I am just about to start writing my undergrad thesis on Pakistan-Afghanistan issue and I will be using neoclassical realism as my theoretical framework and this video is really helpful to understand neoclassical realism in first place. Thank you very much!
Thank you very much for these great explanations and clear examples... It is much more easy for me to understand the differences between these realist theories...
Wrong understanding of Waltz, which is quite common when it comes to foreign policy...Actually Waltz never argued that when it comes to foreign policy domestic politics is unimportant and that system is the only explanation for states' foreign policy behavior...What he really argued was that system tells some big things about foreign policy, but not everything...His position was that in order to have the full understanding of foreign policy systemic level will not be sufficient and one has to look at the domestic characteristics of states...Actually, he made this argument in many places, in his books: Man, State and War and Theory of International Politics and in his correspondence with Elman in Security Studies where he argued that International Politics is not Foreign Policy....so, to sum up my argument, even Waltz, a structural realist understood that studying foreign policy requires more complex theories...Actually that argument was then further developed by contemporary realists (neoclassical realists) such as: Randall Schweller, Jeffrey Taliaffero and others...
I am just about to start writing my undergrad thesis on Pakistan-Afghanistan issue and I will be using neoclassical realism as my theoretical framework and this video is really helpful to understand neoclassical realism in first place. Thank you very much!
Amazing explanation, thank you!
His accent makes him seem more credible
I find this video very useful and can advise everyone to listen. thanks Oswaldo
Very good video to explain this school of realism which I knew little about. Useful as I write my thesis!
Thank you so much for such a nice explaination.
Thanks so much helped a lot with my revision
Very insightful! Thank you
Very helpfull for my thesis thank you so much.
Great video! I finally understood it perfectly
Keep making more and more videos
Thank you very much for these great explanations and clear examples... It is much more easy for me to understand the differences between these realist theories...
Very helpful to understand the theory,
thank you..
So helpful! Thank You!
Excellent explanation sir! Very helpful.
Great job
thank you so much !
very comprehensive
Great job, man!
Thank you very helpful
Wrong understanding of Waltz, which is quite common when it comes to foreign policy...Actually Waltz never argued that when it comes to foreign policy domestic politics is unimportant and that system is the only explanation for states' foreign policy behavior...What he really argued was that system tells some big things about foreign policy, but not everything...His position was that in order to have the full understanding of foreign policy systemic level will not be sufficient and one has to look at the domestic characteristics of states...Actually, he made this argument in many places, in his books: Man, State and War and Theory of International Politics and in his correspondence with Elman in Security Studies where he argued that International Politics is not Foreign Policy....so, to sum up my argument, even Waltz, a structural realist understood that studying foreign policy requires more complex theories...Actually that argument was then further developed by contemporary realists (neoclassical realists) such as: Randall Schweller, Jeffrey Taliaffero and others...
Thankyou I wish you were my tutor❤️💐
Nice