obrien it showcases the game while also being funny
@@NeilLewis77 I played a few games, but it is men playing without gloves, catching the ball of the bounce for an out, and different bats and balls. The uniforms and others dressed in character is a lot of fun to watch.
The "Free kick after a fair catch" is a rule deep in the rulebook of the current NFL rulebook, which of course is itself a byproduct of association football and rugby football. In the context of an NFL game, it's different, but theoretically after a punt (which you described as being allowed to kick a ball after holding it) is fair caught, the team who fair caught the ball is allowed to make a free kick. It's very rare in the NFL but sometimes happens.
oh if that were to happen I'm sure there would be a near riot, the only reason I could think of would be like a punt with one second left and you were absolutely sure you could kick it out of bounds, either case, I see the coach having an aneurysm
@@afuzzycreature8387 Yeah, the use case for that would be if a punt from deep in your their territory doesn't go very far, without time to run another play.
If the kick is through the goalposts it's scored as a field goal. So obviously it would have to be a situation where 3 points would matter
In a Buffalo Bills - New England Patriots game a few years back, the Pats dribbled a punt at the end of the first half so the Bills couldn't do this. Then Pats coach Bill Belichick had incredible knowledge of the game.
It even has the defenders must stay 10 yards back rule. Usually defenders only a few yards back try to block it. Also, from the spot of the kick means there's no snap and hold to screw up and which sends the ball 7 or 8 yards back even if it goes smoothly. So the fair catch kick has greater effective range than a regular field goal
Two quirks of the initial laws:
1. the ONLY free-kick was a REWARD for handball (the fair catch). There was no provision as to what to do after a foul, other than, if a goal were scored after a foul, it should not be counted. Then the game would re-start with (probably) a goal-kick;
2. there was no provision for numbers per side, and often teams would arrange their sides based on who had turned up, plus with relative ability. Eleven per side was a rule of the first FA Cup, and some later tournaments (Birmingham Senior Cup for instance) started with a rule for 12 per side. Natural evolution had reached 11 or 12 as being the optimum number.
2:16 bro turned into Lev Yashin
According to rule 7 on the plaque (10:21), a goal was scored on a shot between the posts and “under the string.” So, indeed there was a height limit for a goal.
It was also worth saying that football and rugby come from the same root. They are siblings, were very similar but separated. And how different they are now.
Exactly
And Australia rules football
To admit, we have even rugby separated - union and league codes. Especially, I have to point that football could have gone in the same two codes' direction when there was a schism (in the terms of paying salaries to players) during the same time period as rugby had.
And American football
@@louisvalentino6685not a real sport
This is before the split between the rugby-descending sports (rugby union, rugby league, and North American football) and association football was entirely complete, ruleswise. The catches, dropkicks, fair catches, and free kicks seem to still be quite entwined in this era.
When I was a kid, in the case the crossbar was missing, the rule was "you can score as high as the goalie can reach with a decent effort"
It seems the natural measure to me
This makes Australian Rules Football make much more sense
Yeah you can see how AFL and Galic both evolved from this.
@@SormonAusPol Australian Rules were written about 8 years earlier and are the earliest rules still played
@@MartinTilsed True but the idea of using your hands seems to have been somthing removed by Football, limited by Galic and Expanded by AFL.
@@SormonAusPol Association got rid of the catching. Australian football dropped the offside. Gaelic rules written in the 1880s were based off the Australian rules and included some of the identical rules. Bought from the Vic goldfields or an amazing coincidence considering they were word for word
I was honestly hoping for a full on 11v11 with these rules. That would’ve been CHAOTIC. 😆
The monument commemorates the 1848 Cambridge Football rules. It has nothing to do with the 1863 FA rules. The rules written on the monument are the 1856 Cambridge Rules, which were similar to the 1848 rules, which have now been lost. The video shows rule seven which says there is a string for a crossbar. The 1848/1856 Cambridge rules had an offside rule similar in principle to the modern offside rule. However, this had been abandoned by 1863. The main reason for this was that, "in the excitment of the game", it was difficult to adjudicate if a player was just onside or just offside (no VAR then). The 1863 FA rules had a very different offside rule. Ironically, the FA brought in a new offside rule similar the olf Cambridge offside rule in 1866.
I remember when you did this vid in like 2016 or something and I loved it thanks for making another one
The monument lists the 1848 Cambridge rules, not the 1863 FA rules.
Gutta-percha is a sticky, gum-like substance from the Gutta-percha tree. Could possibly have been used for enhanced grip soles or moulded into studs of some sort?
Probably because back then they used more natural stuff
Getah perca in malay
I'd love to see a full match of people nowadays playing footballs with 1860's rule
I've been waiting for someone ro make that video since ever! Thank you
btw, the game with these rules are still used to this day in street matches here, we play on concrete though
Hey Kieran, love the videos!
Playing a game of old fashioned football would be absolute carnage
The coin toss would stay there until 1970, when the penalty shoot-out was introduced. They used it even in World Cup qualification matches, when after a third match was played on neutral ground there would still be a draw.
Coin toss was used in women's gold cup between Costa Rica and Puerto Rico to determine who would qualify as they drawn at everything
Indeed as an example for the world cup 1970 qualifiers Morocco won over Tunisia with the coin toss
This was very insightful 😅Crazy how different it was back then!!
its interesting because you can see the origins of Aussie Rules and the relation to Rugby and American Football in these rules
Fantastic video Kieran. Also really liked the way you explained whilst maneuvering over the fence at 3:37 - seemed like a genuine documentary. Very professional 💪👍🤩
"And he blasts it miles high! That's his double hat trick. Keeper making the valid point that not even Goliath could have saved it, but his protests are overruled by the referee."
Rory Delap would’ve loved those pitches / throws.
The Cambridge Rules where a strong influence on the first FA laws but quite separate. The first match played under the FA laws was between Barnes FC and Richmond FC as a test of the newly agreed laws on the 19th December 1863, a 15-a-side match ending in a goalless draw. A second test was played between The Secretary's Side and the President's Side on the 2nd January 1864 at Battersea Park. The 0-0 draw between Scotland and England you refer to as the first match under the FA laws was played on the 30th November 1872 at Hamilton Crescent, Partick.
Great vid again! Gave me flashbacks to the older vids that you did about old football rules :D
Gealic football has a scoring over the bar rule. You get more points for scoring under the bar than over and you can pick up the ball.
The kit is low key fire
Really gives off that 1800s vibe
In America they have clubs that play 19th century rules baseball as an exhibition. Does something similar exist for English football?
the rule about a fair catch called a mark that you can get a free kick from is interesting because its a rule in gaelic football
Yep🇮🇪🇮🇪🇮🇪
poggers ive a county final tomorrow
Also a rule in AFL (Aussie rules). Which also has no crossbar for scoring a goal
@@chillichompa34 gaelic football has a crossbar for a goal but if you hit it over the crossbar its worth 1 point and a goal is worth 3 points
Also a rule in rugby
gutta percha could be used to reinforce boots in the 1860s and made them harder and less forgiving in tackles
What about the Sheffield rules ??
Wow. So the American football does have a legit reason for the name "football" because the original rule of football did allow using hands quite a lot.
Yeah, it was called football because it's played on foot. As opposed to on horseback.
Never would have ever imagined I’d see a football video with a square dancing song in the background
nice video kirean i love your football content❤❤
bro u didnt even watch it yet
11 minuets after post love the video dude. your an inspiration to me truly. keep it up you deserve more
The 1st ever game of football was Sheffield Fc v Hallom in 1860. Sheffiled FC are still playing in the None league as are Hallom. and Hallom's ground is the oldest football ground in the world. Sorry southerners the beautiful game comes from Yorkshire
Hallam, not Hallom.
I SWEAR it was in Barnes, West London, the first game under FA rules
It would be fair to change ends after each goal if the pitch was completely uneven…
This is basically how we play at school's
Serious question: Where can you purchase the old time football, boots and shorts?
He didn't mention that the throw in had to be at 90 degrees to the field of play. Similar to how it is done in rugby union.
8:34 It's spelled "gutta percha" now. It's a plant-derived latex which can be rubbery but quite hard.
As always another banger
Over years those rules were changed and updated, what I like is this ... the game of Football came from our country England, and we organized it with our governing body The Football Association in 1863. Our second governing body The Football League was set up in 1888 we still have today ...
We took Football all around The World, as its The World Name for Our World Game!.
It was the combination of public schools and universities where the students had ample time to spend on recreation (they didnt have to work) plus the emergency of the steam train (so students can visit each other from different parts of the country) and the prominence of the british navy (to spread it globally).
@@stunistus No via The Empire and people migration
In that time, the football and rugby are similar.
You are so good at football keep up the good work❤❤
Very cool video! Crazy how the game changed 😂
Some of these rules have American football vibes
9:25 AFL?
9:14 bro really called that the first ever game of football
"Official" is important there i guess
So you could catch the ball with your hands, there was no goalie, there wasn't a crossbar on the goal and you could score no matter the height you shot... Plus you could actually tackle people to take them down, before the rules changed. Suddenly you understand how old football gave birth to modern football and american football and the latter now makes a little more sense to you lmao
People mistakenly think it's called football because you play with your feet. It's called football because you play ON foot. As opposed to on horseback.
Damn love the video❤
Love the vid. I always thought rugby evolved from football/soccer, but the more of these vids i see, I think they were literally the same game at one time.
Many different football codes originally existed and the creation of the FA was to create a compromise between them so teams favouring different versions could play against each other. One such code evolved at Rugby School. Groups that favoured their rules, and other similar groups that favoured full contact, originally joined the FA but soon left to set up the Rugby Union. So Rugby football, a code that developed independently, can rightly say it existed before Association football.
Love the vids keep it up
Great videos kieran, Keep it up!
After watching this video, I need that old football outfit for next Halloween
Here's a great idea. Try to score 352 League goals (315 in the top flight) under the OLD offside law, with dodgy linos flagging offside every attack, and with goalkeepers being allowed to handle the ball ANYWHERE in their half of the field. And when you realise that you can't, then ask yourself how is it that Steve Bloomer is still SECOND on the all time First Division/Premier League goalscorers despite retiring in 1914?
This game was a lot like American football with lots of physicality and catching.
Increíble, Entertaining, Informative... All in All,.. Great and Sensational.
Big boi Kieran uploaded🎉🎉🎉🎉
Some of these rules, the goal posts and the pitch is somehow kind of like te type of game we dudes have in our schools and sometimes villages
The rules were largely an agreed compromise between the rules of Westminster School football and the rules of Charterhouse school football with the bias to the Charterhouse rules, I believe. It then went on from there. That's the oldest continuing inter school football competition in the world. You can find the rules of Westminster school football online. It hasn't been played since standard rules were agreed. However, it was played on a space called "green" which is behind Westminster Abbey, in front of the school. The space is not massive. Probably smaller than a standard pitch. The public school origins of football are often missed out of these stories. Here also.
“The greatest of all time” Kieran Brown
What a banger
flipping a coin to decide a match is diabolical
disclaimer, in a place like Malaysia, there aren't many proper pitches, we mostly play in grass and mud with potholes
Any chance you can show football before these rules were put in place? Seems like it makes a lot more sense for Association Football, American Football, and Australian Football to come from the same original sport if it was as chaotic as those images made it seem.
Flipping a coin to win a game was actually something that was a rule for a long long time, even in 1970 it was still on
The training in 1860 was so so basic compared to the "curve strength-speed" and other training sessions we have now! We even have pre-match rituals (like using energetic gel, hydroelectrolyte tablets and VapoRub).
Football were so much simple compared to now hahahahha
17:57 So Lev Yashin didn't use gloves 😮
You probably should've talked about rule no.6 offside and mentioned the dispute with the Sheffield rules.
Love this video
It seems almost like ultimate frisbee back then
My childhood fr can’t believe I am still subscribed
I hope people see this and realize there's more to modern sports than just "having better skills".
If the ball was already heavy and rhe field is already difficult under normal conditions, imagine when it rained.
this is making the Rules of AFL coming about make alot of sense
the first draft of the then melbourne rules was done in 1859, 4 years before the FA's 1863 rules, 3 years after the Cambridge rules of 1856.
Can really understand how all the spinoff games started.
We need a billionaire to fund a league of 1860s football rules.
WE LOVE THIS GAME ❤
JIM CROCE MENTIONED🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
2 mins ago but I just clicked on the notifications
Fire 🔥 ❤
Bring back taking throw ins however you want!
Bring back the fair catch!
First rules of _Association Football._ There were other English football rules before the FA's.
Training session is just a Sunday league session haha
Tyrone Mings still plays by these rules regarding the handling of the ball and dropping it.
Football association was created in 1863
And the rugby football union was created in 1871
Crazy to think the 2 sports are so closely related
Gutter persha would have been used to make the boots harder. I guess they were protecting the delicate ankles and shins of 1860's Messi types.
Honestly, you’d have been the best player in 1860s England. 😂
also we should change our current “arbitrary” throwins to kick ins or those freestyle throws. Speed up the game, make it more interesting.
“This is how training was in the 1860’”
Mate that’s how my team train today
😂😂 ours too
I also heard that players was not allowed to pass the ball forward, so moving to goal is just dribble, push and kick (something like rugby). Don't sure if that's true, maybe not everywhere game was like that
Rugby and Soccer were both governed by the FA until the 1871 rule changes. The Rugby teams didn't like the new rules, so they quit the FA and formed the Rugby Football Union. That is why the really old Rugby teams are just called "*** Football Club", and many later soccer teams are called "*** Association Football Club".
True, you could only pass to a teammate backwards
This has some similarities to Gaelic football. Crazy 😅
great football knowledge... if all true, thanx for the vid
To be fair..
the training session and a lot of the play is still applicable to alot of sunday league football
At 2:16 you looked like lev yashin
So.... basically the same rules we used to use as kids playing with friends on the street or any grass space