Recapping 007 #7 - Diamonds Are Forever (1971) (Review)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 867

  • @ΜακηςΛ-ε5ρ
    @ΜακηςΛ-ε5ρ 4 роки тому +82

    The king is dead. May his memory live forever. Sean Connery 25 August 1930 - 31 October 2020

  • @dvon1097
    @dvon1097 5 років тому +150

    Diamonds is my guilty pleasure bond film. I know it's ridiculous and over the top but its so funny and entertaining.

    • @Herr.P
      @Herr.P 4 роки тому +6

      Thats how a Bond movie should be my friend.

    • @Herr.P
      @Herr.P 4 роки тому

      @Zak Jansen Yeah it shows us hes really just pathetic human being.

    • @markmerzweiler909
      @markmerzweiler909 4 роки тому +7

      I look at it the same way!

    • @scottknode898
      @scottknode898 4 роки тому +5

      I am the same way it is not my favorite Bond film but is a guilty pleasure as was On Her Majesty’s Secret Service and The Man With The Golden Gun.

    • @charlierichards5865
      @charlierichards5865 3 роки тому +7

      My guilty pleasure is 100% A View To A Kill

  • @bittercaramel7652
    @bittercaramel7652 4 роки тому +57

    Not gonna lie but “Diamonds Are Forever” is one of my guilty pleasure movies.

    • @tek6423
      @tek6423 Рік тому +5

      Nothing wrong with that…..Jill St. John made it all worthwhile.

    • @199019852007
      @199019852007 Рік тому +1

      ​@@tek6423she bats above her average as they sat in cricket and baseball

    • @samsmiff-w6s
      @samsmiff-w6s Рік тому +1

      Same here

    • @shiptj01
      @shiptj01 11 місяців тому

      Hi.

  • @HLHReviews
    @HLHReviews 5 років тому +82

    Fun fact: The actor who played Mr. Wint, Bruce Glover, is the father of Crispin Glover, who is obviously best known for playing George McFly in Back to the Future.

    • @b.chaline4394
      @b.chaline4394 5 років тому +3

      HunterLewis726 just saw an interview of Crispin yesterday - he looks so much like his dad now !!! I half expected him to drop a random « bomBE surprise » halfway through the conversation !

    • @pedrofelipepamplona1944
      @pedrofelipepamplona1944 4 роки тому +2

      Wow ! Thanks for the information ! They do lookalike.

    • @johnellizz
      @johnellizz 4 роки тому +1

      That's COOL and is infinitely beyond being a merely 'fun fact'.

    • @TheAeroAvatar
      @TheAeroAvatar 4 роки тому +3

      Pretty heavy huh? ;)

  • @1totalhitman
    @1totalhitman 9 років тому +171

    I like Roger Moore, but I like to imagine how George Lazenby would have performed in 6 other films. I also prefer Telly Savalas as Blofeld. The guy had charisma!

    • @Seargent363
      @Seargent363 9 років тому +33

      +TotalHitman And such a presence on screen. I always wonder what Diamonds are Forever could have been under Lazenby, I wish I lived in that universe.

    • @MrJohnlennon007
      @MrJohnlennon007 6 років тому +11

      Lazenby is the best!

    • @christopherthorne8133
      @christopherthorne8133 5 років тому +13

      Charles Gray was so miscast for this given he plays Blofeld nothing like the other two. They should have just hired another bald actor more in line with Savalas or Pleasance. I get that Blofeld changed himself to go undercover but fuck me, not Gray lol.

    • @eggbertinkabod1121
      @eggbertinkabod1121 5 років тому +1

      @@Seargent363 BLACK POWER

    • @eggbertinkabod1121
      @eggbertinkabod1121 5 років тому

      @@MrJohnlennon007 YO MOTHER IZ DUH BEST , SHE A GUD LAY.

  • @hkr0065
    @hkr0065 5 років тому +251

    *OHMSS writers* : "Lazenby is new, so lets just write the best damn movie we can and people will ignore him."
    *DAF writers* : "Connery's back, so let's phone it in like always. He'll carry the movie.

    • @DutchBondFan
      @DutchBondFan  5 років тому +41

      Spot on!!!

    • @ΜακηςΛ-ε5ρ
      @ΜακηςΛ-ε5ρ 5 років тому +18

      I think with Lazenby O.H.M.S.S. is done more as a love story, than a Bond film.
      D.A.F. was made as a sequel of ''You Only Live Twice'', and has same style with ''Live and Let Die'' and ''The Man with the Golden Gun''.

    • @adriansherlockdamondark.1094
      @adriansherlockdamondark.1094 5 років тому +27

      Exactly my thoughts. It's like they were so terrified people would not like a Bond film without Connery, they went all out to give Lazenby the best script, best action, best stunts, best Bond girl, best villain, best John Barry score, best ever damn thing, to surround him with maximum support. When Connery returned... wow... it really felt like they took a well-earned vacation.

    • @steevrawjers
      @steevrawjers 4 роки тому +1

      hkr006 loLLLLL

    • @steevrawjers
      @steevrawjers 4 роки тому +1

      MYNEXTPHASE lol true it reminds me of when Marcia Brady helped that wallflower become a popular girl topping it off with writing for her the best speech ever
      Then when Marcia had to go up against that same girl in the speech forum her own speech fell flat in comparison

  • @johnjamele
    @johnjamele 4 роки тому +79

    This was soooo much a Roger Moore Bond film inexplicably starring Sean Connery.

    • @bonghunezhou5051
      @bonghunezhou5051 3 роки тому +5

      Au contraire; Roger carried on the tone initiated by Sean in the first 007 film of the 1970s - at least for his first 2 to 4 entries.

    • @ΜακηςΛ-ε5ρ
      @ΜακηςΛ-ε5ρ 3 роки тому

      @@bonghunezhou5051 I agree, but for the first 2 films of Moore (especcially the second). This he had also said director Lewis Gilbert 5.29 - 5.59 ua-cam.com/video/9kbTlgF-YcY/v-deo.html

    • @henrykujawa4427
      @henrykujawa4427 2 роки тому +1

      Tom Mankiewicz was involved in the writing of "DIAMONDS", "LALD" and "GOLDEN GUN" back-to-back. I rank all 3 as terrible, though I tolerate "LIVE AND LET DIE" simply because, unlike the other two, that one is actually FUNNY.
      Guy Hamilton is mostly known for comedy-- apart from "GOLDFINGER", his I like his NON-Bond films WAYYYY better. Especially "THE DEVIL'S DISCIPLE" and "EVIL UNDER THE SUN". Oh yeah, and "FORCE 10 FROM NAVARONE".

    • @thursoberwick1948
      @thursoberwick1948 2 роки тому +3

      @@henrykujawa4427 I like Man with the Golden Gun. Christopher Lee, Asian locations etc.

    • @daxmiller35
      @daxmiller35 2 роки тому +2

      @@henrykujawa4427 very true. The early 70s were pretty terrible for Bond films

  • @rogerhwerner6997
    @rogerhwerner6997 5 років тому +26

    The gangster to the left of Bond sitting in the car makes an appearance as the same gangster in the precredit sequence of The Man with the Golden Gun.

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 2 роки тому

      And the gangster in the back seat later went on to be "Captain Spaulding" in Rob Zombie's "The Devil's Rejects".

  • @markcrorigan554
    @markcrorigan554 5 років тому +13

    I know that this movie could be a lot better but for me, it’s such a guilty pleasure, I absolutely love Diamonds are Forever.

  • @mikefordguy3364
    @mikefordguy3364 2 роки тому +10

    This is may favorite of the series. Love the cars and the cheesy jokes. My car club had a gathering in Rehoboth beach back in 2005. It was themed James Bond drives to Rehoboth. One of the members had the exact yellow car Bond drove onto the hover craft. We had a dinner party with several Bonds, one Blowfeild in drag and another as the real Blowfeild. Plus an assorted cast even the Egyptian guy at the rolete wheel. It truly was a blast!

  • @gussiejives
    @gussiejives 2 роки тому +17

    As miscast as Charles Gray was in this, I’ll always love him as the Criminologist in Rocky Horror and as Sherlock Holmes’s brother Mycroft in the Granada TV series.

    • @thursoberwick1948
      @thursoberwick1948 2 роки тому

      Oh, he's good in some roles. Sand with Dalton. I like Dalton in many roles but not as Bond.

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 2 роки тому

      @@thursoberwick1948 Well, let's face it, none of them live up to Connery. How can they, he created the role!

    • @Yngvarfo
      @Yngvarfo Рік тому +1

      He also played Mycroft in the movie "The Seven Percent Solution," which had no other actors in common with the Jeremy Brett series. It seems like lots of people saw him as natural for the role.

    • @zacmumblethunder7466
      @zacmumblethunder7466 Рік тому

      He was brilliant in "The Devil Rides Out".

  • @CommanderSuberox
    @CommanderSuberox 4 роки тому +20

    I actually really love this movie its cheesey and so over the top its a guilty pleasure I recently rewatched this with my wife and her never seeing this movie before she just thought it was ridiculous and would just question every stupid plot point it just made me love the film even more with how we laughed at the film.

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 2 роки тому

      My niece absolutely loathes "Meet the Spartans" when we watched it, so, naturally, the very next night, her husband and I forced her to watch it again, haha.

  • @declansheehan1768
    @declansheehan1768 7 років тому +23

    In a weird way I find it strangely funny (even though I probably shouldn't) that after YOLT Eon were like "Bond is bigger than the actor who plays him" and then after just one film without Connery United Artists were like "We need Sean back."

    • @DutchBondFan
      @DutchBondFan  7 років тому +6

      Hahaha yeah. It's mainly because George didn't manage to proof to the world that there really was life after Sean Connery. It's not just Lazenby's fault though, in his defence. It wasn't untill Roger Moore that the point was made that another actor could indeed be succesful with it. (At least in my opinion)

  • @jordan31176
    @jordan31176 5 років тому +12

    I recently watched Dr No. I've never really sat threw it all before, it's usually just on in the background. But I was surprised how well made it was for the time, it's actually aged better than most Bond films. There is one dated green screen effect but that's all. It's well edited, directed and acted with some fantastic special effects.

    • @reuvengershon6625
      @reuvengershon6625 5 років тому +6

      Of course. That's why it's a classic

    • @markmerzweiler909
      @markmerzweiler909 4 роки тому +3

      It was also quite restrained...Bond had no gadgets at all.

  • @lw3646
    @lw3646 3 роки тому +12

    Thankfully Ian Fleming never had to see this.

  • @RW__-oi8nr
    @RW__-oi8nr 7 років тому +16

    I also think diamonds at forever is a really decent film

  • @flashrobbie
    @flashrobbie 4 роки тому +8

    Lana Wood's sister Natalie was married to Robert Wagner. After her death he married Jill St John.

    • @chrischeshire6528
      @chrischeshire6528 5 місяців тому

      Jill St John, Stefanie Powers and Natalie Wood all attended the same school in San Francisco when they were 7 years old. Natalie and Jill both were married to Robert Wagner and Stefanie was married to him in Hart to Hart.

  • @1wwtom
    @1wwtom 2 роки тому +10

    Still one of my Fav Bond flicks. Much lighter after all it was the '70's! Willard Whyte was an obvious reference to Howard Hughes who was buying up LV properties at the time. Vegas fans will like the Old Fremont Street scenes and note that the Plaza was still under construction at the time at the end of the street. The Whyte House where Bond does his climbing act was the old Hilton off strip where Elvis was in residence and is now the Westgate. The Circus Circus still had the aerial performers over the casino into the 2000's and their Slot playing Elephant was an attraction at one time. Overall still a Fun flick that I still watch now and again.

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 2 роки тому

      That elephant was for real? I always thought it was just a dumb gag ala the double-taking pigeon from Moonraker. You learn something new every day.

  • @SolarDragon007
    @SolarDragon007 8 років тому +28

    As flawed is Live and Let Die is, it was an ENORMOUS improvement over this film.

    • @DutchBondFan
      @DutchBondFan  8 років тому +12

      +SolarDragon007 Pretty much every Bond that came prior to this was an improvement over this film! ;p

  • @declansheehan1768
    @declansheehan1768 7 років тому +69

    You know what I don't get? Why did they feel the need to scrap the revenge aspect just because Lazenby wouldn't be returning?

    • @postersandstuff
      @postersandstuff 7 років тому +21

      Because producers felt that OHMSS wasn't that much of a hit so they went back to the more outlandish/OTT Bond like seen in GF. To many casual fans this is the Bond they prefer usually.

    • @fuzzydunlop7928
      @fuzzydunlop7928 6 років тому +11

      I think it has to do with how Connery played Bond.

    • @ΜακηςΛ-ε5ρ
      @ΜακηςΛ-ε5ρ 5 років тому +2

      Declan Sheehan Why did they feel the need to ignore, Bond and Blofeld meeting in ''You Only Live Twice''?

    • @alucard624
      @alucard624 5 років тому +8

      @@fuzzydunlop7928 That's part of it, but this was a serious misstep after OHMSS in tone and storyline.

    • @booqueefious2230
      @booqueefious2230 3 роки тому +1

      @@ΜακηςΛ-ε5ρ the movies were adapted out of order, and the plot required Blofeld to think Bond was somebody else. It just wouldn't have worked if they recognized each other, they'd have to rewrite a huge part of the story, and they were really trying to stick with the book since it was written to be a movie

  • @SoftwareAgentsTV
    @SoftwareAgentsTV 8 років тому +89

    I swear up and down that this is basically an Austin Powers movie played entirely straight. -- AT

    • @josephvanburen1329
      @josephvanburen1329 7 років тому +3

      SoftwareAgentsCorp still makes it funnier than Austin powers.

    • @fuzzydunlop7928
      @fuzzydunlop7928 6 років тому

      But... isn't that literally the point?

    • @jonathancampbell5231
      @jonathancampbell5231 5 років тому +3

      Well, Austin Powers was literally based on this film specifically, so yes.
      (not sure about it being played ENTIRELY straight though)

    • @QUINT34577
      @QUINT34577 5 років тому +1

      fire the lazzzer...Dr Eevvil

    • @davehallett3128
      @davehallett3128 5 років тому

      @Just think what are you. A robot

  • @rippedreaper7279
    @rippedreaper7279 6 років тому +23

    I took me 10 years to get the part "providing the collars and cuffs match" phrase, Connery is a God

    • @JohnDoe-tm9wz
      @JohnDoe-tm9wz 4 роки тому +2

      Please, enlighten us sir

    • @anonvideo738
      @anonvideo738 3 роки тому +4

      @@JohnDoe-tm9wz its a "carpet matches the drapes" joke. (as in, hair on the head matches hair down below)

    • @JohnDoe-tm9wz
      @JohnDoe-tm9wz 3 роки тому

      @@anonvideo738 Thanks

  • @nicknewman7848
    @nicknewman7848 3 роки тому +5

    Sean also came back because the deal allowed him to make 2 other films of his choice where he would have creative control. One of these films was The Offence which he considered one of his better performances.

  • @mulvi747
    @mulvi747 5 років тому +7

    Mr. Wint and Mr. Kit are great henchmen. I love the strange presence they have.

    • @martyemmons3100
      @martyemmons3100 2 роки тому

      I agree. The homophobic psychological aspect of the assassins was/still is a viable formula in 'Movies for men' characteristic trait.
      There are a few movies that have used that theme.
      Norman Bates in "Psycho" (1960).
      The crossdressing killer/restroom scene in "Freebie And The Bean (1974).
      The Dr. Robert Elliott role in "Dressed To Kill" (1980).
      The Buffalo Bill role in "Silence Of The Lambs" (1991).

  • @dansgeld
    @dansgeld 8 років тому +19

    i also liked the fight in the lift

  • @イギリスの男
    @イギリスの男 5 років тому +9

    I like Diamonds. The blanks in the film are quite conspicuous, but it doesn’t look unorganized. The fun is that we don’t need to be concerned of the A to B to C, meaning we had time for the toilet break and still have the same fun. Moreover I feel the B part is deliberately missed in the plot, meaning there’s no deep reason for anything that happens in the whole film
    It’s lighthearted and opens the door for Moore’s direction, making the campy and comedic approach relatively consistent rather than tradition-breaking.
    Most of all, it clearly has an atmosphere of its own. The eerie score with the cheesy plot makes for a unique combination, instantly alluring you into the strange world of DAF.
    It doesn’t deserve the bashing it gets.

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 2 роки тому +1

      There's definitely a lot of good things about it. The first half of the movie is very good. And, as you say, there's a long portion following that is silly and doesn't advance the plot much. I think the main reason it's despised (besides bad Blofeld, no reference to Tracy) is that the climax fails to rescue it, as in Hamilton's other Bond films.

    • @martyemmons3100
      @martyemmons3100 2 роки тому

      The "Diamonds Are Forever" by Shirley Bassey and John Barry is my favorite Bond theme song.

  • @danielkinell3955
    @danielkinell3955 6 років тому +15

    I think it is a pretty good bond film

  • @1981ius
    @1981ius 2 роки тому +8

    Jill St. John, Charles Gray, Sean Connery and the others. Wonderful cast !

    • @martyemmons3100
      @martyemmons3100 2 роки тому +3

      I've had a 'crush' on Lana Wood ever since seeing her in "Diamonds Are Forever".

    • @1981ius
      @1981ius Рік тому +1

      @@martyemmons3100 I understand. She was a beautiful woman.

    • @Smudgeroon74
      @Smudgeroon74 Рік тому +1

      ​@@martyemmons3100 tell me about it 😊

  • @johnellizz
    @johnellizz 4 роки тому +4

    Not only did this one reveal the Apollo moon hoax as many have observed, but it also seems to reveal the Natalie Wood death hoax as well. The scene where Natalie's sister, Lana, is drowned as Robert Wagner's next wife, Jill St. John, looks on in horror seems infinitely beyond coincidence as was obviously a telegraphing of the hoax.

  • @LarsDVDTimeYT
    @LarsDVDTimeYT 3 роки тому +3

    10:13, for those who dont know, the car in the background is the Aston Martin DBS from on her majesty’s secret service being loaded with rockets. The car was going to be in the film but it didn’t make it to the final cut, so it gets a little cameo in Q Branch

  • @mattdurkee4651
    @mattdurkee4651 Рік тому +4

    This was one of the first bond movies I ever watched. Didn’t at the time think it was all that bad. Over the years I have come to realize how bad it really was. I still like it for the nostalgia

  • @Dremeli
    @Dremeli 3 місяці тому +1

    Those goons who Blofeld orders to take gun off Bond at the pre-title sequence are George Lane Cooper and Terence Mountain who appeared as a goon in pre-title sequence of OHMSS. George Lane Cooper also appeared as Blofeld's goon on OHMSS.

  • @DemonBoy3223
    @DemonBoy3223 8 років тому +10

    What you said in your _OHMSS_ review s correct: The producers *did* intend to end _Majesty's_ with Bond and Tracy driving off into the sunset following their wedding, saving Tracy's murder for the pre-credit scene in _Diamonds_, which *was* initially written to be more of a revenge-themed sequel. But of course, that was before Lazenby ultimately decided to quit the role.Here, it does feel like it's trying to be a both a stand-alone Connery-era film, while also trying to be a quasi-sequel to _Majesty's_.

    • @jamesatkinsonja
      @jamesatkinsonja Рік тому +1

      Allegedly the revenge script didn't work well so probably wouldn't have been used even if Lazenby stayed [at one point Blofeld wasn't even going to be in this film]. I think there was a push to end OHMSS like Fleming intended too.

  • @rogerhwerner6997
    @rogerhwerner6997 6 років тому +60

    Yea OK BUT Jill is so friggin hot!

    • @alucard624
      @alucard624 5 років тому +8

      Very true. Jill St. John was a straight up hottie in this film, but boy did she ever play complete utter morons in her career. Ironically she's pretty damn smart in real life and a really cool person to meet to boot.

    • @johnellizz
      @johnellizz 4 роки тому +2

      She's the hottest Bond girl and the two runners up are Barbara Bach and Jane Seymour.

    • @rogerhwerner6997
      @rogerhwerner6997 4 роки тому +4

      @@alucard624 I'd argue Diana Rigg, Cary Lowell, and Claudine Auger are at least as lovely.

    • @davidcoleman757
      @davidcoleman757 4 роки тому +1

      She sure was.

    • @michaelsinger4638
      @michaelsinger4638 4 роки тому +3

      @@rogerhwerner6997 Eva Green and Sophie Marceau.

  • @goodtitle686
    @goodtitle686 5 років тому +15

    5:25 To be fair, Irma Bunt was gonna be in Diamonds are Forever, but her actress died four days after premier of OHMSS. So naturally they hadty scrap the original plan of Bond tracking revenge on Tracy.
    It would have been awesome plot tho :D

    • @Hydrograd57
      @Hydrograd57 5 років тому +9

      With all the recasting the franchise had, I really don't think that would have been much of an issue, nor is it a valid excuse. They could have easily followed up on it with another actress playing Bunt.

    • @chrismc410
      @chrismc410 4 роки тому +3

      She was avenged eventually by For Your Eyes Only, some 15 years later. In many ways For Your Eyes Only was a follow-up to OHMSS

    • @Badanny777
      @Badanny777 4 роки тому +1

      Irma Bunt. Her name was Ilse Steppatt

    • @chrismc410
      @chrismc410 4 роки тому

      Head canon says Marc-Ange Draco, Tracy's father got to Bunt before Bond could

    • @michaelsinger4638
      @michaelsinger4638 4 роки тому +1

      Just recast the role then. They recast Blofeld like five times after all.

  • @imcustomized
    @imcustomized 5 років тому +12

    "So much tacky stuff in this movie." Dude, it was the 1970s, _The Decade That Good Taste Forgot!_ Maybe this is where it all started.

    • @DutchBondFan
      @DutchBondFan  5 років тому +8

      Perhaps. But look at The Spy Who Loved Me, which came out in the same decade. Thats tacky stuff done right and with style and class!

  • @sre94
    @sre94 5 років тому +14

    It really is striking how much Connery aged from You Only Live Twice to this movie. And to think, he was only 41 at the time
    I wonder what the reasoning was for the tense exchanges between 007 and M, something I don't recall seeing to that extent in any other Bond film. Was it meant to reflect a personal grudge between Connery and Broccoli/Saltzman?

    • @GrosvnerMcaffrey
      @GrosvnerMcaffrey 3 роки тому +2

      It could have been from stress. Connery couldn't even take a crap without being harassed by the media. People he didn't even know wrote letters to him either saying they wanted to kidnap him, screw him, or kill him. I can see why he was reluctant to return to Bond

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 2 роки тому +3

      It's weird because, in Outland, made 10 years later, he looks younger and more fit than he did in DAF. Hell, I think he looked better 20 years later in The Rock than he did in this one.

    • @joemoss5138
      @joemoss5138 2 роки тому

      @@varanid9 Wow...had the exact same thought. Wonder what happened between '68 and '71?

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 2 роки тому

      @@joemoss5138 Mega-success and too much good living, I imagine, LOL.

    • @DCDPM
      @DCDPM 2 роки тому

      I'm 38 and thought I looked fucked, then I read Connery's age in Diamonds.

  • @chrisroberts246
    @chrisroberts246 9 років тому +20

    I agree with many of your points.Charley Gray was terrable as blofeld.what were they thinking when they cast him.

    • @henrykujawa4427
      @henrykujawa4427 2 роки тому +1

      By total contrast... Charles Gray is FANTASTIC as the main villain "Mocata" in "THE DEVIL RIDES OUT" (1968), and as Mycroft Holmes in the Jeremy Brett SHERLOCK HOLMES series. (He also played Mycroft in the movie "THE SEVEN-PER-CENT SOLUTION".) And, to my utter shock, he played the hero in the Rocky Horror sequel, "SHOCK TREATMENT", where, at the end, he got to both SING and DANCE! What a guy.

  • @lukedaley17
    @lukedaley17 3 роки тому +4

    Diamonds are forever is a guilty pleasure for me. Very entertaining indeed.

  • @declansheehan1768
    @declansheehan1768 8 років тому +16

    I like this movie as a stand alone Bond film, I guess partly because of how balls to the wall insane I remember it being and just finding it a fun movie, but I found it disappointing as a follow up to On Her Majesty's Secret Service considering how that film ended on a really sombre note with Tracy dying and Bond being reduced to tears, and how in this film that's completely forgotten and the most we get following that is a line in The Spy Who Loved Me and Bond finally getting his revenge in For Your Eyes Only.

    • @1981lashlarue
      @1981lashlarue 7 років тому +2

      And a reference in Licence to Kill.

    • @lukasnummer1
      @lukasnummer1 6 років тому +3

      In "License to Kill", Bond is more upset about the death of his friend´s wife than he was about his own wife´s death.

    • @nashf5925
      @nashf5925 6 років тому +1

      yes, but the start of DAF puts Bond back on a revenge!

  • @bodieofci5418
    @bodieofci5418 5 років тому +6

    This is my guilty pleasure Bond film. It's not great and Connery looks about 90 but it has some good moments andca great John Barry score.

  • @JOSH-lw2jv
    @JOSH-lw2jv Рік тому +2

    Fun Fact:
    *"Diamonds Are Forever"* was the final film for actor Bruce Cabot (who played Bert Saxby). He's probably well known for his earlier film role as John "Jack" Driscoll, the First Mate of the Venture in the original *"KING KONG"* (1933).

  • @puppyash9656
    @puppyash9656 3 роки тому +3

    Fun fact: The pre-title sequence for "For your eyes only" brings the Bond v. Blofeld saga to an end, picking up both the fact that he was paralyzed following the oil-rig battle, and that he is the one responsible for the death of Bond's wife. It is actually a really clever setup.

    • @folkblueswriter
      @folkblueswriter 3 роки тому

      "Diamonds" was entertaining at the time but I found casting Jimmy Dean as Willard Whyte really bad, he was a country singer not a movie actor so he stuck out like a sore thumb trying to read his lines in a movie full of skilled actors like Sean Connery, Jill St. John, and Charles Gray.

  • @lloydsetty
    @lloydsetty 5 років тому +8

    And, don't forget about Plenty's see through clothes in the pool....

  • @venturatheace1
    @venturatheace1 4 роки тому +6

    Connery's best Bond film is 'The Rock'. Yes, I consider "John Mason" to be Bond

  • @kuribayashi84
    @kuribayashi84 4 роки тому +7

    John Barry had back pains from trying to carry this movie all by himself.
    Okay, I admit: Wint and Kidd were memorable henchmen, there were some funny lines, the FIght in the Elevator, the Las Vegas Car Chase and the Scene of Bond breaking into the Whyte-house top-floor were pretty good. But overall, this ranks at the bottom, right alongside "Die Another Day".

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 2 роки тому

      Interesting you mention DAD, as it had a lot of the same elements as this movie: a villain thought dead that comes back after altering his looks, diamond smuggling, a space-borne death ray, an escape with a goofy vehicle, I think I even read that the director was a fan of DAF.

  • @PowerRangers12345
    @PowerRangers12345 7 років тому +29

    "It's just a jump... to the left!"

    • @Charles-ik6ip
      @Charles-ik6ip 7 років тому +1

      Two Birds and a Third No !

    • @ecafssot
      @ecafssot 6 років тому +2

      😅I was going to go with Sweet Transvestite after seeing Blofeld in drag❗

    • @SwordHMX
      @SwordHMX 5 років тому +2

      And a step to the ri-i-i-i-ight!

    • @cianthulu4204
      @cianthulu4204 5 років тому +2

      Put your hands on your hips!

    • @HLHReviews
      @HLHReviews 4 роки тому +1

      The Man!! You bring your knees in tight

  • @rifham
    @rifham 8 років тому +17

    "Moonbuggy" sequence probably due to this being the period of US moon landings and lunar rovers.

    • @shantihealer
      @shantihealer 3 роки тому

      It's also a big reveal as incontrovertible evidence has now surfaced (2020) that footage of the NASA moon landings was faked up in a studio with Stanley Kubrick directing.

  • @sanchog5704
    @sanchog5704 8 років тому +6

    I haven't laughed so much in ages at some of your comments...you say a lot of small things that I have always thought weird after having watched this movie so many times out of nostalgia (as it was my first Bond). Thanks for this brilliant review!!

    • @DutchBondFan
      @DutchBondFan  8 років тому +1

      +Hanglemez Pallaccini Haha so good to hear man! Comments like these motivate me to work on these projects, its fun spending all those hours producing knowing that there are fellow fans out there awaiting these episodes! :)

  • @thejawooshtroll5565
    @thejawooshtroll5565 9 років тому +9

    Loving these. Watched all of them back to back. Keep up the good work

    • @DutchBondFan
      @DutchBondFan  9 років тому +2

      +TheJawooshTroll Man that's so awesome, thanks :) - Glad you enjoyed! - I will start producing episode 8 soon! :)

  • @kirk1701
    @kirk1701 5 років тому +3

    I used to tolerate this film because of the early 70s vibe, but it's gotten lower on my list.
    I still love the them song and John Barry's soundtrack.

  • @edwardgreen6577
    @edwardgreen6577 7 років тому +20

    my least favourite connery film but it does have a cracking theme song . good and fair review of a less than steller film thumbs up sir.

    • @davehallett3128
      @davehallett3128 5 років тому +1

      @Just think what are you. A robot

    • @AvengerII
      @AvengerII 5 років тому

      You honestly think THIS is worse than Never Say Never Again?
      Neither film is fantastic -- they rank among the Top 5 WORST Bond films -- but I'd say Diamonds is NARROWLY more tolerable than Never Say Never Again.
      Again, they're both terrible Bond movies.

  • @NDHFilms
    @NDHFilms 4 роки тому +4

    4:07 I saw Diamonds Are Forever before You Only Live Twice, so this part was very confusing at first.

  • @sonofportsmith4435
    @sonofportsmith4435 5 років тому +5

    Thank you so much for this review. I needed reminding why it is that I have not revisited this film since the first (and only) time I watched it. Sean will always be Bond to me, it's just a shame he left the worst till last. Should have been Lazenby.

    • @ΜακηςΛ-ε5ρ
      @ΜακηςΛ-ε5ρ 4 роки тому +1

      Connery is Bond until the early 70s. Producers wanted him in ''Live and Let Die''. If ''Diamonds Are Forever'' was a revenge film and not a a follow-up of ''You Only Live Twice'', he would fit perfectly as Bond after Tracy's death.

    • @jamesatkinsonja
      @jamesatkinsonja Рік тому

      I do believe if Lazenby had signed that contract he would have been paid to leave as UA wanted Connery back, money no object [John Gavin was signed as Bond but paid off once Connery returned]

  • @jeremy28135
    @jeremy28135 5 років тому +5

    Man you're so good at this. Awesome job again 👍

  • @cheezemonkeyeater
    @cheezemonkeyeater 6 років тому +2

    Diamonds can actually be used in lasers, but you focus the light through them to make the beam narrow enough to burn. You don't just put a blinged up dish around the laser.

  • @pwareham61
    @pwareham61 5 років тому +4

    Your commentary is hilarious, had me in stitches. Bravo

  • @GermanLeftist
    @GermanLeftist 8 років тому +7

    My ranking for the series up until this point:
    1. Goldfinger
    2. From Russia with Love
    3. Dr. No
    4. Thunderball
    5. On Her Majesty's Secret Service
    6. Diamonds Are Forever
    7. You Only Live Twice

  • @theskyliner9963
    @theskyliner9963 9 років тому +19

    I really look forward to watch the next video with Roger Moore;).I am happy that I have found you on UA-cam:)You do a good job!!!;)

    • @DutchBondFan
      @DutchBondFan  9 років тому +3

      +TheSkyliner 99 Thanks a lot my friend, welcome aboard! And I will make sure to release the next episode soon! :)

    • @mariakelly5
      @mariakelly5 6 років тому

      TheSkyliner 99 Yes, DutchBondFan is the best Bond reviewers on UA-cam.

  • @bladerunner951
    @bladerunner951 9 років тому +34

    I definitely agree with this review. I would even go so far as saying that the climax at the oil rig is the worst one in the series because Bond does NONE of the dirty work here. In Dr. No he at least had a decent, even if very short, fight with the villain. Here all he does is call the cavalry and dick around with a crane and the day is saved. All good action movies have to give the heroes a run for their money but this just seems like picnic to Bond.
    Doesn't help that Charles Gray is as intimidating as a kitten either. He is actually a very good comedic actor but dear God this is Blofeld he is supposed to be! The man who murdered Mrs. Bond, the mysterious figure who made even Rosa Klebb shudder in fear! Even the goofiest Roger Moore films have more believable bad guys.

    • @postersandstuff
      @postersandstuff 7 років тому +2

      Don't blame Gray , he could be intimidating if the script was there.

    • @Luke-cp2jz
      @Luke-cp2jz 3 роки тому

      Didn’t Bond practically save Washington from being destroyed through his crane hijinx though? He used the crane to destroy the building which the cassette was using to guide the satellite laser to destroy Washington. For arguments sake though, he definitely could’ve gone and destroyed the tape faster if he did it on his own without using the crane for like three minutes and messing around but it did add a little comedy albeit being very impractical.

  • @tomemeigh5338
    @tomemeigh5338 5 років тому +7

    The moon scene was a reference to the brand new "conspiracy theory" of the time - that the Apollo moon landings were in fact staged.

  • @Krzyszczynski
    @Krzyszczynski 7 років тому +3

    Never understood, either at the time or since, why Bambi and Thumper joined Bond in the pool when they were very clearly more than a match for him on dry land.

  • @brycewilson5886
    @brycewilson5886 3 роки тому +2

    You hit this review out of the park, every issue with the film you've identified, (except perhaps Connery's Pink tie.) Having said that, I actually enjoy this movie.

  • @chrisnorman9980
    @chrisnorman9980 6 років тому +18

    I couldn’t believe how badly they dressed Connery in this movie.
    That lavender tie that only came down to the top of his stomach was appalling.

    • @AcidRayne100
      @AcidRayne100 2 роки тому +1

      Right!? It made him look like an immature school boy trying to be rebellious rather than a suave top secret agent

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 2 роки тому

      That's because they were using his wardrobe from YOLT and, by 1971, Connery had grown 9 inches.

  • @patd4u2
    @patd4u2 7 років тому +1

    The last scene of the oil derrick being attacked was shot just off the coast in my home town of Oceanside Calif. It was in our local paper about it. I was fifteen years old at the time. My friends and I rode our stingray bikes to the Oceanside pier to watch it as good as we could. Couldn't see to much but we did see the explosions.

  • @TheHCPMusic
    @TheHCPMusic 8 років тому +22

    The "moon sequence" is more than likely a sly nod to the conspiracy theory buffs who claimed (even as far back as the early 70's) that the landings were faked on a sound stage.
    If you think the Vegas scenes were tacky, you haven't even mentioned the deleted scene where The Honorable Sammy Davis, Jr., makes a cameo appearance, and actually DISSES Bond's white dinner jacket ("What wedding cake did HE fall off of!")! Not cool to have the hero referred to as not being cool. (But I remember Roger Moore's Sansa-Belt slacks in "For Your Eyes Only", and you can make all the "Dad-slacks" jokes you want to about that.)
    Charles Gray's portrayal as Blofeld has got to be the GAYest, most campiest version, even moreso than Dr. Evil. I guess he was getting his practice in for the role of Dr. Scott in "Rocky Horror"....

    • @fuzzydunlop7928
      @fuzzydunlop7928 6 років тому +2

      I've always wondered where that conspiracy got started, wouldn't be surprised if it were Soviet in origin or something.

    • @stephencalder8357
      @stephencalder8357 5 років тому +1

      The fake moon landing nonsense did not enter the public discourse (lamentably) until years later. No way were they foreshadowing that. The artificial moonscape would have been constructed and used to test space suits, moon buggies, and various astronaut paraphernalia. Very common activity for an engineering / tech company. Also, note that the moon landings were very recent history at the time, and loomed large in the public consciousness. No surprise at all that EON would want to capture some of that in their film.

    • @les4767
      @les4767 5 років тому +1

      Charles Gray wasn't Dr. Scott. He was the criminologist.

    • @johnellizz
      @johnellizz 4 роки тому +1

      Not only did this one reveal the Apollo moon hoax but it also seems to reveal the Natalie Wood death hoax as well. The scene where Natalie's sister, Lana, is drowned as Robert Wagner's next wife, Jill St. John, looks on in horror seems infinitely beyond coincidence and was obviously a telegraphing of the hoax.

    • @martyemmons3100
      @martyemmons3100 2 роки тому

      That can't be as absurd as having Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor.

  • @janekwiocha
    @janekwiocha 9 років тому +4

    (Not so) Fun Fact: Plenty is played by Lana Wood - sister of Natalie Wood who you may know as Judy from Rebel Without a Cause. Natalie drowned in 1981 which makes Plenty's death in DAF is kinda unfortunate

  • @hasan_z
    @hasan_z 5 років тому +9

    15:40 a young boris from goldeneye!

  • @mws755
    @mws755 2 роки тому +3

    After James Bond has already saved the world from destruction 3 or 4 times, his name might become well known

  • @DannyAbs
    @DannyAbs 9 років тому +86

    Connery looked like he aged 25 years gained 60 pounds and had only about 2% of the enthusiasm since Dr. No , which was only nine years before this biblical Trainwreck

  • @getmario64
    @getmario64 8 років тому +10

    "Diamonds Are Forever" may not be the best Bond film ever, but I actually enjoy it. It's James Bond goes to Las Vegas, and it turns out to be a cool road trip. I would say that I did agree with the reviewer because Bond was supposed to take vengeance against Blofeld from the last one which doesn't add up. I would like to see Bond goes on a turmoil of how he lost his first wife. You can at least make him a sad scene where the last one indicate that Bond was so emotional that his wife was killed because this one was very tragic. But instead, they threw Connery to take care of this situation with the opening scene where he wants to kill Blofeld, goes on a mission to find the real diamonds, and then again meets Blofeld with the exact same plot that we already know from the last two movies. Does it make it weak? Probably yay, but it didn't make through from the series. However, I actually enjoy this movie, despite the force revenge scene and the hairy Blofeld who still wants to take over the world. Bond hangs out in Las Vegas was pretty cool, Connery does deliver as James Bond, and not only that is 😍 ooh these 70's gals were so hot. I rather see Plenty O' Toole's boobs any day, Bambi and Thumber were erotic acrobatic women with a funny fight scene, and Tiffany Case was far the best Bond girl ever. The actions were good, and the ending climax should've made it stronger, but it's a fun action scene. I would rank this one was a good Bond film in the middle, but I would defiantly enjoy it. After Connery left out from the franchise, now things have change for the seventies and who will be the next Bond character...Roger Moore.

    • @martyemmons3100
      @martyemmons3100 2 роки тому

      I wish that there were more roles for Lana Wood.

  • @Texy88
    @Texy88 5 років тому +1

    With regards to the car swapping wheels in Las Vegas, on the DVD version was an extra which showed a version of the car exiting on the same wheels as it was originally on (i.e. its right ones). If I remember correctly, the problem the film-makers had with this rejected version was that the people on the pavement were just standing around outside the Pioneer and the Carousel in a clump watching, and there was a police car among them. Because of this the shot was deemed unusable.

  • @misternewoutlook5437
    @misternewoutlook5437 9 років тому +1

    Completely agree. At the time people were glad Connery was back. But the movie was so uncool compared to the 1960s projects, that we were saying maybe Lazenby wasn't so bad after all - which he wasn't. Were it not for Live and Let Die, that would have been the end of it. Live and Let Die wasn't the greatest either because it was another adjustment for audiences, but at least the franchise had something fresh. Diamonds is to Sean Connery as Moonraker is to Roger Moore. But don't get me started on the 1980s James Bond. The 1980s had a lot of cool stuff, but Bond didn't come along for the ride unfortunately.

  • @crimsondeath7468
    @crimsondeath7468 9 років тому +5

    I love your reviews. Keep em coming

    • @DutchBondFan
      @DutchBondFan  9 років тому +1

      +heavytom89 I will! Glad you enjoy them :)

  • @jenniferschillig3768
    @jenniferschillig3768 8 років тому +8

    In all fairness...Tiffany IS part of the criminal element, and it's possible Bond's name has gotten around the criminal underworld.

    • @DutchBondFan
      @DutchBondFan  8 років тому +6

      Fair point!

    • @martyemmons3100
      @martyemmons3100 2 роки тому +1

      I don't feel a need to 'justify/explain' all the reasons on why "Diamonds Are Forever" is a horrible movie.
      I personally liked the comedy of the "You just killed James Bond" scene.

  • @simonbrunner3062
    @simonbrunner3062 5 років тому +2

    Great review, I fully agree with everything you said. This used to be my least favourite Bond movie until Spectre came out. I can't believe Sean Connery is actually younger than Roger Moore. It took Moore 14 years and seven more Bond movies to look as old as Connery does in this one.
    Another issue I have with the climax is that in the end the day is saved by forcefully destroying the control center. That renders everything pointless that happened on the oil rig up until that point. What was all that fuzz with the tape about and why did Bond even go in on his own before calling the cavalry, when they could have simply launched a missile into the control center from the helicopter to begin with?

    • @str.77
      @str.77 5 років тому

      ""It took Moore 14 years and seven more Bond movies to look as old as Connery does in this one."
      That's not actually true. Connery looks much older than he did in You Only Live Twice but he looked still much younger compared to the later Roger Moore. I would guess Diamond's Connery and the early Roger Moore to be of pretty much the same age.However, in the early movies Moore made up for his age with wit and charme, which Connery was lacking in this one.

  • @henrykujawa4427
    @henrykujawa4427 2 роки тому +1

    There's only 2 things I like in this film. One is Jill St. John (but only in her Amsterdam scenes, the ONE brief part of the movie that actually stuck to the novel, which I did like very much). The other is Shirley Bassey's theme song. Of the 3 she did, "DIAMONDS" is by far my favorite.
    My Dad and I once watched this UNCUT without commercial breaks... and about halfway thru, when we took a break to get food, he said he could NOT follow the plot at all!! That just shows how bad it was. And that's completely beside the style and tone of the thing.

  • @mr.tramber
    @mr.tramber 4 роки тому +3

    Very good review. Diamonds are forever was the first Connery's Bond , which I saw at the age of 15. So I have some nostalgia feelings for this one. But many years has passed, and now I can see and understand all the mistakes in this one. I agree, the biggest mistake was taking away the story of Bond's revenge for Tracy. Even without Lazenby, producers could develop this story with Connery, and they should brought Pleasance of Savallas back for the role of Blofeld. I agree, Charles Gray really sucks as Blofeld. Even as a standalone Bond story, DAF has too much unfunny moments, which you have mentioned. Some scenes are especially dissapoiting, such as pre-title sequence and final battle in the oil rig, there wasn't any extreme and brutal moments, which have already shown in the previous movies. But at the same time movie has some good scenes, for me Fight at the elevator, Cop chase are good-done and looks extreme, even Moonwalk chase and final confronation with Wint and Kidd looks funny for me. Same thing is with characters, as for me, Mr.Wind and Mr.Kid were really memorable henchmen, and Jill St John is really beatifull for Bond girl. As for Sean Connery himself, yes, he looks older, he looks in his mid 40-s in DAF. And I think this comic style doens't suit for his type of character, it just feets Moore better. Also the whole soundtrack of this flick is awesome, both theme song and others movie themes are very well done by maestro John Barry. Totally, this movie is very weak for me, but I like to watch is sometimes for pure nostalgy. Actually, the predcessor and successor of this movie - OHMSS and LALD are miles better than this one. OHMSS for me is very unusual and unique Bond film (Lazenby was very good). And LALD is very cool and creative Bond movie, the whole humor style fits perfect to Moore's debut entry. And LALD is one of my favourite Moore's Bond movie, along with TSWLM and OP, very good one. Thank you for the review, greetings from Ukraine.

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 2 роки тому

      Spot on assessment.

  • @kevind814
    @kevind814 8 років тому +24

    Liked how many times you said "just getting started", cause the campiness just kept on coming.

  • @IanWaterfall
    @IanWaterfall 7 років тому +4

    Great take on this movie. It's certainly higher up my list than yours, but I'm in total agreement with you over Dalton's movies, especially Licence To Kill (which was my first cinematic bond experience), Kinda gotta like Tim's movies as he lived in my home town for many years!

    • @DutchBondFan
      @DutchBondFan  7 років тому +1

      No way! Which hometown was that? Man that's awesome! (And thanks, my take on this is as good as yours! It's all so subjective!)

    • @IanWaterfall
      @IanWaterfall 7 років тому +2

      DutchBondFan It's a small town in England called Belper. His family used to own an oil refinery there.
      Great work on the recapping series, looking forward to the last few episodes.

  • @rsavage569
    @rsavage569 7 років тому +1

    You forgot about Shady Tree having 2 different basement dressing rooms. Plus, there were 2 different vehicle rentals. One was the red Mustang, but the other was hard to tell, since it's a dull yellow color in the movie for 20 seconds. Where Felix steps out his car and tells James he lost her.

  • @varanid9
    @varanid9 2 роки тому +3

    BTW, that goop for the Blofeld duplicate was sulfur mud from the hot spring for him to soak in at a specific temperature in order to prepare the skin for plastic surgery. It's a reference to a scene from the novel (which had nothing to do with Blofeld or space-borne lasers but was about an American mob and climaxes in a ghost town) in which Bond goes to a mud bath spa.

  • @vik_body_beld7294
    @vik_body_beld7294 6 років тому +2

    If this were to be remade in today's era, storyline would have been like di caprio movie blood diamond, realistic and gritty.
    One thing that has changed over the years is the ambition of these villains, it has become realistic and achievable or believable.

    • @DutchBondFan
      @DutchBondFan  6 років тому

      Added that to my watch list! Don't think I ever saw it! And I love Di Caprio!

  • @shamsingh6280
    @shamsingh6280 3 роки тому +2

    absolutely amazing review and spot on, really loved it and you re very funny. Thank you for bringing joy. yes this film is the weakest of the Connery films sadly, but I love it due to the fact that it was the first bond film i watched on British TV way back in the early 1980's.

  • @drivingschool803
    @drivingschool803 3 роки тому +1

    Fun fact, mr wint is played by bruce Glover who is the father of crispin Glover. Crispin glover played george mcfly in back to the future.

  • @Asidders
    @Asidders 8 років тому

    3:35 Thank you for clearing that up. Something about that voice delivery *always* seemed off to me, and I had no reason why.

  • @larrysepicmovies5044
    @larrysepicmovies5044 Рік тому +1

    Peter Franks is played by KOE ROBINSON, hero of the Hercules movies from the 1960s.

  • @tudortentiu
    @tudortentiu 5 років тому +8

    Blofeld 1963 vs Blofeld 1971 it's like tiger vs cat

  • @gavintheg.o.a.t2001
    @gavintheg.o.a.t2001 Рік тому +1

    What if (This is my theory) there’s like a different reincarnation of Bond? One is married but his wife died (Plus references), the other facing SPECTRE, another one going on different adventures, & the other is Daniel Craig

  • @jroch41
    @jroch41 5 років тому +1

    Best Bond movie review I've seen yet, Dank U wel.

  • @bradhoward2410
    @bradhoward2410 4 роки тому +2

    Any Bond movie taking place in Las Vegas in the 1970s is bound to be tacky. So it’s a mediocre film, but it was fun to see Sean Connery back, and the movie’s title song will always be one of the best in the franchise. Gotta love Dame Shirley Veronica Bassey!

  • @Anthony_Stockton09
    @Anthony_Stockton09 3 роки тому +2

    Diamonds is my favourite Sean Connery bond film

  • @haileyshannon7548
    @haileyshannon7548 8 років тому +3

    Circus Circus is a real casino in Las Vegas, it's circus-themed, there's an amusement park and acrobats and stuff like that in it
    Hunter S. Thompson probably gave the description of it in "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas"
    "The Circus-Circus is what the whole hep world would be doing Saturday night if the Nazis had won the war. This is the sixth Reich. The ground floor is full of gambling tables, like all the other casinos . . . but the place is about four stories high, in the style of a circus tent, and all manner of strange County-Fair/Polish Carnival madness is going on up in this space."

  • @CARLWISE2008
    @CARLWISE2008 4 роки тому +2

    I love all Sean Connery Bond Movies .His personality as Bond is off the scales

  • @SwordHMX
    @SwordHMX 5 років тому +3

    22:08- Yes, I most certainly do!

  • @henrykujawa4427
    @henrykujawa4427 2 роки тому +1

    Here's a weird bit of trivia for you: David De Kyser, who had a brief role as a doctor in "DIAMONDS", is the one who DUBBED Gabrielle Ferzetti's voice in "OHMSS". It's one of the few times they got someone other than Robert Rietti to dub someone on a Bond film.

  • @nergalshagrath6667
    @nergalshagrath6667 4 роки тому +2

    Similar idea with the satellite on die another daywith more realistic destructions with the laser

  • @poontang3zizo
    @poontang3zizo 6 років тому +1

    "First of all, WHAT? And second of all, THE FUCK?!" You couldn't have said it any better

  • @kijekuyo9494
    @kijekuyo9494 4 роки тому +1

    Marc "I didn't know there was a pool down there" Lawrence plays one of my favorite Bond villains. He appears in the next film, The Man with the Golden Gun, as the gangster killed in the funhouse ("Rodney"). I wish they had kept the actor and character as an ongoing assassin that appears in and survives every film.

  • @jamminjohn
    @jamminjohn 2 роки тому +1

    Unlike most with a newfound love for the Lazenby film, I'll take Diamonds any day.