Thx! Giving myself crash course on eeg to be able to understand elderly parents test results (brain hemorrhage, neurologist monitoring for seizures). Your videos very helpful even to novice with no medical background. I am easily able to understand everything you've taught, as you present it so effectively. Been watching many of your videos.
I recently watched your video on EEG, and I wanted to thank you for the clear and informative explanation. It really helped deepen my understanding of how EEG can be used to study cognitive processes. I am currently conducting research on the impact of AI on student motivation, specifically using the Self-Determination Theory (SDT), which focuses on three key components: Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness. My question is whether EEG could be effectively used to analyze brain activity in relation to these three components when students are engaged in AI-based tasks. Specifically, could EEG data provide insights into how these motivational elements are influenced or activated during interactions with AI? Your expertise would be incredibly helpful, and I would be grateful for any advice or recommendations you might have on how to approach this in my study.
Does the secondary current represent the actual moving of positive ions to the negative charged pole?? Does the sodium for example in reality travels along these lines?
Thanks. It was helpful. Hey could you clear my following confusion? We know that ERN is sharp negative potential observed corresponding to an incorrect response in tasks. For example, there is two button, red and green. Now, I am ordered to press 'green button' but I pressed 'red button' by mistake. As a result, there will be sharp rise in potentials which we call ERN right? However, say I am ordered to press green button, and I pressed green (correct response) but the green button is not working. As a result, will there be any rise in potentials? If yes, can we call that ERN as well? Because in the second case, my response was correct but the error was in the machine, but I may get excited after not seeing the expected result after pressing a button that is malfunctioning.
just a comment: from your explanation your IPSP dipoles are surface negative and your EPSP dipoles are surface positive with current consequently flowing in opposite direction in their respective dipoles. how can then their potential summate in this case? will they not cancel out each other? to my understanding these dendrites should be first radial and their dipoles be either surface positive or negative all together to summate and be recorded. perhaps you should have added that the IPSP electrochemical changes are distal and the EPSP are proximal with opposite sinks and sources. the electrode being unable to discriminate what comes from IPSP and what comes from EPSP, but both their dipoles must be surface positive or negative otherwise their potential will cancel out and nothing will be recorded by the scalp electrodes. Can you also add that the potential that is recorded comes only from the electric field created by the charge of the dipole facing the brain surface whether positive or negative, the opposite charge of the dipole if the dipole is radial is facing the inferior part of the brain and is therefore not possible to be recorded by scalp electrodes on a routine scalp EEG recording.
You are absolutely right. The dipoles should be surface positive or negative to summate. This brief tutorial was meant to give a very general idea about the generation of EEG. It would not be possible to add all the details in a brief tutorial. Thanks for your feedback.
So is the wave we see in the EEG a result of the extracellular polarity switching back and forth between negative and positive due to fluctuating levels of IPSPs and EPSPs being detected by both electrodes in the channel?
Thx! Giving myself crash course on eeg to be able to understand elderly parents test results (brain hemorrhage, neurologist monitoring for seizures).
Your videos very helpful even to novice with no medical background. I am easily able to understand everything you've taught, as you present it so effectively. Been watching many of your videos.
This is one of the best online EEG resources I have come across!
Thank you for your kind words.
I agreed 👍.
Thank you for this. I just taking a crash course in neuroanatomy and couldn’t wrap my head around this concept. You simplified it soo much! Thank you!
You are very welcome :)
Thank you for what you're doing Sir. Much appreciated !
Always practice fundamentals!
This was awesome, you eloquently explained. Thank you
Glad it was helpful!
im a desginer trying to use eeg in my research. your videos are extremely helpful
Awesome! Thank you!
Thank you! from Brazil: Obrigada!
Well explained thank you sir
It was a very lucid presentation, thank you Sir.will you please explain the dipole concepts and types of dipoles and their importance
I recently watched your video on EEG, and I wanted to thank you for the clear and informative explanation. It really helped deepen my understanding of how EEG can be used to study cognitive processes.
I am currently conducting research on the impact of AI on student motivation, specifically using the Self-Determination Theory (SDT), which focuses on three key components: Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness.
My question is whether EEG could be effectively used to analyze brain activity in relation to these three components when students are engaged in AI-based tasks. Specifically, could EEG data provide insights into how these motivational elements are influenced or activated during interactions with AI?
Your expertise would be incredibly helpful, and I would be grateful for any advice or recommendations you might have on how to approach this in my study.
Thank you so much!
OUTSTANDING
brilliantly explained !!!!
Thank you!
Thankyousm for this lecture 🙏🏻
My pleasure 😊
Amazing keep going❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Can you please do a tutorial on the ACNS 2021 critical care EEG terminology as well?
Maybe one of the future tutorials. Thanks for the suggestion!
how does the extracellular current "flow" ? inside a cell, there are axons for that, but how is it in the extracellular area ?
This is the best explanation, thank you so much!
You're very welcome!
Excellent video!!!!
Thats really good
Well explained thank you
You're welcome
why is the dipole going from + to - normally it should be the other way around?
What can protect or block our EEG waves?
Does the secondary current represent the actual moving of positive ions to the negative charged pole?? Does the sodium for example in reality travels along these lines?
Thanks. It was helpful. Hey could you clear my following confusion? We know that ERN is sharp negative potential observed corresponding to an incorrect response in tasks. For example, there is two button, red and green. Now, I am ordered to press 'green button' but I pressed 'red button' by mistake. As a result, there will be sharp rise in potentials which we call ERN right? However, say I am ordered to press green button, and I pressed green (correct response) but the green button is not working. As a result, will there be any rise in potentials? If yes, can we call that ERN as well? Because in the second case, my response was correct but the error was in the machine, but I may get excited after not seeing the expected result after pressing a button that is malfunctioning.
Your videos are short and very informative, I think you have to make more videos, the animation is very nice ,many thanks.
Thank you, I will
Thank you sir
Thank you for this helpful video : )🤩
You’re welcome 😊
just a comment: from your explanation your IPSP dipoles are surface negative and your EPSP dipoles are surface positive with current consequently flowing in opposite direction in their respective dipoles. how can then their potential summate in this case? will they not cancel out each other? to my understanding these dendrites should be first radial and their dipoles be either surface positive or negative all together to summate and be recorded. perhaps you should have added that the IPSP electrochemical changes are distal and the EPSP are proximal with opposite sinks and sources. the electrode being unable to discriminate what comes from IPSP and what comes from EPSP, but both their dipoles must be surface positive or negative otherwise their potential will cancel out and nothing will be recorded by the scalp electrodes. Can you also add that the potential that is recorded comes only from the electric field created by the charge of the dipole facing the brain surface whether positive or negative, the opposite charge of the dipole if the dipole is radial is facing the inferior part of the brain and is therefore not possible to be recorded by scalp electrodes on a routine scalp EEG recording.
You are absolutely right. The dipoles should be surface positive or negative to summate. This brief tutorial was meant to give a very general idea about the generation of EEG. It would not be possible to add all the details in a brief tutorial. Thanks for your feedback.
@@EEGucation many thanks.
Thank you. A very good tutorial that has helped me to understand more.
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you so much
Thank you very much, very helpful :)
Truly Amazing 👏
Thanks.
Thank you!
You're welcome!
So is the wave we see in the EEG a result of the extracellular polarity switching back and forth between negative and positive due to fluctuating levels of IPSPs and EPSPs being detected by both electrodes in the channel?
Yes EEG is a summation of EPSPs and IPSPs.
@@EEGucation Thank you for your work!
Amazing video really and very clear! thank you so much for sharing knowledge!
You're very welcome!
thanks for sharing🌺🌺🌺🌺
Thankyou so much sir!
Most welcome!
God bless you
Thanks for the info :)
My pleasure!
Спасибо, очень полезно!
Спасибо
ultra bien expliqué
Merci
Hello, realy apreciate your effort, .i realy want to know about you, whi are you , plz introduced yourself.
www.ualberta.ca/medicine/about/people/details.html?n=Nizam-Ahmed
thank u
You're welcome!
Nice use of Comic Sans!😂🤣
Explained in nutshell.
Simplified