The loss is 500. Let me give an alternative approach to the question... suppose C gave 400 and an item worth 100 to the lady for free (the loss of C is now 500), now C gives S a false 500 currency note for which S gives 500 currency change to C. Now C returns 500 as the note which he gave to S was false. This transaction is balanced as he returned the amount which he got. Therefore, The total loss of C is still 500 Hope it was simple ✨
For Those who need clarity, imagine the shopkeep had 500 x 2 = 1000 initially. Now, customer gave 500 total = 1500, Now, shopkeeper went and brought 500 -> 100 x 5. Total again 1500 gave 400 + goods. New Total with shopkeeper = 1100. Fake note was provided So gave away 500. New Total with shopkeep = 600 + 500(Fake note) Loss = Initial - Final = 1000 - 600 = 400 + 100 (Goods) = 500. The exchange between L and C voids when equal exchanges take place.
You can also think like this: Initially no one had any loss or profit. But after, the lady got 100 Rs item and 400 Rs change which implies she got 500 profit. As S took away the original 500 note, so S doesn't jave any profit or loss again. So C had 500 loss which was incurred due to 500 profit for lady.
the loss may be of rs.1000 but what if the seller had some profit included in the price of the product that he sold at rs.100 so the actual loss will be calculated after knowing his profit margin and then by deducting that profit margin from 1000rs.
Jis 100 rupay ka saman ko bacha gaya agar uska cp 90 rupay ho toh suru mai dukan dar ko 10 rupees ka profit hota hai 100 rupay mai becha na par uska baad agar 500 rupay dusra dukan dar ko dena pada nakli note ki bajah se toh loss 490 hota hai...... So answer cp and profit margin par dependent hai..... Agar 100 rupay pura profit mai ho toh loss 400 hoga
Dont try to think much guys The calculation was balanced till none knows about fake note. After knowing about it, C gives 500 to S which means loss is 500 for C. And that loss become profit for L. Those who saying about 100 and 400 100 was still in pocket of C & 400 was not C's money, it was just change i.e that money was not from his pocket
Let's see the answer with more clarity Here we go Let's consider Ladki=L , Selling shopkeeper=C , The shop keeper who give change=S now L has Rs 500 and she want to buy a item cost Rs 100, but the C has not change of Rs 500 so he get change Rs(5*100) from S and gave Rs100(Item)+Change(Rs400)=Rs500 But the Rs500 gave by L is fake so S became angry and go to the C for real money and C has already gave the girl Rs 400 so he added Rs 400 to the left Rs 100 and gave it to the S. In conclusion L=Fake Rs 500 C=Not change S=Change=Rs5*100 So at last C need to give Item(Rs100)+Change(Rs400)+Left money(Rs100)+Rs400 added to give S inorder to pay back his fake currency =Rs100+Rs400+Rs100+Rs400 =Rs1000 ans
Let assume uske paas 500 ka change hai that time usne customer ko 400 vapis kar diye ab tak vo profit mai hai, after some time he noticed 500 note is fake that time he was in a loss of 500 hundred. Current scenario:- Customer aaya 100 ka saman liya 400 chutte vapis liye chala gaya, ab tak hamara shopkeeper profit mai hai, jab dusra shopkeeper aaya usne apne shopkeeper se 500 ke fake note se real 500 ka note exchange kara tab apna Shopkeeper 500 ke loss mai aaya Total loss 500/- apne shopkeeper ko
The first shopkeeper did not verify the note, but the second shopkeeper certainly would have checked it. However, let’s assume that he also did not verify it. This scenario does not align with reality because, in the real world, shopkeepers typically check large notes as soon as they receive them. Shopkeepers have tools to verify notes, and taking large notes without checking is a significant mistake. Even if a shopkeeper makes such a mistake, the second shopkeeper would usually check the note, which makes this situation even more unrealistic. Honest Shopkeeper: The honest shopkeeper accepted a ₹500 counterfeit note without checking. After receiving the note, he exchanged it with the second shopkeeper for change and gave the customer their products. When it was discovered that the note was counterfeit, the honest shopkeeper suffered a total loss. Profit margins for shopkeepers are generally small; for instance, on a ₹100 product, there might be a profit of ₹20. If the honest shopkeeper sold a product for ₹100 and accepted a ₹500 counterfeit note, his total loss would be ₹480 + ₹400, which is significant for him. This loss occurred because the honest shopkeeper did not verify the note beforehand. In the real world, if any shopkeeper were to accept a large note without checking, they would likely face a similar situation. This serves as an important lesson that shopkeepers should always verify large notes before accepting them. Clever Shopkeeper: The clever shopkeeper was shrewd. He also accepted the counterfeit note but chose to use it at another shop to buy products. The clever shopkeeper knew that the note was counterfeit but tried to shift his loss onto someone else. He exchanged the ₹500 counterfeit note for goods and made a profit of ₹20 in the process. The clever shopkeeper's approach was unethical. He passed the counterfeit note onto another shopkeeper, which is illegal and wrong. His strategy can be viewed more from the perspective of fraud rather than wisdom, as he attempted to shift his loss onto another shopkeeper. If caught, legal action could be taken against the clever shopkeeper. Conclusion: Overall, this scenario is unrealistic because shopkeepers typically verify large notes before accepting them. The honest shopkeeper suffered a loss because he failed to check the note, while the clever shopkeeper unethically shifted his loss onto someone else. In the real world, it is crucial for all shopkeepers to check large notes to avoid counterfeit currency. 😅
We can understand in this way D = Duplicate 1. Lady gave 500(d) to C 2. C returned 400 and product(100). 3. C took exchange of 500(d) from S. Assume (400 + 100). 4. Then again S took his (400 + 100) back after knowing that 500(d) is fake
Bro she is misleading you. Fake transaction happen in two place one to shopkeeper s and one from lady to shopkeeper c. Shopkeeper c has two liability now. Think like this . Let's try to solve this Lady to c =500fake C to s= 500 fake S to c= 500. Real C to lady = 400 Real C to s = 500 real 900 rs lost . because 100 is changed given by shopkeers s which he still have.
Guys don't think it with complexity, if the woman's note was real, then there would have been no loss at all. But it's fake, which belongs to shopkeeper C now, that means the only loss is of Shopkeeper C which is 500/-
@@mayurpitre dont look at the note as just paper, look at its value only. S had a note that valued 500, that C gave, once the note was deemed valueless, C had to give a Valued 500 to S in return of none, so C lost 500 worth in value
900 ka loss hoga kyunki lady ko to asli 400 return huwe aur fake 500 c ke pass gaya jo ki wapas L ke pass se uska return asli note 500 le liya means = 500 shopkeeper ne C ko diya + 400 return lady ko kiya = ₹900 (500 ka Fake note to Shopkeeper ke pass hi reh gaya aur 100 rupye ka saman jiska koi mtlb ni)
He has no loss Bcz usne C shopkeeper se 500 rupees ka change liya uske badle L lady ke nikali 500 rupees C shopkeeper ko diye honge and usne C shopkeeper se liye hue asli 500 rupees main se 400 rupees L lady ko diye honge and baki uske pass 100 rupees bache uska L lady ne saman le liya tha Toh uska loss 0 rupees hua Am I right ?
Yes! But if and only if shopkeeper C doesn't have to return the 500 to shopkeeper S. Which means either shopkeeper C lost 500 or shopkeeper S lost 500.
Shop keeper ne 500 S ko diye ek to wo nuksaan Or ek 100 ka item diya wo nuksan 500+100 = 600 But isme s 100 usne khud k paas bhi rakhe saman ke to wo kam hojaynge 600-100 = 500 Ye total nuksaan us C ko hua H Jo log keh rhe h k usne 400 cash b to diya to wo uski pocket ka nhi tha wo 500 k chnge ka cash tha Easy
400 rs lady ko diye wo shopkeeper ka thodi tha...wo dusre dost ka tha...500 is correct and final answer...ek ka profit yaane dusre ka loss...lady ka 500 ka profit yaane shopkeeper ka 500 ka loss...final answer 500
No bro, usne apna product to diya lekin, usne 500 me se 100 rupey to apne paas hi rakhe na, aur 400 ladki ko diya usi product ke Saath, isliye uska product ka loss to nahi hua, kyuki product ke 100 rupey usne apne paas rakh hi liye the
@@theamalgamation Dekho bahinwoh sahi hai because shopkeeper c ne 100ka product +400 rupees diye Bad mein shopkeeper s ne shopkeeper l ko 500return karke apna 500wapas le liya isiliye 100 + 400 +100 = 600 ka loss Koi confusion ho toh pahunch Lena Nahin toh twisson padhne ke liye Bihar ke supaul ke malhani gaon mein AA Jana Jai shree ram
Anyone with answer 900? Coz lady ultimately gave 0 rs and shopkeeper c gave 500 to lady and 500 to shopkeeper s so -1000, but shopkeeper s gave initially 500(real money), from which shopkeeper c still has 100. So -1000+100=-900
Correct Answer is ₹1000. If Shopkeeper C wouldn't have borrowed the change from shopkeeper S then the correct answer is ₹500. Forget about the ₹100 he had. He has sold a product. If I'm a shopkeeper C then i had sold a product worth ₹100, given change ₹400 and also given real ₹500 to shopkeeper S.
@@ayrinakterasita429 Are bhaiya 400 +100 to lady legyi thik h jo original note tha ab bichare shopkeeper k pas to 500 ka Nkli leke aaya dusra shopkeepr to usko fir se 500 original dena pda yani 500 dusre dukandar ko or 500 us lady ka khrcha yani 1000huana
Just consider it like this: Shopkeeper C borrowed 500 from Shopkeeper S and returned it to him, so his net loss is 500 - 500 = 0 (like he never borrowed anything). Now Shopkeeper C gave 400 cash and 100 worth of items to Lady L, so here his net loss is 400 + 100 = 500.
He didn’t borrow though he exchanged it for a fake 500 so from that he got real 5 100 notes he gave 4 of those plus 100 worth of goods to the lady so that’s 500 and then the shopkeeper s found out it was fake and wanted his 500 back so he asked for it and so c had to give 500 back to him now if he gave it to him using 100 he gave him 400 and one 100 that he already got from him so that’s way his loss would technically be 900
Rs 500 loss. Simple. The first transaction closed nicely for the shopkeeper. So the additional Rs 500 (to replace the fake note) is the only loss he incurred.
I also first thought it would be 1000, but it will be 500 loss, let me explain: let the shopkeeper condition be at 0, he gained 500, so +500, then he gave 100 rs item and 400 rs change to her, so again 0, then what happened that 500 had a value of 0, so he has to return 500 to other shopkeeper, so 0-500= -500, so total loss 500
Shopkeeper S gave 500 rupees to shopkeeper C and shopkeeper C gave 400 rupees to the lady that means when he had to give 500 to S he gave 400 from his own pocket and 100 was given back to S which he gave to C earlier. So now C had the total loss of rs. 400 + rs. 100(saaman ke) = rs. 500 ka total loss
900 loss 400 change + 500 shopkeeper . saman ka real price hai na uske pass . kyunki dusra shopkeeper ne to asli diya tha 500 . usme se 100 rakh diya usne . aur 400 change kar diya . matlab saman ka to paisa mill geya usko . aur dusra shopkeeper ne jab paisa mangne aya tha tab usko 500 de diya . change diya 400 aur dusra shopkeeper ko diya 500 . total loss 900 .
I think C has lost 100rs valued vegetables.. Look C has given the fake note 500 but take 100*5 real notes and then give the lady 400 tk..so initialltly c had vegetables but at the last he gave just vegetables valued of 100rs
Galat ….. he did not loose 500 rs because Shopkeeper ke goods ki selling value 100 rs thi naaki purchasing value so technically he loose 400rs + Purchase Value of goods( Rs. 100-20% included margin )
400₹+100saman yani jo asli 500₹ chutte laya tha vo usne lady ko dediye ok Ab vapis dusra shopkeeper nkli not leke aaya to usne jo asli chutte laya tha vo to laddy ko dediye the to dusre shopkeeper ko to use Vapis apni jab se 500₹ dena P dena Yani 400₹+ 100 ka saman lady +500₹ dusra shopkeeper Yani total 1000₹ loss hua na
1000 C exchange money with S 500 gives back ₹400 Later S ask money back c gives him 500 So s 500 plus 400 plus 100 worth of goods which is 1000 is total loss
It doesn't matter ke 500 ke note ki value thi ya nahi C ko to loss hua hi because he returned the 500 to S and also returned 400 to lady with 100rs goods...so in total he faces 1000rs loss
S ne c ko 500 diye as change phir s ne c se wahi 500 wapis liye. Toh c ka koi loss udhar ni hua. Usne jitna lady se exchange Kiya c ko utna hi loss hua
women gave five hundred which has no value Then 1st shopkeeper went and rs 5️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ borrowed He returned 500 rs for 2nd sk therefore he gave him his money back but not from his collection Hence we are now left with the loss he gained by women 100 +400 =500 Loss of 500/- ✔️😊
Lady give him 500rs fake note okay. Then shopkeeper C take 500rs from S buy giving him fake 500rs note. So after C give 400rs and 100rs item to lady so it become 500rs. And after knowing that 500rs is fake he have to again pay that money to s so again 500rs so total is 1000rs
@@prepschoolgamer2288 It's 500 only let's leave the fake note before and think Shopkeeper C gave Real 500 to shopkeeper S and took change from him role of Shopkeeper S done now the customer comes and Shopkeeper C accepted fake 500 and gave her 400 and item of 100 Net loss is ₹500 I think I am going right
Understand it like this. Remove fake 500 ruppe note from picture 1. He give 400 (cash) +100(items) to lady which is eqaul to 500 2. He also give 500 to another shopkeeper Total 1000
Jabab hai 500 .kueki shopkeeper c ke pas avhi nakli 500 rupi hai jinke badle mai unhone lady ko 100 ka shaman or 400 rupi diya .or jho dusre shopkeeper le gaya vo unhi ka pasa tha jho unhone as a change diya tha 😊
500 ka hi huaa kyoki jo vo pahle 400+saman 100 rupaye ka ledi ko diya tha vo to dusre ke pass se diye tha., smjhna bhai abhi tk to vo dusra loss me tha n 500 ki note nakli vali dusre ke pass thi lekin jb use pta chla ki 500 ki note nakali hai to usne main dukandar se apne paise mage tb vo main dukan dar jiske pass ledi aayi thi vo us dusre dukandar ko 500 apne pass se vapas kiya aur nakli note main ne le liya apne pass tb vah ghate me aaya na tb main dukandar sirf 500 hi ghate me aaaya bhai smjhe
500 is correct bro Tum socho shopkeeper S ne 500 diye phir wapas le liye, koi loss to nhi hua. Lekin lady L ne 0 rs diye aur 100 + 400 le liye. So total loss 500 hi hua. Mai bhi confuse tha ki 1000 nhi to 900 loss hoga lekin actually 500 ka hi loss hua hai
@@modassirjeelani5480 bro uss 500 ka koi value nehi tha ,, so that's void ,, now shopkeeper ne pehele ladki ko 400 ka change aur 100 ka saman dia ,, uske baad usne dusre shopkeeper ko 500 ka note dia as wo pehle wala note fake tha
Let's try to solve this Lady to c =500fake C to s= 500 fake S to c= 500. Real C to lady = 400 Real C to s = 500 real 900 rs lost . because 100 is changed given by shopkeeper s which he has left.
It's loss of ₹600
₹100 for the item along with the change of ₹500
100 ka saman + 400 change + 500 dusre shopkeeper ko toh total = 1000 😂
Technically ₹1000 is correct
@@vikashdalmiya2224 yeah
400 change wont count because it was not his money
Yes bro
@@lol-zd8mh aree change toh shopkeeper ne hi diya na apne jebse
The loss is 500.
Let me give an alternative approach to the question... suppose C gave 400 and an item worth 100 to the lady for free (the loss of C is now 500), now C gives S a false 500 currency note for which S gives 500 currency change to C. Now C returns 500 as the note which he gave to S was false. This transaction is balanced as he returned the amount which he got. Therefore,
The total loss of C is still 500
Hope it was simple ✨
Bada angrez banada
Thanks yrr ab clear hogya🤍☺️
@@abhinavjain168thm9 😂😂
@@tanujaDhapola-d7e😊
Ekdum sahi....
For Those who need clarity, imagine the shopkeep had 500 x 2 = 1000 initially. Now, customer gave 500 total = 1500, Now, shopkeeper went and brought 500 -> 100 x 5. Total again 1500 gave 400 + goods. New Total with shopkeeper = 1100. Fake note was provided So gave away 500. New Total with shopkeep = 600 + 500(Fake note)
Loss = Initial - Final = 1000 - 600 = 400 + 100 (Goods) = 500.
The exchange between L and C voids when equal exchanges take place.
Best explanation bro 👍
You can also think like this:
Initially no one had any loss or profit.
But after, the lady got 100 Rs item and 400 Rs change which implies she got 500 profit. As S took away the original 500 note, so S doesn't jave any profit or loss again. So C had 500 loss which was incurred due to 500 profit for lady.
Am I the only one who think it is 600?
500 which he had to return to Shopkeeper, 100 worth of item which he gave to the lady
Yes
@@RgNopeshopkeeper still have that 100 rupees in his pocket. So final loss 500 rs to shopkeeper
Finally I guessed correct 💯💯
What answer
the loss may be of rs.1000 but what if the seller had some profit included in the price of the product that he sold at rs.100 so the actual loss will be calculated after knowing his profit margin and then by deducting that profit margin from 1000rs.
500 is correct and final answer...ek ka profit yaane dusre ka loss...lady ka 500 ka profit yaane shopkeeper ka 500 ka loss...final answer 500
Jis 100 rupay ka saman ko bacha gaya agar uska cp 90 rupay ho toh suru mai dukan dar ko 10 rupees ka profit hota hai 100 rupay mai becha na par uska baad agar 500 rupay dusra dukan dar ko dena pada nakli note ki bajah se toh loss 490 hota hai...... So answer cp and profit margin par dependent hai..... Agar 100 rupay pura profit mai ho toh loss 400 hoga
Dont try to think much guys
The calculation was balanced till none knows about fake note. After knowing about it, C gives 500 to S which means loss is 500 for C. And that loss become profit for L.
Those who saying about 100 and 400
100 was still in pocket of C &
400 was not C's money, it was just change i.e that money was not from his pocket
500₹(c-L-f only ₹500 moving, 400+goods)
100 ka saman L ko diya
And 400 phir return kiya
500 shopkeeper S
And 100 saman purchaseing ka
Total hue 1100
What about the price of the groceries sold?! answer is 600! !
Let's see the answer with more clarity
Here we go
Let's consider Ladki=L , Selling shopkeeper=C , The shop keeper who give change=S
now
L has Rs 500 and she want to buy a item cost Rs 100, but the C has not change of Rs 500 so he get change Rs(5*100) from S and gave Rs100(Item)+Change(Rs400)=Rs500
But the Rs500 gave by L is fake so S became angry and go to the C for real money and C has already gave the girl Rs 400 so he added Rs 400 to the left Rs 100 and gave it to the S.
In conclusion
L=Fake Rs 500
C=Not change
S=Change=Rs5*100
So at last C need to give Item(Rs100)+Change(Rs400)+Left money(Rs100)+Rs400 added to give S inorder to pay back his fake currency
=Rs100+Rs400+Rs100+Rs400
=Rs1000 ans
Your is knowledgeable
Let assume uske paas 500 ka change hai that time usne customer ko 400 vapis kar diye ab tak vo profit mai hai, after some time he noticed 500 note is fake that time he was in a loss of 500 hundred.
Current scenario:- Customer aaya 100 ka saman liya 400 chutte vapis liye chala gaya, ab tak hamara shopkeeper profit mai hai, jab dusra shopkeeper aaya usne apne shopkeeper se 500 ke fake note se real 500 ka note exchange kara tab apna Shopkeeper 500 ke loss mai aaya
Total loss 500/- apne shopkeeper ko
Shopkeeper C's loss = ₹400 + Cost of the goods sold (it may
The first shopkeeper did not verify the note, but the second shopkeeper certainly would have checked it. However, let’s assume that he also did not verify it. This scenario does not align with reality because, in the real world, shopkeepers typically check large notes as soon as they receive them. Shopkeepers have tools to verify notes, and taking large notes without checking is a significant mistake. Even if a shopkeeper makes such a mistake, the second shopkeeper would usually check the note, which makes this situation even more unrealistic.
Honest Shopkeeper:
The honest shopkeeper accepted a ₹500 counterfeit note without checking. After receiving the note, he exchanged it with the second shopkeeper for change and gave the customer their products. When it was discovered that the note was counterfeit, the honest shopkeeper suffered a total loss. Profit margins for shopkeepers are generally small; for instance, on a ₹100 product, there might be a profit of ₹20. If the honest shopkeeper sold a product for ₹100 and accepted a ₹500 counterfeit note, his total loss would be ₹480 + ₹400, which is significant for him.
This loss occurred because the honest shopkeeper did not verify the note beforehand. In the real world, if any shopkeeper were to accept a large note without checking, they would likely face a similar situation. This serves as an important lesson that shopkeepers should always verify large notes before accepting them.
Clever Shopkeeper:
The clever shopkeeper was shrewd. He also accepted the counterfeit note but chose to use it at another shop to buy products. The clever shopkeeper knew that the note was counterfeit but tried to shift his loss onto someone else. He exchanged the ₹500 counterfeit note for goods and made a profit of ₹20 in the process.
The clever shopkeeper's approach was unethical. He passed the counterfeit note onto another shopkeeper, which is illegal and wrong. His strategy can be viewed more from the perspective of fraud rather than wisdom, as he attempted to shift his loss onto another shopkeeper. If caught, legal action could be taken against the clever shopkeeper.
Conclusion:
Overall, this scenario is unrealistic because shopkeepers typically verify large notes before accepting them. The honest shopkeeper suffered a loss because he failed to check the note, while the clever shopkeeper unethically shifted his loss onto someone else. In the real world, it is crucial for all shopkeepers to check large notes to avoid counterfeit currency.
😅
Mam i have question what is light
A light is a energy which is sensation of vision of eye
@KeshavFF-q6f thank you❤
We can understand in this way
D = Duplicate
1. Lady gave 500(d) to C
2. C returned 400 and product(100).
3. C took exchange of 500(d) from S. Assume (400 + 100).
4. Then again S took his (400 + 100) back after knowing that 500(d) is fake
Bro she is misleading you.
Fake transaction happen in two place one to shopkeeper s and one from lady to shopkeeper c.
Shopkeeper c has two liability now.
Think like this .
Let's try to solve this
Lady to c =500fake
C to s= 500 fake
S to c= 500. Real
C to lady = 400 Real
C to s = 500 real
900 rs lost . because 100 is changed given by shopkeers s which he still have.
Again think like this lady gives nothing while shopkeeper c gives 500 to lady and 400 to shopkeeper s .
If she didn't gave any thing then why should I go near shopkeeper s directly i give 500 or something worth of 500 which is lose for me
Guys don't think it with complexity, if the woman's note was real, then there would have been no loss at all. But it's fake, which belongs to shopkeeper C now, that means the only loss is of Shopkeeper C which is 500/-
But he did take change from S so he will ask the original 500 hundred note ? If I am wrong please try to explain
That's why C has a loss of 500, otherwise shopkeeper S has that loss of 500.
@@mayurpitre dont look at the note as just paper, look at its value only. S had a note that valued 500, that C gave, once the note was deemed valueless, C had to give a Valued 500 to S in return of none, so C lost 500 worth in value
500 is correct and final answer...ek ka profit yaane dusre ka loss...lady ka 500 ka profit yaane shopkeeper ka 500 ka loss...final answer 500
900 ka loss hoga kyunki lady ko to asli 400 return huwe aur fake 500 c ke pass gaya jo ki wapas L ke pass se uska return asli note 500 le liya means = 500 shopkeeper ne C ko diya + 400 return lady ko kiya = ₹900 (500 ka Fake note to Shopkeeper ke pass hi reh gaya aur 100 rupye ka saman jiska koi mtlb ni)
I am 11 years old and I was also thinking the same only
@@camman18fanformission so what does ur age have to do with that?
@@blackbird-_-8666 Oh come on, just for information 🙄
He has no loss
Bcz usne C shopkeeper se 500 rupees ka change liya uske badle L lady ke nikali 500 rupees C shopkeeper ko diye honge and usne C shopkeeper se liye hue asli 500 rupees main se 400 rupees L lady ko diye honge and baki uske pass 100 rupees bache uska L lady ne saman le liya tha
Toh uska loss 0 rupees hua
Am I right ?
Yes! But if and only if shopkeeper C doesn't have to return the 500 to shopkeeper S.
Which means either shopkeeper C lost 500 or shopkeeper S lost 500.
Shop keeper ne 500 S ko diye ek to wo nuksaan
Or ek 100 ka item diya wo nuksan
500+100 = 600
But isme s 100 usne khud k paas bhi rakhe saman ke to wo kam hojaynge
600-100 = 500
Ye total nuksaan us C ko hua H
Jo log keh rhe h k usne 400 cash b to diya to wo uski pocket ka nhi tha wo 500 k chnge ka cash tha
Easy
100 saman + 400 return to lady + 500 return to 2nd shopkeeper = 1000 to hua
400 rs lady ko diye wo shopkeeper ka thodi tha...wo dusre dost ka tha...500 is correct and final answer...ek ka profit yaane dusre ka loss...lady ka 500 ka profit yaane shopkeeper ka 500 ka loss...final answer 500
600rs
No bro, usne apna product to diya lekin, usne 500 me se 100 rupey to apne paas hi rakhe na, aur 400 ladki ko diya usi product ke Saath, isliye uska product ka loss to nahi hua, kyuki product ke 100 rupey usne apne paas rakh hi liye the
@@theamalgamation Dekho bahinwoh sahi hai because shopkeeper c ne 100ka product +400 rupees diye
Bad mein shopkeeper s ne shopkeeper l ko 500return karke apna 500wapas le liya isiliye
100 + 400 +100 = 600 ka loss
Koi confusion ho toh pahunch Lena
Nahin toh twisson padhne ke liye Bihar ke supaul ke malhani gaon mein AA Jana
Jai shree ram
💯 right 👍🏻
Ans is simple
500 barrow then 500 gave back
so , loss 0
To the lady he gave 400 money +100 worth item
So,500 loss
500 total loss. 400 rupees given back to S and 100 rupees of goods given back to L
Fool 500 given back to s not 400 😒
Anyone with answer 900?
Coz lady ultimately gave 0 rs and shopkeeper c gave 500 to lady and 500 to shopkeeper s so -1000, but shopkeeper s gave initially 500(real money), from which shopkeeper c still has 100. So -1000+100=-900
600
Correct Answer is ₹1000. If Shopkeeper C wouldn't have borrowed the change from shopkeeper S then the correct answer is ₹500. Forget about the ₹100 he had. He has sold a product. If I'm a shopkeeper C then i had sold a product worth ₹100, given change ₹400 and also given real ₹500 to shopkeeper S.
The correct answer would be 400+cost price of the sold goods
1000 ha kyoki shop s ne or lady l ne
Lady=100+400. Shop kipper S ne 500 liya or Hisar kud laga lo
Shop keeper 500 chotta diya tha nakly note badle vo hi leke gaya hishab barabar hua na bacha bas nakli note jishke badle lady ne 500 liya to loss 500
@@ayrinakterasita429
Are bhaiya 400 +100 to lady legyi thik h jo original note tha ab bichare shopkeeper k pas to 500 ka Nkli leke aaya dusra shopkeepr to usko fir se 500 original dena pda yani 500 dusre dukandar ko or 500 us lady ka khrcha yani 1000huana
Just consider it like this:
Shopkeeper C borrowed 500 from Shopkeeper S and returned it to him, so his net loss is 500 - 500 = 0 (like he never borrowed anything).
Now Shopkeeper C gave 400 cash and 100 worth of items to Lady L, so here his net loss is 400 + 100 = 500.
He didn’t borrow though he exchanged it for a fake 500 so from that he got real 5 100 notes he gave 4 of those plus 100 worth of goods to the lady so that’s 500 and then the shopkeeper s found out it was fake and wanted his 500 back so he asked for it and so c had to give 500 back to him now if he gave it to him using 100 he gave him 400 and one 100 that he already got from him so that’s way his loss would technically be 900
U changed the whole scenario dude
@@Donald-n6jthe 400 which shopkeeper C gave to the Lady L were never his in the first place, he borrowed those from S.
Hehe I came with all posibilities and than after reading comment I came to know I thought in all direction first my answer was 900 than 600 now 1000
Rs 500 loss.
Simple. The first transaction closed nicely for the shopkeeper. So the additional Rs 500 (to replace the fake note) is the only loss he incurred.
Total : ₹1,000
₹100 Product + ₹400 return to L + ₹500 return to S (According to your sound that "Aasli ₹500 wapas diya") = ₹1000
I also first thought it would be 1000, but it will be 500 loss, let me explain:
let the shopkeeper condition be at 0, he gained 500, so +500, then he gave 100 rs item and 400 rs change to her, so again 0, then what happened that 500 had a value of 0, so he has to return 500 to other shopkeeper, so 0-500= -500, so total loss 500
No wrong
@@RgNope can you explain
Shopkeeper S gave 500 rupees to shopkeeper C and shopkeeper C gave 400 rupees to the lady that means when he had to give 500 to S he gave 400 from his own pocket and 100 was given back to S which he gave to C earlier. So now C had the total loss of rs. 400 + rs. 100(saaman ke) = rs. 500 ka total loss
That's easy answer is : children bank of india 😅
1000
Please add further info: The purchase price of the item was Rs. 80. This will also explain the concept of "loss of profit" Rs. 20 !!
900 loss
400 change + 500 shopkeeper . saman ka real price hai na uske pass . kyunki dusra shopkeeper ne to asli diya tha 500 . usme se 100 rakh diya usne . aur 400 change kar diya . matlab saman ka to paisa mill geya usko . aur dusra shopkeeper ne jab paisa mangne aya tha tab usko 500 de diya . change diya 400 aur dusra shopkeeper ko diya 500 . total loss 900 .
900 ka loss huwa kyuki 500 me se 100 to saman ke le liye or 400 de diye or fir 500 note nakli hone par diye to 400+500=900
My answer is correct
1000 rupees ❤😮😮
100 rupees for items and 400 rupees for returning to s then your loss is 100+400=500
I think C has lost 100rs valued vegetables.. Look C has given the fake note 500 but take 100*5 real notes and then give the lady 400 tk..so initialltly c had vegetables but at the last he gave just vegetables valued of 100rs
100 rupees aytam ( saman ) + 400 rupees change+ 500 rupees give the other man then total amount is = 1000 rupees
It should be 600 n?
You missed 400 change returned to shopper lady
@@nikunjrana1408 yaa i realized that after commenting... I thought I should change it but it was my answer within 3 sec
100 ka Saman + 400 change + 500 to shopkeeper S = 1000 rupees loss to shopkeeper C
Plsss tell question in english I don't know Hindi 😭😭😭😭😭
C give Rs. 1000 because C give 500 to S and he also give L rs. 100 item + rs. 400 = 1000 rupee
😂😂 C give 1000 not 500
bhaii , 900 loss
500rs as a change which give from c
And 100rs of item which give to her lady
Si in this way shopkeeper lost the 600 rs
Galat ….. he did not loose 500 rs because Shopkeeper ke goods ki selling value 100 rs thi naaki purchasing value so technically he loose
400rs + Purchase Value of goods( Rs. 100-20% included margin )
400₹+100saman yani jo asli 500₹ chutte laya tha vo usne lady ko dediye ok
Ab vapis dusra shopkeeper nkli not leke aaya to usne jo asli chutte laya tha vo to laddy ko dediye the to dusre shopkeeper ko to use Vapis apni jab se 500₹ dena P dena
Yani 400₹+ 100 ka saman lady
+500₹ dusra shopkeeper
Yani total
1000₹ loss hua na
0
1000
C exchange money with S 500 gives back ₹400
Later
S ask money back c gives him 500
So s 500 plus 400 plus 100 worth of goods which is 1000 is total loss
0 ka loss
It doesn't matter ke 500 ke note ki value thi ya nahi C ko to loss hua hi because he returned the 500 to S and also returned 400 to lady with 100rs goods...so in total he faces 1000rs loss
S ne c ko 500 diye as change phir s ne c se wahi 500 wapis liye. Toh c ka koi loss udhar ni hua. Usne jitna lady se exchange Kiya c ko utna hi loss hua
100 saman+ 400 return+ 500 exxhange= 1000 tk moye moye
she is right
women gave five hundred which has no value
Then 1st shopkeeper went and rs 5️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ borrowed
He returned 500 rs for 2nd sk therefore he gave him his money back but not from his collection
Hence we are now left with the loss he gained by women 100 +400 =500
Loss of 500/- ✔️😊
Bro I think see
Lady give him 500rs fake note okay.
Then shopkeeper C take 500rs from S buy giving him fake 500rs note. So after C give 400rs and 100rs item to lady so it become 500rs. And after knowing that 500rs is fake he have to again pay that money to s so again 500rs so total is 1000rs
@@prepschoolgamer2288 It's 500 only let's leave the fake note before and think Shopkeeper C gave Real 500 to shopkeeper S and took change from him role of Shopkeeper S done now the customer comes and Shopkeeper C accepted fake 500 and gave her 400 and item of 100 Net loss is ₹500
I think I am going right
Moral of the story: that shopkeeper CANNOT be Indian fr💀😂
Understand it like this. Remove fake 500 ruppe note from picture
1. He give 400 (cash) +100(items) to lady which is eqaul to 500
2. He also give 500 to another shopkeeper
Total 1000
Sorry for interruption, the another shopkeeper returned him the change of 500 rupees first. That means the total loss is 500 only.
If he returned him how did he manage to give 400 to that lady?
@@satyamgarg4364Lady ke chale jane ke bad jb dusre shopkeeper ko apni jeb se 500 dena pada vahi to ghata hai...
That was very easy. Actually it’s 1000 and not 500
Answer should be 600
500🎉🎉
The answer is 600
The basket of fruits is of 100
You told 500
Total 600 Rs
100 Rs item ka price+500 Rs jo shopkeeper ko diye
but he got 100 RS form her. 500 is correct.
@@MoneyTick-y1i 500 Rs ka note fake tha toh vo 100 Rs ka loss bhi toh usy hi bear krna pda
900 or item ka main rate
Total loss incurred to shopkeeper C is Rs 600.
Jabab hai 500 .kueki shopkeeper c ke pas avhi nakli 500 rupi hai jinke badle mai unhone lady ko 100 ka shaman or 400 rupi diya .or jho dusre shopkeeper le gaya vo unhi ka pasa tha jho unhone as a change diya tha 😊
500 ka hi huaa kyoki jo vo pahle 400+saman 100 rupaye ka ledi ko diya tha vo to dusre ke pass se diye tha., smjhna bhai abhi tk to vo dusra loss me tha n 500 ki note nakli vali dusre ke pass thi lekin jb use pta chla ki 500 ki note nakali hai to usne main dukandar se apne paise mage tb vo main dukan dar jiske pass ledi aayi thi vo us dusre dukandar ko 500 apne pass se vapas kiya aur nakli note main ne le liya apne pass tb vah ghate me aaya na tb main dukandar sirf 500 hi ghate me aaaya bhai smjhe
There is no loss of shopkeeper C,only shopkeeper S has got loss of 500
Shopkeeper S ko jo 500 pay kia wo v to loss he h... 100(item) + 400(return to lady) + 500( to shopkeeper S) = 1000
S also gave 500 change to cit means 1000-500=500
500 is correct.
😮
Maybe the loss should be of 1000rs because shopkeeper ko bhi paise wapas dene padenge na
chilar question
Is case me Shop keeper c and s dono ko 500 ka hua hai kyu ki usne change wapis nhi diya hai
That which is bought with money is cheap.
500 is right answer.
600 is right answer
100( product)+500(change)=
600 ka loss
500 Jo c ne s ko jo asali note diya vah ❓❓❓❓❓❓
Explanation may be more better.
600/-
1000 ata hai
950
500
400 + 100 rs goods
The correct answer is 600
Ese dekha jaye to shopkeeper c ka 500₹ aur shopkeeper s ka 500₹ udhar chuka Dita to total 1000₹ ka loss hua
GIRLS are always brilliant with MATHS !!! 😂😂😂😂.....1000 is correct answer.
bhai itna sach mat bol 💀
feminist didi offend ho jayengi equality ke lia
500 is correct bro
Tum socho shopkeeper S ne 500 diye phir wapas le liye, koi loss to nhi hua.
Lekin lady L ne 0 rs diye aur 100 + 400 le liye.
So total loss 500 hi hua.
Mai bhi confuse tha ki 1000 nhi to 900 loss hoga lekin actually 500 ka hi loss hua hai
@@Light12187 tum hi socho agar 500 ka note asli hota ko loss to nhi hota na. Ab 500 ka note naqli hai to 500 ka hi loss hua na
@@modassirjeelani5480 bro uss 500 ka koi value nehi tha ,, so that's void ,, now shopkeeper ne pehele ladki ko 400 ka change aur 100 ka saman dia ,, uske baad usne dusre shopkeeper ko 500 ka note dia as wo pehle wala note fake tha
@@Light12187 mera dono comment phir se padho bhai
Let's try to solve this
Lady to c =500fake
C to s= 500 fake
S to c= 500. Real
C to lady = 400 Real
C to s = 500 real
900 rs lost . because 100 is changed given by shopkeeper s which he has left.
500 because I am also a shopkeeper
Can anyone translate the answer she gave in English?
Zero loss qki aajkal upi payment hota hai.
This is in shakuntala devi's book