Interestingly enough, even after Alireza blundered a trap of the rook, he was still completely winning but made one more blunder with g5. That is why we call this win "lucky", and an objective player as he is, we are sure Daniil would agree with that.
aa I think it’s fair to say that if you get a higher than expected number of miscalculations by your opponent, you’ve been fortunate, or lucky. Of course it’s not lucky as in rolling a 6.
Really? So, what, he was supposed to realize, with 4 seconds on his clock, that the position after Kg6 Kxc5 Kxf6 Kd6 was still winning for him, even down a rook? What a load of horseshit, lucky my ass. Plenty of blitz games are won through inaccurate play, that's the nature of blitz. He lost by position, so there was nothing "lucky" about it at all
Look at where the kings are placed after the handshake. If both the kings are on dark squares, it means black won. If both the kings are on white squares, it means white won. If the kings are each on opposite colored squares, it means the game was drawn.
Very unprofessional title. When you make a mistake in chess, you simply lose. No luck necessary. If you miscalculated you lose, no luck involved. The title of the video is unbefitting for an organization such as FIDE. Should be ashamed.
Wow dude, take it easy. Just because you wear a suit it doesn't mean that everyone has to work according to your standards. You also need to learn about titles made to get views.
Ohhh yeah, luck, sure... As if the position of Dubov's pieces didn't count for Alireza to make a mistake or blunder. The title of the vid is pretty lame to be honest.
Keep your eye on Dubov, he represents the very best of Russian Chess. A pedigree that needs no defence. He is a fighter and is not scared of risk. I predict plenty of fire on the board with this young man.
Thanks for the great video, FIDE Chess. Even top GM's acknowledge that in order to have a great tournament, or win certain games, takes a certain kind of luck, regardless of practice. Sometimes it's the 'other guys day', next time it might be 'your day'.
Look carefully at 3:20 when Dubov does castle. Alireza moves but Dubov didn’t hit the clock already. So Alireza didn’t lose time. Is this legit ? Sorry I‘m new into chess so I need to question this.
if firouzja took on e5 with the rook before sacrificing it , it would be a favourable position for him , but he did blunder you can’t say it’s luck like the title
Danill wouldn't be offended by the title. When he recently beat Carlsen he said "I played like an idiot today, but it worked". He is aware that his style has drawbacks, and sometimes he won't qualify for big tournaments at all because of it. He relies on pressurizing the opponent and "milking" a blunder with great creativity and instinct... He dosen't think of himself as a World Championship contender, he's just a real artist of chess... Modest guy too, he wouldn't mind this tite. A true genius nonetheless.
sorry to say but he missed an great opportunity to punish dubov. instead of playing Qh5, he should play rook d1. this move pins knight and stop to capturing white knight which was leading mate in 2 after some exchange on d6 square here is position: 5:21 white to move
Dubov was fortunate (i.e. lucky) that his opponent blundered. If you are in a losing position and your opponent screws up, that is a poor reflection of the opponent, not a good reflection of you. I’m not questioning either of their skill, but for a super GM such as Firouzja to blunder twice in such dramatic fashion is uncommon, and as such Dubov was fortunate.
I put dislike because spoiler in video's name, moreover there is no luck in chess, as long as players are put in equal conditions. It was a brilliant defense with a rook trap pattern in the end
9:03 Alireza would have won if he had played King takes G5. After the exchange for Dubov rook with passed pawn or possibly queen. Alireza had 4 pawns for 2 pawns. Dubov's king would have been late.
No luck here, complete skill. You may argue that alireza blundered so it was luck but I argue that it was dubov's skill with time that won him the match.
This is Alireza's page I guess. I don't think this is FIDE's official youtube. I'm not even sure if FIDE has youtube channel. One thing though, this page's title is obviously in favor of Alireza. I'm not sure if the author of this is aware that they are making an offensive title. Making excuses and disrespecting others ability of winning ang calling it lucky is outright dimissive. It doesn't make Alireza a better player. Better admit that Alireza blundered than calling Dubov's win a luck. Partly yes, mostly because Dubov is also a good player. Also true that Alireza underestimated g5 and lose. Alireza is a good player, but he has a lot to learn and work on. Same is true as a human being. He has to learn to respect. When he played against Magnus and lost, he accuses Magnus and protested. It's clear in the video that his claim is flase. So you see, if he respects Magnus, he wouldn't do that. Magnus is older than hom and also a world champion. So instead of whining and crying like a kid, man up and accept defeat. If Alireza figures that out, his future in chess is bright.
Why is title biased? In chess, if someone makes mistake he loses and if his opponent does the same, he wins. Does it mean that every player who wins does so by luckiness? Not at all!
NubiaRising If you are in such a loosing position against a 2730 like alireza your are very very Lucky if you win. You should put yourself from the dubov perspective.
Wtf? There is no such thing as "luck" in chess! It's either you "win" or you "lose". Firouzja blundered and so he lost, nothing to do with luck! Danill was the better player today because he won!
Dubov won this when he made Alireza take half his time on simple moves like Rc1 and others. If your opponent mismanages his time and therefore plays the ending poorly, it is the same as if you take adv of any other mistake. Alireza can't physically move pieces from square to square quickly enough as in his game with Carlsen when he kept knocking things over. And he takes way too long on simple moves then laughs when he blunders a rook in time pressure. That is psychological weakness. All his mental strength can't overcome his psychological weakness and lack of physical dexterity. People for some reason don't think the ability to transfer a piece from square to square quickly is not a chess skill.
Interestingly enough, even after Alireza blundered a trap of the rook, he was still completely winning but made one more blunder with g5. That is why we call this win "lucky", and an objective player as he is, we are sure Daniil would agree with that.
Booooo! Change the title.
@aa luck exist, but not in chess!
aa I think it’s fair to say that if you get a higher than expected number of miscalculations by your opponent, you’ve been fortunate, or lucky. Of course it’s not lucky as in rolling a 6.
u need to know that who ever makes a mistake loses... no excuses sorry but dubov won n firouzja lost period calsen still the best
Really? So, what, he was supposed to realize, with 4 seconds on his clock, that the position after Kg6 Kxc5 Kxf6 Kd6 was still winning for him, even down a rook? What a load of horseshit, lucky my ass. Plenty of blitz games are won through inaccurate play, that's the nature of blitz. He lost by position, so there was nothing "lucky" about it at all
You can clearly see Dubov saying something in Norwegian before winning.
jajajajaa
Haha alireza probably filed an appeal
And he trows the water 💦 bottle...
I come from that video. Just clicked in this one to see if Firouzja ended crying as he did with Magnus
Hahahah
I find chess games much more enjoyable to watch when you don't know who wins
Why?
Black won
Look at where the kings are placed after the handshake. If both the kings are on dark squares, it means black won. If both the kings are on white squares, it means white won. If the kings are each on opposite colored squares, it means the game was drawn.
i think he mean the title of the vid just spoil who wins
100% true
Dubov is such an exciting, fresh player. His openings receive a lot of attention (deservedly so), but it's still clear he is a very intuitive player.
Sprtschk and he casually wears a balenciaga sweater which i like
Imran Rasyid bro you are the first person to notice this. That sweatshirt cost £1800
Idk why but it’s so soothing to watch Dubov move, he’s so chilled
really underestimating title shame of you FIDE
FIDE Chess is a fans of Alireza.
looks like that! At least I'm not gonna support him at all!
@@d.d.2311 It doesn't matter. He has my support.
Me too. I like all kind of chess geniuses.
That's cos he's playing under the Fide flag now after running from his country
Well he is their first official citizen 😆
how come lucky..
I know that firouzja is winning but he did a mistake.The title is very unfair to dubov I think
Very unprofessional title. When you make a mistake in chess, you simply lose. No luck necessary. If you miscalculated you lose, no luck involved. The title of the video is unbefitting for an organization such as FIDE. Should be ashamed.
Exactly. He made a mistake and lost the game , as simple as that. We can't just undervalue or depreciate.
yes, calling pro player win lucky? what is that mean.
Completely agree. Dubov simply calculated better in the end game and under time pressure. Nothing to do with luck.
. Д у б о в ' !!
Wow dude, take it easy. Just because you wear a suit it doesn't mean that everyone has to work according to your standards. You also need to learn about titles made to get views.
You should change your title. Dubov won this, no luck involved.
Firouzja had a winning game but blundered.
@@Chaturanger exactly he BLUNDERED there is no luck, he just miscalculated.
@@Chaturanger all you assholes here need to say where he blundered.
Its a bloody luck Firouzja is a better player
Lol. Its an intentional rook sacrifice by firouza. He thought he got the advantage but he calculated it wrong. No luck involved.
Up next: "Caruana lucks his way past Super Genius Of The Universe And Most Brilliant Man Alive Firouzja" 😆
Love the way Dubov move his pieces 💗 steady and definitive ✨
But at the beginning we had the wishes of "luck to everybody", what went wrong? 🤔🤔
White rook went wrong. It is rather every Thing than every Body. Luck was not for things I guess.
And "Stap your clocks" lol
Stab ;)
@@MordimersChessChannel hahahaha lol.
@@MordimersChessChannel Starch your socks
I guess in that case anyone who has ever beat Magnus Carlsen has gotten lucky.
Ohhh yeah, luck, sure... As if the position of Dubov's pieces didn't count for Alireza to make a mistake or blunder. The title of the vid is pretty lame to be honest.
Agree
It's just unsuitable. Let's call a spade a spade.
True mate. Throughout the game there was not a single sign of luck.
Keep your eye on Dubov, he represents the very best of Russian Chess. A pedigree that needs no defence. He is a fighter and is not scared of risk. I predict plenty of fire on the board with this young man.
Why spoil result in title ?
8:38 no lucky, Firouzja "blundered" because time was running out
There was no luck there, duvov was so great on his finishing moves
Why do Firouzja fans always cry like Firouzja himself. Lucky win my a**. It's a legit win.
Мне нравиться спокойствие Дубова. Хочу таким же быть хладнокровным.
Thanks for the great video, FIDE Chess. Even top GM's acknowledge that in order to have a great tournament, or win certain games, takes a certain kind of luck, regardless of practice. Sometimes it's the 'other guys day', next time it might be 'your day'.
Look carefully at 3:20 when Dubov does castle.
Alireza moves but Dubov didn’t hit the clock already.
So Alireza didn’t lose time. Is this legit ?
Sorry I‘m new into chess so I need to question this.
probably not allowed
Dubov is one of my favorite players❤️
Dubov looks like the yellow angry bird
if firouzja took on e5 with the rook before sacrificing it , it would be a favourable position for him , but he did blunder you can’t say it’s luck like the title
Ali's expression at the end is priceless!! Great game by Dubov though.
In chess, there is no luck involved, only pure skill.
Title? That's a shame
I lost all respect for Alireza after he tried to screw Carlsen.
Duvob at 9:11 is like give up damn hahahaha
Даня,красавчик!
isn't ilegal to move before clicking the clock? 3:20
i like seeing Firouzja lose.
Danill wouldn't be offended by the title. When he recently beat Carlsen he said "I played like an idiot today, but it worked".
He is aware that his style has drawbacks, and sometimes he won't qualify for big tournaments at all because of it. He relies on pressurizing the opponent and "milking" a blunder with great creativity and instinct... He dosen't think of himself as a World Championship contender, he's just a real artist of chess... Modest guy too, he wouldn't mind this tite. A true genius nonetheless.
I like the stile of Dubov.
If you like his stile, wait till you see his style.
Фируза в один момент подумал что он умнее Дубова но ошибся
Даня браво за эндшпиль, самобытно и тонко перекатал нервного соперника. класс.
еще раз смотрел партию, классно в окончании перехитрил, видел дальше Дубов.
5:40 - Alireza should have played there Q:g4+, then R:d1, I guess
I really wonder from those people who said that Dubov is not lucky, yeah he is not lucky he is VERY LUCKY. Alireza completly beated him
Даня виртуоз
It’s easy to see here how Dubov is a former rapid world champion.
Молодец!
Algún día uno de ellos será el próximo Carlsen, preferiría que fuera Dubov pero puede que Firouzja tenga más posibilidades
2021 y Alireza ya está en tercer lugar, predices el futuro
I do not understand "Lucky" word in the topic. The situation was fluctuating, and Danil finished it with precise moves. What it's to do with luck?
Con un suéter Balenciaga de 2000 Euros cualquiera juega exquisito como Súper Dubov! El genio creativo.
this is what 100 elo points difference look like. nothing to do with luck!
Blitz with a 2-D board split board is perfect
I don't have no idea about the game I love watching it the only thing I know who shake hands 1st lose the game
Молодец Даниил!!!👍👍👍
Anybody explain me-
Why AliReza resigned? He could easily balance the pieces by promoting pawn.. I didn't get that.
Mohaimenul Imam Dubov will give back the rook for the pawn and play e3. And promote either g or e pawn next.
Petition to change the title
Not only a terrible title, also the result is spoiled. Please correct the title by fixing both.
sorry to say but he missed an great opportunity to punish dubov. instead of playing Qh5, he should play rook d1. this move pins knight and stop to capturing white knight which was leading mate in 2 after some exchange on d6 square
here is position: 5:21 white to move
Dubov was fortunate (i.e. lucky) that his opponent blundered. If you are in a losing position and your opponent screws up, that is a poor reflection of the opponent, not a good reflection of you. I’m not questioning either of their skill, but for a super GM such as Firouzja to blunder twice in such dramatic fashion is uncommon, and as such Dubov was fortunate.
Luck and chess are not compatible. I’m a beginner and even I know this. Mistakes and bad decisions can win you a game, never luck.
Please Link for buy chess board DGT..
As an organisation you must be neutral. The title shows your lack of tact and respect towards Dubov. It's belitteling and vexing. Have some class.
Dubov always respect and good 👍..even not win ❤
Dubov beating Alireza in a balenciaga sweater is way too hard of a flex
my favorite playef danil dubov mantaapp
I put dislike because spoiler in video's name, moreover there is no luck in chess, as long as players are put in equal conditions. It was a brilliant defense with a rook trap pattern in the end
Лайк за коммент и ник
@@clashsmash9763 ))
Dobov is the best ever he is the future champ❤
Ура! Поздравляю!
8:45 Why didnt Alireza go with pawn A4 to A5?
blocked by rock
9:03 Alireza would have won if he had played King takes G5. After the exchange for Dubov rook with passed pawn or possibly queen. Alireza had 4 pawns for 2 pawns. Dubov's king would have been late.
Dubov é muito talentoso
No luck here, complete skill. You may argue that alireza blundered so it was luck but I argue that it was dubov's skill with time that won him the match.
God dammit man Dubov and his Balenciaga sweater
Wish i had one like his
Why didn't firouzja captured the h6 pawn when danil pushed it??....plz someone answer
Winner's capital letter is appeared un the left side of the chessboard in 3:50! LOL
This is Alireza's page I guess. I don't think this is FIDE's official youtube. I'm not even sure if FIDE has youtube channel.
One thing though, this page's title is obviously in favor of Alireza. I'm not sure if the author of this is aware that they are making an offensive title.
Making excuses and disrespecting others ability of winning ang calling it lucky is outright dimissive. It doesn't make Alireza a better player.
Better admit that Alireza blundered than calling Dubov's win a luck. Partly yes, mostly because Dubov is also a good player. Also true that Alireza underestimated g5 and lose.
Alireza is a good player, but he has a lot to learn and work on. Same is true as a human being. He has to learn to respect. When he played against Magnus and lost, he accuses Magnus and protested. It's clear in the video that his claim is flase.
So you see, if he respects Magnus, he wouldn't do that. Magnus is older than hom and also a world champion. So instead of whining and crying like a kid, man up and accept defeat.
If Alireza figures that out, his future in chess is bright.
Молодец Алиреза, переиграл полностью,один ход испортил всю его прекрасную игру.
Какой ход? Не сильно разбираюсь прост
Any a coincidence is not coincidence He worked and deserve to win so you’re wrong please change your title
Daniil fooled him, very clever
Dubov is so strong even against genius like Alireza.
I love the smile at the end even tho he lost
Why is title biased?
In chess, if someone makes mistake he loses and if his opponent does the same, he wins.
Does it mean that every player who wins does so by luckiness?
Not at all!
My two favorite young chess players💥 I like them, and I have no complaint with the title.
Because you don't understand the problem in the title.
Fatimah azzahra
Change your title! Dubov won... mistakes should always be capitalized on (a win), and a failure to do so is (a loss).
NubiaRising If you are in such a loosing position against a 2730 like alireza your are very very Lucky if you win. You should put yourself from the dubov perspective.
@@Narmanostardoll Maybe you just wanted Alireza to win so bad, that you said another young super GM (Dubov) won by luck... maybe
Please, don't say the result in the title
stop announcing the winner in the title
Dubov looks like he just finished washing the dishes.
Dubov playing fearless
Why do they always write a check at the end of every match?
FIDE Rating 2736 in blitz and a unknown guy says "lucky win". Of course, of course.
Very lucky win of Dubov indeed. Alireza has fallen into simple tactic
His fault!
Dubov always dripping so hard
Will Firouzja cry again here?
Is it legal to change hands in the game?
I'm wondering did Ali hear Dubov speaking Russian in the endgame?
Thumbs down because of your unfair title
dislike for title. unsubscribe.
you really gona spoiler in the title?
unf
Alireza made a mistake and that’s not a luck for dubov.
Wtf? There is no such thing as "luck" in chess! It's either you "win" or you "lose". Firouzja blundered and so he lost, nothing to do with luck! Danill was the better player today because he won!
I like dubov playgame
Dubov won this when he made Alireza take half his time on simple moves like Rc1 and others. If your opponent mismanages his time and therefore plays the ending poorly, it is the same as if you take adv of any other mistake. Alireza can't physically move pieces from square to square quickly enough as in his game with Carlsen when he kept knocking things over. And he takes way too long on simple moves then laughs when he blunders a rook in time pressure. That is psychological weakness. All his mental strength can't overcome his psychological weakness and lack of physical dexterity. People for some reason don't think the ability to transfer a piece from square to square quickly is not a chess skill.
That wasnt luck
...Yes it was
@@stopwritingthatreplyjohnat6638 no it wasn't
he was winning and then