It's a tough choice, either of the two will be amazing. I kind of hope the Redback wins, not least because I think closer ties with KR and JP are important to us with the Pacific theater heating up again. I need to get one of those Redback shirts though...
This looks better than the over grown shoulders of the Lynx. This looks more professional and the proportions are right as well. Hope it can compete in the competition for the next gen Bradley in the US once it scores the win in this competition. That would be a game changer not just for South Korea but also Australia as it will have a piece in the production and subsequent enhancements for future iterations.
Very good argument for the Hanwha Redback. Impressed with the removal of torsion bars to create room and the floating floor concept, and also the ability to pick and choose the best-in-class subsystems from around the world. Put the new U.S. XM193 50mm autocannon on it!
The longer the announcement is delayed, the more I’m thinking Hanwah are the winner. Need a solid vehicle not some Prima Dona money pit. Good luck team.
Really hoping Australia pick the Redback closer ties with ROK will allow interoperability when it kicks off in the pacific theatre, plus I think it will be the better vehicle for future growth and export options! And the family of vehicles the chassis is able to be made not just an IFV version it will be cheaper with its modular design, its 🤘🏽
Seems like a good choice from platform/performance...but what happens when we are at war with China, and parts can't arrive from Korea? Or is it all manufactured in Australia?
Because, if you have an IFV and don't need, it, you have a vehicle you don't need. But if you don't have an IFV, and suddenly you do need it, your screwed. Besides, Australia operates mechanised brigades, which requires mechanisation. Not having IFVs with Australias Army structure is like the air force not having planes.
IED defense is an important requirement of the Australian IFV tender, so I'm guessing the possibility to send this to where the U.S. fights is a big requirement?
Considering they have released very little information about the trials I would be interested to know where you are getting this from or is this just your opinion.
In terms of the Lynx the transmission is drawn from the Puma, the engine is commonly used in construction and the NBC is the same as the Boxer. The turret is exactly the same as the Boxer and Rheinmetall and NIOA in QLD have partnered through building a Rheinmetall munitions factory in QLD which will produce all Rheinmetall munitions locally. The lynx also has scalable armour from 2 to 6 with add ons as well as active and passive enhancements. Further the vehicle has a top speed of 75km/h compared to the Redback at around 60km/h. In addition the redback is approximately 41tn while the lynx is scalable from 25tn to 51tn depending on the arrangement. Finally, while yes the lynx currently in trials as traditional steel tracks, the lynx also comes with rubber tracks.
If you buy the Redback you need to buy every vehicle new SCE, which will cost millions for years to come. As well, the lynx has the integrated hull that supports cross platforming between it and the boxer, which we already own.
Did anybody win or has the AUKUS sub deal sucked all the resources out of everything else? The Redback looks great and with Poland's megadeal with the Koreans that's the way to go.
Redback was selected however initial order size was reduced from 400 to ~140, with the funds instead going into strengthening and expanding our long range ground strike and air defence units in army. More HIMARS systems, more SAM systems and development.
I consider a system with perhaps 4 of these in conjunction with a gepard system with the same range an as these as back up because they are developing drones to take them out
I am sorry that you guys lost land 400 phase 3. An Australian Army soldier told me today the lynx won. I am upset as I still believe AS21 Redback IFV is the best as did the fella I spoke too agreed saying the hull suspension and room in the back are better. I am disappointed with our government and think they wasted Hanwha's time. What a waste, including AS9 and as10 Huntsman SPG not worth setting up for 30 and 15 vehicles. Us engineers know the Redback is better.
Australia should just get the K21, its lighter and amphibious, better suited to the jungle and archipelagic environment in the Indo-Pacific. While also providing all the protection and firepower that's needed.
That's a smart and informed observation Mike. However, after 20 years running anti-terrorist shotgun for the US Australia seems obsessed with IED protection... 🤷♂️
@@edwardkim8972 There is also the K21-105 light tank which would often be a better alternative to the 70ton Abrams in those areas with poor roads and bridges, less likely to get stuck and easier to recover if they do. Also a C17 with a load capacity of 80 tons could carry 2 K21s that way less than 30tons whereas the Redback weighs 42 tons.
@@edwardkim8972 IED’s are pain in the ass. Even the great CV90 lost many soldiers due to IED. I think it’s a must now, we just have to watch the war in Ukraine to see how every army/terrorist/etc will use them to slow, kill and injure infantry.
@@edwardkim8972 Hanwa Defence could be the army's most important contractor. We're already getting their K9 Thunders, they're also developing the Korean Amphibious assault vehicle 2. The ADF have said that they are looking for a new AAV to replace our LARC-Vs and LCM 8s the KAAV 2 seems like the best option.
Redback should have won, sad we will have German rather than Australian South Korean Israeli. I'm not happy with 2nd best. The soldier told me Redback had more room, better suspension and better 30mm. They were biast from the start
It would make sense to get the Redback when you consider that we have already decided to buy the K9 self propelled howitzers from South Korea….
It's a tough choice, either of the two will be amazing. I kind of hope the Redback wins, not least because I think closer ties with KR and JP are important to us with the Pacific theater heating up again. I need to get one of those Redback shirts though...
This red back is amazing, it’s about time the Albanese Govt makes a decision and purchases the full tender amount and start getting them into service
This looks better than the over grown shoulders of the Lynx. This looks more professional and the proportions are right as well.
Hope it can compete in the competition for the next gen Bradley in the US once it scores the win in this competition. That would be a game changer not just for South Korea but also Australia as it will have a piece in the production and subsequent enhancements for future iterations.
Agreed.
IMO this is the best choice for OMFV. Especially compared to BAE’s warmed over Bradley proposal.
agreed from South Korea 😊
Hopefully the rumors are true! Go Hanwha Team Redback 👏
Selection of Redback will also permit Australia to ,with Hanwa, enter the global market of IFVs
Good luck Hanwha! Your IFV looks awesome.
Very good argument for the Hanwha Redback. Impressed with the removal of torsion bars to create room and the floating floor concept, and also the ability to pick and choose the best-in-class subsystems from around the world. Put the new U.S. XM193 50mm autocannon on it!
Hydropneumatic suspension is very mature technology.
The longer the announcement is delayed, the more I’m thinking Hanwah are the winner. Need a solid vehicle not some Prima Dona money pit. Good luck team.
If Australia was smart they’d pick this one
They just did 🤟🏼
Australia normally isnt
Congratulations to the Hanwha Defense Australia team for winning the IFV procurement contract
I don't know if "coolness" is a prerequisite for the land 400 program. But if it is, Redback wins it. Hands down.
Really hoping Australia pick the Redback closer ties with ROK will allow interoperability when it kicks off in the pacific theatre, plus I think it will be the better vehicle for future growth and export options! And the family of vehicles the chassis is able to be made not just an IFV version it will be cheaper with its modular design, its 🤘🏽
Great to see Australian manufacturing being given such a high priority
Great Video and great machine. Hope having enough of them would prevent us from ever needing to use them for their intended purpose.
Is it because I'm Korean? I think Redback is a little stronger, right?
The redback looks amazing!
Question: is amphibious?
Greetings from Paraguay 🇵🇾
Very nice!
Seems like a good choice from platform/performance...but what happens when we are at war with China, and parts can't arrive from Korea? Or is it all manufactured in Australia?
Hanhwa has manufacturing plants in Australia …
Powerful and beautiful IFV but why do Australia need IFV in first place? Is Australia expecting 1 in a million chance of mainland invasion?
Because, if you have an IFV and don't need, it, you have a vehicle you don't need. But if you don't have an IFV, and suddenly you do need it, your screwed. Besides, Australia operates mechanised brigades, which requires mechanisation. Not having IFVs with Australias Army structure is like the air force not having planes.
Uh, but your existing IFV is from the Vietnam War era. If you're not going to replace those then when?
IED defense is an important requirement of the Australian IFV tender, so I'm guessing the possibility to send this to where the U.S. fights is a big requirement?
hindsight would be a marvellous thing?
If Australia is smart they should buy both units
I thought it was a no brainer, the redback is built on a tried and proven chasis the lynx is new and must still have bugs to iron out.
The Lynx is based off the Puma so it is not entirely new and has parts interchangeable with the Boxer and Leopard.
Considering they have released very little information about the trials I would be interested to know where you are getting this from or is this just your opinion.
In terms of the Lynx the transmission is drawn from the Puma, the engine is commonly used in construction and the NBC is the same as the Boxer. The turret is exactly the same as the Boxer and Rheinmetall and NIOA in QLD have partnered through building a Rheinmetall munitions factory in QLD which will produce all Rheinmetall munitions locally. The lynx also has scalable armour from 2 to 6 with add ons as well as active and passive enhancements. Further the vehicle has a top speed of 75km/h compared to the Redback at around 60km/h. In addition the redback is approximately 41tn while the lynx is scalable from 25tn to 51tn depending on the arrangement. Finally, while yes the lynx currently in trials as traditional steel tracks, the lynx also comes with rubber tracks.
@@thomaswheeler7767 it's not just his opinion. There has been some leaked information on the rma that flavours the redback.
If you buy the Redback you need to buy every vehicle new SCE, which will cost millions for years to come. As well, the lynx has the integrated hull that supports cross platforming between it and the boxer, which we already own.
Did anybody win or has the AUKUS sub deal sucked all the resources out of everything else? The Redback looks great and with Poland's megadeal with the Koreans that's the way to go.
Redback was selected however initial order size was reduced from 400 to ~140, with the funds instead going into strengthening and expanding our long range ground strike and air defence units in army. More HIMARS systems, more SAM systems and development.
Please pick this one please
For your stocks?
@@김우성-h8u nar mate just because south Korea has come along Way and it's looks like a beautiful hard hit vehicle
It has been delayed 2022 , maybe the nuke subs have wrecked this land 400/3 the number of units is down from 450 -less than 300.
Apakah sudah di tawarkan kepada INDONESIAN ARMY...???
Great news for Australia the Redback wins
7:15 so is this mean even KF41 decided to use composite rubber track, the result advantage us minimal? Ha
Australia made the right choice selecting the Redback
한화디펜스, 화이팅~~~!
With drone warfare it's challenging the existence of such things ,
I consider a system with perhaps 4 of these in conjunction with a gepard system with the same range an as these as back up because they are developing drones to take them out
We can substitute gepard are useful from the Ukraine battle,those gepard are defensively necessary with missiles an drones
I am sorry that you guys lost land 400 phase 3. An Australian Army soldier told me today the lynx won. I am upset as I still believe AS21 Redback IFV is the best as did the fella I spoke too agreed saying the hull suspension and room in the back are better. I am disappointed with our government and think they wasted Hanwha's time. What a waste, including AS9 and as10 Huntsman SPG not worth setting up for 30 and 15 vehicles. Us engineers know the Redback is better.
No announcement has been made yet so the soldier has been telling you some lies!
Breaking Defense interviewed seven Australian military experts at LAND FORCES 2022 and they all said that the Redback won.
Looks like they stuck a turret on an M113! LOL
HOW MUCH COST in $ millions an a $500 rocket can take it out make crazy men
Australia should just get the K21, its lighter and amphibious, better suited to the jungle and archipelagic environment in the Indo-Pacific. While also providing all the protection and firepower that's needed.
That's a smart and informed observation Mike. However, after 20 years running anti-terrorist shotgun for the US Australia seems obsessed with IED protection... 🤷♂️
@@edwardkim8972 There is also the K21-105 light tank which would often be a better alternative to the 70ton Abrams in those areas with poor roads and bridges, less likely to get stuck and easier to recover if they do.
Also a C17 with a load capacity of 80 tons could carry 2 K21s that way less than 30tons whereas the Redback weighs 42 tons.
@@mike-hunt3527 agreed, but Australia ain't gonna get a 20 ton APC anytime soon, despite the logistical advantages.
@@edwardkim8972 IED’s are pain in the ass. Even the great CV90 lost many soldiers due to IED. I think it’s a must now, we just have to watch the war in Ukraine to see how every army/terrorist/etc will use them to slow, kill and injure infantry.
@@edwardkim8972 Hanwa Defence could be the army's most important contractor. We're already getting their K9 Thunders, they're also developing the Korean Amphibious assault vehicle 2.
The ADF have said that they are looking for a new AAV to replace our LARC-Vs and LCM 8s the KAAV 2 seems like the best option.
Redback should have won, sad we will have German rather than Australian South Korean Israeli. I'm not happy with 2nd best. The soldier told me Redback had more room, better suspension and better 30mm. They were biast from the start
Breaking Defense interviewed seven Australian military experts at LAND FORCES 2022 and they all said that the Redback won.
ใช้ความโกรธของเราไปทำผลงานให้ดีในสนามรบ
Manned turret in 2022.
lol
It looks like a copy of the CV90.
Awesome video, well done 👏
lol the first two white guys are basically translators
8:23 that shake of the gun lol.....garbage