No😂😂😂😂. What i mean is the 4 team playoff had blowouts. The only way it wouldnt be blowouts would be if the sec and big ten would pick their top 10 teams with 2 wild cards. So no boise state, arizona state, smu or clemson. Alabama, ole miss, texas a&m and maybe colorado.
@@universe-ie2mk Sorry but how can Colorado be included when Arizona state won the big12? If you taking out AZ State then how is Colorado worthy who plays in the same conference and couldn't win it? Are you another prime homer? They definitely need playoff reseeding.
We had blowouts in the 4 team playoff. This was one of the better CFB seasons because more teams had something to play for. CFB needed a playoff structure forever
I think 12 from 4 was a little bit much. I think eight would have been fine or even six. The whole SMU vs Alabama argument felt pointless because we all knew that neither of those teams had a prayer of sniffing a national title this year
I thought the same thing; they could have gone to six for a couple of years while we argued about the unfairness of having just six teams. Then someone gets that lightbulb moment and they add a couple of more teams and the argument changes slightly and continues!
That's what college football unfortunately is. Top heavy so you're going to see that as the end no matter what. That's why they should have just left it alone. Let it be the top four and everybody else can enjoy a bowl game. The beauty of what college football was for so long was that we had all these different bowl games and got to enjoy all these terminal games even if they weren't championship level meetings
Every one and done playoff format has blow outs in the first round. Why are so many people surprised. The goal was always to not exclude any zero or 1 loss teams from a chance at a championship. This year was only skewed because so many teams lost 2 or 3 games.
*BLOWOUTS prove that a 64 team NCCA March madness tournament is too much.* *Wait a minute, they do it every year, and it STILL works/exciting* *P.S., Bama got blown out by Clemson in a 4 team era*
That was bad timing. The second he went out, just like most pro football teams, the season was over. Plus they lost the acc title game. Georgia at least won and beat texas twice. They shoulda got in last year.
Last year was only 4 teams. That's why. If it was 12 teams last year then they would have gotten in and probably been destroyed. I can't believe people dont comprehend this.
Every other sport that has a post-season bracket goes through the same thing. The first rounds are blowouts, or you may get one good game. The following rounds are better...or you may get a blowout or two. Why would college football playout differently? I think it's great to see teams having to play an important game on the road or at home instead of some vanilla neutral site. Seeing an SEC team playing up north was a rare treat, an intrastate game between Indiana and ND, SMU going to PSU, ND heading to Georgia, Arizona State at Texas, this is good for recruiting and for fans/players to experience venues they never have before. This show is turning into an anti-sports talk show. They literally hate everything about everything.
Why are you complaining, if it was a four team playoff theses teams would have played in meaningless bowl games. You didn’t lose anything? Just a bunch of first world problems from two guys that don’t follow the sport. Rob watches baseball, talk about a snooze fest, I would rather watch these blowouts than a close baseball game.
For me I think adding more team might hurt if it’s a blow out game every first round of college playoff. Bowl game is different, it’s for the sport fan or team fan. If team keep getting blow out for the next couple of year then college football might be dead. We don’t want college football to be like march madness where more team get in. Yes upset is fine but people want the blue blood/ Rival to play in the final.
@@jefflee1809 Once again, I ask what did anybody lose, just because three of the four games were blowouts this year doesn’t mean it will happen every year. I would much rather watch a blowout playoff game where the outcome actually matters than the Pop Tart Bowl. Furthermore, the NFL Wild Card Weekend is full of blowouts, I don’t hear people complaining about the NFL and your point about blue bloods/big time programs winning or playing for the championship can you name the last time a big time program didn’t win the championship? You would have to go back 30+ years to when Georgia Tech and Colorado were split national champions, so I would worry about the big time programs getting left out.
@@rattlertech You said it yourself “MOST” of the game are blow out. Do want college football to become march madness? Even before we didn’t know if the game were going to be blow out or we kind of wanted the upset but we were fine it top team play each other because it was top team against each other anyway but now people are complaining this team should be in or that team shouldn’t’ when they already expanded the team.
There are some idiot callers talking about Alabama and how it doesn't matter if you lose a bunch of games. There are never more than 4 teams that could legitimately be the best. Alabama got embarrassed by multiple 6 loss teams including a 24-3 beating 2 weeks ago. They would have gotten destroyed just like Tennessee did by any of the teams hosting round one. The only problem with the seeding is giving automatic bye to conference champs. 5 conference champs should be included and the 7 highest remaining but seed based on ranking.
As a buckeye fan and overall fan of college football, i always hated how short the regular season was. Expanding the cfp is a good thing and who cares about a blowout. It'll be 16 teams by 2030
Amen.. heard all that crying and begging from snowflakes to include irrelevant teams so they have a chance like it's pop warner and what happened? All these lesser teams got their DOORS BLOWN OFF in unwatchable games over by halftime, now we're stuck with a sympathy participation trophy tournament.. smh..
Blowouts in college football are completely normal. Look at most of the BCS games, lots of double digit wins and very little nail biters! That’s why I prefer the NFL!
They just need to get the seeding right. The top 4 conference champions should not get byes. Base the seeding off the rankings. There were blowouts in the 4 team playoff so that’s not a valid reason to not like it.
It’s football and it’s naturally cyclical. Next year it could be great games played in all rounds and yall would be saying how it’s better for the sport so just give it some time. Plus there were blowouts in the 4 team playoff. Hell there were blowouts and snooze fests in the BCS championship era.
Lol. They made money. It's not about competition. Even, many times, Super Bowls turn out to be blowouts. Tennessee was safely in as well as Ohio State. It was the worst blowout.
Imo this take is terrible. I loved watching the games even though they were blowouts. Having the 12 team playoffs had me routing for these underdog teams. Every year we always see the same teams compete which got boring so im in favor of the change.
4 home teams won and 3 of the road teams played in a climates they weren't familiar with...BCS playoff teams get blown out a lot. Remember Bama getting mopped 44-16, Ohio State losing 31-0 etc...y'all whine too f'ing much
Makes no sense, more football is good for everyone. It’s the first year and they’ll get this right eventually. Stop being the old man on the porch complaining about dumb 💩
It was the first year of the 12 team playoff, give it a chance
No😂😂😂😂. What i mean is the 4 team playoff had blowouts. The only way it wouldnt be blowouts would be if the sec and big ten would pick their top 10 teams with 2 wild cards. So no boise state, arizona state, smu or clemson. Alabama, ole miss, texas a&m and maybe colorado.
@@universe-ie2mk Sorry but how can Colorado be included when Arizona state won the big12? If you taking out AZ State then how is Colorado worthy who plays in the same conference and couldn't win it? Are you another prime homer? They definitely need playoff reseeding.
We had blowouts in the 4 team playoff. This was one of the better CFB seasons because more teams had something to play for. CFB needed a playoff structure forever
Who cares , don't watch, who is it. bothering. College basketball has 64 teams for God sake.
College basketball has 364 teams so that 64 teams (now 68) is misleading. Similar ratio to other sports.
Is that because of all the lower tier colleges in the middle of no where @MBarberfan4life
Wrong 68 teams and counting with the play in games 😅
@@JohnGoldfarb Yes, 100%, dont watch & take your football home, no one cares!!
Exactly. They should stop the crying.
Ohio State is clearly a team good enough to compete for a title. If we still had a 4 team playoff, they wouldn't have gotten in.
big difference between 4 and 12. Split the difference.
Good point!!
Screwing up games in the regular season should have consequences despite how good the roster is
I like how all the SEC homers were bitching about the blowouts..... until Tennessee got routed
@@dustinrhodes4793 tennesse don’t represent us they ass shouldn’t have been in it either
Right. They were yapping Friday night and all day Saturday. Then Tennessee got curb-stomped and they went silent.
I'm convinced Rob Parked hates sports
He's right, though. 8 teams was enough.
@@Bodhi594nope 12 is better. Watch next year we get a lot of up sets
Unpopular opinion: BCS Era > CFP Era
Rob is the GOAT!
@@GINGOLOGUNGAwhy....
I think 12 from 4 was a little bit much.
I think eight would have been fine or even six.
The whole SMU vs Alabama argument felt pointless because we all knew that neither of those teams had a prayer of sniffing a national title this year
I thought the same thing; they could have gone to six for a couple of years while we argued about the unfairness of having just six teams. Then someone gets that lightbulb moment and they add a couple of more teams and the argument changes slightly and continues!
Bruh people was getting tired of seeing the same teams year after years it was getting boring
That's what college football unfortunately is. Top heavy so you're going to see that as the end no matter what.
That's why they should have just left it alone. Let it be the top four and everybody else can enjoy a bowl game.
The beauty of what college football was for so long was that we had all these different bowl games and got to enjoy all these terminal games even if they weren't championship level meetings
People will still see the same teams. They’ll just have to play more games to get there.
@@Ironman79😂😂😂Exactly what I was thinking.
We don’t wanna hear from a man who said Brady was “washed” for 10+ years.
Tbf, what does one have to do with the other?
This is why taking most people opinion seriously is laughable like what kinda correlation is that@@jerodgraham6623
Rob is the Truth!
@@Rome_22 yeah true ass
@@Rome_22😂😂😂
I think they wanted March madness style events. They're hoping that there will be upsets.
Every one and done playoff format has blow outs in the first round. Why are so many people surprised. The goal was always to not exclude any zero or 1 loss teams from a chance at a championship. This year was only skewed because so many teams lost 2 or 3 games.
*BLOWOUTS prove that a 64 team NCCA March madness tournament is too much.*
*Wait a minute, they do it every year, and it STILL works/exciting*
*P.S., Bama got blown out by Clemson in a 4 team era*
How come G Georgia gets to stay in the tournament with their back up quarterback unlike Florida State last year???
Because ga qb has been throwing 3 interceptions a game and the team covered it up. Fl st offense was centered around 1 player
That was bad timing. The second he went out, just like most pro football teams, the season was over. Plus they lost the acc title game. Georgia at least won and beat texas twice. They shoulda got in last year.
@@universe-ie2mkFlorida State won the ACC Championship game. They didn't lose before the bowl game
We all know the answer. The media and their sec bias...especially espn, who is financially tied to the sec.
Last year was only 4 teams. That's why. If it was 12 teams last year then they would have gotten in and probably been destroyed.
I can't believe people dont comprehend this.
Honestly. It was so awesome to see the college home field atmosphere
Man I love Rob but lately dude complains about everything in sports
Ikr. He’s like the boy who cried wolf.
Lol Lately he has been doing it for 40 years
@@timd4789 lately has been over the top
😂😂😂
“Old man yells at cloud”
Every other sport that has a post-season bracket goes through the same thing. The first rounds are blowouts, or you may get one good game. The following rounds are better...or you may get a blowout or two. Why would college football playout differently? I think it's great to see teams having to play an important game on the road or at home instead of some vanilla neutral site. Seeing an SEC team playing up north was a rare treat, an intrastate game between Indiana and ND, SMU going to PSU, ND heading to Georgia, Arizona State at Texas, this is good for recruiting and for fans/players to experience venues they never have before. This show is turning into an anti-sports talk show. They literally hate everything about everything.
The quarterfinals are neutral site games at Bowl Game sites.
Not in hockey....it's competitive from the get.
Good point!!
It's obvious you guys don't watch college football
Rob got exactly what he was hoping for with these blowouts because now he gets to complain about the inadequacies of the CFP.
You're right because he said this would happen years ago and now he gets to brag about how he was right.
Why are you complaining, if it was a four team playoff theses teams would have played in meaningless bowl games. You didn’t lose anything? Just a bunch of first world problems from two guys that don’t follow the sport. Rob watches baseball, talk about a snooze fest, I would rather watch these blowouts than a close baseball game.
For me I think adding more team might hurt if it’s a blow out game every first round of college playoff. Bowl game is different, it’s for the sport fan or team fan. If team keep getting blow out for the next couple of year then college football might be dead. We don’t want college football to be like march madness where more team get in. Yes upset is fine but people want the blue blood/ Rival to play in the final.
Yep!
@@jefflee1809 Dude 2014 to 2022 in the four game format most those games were blowouts. 2023 was the only year it was interesting and competitive.
@@jefflee1809 Once again, I ask what did anybody lose, just because three of the four games were blowouts this year doesn’t mean it will happen every year. I would much rather watch a blowout playoff game where the outcome actually matters than the Pop Tart Bowl. Furthermore, the NFL Wild Card Weekend is full of blowouts, I don’t hear people complaining about the NFL and your point about blue bloods/big time programs winning or playing for the championship can you name the last time a big time program didn’t win the championship? You would have to go back 30+ years to when Georgia Tech and Colorado were split national champions, so I would worry about the big time programs getting left out.
@@rattlertech You said it yourself “MOST” of the game are blow out. Do want college football to become march madness? Even before we didn’t know if the game were going to be blow out or we kind of wanted the upset but we were fine it top team play each other because it was top team against each other anyway but now people are complaining this team should be in or that team shouldn’t’ when they already expanded the team.
Brother, LSU blew TF out of Oklahoma in 19,20 🤣🤣 what are y'all talking about 🫣
There were always blowouts in the BCS era. That was a big reason why the expanded
People just love complaining….
That caller about Alabama. Should have asked why would Alabama enters cfp when they lost to Oklahoma and Vanderbilt
That Big 3 joke was funny
That was a joke?? 🤔
People like to point to all the other teams. The Vols were better than Alabama and they got blown out.
Meanwhile we have 64 teams in March Madness. Blowouts all over the place. I'm so sick of these SEC crybabies.
Terrible take...
Let’s just put all the SEC teams in so the media ppl can stop complaining.
😂😂😂
There are some idiot callers talking about Alabama and how it doesn't matter if you lose a bunch of games. There are never more than 4 teams that could legitimately be the best. Alabama got embarrassed by multiple 6 loss teams including a 24-3 beating 2 weeks ago. They would have gotten destroyed just like Tennessee did by any of the teams hosting round one. The only problem with the seeding is giving automatic bye to conference champs. 5 conference champs should be included and the 7 highest remaining but seed based on ranking.
As a buckeye fan and overall fan of college football, i always hated how short the regular season was. Expanding the cfp is a good thing and who cares about a blowout. It'll be 16 teams by 2030
Amen.. heard all that crying and begging from snowflakes to include irrelevant teams so they have a chance like it's pop warner and what happened? All these lesser teams got their DOORS BLOWN OFF in unwatchable games over by halftime, now we're stuck with a sympathy participation trophy tournament.. smh..
😂😂😂
Y'all crazy. Notre Dame was electrifying
Blowouts in college football are completely normal. Look at most of the BCS games, lots of double digit wins and very little nail biters! That’s why I prefer the NFL!
Its not aboit the number of teams its the teams that make it. Boise, smu, indiana, clemson, arizona state Should not.of been in this playoffs
Boise St and ASU should have had home field for 1st round not byes
Rob is the Truth! 🗣️
They just need to get the seeding right. The top 4 conference champions should not get byes. Base the seeding off the rankings. There were blowouts in the 4 team playoff so that’s not a valid reason to not like it.
mathematicly they want best vs weekest not top vs top though
It’s a 12 team playoff… let the teams play. Sure likelihood is low but it’s probability. Why can’t people understand that?
6 teams would be perfect and 8 if you want to be nice.
NCAA football has been HORRIBLE to watch...
FOR YEARSSS NOW
How bout this....the first rd in the playoffs....have it at a neutral field. Not a the top seed field
It’s football and it’s naturally cyclical. Next year it could be great games played in all rounds and yall would be saying how it’s better for the sport so just give it some time. Plus there were blowouts in the 4 team playoff. Hell there were blowouts and snooze fests in the BCS championship era.
Don funny as hell
Top 4 seeds no bye if you are conference champ or do away with conf championships(doubt that)
I think its great. The championships havent always been great so what!
12 teams are too many but do you gripe about Bama or OSU destroying Montana Voc Tech A&U 73-3 type games during the reg. season?
Lol. They made money. It's not about competition. Even, many times, Super Bowls turn out to be blowouts. Tennessee was safely in as well as Ohio State. It was the worst blowout.
Negative old men shouldn’t be allowed to give opinions on things
Yeah let’s shorten the NFL since there are first round blow outs. The NBA always has first round sweeps so let’s just take the top 4 NBA teams
Imo this take is terrible. I loved watching the games even though they were blowouts. Having the 12 team playoffs had me routing for these underdog teams. Every year we always see the same teams compete which got boring so im in favor of the change.
DEI media
Coward or a Bot…..show your face
😂😂😂
This show has devolved into idiocy.
You guys need to seriously consider shutting down the podcast.
This is embarrassing
Football about to more competitive and parity. Portal and NIL Make it possible to win
4 home teams won and 3 of the road teams played in a climates they weren't familiar with...BCS playoff teams get blown out a lot. Remember Bama getting mopped 44-16, Ohio State losing 31-0 etc...y'all whine too f'ing much
Definitely not a bad idea
Clemson & Indiana covered 🤷♂️
10 would be ok 12 might be too many
How about no conferences 😂
negative iq take. even the 4 team games had double digit point blowouts all the time.
So the 4 team was a bad idea as well?
They created NIL and 12 teams to stop 🛑 Bama
They created Vanderbilt to stop Bama. And they created Oklahoma to stomp Bama.
Makes no sense, more football is good for everyone. It’s the first year and they’ll get this right eventually. Stop being the old man on the porch complaining about dumb 💩
This show has turned into a “hey kid get off my lawn!!” Show. Do yall like anything?? Just stop watching sports then guys if everything is trash
The 12 team playoff has been trash 😂😂😂 I can’t lie
how
It just started lol
I disagree I've been enjoying it. Plus it just started and we got to see how it plays out.
Let them play it's year one
Alabama would have stomped Penn State.
Facts roll tide
you not willing to bet your life and your daughter on that
They couldn't even beat Vandy
Rob Parker always negative af
Wtf does dude talk so loud..sound ridiculous
Who cares about out Shannon and Steven A take what you give out on your podcast.
Americans really just want a reason to drink. The 12 team playoff provides that experience for them. No need to over analyze this 😂
😂😂
Them players getting nIL money now masta want more games period
8 teams max
Yall are slow lmao. This is why this show is dying
bama wouldve lost in the first round too. stop it
They sound dumb