Maybe your boy shouldn't have set those fires yeah the truth is out there. Can't produce lightning strikes without clouds in Canada kinda hard. Now drones can be traced especially when people are stupid enough to leave the GPS on 😮
The scary part is we had the science in the 80's. If CO2 continues to climb so will the temperature. Greed ignored the science. We are now seeing with our own eyes that increased warming is changing climates around the world. People say "climates have been changing for millions of years". If you notice a climate changing in a single lifetime that change is happening at lightning speed geologically speaking. Climate systems are like a canoe on a river. When Anthropogenic warming began the canoe started to lean to one side. As the world continued to warm the canoe leaned more. Since we are seeing climates changing the canoe has "tipped" over and it does not stabilize until it is upside down.
Actually the same thing happened around 1000 years ago. That's how the Vikings reached Canada, all the ice in the North Sea was melted. It was called the Great Warming Period. It was followed by a mini ice age. The mini ice age happened the same time that the black death broke out in Ukraine while the Mongols were invading. It's what stopped the Mongols from invading Europe and it helped make the Black death less severe. It's called aburbt climate change. Maybe you could learn some history instead of just pretending like everything is new or that the world is ending.
Yes. Carbon dioxide is evil...even though plants need CO2 for the manufacture of oxygen that we in turn need to breathe. Perhaps certain idiots simply need to stop breathing.
I remember in the late 70s early 80s they were saying fluorocarbons in Hairspray was blocking out the sun causing cooling of the Earth. Get your story straight
1:25 it's a huge challenge in the sense that the truck (i.e. the human race) has already driven off the cliff and we're mid-air, wondering why the steering wheel doesn't work.
@@Mike-kr4tq They caught your brother in Pennsylvania (not sure if you knew the abbreviation for Pennsylvania). Think critically comrade because arguments you make and believe in support and lead to many very evil and bad actions.
Florida is like that even more than Austin in terms of number of months but right now Austin beats the snot out of Florida. Common happening, climate poppycock is actually not next to Godliness
Isn't there a huge problem that any hardship and sacrifice we make to reduce emissions will yield no tangible benefit/change for about 10 years, as the feedback process is slow. In a consumerist world we have become accustomed to any need or desire being instantly gratified so this may make the sacrifices required very difficult to sell.
Artificial intelligence (AI) can play a crucial role in combating climate change by offering innovative solutions to regulate temperatures and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Here are some examples of AI solutions that can help regulate temperatures in relation to the issue of global warming: Forecasting and management of renewable energies: AI can be used to predict the production of renewable energies such as solar and wind energy, which are inherently intermittent. By using machine learning models, forecasts can be improved, enabling better integration of renewable energy sources into the power grid. This helps balance the supply and demand of electricity, contributing to the regularization of energy consumption. Optimization of energy consumption: AI can analyze energy consumption patterns in buildings, industries, and cities. By identifying energy inefficiencies, AI can recommend adjustments to reduce energy consumption, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with electricity production. Smart agriculture: AI can monitor and predict agricultural conditions, such as periods of drought or flooding. By identifying optimal times for planting, irrigating, or harvesting, farmers can better manage their crops to maintain yields while avoiding excessive water and resource use, helping regulate agricultural ecosystems and mitigate the impact of climate change. Advanced climate modeling: AI can improve the accuracy of climate models by incorporating a larger amount of data and optimizing model parameters. More accurate climate models help better understand long-term climate trends and identify high-risk areas for adaptation measures. Monitoring and prevention of natural disasters: AI can help monitor extreme weather events such as hurricanes, earthquakes, and floods. By analyzing real-time data, AI can more accurately predict hurricane trajectories or estimate the potential damage caused by a natural disaster. This enables better preparedness, strengthens infrastructure resilience, and saves lives. Intelligent transportation: AI can contribute to improving transport efficiency by optimizing routes, promoting public transportation, and facilitating the adoption of autonomous electric vehicles. More efficient mobility helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. These examples demonstrate how the judicious use of artificial intelligence can contribute to regulating temperatures in the fight against climate change. However, it is essential to note that AI is not a singular solution to the problem of climate change but rather a powerful tool to combine with other efforts, such as adopting effective climate policies and engaging society in the transition to a sustainable economy.
@@davidtaylor857 No it isn't. You are looking at data from a year of peak ice in 1980. Even then it was lower in 2012. If you go back to the seventies, then we are at the same level. It goes in cycles.
You don't know much about how climate change works, do you? If we stop burning fossil fuels, the global average temperature will stop increasing. If we keep burning fossil fuels at the current rate, all bets are off. That adjustment might turn out to be pretty unpleasant, for a lot of people. By unpleasant, I mean losing homes by the millions, losing jobs by the millions, and losing lives by the millions.
Western countries ( 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 🇫🇷 🇬🇧 🇭🇲 etc. ) are the culprits for the highest amount of CO2 emissions historically & cumulatively total since Industrial Revolution 1751 till present date. We are 1/7 of the world population but was responsible for 60% of the total emissions cumulatively to date. Even today, we have some of the highest co2 per capita emissions, multiple times more than many asian countries, despite off-loading manufacturing process to Asia. We should lead by example and partake less in consumerism and push our government to adopt climate change policies asap...
We have simpletons and sociopaths running entire states. DeSantis banned FL cities from focusing on or leading in renewable energy almost two years ago. I’ve been following CC for 30+ years. It’s horrible how the GOP is in big oil’s pocket. Or coal. In OK there is a big ugly oil derrick next to the State Capitol as a source of pride. It’s Lunacy 101. We were embarrassed just looking at it as visitors!
Been below average temperatures in most of the south east for the past three years. Also why is a meteorologist an "expert" on long term weather patterns. They only deal with weather in week time-frames and quite frankly are wrong a long.
Oops, the Southeast has been above average for each of the last 3 years (NOAA). 2020 actually was a record high (1st place); 2021 was the 11th warmest (in 126 years); 2022 was 12th warmest (out of 127 years) and 2023 (year to date) has been the 2nd warmest on record.
I am in favor of global warming. I hate the long, cold winters in Vail, Colorado, where I live. So a year ago I began focusing on increasing my carbon footprint. Thus far I have been able to raise the average daily temperature in Colorado by 4 degrees. I appreciate the help I get from government officials, politicians and celebrities who fly around in private jets. I will continue increasing my carbon footprint until I can grow palm trees on my property.
A heat wave is one thing but a " heat wave " around the entire globe on an unprecedented scale is a horse of a different color. :O( Any slowing of the rotation of the earth , no matter how small , can really help boost the effects of the heat . There are studies that say some of these 9 plus earthquakes have slowed earths rotation which brought to mind all the nuclear explosions we have set off and what did they do if anything. Something to look at and think about. :O)
@@thedrummerboy1215 That could be good news . I am wondering if there is a tipping point at the amount of heat build up could it trigger some kind of reaction ? :O)
It's not unprecedented. All you have to do is research it. These temps are nothing new. They know most people won't bother researching it themselves. That's what the democrats are hoping for.
@@equaltemp7075 What ? This is a global EARTH deal not some wacko politicians idea . What research ? Man do not be ignorant on this my friend. This has zero to do with ANYTHING political. :O)
The people that rarely experience triple digit summer temperatures are primarily the ones concerned about it. Those that live with them every summer don’t really think anything of it.
Global temps were slightly and relatively high and low in the more recent past (1,000s of years) but nothing like the rapid increase we see today. Not even close. There's a reason the temp graph is called a hockey stick.
@@scottekoontzCO2 is carbon dioxide, produced daily by billions breathing which in turn is converted to oxygen by plant life so said billions can breathe. Neat, huh?
I dont need to look up solar cycles I have been studying them professionally for over 50 years. The change in climate cannot be attributed to changes on the Sun. Solar activity dropped for every cycle since 1957 as global temperatures increased (the exact wrong trend). The change in energy input to the Earth by the Sun is only 0.1% from solar minimum to solar maximum over an 11-year period. The elliptical shape of the Earth's orbit changes that input to the Earth by 7% (70 times more in a year!) and we dont notice it.
You have to store it. Solar and wind are unicorn dreams. If we were to power the world today on batteries, the world could be powered 1:15 minutes. You cannot recycle solar panels and wind turbines, it will not happen. There is no money to be made, except when you pay people who worked in the fossil fuel industry, half of what they were making before. To make one Electric Vehicle battery, it takes mining 500,000 tons of earth, those vehicles will not be electrically powered. That is only for E.Vs, your home will require significantly more. Okay, let us talk about industry........ How will those factories operate off of solar? There is absolutely no way solar (or wind) can provide enough power. There is no "Climate Crisis"
Check your numbers. 500,000 tons is easily debunked. You can recycle turbine blades (and they do) and solar panels. Seems Fox entertainment got to you. No need to power the world with batteries only. Other methods are in place or being scaled up. Also, the crazy idea that all wind and all solar generation is down is a strange segue. According to the super majority of people who study this, including those in the gas and oil industry, this is a crises. According to the "skeptics" who were funded by Koch Industries, this is a crises.
@@suzanne9150 The climate and weather both change ...My thought is everything these days is presented as a crisis which causes needless fear ..."The sky is falling" all the time .
Yes, climate always changes but for a reason. Past climate changes have been explained by a combination of natural factors. What has been happening for the last 50-100 years cannot be explained by any single natural phenomenon. Only when you throw in our contributions (fossil fuel burning and land use changes) can the changes be explained both qualitatively and quantitatively.
,,,,,,Climate change [emergency] curious ❓⁉️ Discover the Reasons WHY _given 135 years in Advance via the Gift of Divine Revelation... I highly recommend reading "THE GREAT CONTROVERSY BETWEEN CHRIST AND SATAN" 1888 , REV. 1911
“In other news…the sun is hot. Back to you, Samantha” “Thanks, Tom. Coming up, why are jobless millennials gluing themselves to roads to “save the climate” and how that does absolutely nothing.”
You seem a bit out of touch... Those millenials you hate so much are the largest part of the job market and in some countries are paying for older folks' pensions with no prospects of even owning a home themselves. Gen Z will soon be doing the same. And just because you won't be around for the climate disaster doesn't mean it's not happening. Enjoying the forest fires lately? 🙄
And did you also do your MA in meteorology? All this proves is that you can drive and you lived in the '80s, well done. Great argument. Honestly, don't they teach the basics of the scientific method in the US? 🤦♀️
Oh, you "remember driving thru" Well then, clearly you know more that meteorologists and climatologists who, among many other things, keep accurate records over time.
@@karolinawww6834You don't need to be a meteorologist to know that accurate weather cannot be predicted more than three days out anymore than you need to be a mathematician to add one and one.
@@Muddslinger0415 the sun is the reason. Feel how hot it is. But money can be made if it is man's mistake. What is the average nightly low? Snowiest winter in a long time, hot summer. I predict it will be winter next year, followed by summer. But you can write a check to mother nature if it makes you feel better
At least he is telling us some facts that are correct. He failed to mention that for the last three years we have had a La Niña event in the southern pacific oscillation, but this year we are seeing a very robust El Niño event that is causing weather events around the world. We can find reports that the Arctic was warmer in the 1930s and 40s then at the present time and we all remember the alarms founded by Professor William Karlsson in February 1952, that the Arctic was melting at a record level. He was predicting that melting ice, then with the swamp sea ports. We also have to be concerned with the location of the Stevensons Screens (instrument enclosure) that report weather conditions. Researchers have located the best majority of these only to find that they are near heat generating areas such as parking, lots, buildings, and one was located near a missing vent at a dumpsite. These enclosures contain electronic instruments that generate heat. The weather reporting station at. Nuuk, Greenland is located at an airport and the subject to jet engine heat as well as radiant energy from the surrounding cement facility. We can expect also smoke from the Canadian wildfires to cool the waters of the Atlantic. The bottom line is that there have been so much manipulation, and so many errors that we can be certain that the future is predictable but the past is uncertain.
Yeah, you went right off the rails. El Nino hasn't even fully materialized and we just had back to La Ninas and we still blew out records with average global temperatures in the top 5 years being set. It's going to get wilder as the El Nino comes, this Fall and really sets in. As far as your nonsense about the Arctic being warmer you are way out in crazy land. A lot of people died trying to find a sea route over Canada and now you take a cruise up there. You are way out in fantasy land.
You can’t be human bots usually spread this nonsense but just in case you are a flat earther you might want to read some science and math books 2+2 is still 4 and the carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere is 424 parts per million instead of it’s multi million year average of 275 ppm to 295 ppm we have dumped enough Co2 from ancient 150 million year old sequestered fossil fuels to warm the planet past 1.5 degrees Celsius and very very likely 2 degrees Celsius which is where the feedback loops kick in even and especially more catastrophically than the impacts you are seeing this second in the news open your EYES!!!!
I have seen no difference in the weather and climate where I live in the last 50 years. What we are seeing is the norm, but young people who don't know any better want to believe we are on the verge of extinction so they have something to fight against. That is what happens when people are bored and have too much spare time on their hands.
@@willmont8258 Yes, because your tiny not trained non scientific perspective on a GLOBAL problem carries more weight than 88,000 peer reviewed scientific papers. Talk about Dunning Kruger effect gone wild.
Thank god I gave up God to preserve my sanity! Tell with all the advanced technology in the world how is it you ignore all that to say God is behind these climate and weather changes?
It's both hilarious and sad to see how affective their fear-mongering has been. So, it's never been 110-120 degrees before? As a kid, I remember days so hot that I had trouble breathing. That was 40 years ago. So clearly, the recent temps we've been having is nothing new. Do your own research and you'll see that the temps have not been consistently rising. And FYI, cold weather has been responsible for more deaths than heat has.
If you did just a small amount of research you'd understand that this is reality, not fear mongering. No one is saying 110-120 degrees never happened. That's what we call a deviation. It's not the norm but it happened. When 110-120 becomes the norm that's a different story. Eventually we're gonna have to face reality.
The IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change: Increased Flooding: not detected, no attribution. Increased Meteorological Drought: not detected, no attribution. Increased Hydrological Drought: not detected, no attribution. Increased Tropical Cyclones: not detected, no attribution. Increased Winter Storms: not detected, no attribution. Increased Thunderstorms: not detected, no attribution. Increased Hail: not detected, no attribution. increased lightning: not detected, no attribution. Increased Extreme Winds: not detected, no attribution. There is no climate crisis.
Your IPCC summary is way off ... Perhaps you should read what they actually said and the papers they refer to. From Chapter 11: "It is extremely likely that human influence is the main contributor to the observed increase in the intensity and frequency of hot extremes and the observed decrease in the intensity and frequency of cold extremes on the global scale." "Most of the observed intensification of heavy precipitation over land regions is likely due to anthropogenic influence, for which greenhouse gases emissions are the main contributor. " "There is low confidence in attributing changes in the probability or magnitude of flood events to human influence because of a limited number of studies" You forgot to mention that it was not because there is no link but there isa lack of data. Not the same thing. "There is medium confidence that human-induced climate change has contributed to increasing trends in the probability or intensity of recent agricultural and ecological droughts, leading to an increase of the affected land area." Not no attribution as you claim. "The recent active TC seasons in the North Atlantic, the North Pacific, and Arabian basins cannot be explained without an anthropogenic influence." You dont seem to be an old scientist, more like a young propagandist.
@drkstrong Pages 1761 - 1765, Table 11.A.2 Synthesis table summarising assessments Heavy Precipitation: 24 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (12 medium confidence, so 50-50), 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution. Agricultural Drought: 31 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (14 medium confidence, so 50-50. No high confidence assessment). 42 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (3 medium, no high confidence). Ecological Drought as above. Hydrological Drought: 38 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend. 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (2 medium confidence, no high confidence). So basically the IPCC are saying we haven't caused drought and we didn't make it rain. Globally the ACE index (accumulated cyclone energy) 1980-2021 shows no increasing trend. Global Hurricane Landfalls 1970-2021 (updated from Weinkle et al, 2012) shows no trend. Satellite data since 1980 shows a slight downward global trend for total hurricaine numbers with 2021 being a record low year. From the NOAA GFDL website 'Global Warming and Hurricanes, An Overview of Current Research' (dated Feb. 9, 2023). And I quote "We conclude that the historical Atlantic hurricane data at this stage do not provide compelling evidence for a substantial greenhouse warming-induced century-scale increase in: frequency of tropical storms, hurricanes, or major hurricanes, or in the proportion of hurricanes that become major hurricanes." Multidecadal variability in Atlantic hurricaines is most probably related to the AMO (Vecchi et al, 2021). NOAA data 1851-2021 shows no trend in number of hurricaine landfalls with the record high being 1886. There is also no trend in the frequency of major hurricanes (Cat 3 +) for the same period, although the trend for the last 20 years is downwards. It makes no difference if you look at the Pacific. Using data from the JMA 1951-2022 we see typhoon activity trending downwards for over 7 decades.
@@OldScientist You forget to mention that those with low confidence or no attribution are those with a paucity of data, not because there is no association or trend. You focus on landfall of hurricanes rather than the number or severity. It was long established that as the oceans warm the number of hurricanes will likely fall but their severity would increase. The severity (number of Cat 3 or higher) has increased. According to NOAA's GFDL the increase in cyclones is a rate of about 0.15/year from 1980 to present. That agrees well with the Vecchi et al. (2008) results from 1880 onwards (most of which has been since 1985).
@drkstrong So there's little or no evidence that human activity has caused droughts or flooding. Landfall is used to make fair and continued comparison with earlier times (for example before satellite imagery) when many storms would have been missed. Including all storms has the appearance of inflating numbers in more recent times. And let's have it again from the NOAA GFDL website 'Global Warming and Hurricanes, An Overview of Current Research' (dated Feb. 9, 2023). And I quote "We conclude that the historical Atlantic hurricane data at this stage do not provide compelling evidence for a substantial greenhouse warming-induced century-scale increase in: frequency of tropical storms, hurricanes, or major hurricanes, or in the proportion of hurricanes that become major hurricanes." Got that: no compelling evidence of GREENHOUSE WARMING-INDUCED blah blah blah. We have not caused storms, droughts or flooding. There is no global climate crisis.
Ocean temps have never reached 100 degrees and destroyed the coral reefs. Healthy coral reefs are one of the most valuable ecosystems on Earth. They provide billions of dollars in economic and environmental services, such as food, coastal protection and tourism. However, coral ecosystems face serious threats, mainly from the effects of global climate change, unsustainable fishing and land-based pollution.
It seems to me that environmental change has been happening since earth gained it's magnetic field. Now we're going to try to stop something that has been happening since the beginning?
Yes, climate always changes but for a reason. Past climate changes have been explained by a combination of natural factors. What has been happening for the last 50-100 years cannot be explained by any single natural phenomenon. Only when you throw in our contributions (fossil fuel burning and land use changes) can the changes be explained both qualitatively and quantitatively.
@drkstrong is comparing 50 to 100 years of data to 50 to 100 million years, actually going to give us substantial solid evidence? I just don't think it yields enough real data quality. I'm not suddenly suggesting that polluting our environment is good or okay. I think there's too many emotional thinkers who believe their feelings are always correct. Emotions never yield correct answers. Emotional thinkers always protest against the absolute wrong companies. I've watched so many protesters, absolutely ruined the very thing they are requesting to have changed. Yes, the climate is going to change, go, and look at what happened in the year 536. There were no cars, no nukes, and no power plants.
@@Stopandthink24 Strange how I am told that the weather has changed so much that we are now on the verge of extinction, even though there is no difference in weather and climate where I live than there was 50 years ago.
Would you also ignore several doctors if they told you have cancer or some other serious malady? Your short dismissive comment is evidence that you haven't paid much attention to the way in which weather has become more extreme. And this was predicted to happen decades ago although these extremes are WORSE than predicted!! Your last comment also highlights your narrow perspective. Why do you think it's called GLOBAL WARMING?? It's much more than just where you live!
The Sun is not at Solar Minimum (its on its way towards solar maximum). What does a pole flip have to do with anything, especially as there is no evidence that it is flipping, just moving as it always has done. What space weather effects change climate? None! 11-year cycles do not produce a 100-year trend.
@@pparrker5420 Are you saying that you don't understand Dunning Kruger? I thought that was standard knowledge on UA-cam!? Anyway, you do know to search for information don't you?
Chicago had the worst air quality in the world because of wildfires in Canada, and yet some idiots still think this is all normal. 🤣
Do you not realize forest fires have been burning in Canada for a long time
Maybe your boy shouldn't have set those fires yeah the truth is out there. Can't produce lightning strikes without clouds in Canada kinda hard. Now drones can be traced especially when people are stupid enough to leave the GPS on 😮
Forest fires never happened before.
Every dumb liberal
@@kmoses582 Wildfires have been the norm in those regions of Canada and the US since before the burning of fossils fuel even began.
@@kmoses582That affect air quality in North Carolina? 😂
We are doomed because of greed!
We are doomed because of bots!
If scientists are right nuclear war followed by nuclear winter ought to cool off the planet for a while; perhaps three to ten years. 😀
The scary part is we had the science in the 80's. If CO2 continues to climb so will the temperature. Greed ignored the science. We are now seeing with our own eyes that increased warming is changing climates around the world. People say "climates have been changing for millions of years". If you notice a climate changing in a single lifetime that change is happening at lightning speed geologically speaking. Climate systems are like a canoe on a river. When Anthropogenic warming began the canoe started to lean to one side. As the world continued to warm the canoe leaned more. Since we are seeing climates changing the canoe has "tipped" over and it does not stabilize until it is upside down.
blah, blah, blah when China stops having over double U.S. carbon output, maybe you will have something
Actually the same thing happened around 1000 years ago. That's how the Vikings reached Canada, all the ice in the North Sea was melted. It was called the Great Warming Period. It was followed by a mini ice age. The mini ice age happened the same time that the black death broke out in Ukraine while the Mongols were invading. It's what stopped the Mongols from invading Europe and it helped make the Black death less severe. It's called aburbt climate change. Maybe you could learn some history instead of just pretending like everything is new or that the world is ending.
Yes. Carbon dioxide is evil...even though plants need CO2 for the manufacture of oxygen that we in turn need to breathe. Perhaps certain idiots simply need to stop breathing.
I remember in the late 70s early 80s they were saying fluorocarbons in Hairspray was blocking out the sun causing cooling of the Earth. Get your story straight
I live in Seattle. We used to be under a mile and a half tall glacier until Native Americans drove too many SUV's and melted it all.
1:25 it's a huge challenge in the sense that the truck (i.e. the human race) has already driven off the cliff and we're mid-air, wondering why the steering wheel doesn't work.
True. You should spare yourself further suffering and just end it all now...
Whose truck? What the truck? Cliff? There was a steering wheel?
How dare you misgender that truck!
@@LibtardsareFuntotalkto Think critically comrade because arguments you make and believe in support and lead to many very evil and bad actions.
@@Mike-kr4tq They caught your brother in Pennsylvania (not sure if you knew the abbreviation for Pennsylvania). Think critically comrade because arguments you make and believe in support and lead to many very evil and bad actions.
Here in Florida, it is not just hot outside! It is FRIGGIN' hot outside! The Sun is showing no mercy to us and it is doing it for FUN! 🥵🥵
Florida is like that even more than Austin in terms of number of months but right now Austin beats the snot out of Florida. Common happening, climate poppycock is actually not next to Godliness
Plant trees for shade around your house then. Stop complaining and provide a solution
You live in a MAGA state. Ron DeSantis would tell it's fake....and to stop being a woke ❄️ and quit your whining about stuff made up by leftists
From New Mexico... It's really hot! Fighting with my garden! And I live in high desert!
well....keep voting for Trump out there! He will tell you it will be cool in a few months and climate change is a hoax.
Thanks for these important reports!
So when's the ice age?
@@Mike-kr4tq
I bet you thought that made sense.
@@jockyoung4491 soo.. when's the ice age?
@@jockyoung4491 as they stated in the 70s and 80s... an ice age Is coming.
@@jockyoung4491 I thought NYC was supposed to be under water by 2013?
Imagine 50°c comes and then electricity goes off
For Americans 50°c is a little over 120°F.
I was going to say 54C is a medium-rare steak!
Thank you mr meteorologist, and all others.
No one is listening. All they see is dollar signs
It was hotter in the 1930s
More lies and more lies it is shocking that people believe in this nonsense
Stop playing with that haarp
Oh, they're not just "playing" with it anymore...
@@small_ed No and they built another one
It closed in 2014
Which is worse, climate change or climate change deniers?
you, that is easy
Idiots that drive around battery cars thinking they are saving the planet
Human beings are already doomed
Isn't there a huge problem that any hardship and sacrifice we make to reduce emissions will yield no tangible benefit/change for about 10 years, as the feedback process is slow. In a consumerist world we have become accustomed to any need or desire being instantly gratified so this may make the sacrifices required very difficult to sell.
Artificial intelligence (AI) can play a crucial role in combating climate change by offering innovative solutions to regulate temperatures and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Here are some examples of AI solutions that can help regulate temperatures in relation to the issue of global warming:
Forecasting and management of renewable energies: AI can be used to predict the production of renewable energies such as solar and wind energy, which are inherently intermittent. By using machine learning models, forecasts can be improved, enabling better integration of renewable energy sources into the power grid. This helps balance the supply and demand of electricity, contributing to the regularization of energy consumption.
Optimization of energy consumption: AI can analyze energy consumption patterns in buildings, industries, and cities. By identifying energy inefficiencies, AI can recommend adjustments to reduce energy consumption, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with electricity production.
Smart agriculture: AI can monitor and predict agricultural conditions, such as periods of drought or flooding. By identifying optimal times for planting, irrigating, or harvesting, farmers can better manage their crops to maintain yields while avoiding excessive water and resource use, helping regulate agricultural ecosystems and mitigate the impact of climate change.
Advanced climate modeling: AI can improve the accuracy of climate models by incorporating a larger amount of data and optimizing model parameters. More accurate climate models help better understand long-term climate trends and identify high-risk areas for adaptation measures.
Monitoring and prevention of natural disasters: AI can help monitor extreme weather events such as hurricanes, earthquakes, and floods. By analyzing real-time data, AI can more accurately predict hurricane trajectories or estimate the potential damage caused by a natural disaster. This enables better preparedness, strengthens infrastructure resilience, and saves lives.
Intelligent transportation: AI can contribute to improving transport efficiency by optimizing routes, promoting public transportation, and facilitating the adoption of autonomous electric vehicles. More efficient mobility helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector.
These examples demonstrate how the judicious use of artificial intelligence can contribute to regulating temperatures in the fight against climate change. However, it is essential to note that AI is not a singular solution to the problem of climate change but rather a powerful tool to combine with other efforts, such as adopting effective climate policies and engaging society in the transition to a sustainable economy.
AI will suggest killing humanity. it WILL solve the problem easily 😑
AI can allegedly do a lot of things but it cant make the politicians act.
Good points. Although I wonder if AI will wake up, analyze the situation, and then tell us the obvious - stop putting so much CO2 into the atmosphere.
@@jaysanguinetti368 I respect you! 🙂👍
It's up to you to believe or not to grow!
@@drkstrong I respect you! 🙂👍
It's up to you to believe or not to grow!
And Arctic Sea Ice is the same as it was 50 years ago
Your statement is absolutely not true. Sea ice in the Arctic declining at an exponential rate.
@@davidtaylor857 No it isn't. You are looking at data from a year of peak ice in 1980. Even then it was lower in 2012. If you go back to the seventies, then we are at the same level. It goes in cycles.
This is where AI may do some good for solutions. Trouble is it may come up with some brilliant ideas that will take away from the rich corporations.
Truth
or Dare
Here we go.... bring on the climate change alarmists
The idea is learn to make adjustments, prepare for emergencies and things are always going to change.
things arent going to change...THEY ARE GOING TO COLLAPSE
You don't know much about how climate change works, do you?
If we stop burning fossil fuels, the global average temperature will stop increasing.
If we keep burning fossil fuels at the current rate, all bets are off. That adjustment might turn out to be pretty unpleasant, for a lot of people. By unpleasant, I mean losing homes by the millions, losing jobs by the millions, and losing lives by the millions.
Very optimistic, but we're already burning, literally and figuratively
Western countries ( 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 🇫🇷 🇬🇧 🇭🇲 etc. ) are the culprits for the highest amount of CO2 emissions historically & cumulatively total since Industrial Revolution 1751 till present date.
We are 1/7 of the world population but was responsible for 60% of the total emissions cumulatively to date.
Even today, we have some of the highest co2 per capita emissions, multiple times more than many asian countries, despite off-loading manufacturing process to Asia.
We should lead by example and partake less in consumerism and push our government to adopt climate change policies asap...
We have simpletons and sociopaths running entire states. DeSantis banned FL cities from focusing on or leading in renewable energy almost two years ago. I’ve been following CC for 30+ years. It’s horrible how the GOP is in big oil’s pocket. Or coal. In OK there is a big ugly oil derrick next to the State Capitol as a source of pride. It’s Lunacy 101. We were embarrassed just looking at it as visitors!
Been below average temperatures in most of the south east for the past three years. Also why is a meteorologist an "expert" on long term weather patterns. They only deal with weather in week time-frames and quite frankly are wrong a long.
Oops, the Southeast has been above average for each of the last 3 years (NOAA). 2020 actually was a record high (1st place); 2021 was the 11th warmest (in 126 years); 2022 was 12th warmest (out of 127 years) and 2023 (year to date) has been the 2nd warmest on record.
I knew summer would happen. I saw all of this coming.
I am in favor of global warming. I hate the long, cold winters in Vail, Colorado, where I live. So a year ago I began focusing on increasing my carbon footprint. Thus far I have been able to raise the average daily temperature in Colorado by 4 degrees. I appreciate the help I get from government officials, politicians and celebrities who fly around in private jets. I will continue increasing my carbon footprint until I can grow palm trees on my property.
Global warming does nothing to change the length of the winter, the hours of daylight are to do with the seasons (tilt of the Earth's rotation axis)
Meteorologists are about to turn into Doomsayers.
They can’t tell you if it’s going to rain tomorrow
Its joe bidens fault 😂😂😂😂
You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink.
It's called Summer..he should be fired
What happens to the southern hemisphere? Asking for a flat earther.
Fossil fuels consumption is the culprit
And
Murdering animals and exploiting them for their byproducts is something to consider as well
You act like bad weather never happened in the past
Being a dummy Dem/Dim is the culprit, I say stop the lies
@@kmoses582 murdering animals is not ideal for your conscience
@@sandiharris5906 murdering animals is not a good look for you
@@Soulfulvision1111 I love murdering animals, I guess people where vegan in the past and thats why there was never bad weather before 1800s
A heat wave is one thing but a " heat wave " around the entire globe on an unprecedented scale is a horse of a different color. :O( Any slowing of the rotation of the earth , no matter how small , can really help boost the effects of the heat . There are studies that say some of these 9 plus earthquakes have slowed earths rotation which brought to mind all the nuclear explosions we have set off and what did they do if anything. Something to look at and think about. :O)
there are heat waves and LYING BIGLY waves, the 2nd is foremost
@@sandiharris5906 Huh ? You do not believe any of this ? :O)
@@thedrummerboy1215 That could be good news . I am wondering if there is a tipping point at the amount of heat build up could it trigger some kind of reaction ? :O)
It's not unprecedented. All you have to do is research it. These temps are nothing new. They know most people won't bother researching it themselves. That's what the democrats are hoping for.
@@equaltemp7075 What ? This is a global EARTH deal not some wacko politicians idea . What research ? Man do not be ignorant on this my friend. This has zero to do with ANYTHING political. :O)
The people that rarely experience triple digit summer temperatures are primarily the ones concerned about it. Those that live with them every summer don’t really think anything of it.
the world’s temperature was quite high during 600 and 700, then significantly dropped 900
Global temps were slightly and relatively high and low in the more recent past (1,000s of years) but nothing like the rapid increase we see today. Not even close. There's a reason the temp graph is called a hockey stick.
Solar cycles, look it up.
CO2. Look it up.
Less solar irradiation, loo it up.
No relationship to solar cycles, look it up.
@@scottekoontzCO2 is carbon dioxide, produced daily by billions breathing which in turn is converted to oxygen by plant life so said billions can breathe. Neat, huh?
I dont need to look up solar cycles I have been studying them professionally for over 50 years.
The change in climate cannot be attributed to changes on the Sun. Solar activity dropped for every cycle since 1957 as global temperatures increased (the exact wrong trend). The change in energy input to the Earth by the Sun is only 0.1% from solar minimum to solar maximum over an 11-year period. The elliptical shape of the Earth's orbit changes that input to the Earth by 7% (70 times more in a year!) and we dont notice it.
You have to store it. Solar and wind are unicorn dreams. If we were to power the world today on batteries, the world could be powered 1:15 minutes. You cannot recycle solar panels and wind turbines, it will not happen. There is no money to be made, except when you pay people who worked in the fossil fuel industry, half of what they were making before.
To make one Electric Vehicle battery, it takes mining 500,000 tons of earth, those vehicles will not be electrically powered.
That is only for E.Vs, your home will require significantly more.
Okay, let us talk about industry........ How will those factories operate off of solar? There is absolutely no way solar (or wind) can provide enough power.
There is no "Climate Crisis"
Check your numbers. 500,000 tons is easily debunked. You can recycle turbine blades (and they do) and solar panels. Seems Fox entertainment got to you.
No need to power the world with batteries only. Other methods are in place or being scaled up. Also, the crazy idea that all wind and all solar generation is down is a strange segue.
According to the super majority of people who study this, including those in the gas and oil industry, this is a crises. According to the "skeptics" who were funded by Koch Industries, this is a crises.
This climate change is my number one big truth and needs to be yours!
It's called seasons
The misinformation here is carzy
In some of the comments? Yes you are quite right!
So carzy
let me know when people are rushing to Greenland and Northern Canada, lies are next to Godliness
Lol ok keep telling yourself what you have too
@@Muddslinger0415Why don't you show the way?
Money rule the crazy.🤡
Outlaw coal mining. Outlaw making plastic.
What will EVs be made of?
@@leonblack2651EVs require more fossil fuel consumption indirectly than internal combustion engines directly!
@@leonblack2651we have to essentially go to living off the land and give up just about all of our prized possessions
Outlaw metropolitan areas.
In NY it's toooo H🔥T and those thunderstorm are making the city into a sauna!😧
It's the weather ...So, what can Weatherman do ? Nothing ,I'll bet ... DUH....
Oh, John...
It's climate....learn the difference.
@@suzanne9150 The climate and weather both change ...My thought is everything these days is presented as a crisis which causes needless fear ..."The sky is falling" all the time .
It's called different weather. It's been happening for millions of years. Calm down.
The problem is the progression of consolidated media, hype, and deliberate geoengineering.
Yes, climate always changes but for a reason. Past climate changes have been explained by a combination of natural factors. What has been happening for the last 50-100 years cannot be explained by any single natural phenomenon. Only when you throw in our contributions (fossil fuel burning and land use changes) can the changes be explained both qualitatively and quantitatively.
,,,,,,Climate change [emergency] curious ❓⁉️
Discover the Reasons WHY _given 135 years in Advance via the Gift of Divine Revelation...
I highly recommend reading "THE GREAT CONTROVERSY BETWEEN CHRIST AND SATAN" 1888 , REV. 1911
“In other news…the sun is hot. Back to you, Samantha”
“Thanks, Tom. Coming up, why are jobless millennials gluing themselves to roads to “save the climate” and how that does absolutely nothing.”
You seem a bit out of touch... Those millenials you hate so much are the largest part of the job market and in some countries are paying for older folks' pensions with no prospects of even owning a home themselves. Gen Z will soon be doing the same. And just because you won't be around for the climate disaster doesn't mean it's not happening. Enjoying the forest fires lately? 🙄
I remember driving thru Arizona/Nevada in the 1980's - every day was 110 F
okay back to the climate crisis
New plan: Try thinking prior to commenting.
and now 120+ is common , don't be a nonce
And did you also do your MA in meteorology? All this proves is that you can drive and you lived in the '80s, well done. Great argument. Honestly, don't they teach the basics of the scientific method in the US? 🤦♀️
Also, that's not how you spell 1980s btw. I'm not even a native speaker and I know that
Oh, you "remember driving thru" Well then, clearly you know more that meteorologists and climatologists who, among many other things, keep accurate records over time.
"Long-term shifts in temperatures"...yet multiple climate-related "disasters" are suddenly happening each year and _only_ in the U.S. and/or Canada.
Is this the same guy that can't accurately predict the weather more than 2 days out?
He's a scientist not a fortune teller. You're clearly a meteorologist too, so why don't you take his job and do it better 😂
@@karolinawww6834You don't need to be a meteorologist to know that accurate weather cannot be predicted more than three days out anymore than you need to be a mathematician to add one and one.
weather is not climate
@@small_ed obviously, that was sort of my point, tell it to Leon there 😉
He should check out some actual data, but political science is more lucrative than actual science.
Political science IS the new "science" 😂
I checked the data and he is correct.
@@drkstrong Which NOAA stations did you use?
@@youtubecensors5419 I used the analyses from various groups, not just NOAA
@@drkstrong And what did you find, globally over the last century and last 20,000 years?
Extreme heat??? Why is it raining then?
😂😂😂
Remember that one summer a few years back when it was over 100° for 2 months straight? Oh I guess you don't
Yeah that was 100 not 125
@@Muddslinger0415 the sun is the reason. Feel how hot it is. But money can be made if it is man's mistake. What is the average nightly low? Snowiest winter in a long time, hot summer. I predict it will be winter next year, followed by summer. But you can write a check to mother nature if it makes you feel better
At least he is telling us some facts that are correct. He failed to mention that for the last three years we have had a La Niña event in the southern pacific oscillation, but this year we are seeing a very robust El Niño event that is causing weather events around the world. We can find reports that the Arctic was warmer in the 1930s and 40s then at the present time and we all remember the alarms founded by Professor William Karlsson in February 1952, that the Arctic was melting at a record level. He was predicting that melting ice, then with the swamp sea ports.
We also have to be concerned with the location of the Stevensons Screens (instrument enclosure) that report weather conditions. Researchers have located the best majority of these only to find that they are near heat generating areas such as parking, lots, buildings, and one was located near a missing vent at a dumpsite. These enclosures contain electronic instruments that generate heat. The weather reporting station at. Nuuk, Greenland is located at an airport and the subject to jet engine heat as well as radiant energy from the surrounding cement facility.
We can expect also smoke from the Canadian wildfires to cool the waters of the Atlantic. The bottom line is that there have been so much manipulation, and so many errors that we can be certain that the future is predictable but the past is uncertain.
This is just operation blue beam.
Yeah, you went right off the rails. El Nino hasn't even fully materialized and we just had back to La Ninas and we still blew out records with average global temperatures in the top 5 years being set.
It's going to get wilder as the El Nino comes, this Fall and really sets in.
As far as your nonsense about the Arctic being warmer you are way out in crazy land. A lot of people died trying to find a sea route over Canada and now you take a cruise up there.
You are way out in fantasy land.
The manipulation has been made by the fossil fuel industry.
@@Hawkins202X
And it is always carefully crafted by campbell with that intention .
You can’t be human bots usually spread this nonsense but just in case you are a flat earther you might want to read some science and math books 2+2 is still 4 and the carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere is 424 parts per million instead of it’s multi million year average of 275 ppm to 295 ppm we have dumped enough Co2 from ancient 150 million year old sequestered fossil fuels to warm the planet past 1.5 degrees Celsius and very very likely 2 degrees Celsius which is where the feedback loops kick in even and especially more catastrophically than the impacts you are seeing this second in the news open your EYES!!!!
MSDNC's fantastically amazing lack of bias and doggedly investigative journalism is what brings its dozens of fans here!
R u talking fox news😂😂😂😂😂
@gerardoresendiz6731 no he's talking about msnbc!
@@Mike-kr4tq lol I know all media are corporations they’re in for the money but Fox News a propaganda Chanel for republicans worse of them all
@@gerardoresendiz6731 So you agree MSDNC = Fox. Got it
It's called climate cycles not climate change that would be meteorology. ✌🏼
As a 58 year old I say the weather is not different. People have become infants.
Ok dunning Kruger
@@theredbat5323 OK infant
I have seen no difference in the weather and climate where I live in the last 50 years. What we are seeing is the norm, but young people who don't know any better want to believe we are on the verge of extinction so they have something to fight against. That is what happens when people are bored and have too much spare time on their hands.
@@willmont8258 liberals aren't very bright. They still believe what politicians tell them.
@@willmont8258 Yes, because your tiny not trained non scientific perspective on a GLOBAL problem carries more weight than 88,000 peer reviewed scientific papers. Talk about Dunning Kruger effect gone wild.
Welcome to "1984". Find the book and read it.
@@Stopandthink24 Thank You. What is the old saying? Those that do not know the truth are doomed to repeat it.
Ain't climate, it is God, we are years into the tribulation and a lot of you are gonna die soon, come Lord come, no mercy.
Thank god I gave up God to preserve my sanity!
Tell with all the advanced technology in the world how is it you ignore all that to say God is behind these climate and weather changes?
It's both hilarious and sad to see how affective their fear-mongering has been. So, it's never been 110-120 degrees before? As a kid, I remember days so hot that I had trouble breathing. That was 40 years ago. So clearly, the recent temps we've been having is nothing new. Do your own research and you'll see that the temps have not been consistently rising. And FYI, cold weather has been responsible for more deaths than heat has.
If you did just a small amount of research you'd understand that this is reality, not fear mongering. No one is saying 110-120 degrees never happened. That's what we call a deviation. It's not the norm but it happened. When 110-120 becomes the norm that's a different story. Eventually we're gonna have to face reality.
The IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change:
Increased Flooding: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Meteorological Drought: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Hydrological Drought: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Tropical Cyclones: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Winter Storms: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Thunderstorms: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Hail: not detected, no attribution.
increased lightning: not detected, no attribution.
Increased Extreme Winds: not detected, no attribution.
There is no climate crisis.
Your IPCC summary is way off ... Perhaps you should read what they actually said and the papers they refer to.
From Chapter 11:
"It is extremely likely that human influence is the main contributor to the observed increase in the intensity and frequency of hot extremes and the observed decrease in the intensity and frequency of cold extremes on the global scale."
"Most of the observed intensification of heavy precipitation over land regions is likely due to anthropogenic influence, for which greenhouse gases emissions are the main contributor. "
"There is low confidence in attributing changes in the probability or magnitude of flood events to human influence because of a limited number of studies" You forgot to mention that it was not because there is no link but there isa lack of data. Not the same thing.
"There is medium confidence that human-induced climate change has contributed to increasing trends in the probability or intensity of recent agricultural and ecological droughts, leading to an increase of the affected land area." Not no attribution as you claim.
"The recent active TC seasons in the North Atlantic, the North Pacific, and Arabian basins cannot be explained without an anthropogenic influence."
You dont seem to be an old scientist, more like a young propagandist.
@drkstrong Pages 1761 - 1765, Table 11.A.2 Synthesis table summarising assessments
Heavy Precipitation: 24 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (12 medium confidence, so 50-50), 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution.
Agricultural Drought: 31 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend
(14 medium confidence, so 50-50. No high confidence assessment). 42 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (3 medium, no high confidence).
Ecological Drought as above.
Hydrological Drought: 38 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend.
43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (2 medium confidence, no high confidence).
So basically the IPCC are saying we haven't caused drought and we didn't make it rain.
Globally the ACE index (accumulated cyclone energy) 1980-2021 shows no increasing trend. Global Hurricane Landfalls 1970-2021 (updated from Weinkle et al, 2012) shows no trend. Satellite data since 1980 shows a slight downward global trend for total hurricaine numbers with 2021 being a record low year. From the NOAA GFDL website 'Global Warming and Hurricanes, An Overview of Current Research' (dated Feb. 9, 2023). And I quote "We conclude that the historical Atlantic hurricane data at this stage do not provide compelling evidence for a substantial greenhouse warming-induced century-scale increase in: frequency of tropical storms, hurricanes, or major hurricanes, or in the proportion of hurricanes that become major hurricanes." Multidecadal variability in Atlantic hurricaines is most probably related to the AMO (Vecchi et al, 2021). NOAA data 1851-2021 shows no trend in number of hurricaine landfalls with the record high being 1886. There is also no trend in the frequency of major hurricanes (Cat 3 +) for the same period, although the trend for the last 20 years is downwards. It makes no difference if you look at the Pacific. Using data from the JMA 1951-2022 we see typhoon activity trending downwards for over 7 decades.
@@OldScientist You forget to mention that those with low confidence or no attribution are those with a paucity of data, not because there is no association or trend.
You focus on landfall of hurricanes rather than the number or severity. It was long established that as the oceans warm the number of hurricanes will likely fall but their severity would increase. The severity (number of Cat 3 or higher) has increased.
According to NOAA's GFDL the increase in cyclones is a rate of about 0.15/year from 1980 to present. That agrees well with the Vecchi et al. (2008) results from 1880 onwards (most of which has been since 1985).
@drkstrong So there's little or no evidence that human activity has caused droughts or flooding.
Landfall is used to make fair and continued comparison with earlier times (for example before satellite imagery) when many storms would have been missed. Including all storms has the appearance of inflating numbers in more recent times.
And let's have it again from the NOAA GFDL website 'Global Warming and Hurricanes, An Overview of Current Research' (dated Feb. 9, 2023). And I quote "We conclude that the historical Atlantic hurricane data at this stage do not provide compelling evidence for a substantial greenhouse warming-induced century-scale increase in: frequency of tropical storms, hurricanes, or major hurricanes, or in the proportion of hurricanes that become major hurricanes."
Got that: no compelling evidence of GREENHOUSE WARMING-INDUCED blah blah blah.
We have not caused storms, droughts or flooding. There is no global climate crisis.
Heatwaves and thunderstorms in July. For years they called that 'summer'.
🙈
Wait until winter, the climate will change yet again, the humanity!!
Ocean temps have never reached 100 degrees and destroyed the coral reefs. Healthy coral reefs are one of the most valuable ecosystems on Earth. They provide billions of dollars in economic and environmental services, such as food, coastal protection and tourism. However, coral ecosystems face serious threats, mainly from the effects of global climate change, unsustainable fishing and land-based pollution.
MUCH WORM
Stop being afraid, people.
Tell that to Repubs
@@Stopandthink24 The "planning" we are told we need to do would make everyone and everything worse off.
@Matt-1147
Because it's constantly being framed as a climate "crisis."
Fear is a tool
shhhhh! they have a plan! be quiet pls
It seems to me that environmental change has been happening since earth gained it's magnetic field. Now we're going to try to stop something that has been happening since the beginning?
Yes, climate always changes but for a reason. Past climate changes have been explained by a combination of natural factors. What has been happening for the last 50-100 years cannot be explained by any single natural phenomenon. Only when you throw in our contributions (fossil fuel burning and land use changes) can the changes be explained both qualitatively and quantitatively.
@drkstrong is comparing 50 to 100 years of data to 50 to 100 million years, actually going to give us substantial solid evidence? I just don't think it yields enough real data quality. I'm not suddenly suggesting that polluting our environment is good or okay. I think there's too many emotional thinkers who believe their feelings are always correct. Emotions never yield correct answers. Emotional thinkers always protest against the absolute wrong companies. I've watched so many protesters, absolutely ruined the very thing they are requesting to have changed. Yes, the climate is going to change, go, and look at what happened in the year 536. There were no cars, no nukes, and no power plants.
Fake news...
This "extreme weather" has been going on all my life, and it is not any different now than it was 50 years ago.
The comments shows that there are way too many people who refuse to look at the entire world, they can not see beyond their nose. Wake the f up.
@@Stopandthink24 No it isn't.
@@Stopandthink24 Strange how I am told that the weather has changed so much that we are now on the verge of extinction, even though there is no difference in weather and climate where I live than there was 50 years ago.
Would you also ignore several doctors if they told you have cancer or some other serious malady? Your short dismissive comment is evidence that you haven't paid much attention to the way in which weather has become more extreme. And this was predicted to happen decades ago although these extremes are WORSE than predicted!!
Your last comment also highlights your narrow perspective. Why do you think it's called GLOBAL WARMING?? It's much more than just where you live!
Ok dunning Kruger
I am enjoying global warming I am in my gasoline boat. Hope it stays warm all winter.
Because it's all about you
Because you are a science denier you don't understand the consequences of it staying warm all winter.
@@Stopandthink24 Are you inside running your Air conditioner put hot air into Air.
@@dennisharrell2236 Do you support slavery.
@@Stopandthink24 Fish is not baiting right now
What do you expect diring sun solar minimum, pole flip, space weather effects ground weather, its cyclylic, do your homework!
But I watched a BSNBC clip and that's what's up!
The Sun is not at Solar Minimum (its on its way towards solar maximum).
What does a pole flip have to do with anything, especially as there is no evidence that it is flipping, just moving as it always has done.
What space weather effects change climate? None!
11-year cycles do not produce a 100-year trend.
The greatest lie since evolutionism
Ok dunning Kruger
@@theredbat5323 I'm sure he won't get that implication either! 🙄😅😂
@@theredbat5323 ?
@@michaeldeierhoi4096 ?
@@pparrker5420 Are you saying that you don't understand Dunning Kruger? I thought that was standard knowledge on UA-cam!? Anyway, you do know to search for information don't you?
If you’re an average joe why worry we can’t do anything about it billionaires are the ones responsible n can do something about it
Menos coches, más vegetales, menos hijos, más "solar," usa menos energía, compras "EVs"
Está mucho opciones con individuales contra climático cambio.
Gerard, your comment is overtly pessimistic which is the last message I would want to convey to others especially children.
Worry's like a rocking chair, it's something to do but gets nowhere