Synergetic Carbon Neutral Fuels: Pathway Delivering Net Zero Synthetic Fuel by Dan Sutton @ TEAC12

SYNERGETIC CARBON NEUTRAL FUELS - Novel Thermal-Power-to-Hydrogen Pathway Delivering Net Zero Synthetic Fuel at Lower Cost than Fossil Equivalents synergetic.world/
Fossil hydrocarbons represent $7 Trillion in consumption per year.
Electricity alone cannot economically power:
mining and refining cement production
steel production
chemical production
heavy industrial manufacturing
aviation
marine transport
hydrogen production
Nuclear powered fuel synthesis: the path to net zero hydrocarbon abundance:
don't refine down, synthesize up
electrolysis + carbon capture + chemical synthesis =
future fuel: hydrogen
future fuel: ammonia
fuel for today: net zero synthetic hydrocarbons
synergetic.world/
thoriumenergya...
ThoriumRemix.com/ Thorium & MSR & Nuclear assets used in Thorium Remix project.

[@EscarolaSpeculator]

This presentation was very interesting. Thank you for sharing it.

[@GreezyWorks]

Since CO2 is only 0.04% of atmosphere, another option is to outsource the job of direct air capture to trees, then harvest, grind and let fungi eat the lignin in bio-reactors, then use the produced CO2 as feedstock.

[@GreezyWorks]

Captain of Industry in real life.

[@stevefisher3280]

Interesting that he’s talking about ammonia as a store for hydrogen. If you react CO2 with hydrogen it is exothermic to produce methane CH4. Don’t understand why more people are not talking about this as an option.

[@nolan4339]

I would love to see a cost comparison analysis of pairing e-fuels with nuclear vs various renewables.

[@chapter4travels]

I would take this technology to Africa where they have an abundance of cheap carbon (coal) and a HUGE desire for prosperity and abundance. African countries would do anything to help you while Western countries will do anything to stop you.

[@toddmarshall416]

The carbon boogy man is nonsense. Thorium makes sense because it's cheap and safe... and rocks are inexhaustable.

[@jshellenberger7876]

#po #po-w #% #kundun #king

[@stanmitchell3375]

There is a limit of nuclear fuel supply, needs breeders

[@chapter4travels]

With simple liquid fuel reactors, breeders won't be needed for a few hundred thousand years. Regardless, breeders make so much sense and are not much more difficult to do, so why not. Right now reactors are designed to satisfy the regulator as the customer, a hostile, asshole customer. This needs to change.

[@WJV9]

Thorium is abundant and can be converted to U233 in MSR reactor.