Fry is undoubtedly my favourite thought leader. Also, can we all just stop for a moment and appreciate how much we're all in awe about pictures of milk splashes?
Very appropriate subject matter for a channel called "Objectivity". You all should check out the prologue to the book "Objectivity" by Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison (2007), which describes how Worthington transitioned from drawings of his visual experience to "objective" photographs. While the photographs reveal a much more particular or even chaotic world, the drawings may have been a better representation of the symmetric essence of the phenomena ("true to nature", as Daston and Galison write).
Ewout ter Haar A very interesting question. What is more “objective", a single snapshot in time, or a drawing that captures the time-averaged perfect symmetries? Perhaps both equally, but in different ways. Thanks for the great and very relevant comment!
I didn't realize that Dr. Fry got her PhD covering an aspect of fluid dynamics, an area that I am specializing in in Mechanical Engineering. Also, cool to see some early work on the field. Awesome video.
Just wanted to mention how much I appreciate Keith Moore in the videos. His contextual understanding of the subjects are what elevate these videos from interesting to fascinating. Thanks, Keith! Also, it's always a treat to see Hannah Fry. I just recently read Storm in a Teacup by Helen Czerski and it reminded me of Hannah (I dunno why), but I'm surprised to find that she is also into the dynamics of fluids. Thanks for making these videos, Brady.
Fascinating. In boiling and condensation, this is very important in heat and fluid transfer. More efficient air conditioners, jets, rocket engines, solar collectors, wings surfaces in rain this science will continue to lead into many applications as we continue to study this phenomenon and here were the first baby steps.
Love the pictures and information from this episode. Any chance of another episode on plants? I just truly enjoy the beautiful old drawings & collected plants/flowers.
Reynolds number is a big deal in fluid mechanics, because it's dimensionless, and thus very helpful in modeling. I did my senior college thesis on Aerobraking around Mars using a dimensionless factor that accounted for the difference between Newtonian and Continuum flow(I forget the name, however) Isn't that kind of ironic😏
Hi Brady - I was thinking about your ongoing quest to find artifacts in the Royal Society collection that have good pictures for sake of visual interest on youtube, and had an idea. Why not, instead of having the videos so closely focused on a handful of artifacts, use the artifacts more as a jumping-off point to delve into a broader topic, and maybe discuss the history of the topic beginning with the artifact, tracing it through to today. Then bring in visuals from anywhere to tell that story. Anyway, I love all you do, so keep up the good work, cheers :-)
I remember studying Venturi tubes in Instrumentation, where there was a lot of fluid dynamics discussion going on. Really cool to see early work about it here!
Haciendo click en la esquina derecha en la parte de arriba de la pantalla, hay un dibujo de tres puntitos en vertical pincha ahi y activas los subtítulos.
Keith is a 2 sentence summary expert. The stuff that guy has in his head is insane. I assume he knows this and doesn't have to do much research before shooting these videos.
They don’t wear gloves when handling most paper. It’s very delicate, and so they risk lesser possible damage from exposure to oils from skin in favour of not tearing the documents.
'These are my favourite droplets in the collection - I don't get these out for everyone'; 'He dropped two balls'; 'a study of splashes'; he's been checking solids'. Isn't science a wonderful thing? If you can just get past the technical jargon.
I imagine it depends on the age of the document and the composition of the pages. They probably weigh the risks of different handling methods for each different piece. They must use gloves for some - isn’t a gloved hand the icon for the channel?
So when do we get a video of Dr. Fry talking fluid dynamics and droplet deformation on Sixty Symbols? Come on, Brady, make it happen for us!
Best episode of the year! So dramatic. I could feel the surface-tension...
isn't it the only one this year 2019 ...
@@htmlguy88 thatsthejoke.gif
r/woooosh
I think the main joke was in the pun at the end.
2:25 "Professor Osborne Reynolds is a big deal in the fluids world."
Yeah, I guess he ... made quite a splash.
I'll show myself out.
Oh, Austin Powers behave!
He really made waves didnt he
0:07 don't you mean public intellectual and thought leader
I was thinking the same xD
Haha perfect!
I love Dr. Fry's enthusiasm! I want more episodes of people looking at the historical thing they earned their Ph.D in or researched upon.
You could have new Ph.D students talking about it!
Yasss! That's a wonderful idea. Please make it happen Objectivity. Alternatively, someone please start another channel that does this.
I could listen to Keith's reading all day
Line of the year - "A roller-coaster through the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations." There is hope for the species, after all.
Why just the two-dimensional?
Oh, now i got it.
Fry is undoubtedly my favourite thought leader.
Also, can we all just stop for a moment and appreciate how much we're all in awe about pictures of milk splashes?
I'm a simple man; I see Hannah's smile, I click the video.
That enthousiastic whispering. That's some great stuff :)
I just have a weakness for intelligent redheads...
The quality of the photos is astonishing.
Very appropriate subject matter for a channel called "Objectivity". You all should check out the prologue to the book "Objectivity" by Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison (2007), which describes how Worthington transitioned from drawings of his visual experience to "objective" photographs.
While the photographs reveal a much more particular or even chaotic world, the drawings may have been a better representation of the symmetric essence of the phenomena ("true to nature", as Daston and Galison write).
Ewout ter Haar A very interesting question. What is more “objective", a single snapshot in time, or a drawing that captures the time-averaged perfect symmetries? Perhaps both equally, but in different ways. Thanks for the great and very relevant comment!
The perfect trio of passionate science lovers enjoying some great illustrations and photos. I'm starting 2019 with a big smile on my face. Thank you.
I'll never not click on a video featuring both Keith and Hannah! 😄
I didn't realize that Dr. Fry got her PhD covering an aspect of fluid dynamics, an area that I am specializing in in Mechanical Engineering. Also, cool to see some early work on the field. Awesome video.
I'm a simple man. I see Keith and Hannah, I click.
❤
Just wanted to mention how much I appreciate Keith Moore in the videos. His contextual understanding of the subjects are what elevate these videos from interesting to fascinating. Thanks, Keith!
Also, it's always a treat to see Hannah Fry. I just recently read Storm in a Teacup by Helen Czerski and it reminded me of Hannah (I dunno why), but I'm surprised to find that she is also into the dynamics of fluids. Thanks for making these videos, Brady.
Fascinating. In boiling and condensation, this is very important in heat and fluid transfer. More efficient air conditioners, jets, rocket engines, solar collectors, wings surfaces in rain this science will continue to lead into many applications as we continue to study this phenomenon and here were the first baby steps.
It's our favourite public intellectual and thought leader!
I love Keith's sense of humor.
Great stuff, these three should have their own tv show 💜
Congrats... Y'all got me addicted to history..
2 days straight watching you guys content.
Just amazing keep it up!
We (or I) need a conversation between Hannah and Stephen Fry
Those pictures are extremely impressive for 1908! Definitely pushing the boundaries of the technology of the day, no doubt.
Hannah needs to be in every video; at least as an easter egg
My Favorite Thought Leader.
Woo, more Hannah Fry.
if Slow-Mo Guys lived 100 years ago they would be making images like that, bringing wonders of the split-second to the masses
Or Smarter Every Day even more so.
Fluid dynamics are very important in sports! There are so many unsolved issues.
The cover on the last book is pretty cool.
Oh would you look at that, it's the famous public intellectual Hannah Fry! ;)
And 'thought leader'...
Ok I’ve seen several comments now referencing "public intellectual" and "thought leader". What’s the background story on this?
@@MegaFonebone Listen to the Numberphile podcast
Venki Phy6 any particular episode?
Love the pictures and information from this episode. Any chance of another episode on plants? I just truly enjoy the beautiful old drawings & collected plants/flowers.
Let me just say.. I love Hannah Fry. And that's that.
For me the best part is when they mentioned Reynolds and she picked up on who he was exactly when I did. Ahhh university days
Ah those pictures of spilt milk. Brought a tear to my eye.
Amazing video! And I love her enthusiasm!!
This science really is beautiful.
Reynolds number is a big deal in fluid mechanics, because it's dimensionless, and thus very helpful in modeling.
I did my senior college thesis on Aerobraking around Mars using a dimensionless factor that accounted for the difference between Newtonian and Continuum flow(I forget the name, however)
Isn't that kind of ironic😏
"Worthington's". The name of a fabulous beer served at the Green Dragon in Hereford!
Beautiful pictures.
Keith and Hannah in first video for the year ... 2019 has started well
2:40 even a lowly biologist like me knows Reynolds
His work is very important after all, especially in cardiology and such.
4:55 That look! 😂😂😂
Hi Brady - I was thinking about your ongoing quest to find artifacts in the Royal Society collection that have good pictures for sake of visual interest on youtube, and had an idea. Why not, instead of having the videos so closely focused on a handful of artifacts, use the artifacts more as a jumping-off point to delve into a broader topic, and maybe discuss the history of the topic beginning with the artifact, tracing it through to today. Then bring in visuals from anywhere to tell that story. Anyway, I love all you do, so keep up the good work, cheers :-)
2:39 I just saw this on SmarterEveryDay!
4:25 "Yeeeaaah..."
- Hannah Fry
I noticed the last books use centimeters units, was it already common in 1908 not to use imperial system at the Royal Society ?
Love this so much.
Dream team trio strikes again!
Obviously the highlight of Hannah's thesis are the figures in section 2.2.: "Air flow over a surface mounted semicircle." Spectacular colours!
I recognize the clock to the right @0:24. I might watch too many of these videos.
I remember studying Venturi tubes in Instrumentation, where there was a lot of fluid dynamics discussion going on. Really cool to see early work about it here!
So, when does Dr Fry become an FRS then?
Who's the public intellectual
I dare say Keith was blushing just a bit!
Buenas, les pido un favor! Podrían poner la opción de subtítulos ya que el inglés de Inglaterra es mas complicado que el ee.uu . ..
Thank! My friends
Haciendo click en la esquina derecha en la parte de arriba de la pantalla, hay un dibujo de tres puntitos en vertical pincha ahi y activas los subtítulos.
a true power trio
Beautiful!
Oh Dr. Fry. Be still my beating heart.
Keith is a 2 sentence summary expert. The stuff that guy has in his head is insane.
I assume he knows this and doesn't have to do much research before shooting these videos.
Saw Hannah and clicked right away
Very good
What was this recorded with? a cellphone? It looks blurry and there are lots of out of focus :/ Otherwise great video.
When the librarian looks like a librarian but the mathematician doesn't
but was he worthy?
5:15 You could use deepfake algorithms to sharpen those lost images now days.
Wait hannah fry is a fluid dynamicist?... why did she defect to math???
how come they aren't wearing gloves?
They don’t wear gloves when handling most paper. It’s very delicate, and so they risk lesser possible damage from exposure to oils from skin in favour of not tearing the documents.
'These are my favourite droplets in the collection - I don't get these out for everyone'; 'He dropped two balls'; 'a study of splashes'; he's been checking solids'. Isn't science a wonderful thing? If you can just get past the technical jargon.
Where does the sun get so much of energy. Empty space. Weird but true. Cold waves on earth. 0.0003 degrees of curves for sun.
Brady, an Intellectual: A jelly mould!
Hannah Fry
Is it me or does brady look a bit like nick offerman
Well, Fry is tall.
Ancient splashes, they have to be as unique as snowflakes.
hello Brady or should I say hello Internet
Huh
Hannah needs to do ASMR!!
Hoarse Hannah sounds like Kathleen Turner
fluid dynamics, a course I hated almost as much as thermodynamics
Why are you handling these ephemera barehanded?
Handing a book and its pages is too risky when wearing gloves.
That seems counter-intuitive...What about the definite degradation that oil, dirt, perspiration certainly inflict?
@@riverbender9898 The reason is that there is a risk of tearing the pages.
@@riverbender9898Also, I think light does more damage than oil, dirt or perspiration.
I imagine it depends on the age of the document and the composition of the pages. They probably weigh the risks of different handling methods for each different piece. They must use gloves for some - isn’t a gloved hand the icon for the channel?
Fastest click ever
Nice Rolex Explorer, Brady. :)
UA-cam money is gud
Anyone else here got "Hello World" for christmas? 😁 📖 👍
maths evangelist
Nice Rolex on Brady's wrist :D
I'm horrified about them using their fingers to smear around on those old manuscripts.
Why would a librarian allow that?
Gloves are worse for paper. Look it up.
@@RuthvenMurgatroyd I learned to use cotton gloves when handling old manuscripts. What could possibly be wrong with that?
@@mwat56
Your hands are no longer as tactile, increasing the likelihood of tearing the pages.
Anything with this beautiful sexy redhead..is worth watching..idc if I don't understand one word...she's gorgeous..i understand that
I don't know what's worse 3 years in prison or 3 years studying droplets.