good video ! in the min 5:20 , why the faraday law equals to zero? what about the magnetic field? it's a EM wave... and why in the integral take E as a constant?
Thank you!! This video is in a sequence for electrostatics. The magnetic field term appears in a derivative with respect to time. This goes to zero for electrostatics. BTW...here is a a link to the official course website. It has links to the latest versions of the notes, videos, summary sheets, and other learning resources. empossible.net/academics/emp3302/
They are exactly the same, just that the terms are phasors instead of scalars. The magnetostatic boundary conditions are Lecture 5j here: empossible.net/academics/emp3302/
Hi, I think " These are derived from Ampere's Circuit Law and Gauss' Law. " should be changed to " These are derived from Faraday's law of induction and Gauss' Law."
Are you referring to slide 6 around 2:30? That first equation is Ampere's circuit law in integral form for electrostatics. Did I misspeak somewhere else?
Very clear explanation for dielectric to dielectric boundary condition. @15:08, If electric field cannot exist in the metal, why can we not say the normal component of the electric field in the metal is zero?
The normal component of E must be zero inside of the perfect metal. However, the normal component of E is not continuous across the interface so the normal component of E in the dielectric does not have to be zero.
Thank you , really great Video , the only resource which I was able to understand clearly and follow.
Thank you! Happy to help!
good video !
in the min 5:20 , why the faraday law equals to zero? what about the magnetic field? it's a EM wave...
and why in the integral take E as a constant?
Thank you!!
This video is in a sequence for electrostatics. The magnetic field term appears in a derivative with respect to time. This goes to zero for electrostatics.
BTW...here is a a link to the official course website. It has links to the latest versions of the notes, videos, summary sheets, and other learning resources.
empossible.net/academics/emp3302/
Great explanation. Would you please make a video on the electromagnetic Boundary Conditions?
They are exactly the same, just that the terms are phasors instead of scalars. The magnetostatic boundary conditions are Lecture 5j here:
empossible.net/academics/emp3302/
Hi, I think " These are derived from Ampere's Circuit Law and Gauss' Law. " should be changed to " These are derived from Faraday's law of induction and Gauss' Law."
Are you referring to slide 6 around 2:30? That first equation is Ampere's circuit law in integral form for electrostatics. Did I misspeak somewhere else?
@@empossible1577 I think That first equation is " Maxwell-Faraday equation " instead of "Ampere's circuit law"
wow your lectures are really good. I wish you covered the entire griffiths book
Very clear explanation for dielectric to dielectric boundary condition. @15:08, If electric field cannot exist in the metal, why can we not say the normal component of the electric field in the metal is zero?
The normal component of E must be zero inside of the perfect metal. However, the normal component of E is not continuous across the interface so the normal component of E in the dielectric does not have to be zero.
@@empossible1577 Thank you. Professor. That's very helpful.