10 years is the latest one they have been watching over a ten year period a black hole consumed a star 7 times the mass of our sun. Spewing some mass out of the black hole as radio waves at speeds close to the speed of light.
The energy generated is outside the event horizon so can escape. The infall energy of matter is Einstein E=mc**2 level 100 times more than a simple supernova explosion for the same mass star.. What enters the black hole cannot be observed but around half of the matter and energy is radiated and warped by pressure and fields into the jets and expelled rather than falling below the event horizon. The energy is so great that for proportion the picture of the swirling disk is more like what we would see through welding goggles filters over a mile/1.6km thick. Not that we or the filter would survive long :-).
I CN BELIEIVE IT. I THINK IF YOU STAND IN FRONT OF ME. I WILL HAVE TO BELIEIVE MY EYES R LYING ON ME. ANR WAYS WISHING YOU GUYS ALL THE SUCCESS N WISHES N BLESSINGS.
this is why i am staying alive, fighting my depression and anxiety. nature, space and time is so fun to look at and learn about. This universe is truly unique
Mrcheekymonkey1996 brother the only cure is in the rememberance of Allah subhanahu wa teala, if you know that every created thing needs a mind:knowledge and cant come into existence from nothing you may find the straight path inshaAllah
I would rather see the data and visual evidence from the satellites then an artist rendering don't hog all the evidence let us have a look. This is like showing us a painting of an event and saying see i told you it was true .
+Travis polson The make of this video is to illustrate the new finding of how the Black Hole shreds passing Star. It is just to make lines of texts from theory into a thing easier to understand. Off course, who knows, it might be wrong, but this is all we know about it. For the visual evidence, the process of activities from the very-large scale object like this take time - long long time. Our satellites cannot capture all of them. We can just observe a little piece of the entire process, we might have only the steps that the Black Hole already ate the star, but what was happened before that? We don't know, so we need the theory to find that what's going on there(possible to be), what's next and the rendering process can show us how it actually works from the context of its theory -- something like making a movie from a book.
+Travis polson I agree, but the point of this is not to show you exactly how it happens since we can't see yet, it's to show you that with the data we've got, it's an accurate depiction of how we think it'd happen, which can lead to greater understanding. Kip Thorne did a shit ton of work on the movie Interstellar to make an accurate visual of a black hole, and the work he did on it was the basis of many papers that furthered our understanding. This video may not be accurate. But so far as we know, we think it is. Ya dig?
People calling this video out as being animated. Nice job. I picture you trying to push a triangle block through a circle hole and wondering why it doesn't fit.
people who say this is fake, you should know that this video is an artist rendition Based on data that we already have. yes, the video is fake, but what it shows is what would happen based on the information we have. there is no possible way to observe a black hole shredding a star up close. the universe is a big place, light it self takes 4 years just to reach the nearest star to our own.
Great CGI work! When I see animations like this showing a black hole moving across space and distorting the light of stars, it looks similar to the refraction you'd get with that of a glass lens. Maybe black holes are actually not black, but more like a transparent sphere distorting the light.
At 0:17 it shows that the core of the star dissipates around into space while the black hole strips and sucks in the lighter outside layers with ease. Stars have heaviest elements created by fusion, and than deposited in their center, (just like iron oxide falls off to the ocean floor). Why would the heavy star's core puff away like that...as if it was made up of lightweight elements... I think this computed simulation is wrong or not complete, any ideas?
Is there any documented footage of a black hole where we can see what’s in front and behind it? (As if we were looking at the black hole at an angle, instead of straight on) Thanks!
I'm no astrophysicist but... once the disk forms, shouldn't gravitational lensing make it look a bit more bizarre? like the one in the movie interstellar?
I'll say this once again, the neutron star exists inside any planet that has a eletromagnetic field, some planets are just spheres with no functions, universe give to his planets his own spherical shape, this simple happens becase two dimmensions with opposit charges are coliding at the border, transposing one another much like two circles passing one for the other, in the middle as long as they are transponding a third little eliptic form stars to form, still having flat surfaces and inside this new dimmension two forces are being applyed from the food, the food at the borders are shoking dark matter or anti-mater with probably matter, the result is dark energy, dark matter can be simple dark matter heated up by radiation, and dark energy could simple be dark matter in its cold state, the thing is as long as the two dimmensions keeps transponding one another, this trird new dimmension at the middle starts to became more spheric and the flow of dark energy getting weaker.... see there are two forces compression and expansion, as long as the two dimmensions keeps transponding one the other, the expansion make the third dimmension expand itself and with this the density of dark energy inside of it get thin, at the same time there is compression, this gives dark energy presure at the center, the trick is to be able to understand that there are two forces, one local and one general, two moviments.... See dark energy is fabric of space, dark energy generates gravity when atoms are bound toguether the density generates a eletromagnectic field at the subatomic level that the dark energy can't pass trough so it stars to work around the object, this happening from the universe and happens in 360° simple cause it resambles a sphere, as consequence the mater it is pushed against and around will become spherical, there is no trick.... now there is a secund force that is moving us into the horizontal and vertical axes, in this case is the super massive black hole at the center of the galaxy,, it is spining the dark energy around biblhons of milles, the hole galaxy, this is giving us local movement.... See without local moviment, the 360° pressure of dark energy coming from universe would colapse us into a big sphere, the local movement is what is forbiding it to happen, you may not acept but galaxyes are spiral, and the planets are traped into the horizontal disk provided by the event horizon, but not a flat spital, the galaxy is a sphere, inside another sphere, the same presure that make us become spherical make the flow of dark energy generated by the SMBH at the center also be traped inside a sphere, simple imagine a gigant event horion where its strong at the center but is geting weaker at the end of the arms.... Now I'm in a hurry, lets go to the elephant on the room, what is a black hole? It is a reverse flow of dark energy, it is a expansion just like he universe, see the flow of dark energy, due the presense of dense atomic structure form planets, planets in this case stars too, as they grow the as consequence get big and the flow of dark energy the push away get too, the universe still appying presure but dark energy cant penetrate trogh only work around, the temperature at the core heats up due the constant presure, the core generate another object inside, a neutron star, but it happens when it is still a planet, now I'm really in a hyrry, so lets be brief latter I correct, the universe keeps expandind, everything, including the atom bounds, this alowed at some point if the object are too disproporsional to the new universe size it stars to loose density as incomparison to the dark energy flow aginst, dark energy become gradually able to get trough, the star expands, the dark energy reaches the core, this reaction triggers a explosion so powerfull that it pushe the cros away, the matter at that moment adquire enought force to push dark energy back, to expand it to its limits, if no matteria falls in this area the space dark energy wave comes back in the right amount it was pushed away, but if the object it finds when it comes back have more mass than the one who caused the expansion, it will apply much more presure on it, a inccorect one, universe sent the wave back plus the force of the expansion itself, and it return to a new mass, it than falls on it, space falls o it and force it to shirnk, but at some point it cannot become less small, at this moment a new flow of dark energy is generated from inside out the shirinked star, it cannot be compresed anymore, the two shockwaves of dark enegy collide at some point and start to spin, but being a spere it can release the energy, it conserves the movement and eventually the two forces became equalized, one pushing agains and anohter pushing bak, the only thing that can disrupt that is a secund black hole, sry hurry... hope I just made myself clear...
heinrichmaster there are electromagnetic vibrations in the space which do not require any medium to travel, there waves are captured by the instruments and converted to sound signals
I wonder why they accurately modeled gravitational-lensin of the distant stars around the black hole and then got rid of it for the accretion disk. The video is inaccurate AND inconsistent.
+chazzatheninja Professor chazzatheninja is in the house everyone and he wears the face of the actor Adam Scott. All bow down to this random man on the internet. Science and NASA were wrong!
yoshi75013 Lol, okay, then go and look up "Black Hole Gravitational Lensing" Or even better, for an idiot like you it might be easier to look up a UA-cam documentary called "Science Behind Interstellar", the movie in which they consulted ACTUAL astrophysicists to model a black hole with accretion disk included.
Kristian Larsson Exactly, dumbass. The extreme gravity of the Black Hole Causes the accretion disk to appear to "fold" upwards at a degree of 90 degrees to it's original position, when viewed from the same plane as the accretion disk or from angles near to that. Look up how they accurately modeled the Black Hole with accretion disk in Interstellar. They consulted leading astrophysicists and created what this Black Hole SHOULD look like.
Oh come on NASA, you guys have known for a year that that's not an accurate depiction of a black hole with an accretion disk. Smh ...Still looks awesome, though.
Just FYI the guy who composed the song is Mark Petrie. You can find the song without going to the killer tracks site by searching 'Mark Petrie - Encompass' :3
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله صباح الخير للجميع افتقدك ناسا تي أنا لست إله وأخشى رب يوم العرق ولست مميت بل جزء من ما خلق سبحان الله ربنا اعجزه القمري قد اتسق أحمر اللون للحب تعبيرا إله نا واحد إليه هيا نستبق أشعار فضائية أيها الكائن الإنسان عد ربك أنت أكرم ما خلق
Absolutely. All videos posted on our channel are public domain. We only ask that you give credit. Also, you can download various resolutions from the svs.gsfc.nasa.gov.... link in the video description above.
What the heck happens at 0:16 ?!! Am I to believe that the remnants of the star turn into a glow fairy? I would like to see the outer layers of the star ripped away and the core exposed. Now that would be interesting.
Hey, science fans. The star seems to flow toward the black hole like fluid, or even what we would recognize as flame. Wouldn't the star collapse, explode, or break apart in some kind of reaction if enough of its matter were drawn from it? Or is that little puff at the end supposed to be the reaction? The black hole's gonna get it, but it seems as though it would draw matter, the star would react, and the black hole would draw the resultant matter.
all a star is is alot of highly packed gas round a core of some sort. the black holes mass is so much greater then the star, and therefore it has a stronger gravitational pull, that it just rips the gas off of the star. to put that in perspective if the black hole were to be the same diameter as the star then it would be from 5-70 times more heavy depending on what the star type is.
Once the star's matter is fully absorbed by the black hole, the accretion disk will disappear and the Black Hole will be invisible, until more matter gets too close again.
I get that it's a time lapsed CG example of what goes down, but the star looks like it just pops like a bubble once it looses most of it's mass. It's kind of visually displeasing lol.
Is it just me or does anyone else wonder why the blue 'tendrils' that appear to be pulsating as everything is spinning around the centre of the object, seem to be curved in the opposite direction that they should be. If this were a wheel you would think the blue bits would be curving back in the direction of spin.
So what happened when the "black hole" changed after the star was "destroyed". Why did the "black hole" have that look? And was that a plasma beam coming from the center? If nothing can escape but radiation, what was around it for so long?
The disk around it has not fallen into the black hole yet, but is spiraling inward. The beam is caused by the final destruction of matter inside the black hole and we're still working on how that happens.
Over what time perioud would the depicted event take place?
The full event lasted about 200 days (6.5 months).
10 years is the latest one they have been watching over a ten year period a black hole consumed a star 7 times the mass of our sun. Spewing some mass out of the black hole as radio waves at speeds close to the speed of light.
Would that mean its not a black hole if the left overs of the star is blown out?
The energy generated is outside the event horizon so can escape.
The infall energy of matter is Einstein E=mc**2 level 100 times more than a simple supernova explosion for the same mass star..
What enters the black hole cannot be observed but around half of the matter and energy is radiated and warped by pressure and fields into the jets and expelled rather than falling below the event horizon.
The energy is so great that for proportion the picture of the swirling disk is more like what we would see through welding goggles filters over a mile/1.6km thick. Not that we or the filter would survive long :-).
I CN BELIEIVE IT. I THINK IF YOU STAND IN FRONT OF ME. I WILL HAVE TO BELIEIVE MY EYES R LYING ON ME. ANR WAYS WISHING YOU GUYS ALL THE SUCCESS N WISHES N BLESSINGS.
this is why i am staying alive, fighting my depression and anxiety. nature, space and time is so fun to look at and learn about. This universe is truly unique
Mrcheekymonkey1996 yeah me too, I have depression and anxiety but we need to be alive,there's so many things we need to know before we die.
Mrcheekymonkey1996 brother the only cure is in the rememberance of Allah subhanahu wa teala, if you know that every created thing needs a mind:knowledge and cant come into existence from nothing you may find the straight path inshaAllah
Renzo Saayo brother i can only recommend you to learn about islam and i cant do more, please read holy qur'an
Ali Ünal could you tell me which is the most accurate english translation of Quran?
Try to think outside of the box. This is what they serve to people like you. Truth is bigger than "black holes". :)
Music credit: Encompass by Mark Petrie from Killer Tracks.
How to build an atmospheric black hole >>>>>
But in space, no one can hear you music.
60 fps makes videos so much more enjoyable. Thanks, NASA, for making at least *some* of your videos in 60 fps.
0:13 mr black hole, i dont feel so good...
alright alright alright, tars you ready?
Interstellar HEHE, this little maneuver will cost us 51 years
i just watched interstellar yesterday loved if
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅌㅋㅋㅌㅌㅌㅌㅌ
Always😁
now where is my Mass Effect save files.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! :D
>:D
BEST GAME EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
better than Half-Life 2 or Fallout 3?
I would rather see the data and visual evidence from the satellites then an artist rendering don't hog all the evidence let us have a look.
This is like showing us a painting of an event and saying see i told you it was true .
+Travis polson me too!... i guess we are just nerds :P
+Travis polson Right, because we totally have imaging satellites orbiting the nearest convenient black hole just in time to watch a star get eaten.
+Travis polson I would like data with the graphics. Just some text on the sides telling us what's going on is all we would need.
+Travis polson The make of this video is to illustrate the new finding of how the Black Hole shreds passing Star. It is just to make lines of texts from theory into a thing easier to understand. Off course, who knows, it might be wrong, but this is all we know about it. For the visual evidence, the process of activities from the very-large scale object like this take time - long long time. Our satellites cannot capture all of them. We can just observe a little piece of the entire process, we might have only the steps that the Black Hole already ate the star, but what was happened before that? We don't know, so we need the theory to find that what's going on there(possible to be), what's next and the rendering process can show us how it actually works from the context of its theory -- something like making a movie from a book.
+Travis polson I agree, but the point of this is not to show you exactly how it happens since we can't see yet, it's to show you that with the data we've got, it's an accurate depiction of how we think it'd happen, which can lead to greater understanding. Kip Thorne did a shit ton of work on the movie Interstellar to make an accurate visual of a black hole, and the work he did on it was the basis of many papers that furthered our understanding. This video may not be accurate. But so far as we know, we think it is. Ya dig?
People calling this video out as being animated. Nice job. I picture you trying to push a triangle block through a circle hole and wondering why it doesn't fit.
people who say this is fake, you should know that this video is an artist rendition Based on data that we already have. yes, the video is fake, but what it shows is what would happen based on the information we have.
there is no possible way to observe a black hole shredding a star up close. the universe is a big place, light it self takes 4 years just to reach the nearest star to our own.
kenneth latorre Lol what data?? Please link me to some data.
News Now Colorado judging from your moronic comment I doubt you could make any use of such data
There is no gravitational lensing effect...
@@EpixBawokLoL yeah there is, look at the beginning
I agree
Great CGI work! When I see animations like this showing a black hole moving across space and distorting the light of stars, it looks similar to the refraction you'd get with that of a glass lens. Maybe black holes are actually not black, but more like a transparent sphere distorting the light.
"Black" only means that they don't emit radiation - though the accretion disk around them certainly does.
Finally someone who said it !
Song can be found here:
www.mediafire.com/listen/4l0ej0h8gx00tpl/NYB_114_12_Encompass_Petrie_879586.mp3
Found it in the comments, needed to share it.
Thanx)
+Hoch134 THANKS!!
+Hoch134 Good news)))
+Hoch134 Спасибо!
+Hoch134 Thank you!!!
You can tell it is fake because you cannot hear music in space.
+David John that's hilarious!!!
Monster LMA But radio waves are electromagnetic waves.
+David John thats why it can travel
It looks fake asf
hey that music is edited dummy ;-; XD
who knew a black whole swallowing a passing star would look so beautiful?
I don't care if this is an animation, it's beautiful
I agree
Conveniently getting rid of all the gravitational lensing after the accretion disc forms
this is an artists impression, so it would look better
At 0:17 it shows that the core of the star dissipates around into space while the black hole strips and sucks in the lighter outside layers with ease. Stars have heaviest elements created by fusion, and than deposited in their center, (just like iron oxide falls off to the ocean floor). Why would the heavy star's core puff away like that...as if it was made up of lightweight elements... I think this computed simulation is wrong or not complete, any ideas?
Just take a second to think of how much that looks like an iris... Impressive
Looked like a galaxy 🌌 was being formed, space and nature are just amazing
Is there any documented footage of a black hole where we can see what’s in front and behind it? (As if we were looking at the black hole at an angle, instead of straight on)
Thanks!
I'm no astrophysicist but... once the disk forms, shouldn't gravitational lensing make it look a bit more bizarre? like the one in the movie interstellar?
That's something i'd want to see as my desktop background. so cool.
This is animation. Dont have images?
No, we don't have the capability to image black holes at this point in human history.
Thank you!
did nasa not picture a plasma ejection from a black hole that proves black holes.
@@NASAGoddard that aged well
@@deviantsemicolon618 Haha yeah
I'll say this once again, the neutron star exists inside any planet that has a eletromagnetic field, some planets are just spheres with no functions, universe give to his planets his own spherical shape, this simple happens becase two dimmensions with opposit charges are coliding at the border, transposing one another much like two circles passing one for the other, in the middle as long as they are transponding a third little eliptic form stars to form, still having flat surfaces and inside this new dimmension two forces are being applyed from the food, the food at the borders are shoking dark matter or anti-mater with probably matter, the result is dark energy, dark matter can be simple dark matter heated up by radiation, and dark energy could simple be dark matter in its cold state, the thing is as long as the two dimmensions keeps transponding one another, this trird new dimmension at the middle starts to became more spheric and the flow of dark energy getting weaker.... see there are two forces compression and expansion, as long as the two dimmensions keeps transponding one the other, the expansion make the third dimmension expand itself and with this the density of dark energy inside of it get thin, at the same time there is compression, this gives dark energy presure at the center, the trick is to be able to understand that there are two forces, one local and one general, two moviments.... See dark energy is fabric of space, dark energy generates gravity when atoms are bound toguether the density generates a eletromagnectic field at the subatomic level that the dark energy can't pass trough so it stars to work around the object, this happening from the universe and happens in 360° simple cause it resambles a sphere, as consequence the mater it is pushed against and around will become spherical, there is no trick.... now there is a secund force that is moving us into the horizontal and vertical axes, in this case is the super massive black hole at the center of the galaxy,, it is spining the dark energy around biblhons of milles, the hole galaxy, this is giving us local movement.... See without local moviment, the 360° pressure of dark energy coming from universe would colapse us into a big sphere, the local movement is what is forbiding it to happen, you may not acept but galaxyes are spiral, and the planets are traped into the horizontal disk provided by the event horizon, but not a flat spital, the galaxy is a sphere, inside another sphere, the same presure that make us become spherical make the flow of dark energy generated by the SMBH at the center also be traped inside a sphere, simple imagine a gigant event horion where its strong at the center but is geting weaker at the end of the arms.... Now I'm in a hurry, lets go to the elephant on the room, what is a black hole? It is a reverse flow of dark energy, it is a expansion just like he universe, see the flow of dark energy, due the presense of dense atomic structure form planets, planets in this case stars too, as they grow the as consequence get big and the flow of dark energy the push away get too, the universe still appying presure but dark energy cant penetrate trogh only work around, the temperature at the core heats up due the constant presure, the core generate another object inside, a neutron star, but it happens when it is still a planet, now I'm really in a hyrry, so lets be brief latter I correct, the universe keeps expandind, everything, including the atom bounds, this alowed at some point if the object are too disproporsional to the new universe size it stars to loose density as incomparison to the dark energy flow aginst, dark energy become gradually able to get trough, the star expands, the dark energy reaches the core, this reaction triggers a explosion so powerfull that it pushe the cros away, the matter at that moment adquire enought force to push dark energy back, to expand it to its limits, if no matteria falls in this area the space dark energy wave comes back in the right amount it was pushed away, but if the object it finds when it comes back have more mass than the one who caused the expansion, it will apply much more presure on it, a inccorect one, universe sent the wave back plus the force of the expansion itself, and it return to a new mass, it than falls on it, space falls o it and force it to shirnk, but at some point it cannot become less small, at this moment a new flow of dark energy is generated from inside out the shirinked star, it cannot be compresed anymore, the two shockwaves of dark enegy collide at some point and start to spin, but being a spere it can release the energy, it conserves the movement and eventually the two forces became equalized, one pushing agains and anohter pushing bak, the only thing that can disrupt that is a secund black hole, sry hurry... hope I just made myself clear...
But how could you hear the music in the vacuum of space?
heinrichmaster ummmmmm........i dont know. probably they removed it
heinrichmaster there are electromagnetic vibrations in the space which do not require any medium to travel, there waves are captured by the instruments and converted to sound signals
We love you NASA, keep it up!
I wonder why they accurately modeled gravitational-lensin of the distant stars around the black hole and then got rid of it for the accretion disk.
The video is inaccurate AND inconsistent.
+chazzatheninja Professor chazzatheninja is in the house everyone and he wears the face of the actor Adam Scott. All bow down to this random man on the internet. Science and NASA were wrong!
+chazzatheninja I have the choice to believe NASA or you, unknown voice of the internet. Guess who's my choice.
+chazzatheninja The accretion disk doesn't have the density of a black hole
yoshi75013 Lol, okay, then go and look up "Black Hole Gravitational Lensing"
Or even better, for an idiot like you it might be easier to look up a UA-cam documentary called "Science Behind Interstellar", the movie in which they consulted ACTUAL astrophysicists to model a black hole with accretion disk included.
Kristian Larsson Exactly, dumbass.
The extreme gravity of the Black Hole Causes the accretion disk to appear to "fold" upwards at a degree of 90 degrees to it's original position, when viewed from the same plane as the accretion disk or from angles near to that.
Look up how they accurately modeled the Black Hole with accretion disk in Interstellar.
They consulted leading astrophysicists and created what this Black Hole SHOULD look like.
Oh come on NASA, you guys have known for a year that that's not an accurate depiction of a black hole with an accretion disk. Smh
...Still looks awesome, though.
name of the music theme?
Wonderful rendering based on scientific facts
Hey, what is this MUSIC, please?
To anyone wondering, the piece of music used is "Encompass - Mark Petrie".
I don't know if we can prosper with such people whose comments show pure ignorance.
I'm glad at least one person gets it
I know youse gots to, but thanks for releasing this in the public domain.
Whats the song name?
Darude - Sandstorm
+Xeter R3 boku no pico
Darude - Sandstorm
+Xeter R3 www.mediafire.com/listen/4l0ej0h8gx00tpl/NYB_114_12_Encompass_Petrie_879586.mp3
Out of the comments
+Hoch134 Молодец! RESPECT
woah this is insane!
Dear NASA, can you tell us the song name? PLEASE!!!
+Touldie vel BeTe Maybe Darude - Sandstorm
+Edgardo Ortega Yacante Absolutely not. This is not Sandstorm. If even it is I can't find that version what NASA used.
+Touldie vel BeTe LMFAO
+Touldie vel BeTe hahaha you dipweed
+Touldie vel BeTe The song is "Encompass" from the stock music site Killer Tracks.
Just FYI the guy who composed the song is Mark Petrie. You can find the song without going to the killer tracks site by searching 'Mark Petrie - Encompass' :3
Wouaouuuuh :))
I can give it a human
I saw this happen with my own eyes. A lemon passed by my girlfriend's bunghole and it got shredded.
I was hoping to watch the actual thing and not a simulation video. I am kind of dissapointed.
+reco45rs I don't think you understand how impossibly hard it would be to actually film this.
+Mr Sparkles lol if it infact was a video, the video would be thousands if not millions of years long.
This wasn’t even real footage, it was CGI. What’s the point of videos like this when they’re not showing us direct feed?
pretty sure that this was a real event. we just could not picture it, we could only use radio waves to find out what it is.
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله صباح الخير للجميع افتقدك ناسا تي
أنا لست إله وأخشى رب يوم العرق
ولست مميت بل جزء من ما خلق
سبحان الله ربنا اعجزه القمري قد اتسق
أحمر اللون للحب تعبيرا
إله نا واحد إليه هيا نستبق
أشعار فضائية أيها الكائن الإنسان عد ربك أنت أكرم ما خلق
Впечатляет! И страшит одновременно!
it´s so beautiful ... , but at the same time is scary ...
That's some amazing Nextlimit Realflow animation there :D
congradulations, great video !!!
basically when you studied so hard but forget everything
Why 60 FPS? Use 24 FPS for cinematic experience.
+CriminalGameplay go back to 2005...
because it's a video designed to show visual detail, not a cinematic film. 60fps is correct.
what is on the other side of a black hole? That is what I keep wondering about
Awesome! Please release it in actual 4k rather than the 'Jupiter 4k' which looked like PlayStation 1 graphics.
So glad I just watched this!
Looks good enought for a new TV HD commercial
saw 10 seconds of the video then the channel's name, subbed inmediatluuuu
It amazes me that they can observe phenomena occurring 100,000,000's of light years away.
I remember this time flies real quick
Can I use this video in one of my videos on UA-cam?
Absolutely. All videos posted on our channel are public domain. We only ask that you give credit.
Also, you can download various resolutions from the svs.gsfc.nasa.gov.... link in the video description above.
that looks like a straight up galaxy
♫ Black hole sun
Won't you come
And wash away the rain
Black hole sun
Won't you come
Won't you come (won't you come) ..... ♫
Mikeg1 .1 doesn't rhyme doesn't makes sense .
That was an old Soundgarden song.
60 frames per second, awesome!
What the heck happens at 0:16 ?!! Am I to believe that the remnants of the star turn into a glow fairy? I would like to see the outer layers of the star ripped away and the core exposed. Now that would be interesting.
It feels you're in a galaxy
Very good,Enigma
Shoulda called themselves Nastrophysics instead of Nasa Astrophysics tbh...
[Music]
[Beeping]
i read these as [Music intensifies] and [Beeping intensifies]
so satisfying!
NASA!!! FOR GOD SAKE WE WANT THE SONG!!!
Nasa has made some special discoveries.
could you make more videos like this please
Yeah it would help uh give a very high trip🤣
Why on 0:25 the Black hole looks like a Disk? A Black Hole is however a Sphere .
What amount of time would have passed in this render? Are we talking years? Centuries? Millions of years?
An artist's rendering. Big deal. I expect more from NASA.
What is the purpose of an artist's rendering of a purported space event?
So that people are able to have something that helps them visualise it.
+Deus Ex (Machina) You don't believe in black holes?
+Margaret Flynn what you just saw would normally take 10s if not hundreds of years. They just showed it faster with simulation tech.
+Allen Wrench There are people out there who believe porn movies are real?!
+180Ranmafan Thank you for the information. I understand!
...besides, it makes pretty pictures, and they are a lot more fun to watch, then a lot of other stuff.
Oh I don't want to see a rendering, I want to see the real footage, come on!
I wish we could start to show and model 3d versions of how black holes and gravity affects space rather than 2d. We are in the 21st century you know
What a pretty cartoon for the children!
Scientists are still scratching their heads over the great cosmic belch which occurred after this star's consumption.
so i bet this took NASA 8 months to render this out
Where are we now?
i really hope they get a real black hole on tape
does it mean even a bulletproof suit wouldn't help me to survive the encounter?
Nothing can. Once you get too close, there's no going back.
you will get turned into a string of your atoms. a polymer basically. this is appropriately name spaghettification
Cat’s Eye Nebula: exists
Human Eye Nebula: 0:19
is this an animation or are these like real photos taken?
It's an animation as it says in the text.
Hey, science fans. The star seems to flow toward the black hole like fluid, or even what we would recognize as flame. Wouldn't the star collapse, explode, or break apart in some kind of reaction if enough of its matter were drawn from it? Or is that little puff at the end supposed to be the reaction? The black hole's gonna get it, but it seems as though it would draw matter, the star would react, and the black hole would draw the resultant matter.
all a star is is alot of highly packed gas round a core of some sort. the black holes mass is so much greater then the star, and therefore it has a stronger gravitational pull, that it just rips the gas off of the star.
to put that in perspective if the black hole were to be the same diameter as the star then it would be from 5-70 times more heavy depending on what the star type is.
Once the star's matter is fully absorbed by the black hole, the accretion disk will disappear and the Black Hole will be invisible, until more matter gets too close again.
FUN FACT: this happened over 250 million years ago. Isn't that crazy?
This is so good
That's not how a black hole forms it forms from a sun explosion with tons of mass.
what is that line "above and bellow" black holes? how how it forms?
+Irun Mon Relativistic jet en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysical_jet#Relativistic_jet
+Irun Mon hawking radiation
Ive always asked that question. They put it many times u black hole, galaxies and other space-animations.
Nice timelapse..
Hollywood does better cgi.
Интересно, по какому принципу разрушаются чёрные дыры.
looks the same as my toilet gets flushed
whats the background melody to this?
I had too watch this about 5 times too see how the star even did that and how this even happened
I get that it's a time lapsed CG example of what goes down, but the star looks like it just pops like a bubble once it looses most of it's mass. It's kind of visually displeasing lol.
yeah. if you want more displeasing they search up the sound of two black hole colliding.
Is it just me or does anyone else wonder why the blue 'tendrils' that appear to be pulsating as everything is spinning around the centre of the object, seem to be curved in the opposite direction that they should be. If this were a wheel you would think the blue bits would be curving back in the direction of spin.
So what happened when the "black hole" changed after the star was "destroyed". Why did the "black hole" have that look? And was that a plasma beam coming from the center? If nothing can escape but radiation, what was around it for so long?
The disk around it has not fallen into the black hole yet, but is spiraling inward. The beam is caused by the final destruction of matter inside the black hole and we're still working on how that happens.
Is this made in like real time, or is the event sort of like fast forward?
It is fast forward (yeah I'm replying 5 years later lol)