either way, the 400ex had more potential in the race. The dam rider was on rev limiter alot and shift speed was pretty bad. but the blaster is a pretty cool little quad
Rider error for sure I have a 400 with an exhaust and it smoked my friends 200 which was ported and polished heavily walked him out of the gate and never seen him again we were both racers so are shifting was on point
Kawasaki is fast but cheap engine Honda is not that fast but the engine explodes to easy Suzuki is ok but it’s not the best Coolster is just bad SSR is cheap Yamaha is the best brand to get in my opinion
You got it all backwards dude. Honda=Most Reliable But Slowest Hondas are fucking tanks and will take all the abuse one can throw and then some I seen one sink to the bottom of a pond completely submerged pulled it out fired right up. Suzuki/Kawasaki Same engines! They are Fast But Prone To Breaking Yamaha A Fine Balance Between the Two Not the fastest or Most Reliable and Very Very Very Cold Natured I've owned tons of shit I speak from experience and my buddy owns a cycle shop we never see hondas in there suziki/Kawasaki is what keeps him in business and once Yamaha's go they go and become a giant money pit they all are great in their own way. I love all 3 but all have perks and disadvantages
Honda Nerds come up with all the excuses to back That Shitty 400 up! The Blaster won! why? it's a 2Stroke! and even though it was stocked the blasters have more potential and better Smooth Shifting which helps speed up the blasters Speeds! 2strokes are always gonna be the Top Dogs of the Atv History!
JoaquiiN Royelo I own a blaster but your dumb ass comment about Honda is priceless! they take trade in the racing sport as well as anyone! if you listen to the shifting in the race you would hear the difference! any real rider could that is not to mention a much lighter 2 stroke that gets it's top speed against a 4 stroke and that was a short race! Your lost bro
400ex is like 28hp stock , maybe 35 with the mods listed. A 3mil stroker blaster is probably around 33. Being lighter it's possible it'll overtake a 400ex
I've had them both lots of times and is very possible for the blaster to out run a 400ex ...not that big of a difference between them is speed and top and bottom end
All the people that think that the blaster can beat a 400ex is on crack I’ve owned both don’t get me wrong the blaster awesome bike but stock the blaster 200 only tops out at 55 mph and a stock 400ex tops out at 73 to 75 mph
@@bethanyhaskiell9116 lmao pretty funny that I work on them and have had about every size EX they have made. Mine and 400exs that me and my buddy’s have had ran 73mph 75 if your lucky. Banshee runs 80 know people that have them. If you actually take care of them and don’t treat them like crap or get one that’s been beat to shit they will actually run to there full potential and get up to those speeds. I have a bored out 250ex that’s bored out to a 300 and it’ll run right around that 60 mark but that fully clocked out and my stock 400 will eat that bike.
No just no lol, if you were comparing same sized engine then yea 2 stroke is better but we are talking ab a 400 and a 200. I have a 2004 400ex with 416 big bore stage 2 hot cams hmf pipe, no air box lid and jets, and i destroyed a hella built blaster. Its not fair to compare a stock bike against a fully built one
But you two wanna know something funny? It's to easy and pleasant making y'all butthurt haha. Probably because it's true? Who knows but don't care, go hate somewhere else.
Charlie Knight I’m not any fanboy, i love two strokes, but a blaster can’t beat a 400 of any kind. If you put a ton of money into it, I would have to jet, exhaust and an air filter then the 400 could still win. Just saying the blaster are not that fast. They top out at like 52
I have had both they are both great machines but in the end the 400ex would always come around a blaster
either way, the 400ex had more potential in the race. The dam rider was on rev limiter alot and shift speed was pretty bad. but the blaster is a pretty cool little quad
TheRealBoy I've raced a couple 400ex and my Blaster shits on them
Come race me buddy you'd get a lesson
For how cheap you can build a blaster they are amazing downside is turning they like to get on 2 wheels a lot lol
Little quad that's always going to be better than a 400 useless honda
Two stroke means over double the cc worth of power learn something
Can hear the aftermarket exhaust it sounds good man
Awesome video though first time I've ever seen a blaster with some work pull with a 400ex and hang/win
Hell yaa i just got a yamaha blaster💪💪
thing runs great!
It says in the description what’s done to them.
Stop using the clutch when upshifting, just roll of the gas quickly and upshift-smoother and faster shifting.
I came here looking for this. This is really shitty shifting
Isnt this bad for the clutch? Can someone explain this to me please
At the beginning of the race it sounded like the blaster bogged a little bit.
Don’t forget, a 200cc 2 stroke is equivalent to a 400cc 4 stroke also the Blaster weighs much less
ThatKidJake not at all I had a blaster and my friends warrior 350 smoked me and now I have a 400ex and it’s much faster
Matthew GAmon yeah I had a blaster I have a trx 400 from 2000 they are faster but a 240 blaster is quicker
@@matthewgamon4130 what year was you blaster?
@@matthewgamon4130 was your motor on the way out or dirty carb
Jesus you guys are so stupid, read the description of the video.
what camera u got ??
Good way to blow it up
The 400ex lost bc of the rider u can here it in the vid, unless the blaster is worked
+SalMoto in deed the blaster it worked you can see whats done to it on the description
Can a blaster with a big bore piston and rabbit wrench hot rod crank beat a 400ex with a exhaust?
$hak Attack atv #8 definitely
No
lures dumbass
0:33 when the power band kicks in
it doesn't have a power band
If you look the blaster wasn't even lined up with the 400 first race
And the 400 is double the cc bro
Look at that blaster winning who woulda thought lol
Anybody with a brain. 2 stroke vs a 4 stroke not even a comparison not to mention the Honda weighs twice as much
@@hell-sol5240 anyone with a brain know everything u said was wrong accept the obvious the 400 is heavier
@@aaronheiser4391 obviously you like most have no idea. Ignorance is bliss.
That 400ed needs a new rider
200 for the win boys
0:33 when the power band kicks in
1999??
the 400ex would win on a longer road .the 400 was still accelerating and the blaster was almost wide open
Nah two strokes slap
Rider error for sure I have a 400 with an exhaust and it smoked my friends 200 which was ported and polished heavily walked him out of the gate and never seen him again we were both racers so are shifting was on point
Clapped a lot of 400 cheeks on my blaster and a couple stock 450s
The 400ex needs carb cleaned spitting and sputtering
what sprockets are u running on the blaster
Steven Hinckle 14-40
Cool thats what i just put in mine. What size rear tires?
18's
oh i have 20s on mine. I'm surprised you got him especially at the top end.
Kawasaki is fast but cheap engine
Honda is not that fast but the engine explodes to easy
Suzuki is ok but it’s not the best
Coolster is just bad
SSR is cheap
Yamaha is the best brand to get in my opinion
Coolster, SSR, TaoTao, etc are all just generic Chinese brands they are all pretty much the same.
You see Kawasaki and Suzuki are the same bikes anymore
We had 2 Honda’s and those damn things would never die
You got it all backwards dude. Honda=Most Reliable But Slowest Hondas are fucking tanks and will take all the abuse one can throw and then some I seen one sink to the bottom of a pond completely submerged pulled it out fired right up.
Suzuki/Kawasaki Same engines! They are Fast But Prone To Breaking
Yamaha A Fine Balance Between the Two Not the fastest or Most Reliable and Very Very Very Cold Natured I've owned tons of shit I speak from experience and my buddy owns a cycle shop we never see hondas in there suziki/Kawasaki is what keeps him in business and once Yamaha's go they go and become a giant money pit they all are great in their own way. I love all 3 but all have perks and disadvantages
A blaster tops out about 53 downhill ...400ex 65 do the math I have had several of each
Montura ranch?
no, naples fl
blaster cooks
Was the Blaster stock bored, stroked??
Hunter Chesser yes stock bore +3 stroke
Honda Nerds come up with all the excuses to back That Shitty 400 up! The Blaster won! why? it's a 2Stroke! and even though it was stocked the blasters have more potential and better Smooth Shifting which helps speed up the blasters Speeds! 2strokes are always gonna be the Top Dogs of the Atv History!
JoaquiiN Royelo I own a blaster but your dumb ass comment about Honda is priceless! they take trade in the racing sport as well as anyone! if you listen to the shifting in the race you would hear the difference! any real rider could that is not to mention a much lighter 2 stroke that gets it's top speed against a 4 stroke and that was a short race! Your lost bro
does it matter that it was a short race? they both were in top gear and the blaster pulled ahead...
JoaquiiN Royelo In the description it shows what they have done. That blaster is built..
Mx history*
Dylan Livingston your really fucking dumb go beat 250 bikes on your slow ass little blaster
Can a 15 year old ride a blaster do they pull up fast
Vroomvroomzack bad machine all around speaking from a 400ex owner they are very risky for a young rider!
Vroomvroomzack they are fun let's just keep it there
Get a banshee
Ben Finlaw ur dumb if he is scared of a blaster then he would shit himself on a banshee
Vroomvroomzack I'm 16 I got my blaster when I was 15 they do pull up a bit but u just got to get used to it
Why do you clutch when you shift lol
So he can power shift I think he power shifted
Because most people don't want to take the risk of things breaking during a dumb race with friends
Bradley Hayes because the clutch is there for a reason 😂
DctheGr8 _ fr he is a dumbass
lunkerhunt lures he is
I used to burn my buddies 350 warrior till 5th
I think it’s hilarious how some of these dudes on here actually think a blaster is faster than a 400ex 😂
Tobie Cochran I’ve had both a 240 blaster is faster for sure but if the motor is stock the trx
400ex is like 28hp stock , maybe 35 with the mods listed. A 3mil stroker blaster is probably around 33. Being lighter it's possible it'll overtake a 400ex
Tony Stone true
I think it’s hilarious how some of these dudes on here actually think that you can’t mod a blaster to go faster than a 400ex😂
DeRpYDrUmMeR I’m talking stock to stock
I've had them both lots of times and is very possible for the blaster to out run a 400ex ...not that big of a difference between them is speed and top and bottom end
find an old Suzuki ts185. a d put the engine in your blaster
Aj Ahner I HAVE THE EXACT THING HAHA I haven't put the engine in though should I
Yea. It made my blaster do 80mph
@@a.j.sgarage9637 no it didn't.. unless you changed the gearing you didn't gain 1 mph
Obviously I did
All the people that think that the blaster can beat a 400ex is on crack I’ve owned both don’t get me wrong the blaster awesome bike but stock the blaster 200 only tops out at 55 mph and a stock 400ex tops out at 73 to 75 mph
Sounds like your on crack if you think a 400EX does 75 that’s stock banshee numbers a 400 might do 60
@@bethanyhaskiell9116 lmao pretty funny that I work on them and have had about every size EX they have made. Mine and 400exs that me and my buddy’s have had ran 73mph 75 if your lucky. Banshee runs 80 know people that have them. If you actually take care of them and don’t treat them like crap or get one that’s been beat to shit they will actually run to there full potential and get up to those speeds. I have a bored out 250ex that’s bored out to a 300 and it’ll run right around that 60 mark but that fully clocked out and my stock 400 will eat that bike.
A blaster loosing to a 400ex, yeah I don’t think so
plain and simple people the blaster is a two stroke lol
No just no lol, if you were comparing same sized engine then yea 2 stroke is better but we are talking ab a 400 and a 200. I have a 2004 400ex with 416 big bore stage 2 hot cams hmf pipe, no air box lid and jets, and i destroyed a hella built blaster. Its not fair to compare a stock bike against a fully built one
the blaster is faster than the the 400ex because the blaster is fully stock
Tejan Ali buddy look at the description 😂😂
The guy on the 400EX didn’t even hit 4 gear and wasn’t even on the throttle my 1999 400EX will eat my blaster 200
What would the 400 top out at just curious as I’m gettin one
Who ever is on the 400 has no clue what hes doing
when the power band kicks in 0:33
that 400ex rider was really bad.
Yeah god damn he kept bouncing it off the limiter..
The 400 ex is garbage 2 stroke for life
No prob porting is free. I did mine myself and my buddies lol and got a bills pipe and high compression head. I eat banshees for breakfast.
Charlie Knight bull fucking shit, my stock 400 beat a ported and polished blaster with reeds, ur just a two stroke fanboy
lunkerhunt lures so you saying your little 4 stroke would win, don't that make you a four choke fanboy?
But you two wanna know something funny? It's to easy and pleasant making y'all butthurt haha. Probably because it's true? Who knows but don't care, go hate somewhere else.
Charlie Knight I’m not any fanboy, i love two strokes, but a blaster can’t beat a 400 of any kind. If you put a ton of money into it, I would have to jet, exhaust and an air filter then the 400 could still win. Just saying the blaster are not that fast. They top out at like 52
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
do as much as ya want to it... stock 400ex will take it... if you know how to ride..