D415の方が綺麗に見えるのは面白いですね！ 野外で使えるというのがどの程度使えるのか、知りたいです！（届くのは数ヶ月後になりそうなので･･･） It is interesting that D415 looks better than D435. I would like to see an outdoor test. ;)
From his point of few, D435 is standing on the left side and D415 on the right (1:24). This could support the hint of Kazuyuki that he actually swooped image streams. You can see the difference in the position of the ceiling lamps. On the left image they are more centered and on the right they are a little bit shifted to the left. So the video on the right is probably the D435 and not the D415...
Naa, I disagree. At 1:24 you can see, that the D415 (from his point of view on the right) is actually tilted a bit more towards the ceiling. Also the D415 has a narrower field of view, which results in objects of same distance appearing to be closer to the camera compared to the D435. If you compare the camera footage, this leads to the conclusion that the image stream on the right is actually the D415. (Like the titles of the image stream windows say D414 on the right and D435 on the left). So in terms of RGB video quality and sharpness, the D415 (rolling shutter) seems to be better than the D435 (global shutter).
It is because the 435 prioritises FOV over accuracy. realsense.intel.com/compare/ I am noticing that the 435 seems to have less noise in this video than the 415 though. Which is odd because intel states that the 435 typically has twice the noise that the 415 does. "The Intel RealSense D435 depth camera has more depth noise (>2x) at any given range compared to the Intel RealSense D415 depth camera, and it does have a smaller minimum operation distance (~0.5x) at the same resolution"
@@LukeWelles Strange since its cheaper. Which one is recommended for Windows Hello use and maybe some kinect like gesture control if there are any programs that do it. I wonder if one of these can be installed below big 43inch monitor or 55inch TV, facing towards TV and somehow use it to detect touches and turning TVs into big touch screen
Hi Satoshi, I have a D415 camera and I want to buy a D435 because the Intel web site said D435 is better for fast motion tracking. But according to your video, I find D415 performs better. Do you feel the same? I need your advice to decide to buy a D435 or not. Thanks!
Hello Satoshi, Nice video to get an idea of their depth stream. Are you running default settings on both cameras, in the SDK depth viewer tool ? Could you give an estimate of how close and far (the distance in meters) you were pacing with respect to the camera? The D415 seems to do slightly better in near range even though D435 is supposed to have a slightly better range. Your response would be really helpful!
So, basically, they now use a different raster than R200 did. Frankly, after some disappointing experience with previous models, I wouldn't invest in the D series either.
I am out of computer vision for now, so I cannot really give any meaningful advice. Disappointing was a high noise grade which gradually increased over time and usage. The camera was not really fit for real-life conditions.
This is absolutely weird, D415 actually seems to be more capable than D435.
D435 has wider FOV comparing to D415, so I believe the left video is from D435.
Are you stupid? It is fucking written on top of each video which camera it is
Thanks for this comparison. Have you ever tried realsense cam for detection of transparent objects such as pet bottle or glass?
D415の方が綺麗に見えるのは面白いですね！
野外で使えるというのがどの程度使えるのか、知りたいです！（届くのは数ヶ月後になりそうなので･･･）
It is interesting that D415 looks better than D435.
I would like to see an outdoor test. ;)
From his point of few, D435 is standing on the left side and D415 on the right (1:24). This could support the hint of Kazuyuki that he actually swooped image streams. You can see the difference in the position of the ceiling lamps. On the left image they are more centered and on the right they are a little bit shifted to the left. So the video on the right is probably the D435 and not the D415...
Naa, I disagree. At 1:24 you can see, that the D415 (from his point of view on the right) is actually tilted a bit more towards the ceiling. Also the D415 has a narrower field of view, which results in objects of same distance appearing to be closer to the camera compared to the D435. If you compare the camera footage, this leads to the conclusion that the image stream on the right is actually the D415. (Like the titles of the image stream windows say D414 on the right and D435 on the left). So in terms of RGB video quality and sharpness, the D415 (rolling shutter) seems to be better than the D435 (global shutter).
Are you all stupid? It tells you which camera the stream belongs to in their individual title bars right above the videos.
Satoshi, D415 looks better and more robust, isn't it?
magnification from D435 is causing distortion and low resolution.
How come 415 output seems better than 435?
it's not, if you speak about the RGB maybe the lens is not cleaned, a simple finger touch above the lens can do that. (435 is the left camera)
It is because the 435 prioritises FOV over accuracy.
realsense.intel.com/compare/
I am noticing that the 435 seems to have less noise in this video than the 415 though. Which is odd because intel states that the 435 typically has twice the noise that the 415 does.
"The Intel RealSense D435 depth camera has more depth noise (>2x) at any given range compared to the Intel RealSense D415 depth camera, and it does have a smaller minimum operation distance (~0.5x) at the same resolution"
@@semicolonaddict8263 There are a number of points at that link that favor the 415.
@@LukeWelles Strange since its cheaper.
Which one is recommended for Windows Hello use and maybe some kinect like gesture control if there are any programs that do it.
I wonder if one of these can be installed below big 43inch monitor or 55inch TV, facing towards TV and somehow use it to detect touches and turning TVs into big touch screen
ありがとうございました。
thanks for sharing
Hi Satoshi, I have a D415 camera and I want to buy a D435 because the Intel web site said D435 is better for fast motion tracking. But according to your video, I find D415 performs better. Do you feel the same? I need your advice to decide to buy a D435 or not. Thanks!
Please checkout the titlebar. Cameras are swapped. Bad test. And Why left camera is so blurry. Is the lens greasy.
Thank you!
Hello Satoshi,
Nice video to get an idea of their depth stream.
Are you running default settings on both cameras, in the SDK depth viewer tool ?
Could you give an estimate of how close and far (the distance in meters) you were pacing with respect to the camera?
The D415 seems to do slightly better in near range even though D435 is supposed to have a slightly better range.
Your response would be really helpful!
Hello,
Please make the same video in 3D mode
So, basically, they now use a different raster than R200 did. Frankly, after some disappointing experience with previous models, I wouldn't invest in the D series either.
Which cameras would you recommend? And what was disappointing? Thanks
I am out of computer vision for now, so I cannot really give any meaningful advice. Disappointing was a high noise grade which gradually increased over time and usage. The camera was not really fit for real-life conditions.
wow, thank you.
I don't know which is which
can any of these perceive gaps with 3-4 mm depth from its minimum distance?
the D435 is pretty poor!