The MP is living in dreamland. The time to hold social media companies to account was 15 yrs ago! No govt is up to speed or possesses the knowledge to effectively regulate them. Wild West.
I’m sure Elon WOULD accept an invitation from parliament! It’s another opportunity for him to grandstand, chat unhinged BS, tie up MP’s with double-think and logic feedback loops… …will it be remotely productive? Fuck no.
We desperately need to educate youth in particular with the skills to triangulate, dissect and construct knowledge rather than passively accepting ANY single narrative
This interview with Chi shows you just how deep the chasm between traditional politics and today’s "Realpolitik" is and The News Agents thankfully have a firm grasp on both
@Mchelsea2924 you know the UN told the US not to invade Iraq right. So we signed some laws saying that no other country was allowed to prosecute US soldiers for any war crimes committed and then we did it anyway. Your backwater is not of any relevance to our decision making. We've allowed you to think you're an equal for far too long as it is.
If people stop buying his products, his businesses will go under and he will lose his current prestige. The easiest way for people to lessen his influence is to stop using Twitter and buying Teslas. Since no one seems to be prepared to do that, all this handwringing about his “negative influence” is a bit useless.
I flirted only briefly with social media and i didn't like what I was happening. I just turned the channels off. All reputable journalists should simply close down their X account and not use the platform any more. If the only users are Elon Musk and his acolytes the audience will eventually dwindle and die.
You never over look bullies and never over look a member of staff who exhibits social/communication and performance issues because they ‘are brilliant’… you will tear your school, work place or communities and countries apart… the damage will be immense and almost impossible to reverse.
Omg she is so disconnected! Clearly she shouldn’t be in this position. Unfortunately these people are living in different world they have never fully adapted to the current state of the world
OMG That's probably the most intelligent comment you've ever made. Well done! Now go and listen to was said @19.40 - 20.21 unless you want to absorb propaganda from all sides.
That woman is like whistling in the dark, Emily is right Elon Musk could not give a you know what if it doesn’t benefit him or Trump or whoever he’s not gonna come waddling over to the UK and explain himself really naive wake up
Feel like people didn't understand what she was saying. Her committee is planning to investigate social media companies and offer advice going forward regardless of Musk coming over or not. She's simply saying, it would benefit Musk to speak to her committee, not that she's hopeful he will
If anyone has read the biography on Musk by Walter Isaacson …it explains so much !! …and gives a deep understanding of him and his ‘dark side’ …he is definitely on the autistic spectrum …also has various personality defects ..and is DANGEROUSLY when ‘out of control . 79 yr old Brit with American grandaughter and daughter in law ) Crazy scary times aaaarhh
@@greghill7759 I would be uncomfortable with anyone with obvious censorious instincts defining misinformation. Today's misinformation can end up being tomorrow's undisputed fact.
Anyone else find it funny that these two- who talk about everything else each day- seldom ever discuss Isreal’s actions in Gaza? Seems Lewis is the only one who’s actually doing his job.
@phillim2216 Accountable by whom? She didn't use it to apply for the job as Chancellor and it is unlikely that her constituents read it either. Be sensible.
Educate people that Twitter is ridiculous, antithetical to free speech, unnecessary for progress and that mostly bad people actually "use" Twitter. Develop alternatives for the quick notifications for which ppl sometime use Twitter. Thank you for the excellent video.
@@poplarboydavid He’s quite a divisive guy. If what you say is true, I bet you’ll find some pretty unpleasant things written about him on his platform?
There was a filum, 20 or more years back, where some geeza was bitten or tattooed or something but where it spread below his skin and enveloped his arms and FACE, much like musky appears on your thumb.....
@@TheWatchman1893 Agree, although I think it should be more of a warning, together with other European countries. “Continue with this one directional censorship, and we’ll block access”
@@marshallmajor6019 Loud music, less sleep than normal, that kind of thing. Or maybe just ask him to ease off a bit so that we don't have to restrict access to it?
ATACMS/Storm Shadow/SCALP aren't long-range missiles. ATACMS is a short range ballistic missile. Short range is up to approx 1000km, medium range 3500km, long range 5500km, and intercontinental range (ICBM) anything beyond 5500km. This is the reason there's doubt over whether russia used an ICBM or not, since although the R26 has a disclosed range of 5600km, there is also a degree of doubt over whether it can actually acheive this with a payload and if it should be classified as medium range. The press could probably be less hyperbolic on the topic as russia have been using just about every type of weapon in existence on the territory of Ukraine completely indiscriminately, so using a tactical missile system to hit military targets across the border doesn’t come close to anything resembling an escalation.
By doing what exactly ? Stating the most obvious fact that UK turned into Soviet Police State. You are all commies. In 2050 there will be no more Brits running your country.
Mandelson says he is too big to ignore, but ignoring his ilk maybe the best thing, until a credible alternative to X emerges or you could ban x as Brazil did, the latter is unlikely as we are so beholden to the US
A ban is so unbritish. Even though I don’t use X and don’t like Musk, I’d never ban anything until it’s been proven laws have been broken. If we went around banning platforms or apps we are no better than China and their methods for social stability.
A classification system might help. Fact checked posts would have a higher rating. Sources with a bad record for truthfulness would come with an orange warning.
UK Parliament needs to link up with the EU and have a shared, comprehensive legal strategy to social media to force them to behave if they want any access at all to the UK & EU...
And who will decide what this behavior is? The same UK government releasing criminals onto the streets to make way for people retweeting the wrong opinions? Orwell is turning in his grave.
@@marshallmajor6019 They're damaging child development, monopolising attention through mass-released addictive platforms and facilitating abuse and social unrest/ violence with virtually no accountability, all in the persuit of obscene, colossal profit. What were you going to do - ask them nicely??
I think it is important to be clear that Elon Musk's version of free speech is not at all the same thing as its original meaning, for example, in the first amendment to the US constitution. It might seem academic, but there is a huge difference between the two. The first amendment version, which I applaud, was the idea that individuals should have the right to speak out against politicians and government without the threat of prosecution or being killed, as happens for example, in Russia. This encourages reasonable debate - a principle of the enlightenment. Elon Musk's version of free speech is that individuals should have the right to offend each other and say whatever they think, whether true or false. This discourages reasonable debate because if lies shouted on a medium like X have the same value as the truth, reaching agreement about what is actually true is much harder. Musk is against enlightenment, as he has demonstrated by backing uber-lier Donald Trump. It's time that the left and those keen to preserve what is left of truthful debate stopped being so tolerant of intolerance (see Karl Popper's paradox). We need to fight back against the forces that are trying to reverse enlightened debate and pretend that truth doesn't exist, like Trump, Musk and their minions like Farage, and call these people out.
@@timthetiny7538 The first amendment protects the freedom of speech from government restrictions based on the content, ideas, or subject matter of the speech. It does not prohibit all limits on free speech, including by private entities including individuals and corporations. Look it up.
According to Musk, hyperloop would be useful on Mars as no tubes would be needed because Mars' atmosphere is about 1% the density of the Earth's at sea level.
Admirable but a) we all know he’d lie even if he did talk and b) he’s not an engineer, he instructs what happens with the algorithm but he’s not even part of the team implementing it, he’d just pass the buck, if you want to know what’s going on under the hood you need to ask the people he instructs who can explain that
There's about as much chance of Musk explaining himself to her committee as Labour winning a second term - zero😂😂😂 Women is taking delusion to the next level😂😂 I wonder if she wants to buy some shares in a marmalade mine😂😂😂
I assume this comment is satire? given the amount of lies, both journalists and Western governments have piled onto the public in the last few decades.
@@trevaudio You can ban it but the ban won't be 100% effective, a simple VPN service would be enough to allow users to circumvent the ban. It would be extremely controversial also. Instead go after his satellite internet. It is locked into serving the entire globe equally (due to orbital mechanics). It is extremely expensive to operate and that money must come from somewhere. China will never allow uncensored internet service. If enough G7 countries band together and tell Musk to play nice or try to make a profit selling internet to people who earn a dollar a month he might come to his senses. This is no time to start more fights.
Public would go into meltdown, it would be politically unacceptable to ban the public from accessing a platform that's widely available to the rest of the world.
Why is she even talking about this, even if his new role in DOGE is not an official Trump Cabinet member - he would not be allowed to come - a bit naive!
Goodall is lookjnh more and more ljke a ypung Peter Mandleson. The clothes, hair, views, trying way too hard to be taken seriously. Cringe and faux intellectual.
He would absolutely obliterate anyone in these conversations. Because he tells the truth. He makes valid and relatable points and he confronts people with a cool impenetrable congruence. The more he speaks the more his opponents are exposed and humiliated. It would work totally in his favour. BE VERY CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR. He ends careers on the public stage. Lambs to slaughter…
The MP is living in dreamland. The time to hold social media companies to account was 15 yrs ago! No govt is up to speed or possesses the knowledge to effectively regulate them. Wild West.
I’m sure Elon WOULD accept an invitation from parliament!
It’s another opportunity for him to grandstand, chat unhinged BS, tie up MP’s with double-think and logic feedback loops…
…will it be remotely productive?
Fuck no.
And just leave Msm to tell us the truth what a wally.
Brazil did 🇧🇷
We don't need to be censored thanks
I'd call it La La land. Maitlis thought the same..............
We desperately need to educate youth in particular with the skills to triangulate, dissect and construct knowledge rather than passively accepting ANY single narrative
This interview with Chi shows you just how deep the chasm between traditional politics and today’s "Realpolitik" is and The News Agents thankfully have a firm grasp on both
inconformity will not be tolerated
While misinformation was on Facebook!
And factual information suppressed by Facebook and Twitter 1.0 ........ as admitted in Congressional hearings.
Its going to require international condemnation and action to bring US tech companies to heel
With what army, exactly?
Right
@@timthetiny7538wrong tiny Tim
@Mchelsea2924 you know the UN told the US not to invade Iraq right.
So we signed some laws saying that no other country was allowed to prosecute US soldiers for any war crimes committed and then we did it anyway.
Your backwater is not of any relevance to our decision making. We've allowed you to think you're an equal for far too long as it is.
@@timthetiny7538 If several European countries blocked access to x it might send a message.
We have a second amendment that says you won't.
If people stop buying his products, his businesses will go under and he will lose his current prestige. The easiest way for people to lessen his influence is to stop using Twitter and buying Teslas. Since no one seems to be prepared to do that, all this handwringing about his “negative influence” is a bit useless.
I get all my disinformation from you lot.
Eh?
@@originalbadboy32 he's saying this channel is a ....... Tad bias
I flirted only briefly with social media and i didn't like what I was happening. I just turned the channels off. All reputable journalists should simply close down their X account and not use the platform any more. If the only users are Elon Musk and his acolytes the audience will eventually dwindle and die.
We don't have reputable journalists any more.... just "Journo Paigners"
You never over look bullies and never over look a member of staff who exhibits social/communication and performance issues because they ‘are brilliant’… you will tear your school, work place or communities and countries apart… the damage will be immense and almost impossible to reverse.
Omg she is so disconnected! Clearly she shouldn’t be in this position. Unfortunately these people are living in different world they have never fully adapted to the current state of the world
OMG That's probably the most intelligent comment you've ever made. Well done!
Now go and listen to was said @19.40 - 20.21 unless you want to absorb propaganda from all sides.
That woman is like whistling in the dark, Emily is right Elon Musk could not give a you know what if it doesn’t benefit him or Trump or whoever he’s not gonna come waddling over to the UK and explain himself really naive wake up
Feel like people didn't understand what she was saying. Her committee is planning to investigate social media companies and offer advice going forward regardless of Musk coming over or not. She's simply saying, it would benefit Musk to speak to her committee, not that she's hopeful he will
Brazil took twiX offline for a couple if weeks recently.
Couldn't do it now with Trump back in. Take X down and get sanctioned.
Lets all move to Brazil.
@@marshallmajor6019 or just ban twiX in the UK.
If anyone has read the biography on Musk by Walter Isaacson …it explains so much !! …and gives a deep understanding of him and his ‘dark side’ …he is definitely on the autistic spectrum …also has various personality defects ..and is DANGEROUSLY when ‘out of control . 79 yr old Brit with American grandaughter and daughter in law ) Crazy scary times aaaarhh
Zthe single person driving the message is called Mr Anger Emily.
Elon Musk must be quaking in his boots at the prospect of being held to account by Chi Onwurah. 😅😅😅
That woman makes Diane Abbott look competent.
Why’s that?
@@robertjackson140your always confused
He'll tell her to get stuffed
Note Australia are trying to legislate Social Media use by under 16s…let’s all way in on their side!!
Ban all the platforms and estsblish our own publicly owned versions
What's truly terrifying is if trump bases his relationship with the UK on whether or not our regulators give Musk what he wants.
Why is the UK so against free speech
Truly dystopian stuff as usual. The Labour MP was icing on the cake.
Right ? UK became irrelevant …just bunch of commies jailing people.
I would be uncomfortable with Chi Onwurah defining what disinformation is or isn't.
Why?
@@robertjackson140your spreading disinformation because you already know why
And would you be uncomfortable sharing your reasons with us on social media?
@@greghill7759 I would be uncomfortable with anyone with obvious censorious instincts defining misinformation. Today's misinformation can end up being tomorrow's undisputed fact.
Listening to this trio the world of Geogre Orwell 1984 is with us they want to ban free speech
Orwell tends to be ignored. Fascists like Putin, Trump, Musk.....taking over. Up is Down, Left is Right, ..........'posts facts' regimes now the norm!
For UK it is over. Once an empire now just a 3rd world country
Seems to me the chair of the committee has already made up her mind. In what world can that lead to sensible, grown up conclusions?
Spelling edit
He also interferes with irish elections, dublin riots etc.
Idiot.
Anyone else find it funny that these two- who talk about everything else each day- seldom ever discuss Isreal’s actions in Gaza? Seems Lewis is the only one who’s actually doing his job.
No negotiation with Putin.
Why hasn’t Rachel Reeves, been held accountable for the incorrect information on her C V ?
@phillim2216 Accountable by whom? She didn't use it to apply for the job as Chancellor and it is unlikely that her constituents read it either. Be sensible.
Because it's an irrelevant non-story?
Any particular reason why you, as a person, put a space between 'C' and 'V'?
Because the Journo Paigners consider themselves her peers, so turn a blind eye.
It’s Elons world now. We just live in it.
Educate people that Twitter is ridiculous, antithetical to free speech, unnecessary for progress and that mostly bad people actually "use" Twitter. Develop alternatives for the quick notifications for which ppl sometime use Twitter. Thank you for the excellent video.
How would you "Educate" people?
It seems Elon musk can do anything he likes without being held accountable
That's called, just being rich.
@@kriissyy09ify So we’ve replaced democracy with a finance based system, is that what you’re saying?
What crime has he committed that he needs to be held to account for Tom?
@@weswheel4834yes it's called capitalism, and it's reaching its endgame.
What has he done he has told no lies.
This panel is pathetic
Let's all talk at the same time 👍
Asmongold TV
1- Legacy Media is Cooked
2- Legacy Media Realizes it's Dead
3- Have you noticed the VIBE shift?
I’m going to post this to X and tag Musk, he’ll have a right old laugh 😂
You really need to get a grip.
Musk is the archetypal Bond villain. He needs to be dealt with by 007
Bro-feld.
Lammy is 007 AND Spiderman................... so don't worry. It shall be done.
The question is not can Parliament controll Musk but can Musk control Parliament ?
Musk is not anti British. Musk is an advocate of free speech. Get over it!
@@poplarboydavid He’s quite a divisive guy. If what you say is true, I bet you’ll find some pretty unpleasant things written about him on his platform?
@ I’m more concerned about two-tier Stasi Starmer, than I am Elon Musk!
@@poplarboydavid And yet it is Musk who is organising a 1984-style alternative version of the truth.
@@poplarboydavid And you didn’t answer my point, so you admit that he isn’t a free speech advocate?
@@poplarboydavid that must be because you're not Elon Musk.
There was a filum, 20 or more years back, where some geeza was bitten or tattooed or something but where it spread below his skin and enveloped his arms and FACE, much like musky appears on your thumb.....
He should be interrogated but completely in private don't give the pumper a stage to grandstand
@@TheWatchman1893 Agree, although I think it should be more of a warning, together with other European countries. “Continue with this one directional censorship, and we’ll block access”
What form should the interrogation take?
@@marshallmajor6019 Loud music, less sleep than normal, that kind of thing. Or maybe just ask him to ease off a bit so that we don't have to restrict access to it?
ATACMS/Storm Shadow/SCALP aren't long-range missiles. ATACMS is a short range ballistic missile. Short range is up to approx 1000km, medium range 3500km, long range 5500km, and intercontinental range (ICBM) anything beyond 5500km.
This is the reason there's doubt over whether russia used an ICBM or not, since although the R26 has a disclosed range of 5600km, there is also a degree of doubt over whether it can actually acheive this with a payload and if it should be classified as medium range.
The press could probably be less hyperbolic on the topic as russia have been using just about every type of weapon in existence on the territory of Ukraine completely indiscriminately, so using a tactical missile system to hit military targets across the border doesn’t come close to anything resembling an escalation.
I'm waiting until people stop calling Musk Brilliant.
When will this country realise we’re insignificant when it comes to the wider world.
Like Musk takes us seriously 😂
These lot are a parody of themselves, this could be a comedy podcast 😂😂 there is no comedy anymore because these type of pundits are so hilarious
Make sure you invite the head of BlueSky to the same committee hearing
@simonpatkinson And ask them why they aren't similarly doing one sided moderation?
Lol BluesSky is a leftwing eco chamber full of anti free speech crybabies
Can anyone control him about anything? He's turned into a Bond villain.
By doing what exactly ? Stating the most obvious fact that UK turned into Soviet Police State. You are all commies. In 2050 there will be no more Brits running your country.
And if Garage-Farage through Trump, did help towards that diplomatic imbroglio with Elon Musk 😂😂😂
Disinformation is anything I disagree with so see you in court
Mandelson says he is too big to ignore, but ignoring his ilk maybe the best thing, until a credible alternative to X emerges or you could ban x as Brazil did, the latter is unlikely as we are so beholden to the US
A ban is so unbritish. Even though I don’t use X and don’t like Musk, I’d never ban anything until it’s been proven laws have been broken. If we went around banning platforms or apps we are no better than China and their methods for social stability.
Trying to ban X would likely meet a legal challenge in the UK.
Maybe we should do what they do in Authoritarian countries?
America just voted this type out of power. These people care nothing about us low citizens. I'll pray for the next leadership to serve the citizens
I guess Twitter was acceptable, but X is not. And we know what Twitter got up to......................
A classification system might help. Fact checked posts would have a higher rating. Sources with a bad record for truthfulness would come with an orange warning.
Ridiculous
UK Parliament needs to link up with the EU and have a shared, comprehensive legal strategy to social media to force them to behave if they want any access at all to the UK & EU...
And who will decide what this behavior is? The same UK government releasing criminals onto the streets to make way for people retweeting the wrong opinions? Orwell is turning in his grave.
They do nothing about lies on msm media the real problem.
No thanks we have been there still trying to to get out of European court of human rights
"Force Them To Behave".
Sounds a bit domineering?
@@marshallmajor6019 They're damaging child development, monopolising attention through mass-released addictive platforms and facilitating abuse and social unrest/ violence with virtually no accountability, all in the persuit of obscene, colossal profit. What were you going to do - ask them nicely??
I think it is important to be clear that Elon Musk's version of free speech is not at all the same thing as its original meaning, for example, in the first amendment to the US constitution. It might seem academic, but there is a huge difference between the two. The first amendment version, which I applaud, was the idea that individuals should have the right to speak out against politicians and government without the threat of prosecution or being killed, as happens for example, in Russia. This encourages reasonable debate - a principle of the enlightenment. Elon Musk's version of free speech is that individuals should have the right to offend each other and say whatever they think, whether true or false. This discourages reasonable debate because if lies shouted on a medium like X have the same value as the truth, reaching agreement about what is actually true is much harder. Musk is against enlightenment, as he has demonstrated by backing uber-lier Donald Trump.
It's time that the left and those keen to preserve what is left of truthful debate stopped being so tolerant of intolerance (see Karl Popper's paradox). We need to fight back against the forces that are trying to reverse enlightened debate and pretend that truth doesn't exist, like Trump, Musk and their minions like Farage, and call these people out.
You clearly don't understand the first amendment.
@@timthetiny7538 The first amendment protects the freedom of speech from government restrictions based on the content, ideas, or subject matter of the speech. It does not prohibit all limits on free speech, including by private entities including individuals and corporations. Look it up.
@GideonMitchellYT it does actually.
You very clearly have no idea what constitutional law in the US says
@@timthetiny7538 show me
According to Musk, hyperloop would be useful on Mars as no tubes would be needed because Mars' atmosphere is about 1% the density of the Earth's at sea level.
He's welcome to go and test it
Admirable but a) we all know he’d lie even if he did talk and b) he’s not an engineer, he instructs what happens with the algorithm but he’s not even part of the team implementing it, he’d just pass the buck, if you want to know what’s going on under the hood you need to ask the people he instructs who can explain that
They are all locked in separate rooms in scattered facilities and work on small modules only.
Only the great Satan knows the grand design!
I don't think we should be taking Mandleson's advice on who we should be friendly with, he ends up talking nonse sense.
There's about as much chance of Musk explaining himself to her committee as Labour winning a second term - zero😂😂😂 Women is taking delusion to the next level😂😂 I wonder if she wants to buy some shares in a marmalade mine😂😂😂
You've edited this comment, yet it's still a load of nonsense.
What kind of person laughs at their own jokes?
Boycott X
You first.......
You believe you are beyond the law.
UK parliament is not a world body.It has no authority outside it's national borders Get a grip and FO
Misinformation and disinformation is the job of the government and journalist's, not a tech mogul
Journalists*. Learn how to use apostrophes.
I assume this comment is satire? given the amount of lies, both journalists and Western governments have piled onto the public in the last few decades.
Right On!
Chi is out of her depth
I'd reluctantly observe, nearly out of her mind........
Trump and Elon have caused so much mental illness. Emily's TDS is very concerning and she needs to seek help. 😂😂
She hasn't developed a tick as yet though.
Sorry reporters Elon is not a puppet to some billionaires who are funding you to say these things.
He's not on your side either 😂
Is James Bond on this yet?
Can't the UK just ban Twitter? Couldn't they set up a similar type of media vehicle?
Can it ban X ?…..Yes !
Banning the number one news source on the planet would be a tough ask
@@trevaudio You can ban it but the ban won't be 100% effective, a simple VPN service would be enough to allow users to circumvent the ban. It would be extremely controversial also.
Instead go after his satellite internet. It is locked into serving the entire globe equally (due to orbital mechanics). It is extremely expensive to operate and that money must come from somewhere. China will never allow uncensored internet service. If enough G7 countries band together and tell Musk to play nice or try to make a profit selling internet to people who earn a dollar a month he might come to his senses. This is no time to start more fights.
Like in Turkey or Russia 😂😂😂
Public would go into meltdown, it would be politically unacceptable to ban the public from accessing a platform that's widely available to the rest of the world.
From the nation who brought you Jimmy Savile & Prince Andrew...
And Huw Edwards, he's the guy that these 3 worked with but you'll never hear them condemn their buddy.
Are you out of your minds? It’s just not credible. Talk about this stuff as much as you like but it ain’t going to happen.
Why is she even talking about this, even if his new role in DOGE is not an official Trump Cabinet member - he would not be allowed to come - a bit naive!
Yes, yes, yes we need regulation of these biased podcasts. Their views on Southport need to be scrutinised by Ofcom.
What did they say that wasn't true?
@dannyquinn9128 watch it again and reply if you really need an answer.
Goodall is lookjnh more and more ljke a ypung Peter Mandleson.
The clothes, hair, views, trying way too hard to be taken seriously. Cringe and faux intellectual.
This is like playschool. All of you are just playing at being important and relevant. You are not. Zero gravitas. Grow up…
He would absolutely obliterate anyone in these conversations. Because he tells the truth. He makes valid and relatable points and he confronts people with a cool impenetrable congruence.
The more he speaks the more his opponents are exposed and humiliated. It would work totally in his favour. BE VERY CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR. He ends careers on the public stage. Lambs to slaughter…
Another couple of grifters on UA-cam !!
Consumed by their own propaganda !!!
More dribble !!!