MBTI Experts React to LOVE IS BLIND S4
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
- 🧠 FULL Celebrity Analysis videos: learn.ericwen....
🎯 Learn MBTI & Find your Type in 3 Days: learn.ericwen....
🧠 Full LOVE IS BLIND S4 Analysis Series:
learn.ericwen....
🫂 Make Friends in our Think More Deeply Discord Server!
learn.ericwen....
(At time of this upload, my channel has 3906 subscribers.) - Розваги
As my personality type being ENFJ I thought Kwame and Micha were being straight forward 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Great video. Wasnt expecting to see Zack typed as an INTJ, but surprisingly makes a lot of sense. Also kinda explains why his relationship with Irnia (who im pretty sure is an unhealthy ESFP) panned out the way it did. Not that opposite type relationships cant work out, because they can and definitely do, it's just a matter of them willing to communicate their differences and build off from that.
Would be interesting to see you guys analyze "The Ultimatum: Queer Love" eccsepcially since its pride month and all. Lexi (ENTJ) and Rae's (who might be an ISFP imo) dynamic is interesting to say the least 😬
Talked tons about Zach and Irina in the second part of the series! Super interesting seeing their differences clash and misunderstandings! Thanks for watching!!
Cool to see a male enfj! I recognise some traits of both the enfj and infj in my self.
Kwame`s Fe energy is simply amazing
thank you for using their interactions to show their functions. I've seen others be off in their typing the 'love is blind' cast..
hello 😅 um .. a question !
so when people use crossroads to say what they mean instead of directly that's Ni ??
i had a friend where, when you would ask him ANYTHING. he would start from like the big picture, any crossroad and at the end he would've told you the answer you wanted. he was Ni?
I’d have to know much more to say if it was Ni - different people can do things for different reasons. But it’s possible that that pattern might be related to his personality yes haha!
what's Zarene type tho??
What is Z's type?
4:14 he's not a Ti dom. He uses Fe too well. He's describing Ti in an Fe way. Demon Fe is really awkward. You can see it clearly in the next example.
In contrast, a real Ti dom, Eric being one, can be seen at 8:08. See the awkwardness when a sexual joke arises? Compare his state with the previous segment when Eric is describing Ti with his own Ti. It's even clearer when you contrast the reaction between Eric and the lady down there (sorry don't know her name). People who have demon feelings have CLEAR SIGNS of discomfort/awkwardness when it comes to things related to feelings.
As stated on your other comment - totally ok if you have different perspectives or type conclusions from this clip! But, hope we can still keep things respectful and be open to different perspectives in the comments too if possible, thanks!
In regards to Paul - again, our personal type conclusions on him didn't come just from this short clip or even this episode. They came from watching the entire show which included hours of his interactions and thoughts, not one time, but actually more than twice. In the show, he does banter here and there but he actually does show many repeated examples of exactly the patterns you described - being very uncomfortable and awkward with higher stakes Fe and really having troubles adjusting from his personal logic, thoughts and assessments of things in order to be more agreeable and take care of other people's feelings around him.
I think you'd find it very interesting to watch if you ever got to it!
@Think More Deeply I'm quite open to different ideas, being an info dominant like yourself in Objective Personality language. If I seem abrasive, I'm quite sorry. I sincerely apologize. I also understand that indeed we need to watch more clips of him to come to an accurate assessment of his personality type. But with that being said, I do feel like the clips of him shown in this video don't really reflect your conclusions of him being a Ti dominant. Perhaps you should pick a different example so as to illustrate your point better. Thanks for the reply again!