Family Law Contempt of Court Issues

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @ChucksNPearls
    @ChucksNPearls Місяць тому +2

    How in the heck is ANYONE being CRIMINALIZED with No law being broken; no crime being committed;; No charge; No jury of peers, & No Victim????
    Idk!
    This channel is so needed! It's great and I'm grateful!

  • @ChucksNPearls
    @ChucksNPearls 6 місяців тому +3

    ✨Why does "case law" need to be hard fought before it's brick wall, hard pressed, & fully comprehended as TRUTH & FACT to the Best Interests that we "Do NOT change Custody or Suspend Time (sever attachment bonds) without a full trial??
    It's such a catastrophic and debased error that validates & affirms the polar opposite of best interests resulting in the worst possible interests and more harm than any good!
    We're too far, & too long into this "branch of law" to still be playing pass the ball. Trans generational trauma in family systems is so painful & damning on a depth to core soul impact affecting all of humanity & our continuity.
    ✨🙏🏽✨

  • @Legal_Guy
    @Legal_Guy 25 днів тому

    Hey good videos you all make. I would love it if you guys can make a video on overcoming 3044 and Judges legal errors in rejecting overcoming 3044. This is a huge problem in California. False allegations happen so much this 3044 is quite common.

  • @marypetersonma6661
    @marypetersonma6661 Місяць тому +1

    I have a question. What does someone do if the statutes were hidden from the Plaintiff for 8 years

  • @LaQuitaSuggsLCSW
    @LaQuitaSuggsLCSW 4 місяці тому

    How do you write a contempt using counts! Count One- is it what the person actually did?

  • @TeddyShraderjr-h5l
    @TeddyShraderjr-h5l 2 місяці тому

    Contempt is used in criminal matters but it also must be used very carefully. Contempt is assumed not to Exist.

  • @marypetersonma6661
    @marypetersonma6661 Місяць тому

    If a lawyer gets caught by his clients spouse for trying to steal, along with his client the other party's half of a pension, and that lawyer turns around and says, oops that must be a typo. Does saying oops absolve that attorney of any wrongdoing

  • @FredNewsome
    @FredNewsome 6 місяців тому +1

    The third question about visitation orders> They all wanted to say is it themother or the father? Mother do nothing, father arrest him.

  • @tuedaz
    @tuedaz 5 місяців тому +3

    1) Family Law "court" is private and it's purpose is to create contracts/agreements:
    2) Family Law "judges" are administrative law judges "ALJ" not judicial:
    3) Administrative law judges shall conduct themselves in GOOD BEHAVIOR. Threatening violence is not in good behavior:
    4) ALJ cannot be a victim, witness and adjudicate the alleged "contempt"
    People, stay out of these courts and manage your own family affairs!

  • @leahpetitto8819
    @leahpetitto8819 5 місяців тому

    Can I request that a judge hold someone in contempt for every time that they've been proven to have lied in their written statements/motions & under oath in person?
    I always thought that a judge would hold someone in contempt for perjury if they lied to them &or refused to comply with court orders. Especially at a certain point & if that individual continues to file motions & bring the other party to court based on statements that were proved to be lies.
    But what do I do as an individual without representation?
    Also, shouldn't a judge hold an attorney in contempt for screaming at them & telling them that their ruling is absurd?
    Or could I ask that a judge hold an attorney in contempt for that?
    What could I do if an attorney knowingly & willingly lies on their clients behalf about under the table income when just weeks prior, on record in custody court, they admitted to them having multiple incomes?

  • @christianmatthew9404
    @christianmatthew9404 7 місяців тому +3

    I have A.
    Question, even if the judges are the judges sometimes to the parents don't have enough money to pay for the attorney. Why won't they listen because the other parent ends up alienating the child because they mostly abused the other parent to appoint. Were there no longer able to defend themselves and be an involved in the child's life? Why? Why? Why don't they listen? Cause it's not because we're calling them names as judges, but because we want them to listen, because we want to be involved in the child's life. Whether we did something wrong or not. I wonder they don't listen.Not because we're being mean to a show but we're trying to show them evidence of what the other parent has done The?
    Other parent don't want the other parent to defend its involvement inside the child's life.Why emotionally abuses the parent to words?Unable to defend its own identity of being involved inside the child's life as co Parent Emotionally abusive sexual cohesion is a crime I wonder why the judge don't let us show them Because sometimes the parent is emotionally abusing the child. And the mother in front of the child are the other parent in front of the child and they try to get it to work. It's not the other defendant is not able to defend it so and try to say that the other parent doesn't want to be involved in the other child's life instead of the other parent trying to defend itself From within its own identity without the other parent impersonating the other criminally impersonateteing parents identity With?
    Out them trying to silence their voice and not being involved in their child's life

    • @samuelwhitlingum8479
      @samuelwhitlingum8479 7 місяців тому

      Because they don't care about the child or the other parent. All they care about it the money. If they can remove one parent from from a childs life then they cN issue a title IV D order in which the state profits from. Title IV D is a contract through the welfare act giving one parent government funds. They then turn around and collect money from the other parent as profit with incentives...

    • @pfergpaint5473
      @pfergpaint5473 7 місяців тому

      EXACTLY ua-cam.com/video/tecX9fTMmi8/v-deo.html

    • @ArtAbsurdist
      @ArtAbsurdist 7 місяців тому +1

      You should proofread your comment before positing it- it’s all over the place and impossible to piece together.
      A judge won’t listen to anyone hostile or unable to control their emotional state. Given the comment I see here, it’s safe to say your emotions need checked.
      File a motion and try again. That’s all you can do really. Lose your sh*t, you’ll lose your kid.

    • @tommypearson9260
      @tommypearson9260 6 місяців тому

      @@ArtAbsurdist I was about to say the same thing ,Unfortunately even a person showing no emotional distress will still be told to say nothing.
      I've gotten to the point i pray the judge ask if i have something to say even then it's shot down because there is no excuse good enough for why they can't get money from you or no excuse why you lost work and got behind in their world they treat it like a credit card when it's a human being and this is where it's morally wrong.
      The reality of the situation is these people don't care because they didn't get effected (Your Situation) like others have and this is why you have people with no Sympathy or Empathy towards a man in this situation they automatically assume you don't want to pay or trying to get out of the obligation when it really is you have no resources and can't make what needs to happen happen....
      Most Alienated parents are the ultimate losers in the end and nobody cares about the emotional rollercoaster the other parent endured both by State Government and the Custodial Parent especially being labeled a Deadbeat and excommunicated from the very person you had a child with and in turn the child as well.

    • @TeddyShraderjr-h5l
      @TeddyShraderjr-h5l 2 місяці тому

      the child support debt is actually a lean against your alleged property that you are the holder of.the lean is against the social security number we don't own the social security number and they are the property of the Social Security Administration...the child support debt is the responsibility of the SSA because the child support debt is a lien that is against their property.
      Child Support services is referred to as the iV-d agency. It is single and separate from the state... The single and separate organizational unit 45(CFR) § 302.12(a)(1)(i).
      Child Support services is supplied by a private vendor by the name systems and methods Inc,. it is a private contract.
      Your CS case is a bond that is sold in the stock market. We are to believe that we are supposed to make these payments to support our children but in reality it is to pay back a loan that has been taken out in our names.
      All 4D child support matters are civil matters you cannot hold someone in contempt for a civil matter contempt charges are for criminal proceedings. And even then contempt is known to be existing but in reality it does not exist that's why they still have to be very careful on how they use contempt. It must be used very very carefully.
      They are not in law they use non-positive laws and the municipalities along with the sheriff's the police the clerks the Magistrate's and all the foreign they are not clothed in law while working under which was never enacted into law.
      I can go on and on and on but this is enough for right now but if people want to know I'll tell you more. This is a program it needs your consent 100% consent they cannot force you into it they cannot trick you into it they cannot take your license passport or Fine you and put you in jail.

  • @marypetersonma6661
    @marypetersonma6661 Місяць тому

    I have a question. What does someone do if the statutes were hidden from the Plaintiff for 8 years