Crazy how Elaine accused multiple people of looking for their “15 minutes of fame”, but in less than 24 hours following the verdict, she embarked on a “media tour”. 🙄
Elaine did the media tour (as paid services from media) when she realized that Amber Heard will only Pledge their Representation Services to Amber's Legal Team.😂😂😂
If I had to try to squirm my way out of not paying a *charity for children* millions of dollars by trying to hoodwink the *world* on *live television* that a pledge is the same as payment … I’d spontaneously cease to exist out of shame and embarrassment. I can’t believe how AH so confidently (and angrily) held her ground that they were the same thing and cobbled something up
@@chelseaandhobbes Apparently, in the UK trial she said she donated it. So maybe she was trapped by that lie - and chose the synonym path to avoid being caught out in front of the US jury as a liar. Well, one of the jurors was doing AMA on tik Tok, and pointed to the synonym debacle as when he decided she was a liar. Also he was so uncomfortable with her looking at the jurors when she spoke he stopped looking at her.
@@jeninlight that clip plus the TMZ guy testifying really was a bad look for Ambuser Turd. Glad johnny got justice. Sad to see the media STILL trying to go after johnny and paint him as the abuser. Idk why they're trying to defend her so hard. Well it's a good thing if they keep doing it do people can see the media lies about almost everything.
I agree. Even if they were sequestered, i believe it wouldn’t have changed the verdict. AH did all the damage to herself by herself… ok, her legal team helped 😄
you are 100 spot on. i have been a juror twice, once on a similar case but it was a criminal proceeding. I kn ow what it is like in there to have to compromise especailly , and everyone take it very seriously. It is an actual honor to provide this service for your country and no one , i mean pretty much no one treats it like a joke when peoples lives are at stake. Every single piece of evidence would have been l;ooked at, throughout the trial and after the trial in deliberations. The right verdict came out and as far as Elaine getting on the media and basically saying she does not believe in her own countries due process, she should be ashamed of herself and perhaps think about retirement becuase at one point I empathized with her but after seeing her on the media now spitting out rubbish and lies compelling evidence that was thrown out . That was a total load of crap. as she knows the law and know the rules of the court litigation and if she doesnt like it she should retire. I have no sympathy for her anymore. she deserves everything she gets too
Absolutely. It was appalling to hear Elaine run to different television shows and insulting the jury! She of anyone should know know she can’t say that. Very very unprofessional. And I would feel greatly insulted by her if I was a juror.
Heard gave evidence in the UK case where witnesses are always advised to address their answers directly to the Judge or Jury (if there is one ) and not to the lawyer asking the questions...obviously this isn't the practice in US courts and it hasn't worked for her this time..
@@Moonlight-yx5sgthey are not, but to me that seems pretty much impossible. Even if they weren't searching for anything, I bet someone they know might "hint" at certain things..but hey..what fo I know..just seems like it would be hard not to hear or see ANYTHING about those two
Yo… This guy is full of it. There’s absolutely no proof that this is a real juror and look at this guy‘s history with posting inaccurate blatantly wrong information. This is for clicks and we all did it. And yeah I’m a total Johnny Depp fan and I can see through the BS here
@@Starry_Night_Sky7455 Not 'could be', but "IS" Miss. Download his bullsh1t audio, play it back and speed it up a tad in Audacity (free & safe software), you will immediately find that the recording is of Mr Morris HIMSELF, reading an unintelligent script he presumably made up himself, and then just slowed it down a little, before mixing to mp3. I hope the actual Juror publicly objects to this seemingly libellous publication by Mr Morris, because if I become aware of his identity, I will send him the details regarding Mr Morris being the originating public source of the claims (on Twitter). And I hope he gets sued and loses everything he owns. Profiteering from spreading fabrications and lies in public, it's a despicable 'trade' for anyone to choose. Ve
The Juror sounded genuine and upfront. What I'm thankful for is that they didn't need social media to make their decision, they used their discernment. Says alot about how we should ALWAYS TRUST OUR GUT!!! Justice for Johnny!!!!
@@witch_haunts_ghost still poor Ms elaine I think its an order from AH PR team but Ms Elaine talking to TV shows right now not helping AH at all, im not saying they dont have a voice and should not talk but I dont know, i feel like the timing is not right.
Yet, with Elaine's interview earlier, she almost insisted that the jury defied the judge's order to stay away from social media. smh.. any excuse to uphold AH's BS.
I knew that sitting in her presence and feeling it- someone was going to have experienced someone like her before and recognize it for what it was. Good job jury. 👏🏼
It’s not surprising that she was trying to hold eye contact with male jurors. She was probably relying on her manipulative ways, but fails to realize she’s not exactly the bombshell she was when she was w Depp. I guess being evil to the core really ages you 😬
The reason why everyone is talking about this case is because someone lied without any proof or evidence & people didn’t question it. Plz don’t let the host of this channel fool you. He put this out himself for views & likes & donations He has done this before with Gabby patito case & was caught out. Don’t let him insult your intelligence before you look into this. He is no better than Amber Turd & her lies. Think before you believe everything you hear. 😡🤬😡🤬
I'm sure the Hearders will use this dude's statements as grounds for appeal, that the jury was biased. He shoulda STFU rather than compare her to his ex in a public interview - makes the process look less legit. Dude, everybody's had an ex like this; we understand. You didn't need to say it out loud. As f'd up as it is, juror personalizing to himself would be something for her team of d*psh*t lawyers to jump on.
It looks like a HOAX to me from the moment she figured out that Johnny had enough and wanna get out of the marriage… she then file divorce before him with TMZ notified and throw Johnny under the bus! Continue to play the victim then represent them and killed Johnny one last time with the op-ed in front of the world!!! What a cruelty!!!
You can NEVER trust the words a narcissist speaks! If you let them know you've ONCE believed them, they hook into this and end up manipulating/controlling you. I've just been through it and had never even heard of narcissism before - believe me, it's DANGEROUS and very much MIND CONTROL.
This is not one of the jurors. This can hurt Johnny Depp and help with their appeal. They will wait for the 21 days before even thinking about anything til verdict is final. Please stop believing in this. Let Johnny finally live his life
She tried to convince the jury those two photos were different also. Imagine how annoyed you'd be as a juror when someone is blatantly lying in their face. That would have turned me.
That’s how Gaslighting works, they lie to your face, you know they’re lying because you have evidence however they continue to lie, twist the narrative to make you think you’re going insane and you must be missing the truth.
I appreciate this juror's honesty of how things went. He sounds like he was not biased and help to make sound and right decisions. Thanks for serving and coming forward.
@@suemjloaf I was under the impression that the juror themselves could come forward with who they were and talk but that on all other fronts their names were sealed for one year.
@@suemjloaf I don't know how the laws work after cases. I have also heard they can speak like this, but they will remain anonymous for a year. This would majorly suck.
As a spectator I was uncomfortable with how Amber would stare at the jury and rephrase the question to answer what she wanted to say instead of what was asked so I can only imagine how weird that felt for the actual jury members
@@jimstanborough825 I do not think they themselves could get Amber to stop doing anything!!! She literally sabotaged her own case they were trying to defend.
If AH didn't do it on every single question then perhaps it would've looked better. But questions that are so short like "that's correct", "that's incorrect" should be directed at the lawyer, that's what made her creepy.
@@slapstickdome9797 I doubt those same lawyers will want to take on her appeal. Bet they're glad to see the back of her! All that note passing was absurd.
I honestly feel that the jury did their part and stayed off social media the whole time during the trial. I thank all the jurors for doing a wonderful job. Not because of the out come mind you. They had to listen to all of the testimonies and then go back through everything all over again.
I agree. Imagine being there every single day, early morning to afternoon, for 6 weeks just listening to people constantly point fingers (he said and she said) at each other... and maybe sometimes listen to or read evidence. That's exhausting. I would absolutely hate to look through social media and see it again, while I still had to deal with it the next day. 😅
AH admitted that she was watching social media, Oh! I forgot rule doesn’t apply to her!! I told everyone she won’t stop, but in court she said “ all I want is to move on and for Johnny to leave me alone “ we all saw that she was stalking him the moment he left the court room, and telling social media where he was at all times!! ( AH is truly a monster)
Jury seems to have done well on deciding on more realistic amount of money than the one in the initial claim. Hence yes, this jury can be congratulated on being able to reach a very-down-to-earth financial decision. What is interesting yet what could have been expected is the fact that this member of the jury seemed to have relied more on his own direct personal experience with gaslightning than on hard evidence in this case.
It is so cool hearing from this juror’s perspective all the things we kept saying the jury must be thinking. We were so afraid they’d be duped by her, but no, not even close. Thanks for posting this! Justice has been served.
This youtuber was outed faking stories in the Gaby Petito case and you’re just going to believe he out of everyone else who is bigger in UA-cam just happened to get a juror, please 😒
@@WriterDude130 LOL yeah I really don't believe it but that's ok, the trial is over and JD got his life back. I would only assume the jurors reactions were similar to ours, it's hard not to be in favor of JD after watching this trial. I myself came in from an unbiased perspective but the facts clearly didn't add up for AH and her testimony which was tragic to say the least. She made it even easier with the smirking and smiling which leads me to believe she's so narcissistic that she can't even control it.
It's pretty hilarious all y'all believe this video WITHOUT any actual facts to back up this is in fact one of the jury members! Just like everyone belived Amber 6 years ago and they turned out to be wrong, I bet you anything this is fake also and actually in all honesty sounds like Joseph himself!!!!🤷🏼♂️🤦♂️🤣🤦♂️
This comment made me laugh. You hear a random guy speak for less than a minute and you say he seems like a smart and honest man? I’m gonna guess that if the verdict had gone to Amber Heard you’d be saying the exact opposite. 😂
@@noctislucis5862 lol totally! People are completely unaware of themselves. Also, who can guarantee this guy was juror? Not that I think he wasn’t, he’s responses are quite diplomatic. But, being a juror or pretending to be one is perfect opportunity for social media fame.
It amazes me that Elaine and others in the media are still championing Amber’s cause, still spewing out lies about the jury and the trial. Good to hear what I thought all along. The jury could see through Miss Heard’s deceit and cruel callousness.
When she was asked if she thought jury watched the trial etc on social media during trial, and she said yes ...its like no no dum dum. Only ure legal team, turd and friends did. She is only proving shes as awful as appeared. Had sum sympathy for her for a moment, having to deal with wicked witch however, shes STILL spewing falsehoods about him AFTER the trial rather than moving on. Its like lady, EVEN if thete were no pics etc, your client was an asstard on stand, put her foot in her mouth MANY times during testimony and cross, she shld have read the same script she had her friends/fam memorize. She elaborated EACH time she told the story. Maybe she also realizes he was the only one since, that actually gave a crap about her and took care or her loved ones also. Lastly, im so happy the jury and judge gave a fair trial/verdict.
I just ended my subscription to the NYT and told them they need to start reporting the truth: women ARE capable of abuse. We are totally being gaslit by mainstream media. I can’t believe a word of the news after this. I know what I saw with my own eyes, heard with my own ears. The losers from this trial are AH and nearly every news publication. Can’t trust any of them.
"Uncomfortableness of eye contact when you can't say anything back" Yes. This is a thing. Eye contact affects us at a very basic animalistic level. More eye contact = dominance, authority. This is why parents, teachers, employers, bosses, lawmen play staring contests with you. This is why we are told to maintain eye contact if in close proximity with a wild predatory animal. This is why sheep dogs, police dogs, military dogs are taught to maintain eye contact with their subject. This is also why your mom said "look at me when I'm talking to you". That wasn't so she could see your eyes. That was so you would look up and see her eyes. That's why that teacher said you had an attitude when you looked him straight in the eye. Eye contact = dominance, authority.
JD said he would never let AH see his eyes again. That is why he would never look at her during the trial. She was constantly looking over at him, trying to catch his eye. Maybe we all missed a major clue there. She was probably eye balling him like she did the jury throughout their partnership / marriage. 🙄 On the day of her verdict, she made no contact with her lawyer, Ben Rottenborn. She never greeted him, acknowledged him, hugged him, as she did to Elaine and her other legal representative. He is probably very relieved that this trial is over. Good Luck to BR when trying to get any money out of AH. Another law case coming up perhaps? IMO. Allegedly.
All valid points, but there is a flip side to eye contact as well and both need to be used "appropriately" and "genuinely". AH was neither "appropriate" nor "genuine".
Same here. I honestly didnt care about either of them until I saw a clip of AH on the stand and I immediately said “she’s lying!”, after that I got drawn in and couldn’t believe that she did this to him! To lie about DV and then to add sexual assault on top just to make it that much worse is despicable, and she should be investigated for perjury! In the US and UK!
@@angelwings0224 yeah I got that impression too. And does anyone really think that no juror saw anything about this case on social media? 😂 I’m sure they stayed off their phones for 2 months
@@brandonc7189 Yea they released the race and ages of the jurors and this guy's voice doesn't seem to fit any of the profiles. I bet he's just looking to make a buck🙄
No they had to compromise etc, i just knew there was gonna be that ONE bitch on ambers side and i bet thats why it took so long. Amber didn’t deserve anything fuck that 2m johnny shoulda had his 25m at the least considering the gall of AH trying to counter sue for double what johnny asked.
I feel that if this trial had not been so transparent and clean the jury might have had a different outlook than the public. The fact that we the public got to see EVERYTHING was the key to both opinions being similar. I saw a lot of minds who were in the Amber camp change during the course of the trial based on evidence.... as its suppose to be.
@@Spartan1312 but by saying that you assume that everyone who followed the trial has watched the trial in its entirety, which is not true. The vast majority of people who followed it mainly got their information from youtube compilations and tiktok video’s, which were heavily swayed in Depp’s favour
@@purplefishy8164 But the trial is still there to be watched, even in the past sense. The public who did watch it got to see the legal teams argue their points and why, we got to see the jury instructions and the negotiations as to why they were worded the way they were. It is also why everything in these cases is a matter of public record. It is one of the key functions of our legal system.
@@Spartan1312 Exactly. I have said on a number of posts that after the testimonies and evidence was presented and examined... any Amber Heard supporters remaining were people that were cut from the same cloth that she is.
Wow. So interesting to hear directly from a jury member about how uncomfortable it made him feel that she was so aggressively seeking eye contact. I wondered about that. Even when she's eliciting sympathy she is aggressive. She can't hide that about herself. No self insight whatsoever.
You make an excellent point that I have not heard before! Yep, aggressive at every turn. That’s really interesting too. It’s like a body language “tell”.
Everything she said- even her body language, when she was ‘crying’, etc. - her demeanor was ALWAYS aggressive. Noticed that right from the start. Angry and full of hate/rage too.
I think it is sad that she might have had a case but when I watched the trial for myself, her lawyer told AMBER to look at the Jury when she answered. I THINK BOTH Member's lawyers were not helping her case to say the least. Just my thoughts...
I commented that throughout the trial. Her spinning her head and staring at the jury EVERY TIME she responded was downright obsessive psychotic behavior. They all had to be getting uncomfortable with it. She NEVER stopped doing it. I'm glad they got weirded out by her.
I like the actor Depp, I am convinced he spoke the truth, and I believe Heard lied whenever she spoke. But I would never perform any "body language analysis" with actors on the stand. A good actor is just that - able to actively control his body language, demeanor, speech, etc. Also, it is not needed in this case. The countless proven lies, and the convincing statements by Depp suffice, in my opinion. BTW, I would not feel uneasy by Heard's looks. More by the assertive way she speaks.
It should be noted that all of AH witnesses did the same, so i´m guessing they were instructed to do so. That is a terrible fail from her lawyers, to not have picked up on how that was affecting the jury´s predisposition towards her. Some eye contact is a good thing. A lot of eye contact is counter-productive, because it looks made on purpose. Total fail on Elaine´s part. Right now, Elaine is still her lawyer, spinning that the jury was "influenced". But pretty soon i expect AH to throw her lawyers under the bus, and claim she was a "victim of bad counseling". You just wait.
@@Biden_is_demented Yes she may be going down that road, especially if she decides to appeal. She would be better advised, however, to use her remaining friends (if any) to help her pay out Depp, get therapy and finally get her life in order (note I'm not saying "back in order"). And hope that no one goes after her perjury incidents....
I lost a lot of hope in juries over the years but this jury gives me hope that the truth will prevail. Good over evil and justice for the innocent. Nice job jury!!
I was like him. I didn't really know much about Johnny Depp and Amber Heard's case until the trial began in US. I watched some of the trial videos and listened to the witnesses' testimonies and it wasn't too difficult to figure out who was the real abuser. And I hoped that Johnny would win since then. I'm glad that justice has been served!
I suppose many people watching the case have been in your position. At least this is my impression. In fact, seems to me that many actual survivors of domestic violence , not fans of both sides and keen cinema goers as mass media wanted us to believe, have followed this trial. Precisely due to the fact that this case was about a defamation resulting from an accussation of an alleged physical abuse. And yes, this is also why a response to mrs Heard and to the verdict has been so intense. Since most followers and observers of this trial were people like you, not familiar with her or her ex-husband until this very trial.
same here ... I would see posts froma FB friends about the ongoing case but chose to ingore them, though curious ( I am not really keen on people in show business) , anyway, not until days before the verdict that started to watch some of the videos and there and then, I should say, never that I sympathize with the woman.
First and foremost, makes me happy to know they took their jobs as jurors seriously. I'm happy they took notice of everything we did...no tears from nutty Amber, she made things up as she went along, they caught on to her lie when she first said she didn't write the op-ed about Johnny then days later slipped and admitted she had. A job well done by all 7!
My faith in the justice system with respect to juries has been restored. After the Casey Anthony trial, I was a little worried but one would have had to be completely blind not to see how manipulative Amber Turd is, right down to staring at the jury during testimony. It was quite obviously an attempt to play to, manipulate the jury rather than an effort to connect with them. Thank you, sir.
Actually, if that case had been done on “lawtube”, I think the media spun bias would have prepared people for “not guilty”. I had served on a jury and watched that trial similar to how the jury was hearing things. AND right away, I said “not guilty” for murder. At no time did the prosecutor connect Casey to the body of her child. And the whole family came off as shady people. Dad looked suspicious and came off as lying on the stand… and of course, Casey never took the stand to witness her in a examination or cross. Also, Jose, her attny, was amazing to the jury. The judge and prosecutor being over the top “acting tough”, played ok to the cameras, but a jury wouldn’t like that crap. I was Never surprised by the verdict- especially because they went overboard and tried to add a death penalty. Hard to kill a young woman who shows up and can cry in court at times.
You are so ignorant 🤣. Justice system is as fucked as before you just changed ur whole opinion after 1 trial including famous and rich people televized to the public
The Casey Anthony jury was not well informed of what their job was. I remember one juror who said the prosecution couldn't prove the manner of death so she walked. The instructions they received were terrible.
It's really good to hear that her bs acting didn't fool the jury, they say what the rest of the world saw. I thought being in the court room may have impacted the jury differently. Much respect for the judge and jury having to sit through this.
Being a female it infuriates me when women like Amber lie about abuse, which hurts women who really suffered. Sometime ago, I watched that tape, and listened to how cruel she is, and how she volunteered that she would smack Johnny around. These two were so toxic around each other, and they knew this before the marriage! Amber kept speaking about how she loved Johnny, she hasn't a clue what love is, sadly Johnny doesn't either. The settlement the jury came up with sounds fair, looks like in the end they will both break even.
I don't know about that. He has a good relationship with and says he loves his children. He may not know how to a balance a relationship with work yet was married for a number of years and sounded fairly level headed and compassionate on the audio tapes when he was trying to problem solve with AH.
Yeah my wife was abused by parents that were both narcissists. But AH is one of the worst I’ve seen. And she could tell right away who was the abuser. I worry about her new baby child and what it will be like behind closed doors.
@@themisfit9465 I hope that child won’t be abused, but I’m hopeful that any nanny or teachers of that kid would pay attention and make sure there’s nothing amiss.
I think she brought out toxicity from him that he’d maybe never expressed before. I could see him being a jealous partner but not abusive or aggressive
Her staring at them was an attempt at intimidation imo. The fact that she also made at least him, and probably others feel HIGHLY uncomfortable says a lot about how she projects herself tbh.
Witnesses are often advised to look at the jury, to connect. But like everything else she way overdid it . It was almost comical, the level of exaggeration,if not such a serious matter.
@@peaceblossom5852 Same ! Whatever day it was toward the end of the trial , when she kept staring directly into the camera ...I had to put a post it note over her face on the screen . So creepy!
@@peaceblossom5852 I agree. I was watching just the court feed until she got on the stand. I had to watch Emily Baker while she was on because it just made me ill... I needed some other energy to counteract it.
Elon Musk has to know who they really are, and have to be true that this man is a jury, on internet they are saying that was a reason for Johnny Depp for not look Amber H on her eyes🤔 a weird thing about that, So what this man is saying about the look is a confirmation Plus the Jury (all of them) on the ending was not looking at her at all, they were avoiding her🤔
She is literally bat 💩 crazy. So in her mind, Johnny can’t have an opinion in the public only Amber can? He should lose millions and she should be rewarded and the fact that her attorneys are doubling down and trying to call out the jurors and the legal system is equally crazy. I originally kind of felt sorry for her attorneys having to deal with Amber but now I don’t. Dig in deeper Elaine, you are out of your depth.
I still don't agree with how they could find both were guilty of defaming each other. if they believed that Amber did indeed defame Johnny with a hoax, then what Johnny's lawyer said wasn't Defamation and didn't have malice as he believed it. doesn't make sense
@@Heybrotruthhurts I totally agree.....not to mention that Johnny didn't even say it---his lawyer did! So how can she sue Johnny Depp for it? Just seems like she'd have to sue the lawyer. Makes no sense!
@@SadieMarie108 I think it was because he was Johnny's lawyer before he was pulled off the team for publishing that article. The association was enough to have a degree of defamation
Yes ! I'm so glad to hear a juror saying that Amber staring at them when answering questions made them uncomfortable. It was so phony. I'm sure someone told her to make eye contact so they will believe you. Instead it was just creepy. The jury just like everyone else saw through her lies.
Well she took amber as a client , are you surprised? She’s a dirty lawyer and we could all feel that she doesn’t even believe in her client . A loss for women would mean a win for amber .
Glad to hear from the jurors. That proves that Elaine's statement trying to portray them as confused and stupid is inaccurate and condescending. We all got it right
The only thing that was confused and stupid was compromising and finding that Johnny defamed Amber. That was illegal. Each is supposed to give their own vote, not compromise.
Elaine even argued with the Judge throughout the weeks........ Idk why she's still working she should've been disbarred or retire with cats as her only companions.
@@MollyHJohns That’s fine. They were required to report that they were deadlocked. If the judge determined that they could not reach a unanimous verdict, there would have been a mistrial on Amber’s case rather than Johnny being found liable and having to pay $2 million. All are required to agree, NOT COMPROMISE.
@@MollyHJohns i actually think it was good strategy to give Amber 2 million. The second statement from Waldman is the weakest among 3 due to lack of evidence. They awarded her 2 million, it will make it harder for her to appeal because in a way she "won" proving one statement to be defamatory towards her. So why appeal if you won?
Just remember any one of us at any time can be summoned to sit on a jury. It could be your next door neighbor, your co-worker, store cashier. We all have a duty to serve when asked to do so.
You actually think this is an actual juror 🤣 on tik tok ffs, if any juror speaks out which i doubt it wont be on fucking tik tok,think about it for more than a second 🤔
So much for Elaine’s theory that social media MUST have affected every juror & that they all must have looked at it since they weren’t sequestered. If even most juror behaved like this one then they came to their verdict based on evidence & common sense alone-as it should be. Amber lost because she deserved to.
If I were a juror, there is no way in hell I would have looked at the net and risked a mistrial. It would have been too important to just focus on the facts, evidence and blatant lies coming out in court.
I feel that the jury's decision was a victory for all domestic violence victims. I hope more men who suffer at the hands of their abusers will come forward.
I feel so too. And not only domestic violence. any kind of abuse, in any environment and from all sorts of people. And poor Amber, she dug her hole VERY deep with those sneaky recordings.
Thank you to this juror. We appreciate your willingness to speak. I wonder if you were angry when Elaine said, the juror’s are “liars, cheaters and that every juror was biased from watching social media. I will say Elaine openly lied during the trial and on the interviews today. The men and women that have gone through dv become very attuned to the voice of the abuser. Thank you for serving.
It’s really good to know how he felt about all her eye contact and basically glaring at them! It would be strange due to the fact that you can’t verbally respond to a person looking and speaking at you like that! 🤔
The juror sounds like they could see through Heard's maliciousness and lies! I only hope that with his honesty and the statements about the jury not being unanimous in the settlement amount gives Amber any ammunition in her hunt for an appeal, which should be denied the second it's filed since she's wasted enough of the courts time with her lies! The next time I want to see her in court again is hopefully when she has to answer for committing perjury under oath and filing false reports she made to the police and a TRO where she had to sign the report as true under penalty of perjury!
@@Harl-pic also about the "glassing" incident, not sure what the statute of limitations are on that but it is now public record in America that she used a bottle in an assault which is illegal in Australia.
It has zero to do with an appeal. The jury was unanimous. That is why each one had to stand up and affirm they support the verdict the foreman read. There will be no successful appeal here. Elaine is running her mouth in ways that will likely get her disbarred like a trumper attorney. She is attacking the judge and jury with baseless accusations. I also think the early speculation that elaine is dating amber must be true, elaine is acting like a girlfriend on tv, not an attorney who submitted tons of false evidence in a trial. Elaine should be distancing, not doubling down.
As a survivor of DV initially, I thought (pre-trial) J.D. was guilty of what A.H. said about him. . I watched him and very quickly changed my mind. I know what it means to be pushed and taunted to the point of almost breaking down. I have lived his words and have no doubt he was the one being abused.
I don't have first hand experience with DV but I've seen many survivors also comment that no legitimate DV victim would be physically chasing after their abuser trying to prevent him from leaving an argument, and speaking so aggressively and tauntingly to him. Every comment from these survivors pointed out that when you're the victim, you're walking on eggshells, keeping your head down, etc.--because you're AFRAID of your abuser--you don't hunt them down and get in their face and refuse to let them leave. That is what abusers do, not victims. Which made a lot of sense to me.
Same. As a dv survivor I wouldn't chase him to talk. I actually withdrew and would hide in the bathroom. Even 10+ years later I cannot look people in the eye as I tell about what I went through unlike AH. I also wouldn't have been snappy with Camilles questioning. I would've blubbered and started to cry. I still flinch and get meek when someone raises their voice or their tone changes or they all of a sudden stand up. So I can't fathom by any means how she can say she's a victim of dv when she comes off as the aggressor.
@@horsepanther I'm another DV survivor and can confirm, none of her testimony or 'evidence' made ANY sense to me at all, while JD's was all VERY relatable. TBH a massive one for me was listening to the tapes SHE recorded secretly and SHE chose to submit. They were so triggering and opened us up to literally hear JD, his words, his tone, everything, while living through DV. I can not even get my head around how she could imagine they showed her as a victim not a perpetrator. It was huge in demonstrating how deluded she is, as well as how manipulative, aggressive, and persistent in her abuse. I was literally told by a doctor to walk away and take a moment whenever I felt overwhelmed but I would be followed and prevented from taking even a moment. It really brought that back up hearing him trying to walk away but being pursued relentlessly and mocked for needing to escape.
Amber made her bed of lies now she has to live with them , I thought it was pretty awful what she wrote on Twitter right after about dv she should be ashamed of herself .
AH's assertion that "pledged" and "donated" were interchangeable words settled it for me, not only because it spoke volumes about her relationship with the concept of "truth" but also because it demonstrated a scheming nature, i.e. her willingness to lie on-camera in an effort to feed the media material designed to manipulate public opinion in her favour.
Such a good point and so true! People might be able to fabricate or embellish here or there to a small extent and it doesn't mean that you are skeptical of everything they say... But with Amber, she told enough bald face lies, and as you alluded to, made it obvious how sinister she was, that you simply couldn't believe anything that came out of her mouth... She is a despicable person, and that's what typically manifests when you are as disordered, clinically, as she is. Btw I think she likely has NPD as well, FWIW...
Plus the testimony by JD's accountant explaining that he on his own took the initiative to send the first installments directly to the charities and AH's lawyers ordered him to pay her instead. If her goal was truly to send that money to the charities there was no legitimate reason to waste time by adding extra steps in the process. And her saying that the trial forced her to delay those payments while she had all the money on her account for more than one full year before she published the article that caused the trial. She's justifying a misdeed based on unforeseeable events that happened way later. That's another hint at her relation to the truth. She has zero issue with reordering a timeline over several months or years just to sell her narrative.
I’m really proud of the jury. The had an incredibly difficult task. Knowing that this was such a huge case and it was in their hands must have been a little intimidating. I hope they’re all returning to their lives and getting some much deserved rest/relaxation. I hope the public continues to respect their decision and their choice to either speak out or not speak out. If any of them are reading this, kudos to you! It could not have been easy to sit in the courtroom that entire trial.
The reason why everyone is talking about this case is because someone lied without any proof or evidence & people didn’t question it. Plz don’t let the host of this channel fool you. He put this out himself for views & likes & donations He has done this before with Gabby patito case & was caught out. Don’t let him insult your intelligence before you look into this. He is no better than Amber Turd & her lies. Think before you believe everything you hear. 😡🤬😡🤬
So disappointed in Amber’s attorney. I was really feeling so I for her but now I realize she speaks just like Amber. Why couldn’t she be honest! Doesn’t she know people can fact check all these things that she is saying about the UK trial
Birds of a feather..... 😒 Elaine can't take any responsibility nor will she stop!!! Both woman can't and won't let go! Elaine will go to her grave insisting she was wronged by everyone in this case. How about looking in the mirror and right next to you, Elaaaaaiiiiiiiiiinnnneeee?! 😜😏
I’ve been on a high profile jury, although not nearly as high as this one, and it didn’t last as long, thankfully. But I really feel for the jurors because it’s incredibly stressful to do that and try to make sure that you get it right. It’s a really heavy weight to carry because you’re messing with people’s lives, and you really don’t want to make a mistake. After my case finished, both sides were instructed to not contact us for a certain amount of time, and one side actually violated it the day after the trial ended.
I served as a juror back in 2006. Not even close to a high profile case but it was a criminal case. Older woman in her late 50’s selling drugs to an undercover drug police task force trying to go after the bigger fish. We didn’t have the entire evidence because they were going after a bigger fish still. Defense counsel was trying to paint a older grandmother trying to get by in life. But in the end all of us unanimously had her guilty. We told her defense counsel the reason was that all he tried to do was get evidence thrown out via tampering or not handle properly. They never tried to say she wasn’t selling drugs.
This trial was fraught with so many complications throughout but at the same time, several red flags went up on the AH side like the donation/pledge thing, the same picture in two versions of colors, her obviously sudden changes of emotions on stand etc etc. Guess those were what made it easier for the jurors to arrive at their conclusions. Well done, Jurors, immense thanks to you all for investing so much time, patience and sacrifice for this case.
She thinks Punching and hitting are different, as she said i'm not punching you, i'm hitting you. But pledge and donate are the same in her dictionary.
*ATTENTION * I just want to make people aware that this guy has a history of giving false information for views and posting corpses in thumbnails apparently. Another youtuber has mentioned if you slow down his voice it sounds a hell of a lot like the " Jurors ." This can be Extremely damaging for Johnny Depp. So please don't take this as fact.
Also I hardly believe the juror would call amber a "crazy" woman on his post so soon / if ever after the trial ..although we all know she def is crazy but for juror to say that, IS a bad move, considering it can possibly be brought back up to the courts,and may try lookin to get it reversed on mistrial grounds, if that's actually a thing In civil court. 🤔.. Just sayin ......... It can havr a strong motion to act on during appeals ..
This was awesome 👏🏻 to hear the jury member talk about it. This jury gives me faith in our justice system, which I at times have thought it unjust! This Jury was amazing, very intelligent, and did the right thing! I have seen men get beat down by certain women! I have witnessed a woman (an ex-friend) accuse a man of date rape, and it was a total LIE. She was married, but would hang out at the bar, and totally set her sights on a certain guy. Weekend after weekend she flirted, and then finally got him to sleep with her. We were all there! When it was time to go, she refused to go home. Me and my husband tried to get to go, but she wouldn’t. She was drunk, but not to the point of oblivion. Well, after that night, he wasn’t looking for a relationship with her, and she didn’t like that, so she claimed date rape about a week later after she admitted to an affair to her husband. They both came up with this story to justify her actions I guess. Luckily, all of us witnesses that knew that to not be the case told her if she went to authorities with that story, we would come forward and tell them it’s NOT TRUE. Since then we are no longer friends, but I wasn’t about to let her ruin some guys life with her out right LIE!!!!! It’s disgusting what some women have done to these innocent men!! Amber is still lying! Amber claimed every credible witness was a liar, now she is claiming the Jury was wrong, because she is a typical narcissistic ass hole!
I commend you for defending that innocent man, thank you. You did right and her actions on all counts indicated to you it was time to go NC. Some women are disgusting just like AH - from the moment I heard she defecated in JD's bed and the account she spun I knew things would go downhill for her and they did - her credibility on all fronts remained questionable.
I saw a story some guy put out there. He looked to be mid-thirties, fit, decent looking, had a house with land, horses, truck, etc... He meets a chick on the internet. They converse over a period of time. Pretty soon, she comes over in a mini skirt, too much make-up, long hair. One thing leads to another and they have sex. She decides she doesn't want to leave. At all. He would like for her to leave. Point of contention... She stays a couple of days. He still wants her to leave but she refuses. He's beginning to really dislike her. He's in and out of the house, going about his business on the land. Finally he throws her out after several more days. She cries rape.
Just found out about 2 months ago my mom did this to a man when I was a kid. She dated him and then “left him” claimed he broke into our home and raped her. Well she’s been married/divorced in the time in between and STARTED DATING HIM AGAIN YEARS LATER. SHE ADMITTED SHE ACCUSED HIM BUT HE DIDNT!!! 🤯🤯🤯 We don’t really get along great anyway but this was another level. Hurt me because I’ve been SAed twice. It’s not something you lie about!!! SMH.
I know a woman who flaunted her sexuality quite a lot, and was quite open about being into BDSM. She had a sexual relationship with a man who she had a violent, BDSM sexual relationship with, and often obtained visible bruises by this ... activity.. bruises she photographed and posted to social media, and bragged about. The man then got cross with her, and ended the relationship because he felt embarrassed about the intimate details of their sexual relationship being broadcasted to an audience. She then felt very hurt by his reaction, and claimed that it was sexual abuse. The man was an asshole, he was a radical left winged communist type of man and had a lot of sexual affairs with a lot of women while ina relationship with a woman who knew nothing, while everyone else knew. But, she was a cunt too. He was an asshole, however, she was not a victim of his. Still, I understand her perpsective also. Because I think this free love mentality, this freedom of sex without commitment isn't necessarily such a great thing. To be honest, I have too been caught in this web, as a single woman I have too often engaged sexually with men, because of some hope that he might fall in love and want a relationship. Because the man says that he needs a sexual relationship to fall in love, or that he doesn't know if he wants a relationship unless he has sex. So I have concented under false premises, so off course I end up being hurt. I have concented to have sex with men who has no obligation to me, no sence of responsibily or care about my value as a human being. Off course it has been rough on my mental and emotional health. So I understand her, but it's such a grey area. I understand how many women wants to retract their concent, but legally that's like.. How??!? I think there is too much chaos, obscurity and confusion about sexual relationships. Once you open the door towards sex, you let in all the force of nature. And nature is bunnyrabbits and rainbows and flowers and butterflies and bees, but it's also wasps, bears and siberian tigers which will sting, hurt and devour you.. so.. our culture has failed the young generation in guidance about sex, I think. And I don't think that sex, in an evolutionary and historical sence can ever be described as being without commitment, at least not to women. Sex is wonderful and awful, sex is life, pregnancy, babies and life long commitment, and also even death and disease and grief and trauma.. I don't think our culture is very good at having an honest discussion about sex. Now, I am much more concervative. I tell men "the intimate aspects of my being i secretive, my sexuality is of such value to me that I do not share it with anyone, without that person feeling love and obligation towards me. God loves me, a lot. And i cannot allow anyone to treat me in a way which dishonours Gods love towards me." And I think that kind of personal responsibility is what will solve a lot of the issues and power imbalances inbetween men and women. And also, I really do not like it when people speak openly about intimate details about their sexual lives with me. I hate it. They feel incredibly rightouss about being able to flaunt their sexuality, but in doing so they completely disregard me. They don't know me or my sexual history. They don't know whether or not I have a traumatic sexual history, which makes it impossible for me to participate in such conversation. Or how I feel about my own intimate being, I feel protective of my intimate being. So, I think that it is important to protect each other from our selves, we protect each other from our sexuality. My sexuality is not something I can expect other people to want to participate in, so i protect people from myselfe in that regard. By keeping it to my selfe, and dress and act proper. I don't like it when people flaunt their sexuality towards me, it makes me anxious and sad.
Would love to believe this was actually from a juror, unfortunately I'm a skeptic and would need some sort of proof without knowing their personal information.
I watched the entire trial. Amber Heard actually did shed a tear once or twice. HOWEVER, the times when she shed the tears were just when she was talking about her sadness about her marriage failing and the wedding dress she had just gotten. She never shed a tear, and was obviously fake crying, every single time she spoke about the supposed "abuse".
I just rewatched it also. And I did actually see a tiny bit of tears at the end of her SA story in Australia. You can see a little bit on the outside of her left eye. I honestly think she probably kept on trying over and over and over to cry and that's all that would come out. Cuz if she was really crying she would have tears streaming down her face. Pretty pathetic right?
Actually I have to agree with you. I did notice she had a moment of actual tears running down her face but it was not about the abuse but her pain of losing Johnny Depp and the hell she put him through. I felt her one time tears came from a different emotion that she pushed herself to cry.
Thanks for this video. There was great questions for this anonymous juror They got it right from what they were given to work with in making a decision. I'm happy for Johnny that he won his case. The damages and proof of those damages (physical, emotional, and financial abuse were the damages HE suffered from Ms. Heard.) This is a victory for justice, which means a lot to me.
Except the moron who felt Depp defamed Amber as well. Even if he did, there was no consequence to her. She didn't lose any rolls over that. She's only losing rolls now that all this shit came out in the trail and all the fans have been demanding she get cut. That stupid statement from his attorney or agent, FFS was inconsequential. But apparently at least one METOO'er was on the jury and so HAD to at least throw AH a bone. But all in all a huge win, and I am very thankful.
@@cryptojihadi265 for me i think that made it more realistic. Imagine the scepticism if the whole jury would have been completely 100% Johnny's side. People would call them to be biased and say verdict was bought by JD and what not.
a lot of the men in the jury were said to be of asian descent. he speaks with a faint accent like he is bilingual asian american. i am half korean and i can verify the accent
Why would a legit juror out themselves on TikTok? This sounds like a scam and we need to be careful because this could compromise the case. Also what Elaine is doing by throwing the jury under the bus and saying they were influenced by social media is despicable! It totally undermines the system in which she is licensed to practice law.
This happened after the OJ trial. It doesn't matter tbh. One of them wrote a book IIRC. Heard + EB are evil though and went after the nurse's license and reported her "former friend" to the IRS. I wouldn't out myself until after her appeals were exhausted but maybe the guy or gal is judgment proof. Who knows if this is real tho.
Elaine is not undermining the system. She is destroying her credibility as a lawyer. Everyone knows that a jury is not allowed to consider any media while they are jurying.
Haha, that was my exact thoughts while watching it, how incredibly annyoing it must have been to have her constantly turning and talking to you instead of the person asking the question. I think I also would have just looked away after a while..
If it is a trial by judge, folks are told to speak to the judge. If it is a trial by jury, folks are told to talk to the jury. It is the jury one must convince. If someone was making a case to you for their own point of view, how would it feel if they looked everywhere except at you? Not very convincing in that context.
@@mrbob4u495 if you have to explain something then yes look at the jury, if you say "that's correct" why would you need to face the jury it just makes you creepy.
"What a crazy woman." That sent me.😂 Amber worked so hard to hide it, yet the jury had her pegged all along. You can't hide crazy, at least not for long.🤷
Thank you so much for your Service on the Trial. I know it was a long 6 weeks for all of you and I appreciated everyone of you and your answers. I'm glad you could see her as BS as the rest of the world did. Thank you all for giving Johnny his life back he deserves it. God bless 🙏
Being a juror is already an intimidating task. Imagine the person getting sued continuously staring at you while talking. It'd feel like a subtle threat/warning. Good on the jurors for 💯 obliterating her.
exactly. That's what i was always saying. Her staring at them, esp when she'd drink her drink and cut her eyes at them, she looked intimidating. Like she wants to boss on them to do right by her. It was bad
How do you know for a FACT that this person is a legit jury member? It could be anyone claiming to be a juror, when they had nothing to do with the trial. It could even be someone from Amber's team trying to get a mistrial.
The case isn't over at all They have to meet to discuss certain things. Numerous lawyers have stated not to speak to these people incase they are members of AH team. They are citing social media for grounds of appeal, then like magic, jurors pop up speaking. Yeah right
Crazy how Elaine accused multiple people of looking for their “15 minutes of fame”, but in less than 24 hours following the verdict, she embarked on a “media tour”. 🙄
😂😂😂
Elaine did the media tour (as paid services from media) when she realized that Amber Heard will only Pledge their Representation Services to Amber's Legal Team.😂😂😂
She's got to make money somehow because AH ain't paying up!!! Lol
Just kidding. AH has insurance that's been paying.
Imagine that!
She's just like AH
She lost when she tried to explain that donating and pledging are synonyms. That right there baselined her veracity for the jurors.
If I had to try to squirm my way out of not paying a *charity for children* millions of dollars by trying to hoodwink the *world* on *live television* that a pledge is the same as payment … I’d spontaneously cease to exist out of shame and embarrassment.
I can’t believe how AH so confidently (and angrily) held her ground that they were the same thing and cobbled something up
@@chelseaandhobbes Apparently, in the UK trial she said she donated it. So maybe she was trapped by that lie - and chose the synonym path to avoid being caught out in front of the US jury as a liar. Well, one of the jurors was doing AMA on tik Tok, and pointed to the synonym debacle as when he decided she was a liar. Also he was so uncomfortable with her looking at the jurors when she spoke he stopped looking at her.
@@chelseaandhobbes that was some funny shit! Spontaneously cease to exist! Lol! I bust out laughing 😃
Or the great video where she admits to alerting TMZ, then quickly tries to cover her ugly face realizing she caught herself up…
@@jeninlight that clip plus the TMZ guy testifying really was a bad look for Ambuser Turd. Glad johnny got justice. Sad to see the media STILL trying to go after johnny and paint him as the abuser. Idk why they're trying to defend her so hard. Well it's a good thing if they keep doing it do people can see the media lies about almost everything.
I think the jury listened, weighed the evidence heard the recordings and took their job very seriously, like all juries should: well done 👍🏼👏🏼👏🏼💜
I agree. Even if they were sequestered, i believe it wouldn’t have changed the verdict. AH did all the damage to herself by herself… ok, her legal team helped 😄
Right!
Actually the jury made erroneous judgements. Out of 3 statements they got 2 wrong conclusions.
you are 100 spot on. i have been a juror twice, once on a similar case but it was a criminal proceeding. I kn ow what it is like in there to have to compromise especailly , and everyone take it very seriously. It is an actual honor to provide this service for your country and no one , i mean pretty much no one treats it like a joke when peoples lives are at stake. Every single piece of evidence would have been l;ooked at, throughout the trial and after the trial in deliberations. The right verdict came out and as far as Elaine getting on the media and basically saying she does not believe in her own countries due process, she should be ashamed of herself and perhaps think about retirement becuase at one point I empathized with her but after seeing her on the media now spitting out rubbish and lies compelling evidence that was thrown out . That was a total load of crap. as she knows the law and know the rules of the court litigation and if she doesnt like it she should retire. I have no sympathy for her anymore. she deserves everything she gets too
Absolutely. It was appalling to hear Elaine run to different television shows and insulting the jury! She of anyone should know know she can’t say that. Very very unprofessional. And I would feel greatly insulted by her if I was a juror.
I don't believe that this is someone on that jury at all.
The way she kept staring at the jury freaked me out, and I wasn't there. She's scary.
It was her attorney's idea. I have no clue what they were thinking.
Yeah, I feel like she's going to hold a vendetta against that jury and try to harass them. Psycho b***
Heard gave evidence in the UK case where witnesses are always advised to address their answers directly to the Judge or Jury (if there is one ) and not to the lawyer asking the questions...obviously this isn't the practice in US courts and it hasn't worked for her this time..
Are you a man?with one punch will make her forget her name
Yeah, that was very odd behaviour!
Juror sounds like a real, genuine, authentic, down to earth person, with common sense.
I hope him saying all of this was real! I'm hopeful and believe it, but you have to wonder in this world.
Thank you 🙏 juror, spot on!
How can we confirm it's real? I thought jurors can't speak until a year later.
People usually do when they successfully end up on a jury
They sound like a voice
Glad to hear him clarify how jurors were not privy to social media during this time, this will help knock down AH's chance of appeal
Omg that would be great cause she’s done enough damage to Johnnys well being, it’s time for her to leave and get the heck out of the country.
If Elaine keeps bashing and blaming the jury and court it will catch up with her in appeals!
@@sorrella oh that would be good
If I remember correctly they’re not suppose to research anything during trial.
@@Moonlight-yx5sgthey are not, but to me that seems pretty much impossible. Even if they weren't searching for anything, I bet someone they know might "hint" at certain things..but hey..what fo I know..just seems like it would be hard not to hear or see ANYTHING about those two
Yo… This guy is full of it. There’s absolutely no proof that this is a real juror and look at this guy‘s history with posting inaccurate blatantly wrong information. This is for clicks and we all did it. And yeah I’m a total Johnny Depp fan and I can see through the BS here
Could be.
@@Starry_Night_Sky7455 Not 'could be', but "IS" Miss. Download his bullsh1t audio, play it back and speed it up a tad in Audacity (free & safe software), you will immediately find that the recording is of Mr Morris HIMSELF, reading an unintelligent script he presumably made up himself, and then just slowed it down a little, before mixing to mp3. I hope the actual Juror publicly objects to this seemingly libellous publication by Mr Morris, because if I become aware of his identity, I will send him the details regarding Mr Morris being the originating public source of the claims (on Twitter). And I hope he gets sued and loses everything he owns. Profiteering from spreading fabrications and lies in public, it's a despicable 'trade' for anyone to choose. Ve
ITS FAKE! The host of this channel did it He is KNOWN FOR LYING to get views & likes
JOSEPH MORRIS DID THIS HIMSELF ITS FAKE & NOT A JUROR DONT LET HIM INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE 🤬😡🤬😡
The Juror sounded genuine and upfront. What I'm thankful for is that they didn't need social media to make their decision, they used their discernment. Says alot about how we should ALWAYS TRUST OUR GUT!!! Justice for Johnny!!!!
Exactly!! This also blows Elaine's remarks this morning out of the water of how the jurors were privvy to outside information. She's a liar as well.
@@witch_haunts_ghost still poor Ms elaine I think its an order from AH PR team but Ms Elaine talking to TV shows right now not helping AH at all, im not saying they dont have a voice and should not talk but I dont know, i feel like the timing is not right.
Elaine has said in an interview the jurors were influenced by media the woman can’t accept defeat
Yet, with Elaine's interview earlier, she almost insisted that the jury defied the judge's order to stay away from social media. smh.. any excuse to uphold AH's BS.
@@witch18Lho I hope Johnny's team will be able to use it against Amber's case if they appeal
I knew that sitting in her presence and feeling it- someone was going to have experienced someone like her before and recognize it for what it was. Good job jury. 👏🏼
It’s not surprising that she was trying to hold eye contact with male jurors. She was probably relying on her manipulative ways, but fails to realize she’s not exactly the bombshell she was when she was w Depp. I guess being evil to the core really ages you 😬
Reminds me of my ex tbh, would gas light and belittle me whenever she’d get upset.
@@astrodude9146 its astonishing how cluster B people act the same...it's like they go to Narc U...this guy knew it...so glad they saw the BS
The reason why everyone is talking about this case is because someone lied without any proof or evidence & people didn’t question it. Plz don’t let the host of this channel fool you. He put this out himself for views & likes & donations He has done this before with Gabby patito case & was caught out. Don’t let him insult your intelligence before you look into this. He is no better than Amber Turd & her lies. Think before you believe everything you hear. 😡🤬😡🤬
“ everything heard said seemed like Bullshit”....pretty much consensus and straight to the point. Good job Jurors.
I'm sure the Hearders will use this dude's statements as grounds for appeal, that the jury was biased. He shoulda STFU rather than compare her to his ex in a public interview - makes the process look less legit. Dude, everybody's had an ex like this; we understand. You didn't need to say it out loud. As f'd up as it is, juror personalizing to himself would be something for her team of d*psh*t lawyers to jump on.
@@zyrosqrd2552 it's going to be really hard to appeal when there's not guaranteed proof of it being an actual juror during the case.
It looks like a HOAX to me from the moment she figured out that Johnny had enough and wanna get out of the marriage… she then file divorce before him with TMZ notified and throw Johnny under the bus!
Continue to play the victim then represent them and killed Johnny one last time with the op-ed in front of the world!!!
What a cruelty!!!
You can NEVER trust the words a narcissist speaks! If you let them know you've ONCE believed them, they hook into this and end up manipulating/controlling you. I've just been through it and had never even heard of narcissism before - believe me, it's DANGEROUS and very much MIND CONTROL.
@@zyrosqrd2552 none of my exes were like amber heard
This is not one of the jurors. This can hurt Johnny Depp and help with their appeal. They will wait for the 21 days before even thinking about anything til verdict is final. Please stop believing in this. Let Johnny finally live his life
She tried to convince the jury those two photos were different also. Imagine how annoyed you'd be as a juror when someone is blatantly lying in their face. That would have turned me.
I was so annoyed at her testimony, the audacity of her to think she can manipulate anyone and everyone..
That’s how Gaslighting works, they lie to your face, you know they’re lying because you have evidence however they continue to lie, twist the narrative to make you think you’re going insane and you must be missing the truth.
AH: "Of course these two photos are different, I edited them myself!!!"
Yupp, it's fucking insulting to the jury to think they would believe this nonsense
She literally thinks everyone is just that stupid that they’d not get the fact that it’s the exact same photo and her lying is enough to cover that up
I appreciate this juror's honesty of how things went. He sounds like he was not biased and help to make sound and right decisions. Thanks for serving and coming forward.
This youtuber has faked stuff before apparently. Thats the word anyway. He faked being some fugitive. I think this is BS
The jury members are not allowed to speak about the case so this is not true
@@suemjloaf I was under the impression that the juror themselves could come forward with who they were and talk but that on all other fronts their names were sealed for one year.
@@commiecomrade2644 if this is true, I hope there is truthful exposure.
@@suemjloaf I don't know how the laws work after cases. I have also heard they can speak like this, but they will remain anonymous for a year. This would majorly suck.
As a spectator I was uncomfortable with how Amber would stare at the jury and rephrase the question to answer what she wanted to say instead of what was asked so I can only imagine how weird that felt for the actual jury members
Her lawyers should have got her to stop doing that. Poorly coached I thought
@@jimstanborough825 Most of her witnesses did the exact same thing so I assumed that they were coached to do exactly that
@@jimstanborough825 I do not think they themselves could get Amber to stop doing anything!!! She literally sabotaged her own case they were trying to defend.
If AH didn't do it on every single question then perhaps it would've looked better. But questions that are so short like "that's correct", "that's incorrect" should be directed at the lawyer, that's what made her creepy.
@@slapstickdome9797 I doubt those same lawyers will want to take on her appeal. Bet they're glad to see the back of her! All that note passing was absurd.
That Is not an actual juror. Come on now people!
I honestly feel that the jury did their part and stayed off social media the whole time during the trial. I thank all the jurors for doing a wonderful job. Not because of the out come mind you. They had to listen to all of the testimonies and then go back through everything all over again.
I agree. Imagine being there every single day, early morning to afternoon, for 6 weeks just listening to people constantly point fingers (he said and she said) at each other... and maybe sometimes listen to or read evidence. That's exhausting.
I would absolutely hate to look through social media and see it again, while I still had to deal with it the next day. 😅
Technically all we can say is he says he stayed off Social Media. He can't really speak for the other jurors.
AH admitted that she was watching social media, Oh! I forgot rule doesn’t apply to her!! I told everyone she won’t stop, but in court she said “ all I want is to move on and for Johnny to leave me alone “ we all saw that she was stalking him the moment he left the court room, and telling social media where he was at all times!! ( AH is truly a monster)
Jury seems to have done well on deciding on more realistic amount of money than the one in the initial claim. Hence yes, this jury can be congratulated on being able to reach a very-down-to-earth financial decision. What is interesting yet what could have been expected is the fact that this member of the jury seemed to have relied more on his own direct personal experience with gaslightning than on hard evidence in this case.
@@nancygallantclough7623 Preach… And her delusional Girlfriend. They will live happy together in their fantasy land.
It is so cool hearing from this juror’s perspective all the things we kept saying the jury must be thinking. We were so afraid they’d be duped by her, but no, not even close. Thanks for posting this! Justice has been served.
its literally a guy with a burner account on tiktok, could be anybody
This youtuber was outed faking stories in the Gaby Petito case and you’re just going to believe he out of everyone else who is bigger in UA-cam just happened to get a juror, please 😒
@@WriterDude130 LOL yeah I really don't believe it but that's ok, the trial is over and JD got his life back. I would only assume the jurors reactions were similar to ours, it's hard not to be in favor of JD after watching this trial. I myself came in from an unbiased perspective but the facts clearly didn't add up for AH and her testimony which was tragic to say the least. She made it even easier with the smirking and smiling which leads me to believe she's so narcissistic that she can't even control it.
The Juror seems like a smart, honest man. He went with his gut feeling and that led to the truth. Thank you so much Mr. Juror.
It's pretty hilarious all y'all believe this video WITHOUT any actual facts to back up this is in fact one of the jury members! Just like everyone belived Amber 6 years ago and they turned out to be wrong, I bet you anything this is fake also and actually in all honesty sounds like Joseph himself!!!!🤷🏼♂️🤦♂️🤣🤦♂️
This comment made me laugh. You hear a random guy speak for less than a minute and you say he seems like a smart and honest man? I’m gonna guess that if the verdict had gone to Amber Heard you’d be saying the exact opposite. 😂
@@noctislucis5862 Actually, you are wrong. Nice try though.
@@Bizzy7891 When you reply, it helps to construct your sentences to make sense. Lmao!
@@noctislucis5862 lol totally! People are completely unaware of themselves. Also, who can guarantee this guy was juror? Not that I think he wasn’t, he’s responses are quite diplomatic. But, being a juror or pretending to be one is perfect opportunity for social media fame.
Thanks for sharing this! It's great to hear the perspective of a juror!
Thank God for these down-to-earth jurors.
It amazes me that Elaine and others in the media are still championing Amber’s cause, still spewing out lies about the jury and the trial. Good to hear what I thought all along. The jury could see through Miss Heard’s deceit and cruel callousness.
They both deserve each other lol.
When she was asked if she thought jury watched the trial etc on social media during trial, and she said yes ...its like no no dum dum. Only ure legal team, turd and friends did. She is only proving shes as awful as appeared. Had sum sympathy for her for a moment, having to deal with wicked witch however, shes STILL spewing falsehoods about him AFTER the trial rather than moving on. Its like lady, EVEN if thete were no pics etc, your client was an asstard on stand, put her foot in her mouth MANY times during testimony and cross, she shld have read the same script she had her friends/fam memorize. She elaborated EACH time she told the story. Maybe she also realizes he was the only one since, that actually gave a crap about her and took care or her loved ones also.
Lastly, im so happy the jury and judge gave a fair trial/verdict.
I agree, doesn't she/they have anything better to do?
I just ended my subscription to the NYT and told them they need to start reporting the truth: women ARE capable of abuse. We are totally being gaslit by mainstream media. I can’t believe a word of the news after this. I know what I saw with my own eyes, heard with my own ears. The losers from this trial are AH and nearly every news publication. Can’t trust any of them.
They will stop soon because AH cannot pay them anymore. Can you say: BANKRUPT 😳
"Uncomfortableness of eye contact when you can't say anything back"
Yes. This is a thing. Eye contact affects us at a very basic animalistic level. More eye contact = dominance, authority. This is why parents, teachers, employers, bosses, lawmen play staring contests with you. This is why we are told to maintain eye contact if in close proximity with a wild predatory animal. This is why sheep dogs, police dogs, military dogs are taught to maintain eye contact with their subject. This is also why your mom said "look at me when I'm talking to you". That wasn't so she could see your eyes. That was so you would look up and see her eyes. That's why that teacher said you had an attitude when you looked him straight in the eye. Eye contact = dominance, authority.
Excellent, accurate points.
Holy shit that's why I avoid eye contact
JD said he would never let AH see his eyes again. That is why he would never look at her during the trial. She was constantly looking over at him, trying to catch his eye. Maybe we all missed a major clue there. She was probably eye balling him like she did the jury throughout their partnership / marriage.
🙄
On the day of her verdict, she made no contact with her lawyer, Ben Rottenborn. She never greeted him, acknowledged him, hugged him, as she did to Elaine and her other legal representative. He is probably very relieved that this trial is over. Good Luck to BR when trying to get any money out of AH. Another law case coming up perhaps?
IMO. Allegedly.
All valid points, but there is a flip side to eye contact as well and both need to be used "appropriately" and "genuinely". AH was neither "appropriate" nor "genuine".
Very insightful! Thanks for sharing! 👍✨
This isn’t a real juror there’s no way…
So proud of this jury and was thrilled they were able to see and hear the truth.
I really doubt he's a real juryer
Same here. I honestly didnt care about either of them until I saw a clip of AH on the stand and I immediately said “she’s lying!”, after that I got drawn in and couldn’t believe that she did this to him! To lie about DV and then to add sexual assault on top just to make it that much worse is despicable, and she should be investigated for perjury! In the US and UK!
@@angelwings0224 yeah I got that impression too. And does anyone really think that no juror saw anything about this case on social media? 😂 I’m sure they stayed off their phones for 2 months
@@brandonc7189 Yea they released the race and ages of the jurors and this guy's voice doesn't seem to fit any of the profiles. I bet he's just looking to make a buck🙄
No they had to compromise etc, i just knew there was gonna be that ONE bitch on ambers side and i bet thats why it took so long. Amber didn’t deserve anything fuck that 2m johnny shoulda had his 25m at the least considering the gall of AH trying to counter sue for double what johnny asked.
I'm glad the jury picked up alot of what the public did following this trial.
I feel that if this trial had not been so transparent and clean the jury might have had a different outlook than the public. The fact that we the public got to see EVERYTHING was the key to both opinions being similar. I saw a lot of minds who were in the Amber camp change during the course of the trial based on evidence.... as its suppose to be.
@@Spartan1312 but by saying that you assume that everyone who followed the trial has watched the trial in its entirety, which is not true. The vast majority of people who followed it mainly got their information from youtube compilations and tiktok video’s, which were heavily swayed in Depp’s favour
@@purplefishy8164 But the trial is still there to be watched, even in the past sense. The public who did watch it got to see the legal teams argue their points and why, we got to see the jury instructions and the negotiations as to why they were worded the way they were. It is also why everything in these cases is a matter of public record. It is one of the key functions of our legal system.
@@Spartan1312 Exactly. I have said on a number of posts that after the testimonies and evidence was presented and examined... any Amber Heard supporters remaining were people that were cut from the same cloth that she is.
@@nyronfranklin5789 Or just a ideologue pushing a personal or public agenda
I TOO TOTALLY appreciate that juror's honesty - he was and did what was right!
their is zero proof this is a member of that jury.
Wow. So interesting to hear directly from a jury member about how uncomfortable it made him feel that she was so aggressively seeking eye contact. I wondered about that. Even when she's eliciting sympathy she is aggressive. She can't hide that about herself. No self insight whatsoever.
You make an excellent point that I have not heard before! Yep, aggressive at every turn. That’s really interesting too. It’s like a body language “tell”.
hiatrionic
she wanted them to react
she didnt get any reaction
and she was getting even weirder.😅
Everything she said- even her body language, when she was ‘crying’, etc. - her demeanor was ALWAYS aggressive. Noticed that right from the start. Angry and full of hate/rage too.
Yep, leave it to the Fly Guy J Depp, to slay the Goliath of that crappy me too movement!... now me too is canceled 2!
I think it is sad that she might have had a case but when I watched the trial for myself, her lawyer told AMBER to look at the Jury when she answered. I THINK BOTH Member's lawyers were not helping her case to say the least. Just my thoughts...
I commented that throughout the trial. Her spinning her head and staring at the jury EVERY TIME she responded was downright obsessive psychotic behavior. They all had to be getting uncomfortable with it. She NEVER stopped doing it. I'm glad they got weirded out by her.
Even if it was just a "No" answer.
I like the actor Depp, I am convinced he spoke the truth, and I believe Heard lied whenever she spoke.
But I would never perform any "body language analysis" with actors on the stand.
A good actor is just that - able to actively control his body language, demeanor, speech, etc.
Also, it is not needed in this case. The countless proven lies, and the convincing statements by Depp suffice, in my opinion.
BTW, I would not feel uneasy by Heard's looks. More by the assertive way she speaks.
It should be noted that all of AH witnesses did the same, so i´m guessing they were instructed to do so. That is a terrible fail from her lawyers, to not have picked up on how that was affecting the jury´s predisposition towards her. Some eye contact is a good thing. A lot of eye contact is counter-productive, because it looks made on purpose. Total fail on Elaine´s part.
Right now, Elaine is still her lawyer, spinning that the jury was "influenced". But pretty soon i expect AH to throw her lawyers under the bus, and claim she was a "victim of bad counseling". You just wait.
@@Biden_is_demented Yes she may be going down that road, especially if she decides to appeal. She would be better advised, however, to use her remaining friends (if any) to help her pay out Depp, get therapy and finally get her life in order (note I'm not saying "back in order"). And hope that no one goes after her perjury incidents....
@@Chr15T your problem is, that you are reasonable. Just stoppit.
Agree with what the juror said, glad he could see straight through her.
And we really believe this person is one of the jurors....really?
I lost a lot of hope in juries over the years but this jury gives me hope that the truth will prevail. Good over evil and justice for the innocent. Nice job jury!!
Same here
Same here.
Just out of curiosity, which jury decisions made you lose hope?
@@MentosBejeweled2 I truly marvel at whoever were those jurors who felt empathy for such a vicious beast as Heard.
😄 So satisfying to hear a juror say exactly what we were feeling. I appreciate the entire video! 🙏
I’m glad the jurors had common sense and really listened to facts of the situation.
OK but literally ANYONE could say they were a juror I would take this with a grain of salt
I was like him. I didn't really know much about Johnny Depp and Amber Heard's case until the trial began in US. I watched some of the trial videos and listened to the witnesses' testimonies and it wasn't too difficult to figure out who was the real abuser. And I hoped that Johnny would win since then. I'm glad that justice has been served!
Well said
I suppose many people watching the case have been in your position. At least this is my impression. In fact, seems to me that many actual survivors of domestic violence , not fans of both sides and keen cinema goers as mass media wanted us to believe, have followed this trial. Precisely due to the fact that this case was about a defamation resulting from an accussation of an alleged physical abuse. And yes, this is also why a response to mrs Heard and to the verdict has been so intense. Since most followers and observers of this trial were people like you, not familiar with her or her ex-husband until this very trial.
same here ... I would see posts froma FB friends about the ongoing case but chose to ingore them, though curious ( I am not really keen on people in show business) , anyway, not until days before the verdict that started to watch some of the videos and there and then, I should say, never that I sympathize with the woman.
Same here.
First and foremost, makes me happy to know they took their jobs as jurors seriously. I'm happy they took notice of everything we did...no tears from nutty Amber, she made things up as she went along, they caught on to her lie when she first said she didn't write the op-ed about Johnny then days later slipped and admitted she had. A job well done by all 7!
They did a great job!
You said it perfectly!!
It’s fake! Slow the voice down, It’s Morris the host of this channel Hes known for lying just to get views n likes
My faith in the justice system with respect to juries has been restored. After the Casey Anthony trial, I was a little worried but one would have had to be completely blind not to see how manipulative Amber Turd is, right down to staring at the jury during testimony. It was quite obviously an attempt to play to, manipulate the jury rather than an effort to connect with them. Thank you, sir.
Actually, if that case had been done on “lawtube”, I think the media spun bias would have prepared people for “not guilty”. I had served on a jury and watched that trial similar to how the jury was hearing things. AND right away, I said “not guilty” for murder. At no time did the prosecutor connect Casey to the body of her child. And the whole family came off as shady people. Dad looked suspicious and came off as lying on the stand… and of course, Casey never took the stand to witness her in a examination or cross.
Also, Jose, her attny, was amazing to the jury. The judge and prosecutor being over the top “acting tough”, played ok to the cameras, but a jury wouldn’t like that crap.
I was Never surprised by the verdict- especially because they went overboard and tried to add a death penalty. Hard to kill a young woman who shows up and can cry in court at times.
You are so ignorant 🤣. Justice system is as fucked as before you just changed ur whole opinion after 1 trial including famous and rich people televized to the public
Why? Nothing will end up happening to her. She will not pay one red cent.
@@marsoblivi0n945 perjury charges would be something….
The Casey Anthony jury was not well informed of what their job was. I remember one juror who said the prosecution couldn't prove the manner of death so she walked. The instructions they received were terrible.
yall really let this guy trick you into thinking its an actual juror huh?
It's really good to hear that her bs acting didn't fool the jury, they say what the rest of the world saw. I thought being in the court room may have impacted the jury differently. Much respect for the judge and jury having to sit through this.
facts
The irony in all this is that AH is supposed to be an actress. Yet she couldn’t act well enough save her own case.
It was probably more obvious in the court room, unedited… she can’t keep the act up every second…
Being a female it infuriates me when women like Amber lie about abuse, which hurts women who really suffered. Sometime ago, I watched that tape, and listened to how cruel she is, and how she volunteered that she would smack Johnny around. These two were so toxic around each other, and they knew this before the marriage! Amber kept speaking about how she loved Johnny, she hasn't a clue what love is, sadly Johnny doesn't either. The settlement the jury came up with sounds fair, looks like in the end they will both break even.
Agree with you.
I don't know about that. He has a good relationship with and says he loves his children. He may not know how to a balance a relationship with work yet was married for a number of years and sounded fairly level headed and compassionate on the audio tapes when he was trying to problem solve with AH.
Yeah my wife was abused by parents that were both narcissists. But AH is one of the worst I’ve seen. And she could tell right away who was the abuser. I worry about her new baby child and what it will be like behind closed doors.
@@themisfit9465 I hope that child won’t be abused, but I’m hopeful that any nanny or teachers of that kid would pay attention and make sure there’s nothing amiss.
I think she brought out toxicity from him that he’d maybe never expressed before. I could see him being a jealous partner but not abusive or aggressive
Can this be proven? Anybody can claim they were part of the jury since they were anonymous.
What rubbish - and dangerous to JD's result. Prove this"juror" is real!
Sounds like a fair and intelligent guy.
In fact, from what he said the jury took their job seriously and the outcome was just and balanced.
"You go before a judge and jury and tell them you're a victim of abuse, see if they believe you!" Well, he did, and they did.
Yes!!! 💜
The Jurors got it right❤
Amen
Her staring at them was an attempt at intimidation imo. The fact that she also made at least him, and probably others feel HIGHLY uncomfortable says a lot about how she projects herself tbh.
I think it might have also been a manipulative thing she does with men.....She's probably used to getting her way with men.
Witnesses are often advised to look at the jury, to connect.
But like everything else she way overdid it .
It was almost comical, the level of exaggeration,if not such a serious matter.
Her energy was so bad I could hardly watch much less listen to her via TV. Hard to believe anyone is comfortable around that!
@@peaceblossom5852 Same !
Whatever day it was toward the end of the trial , when she kept staring directly into the camera ...I had to put a post it note over her face on the screen . So creepy!
@@peaceblossom5852 I agree. I was watching just the court feed until she got on the stand. I had to watch Emily Baker while she was on because it just made me ill... I needed some other energy to counteract it.
Take this content with a grain of salt because we have absolutely no way to verify that this is an actual jury member speaking out
CONCORDO ISSO PODE SER UMA ARMADILHA QQ PESSOA SE PASSANDO POR JURI
Elon Musk has to know who they really are, and have to be true that this man is a jury, on internet they are saying that was a reason for Johnny Depp for not look Amber H on her eyes🤔 a weird thing about that, So what this man is saying about the look is a confirmation Plus the Jury (all of them) on the ending was not looking at her at all, they were avoiding her🤔
It's totally fake news....In my Trump voice😂😂😂😂😂
@Peace Maker That is not a juror...are you so easy to believe anything.? People, don't be like lost sheep
@@ednadunham8892 They can't help it. People are gullible as fuck!
Funny how Johnny's guilty of his lawyer's statements but Amber was dodging all responsibility for what her camp did.
She is literally bat 💩 crazy. So in her mind, Johnny can’t have an opinion in the public only Amber can? He should lose millions and she should be rewarded and the fact that her attorneys are doubling down and trying to call out the jurors and the legal system is equally crazy. I originally kind of felt sorry for her attorneys having to deal with Amber but now I don’t. Dig in deeper Elaine, you are out of your depth.
I still don't agree with how they could find both were guilty of defaming each other. if they believed that Amber did indeed defame Johnny with a hoax, then what Johnny's lawyer said wasn't Defamation and didn't have malice as he believed it. doesn't make sense
@@Heybrotruthhurts Right. And the jury did that as a compromise with the slowest juror.
@@Heybrotruthhurts I totally agree.....not to mention that Johnny didn't even say it---his lawyer did! So how can she sue Johnny Depp for it? Just seems like she'd have to sue the lawyer. Makes no sense!
@@SadieMarie108 I think it was because he was Johnny's lawyer before he was pulled off the team for publishing that article. The association was enough to have a degree of defamation
Yes ! I'm so glad to hear a juror saying that Amber staring at them when answering questions made them uncomfortable. It was so phony. I'm sure someone told her to make eye contact so they will believe you. Instead it was just creepy. The jury just like everyone else saw through her lies.
She was probably trying to "flirt" with him to win him over. Glad he didn't fall for it.
One jury did liked Turd staring at them, she/he feels important!
I am so happy that the Jury saw right through Amber's BS. Thank you to all the jurists and the time they took to give Johnny's life back to him. 💗💗💗
How do they know it was a legit jury member? 🤔
Exactly! For all we know this is the content creator!
We don’t. I have questions.
I am hoping all the real jurs stay quiet for the 21 days as to not cause a mistrail or mess somethung up after all this hard work!
@@ChelseaNae what 21days ? I don't recall hearing that. However, I think this person is probably a fraud anyway.
Is definitely not a jury member. Definitely team AH to have a legitimate right of appeal. After 21 days probably they will speak.
Thank you for bringing us this gem. Amber is found to be lying about everything and she comes out of court saying, "I let women down". Really?
Well she did let women down just not in the way she thinks
The only people she let down are real DV victims and herself. She really is a piece of work to think she can get away with her lies. Shame on her
Elaine, straight-up, insults the integrity of the jury---improper as heck.
Well she took amber as a client , are you surprised? She’s a dirty lawyer and we could all feel that she doesn’t even believe in her client . A loss for women would mean a win for amber .
Glad to hear from the jurors. That proves that Elaine's statement trying to portray them as confused and stupid is inaccurate and condescending. We all got it right
The only thing that was confused and stupid was compromising and finding that Johnny defamed Amber. That was illegal. Each is supposed to give their own vote, not compromise.
@@genxx2724 one of the jurors was stubborn about that. Probably also the one that voted for the 2million that's given to Scamber.
Elaine even argued with the Judge throughout the weeks........ Idk why she's still working she should've been disbarred or retire with cats as her only companions.
@@MollyHJohns That’s fine. They were required to report that they were deadlocked. If the judge determined that they could not reach a unanimous verdict, there would have been a mistrial on Amber’s case rather than Johnny being found liable and having to pay $2 million. All are required to agree, NOT COMPROMISE.
@@MollyHJohns i actually think it was good strategy to give Amber 2 million. The second statement from Waldman is the weakest among 3 due to lack of evidence. They awarded her 2 million, it will make it harder for her to appeal because in a way she "won" proving one statement to be defamatory towards her. So why appeal if you won?
If you can't verify this is a real juror you shouldn't be giving them any airtime.
Thank God for intelligent jurors selected for the trial. You all made history that day.
i am always amazed at how smart jurors are. this man sounds very real,very truthful and duty bound. great juror.
Just remember any one of us at any time can be summoned to sit on a jury. It could be your next door neighbor, your co-worker, store cashier. We all have a duty to serve when asked to do so.
You actually think this is an actual juror 🤣 on tik tok ffs, if any juror speaks out which i doubt it wont be on fucking tik tok,think about it for more than a second 🤔
@@markprince1671 why would it not be on tiktok? These are normal people.
@@arjunts7646 bcuz tik toks for idiots,thats the point
I’m so glad that we were able to hear a jurors point of view. Thank you.
We don't even kno if that's a real juror
@@robroy7494 I was thinking that also. What prove is there?
This “juror” could be anyone. No way to prove. The info/ answers seem like BS.
i agree and something about the use of “lol” and “bs” from this juror’s answers raises an eyebrow 🤨
I agree, this doesn't sound legit at all.
Download the audio and speed up a little in any sound editing app. It sounds like Mr Morris' voice. It's another Joseph Morris scam.
ITS FAKE! The host of this channel did it He is KNOWN FOR LYING to get views & likes
JOSEPH MORRIS DID THIS HIMSELF ITS FAKE & NOT A JUROR DONT LET HIM INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE 🤬😡🤬😡
So much for Elaine’s theory that social media MUST have affected every juror & that they all must have looked at it since they weren’t sequestered. If even most juror behaved like this one then they came to their verdict based on evidence & common sense alone-as it should be. Amber lost because she deserved to.
If I were a juror, there is no way in hell I would have looked at the net and risked a mistrial. It would have been too important to just focus on the facts, evidence and blatant lies coming out in court.
@@beautifulangel5627 Yep & most jurors i'm aware of in my lifetime take it very seriously.
I love this juror, he's saying exactly what I thought
Which means you could have said you were a juror too and replied the same way. We still cannot be sure about this person being member of the jury.
@@doicounttoo6861 I think he sound like one of the jury so maybe he actually is
@@E.A what 🤣 what in this video did you here or see anything that proves they're real Jury members. This is just a guy trying make money
@@Simlife101 i agree. The judge said the jurors are not allowed to talk about the case for a year.
@@daisysfield5456 not true. She approved protection if they wanted anonymity, but they have full freedom to talk if they want.
I feel that the jury's decision was a victory for all domestic violence victims. I hope more men who suffer at the hands of their abusers will come forward.
The case wasn't about domestic violence. It was a defamation case.
@@WILLYLYNCH. Legally, yes, but it became a platform for DV victims
SAME.. I watched my mother abused My Sweet Daddy for most of my life and she still does. Amber Heard reminds me of my mother when she was younger
@@WILLYLYNCH. defamation case based on domestic violence... so....
I feel so too. And not only domestic violence. any kind of abuse, in any environment and from all sorts of people. And poor Amber, she dug her hole VERY deep with those sneaky recordings.
How do we know that this person was actually a jury member?
He’s not legit. (That lawyer you know, YT) he used an LA County Juror badge
@@kpcali3348 great find this video is worthless lmao
Thank you to this juror. We appreciate your willingness to speak. I wonder if you were angry when Elaine said, the juror’s are “liars, cheaters and that every juror was biased from watching social media. I will say Elaine openly lied during the trial and on the interviews today. The men and women that have gone through dv become very attuned to the voice of the abuser.
Thank you for serving.
Elaine continues to defame Johnny Depp!
It’s really good to know how he felt about all her eye contact and basically glaring at them! It would be strange due to the fact that you can’t verbally respond to a person looking and speaking at you like that! 🤔
The juror sounds like they could see through Heard's maliciousness and lies! I only hope that with his honesty and the statements about the jury not being unanimous in the settlement amount gives Amber any ammunition in her hunt for an appeal, which should be denied the second it's filed since she's wasted enough of the courts time with her lies! The next time I want to see her in court again is hopefully when she has to answer for committing perjury under oath and filing false reports she made to the police and a TRO where she had to sign the report as true under penalty of perjury!
Yeah and she’s in big trouble with Australia for lying about her dogs, so she’s gonna have to face that matter she might get jail time and fines.
@@Harl-pic also about the "glassing" incident, not sure what the statute of limitations are on that but it is now public record in America that she used a bottle in an assault which is illegal in Australia.
I hope she loses custody of her innocent daughter before she becomes her next victim
It has zero to do with an appeal. The jury was unanimous. That is why each one had to stand up and affirm they support the verdict the foreman read. There will be no successful appeal here. Elaine is running her mouth in ways that will likely get her disbarred like a trumper attorney. She is attacking the judge and jury with baseless accusations. I also think the early speculation that elaine is dating amber must be true, elaine is acting like a girlfriend on tv, not an attorney who submitted tons of false evidence in a trial. Elaine should be distancing, not doubling down.
Isn’t that the truth, Whitney will be her punching bag.
How exactly did you "confirm" that it's a juror?...
Must be satisfying for him to know the general public also saw what he felt about Amber. Confirmation that their gut was right.
Good point! It’s always nice to be validated.
As a survivor of DV initially, I thought (pre-trial) J.D. was guilty of what A.H. said about him. . I watched him and very quickly changed my mind. I know what it means to be pushed and taunted to the point of almost breaking down. I have lived his words and have no doubt he was the one being abused.
I don't have first hand experience with DV but I've seen many survivors also comment that no legitimate DV victim would be physically chasing after their abuser trying to prevent him from leaving an argument, and speaking so aggressively and tauntingly to him. Every comment from these survivors pointed out that when you're the victim, you're walking on eggshells, keeping your head down, etc.--because you're AFRAID of your abuser--you don't hunt them down and get in their face and refuse to let them leave. That is what abusers do, not victims. Which made a lot of sense to me.
Same. As a dv survivor I wouldn't chase him to talk. I actually withdrew and would hide in the bathroom. Even 10+ years later I cannot look people in the eye as I tell about what I went through unlike AH. I also wouldn't have been snappy with Camilles questioning. I would've blubbered and started to cry. I still flinch and get meek when someone raises their voice or their tone changes or they all of a sudden stand up. So I can't fathom by any means how she can say she's a victim of dv when she comes off as the aggressor.
An clearly wanted to clear his name
AH is not finished yet she is dangerous, cunning, coniving and cannot be trusted. She should be committed to a Mental Health Hospital.
@@horsepanther I'm another DV survivor and can confirm, none of her testimony or 'evidence' made ANY sense to me at all, while JD's was all VERY relatable. TBH a massive one for me was listening to the tapes SHE recorded secretly and SHE chose to submit. They were so triggering and opened us up to literally hear JD, his words, his tone, everything, while living through DV. I can not even get my head around how she could imagine they showed her as a victim not a perpetrator. It was huge in demonstrating how deluded she is, as well as how manipulative, aggressive, and persistent in her abuse. I was literally told by a doctor to walk away and take a moment whenever I felt overwhelmed but I would be followed and prevented from taking even a moment. It really brought that back up hearing him trying to walk away but being pursued relentlessly and mocked for needing to escape.
Amber made her bed of lies now she has to live with them , I thought it was pretty awful what she wrote on Twitter right after about dv she should be ashamed of herself .
She made her bed of lies and where she lies with her poo too! 😄
But, as a narcissist, she isnt.
Bed full of sh*t
That’ll never happen. Until she’s put in the slammer, that thing will NEVER stop!
People like amber never experience shame. They are so self centered.
Debunked by the Court guy. He is not the real juror.
AH's assertion that "pledged" and "donated" were interchangeable words settled it for me, not only because it spoke volumes about her relationship with the concept of "truth" but also because it demonstrated a scheming nature, i.e. her willingness to lie on-camera in an effort to feed the media material designed to manipulate public opinion in her favour.
It was worse that AH tried to compare it to buying a house! Lol 😆
Such a good point and so true! People might be able to fabricate or embellish here or there to a small extent and it doesn't mean that you are skeptical of everything they say... But with Amber, she told enough bald face lies, and as you alluded to, made it obvious how sinister she was, that you simply couldn't believe anything that came out of her mouth...
She is a despicable person, and that's what typically manifests when you are as disordered, clinically, as she is. Btw I think she likely has NPD as well, FWIW...
Plus the testimony by JD's accountant explaining that he on his own took the initiative to send the first installments directly to the charities and AH's lawyers ordered him to pay her instead. If her goal was truly to send that money to the charities there was no legitimate reason to waste time by adding extra steps in the process.
And her saying that the trial forced her to delay those payments while she had all the money on her account for more than one full year before she published the article that caused the trial. She's justifying a misdeed based on unforeseeable events that happened way later. That's another hint at her relation to the truth. She has zero issue with reordering a timeline over several months or years just to sell her narrative.
Yes, and as it turned out also being abused and being the abuser is interchangeable for her.
I’m really proud of the jury. The had an incredibly difficult task. Knowing that this was such a huge case and it was in their hands must have been a little intimidating. I hope they’re all returning to their lives and getting some much deserved rest/relaxation. I hope the public continues to respect their decision and their choice to either speak out or not speak out. If any of them are reading this, kudos to you! It could not have been easy to sit in the courtroom that entire trial.
The reason why everyone is talking about this case is because someone lied without any proof or evidence & people didn’t question it. Plz don’t let the host of this channel fool you. He put this out himself for views & likes & donations He has done this before with Gabby patito case & was caught out. Don’t let him insult your intelligence before you look into this. He is no better than Amber Turd & her lies. Think before you believe everything you hear. 😡🤬😡🤬
So disappointed in Amber’s attorney. I was really feeling so I for her but now I realize she speaks just like Amber. Why couldn’t she be honest! Doesn’t she know people can fact check all these things that she is saying about the UK trial
We can't stand Amber Heard here in the UK. Johnny is being congratulated everywhere he goes here !!.
Birds of a feather..... 😒 Elaine can't take any responsibility nor will she stop!!! Both woman can't and won't let go!
Elaine will go to her grave insisting she was wronged by everyone in this case.
How about looking in the mirror and right next to you, Elaaaaaiiiiiiiiiinnnneeee?! 😜😏
The reason AH's attorney Elaine, acts like AH is that Elaine is actually AH's mother. Just kidding.
@@ginger19431 You are welcome xx
@Angie my sentiments exactly
Don't think so. They have all been advised not to speak out for 21days. Not credible. 🤬
Agreed.. thank you!
Fascinating. I’m really impressed at how fair and rational his answers were.
I’ve been on a high profile jury, although not nearly as high as this one, and it didn’t last as long, thankfully. But I really feel for the jurors because it’s incredibly stressful to do that and try to make sure that you get it right. It’s a really heavy weight to carry because you’re messing with people’s lives, and you really don’t want to make a mistake. After my case finished, both sides were instructed to not contact us for a certain amount of time, and one side actually violated it the day after the trial ended.
I served as a juror back in 2006. Not even close to a high profile case but it was a criminal case. Older woman in her late 50’s selling drugs to an undercover drug police task force trying to go after the bigger fish. We didn’t have the entire evidence because they were going after a bigger fish still. Defense counsel was trying to paint a older grandmother trying to get by in life. But in the end all of us unanimously had her guilty. We told her defense counsel the reason was that all he tried to do was get evidence thrown out via tampering or not handle properly. They never tried to say she wasn’t selling drugs.
oh my, what did they say?
You're a liar on the internet, Kathrin. I have been on every high profile jury in America and I never saw you once. Stop fibbing and get a life
@@kimberleywilliams7802 "get gud dude"
@@kimberleywilliams7802 "Thank you, here's the money we promised"
This trial was fraught with so many complications throughout but at the same time, several red flags went up on the AH side like the donation/pledge thing, the same picture in two versions of colors, her obviously sudden changes of emotions on stand etc etc. Guess those were what made it easier for the jurors to arrive at their conclusions.
Well done, Jurors, immense thanks to you all for investing so much time, patience and sacrifice for this case.
The jury, couldn't you just hug and kiss the lot of them, well done 👍
She thinks Punching and hitting are different, as she said i'm not punching you, i'm hitting you. But pledge and donate are the same in her dictionary.
Also her accidentally admitting in fit of rage that it was indeed about Johnny
@@InfiniteTriztan1111 it’s always what benefits her the best
@@InfiniteTriztan1111 Exactly. But they have to spi. Their own narrative, being what they are, client and attorneys all being the same.
*ATTENTION *
I just want to make people aware that this guy has a history of giving false information for views and posting corpses in thumbnails apparently.
Another youtuber has mentioned if you slow down his voice it sounds a hell of a lot like the " Jurors ."
This can be Extremely damaging for Johnny Depp.
So please don't take this as fact.
JOSEPH MORRIS DID THIS HIMSELF ITS FAKE & NOT A JUROR DONT LET HIM INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE 🤬😡🤬😡
🙏🏽🙏🏽 I still can’t find the link to the “juror’s” TikTok
@@marshe2009 That’s because Joseph Morris has took it down cuz he knows hes been caught out lying AGAIN
Also I hardly believe the juror would call amber a "crazy" woman on his post so soon / if ever after the trial ..although we all know she def is crazy but for juror to say that, IS a bad move, considering it can possibly be brought back up to the courts,and may try lookin to get it reversed on mistrial grounds, if that's actually a thing In civil court. 🤔.. Just sayin ......... It can havr a strong motion to act on during appeals ..
Sounds like bull****
And I don't think a real jury member would be in much of a rush to examine the trial on social media.
Love hearing from a Juror and their thoughts. Hopefully we will hear more.
This was awesome 👏🏻 to hear the jury member talk about it. This jury gives me faith in our justice system, which I at times have thought it unjust! This Jury was amazing, very intelligent, and did the right thing!
I have seen men get beat down by certain women! I have witnessed a woman (an ex-friend) accuse a man of date rape, and it was a total LIE. She was married, but would hang out at the bar, and totally set her sights on a certain guy. Weekend after weekend she flirted, and then finally got him to sleep with her. We were all there! When it was time to go, she refused to go home. Me and my husband tried to get to go, but she wouldn’t. She was drunk, but not to the point of oblivion. Well, after that night, he wasn’t looking for a relationship with her, and she didn’t like that, so she claimed date rape about a week later after she admitted to an affair to her husband. They both came up with this story to justify her actions I guess. Luckily, all of us witnesses that knew that to not be the case told her if she went to authorities with that story, we would come forward and tell them it’s NOT TRUE. Since then we are no longer friends, but I wasn’t about to let her ruin some guys life with her out right LIE!!!!!
It’s disgusting what some women have done to these innocent men!! Amber is still lying! Amber claimed every credible witness was a liar, now she is claiming the Jury was wrong, because she is a typical narcissistic ass hole!
I commend you for defending that innocent man, thank you. You did right and her actions on all counts indicated to you it was time to go NC. Some women are disgusting just like AH - from the moment I heard she defecated in JD's bed and the account she spun I knew things would go downhill for her and they did - her credibility on all fronts remained questionable.
I saw a story some guy put out there. He looked to be mid-thirties, fit, decent looking, had a house with land, horses, truck, etc... He meets a chick on the internet. They converse over a period of time. Pretty soon, she comes over in a mini skirt, too much make-up, long hair. One thing leads to another and they have sex. She decides she doesn't want to leave. At all. He would like for her to leave. Point of contention... She stays a couple of days. He still wants her to leave but she refuses. He's beginning to really dislike her. He's in and out of the house, going about his business on the land. Finally he throws her out after several more days. She cries rape.
Just found out about 2 months ago my mom did this to a man when I was a kid. She dated him and then “left him” claimed he broke into our home and raped her. Well she’s been married/divorced in the time in between and STARTED DATING HIM AGAIN YEARS LATER. SHE ADMITTED SHE ACCUSED HIM BUT HE DIDNT!!! 🤯🤯🤯 We don’t really get along great anyway but this was another level. Hurt me because I’ve been SAed twice. It’s not something you lie about!!! SMH.
I know a woman who flaunted her sexuality quite a lot, and was quite open about being into BDSM. She had a sexual relationship with a man who she had a violent, BDSM sexual relationship with, and often obtained visible bruises by this ... activity.. bruises she photographed and posted to social media, and bragged about. The man then got cross with her, and ended the relationship because he felt embarrassed about the intimate details of their sexual relationship being broadcasted to an audience. She then felt very hurt by his reaction, and claimed that it was sexual abuse. The man was an asshole, he was a radical left winged communist type of man and had a lot of sexual affairs with a lot of women while ina relationship with a woman who knew nothing, while everyone else knew. But, she was a cunt too. He was an asshole, however, she was not a victim of his.
Still, I understand her perpsective also. Because I think this free love mentality, this freedom of sex without commitment isn't necessarily such a great thing. To be honest, I have too been caught in this web, as a single woman I have too often engaged sexually with men, because of some hope that he might fall in love and want a relationship. Because the man says that he needs a sexual relationship to fall in love, or that he doesn't know if he wants a relationship unless he has sex. So I have concented under false premises, so off course I end up being hurt. I have concented to have sex with men who has no obligation to me, no sence of responsibily or care about my value as a human being. Off course it has been rough on my mental and emotional health. So I understand her, but it's such a grey area. I understand how many women wants to retract their concent, but legally that's like.. How??!? I think there is too much chaos, obscurity and confusion about sexual relationships. Once you open the door towards sex, you let in all the force of nature. And nature is bunnyrabbits and rainbows and flowers and butterflies and bees, but it's also wasps, bears and siberian tigers which will sting, hurt and devour you.. so.. our culture has failed the young generation in guidance about sex, I think.
And I don't think that sex, in an evolutionary and historical sence can ever be described as being without commitment, at least not to women. Sex is wonderful and awful, sex is life, pregnancy, babies and life long commitment, and also even death and disease and grief and trauma.. I don't think our culture is very good at having an honest discussion about sex.
Now, I am much more concervative. I tell men "the intimate aspects of my being i secretive, my sexuality is of such value to me that I do not share it with anyone, without that person feeling love and obligation towards me. God loves me, a lot. And i cannot allow anyone to treat me in a way which dishonours Gods love towards me." And I think that kind of personal responsibility is what will solve a lot of the issues and power imbalances inbetween men and women.
And also, I really do not like it when people speak openly about intimate details about their sexual lives with me. I hate it. They feel incredibly rightouss about being able to flaunt their sexuality, but in doing so they completely disregard me. They don't know me or my sexual history. They don't know whether or not I have a traumatic sexual history, which makes it impossible for me to participate in such conversation. Or how I feel about my own intimate being, I feel protective of my intimate being. So, I think that it is important to protect each other from our selves, we protect each other from our sexuality. My sexuality is not something I can expect other people to want to participate in, so i protect people from myselfe in that regard. By keeping it to my selfe, and dress and act proper. I don't like it when people flaunt their sexuality towards me, it makes me anxious and sad.
Good deed of calling your friend out
Unless thoroughly vetted there is NO WAY of knowing if this is really a juror.
Discerment people.
Exactly. I don't think it is.
JOSEPH MORRIS DID THIS HIMSELF ITS FAKE & NOT A JUROR DONT LET HIM INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE 🤬😡🤬😡
don´t let yourself get fooled - there is no confirmation that this is an actual juror!!!
Would love to believe this was actually from a juror, unfortunately I'm a skeptic and would need some sort of proof without knowing their personal information.
My initial reaction too. I think anyone who watched the trial beginning to end could equally answer these questions.
I watched the entire trial. Amber Heard actually did shed a tear once or twice. HOWEVER, the times when she shed the tears were just when she was talking about her sadness about her marriage failing and the wedding dress she had just gotten. She never shed a tear, and was obviously fake crying, every single time she spoke about the supposed "abuse".
I watched it all...and she shed not cry
No tears shed. Only photoshopped on click bait
I just rewatched it also. And I did actually see a tiny bit of tears at the end of her SA story in Australia. You can see a little bit on the outside of her left eye. I honestly think she probably kept on trying over and over and over to cry and that's all that would come out. Cuz if she was really crying she would have tears streaming down her face. Pretty pathetic right?
nah no tears, she squeezed her face so hard it went red, but no tear
Actually I have to agree with you. I did notice she had a moment of actual tears running down her face but it was not about the abuse but her pain of losing Johnny Depp and the hell she put him through. I felt her one time tears came from a different emotion that she pushed herself to cry.
I hope he's careful with what he's saying bc her lawyers will be watching and waiting for one to say something that would cause misconduct and appeal.
That's what I thought.
Judge Penny said they could speak to the media if they wanted to but thier names old not be published for a year
Agree . So if he's watching Please jury guy don't say to much and plz don't answer any questions that could be misconstrued.
Someone dm him and tell him that!
I’ve already left a comment on something he said in comments that he needs to delete!
You do know that this could be anybody... somebody playing jokes. Do you verify or even try to verify ANYTHING?????
Thanks for this video. There was great questions for this anonymous juror They got it right from what they were given to work with in making a decision. I'm happy for Johnny that he won his case. The damages and proof of those damages (physical, emotional, and financial abuse were the damages HE suffered from Ms. Heard.) This is a victory for justice, which means a lot to me.
I'm so pleased such an unbiased, fair, intelligent guy was on that jury. It sounds like most of the jury were pretty much in agreement.
Except the moron who felt Depp defamed Amber as well. Even if he did, there was no consequence to her. She didn't lose any rolls over that. She's only losing rolls now that all this shit came out in the trail and all the fans have been demanding she get cut. That stupid statement from his attorney or agent, FFS was inconsequential. But apparently at least one METOO'er was on the jury and so HAD to at least throw AH a bone.
But all in all a huge win, and I am very thankful.
@@cryptojihadi265 for me i think that made it more realistic. Imagine the scepticism if the whole jury would have been completely 100% Johnny's side. People would call them to be biased and say verdict was bought by JD and what not.
I'm skeptical, I understand wanting to stay anonymous. We have no way of knowing though if this WAS an actual juror. So take it with a grain of salt.
a lot of the men in the jury were said to be of asian descent. he speaks with a faint accent like he is bilingual asian american. i am half korean and i can verify the accent
@@CarlyleKayla are you joking? He had no accent whatsoever beyond sounding like a typical American native English speaker
@@CarlyleKayla he had an accent so he must be a real juror!
That's what I was wondering. I appreciate the effort and time of the jurors but how do we know this guy is real?
@@autumnburton2091 respectfully, if yoy are not of asian descent, you probably can't hear it. it's very faint.
Why would a legit juror out themselves on TikTok? This sounds like a scam and we need to be careful because this could compromise the case. Also what Elaine is doing by throwing the jury under the bus and saying they were influenced by social media is despicable! It totally undermines the system in which she is licensed to practice law.
This happened after the OJ trial. It doesn't matter tbh. One of them wrote a book IIRC. Heard + EB are evil though and went after the nurse's license and reported her "former friend" to the IRS. I wouldn't out myself until after her appeals were exhausted but maybe the guy or gal is judgment proof. Who knows if this is real tho.
The only person who mentioned media was Amber who complained about hate comment on social media while on the stand!!! This is team loco!!!
Elaine is not undermining the system. She is destroying her credibility as a lawyer. Everyone knows that a jury is not allowed to consider any media while they are jurying.
Same thing I thought I don’t believe this I think it’s scam
No juror would do this.
How do we know this really is a jury member.
Haha, that was my exact thoughts while watching it, how incredibly annyoing it must have been to have her constantly turning and talking to you instead of the person asking the question. I think I also would have just looked away after a while..
If it is a trial by judge, folks are told to speak to the judge. If it is a trial by jury, folks are told to talk to the jury. It is the jury one must convince. If someone was making a case to you for their own point of view, how would it feel if they looked everywhere except at you? Not very convincing in that context.
@@mrbob4u495 Well I would answer the person asking the question ,namely the lawyer , like EVERY other person did through the course of the trial.
@@mrbob4u495 if you have to explain something then yes look at the jury, if you say "that's correct" why would you need to face the jury it just makes you creepy.
"What a crazy woman." That sent me.😂 Amber worked so hard to hide it, yet the jury had her pegged all along. You can't hide crazy, at least not for long.🤷
She’s mentally unwell.
I dated someone a few years ago that hid their crazy for 7 months before it all came out ...they couldn't hold it in any longer!!
She probably thought she had it by looking at the juror whenever she was answering attorneys as they asked her questions...pompous!
How can you stay anonymous when then account can be linked back to you. You also have to be quiet after so long after the trial
Wow! THANK you! And thank you to that juror! My heart went out to all of you!
Thank you so much for your Service on the Trial. I know it was a long 6 weeks for all of you and I appreciated everyone of you and your answers. I'm glad you could see her as BS as the rest of the world did. Thank you all for giving Johnny his life back he deserves it. God bless 🙏
Being a juror is already an intimidating task. Imagine the person getting sued continuously staring at you while talking. It'd feel like a subtle threat/warning. Good on the jurors for 💯 obliterating her.
The jurors aren't allowed to speak out at this point of time.
FAKE NEWS Don’t trust this host he is KNOWN for lying just for views & likes
exactly. That's what i was always saying. Her staring at them, esp when she'd drink her drink and cut her eyes at them, she looked intimidating. Like she wants to boss on them to do right by her. It was bad
How do you know for a FACT that this person is a legit jury member? It could be anyone claiming to be a juror, when they had nothing to do with the trial. It could even be someone from Amber's team trying to get a mistrial.
They showed their Juror Badge on their tiktok page.
There can't be a mistrial the case is over & the jury is free to give their opinion but if this was done during the trial then yes.
JOSEPH MORRIS DID THIS HIMSELF ITS FAKE & NOT A JUROR DONT LET HIM INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE 🤬😡🤬😡
Exactly. But yet people believe this crap. Jury won't speak out for awhile. The trial isn't over, as such yet anyway
The case isn't over at all
They have to meet to discuss certain things. Numerous lawyers have stated not to speak to these people incase they are members of AH team. They are citing social media for grounds of appeal, then like magic, jurors pop up speaking. Yeah right