The Silent Strategy: How Romans Mastered the Art of War | History Hack

In this captivating video, we delve into the intriguing practice of silent warfare in ancient Rome. Have you ever wondered why the mighty Roman legions chose to fight in silence? Join us as we uncover the shocking truth behind this unusual battle tactic.
We will explore the psychological strategies employed by Roman commanders, the importance of discipline and communication during combat, and how silence played a crucial role in maintaining the element of surprise against their enemies. From the formation of the legions to the whispers of strategy, discover how this method not only changed the course of battles but also shaped the future of warfare.
Whether you're a history enthusiast or simply curious about the tactics of ancient Rome, this video will provide you with fascinating insights and a deeper understanding of the Roman military mindset. Don't miss out on learning about the reasons behind their silent approach and the impact it had on their legendary success.
Watch now to unravel the secrets of Roman warfare, and be prepared to be amazed by the shocking truths that lie behind the silence!
#history #historyhack #ancienthistory #warfare #romanempire
Useful Tags:
wwe raw,wrestling news,wwe news, roman reign return,history,Roman Empire,historical analysis,archaeology,ancient Rome,cultural history,ancient civilizations,Romans,Roman history,war tactics,military history,secrets of Rome,historical facts,ancient warfare,military strategy,gladiators,battle techniques,silent battles,Roman soldiers,legions

[@AWARHERO]

The dog that barks doesn't bite....

[@History_ack]

Maybe so!

[@John-d7p]

They were quiet when required to be quiet, and noisy when required to be noisy. Signifers were used (men who used loud bugle type horns) to signal the centurions - the captains leutenants and sargeants - while higher commanders were signalled by flags, and there were aids who watched those flags like hawks to relay the orders instantly. The Signifers stood close by the commanders for orders, but where also spread down the line to relay quickly.
There were horn blasts to signal "silence: attention to orders" and signals to raise the war cry and to beat on the shields the cadence of advance. Signifers would advance directly behind the line
The Romans did not use drums like other armies because they knew that those sounds could be misunderstood as the sounds of battle. Horns cannot be mistaken.
The use of a whistle by centurions is not confirmed, but is plausible.

[@MikeNoyb]

It's a given, in a battlefield from ancient times to Vietnam to Korea to Afghanistan, the more they scream and yell the more scared they are. If you're a professional, you've already won the battle.
That's one reason why the Kings Guard at Buckingham palace is somber, unmoving and un spoken. It sends volumes of warning to onlookers "Do not Phuket with us".

[@MadMatTom7769]

Ah yes, royal guards... what a pointless job

[@guymundane3807]

@@MadMatTom7769captain hates cool looking things over here

[@PH-VG]

compare it to new Zealands Haka

[@harrygreb75]

In Caesars commentaries he describes his soldiers as loud on the battle field

[@History_ack]

That's a great point! Yes, Caesar's commentaries do mention the loud war cries and shouts of his soldiers on the battlefield, which was a common tactic to intimidate enemies and boost morale.