If you’re hungry for more Huawei, Business Casual does a great job diving deeper into Huawei’s History: ua-cam.com/video/zIjVbcS02YM/v-deo.html Also, If you noticed I uncharacteristically left out Apple, that’s no mistake: more to come!
The only misunderstanding about china is how bad their gov't is for most everyone inside and outside china. Most people, even after corona, are hardly aware of all the meddling that country is doing.
It's pretty much two of the largest economies playing diplomacy on each other for their monopoly on security/surveillance/power/everything within their country with the passive goal of removing the competition
Only difference China will not be able to cheat as much now...ie if Trump for once holds on to his guns and there is bipartisanship in the Congress in future with regards to dealing with China..
@@themiddlekingdom9121 You are comparing what Europeans did in the middle ages to what Chinese Commie party is stealing now!!!...Two wrongs don't make a right..
@@ameyas7726 It doesn't get anything to do with two wrongs make a right, I just stated exactly what happened. Talking about the IP thief, it happened everywhere since human being existed on this planet earth, almost the EU countries are using Latin alphabets, that meant the other countries' people within EU stole the alphabets from the Italian people invented. And the Italian stole the idea from the Greek, the Greek stole the alphabets idea from the ancient Phoenicians invented alphabets and the list go on and on. ua-cam.com/video/i0rFoaxTDt4/v-deo.html
I find this whole conflict hilarious since China grew so big thanks to the soviets giving them tons of machinery, training, investments, and materials. Then in the 70s when the Soviets piggy banks were running dry the chinese opened up to the west and got various governments, NGOs, and the World Bank/IBRD to give them tons of money to develop (which they still get today sadly) and to further boost their economy they whore themselves out to any foreign investors they can find. The PRC is almost entirely built of foreign investors but they love to pretend it's thanks to the CCP. This is also without mentioning all the stealing the CCP does with stealing tech and underworld activities like forgeries, hacking, dealing drugs, etc. The US is pretty stupid too in that despite the evil the CCP does, the threat they pose, and all the thieving they do the US has done almost NOTHING to get china to act better
Anything neutral to positive is state sponsored to brainwashed mutts. This video is neutral and state sponsored. Keep consuming your democracy propaganda. Democracy sponsoring coups, bombing the middle East, and bring the biggest threat to world peace.
in this one his voice changed a bit from the former (probably a separate recording) and that light background music gave it away His iPhone cost one was seriously seamless though
7:34 idk, wouldn’t the French have most incentive to lie about that sort of thing? They used to have an absolute strangle grip on Africa and are losing it to China.
PolyMatter: Economic Infographic Show: Serial Killers HAI: Random interesting things Wendover: Planes Atlas Pro: Geography Casual Navigation: Ships RLL: Disasters and extinction Extra Credit: Populary history Business Casual: Well, Business Lemmino: Best documentaries! Mustard: Transportations
Obviously they shouldn't be persecuting Huawei for standard practices in the industry. Anything that can update the firmware has a backdoor.. like your router.
you know facebook leaks all personal information to cambridge analytics... Why American companies always deceive their own people? It is not reasonable.
If you cannot find any backdoors one one device, such as Huawei and say there is a backdoor, also you cannot deny there may be backdoors on other US Govenment-convinced devices.
This is a totally legal and totally cool document which describes, announces and otherwise rambles about corporate stuff like for example the name of the company and what it is called and where its located but i could honestly just write anything here because who is going to pause the video and read this? and of that small subsection of people, how many will get this far are you into reading this? seriously, why are you reading this? this is a boring document and im just trying to emulate how boring it is with small text poor grammar no periods mistakes etc. and yet you continue to read it why what are you doing like go plant a tree or something like just think of all the things in the universe that you could be doing seriously someone is making rockets right now and you keep reading this what are you doing please reconsider go make a rocket or at least plant a tree you know what, you do you! ok bye good luck.
I agree with the restrictions imposed to those multinationals. FB, Google, Twitter, online games, among others are only interested in their benefits, so they are addictive and nocive to the users. Also, in that way, they incentivated the development of national solutions that now serves in this commercial war. Imagine if they depended on google, and with this sanctions all of them were incomunicated. And, of course, ALWAYS US has spied to every country, invaded, sanctioned, imposed, and much more even to allied countries.
@@GavriJ We sure can use your devices like Iphones. The ban is mostly on online websites. And obviously although you guys are not banned to use Chinese social media, you probably won't use it. So it seems fair to me.
@@GavriJ Software/website/social media, whatever you call them. We use a lot of your softwares, adobe tools, steam/epic and the games, chrome, bing, you name it. So far I believe the only popular Chinese software in the west is TikTok, which just experienced a ban. So who's fishy?
Did you mention the 10 backdoors in Cisco equipment(6 of which were new and didn't exist before) and the two well constructed backdoors in Juniper equipment which was traced back to the NSA?
My question: One of the two countries spies to protect their country and the whole world, while the other country spies to steal technologies and to rule the world. What country do you take side?
@@SA2004YG the chinese government is extremely oppressive and intrusive on its citizens rights, much more than the USA is. Their president just decided he wasnt going to leave for fuck sake. That should tell you everything you need to know about bullshit china.
6:55 "But Huawei is no ordinary company; it has a long history of alleged misbehavior. It’s CFO was, quite prominently, arrested in Canada on the grounds of violating US sanctions on Iran." Damm, not respecting unilateral sanctions the US imposed on another country of the world is bad behavior... ? Ok lol, it didn't know the US is the supreme judge of the world 7:32 "Then, last year, a French newspaper..." - Show the Financial Times - Meh, as a French I don't know I should feel upset or honored lol
a m Anonymous sources are prevalent throughout journalism, accurate or inaccurate. Do you think people who leak classified files for the most part want to be recognised? You have to judge the newspaper and its history, not the fact that it uses anonymous sources
@@bachhoang8794 This isn't classified though. This is just some people who don't at all need to remain anonymous. Most journalism the US fakes includes anonymous sources.
@@darrishawks6033 What exactly do you think china would do to someone who exposes something like this? specially when they live in a third world country which makes disappearing someone all the easier.
Meh it was both good and bad about Huawei. To me it actually seemed a bit more on the USA side than Huawei all together; especially with the conclusion part. Like if we can't trust any country other than our own to manifacture equipment of infrastructure then how will this world work? That'd be super expensive. Every western country would have to develop and manifacture infrastructure independantly. It's insane. If foreign is argument of safety (rather than quality deep dive control over product) it's ridiculous one. It means UK can't have USA technology coz it's foreign and so on.
Riky is spot on. proof Huawei copies technology is that it copied the shadow government funded by DARPA's 3-letter agencies and operating in silicon valley. China copies everything, including the US replacement for Operation Mockingbird.
@@Isometrix116 You are full of pride and prejudice. I live in China, I know the facts, and you do n’t know, you may not have been to China. You think I am a slave to the Communist Party, but I think you are a slave to the capitalist.
@@Isometrix116 No, there isn't an exception for "good and loyal citizens". He's probably using a VPN. The great fire wall requires a VPN to bypass and the CCP must allow VPNs to exist in order to allow businesses to operate. This means that the public can also access the internet, mostly to dogpile anyone that disrespects China... the country that has cordoned them off from the rest of the world.
I freaking love your videos! Every upload is just perfect! But there's something I like even more: Your sponsorship transitions. They hit you completely out of the blue because you think its all part of the video and just fits so perfectly! Keep it up👍👍
I like how this guy, even while he has formed his opinion, presents all aspects of a debate and is only coming to logical conclusions. Great work bud !
Yeah, but the US doesn't do this: China kidnaps and tortures Canadian diplomats, has a Nazi "living space" genocide in Tibet, puts a MILLION Uyghars in Concentration Camps, their children in other Concentration Camps, that's the Dem's argument for bombing China back to the Stone Age, just like Germany '45. Kim has US boomer subs on China's doorstep, Dictator-Fanboy Trump's own polling says he's done, and the Dems idealize Canada, HATE Putin, and have GOP backing to STOMP China. Xi and Putin are SCREWED. China might have gotten away with just the Nazi-inspired genocide in Tibet, but harvesting organs from innocent citizens, plus the Uyghar horror, and now extorting a Western country like Canada, who can politically bridge the EU, UK, and Aussies with the US against China: glaring mistakes. Seperating families is a hot-button issue for the Dems, they are spending MILLIONS on it next year whipping up a frenzy to crush Trump, and China just admitted they did it on a vast, Nazi scale. OOPS! I majored in History: Germany in '45 will be China's new look if Xi doesn't stop his Hitler-'35 act, and if China thinks Realpolitic justifies Xi's current arrogance and brutality, bombed back to the Stone Age is the real Realpolitic, just ask Germany. Don't get me started on what a Dem President is willing to do to Putin. Just sayin...;) [reposted]
@@piedpiper1172 Yea it's a shopping platform but what does it have to do with Huawei's blue book? Edit: Ok it's not entirely a shopping platform, but still I don't get it. Edit 2: Ok now I see it, it's Mao's little red book.
The way you segue from content into sponsor promotion is MASTERFUL. Well done, sir. I always listen to the ad just out of respect for such a seamless transition.
I think this is the most objective view on this issue (Huawei, trade war etc) I have ever seen on UA-cam. Thank you for the vivid presentation. - Greetings from a Chinese viewer.
@@jackni2435 the whole thing. "To the gulog" is a known joke as an exaggerated punishment. See, in the civilized world, no one gets sent to the gulog. So that's the joke.
Two rather important more points. 1: Huawei staff has been found guilty of spying in Poland. Directly connected to their hardware. 2: The Chinese government has a rich history of just taking over private companies, blaming some crime on the owners. It does not matter that much who ownes Huawei now, it matters, that there is the risk of losing support for the hardwareinfrastructure if the Chinese gov wants to.
@SourPls no. Google, Microsoft, hp, dell forcing trump administration to lift trade sanctions. But trump don't care them. Actually trump theartened google by filing anti trust suit against them
Huawei former staff spying in Poland was an individual action according to a spokesman for the Polish security service and it has nothing to do with hardware. Get your fact straight. www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jan/11/huawei-employee-arrested-in-poland-over-chinese-spy-allegations
The ban isn't retroactive. and the software ban only says they can't collaborate with Google, Huawei will still have access to the open-source versions of Android that Google publishes for everyone. The news article I read said they can't collaborate to get Google services integrated into the phones, but they can't have that in China anyway.
@@kiddostyleyt yes, same lol, the ban is not fully in affect Huawei have a temporary license that allows them to give any Huawei device that was released before the ban updates on software (this license is soon to expire with no current news as to whether another extension will be granted) so for the time being enjoy also the apps will continue working since they already have GMS etc... just no updates so even when the license expires you and I will still watch UA-cam, use google maps etc... and more and more apps are using Harmony OS and can be found on Huawei app gallery (there is a Wishlist that you can now use to request apps that you want on their app gallery that is not currently available.
In your example at the end, wouldn't neither ever say no? If you asked a knight they would say yes they are because they always tell the truth If you asked a knave, they would say yes, because they always lie Either way they should never say no.
Yeah you're supposed to ask them what the other guy would say if you'd ask them. If you're asking the knight, the knave would've lied and said yes so the knight says yes. If you ask the knave however, the knight would've said yes so you get no. Either way you know who's who
Wow, just first time to recognize that the employee union is that powerful...Actually, in my view, the union is totally nothing but a loose organization. Huawei is controlled by its executive board.
Here's a fun fact about Huawei: They've never published a CVE, ever. A CVE is a Common Vulnerability and Exposure. It's basically a system that attempts to standardize the publishing and documentation of a vulnerability in a particular piece of hardware, software, or both. It's run by non-profit research organization funded by US Homeland Security. Basically everyone has published CVEs, Apple, Google, telco companies, etc, except for Huawei. The first time Huawei published a CVE for anything, was a direct response to a Defcon talk in which it was pointed out that they'd never published a CVE. Absolutely classic stuff. You can watch a deep dive into their security here: ua-cam.com/video/w-K1YpJp07s/v-deo.html Their security is hilarious because their codebase is shit. I don't believe they really steal code en masse, but what they *did* do, in the case of Cisco IOS, was copied how it works. They copied one of the routing methods (EIGRP, basically it's how routers talk to eachother), and they copied the documentation, but this was mainly done for convenience sake - so if you know how to use IOS, like I've studies, then you or I will automatically know how to use Huawei as well, because it's functionally the same. The code is different, though, and it's pretty bad. That video is well worth a watch if this stuff interests you at all.
'If I asked if you were a knight, what would you say' 'No'. A knight would say yes. So he's a knave. He lies because he would actually say yes, but since he is a liar, he lies about that too and says no.
the knave *will always lie*, the knave's answer will have to be 'yes'. by your 'logic' if u ask a liar if he is a liar he would say yes. so the right answer is 'they' are neither knights nor knaves
Huawei is a private company. A company hold by union is different than state. If a company share almost all its profit with employees. it doesn't make scene for others to hold its 'union' stock. Same thing happened on Japan's companies 30 years ago, so it is not a system problem also.
The problem with Huawei situation is, the common people has no way of understanding how difficult it is to covertly steal data using 5G equipment. Can you put a backdoor into your router/os/software? The answer is definitely yes. Can you keep it a secret? If you are planning to use the said backdoor, the answer is definitely no. It doesn't matter how good your programmers are. The rest of the world's programmers will always be better. And when a piece of equipment is as distrusted as Huawei's stuff tend to be, you can be sure the top reverse engineers accross the world will race against each other to find the slightest indication of a back door. In my personal opinion, Huawei is definitely controlled by the Chinese government. But that doesn't mean they can put backdoors into those equipments willy nilly. Beucase if someone catches a backdoor in a Cisco router, they can say "we were using it for testing and accidentally left it in the production mode" and the world will believe them. If the same happens with a Huawei equioment, it will be the end of them. So they simply can't risk it. Yet. Down the line, in 10 years, if they manage to get their equipment every corner of the word, they might get more brazen (like the google is) but currently, i don't think they'd risk putting any kind of nefarious code.
well, China never ban any international telecom companies from doing business in China. That is part of the reason, why Huawei is one of the most successful Chinese company in the global market. Because, the domestic market was taken by international telecom companies by that time. So the claim that China is protecting by banning FB, Twitter, google to protect Huawei does not make sense. Not only because these companies are not direct competitors of Huawei, also it is impossible for a company to become successful merely since the protection from the government.
China has a dubious history with corporate espionage that is very likely to have benefited its tech companies. I am not suggesting that Western companies do not or have not behaved similarly in the past, nor that there are no US companies with close affiliation to the state, but China's strategic advantage in 5G is owing to this espionage.
Not only security but also the fact that Chinese doesn't allow other companies to operate in their country then why should the Americans or any other nation allow the Chinese companies to do so? People on the other side of the argument are dumb simply because they don't realise that this is a game for the superpower status. China having one is not good.
@@vijagish01 Companies are allowed to operate in China as along as they follow their laws. When Chinese companies operate in the US, their servers are subjected to US government regulations as well. Apple is able to operate their Cloud service in China because they are willing to follow local regulations; Microsoft is able to operate their search engine in China because they too follow the regulations. Google and FB on the other refused to comply with local regulations due to some lofty ideals. Yet both of them have been proven to work with NSA and CIA to collect users information. This is hypocrisy at its fineness. PS Americans want to be the only superpower. They had crushed and will continue to crush any challengers to their superiority. So good luck India, unless Indians are content to be westerners' lackeys.
Sharvil Mainkar When you change the topic from protectionism accusation like “doesn’t allow other companies to operate in their country”(which is a ridiculously ignorant false accusation, China has been one of the largest FDI recipients for decades), to “the ONLY problem is their IPR laws”, you know you have lost the debate.
@@naveenarora6467 If it was a knave, on being asked "are u a knight" it would answer "yes" becoz it's a liar. So the true answer to the question: "if I asked u if u are a knight what would u answer" for the knave is "yes", but since the knave lies it will say "no".
This still doesn't make sense to me. The knave is bound to lie. Isn't this a binary choice? The knave must say yes to the question if it is a knight. If it said no, it would not have lied which breaks its rule. The knight meanwhile won't answer no when being asked this question. The person answering no could neither be a knight nor a knave in my opinion.
@@chrissytheconqueror7049 The question isn't "are u a knight". The question is "if I had asked u if u are a knight, what would u have answered". U are right that the knave always says yes on the first q. But it can't say yes to the second q becoz the 2nd q specifically asks what his ans. would be for the 1st q, and since it answers yes for 1st q answering yes to 2nd q would be telling the truth and thus the knave would always say no for the 2nd q. Reverse logic for knight.
11.14 yeah, a lot of economic sectors in China are still limiting foreign companies i.e banking, cars. In China foreign consumer products are always more expensive
@@TheMobiledoll strangely enough the China govt don't care to waste their energy if a few parents cant control their own kids to ban Fortnite or ban kinder eggs *coughcough*
@@ca-ke9493 But it is not an waste but an investment into the future. And its not a few parents is it? Video game addiction is very common. (And many parents don't really parent.) Do have any idea how much money is around video game entertainment industry. They are actually giving multiple scholarships in this. m.ua-cam.com/video/nrwbdXVZ5MI/v-deo.html
PolyMatter's tone and perspective sure changed a lot since this video was made and the HK protests happened. Hope things will go back to normal sometime soon.
What the heck, Amozon and many other US companies have business with US military. So can you say 'with the help of military', they became successful? ridiculus.
Do you notes that? Some videos about China have a lot in common. 1.Mao Zedong images. 2.Tiananmen Square images. 3.Police men or soldiers images. 4.A wrong National map of China. (always lost some parts). 5.amount 5mins at first CCP always be related. 6.some time you could see full of people in the "Great Hall of the People"" images. 7.Citizen of China were always be described a victim and oppressed. 8.political system "critical". 9.social system value "critical". 10.Chinese Army images. 11.Cargos transport harbor and Shanghai tower... 12. always said FB. google. sort of those companies get banned in China and never tell you historical reasons which they really did badly things to China. 13.When high tech info mentioned in China.after following the USA stuffs be referenced soon. 14.Capitalism-country companies came to China just "shown mercy not for money" like a lot of Jesus. bye.
Isn't it strange that the EU from all countries, the EU we know and love isn't saying anything about Huawei? Specially knowing the concern over privacy we have? I think that although everyone has their hands dirty, banning Huawei is just a strategic bad egoistic move of the US in order to keep their dominance in tech because if anyone would be keen on banning a surveillance company, it'd be the EU
Some feedback: Please be more obvious and transparent about when the advertisement seigway starts. Often, it's really confusing and it's annoying to end the video on a bad note 😅 Love love love learning so much about China from your channel! As an American, I can see how misunderstood the country is. Thank you for sharing!!
@@aronflip9353 Chinese government is actually indifferent to VPN unless people use it to do crimes. It is pretty convenient to get one via searching engine.
@@aronflip9353 If the internal web satisfies all people's needs, then there is no need to get access to the external internet. People who use vpn just want to catch up with entertainment field, such as following a singer on Instagram. Besides, we all know how politicians and some of the foreigners interpret China. I believe that it is a relief to stay away from the malice.
@@aronflip9353 I'm here for several reasons; one is following my favorite R6S content makers, another is just wanna see how ridiculous some people are in demonizing China.
@@aronflip9353 Sometimes it is hard to notice whether people you are talking to are Chinese since the conversations are settled in English. Otherwise, you will definitely be confused reading Chinese abbreviations.
It’s ridiculous. It’s so much energy to explore whether Huawei is listening to the government. A country’s enterprises must not harm the interests of their own country. You can see how the United States does it. As long as the country is willing, all companies must nominate.
You have to look at what the ownership structure actually does: it incentivizes increasing market share over increasing profits by rewarding middle management to work to death, and this occurs to the point it triggers anticompetitive pricing. In other words, this is a war production model applied to consumer goods. This leads to one of two outcomes: in a closed system it turns the company into a Cartel, if it has a competitor, the Cartels then fight for turf. The issue isn't so much one of state espionage as it is with corporate espionage, as the goal is market share, not profit, and what is better to increase market share than scooping up the customers of your competitor by forcing your competitor to close. This is very similar to Japanese companies in the 1970's. In an open system, it must therefore compete abroad and effectively dump its products abroad.
Excerpt from the book Operation Gladio: The Unholy Alliance between the Vatican, the CIA, and the Mafia by Paul L. Williams : "Throughout the 1990s, hundreds of Uyghurs were transported to Afghanistan by the CIA for training in guerrilla warfare by the mujahideen. When they returned to Xinjiang, they formed the East Turkistan Islamic Movement and came under Çatlı's expert direction. Graham Fuller, CIA superspy, offered this explanation for radicalizing the Chinese Muslims: The policy of guiding the evolution of Islam and of helping them [Muslims] against our adversaries worked marvelously well in Afghanistan against the Red Army. The same doctrines can still be used to destabilize what remains of Russian power, and especially to counter the Chinese influence in Central Asia. This policy of destabilization was devised by Bernard Lewis, an Oxford University specialist on Islamic studies, who called for the creation of an “Arc of Crisis” around the southern borders of the Soviet Union by empowering Muslim radicals to rebel against their Communist overlords."
If you’re hungry for more Huawei, Business Casual does a great job diving deeper into Huawei’s History: ua-cam.com/video/zIjVbcS02YM/v-deo.html Also, If you noticed I uncharacteristically left out Apple, that’s no mistake: more to come!
PolyMatter once again Big Thank You👊
Can't wait for that video. Literally just rushed up the stairs to watch your video on my tv when i saw the notification :)
@Mr. P. Enis Yeah I didn't want to delay the video just because of that
Can you do a video about EU and UK leaving?
According to Huawei CEO, all of you "promoted" Huawei products XD
Wendover - Planes
PolyMatter - China
NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT!
His North Korea essay was great too
RealLifeLore: Toyota Corolla
How about a co-production between Wendover and PolyMatter for a video on Chinese Planes?
Mustard - Planes
Half as interesting - Small islands/Lonlyist place in world
"There is a lot of smoke here, but there is also a lot of interests trying to convince you of fire"
I love that.
There is also a lot of fucking fire. War is just a continuation of politics and politics is just as dirty as war.
@@AV-nl9gc humans fucking die in war though. (No, I don't hate u and I don't want to start a war in this comment section either.)
I love how he said China is misunderstood, because it really is.
The only misunderstanding about china is how bad their gov't is for most everyone inside and outside china. Most people, even after corona, are hardly aware of all the meddling that country is doing.
Because there is fire.
When you binge-watch Polymatter videos, you gain the ability to foresee the ads transition.
So true
True
News about China
PolyMatter: it's free real estate.
Only news about China I watch is China Uncensored
@@normaaliihminen722 China Uncensored is so clearly propagandist brainwashing.
@@normaaliihminen722 I think you'll develop a highly biased view that way. China Uncensored is not exactly known for good research and objectivity.
the same the chinese buy in other countries , ironically
@@AntonMochalin Taiwanese laugh so hard :)
That transition to the ads was just phenomenal.
I can't realize it is ads until the product page
it was propaganda that americans say truth and chinese lie....terrible racisam and nationalisam
It's invasive though.
this comment was paid for by brilliant
It was brilliant*
It's pretty much two of the largest economies playing diplomacy on each other for their monopoly on security/surveillance/power/everything within their country with the passive goal of removing the competition
Only difference China will not be able to cheat as much now...ie if Trump for once holds on to his guns and there is bipartisanship in the Congress in future with regards to dealing with China..
@@ameyas7726 The continents of Americas and elsewhere around the world are stolen by the European people, what are you talking about ?
@@themiddlekingdom9121 You are comparing what Europeans did in the middle ages to what Chinese Commie party is stealing now!!!...Two wrongs don't make a right..
@@ameyas7726 It doesn't get anything to do with two wrongs make a right, I just stated exactly what happened. Talking about the IP thief, it happened everywhere since human being existed on this planet earth, almost the EU countries are using Latin alphabets, that meant the other countries' people within EU stole the alphabets from the Italian people invented. And the Italian stole the idea from the Greek, the Greek stole the alphabets idea from the ancient
Phoenicians invented alphabets and the list go on and on.
ua-cam.com/video/i0rFoaxTDt4/v-deo.html
I find this whole conflict hilarious since China grew so big thanks to the soviets giving them tons of machinery, training, investments, and materials. Then in the 70s when the Soviets piggy banks were running dry the chinese opened up to the west and got various governments, NGOs, and the World Bank/IBRD to give them tons of money to develop (which they still get today sadly) and to further boost their economy they whore themselves out to any foreign investors they can find. The PRC is almost entirely built of foreign investors but they love to pretend it's thanks to the CCP. This is also without mentioning all the stealing the CCP does with stealing tech and underworld activities like forgeries, hacking, dealing drugs, etc.
The US is pretty stupid too in that despite the evil the CCP does, the threat they pose, and all the thieving they do the US has done almost NOTHING to get china to act better
I'm becoming a pro when it comes to detecting the start of sponsored plugs
Yep, I've gotten so good that I just skip the entire video... tsk-tsk
Anything neutral to positive is state sponsored to brainwashed mutts. This video is neutral and state sponsored. Keep consuming your democracy propaganda. Democracy sponsoring coups, bombing the middle East, and bring the biggest threat to world peace.
@@kevinlification Lol
I smell the 50 cent army
in this one his voice changed a bit from the former (probably a separate recording) and that light background music gave it away
His iPhone cost one was seriously seamless though
...Why do I feel the sudden urge to plant a tree?
Do it
Yea, please do it.
And building rockets
Because your gay?
@@Usammityduzntafraidofanythin Don't be salty
7:34 idk, wouldn’t the French have most incentive to lie about that sort of thing? They used to have an absolute strangle grip on Africa and are losing it to China.
Guess China just gave the union that headquarters because they liked them then.
They HAVE* not used to
PolyMatter: Economic
Infographic Show: Serial Killers
HAI: Random interesting things
Wendover: Planes
Atlas Pro: Geography
Casual Navigation: Ships
RLL: Disasters and extinction
Extra Credit: Populary history
Business Casual: Well, Business
Lemmino: Best documentaries!
Mustard: Transportations
Facts bruh
whats short for HAI please tell me
@@jasonbourney3869 half as interesting, the best channel on youtube
Coldfusion makes legit best documentaries
@@hardrock342 and HAI covers the coolest short stories
I swear 20% of the reason I watch polymatter videos is to marvel at how seamless the ad transitions are 😂
Same. Segway heaven.
@@CrispyBaconYT555 I'm sure you meant to say segue right? 😉
@@suprenormal Now that's just the most backwards spelling of a word. And yes.
Basically there's a back door in all tech.
however, there was no evidence in Huawei.
Obviously they shouldn't be persecuting Huawei for standard practices in the industry. Anything that can update the firmware has a backdoor.. like your router.
Facts are CIA wanted Apple to install special backdoors on iPhones, and Trump wanted American companies to install backdoors.
you know facebook leaks all personal information to cambridge analytics... Why American companies always deceive their own people? It is not reasonable.
If you cannot find any backdoors one one device, such as Huawei and say there is a backdoor, also you cannot deny there may be backdoors on other US Govenment-convinced devices.
2:40 I did read the whole thing thank you very much
did you go plant a tree?
#METOO
The leftmost one says *Bye Good* instead of Goodbye. xD
This is a totally legal and totally cool document which describes, announces and otherwise rambles about corporate stuff like for example the name of the company and what it is called and where its located but i could honestly just write anything here because who is going to pause the video and read this? and of that small subsection of people, how many will get this far are you into reading this? seriously, why are you reading this? this is a boring document and im just trying to emulate how boring it is with small text poor grammar no periods mistakes etc. and yet you continue to read it why what are you doing like go plant a tree or something like just think of all the things in the universe that you could be doing seriously someone is making rockets right now and you keep reading this what are you doing please reconsider go make a rocket or at least plant a tree you know what, you do you! ok bye good luck.
@@hasifaiman I think it's by good luck.
Thanks for tackling this complex issue. Do you personally trust them?
I don't
I dont trust both of em
You really shouldn't trust any company, most companies only care about profit and how they could profit because of you.
Chemicals in the water are turning the frogs gay
Archon JK and how do they make profit? By trying to please you.
10:58 a very important point I don’t see being discussed
yes they want us to use their devices but won't let their people use ours. Fishy...
I agree with the restrictions imposed to those multinationals. FB, Google, Twitter, online games, among others are only interested in their benefits, so they are addictive and nocive to the users. Also, in that way, they incentivated the development of national solutions that now serves in this commercial war. Imagine if they depended on google, and with this sanctions all of them were incomunicated.
And, of course, ALWAYS US has spied to every country, invaded, sanctioned, imposed, and much more even to allied countries.
@@GavriJ We sure can use your devices like Iphones. The ban is mostly on online websites. And obviously although you guys are not banned to use Chinese social media, you probably won't use it. So it seems fair to me.
@@znco180 It's about the software that comes with the device, not the device itself.
@@GavriJ Software/website/social media, whatever you call them. We use a lot of your softwares, adobe tools, steam/epic and the games, chrome, bing, you name it. So far I believe the only popular Chinese software in the west is TikTok, which just experienced a ban. So who's fishy?
Did you mention the 10 backdoors in Cisco equipment(6 of which were new and didn't exist before) and the two well constructed backdoors in Juniper equipment which was traced back to the NSA?
Everyone already knows US gov spies on people or don't you remember Snowden
My question: One of the two countries spies to protect their country and the whole world, while the other country spies to steal technologies and to rule the world. What country do you take side?
@@jaybonline Obviously the one without more than a hundred military bases around the world and bug the phones of world leaders.
yes..juniper
juniper got a backorder in 2012
with a lot of tracks to solve and they refused to take action
now its to late
@@SA2004YG the chinese government is extremely oppressive and intrusive on its citizens rights, much more than the USA is. Their president just decided he wasnt going to leave for fuck sake. That should tell you everything you need to know about bullshit china.
6:55 "But Huawei is no ordinary company; it has a long
history of alleged misbehavior. It’s CFO was, quite prominently, arrested in Canada on the grounds of violating US sanctions on Iran."
Damm, not respecting unilateral sanctions the US imposed on another country of the world is bad behavior... ? Ok lol, it didn't know the US is the supreme judge of the world
7:32 "Then, last year, a French newspaper..." - Show the Financial Times - Meh, as a French I don't know I should feel upset or honored lol
"A French news paper quoting anonymous technicians". This sounds like solid evidence😒
The No.1 solid news source in the history of modern journalism: A person who was briefed on the matter.
a m Anonymous sources are prevalent throughout journalism, accurate or inaccurate. Do you think people who leak classified files for the most part want to be recognised? You have to judge the newspaper and its history, not the fact that it uses anonymous sources
@@bachhoang8794 This isn't classified though. This is just some people who don't at all need to remain anonymous. Most journalism the US fakes includes anonymous sources.
@@darrishawks6033 What exactly do you think china would do to someone who exposes something like this? specially when they live in a third world country which makes disappearing someone all the easier.
@@bluerath considering that all of the "China disappears people" is based on these lies, I assume nothing lol
Idk why but I found the thumbnail really attractive.
Same
It's all the layers I guess. Gives it space and depth. Also there's some sick colour play going on
thats probably because it's a really fucking good thumbnail
In what way?
At first, I thought this video is sponsored by Huawei
But then you inspected the history of the video? :P :D
this video is sponsored by huawei? sounds like it
Meh it was both good and bad about Huawei. To me it actually seemed a bit more on the USA side than Huawei all together; especially with the conclusion part. Like if we can't trust any country other than our own to manifacture equipment of infrastructure then how will this world work? That'd be super expensive. Every western country would have to develop and manifacture infrastructure independantly. It's insane. If foreign is argument of safety (rather than quality deep dive control over product) it's ridiculous one. It means UK can't have USA technology coz it's foreign and so on.
@@matrixfull it's about the control the Chinese government has over companies in its country
@@TheCrippledCreeper It's the same how the US government controlled google, facebook, cisco, microsoft etc.
Remember the Patriot Act my fellow Americans. Remember how our own government treats us
still better than china
Riky is spot on. proof Huawei copies technology is that it copied the shadow government funded by DARPA's 3-letter agencies and operating in silicon valley.
China copies everything, including the US replacement for Operation Mockingbird.
Why you want to overthrow China, the Chinese are not willing 为什么你要推翻中国，中国人不愿意
@@Isometrix116 You are full of pride and prejudice. I live in China, I know the facts, and you do n’t know, you may not have been to China. You think I am a slave to the Communist Party, but I think you are a slave to the capitalist.
@@Isometrix116 No, there isn't an exception for "good and loyal citizens". He's probably using a VPN. The great fire wall requires a VPN to bypass and the CCP must allow VPNs to exist in order to allow businesses to operate. This means that the public can also access the internet, mostly to dogpile anyone that disrespects China... the country that has cordoned them off from the rest of the world.
I freaking love your videos! Every upload is just perfect!
But there's something I like even more: Your sponsorship transitions. They hit you completely out of the blue because you think its all part of the video and just fits so perfectly!
Keep it up👍👍
I like how this guy, even while he has formed his opinion, presents all aspects of a debate and is only coming to logical conclusions. Great work bud !
So many China videos.
Hold your breath for 3 seconds if you're being held.
So many China videos... that chinese will never see
@@robertoaguiar6230 傻逼吧
@@robertoaguiar6230 I'm sitting in Beijing right now it's called a VPN
@@timwilson6527 VPNs are illegal in China so you are also a criminal by their own laws.
Oh shit
USA: *Snaps*
HUAWEI: *Mr. China, I don't feel very good...*
The even bigger picture:
It is USA tradition to work with High Tech and every companies to monitor the whole world.
Most governments do this, it's just the USA that's extra hypocritical about FREEEDOOOM
@@DavidGarcia-oi5nt like the word 'hypocritical'
Yeah, but the US doesn't do this: China kidnaps and tortures Canadian diplomats, has a Nazi "living space" genocide in Tibet, puts a MILLION Uyghars in Concentration Camps, their children in other Concentration Camps, that's the Dem's argument for bombing China back to the Stone Age, just like Germany '45. Kim has US boomer subs on China's doorstep, Dictator-Fanboy Trump's own polling says he's done, and the Dems idealize Canada, HATE Putin, and have GOP backing to STOMP China. Xi and Putin are SCREWED.
China might have gotten away with just the Nazi-inspired genocide in Tibet, but harvesting organs from innocent citizens, plus the Uyghar horror, and now extorting a Western country like Canada, who can politically bridge the EU, UK, and Aussies with the US against China: glaring mistakes.
Seperating families is a hot-button issue for the Dems, they are spending MILLIONS on it next year whipping up a frenzy to crush Trump, and China just admitted they did it on a vast, Nazi scale. OOPS!
I majored in History: Germany in '45 will be China's new look if Xi doesn't stop his Hitler-'35 act, and if China thinks Realpolitic justifies Xi's current arrogance and brutality, bombed back to the Stone Age is the real Realpolitic, just ask Germany.
Don't get me started on what a Dem President is willing to do to Putin.
Just sayin...;)
[reposted]
Such Anti-Americanism here. Its just used to crack down on terrorists, goodness.
The USA will only work with US tech. Not harmless Huawei.
China: exist
Polymatter: I smell monetization.
Polymatter: Makes a video which criticize China
China: You are now on a black list and will be followed or jailed if you come here.
@喵呜 Now he is in USA.
Huawei phones before the ban: Exist
Trump: Why did I not ban it when Huawei started making phones using Android?
@喵呜 Chinese: I Don't understand sarcasm, guess I'll get triggered.
@S H Chinese: I Don't understand sarcasm, guess I'll get triggered.
Ok I'm going to plant a tree
once it grow up stick in your asssssssss.
@@poojanpatel2437 Honestly, planting trees would be a good idea.
"OoOoOo phantoms, spooky sounding"
This is why people love this channel
You got me!!!!!
My hat's off to your production team for using the analogy from the American Psycho! Clap Clap champ!
“Because ‘little’ and ‘red’ were taken” omg lol 10/10 joke
It's China. They likely named the book that way to please the government.
What does that mean?
@@chan6565 Look up the little red book buddy
@@piedpiper1172 Yea it's a shopping platform but what does it have to do with Huawei's blue book?
Edit: Ok it's not entirely a shopping platform, but still I don't get it.
Edit 2: Ok now I see it, it's Mao's little red book.
@@chan6565 yep xd boot licking name
The way you segue from content into sponsor promotion is MASTERFUL. Well done, sir. I always listen to the ad just out of respect for such a seamless transition.
Me too!
I think this is the most objective view on this issue (Huawei, trade war etc) I have ever seen on UA-cam. Thank you for the vivid presentation.
- Greetings from a Chinese viewer.
You're not supposed to be on youtube.... to the gulag!!!!
@Ecological Warrior the joke>>>>>
You dumbass
..... where’s the joke at -chinese viewer
@@jackni2435 the whole thing. "To the gulog" is a known joke as an exaggerated punishment. See, in the civilized world, no one gets sent to the gulog. So that's the joke.
Two rather important more points.
1: Huawei staff has been found guilty of spying in Poland. Directly connected to their hardware.
2: The Chinese government has a rich history of just taking over private companies, blaming some crime on the owners. It does not matter that much who ownes Huawei now, it matters, that there is the risk of losing support for the hardwareinfrastructure if the Chinese gov wants to.
look how does USA gov control their private companies.
@SourPls no. Google, Microsoft, hp, dell forcing trump administration to lift trade sanctions. But trump don't care them. Actually trump theartened google by filing anti trust suit against them
Huawei former staff spying in Poland was an individual action according to a spokesman for the Polish security service and it has nothing to do with hardware. Get your fact straight.
www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jan/11/huawei-employee-arrested-in-poland-over-chinese-spy-allegations
@朴萧圣 How about you google it?
Oh wait, are you in China?
How about you use a VPN and google it... lazy bastard...
@@JokoCi Rather irrelevant, but you do know that you can't access UA-cam without a VPN in China right?
I am literally watching this on UA-cam (google) which I downloaded of the play Store (google) on a Huawei (banned) like bruh
same
The ban isn't retroactive. and the software ban only says they can't collaborate with Google, Huawei will still have access to the open-source versions of Android that Google publishes for everyone.
The news article I read said they can't collaborate to get Google services integrated into the phones, but they can't have that in China anyway.
@Mister Christopher I thought comment section of this channel would be smarter
Me roo
@@kiddostyleyt yes, same lol, the ban is not fully in affect Huawei have a temporary license that allows them to give any Huawei device that was released before the ban updates on software (this license is soon to expire with no current news as to whether another extension will be granted) so for the time being enjoy also the apps will continue working since they already have GMS etc... just no updates so even when the license expires you and I will still watch UA-cam, use google maps etc...
and more and more apps are using Harmony OS and can be found on Huawei app gallery (there is a Wishlist that you can now use to request apps that you want on their app gallery that is not currently available.
*Man, the editing of those videos is fine AF.*
10:55 "The other side of that very profitable coin"
_Spins it 360 instead of 180_
*Hello, it's the new me*
Ferrari Fred hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!!!
Every time I click on PolyMatters videos, I know that an ad is coming.
10:05
In China, ships travel backwards
Good information and great explanation!
I appreciate the work that you do for your ad transitions. Most excellent work.
Well phantom shares aren't anything abnormal we also have this law form in Germany its called Genossenschaft.
No but they dont confer ownership and are misleading which is why he mentions them
Yeah, but it sounds so much better in German . . . . . . "Synthetic shares" . . . . "Meh"
"Genossenschaft . . . . . . . . . ." . . . .*shivers "Go on . . . . .tell me more"
I read Hawaii and was very confused, I realized until about halfway through the video.
I thought he was talking about the american island of Hawaii the whole time!
4:05 the words are “do not touch”
"Oooo ... Phantom, Spooky sounding" 😂😂
Video: Politics
UA-cam: *#40 TRENDING FOR GAMING*
PolyMatter YT channel is a pathway to ad transitions that many consider to be...unnatural
In your example at the end, wouldn't neither ever say no?
If you asked a knight they would say yes they are because they always tell the truth
If you asked a knave, they would say yes, because they always lie
Either way they should never say no.
Yeah you're supposed to ask them what the other guy would say if you'd ask them. If you're asking the knight, the knave would've lied and said yes so the knight says yes. If you ask the knave however, the knight would've said yes so you get no. Either way you know who's who
Wow, how can PM produce such a video and not mention WTO and only tangentially mention the PRC's merchantilism at the very end?
Wow, just first time to recognize that the employee union is that powerful...Actually, in my view, the union is totally nothing but a loose organization. Huawei is controlled by its executive board.
"UNION"
Here's a fun fact about Huawei: They've never published a CVE, ever. A CVE is a Common Vulnerability and Exposure. It's basically a system that attempts to standardize the publishing and documentation of a vulnerability in a particular piece of hardware, software, or both. It's run by non-profit research organization funded by US Homeland Security. Basically everyone has published CVEs, Apple, Google, telco companies, etc, except for Huawei. The first time Huawei published a CVE for anything, was a direct response to a Defcon talk in which it was pointed out that they'd never published a CVE. Absolutely classic stuff. You can watch a deep dive into their security here: ua-cam.com/video/w-K1YpJp07s/v-deo.html
Their security is hilarious because their codebase is shit. I don't believe they really steal code en masse, but what they *did* do, in the case of Cisco IOS, was copied how it works. They copied one of the routing methods (EIGRP, basically it's how routers talk to eachother), and they copied the documentation, but this was mainly done for convenience sake - so if you know how to use IOS, like I've studies, then you or I will automatically know how to use Huawei as well, because it's functionally the same. The code is different, though, and it's pretty bad. That video is well worth a watch if this stuff interests you at all.
Polymatter and China, name a more iconic duo :)
Wendover productions and airlines
Kimi Räikkönen and vodka
Bethesda and EA
'If I asked if you were a knight, what would you say'
'No'.
A knight would say yes.
So he's a knave. He lies because he would actually say yes, but since he is a liar, he lies about that too and says no.
the knave *will always lie*, the knave's answer will have to be 'yes'. by your 'logic' if u ask a liar if he is a liar he would say yes. so the right answer is 'they' are neither knights nor knaves
Hongster Hong No
@@jjw238 'always lie' is as predictable as 'never lies', if u r a fat liar and i ask u if u r fat, by your logic ur answer is 'yes'. r u a fat liar?
@@brainwashington1332 Uh, what? The liar always lies. So if you ask the liar if he's a liar, he's going to say no. Jj W is right.
I got that far into reading it...
I also promise not to touch the giant blue book.
Huawei is a private company. A company hold by union is different than state. If a company share almost all its profit with employees. it doesn't make scene for others to hold its 'union' stock. Same thing happened on Japan's companies 30 years ago, so it is not a system problem also.
Pollymatter- home to the world’s smoothest sponsorship segways
Fascinating. Really good job covering as many sides as you can, it can be difficult with complex issues such as this.
The problem with Huawei situation is, the common people has no way of understanding how difficult it is to covertly steal data using 5G equipment. Can you put a backdoor into your router/os/software? The answer is definitely yes. Can you keep it a secret? If you are planning to use the said backdoor, the answer is definitely no. It doesn't matter how good your programmers are. The rest of the world's programmers will always be better. And when a piece of equipment is as distrusted as Huawei's stuff tend to be, you can be sure the top reverse engineers accross the world will race against each other to find the slightest indication of a back door.
In my personal opinion, Huawei is definitely controlled by the Chinese government. But that doesn't mean they can put backdoors into those equipments willy nilly. Beucase if someone catches a backdoor in a Cisco router, they can say "we were using it for testing and accidentally left it in the production mode" and the world will believe them. If the same happens with a Huawei equioment, it will be the end of them. So they simply can't risk it. Yet.
Down the line, in 10 years, if they manage to get their equipment every corner of the word, they might get more brazen (like the google is) but currently, i don't think they'd risk putting any kind of nefarious code.
well, China never ban any international telecom companies from doing business in China. That is part of the reason, why Huawei is one of the most successful Chinese company in the global market. Because, the domestic market was taken by international telecom companies by that time. So the claim that China is protecting by banning FB, Twitter, google to protect Huawei does not make sense. Not only because these companies are not direct competitors of Huawei, also it is impossible for a company to become successful merely since the protection from the government.
China has a dubious history with corporate espionage that is very likely to have benefited its tech companies. I am not suggesting that Western companies do not or have not behaved similarly in the past, nor that there are no US companies with close affiliation to the state, but China's strategic advantage in 5G is owing to this espionage.
Not to mention Huawei employees are encouraged to get rivals data by any means. If reddit post are anything to go by...
8:27 "millions" of dollars doesn't sound like a lot of money in national-level economic dealings, even without security issues at stake.
Not only security but also the fact that Chinese doesn't allow other companies to operate in their country then why should the Americans or any other nation allow the Chinese companies to do so? People on the other side of the argument are dumb simply because they don't realise that this is a game for the superpower status. China having one is not good.
@@vijagish01 Companies are allowed to operate in China as along as they follow their laws. When Chinese companies operate in the US, their servers are subjected to US government regulations as well. Apple is able to operate their Cloud service in China because they are willing to follow local regulations; Microsoft is able to operate their search engine in China because they too follow the regulations. Google and FB on the other refused to comply with local regulations due to some lofty ideals. Yet both of them have been proven to work with NSA and CIA to collect users information. This is hypocrisy at its fineness.
PS Americans want to be the only superpower. They had crushed and will continue to crush any challengers to their superiority. So good luck India, unless Indians are content to be westerners' lackeys.
@@dirkstrickland135 bruh the only problem with China is their IPR laws which are existent to none.
Sharvil Mainkar When you change the topic from protectionism accusation like “doesn’t allow other companies to operate in their country”(which is a ridiculously ignorant false accusation, China has been one of the largest FDI recipients for decades), to “the ONLY problem is their IPR laws”, you know you have lost the debate.
You're probably one of the best video essay video makers on the topic of China.
If you're stuck on the ending riddle, think off it as a two step problem and work backwards
That question at the end:
the answer is Knave.
But. Y
@@naveenarora6467
If it was a knave, on being asked "are u a knight" it would answer "yes" becoz it's a liar. So the true answer to the question: "if I asked u if u are a knight what would u answer" for the knave is "yes", but since the knave lies it will say "no".
Clever boy
This still doesn't make sense to me. The knave is bound to lie. Isn't this a binary choice? The knave must say yes to the question if it is a knight. If it said no, it would not have lied which breaks its rule. The knight meanwhile won't answer no when being asked this question. The person answering no could neither be a knight nor a knave in my opinion.
@@chrissytheconqueror7049
The question isn't "are u a knight". The question is "if I had asked u if u are a knight, what would u have answered". U are right that the knave always says yes on the first q. But it can't say yes to the second q becoz the 2nd q specifically asks what his ans. would be for the 1st q, and since it answers yes for 1st q answering yes to 2nd q would be telling the truth and thus the knave would always say no for the 2nd q. Reverse logic for knight.
just remind you guys, snowden is still running
You can't let them forget... Assange is not free and we are not either!!!
This is some next level journalism!!!
A bit like how the US protects apple, Microsoft, Boeing etc
And the biggest of all, the USD. All US companies are protected by the USD being the reserve currency. The biggest cheat code of all.
@@andresiniesta9955 better than china, fucking commies who want to control every aspect of your life
China : bans facebok, youtube, google, instagram, etc.
USA : bans Huawei
China : *pikachu face*
My question is: how did Evan (Polymatter's creator) know so much about China and crank out a video every 2 weeks?
It’s called research, everything is on the internet these days
@@supersonic3737 lol 😂 that’s how drinking bleach injecting sunlight and protesting mask decisions were made, based on internet research
11.14 yeah, a lot of economic sectors in China are still limiting foreign companies i.e banking, cars. In China foreign consumer products are always more expensive
It's not foreign products more expensive, it is Chinese products much cheaper, insanely cheap in most cases.
@@htht7831 if you believe that is a natural phenomenon, I have a bridge to sell you.
The best sponsored ad is one where the viewer doesn't realize he has started watching one
I'm watching this through my Huawei phone lol 😂
love huawei
Well I'm watching you on your huawei phone as well
@@patbiss7742 😆😂😂🤣
Winnie the pooh knows that already
Huawei Is A Great Company!
Can't get enough of such useful content!
That transition into the brilliant ad was absolutely seamless. I see you.
After watching this I going to get a Huawei p30 pro
PolyMatter & Business Casual make a video about Huawei 1 hour apart, coincidence? I think not.
Polymatter more balance while business casual is more bias to Western politics.
Mate the proper puzzle is "if I asked the other guy what you would answer with, what would he say?"
Interesting stuff. I do suggest using a better map projection though since that one is very heavily skewed.
9:49 I live here in China and I play Fortnite for as long as I want to, please government I beg you to help me control myself, for real!
Wait i thought tiger moms among others in China had pressured politicians into limiting that?
@@TheMobiledoll strangely enough the China govt don't care to waste their energy if a few parents cant control their own kids to ban Fortnite or ban kinder eggs *coughcough*
@@ca-ke9493 But it is not an waste but an investment into the future. And its not a few parents is it? Video game addiction is very common.
(And many parents don't really parent.)
Do have any idea how much money is around video game entertainment industry.
They are actually giving multiple scholarships in this.
m.ua-cam.com/video/nrwbdXVZ5MI/v-deo.html
Make a video on Edward Snowden's claim, please
10:10 the boats are moving backwards, China must have some super technology
Umm 0 times 16 is still 0
Please go to school before commenting on UA-cam. common sense is important
A balanced and well documented insight into the topic. Great job, new subscriber here!
Under Mao, the number of private companies was basically zero
Awhile after Xiaoping came into power, that number was already 16 times higher.
He meant the number of people employed
Basically zero means close to zero
You really should go to school and get educated before commenting on UA-cam
"This applies to a lot of Chinese companies. It would be ridiculous to ban all of them"
Well, would it actually?
PolyMatter's tone and perspective sure changed a lot since this video was made and the HK protests happened. Hope things will go back to normal sometime soon.
I'm curious about that knight and knave riddle. How does it work? Do I get to ask the question or is the question you asked the only one?
What the heck, Amozon and many other US companies have business with US military. So can you say 'with the help of military', they became successful? ridiculus.
Your spelling is ridiculous
Do you notes that?
Some videos about China have a lot in common.
1.Mao Zedong images.
2.Tiananmen Square images.
3.Police men or soldiers images.
4.A wrong National map of China. (always lost some parts).
5.amount 5mins at first CCP always be related.
6.some time you could see full of people in the "Great Hall of the People"" images.
7.Citizen of China were always be described a victim and oppressed.
8.political system "critical".
9.social system value "critical".
10.Chinese Army images.
11.Cargos transport harbor and Shanghai tower...
12. always said FB. google. sort of those companies get banned in China and never tell you historical reasons which they really did badly things to China.
13.When high tech info mentioned in China.after following the USA stuffs be referenced soon.
14.Capitalism-country companies came to China just "shown mercy not for money" like a lot of Jesus.
bye.
I just see Huawei as an easy way to say hi to the Chinese... Sometimes I like to wave to my camera xD
1815Offixial wtf I don’t want to see ur stupid ass. Stop it get some help.
@@potatonoodlebear80351989年天安门广场大屠杀
C0nserve Lol,it doesn’t really work like that
@@potatonoodlebear8035 lmao then why spy on me bro... Exactly... Tactics to not be spied on by China while using huawei phones :P
@@1815Offixial the Chinese is watching! they are everywhere!
Isn't it strange that the EU from all countries, the EU we know and love isn't saying anything about Huawei? Specially knowing the concern over privacy we have?
I think that although everyone has their hands dirty, banning Huawei is just a strategic bad egoistic move of the US in order to keep their dominance in tech because if anyone would be keen on banning a surveillance company, it'd be the EU
Some feedback: Please be more obvious and transparent about when the advertisement seigway starts. Often, it's really confusing and it's annoying to end the video on a bad note 😅 Love love love learning so much about China from your channel! As an American, I can see how misunderstood the country is. Thank you for sharing!!
9:49
As a Chinese, I have to say your words are insane.
@@aronflip9353 Chinese government is actually indifferent to VPN unless people use it to do crimes. It is pretty convenient to get one via searching engine.
@@aronflip9353 Well, absolutely not too much(~1%). And maybe all the world sees China as a demon. That's it.
@@aronflip9353 If the internal web satisfies all people's needs, then there is no need to get access to the external internet. People who use vpn just want to catch up with entertainment field, such as following a singer on Instagram. Besides, we all know how politicians and some of the foreigners interpret China. I believe that it is a relief to stay away from the malice.
@@aronflip9353 I'm here for several reasons; one is following my favorite R6S content makers, another is just wanna see how ridiculous some people are in demonizing China.
@@aronflip9353 Sometimes it is hard to notice whether people you are talking to are Chinese since the conversations are settled in English. Otherwise, you will definitely be confused reading Chinese abbreviations.
WOW! Those graphics are stunning!!
It’s ridiculous. It’s so much energy to explore whether Huawei is listening to the government. A country’s enterprises must not harm the interests of their own country. You can see how the United States does it. As long as the country is willing, all companies must nominate.
Who's watching from a Huawei?
Me lol
Watching from my iPhone because I enjoy showing the NSA my flaccid dick.
Me ahah
@@animerocks2468 LOL😂
That sponsor transition was...Brilliant
YEEAAAAHHHH!!!!!!
You have to look at what the ownership structure actually does: it incentivizes increasing market share over increasing profits by rewarding middle management to work to death, and this occurs to the point it triggers anticompetitive pricing. In other words, this is a war production model applied to consumer goods. This leads to one of two outcomes: in a closed system it turns the company into a Cartel, if it has a competitor, the Cartels then fight for turf. The issue isn't so much one of state espionage as it is with corporate espionage, as the goal is market share, not profit, and what is better to increase market share than scooping up the customers of your competitor by forcing your competitor to close. This is very similar to Japanese companies in the 1970's. In an open system, it must therefore compete abroad and effectively dump its products abroad.
PolyMatter: China = red dragon
AD&D: red dragon = chaotic evil
Coincidence? I think NOT! :)
Yeah but they are lawful evil lol
@@aaronchristensen8333 not with IP
Excerpt from the book Operation Gladio: The Unholy Alliance between the Vatican, the CIA, and the Mafia by Paul L. Williams : "Throughout the 1990s, hundreds of Uyghurs were transported to Afghanistan by the CIA for training in guerrilla warfare by the mujahideen. When they returned to Xinjiang, they formed the East Turkistan Islamic Movement and came under Çatlı's expert direction. Graham Fuller, CIA superspy, offered this explanation for radicalizing the Chinese Muslims: The policy of guiding the evolution of Islam and of helping them [Muslims] against our adversaries worked marvelously well in Afghanistan against the Red Army. The same doctrines can still be used to destabilize what remains of Russian power, and especially to counter the Chinese influence in Central Asia. This policy of destabilization was devised by Bernard Lewis, an Oxford University specialist on Islamic studies, who called for the creation of an “Arc of Crisis” around the southern borders of the Soviet Union by empowering Muslim radicals to rebel against their Communist overlords."
@@aaronchristensen8333 Good call!