1995 | In the Company of Animals conference, Keynote Address by Stephen Jay Gould | The New School

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 жов 2011
  • Center for Public Scholarship | www.newschool.edu/cps
    1995 - In the Company of Animals - Keynote: Stephen Jay Gould | The New School
    April 6-8, 1995:
    The 4th conference in the Social Research Conference series, In the Company of Animals examined our relationship with other animals over time and in different cultures through a public conference at the New School, a poetry reading organized by the American Academy of Poets, and exhibits and other public programs at the Pierpont Morgan Library, The Asia Society, The Museum of African Art, and the Jewish Museum.
    Stephen Jay Gould (September 10, 1941 -- May 20, 2002) was the Alexander Agassiz Professor of Zoology at Harvard University and the Keynote speaker and author for the conference.
    This conference was made possible by generous support from The Howard Gilman Foundation, The National Endowment for the Humanities, The Esther and Joseph Klingenstein Foundation, and, finally, Ms. Caroline Williams.
    The conference proceedings are available in a special issue of Social Research, Vol. 62 No. 3 (Fall 1995). You may also join our event mailing list by contacting us at cps@newschool.edu.
    SOCIAL RESEARCH: AN INTERNATIONAL QUARTERLY | www.newschool.edu/cps/social-r...
    THE NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH | www.newschool.edu/nssr
    THE NEW SCHOOL | www.newschool.edu

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @Mchavez916
    @Mchavez916 8 років тому +17

    Gould starts at 7:15

  • @theHindenberg
    @theHindenberg 6 років тому +2

    We need this man's intellect today.

  • @mieliav
    @mieliav 10 років тому +6

    gould's books are such exciting reads.

    • @TipoQueTocaelPiano
      @TipoQueTocaelPiano 7 років тому

      Which one would you recommend?

    • @mieliav
      @mieliav 7 років тому

      most of them are collections of essays, so one doesn't have to read from front to back. 'Wonderful Life' is a longer work on one subject. start w/ any essay and see where you go!

    • @USERNAMEfieldempty
      @USERNAMEfieldempty 7 років тому +1

      Any of them. They're all intense and broad and ultimately humbling. The guy's brain fills your head with such an avalanche of ideas that it makes you realise what your own brain is capable of.

    • @cesaralvarado775
      @cesaralvarado775 7 років тому +3

      There are a few online you can read here:
      www.stephenjaygould.org/books/modern.html

  • @bluethursday
    @bluethursday 10 років тому +2

    i LOVE this man

  • @tarnopol
    @tarnopol 12 років тому +2

    Gould starts at 7:15.

  • @amaxamon
    @amaxamon 8 років тому +3

    I love all the pens lol just in case he needs to write an essay on stage?? ;)

    • @kb5214
      @kb5214 6 років тому

      amaxamon awesome comment!

  • @johndoe9207
    @johndoe9207 2 роки тому

    2021

  • @cafinario
    @cafinario 2 роки тому

    I did not quite get why he always spoke while laughing at the same time.

  • @whatabouttheearth
    @whatabouttheearth Рік тому

    Right, but "higher boney fishes", even that language is ascension based. It's so embedded in more than just language.
    And it not only relates to anthropocentric mindsets but a religious mindset of ascension, going to heaven, this has of course been conditioned by thousands of years of certain unfounded anthropocentric/religious perceptions and indoctrination.

  • @pashute12
    @pashute12 2 роки тому

    [17:51] ...a believer I'm not, I'm a good New York Jew

  • @bon12121
    @bon12121 Рік тому

    22:11 interesting, why is it nonsense?

    • @christopherhamilton3621
      @christopherhamilton3621 7 місяців тому

      Because it’s firstly anthropomorphising and secondly a circular argument.

  • @emadbagheri
    @emadbagheri 2 роки тому

    lol fraud!

    • @whatabouttheearth
      @whatabouttheearth Рік тому +2

      A truly erudite and nuanced response.

    • @Raydensheraj
      @Raydensheraj Рік тому +1

      Why fraud?

    • @bon12121
      @bon12121 Рік тому

      agreed, why fraud?

    • @emadbagheri
      @emadbagheri Рік тому +1

      @@bon12121 the phrase used by his colleagues (in public writing) to describe him "...many of us Theoretical Biologist who knew SJG personally thought he was something of an intellectual fraud ..." ( Robert Trivera PHD), that's from his friends but you should read his critics!

    • @bon12121
      @bon12121 Рік тому

      @@emadbagheri sheesh, that was a friend?!