I am just about to start writing my undergrad thesis on Pakistan-Afghanistan issue and I will be using neoclassical realism as my theoretical framework and this video is really helpful to understand neoclassical realism in first place. Thank you very much!
Thank you very much for these great explanations and clear examples... It is much more easy for me to understand the differences between these realist theories...
Wrong understanding of Waltz, which is quite common when it comes to foreign policy...Actually Waltz never argued that when it comes to foreign policy domestic politics is unimportant and that system is the only explanation for states' foreign policy behavior...What he really argued was that system tells some big things about foreign policy, but not everything...His position was that in order to have the full understanding of foreign policy systemic level will not be sufficient and one has to look at the domestic characteristics of states...Actually, he made this argument in many places, in his books: Man, State and War and Theory of International Politics and in his correspondence with Elman in Security Studies where he argued that International Politics is not Foreign Policy....so, to sum up my argument, even Waltz, a structural realist understood that studying foreign policy requires more complex theories...Actually that argument was then further developed by contemporary realists (neoclassical realists) such as: Randall Schweller, Jeffrey Taliaffero and others...
I am just about to start writing my undergrad thesis on Pakistan-Afghanistan issue and I will be using neoclassical realism as my theoretical framework and this video is really helpful to understand neoclassical realism in first place. Thank you very much!
His accent makes him seem more credible
Amazing explanation, thank you!
I find this video very useful and can advise everyone to listen. thanks Oswaldo
Great video! I finally understood it perfectly
Very insightful! Thank you
Very good video to explain this school of realism which I knew little about. Useful as I write my thesis!
Thank you so much for such a nice explaination.
So helpful! Thank You!
Thank you very much for these great explanations and clear examples... It is much more easy for me to understand the differences between these realist theories...
thank you so much !
Excellent explanation sir! Very helpful.
Great job, man!
Thanks so much helped a lot with my revision
Great job
Very helpful to understand the theory,
thank you..
Keep making more and more videos
Thank you very helpful
Very helpfull for my thesis thank you so much.
very comprehensive
Nice
Wrong understanding of Waltz, which is quite common when it comes to foreign policy...Actually Waltz never argued that when it comes to foreign policy domestic politics is unimportant and that system is the only explanation for states' foreign policy behavior...What he really argued was that system tells some big things about foreign policy, but not everything...His position was that in order to have the full understanding of foreign policy systemic level will not be sufficient and one has to look at the domestic characteristics of states...Actually, he made this argument in many places, in his books: Man, State and War and Theory of International Politics and in his correspondence with Elman in Security Studies where he argued that International Politics is not Foreign Policy....so, to sum up my argument, even Waltz, a structural realist understood that studying foreign policy requires more complex theories...Actually that argument was then further developed by contemporary realists (neoclassical realists) such as: Randall Schweller, Jeffrey Taliaffero and others...
Thankyou I wish you were my tutor❤️💐