I was stationed at Spangdahlem AFB in Germany from 1961-1964. One morning I took a short cut on the way to work and walked down a taxiway. A 5,000 gallon tank truck full of JP-4 came up from behind me and came to a very sudden stop beside me. "Want a lift?" the driver asked. Apparently the tank was not well baffled, because I can remember watching the truck rock forward and aft on the locked wheels as the fuel load sloshed into the front and rear bulkheads in turn. Quite a show. So anyway, I rode down to the flight line in style.
@@atidosamigos.8002 Apparently you do not know the difference between a theory and a hypothesis. I suspect that you also know nothing about physics, jet fuel, fuel tanks, airplanes, avionics, electronics, and a good many other subjects that this elderly person mastered long before you were born. If you don't believe that I have retained more knowledge than you will ever know, just try me on something that can't be Googled and we will see who deserves respect..
Very nice demonstration of how loaded tankers can have a higher center of gravity depending on load location as to slow your speed considerably more than otherwise centered load. Would’ve liked to learn about the tanker design.
Real life simulations are often dangerous so that's why people use virtual simulations more. Though, real life sims were still used today such as simulation car impacts on vehicles with dummy passengers to see how safety features would react to danger. You can search up videos of these car crash sims and they're pretty interesting to watch.
@@duckmaneuvers True, but the problem with simulations is that they can be highly inaccurate due to the fact that you can animate anything, even if it is impossible. But you can't break the laws of physics during physical demonstrations.
Captain Obvious Doing simulations to develop everything in real life would significantly increase R& D for many of the products that have been partly developed with virtual simulations. Note that many products, after going through many virtual simulations also go through physical ones to verify if the results from the virtual one are accurate to real life to an acceptable margin. However, not everyone can keep doing simulations in real life for testing things such as large ship structures; it’ll simply make products more expensive than need be. You know why most of the innovations came at a time of war? They didn’t care about money so they could do all the simulations and experiments to produce something without caring for cost.
@@aquillandscroll6428 I mean, you seem to be forgetting that everything that was ever developed up until the 2000s was developed via physical simulation. Computerized simulations didn't become a thing until the last 20 years.
Captain Obvious wrong, because computer simulation development occurred and in hand with the development of computers themselves. Heh, computer simulation’s most notable early use was with the Manhattan project in ww2 to model the process of a nuclear explosion. In fact, if I’m going to be specific, in 1997, 3 years before you claim of computer simulation to have started being used, the US DOD did the world’s largest military simulation. web.archive.org/web/20080122123958/www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/97/military.html Please keep saying things without backing yourself up, there’s hardly anything wrong with my prior statement as computer simulations been used in aircraft design, to see the impact of stresses on structures and etc. You just had to bring up a time span as if computer simulation hasn’t even done anything notable in that stated timespan.
I cant believe there are so many like you, commenting the exact same thing, army of mindless tools. This video is a lot older than you, what difference does it make if it was uploaded 10 years ago or 10 minutes ago?
@@AltsekBUL Because, smarty-pants, the sloshing of ten years ago is not the sloshing of today. Do you realize just how much sloshing technology has advanced? If only UA-cam had recommended this years ago, we'd have a whole different level of knowledge. Imagine, there are kids going out into the big wide world knowing absolutely nothing about sloshing! This has to change. Only UA-cam recommendations can save our youth from encountering sloshing without fore-knowledge of how it works with exciting graphics (well, here at the slosh-fanciers' club we find that exciting anyway). So next time, slosh your tongue round three times before replying. However, I think that "army of mindless tools" could become our unofficial fan name....
@@Birb_of_Judge I could've imagined..... but since I've never had such a highly appropriate place to post it, I had to jump on the opportunity, just in case you hadn't seen it!
In real life the tanker would most likely be completely full or with very little air space at the top thereby allowing very little "sloshing" on their way to the delivery location. Then after delivery the tanks would be empty, no sloshing then either.
In an ideal world, yes. Particularly if the trailer always hauls the same liquid. For example, some companies only haul water. More often, though, the trailers are used for a variety of liquids with different densities. The higher the density of the liquid, the less volume. Further, in more northern climates the road weight restrictions are often lower in spring during snow melt and higher when the ground is frozen. The more that can be hauled at once, the more profit for the transport company. Sometimes the customer only wants less than a trailer-load, and the driver delivers to several customers with one tanker. In my many years of driving tractor trailers, often with two trailers with very dense liquid fertilizer (think trailer about half full by volume), the very worst part was driving down a poorly maintained highway. The liquid tends to slosh from one side to the other, and it becomes difficult to drive straight down the road. Sometimes even dangerous, especially if the road is also icy.
When I was 20 I worked at a gas station miles from anywhere. We took weeks to empty our underground tanks, but every week or two a large refilling truck would try to unload his remaining fuel into our tanks when returning from the next town with extra fuel they couldn't fit into the tanks in that town's station (both stations owned by the same refinery). Now I understand it was for safety more than economics to avoid heading back with a third of a load. When they unloaded the excess to us, they still charged us a higher price than the station in town that the fuel was intended for. Ouch!
@@peters8758 Very interesting! My guess would be that it might be the profit. The company where I worked never even addressed tank sloshing in our mandatory safety briefings. And what's more, most of our trailers did not have any baffles.
Because it's the video you deserve, but not the one you asked right now. So you'll watch it. Because you can take it. Because it's not what you asked. It's an unrelated content, a random video. A UA-cam recommendation.
Hello, I am interested in the photo of the truck (ancient truck, 70's or 60's, I don't know) appearing on the beginning of the video, as it appears also at 1:14 and 1:35, it would be a template to make miniature trucks, so is it possible to have the source (or link) of this image ? I am especially interested in this model, I know that a research on google gives many models but this one is interesting. Thank's a lot.
Because that would be terribly inefficient, the whole purpose of a truck is to transport a large amount of product. Modern tankers do have subsets within a large tanker if that’s what you’re talking about.
I think what Ezra meant is get the proper sized container to fit the load so there's no air pockets for the liqued to slosh? The reason air pockets are left is due to the potential expanding of the liquid. Depending on what's being transported some liquid expands more than others.
The whole load may not be going to the same place, like a heating oil truck may start out with several thousand gallons, and then it delivers a few hundred gallons to ten customers throuout the day.
I have 15 years of running super tankers in Detroit MI 6 & 7 axle trailers and a few tandem but you old timers that ran the old school train tankers where some ballzey SOB I couldn't imagine that
I had a friend that was goofing off one time. He took the lid off of a tanker and sat down to fart into it. Needless to say it exploded and they found his body parts within a two mile radius. Houston, Texas 1975
@@reinoldi1097 Thank you. It is indeed so. I am looking for the name of the tv-show because I saw it as a child on TV and it fascinated me to see what the German highways were like and the concepts of road safety that it transmitted. I will keep looking for the title.
I guess engineers all over the world over the last hundred years just didn't think of that... either that or sometimes they deliver a bit here and there, thus slowly emptying the tank. Just a possibility...
The other tank sloshing video with almost 10 million views has a disabled comment section. I wonder what the millions of viewers were originally thinking of commenting?
Here from the tank sloshing simulation?
yes, I have no idea either why youtube recommended it to me.
Oh my God what is this
Yup
Comments were disabled so I came on here to read the comments about sloshing
@ haha lmao
love these old instructional clips, they sound like our tech training movies
Where can i find more like this?
henriquedelange ua-cam.com/video/1BxD66YRpVw/v-deo.html
henriquedelange ua-cam.com/video/4Rx57jVGfso/v-deo.html
Specialized 29er Ol’ Primitive Pete Lol
The original Video is from Germany maby that helps
I was stationed at Spangdahlem AFB in Germany from 1961-1964. One morning I took a short cut on the way to work and walked down a taxiway. A 5,000 gallon tank truck full of JP-4 came up from behind me and came to a very sudden stop beside me. "Want a lift?" the driver asked. Apparently the tank was not well baffled, because I can remember watching the truck rock forward and aft on the locked wheels as the fuel load sloshed into the front and rear bulkheads in turn. Quite a show. So anyway, I rode down to the flight line in style.
Tankers will always slosh at least a little bit, especially after braking
@@Handle423 they are an elderly person. Respect their theory.
Thats great.
haha tank goes brrr!
@@atidosamigos.8002 Apparently you do not know the difference between a theory and a hypothesis. I suspect that you also know nothing about physics, jet fuel, fuel tanks, airplanes, avionics, electronics, and a good many other subjects that this elderly person mastered long before you were born. If you don't believe that I have retained more knowledge than you will ever know, just try me on something that can't be Googled and we will see who deserves respect..
video quality, voice, animations, Deutsch words and old trucks... awesome.
Very nice demonstration of how loaded tankers can have a higher center of gravity depending on load location as to slow your speed considerably more than otherwise centered load. Would’ve liked to learn about the tanker design.
My right ear enjoyed this.
thanks for the distraction
props to the mad men that drove the trucks to demonstrate the problem in the real world
Thats my second tank slosh video in my recommendations in a week.
You lucky, lucky bastard!
The sounds in the background 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Wawawaeawawawawawawawaaaawweeaaaaa……
Vintage training video, nice find.
Title says tank sloshing. Didn't learn a thing about it
OL
I
o==[]::::::::::::::::o==[]:
9
L
Ah yes, back when simulations were carried out in the real world. Doesn't this mean we've been living in the new normal for quite some time now?
Real life simulations are often dangerous so that's why people use virtual simulations more.
Though, real life sims were still used today such as simulation car impacts on vehicles with dummy passengers to see how safety features would react to danger.
You can search up videos of these car crash sims and they're pretty interesting to watch.
@@duckmaneuvers True, but the problem with simulations is that they can be highly inaccurate due to the fact that you can animate anything, even if it is impossible. But you can't break the laws of physics during physical demonstrations.
Captain Obvious Doing simulations to develop everything in real life would significantly increase R& D for many of the products that have been partly developed with virtual simulations.
Note that many products, after going through many virtual simulations also go through physical ones to verify if the results from the virtual one are accurate to real life to an acceptable margin.
However, not everyone can keep doing simulations in real life for testing things such as large ship structures; it’ll simply make products more expensive than need be.
You know why most of the innovations came at a time of war? They didn’t care about money so they could do all the simulations and experiments to produce something without caring for cost.
@@aquillandscroll6428 I mean, you seem to be forgetting that everything that was ever developed up until the 2000s was developed via physical simulation. Computerized simulations didn't become a thing until the last 20 years.
Captain Obvious wrong, because computer simulation development occurred and in hand with the development of computers themselves.
Heh, computer simulation’s most notable early use was with the Manhattan project in ww2 to model the process of a nuclear explosion.
In fact, if I’m going to be specific, in 1997, 3 years before you claim of computer simulation to have started being used, the US DOD did the world’s largest military simulation. web.archive.org/web/20080122123958/www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/97/military.html
Please keep saying things without backing yourself up, there’s hardly anything wrong with my prior statement as computer simulations been used in aircraft design, to see the impact of stresses on structures and etc. You just had to bring up a time span as if computer simulation hasn’t even done anything notable in that stated timespan.
Yotutube like: >>Yeah let‘s recommend this after 10 years
I cant believe there are so many like you, commenting the exact same thing, army of mindless tools. This video is a lot older than you, what difference does it make if it was uploaded 10 years ago or 10 minutes ago?
No
why have the facts changed?
all praise the youtube algorithm
@@AltsekBUL Because, smarty-pants, the sloshing of ten years ago is not the sloshing of today. Do you realize just how much sloshing technology has advanced?
If only UA-cam had recommended this years ago, we'd have a whole different level of knowledge. Imagine, there are kids going out into the big wide world knowing absolutely nothing about sloshing! This has to change. Only UA-cam recommendations can save our youth from encountering sloshing without fore-knowledge of how it works with exciting graphics (well, here at the slosh-fanciers' club we find that exciting anyway).
So next time, slosh your tongue round three times before replying.
However, I think that "army of mindless tools" could become our unofficial fan name....
I love the demo drivers - big windows all around, low back seat, no seat belts, just going at it. Obviously 1970s or older video.
tank sloshing simulation videos
Nobody:
11 million people: Interesting
1.1 mil
@@JPOfAwesomeness haha, I was referring to the previous recommended for a lot of people
@@JPOfAwesomeness since comments are blocked...
Kevin Martínez oh the truck sloshing simulation? I saw that lmao.
Kevin Martínez funny.
Me: Watch a tank video once
UA-cam: OH SO YOU LIKE WATCHING TRUCKS
🤣good one brooo
Can't imagine how funny would be being a test driver like the ones in the video, being paid to do damages.
Fuck u
@@omniyambot9876 adjust your low IQ
@@yournightmare9999 you're an idiot, I smell it.
@Loli4lyf at least I'm cooler u stupidfuck.
What is going on with the replys
I liked the baffles in the other sloshing simulation video.
I don't know why I clicked on this video
But i did
And I don't regret it
As a water tanker driver I enjoy a good tank slosh
Perfect way to start my day is this recommended video right here
I really like the ominous background music
Why am I learning how to drive a tanker truck at 3am when I should be sleeping.
I see I am not the only one who UA-cam wanted to watch an old german training video with English dub.
You'll absolutely love this one:
ua-cam.com/video/TJYOkZz6Dck/v-deo.html
@@joepublic3933 you really think I didn't know this absolute Classic?
@@Birb_of_Judge I could've imagined..... but since I've never had such a highly appropriate place to post it, I had to jump on the opportunity, just in case you hadn't seen it!
@@joepublic3933 all good
Can someone tell me what the music is? I'd like to buy the full album.
This killed me
recommended comments was turned off. Came here to vent my anger at this .
Never mind. There's popcorn further up the comments if you like.
I want to watch the whole series.
Sloshing? no wonder I fall down when drinking a ton! the liquid in my stomach has inertia!
Roflmao!
I enjoyed reading that in Mr. Potato's voice.
A salute for all those engineers that came up with Dampers...
Well done retro video.
I havent hauled sanitary tanks in awhile and i can still feel the slosh.
That's probably just what you ate for dinner.
In real life the tanker would most likely be completely full or with very little air space at the top thereby allowing very little "sloshing" on their way to the delivery location. Then after delivery the tanks would be empty, no sloshing then either.
In an ideal world, yes. Particularly if the trailer always hauls the same liquid. For example, some companies only haul water. More often, though, the trailers are used for a variety of liquids with different densities. The higher the density of the liquid, the less volume. Further, in more northern climates the road weight restrictions are often lower in spring during snow melt and higher when the ground is frozen. The more that can be hauled at once, the more profit for the transport company. Sometimes the customer only wants less than a trailer-load, and the driver delivers to several customers with one tanker. In my many years of driving tractor trailers, often with two trailers with very dense liquid fertilizer (think trailer about half full by volume), the very worst part was driving down a poorly maintained highway. The liquid tends to slosh from one side to the other, and it becomes difficult to drive straight down the road. Sometimes even dangerous, especially if the road is also icy.
When I was 20 I worked at a gas station miles from anywhere. We took weeks to empty our underground tanks, but every week or two a large refilling truck would try to unload his remaining fuel into our tanks when returning from the next town with extra fuel they couldn't fit into the tanks in that town's station (both stations owned by the same refinery). Now I understand it was for safety more than economics to avoid heading back with a third of a load. When they unloaded the excess to us, they still charged us a higher price than the station in town that the fuel was intended for. Ouch!
@@peters8758 Very interesting! My guess would be that it might be the profit. The company where I worked never even addressed tank sloshing in our mandatory safety briefings. And what's more, most of our trailers did not have any baffles.
Because it's the video you deserve, but not the one you asked right now.
So you'll watch it. Because you can take it.
Because it's not what you asked.
It's an unrelated content, a random video.
A UA-cam recommendation.
Hello,
I am interested in the photo of the truck (ancient truck, 70's or 60's, I don't know) appearing on the beginning of the video, as it appears also at 1:14 and 1:35, it would be a template to make miniature trucks, so is it possible to have the source (or link) of this image ?
I am especially interested in this model, I know that a research on google gives many models but this one is interesting.
Thank's a lot.
Always wondered the math involved in this since I was a kid
Dpxxed
Really? During that time I was wondering how to get girls...
joe public lol bet you still don’t have one :) jk
@@muttBunch No.... that's why I'm watching videos about sloshing. Thought that was obvious. No need to rub it in...
Acoustic02 _ which involves math :p
You gotta love the UA-cam recommendation system
So, why wouldn't the fluid be stored in a smaller container, so it doesn't slosh?
Because that would be terribly inefficient, the whole purpose of a truck is to transport a large amount of product. Modern tankers do have subsets within a large tanker if that’s what you’re talking about.
I think what Ezra meant is get the proper sized container to fit the load so there's no air pockets for the liqued to slosh? The reason air pockets are left is due to the potential expanding of the liquid. Depending on what's being transported some liquid expands more than others.
The whole load may not be going to the same place, like a heating oil truck may start out with several thousand gallons, and then it delivers a few hundred gallons to ten customers throuout the day.
Why did UA-cam recommend this to me after a decade?
Keeping your recommendations list fresh that’s why.
Why not?
UA-cam insisted on me watching this
And you obliged.
'
what year was this old film...
germany made very good unimog truck
This is the first time that an information video sounds more dangerous and menacing to me rather in English, than in German
I have 15 years of running super tankers in Detroit MI 6 & 7 axle trailers and a few tandem but you old timers that ran the old school train tankers where some ballzey SOB I couldn't imagine that
I don't have a truck , but loved watching it. Now I want a truck 😒
They don't make old information videos like this anymore.
Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
Porque youtube me recomienda vídeos de camiones con tanques de agua?, pero aún peor porque los veo?
UA-cam recommended me after 10 yrs
Though if it was recommended before, i was like mad ass
Came for the comments, stayed for the sound effects
back when Mercedes Benz was ran by engineers they were way ahead from the world
ideal for learning russia drivers and brazilian
The animation is really interesting
this is way older than "10 years"
That is only the upload date.
My right ear enjoyed this video
my right ear enjoyed the video
Did they pull the soundtrack from Night of The Living Dead? Anyway, tank sloshing sounds insidious.
Do you have the full video..
Can you upload the full video?
This is like a horror movie made it by an engineer
why r the comments of the other video disabled?
A tanker unfer full braking will still move forward due to the splashing...why this is not mention? Plus the title is off.. its more of COG of trucks.
My left ear is feeling lonely.
are you not hearing anything from the left audio or something? weird
Meet you guys in another 10years...
They should teach these things to all truck drivers so they would drive more carefully.
I think they probably do actually.
feels like im watching something from fallout 3 or 4
what happens if you fill up the tank, i mean it's only half full!
Everyday there are countless professional truck drivers set out to prove the laws of physics are flaw.
hey guys,welcome to the another episode of random youtube video reccomendations
Essential viewing for James Cameron before he made The Terminator
how old is this vid
You shouldn't ask it's not polite.
I started this night watching Gordon Ramsay and somehow ended here
Per chance a slosh enhancer is in order (could work wonders). Cheers!
Me voy a dormir, yo a las 2AM viendo este vídeo
Is this what 1000 hours of Truck Driving Simulator gets me?
patience: once you've finished your second thousand hours, you get new skin options.
My right ear really enjoyed it
Since comments are turned off on the other sloshing video, lets use this comment section to discuss it.
The background "music" is stress inducing.
It's not as bad as they say it is I pulled a tanker for 27 years
I almost forgot to watch it today.
so how do people find tank sloshing interesting?
I want to see the rest of this video
this sounds like realy good horor
I had a friend that was goofing off one time. He took the lid off of a tanker and sat down to fart into it. Needless to say it exploded and they found his body parts within a two mile radius.
Houston, Texas 1975
Wait, what??
How did I get here? The simulation is *baffling*.
I didnt search for this, at all. But it is interesting
Ни...я не понятно, но очень интересно!!!!
Please, what is the name of this German TV show?
i think that is more an education video
ua-cam.com/video/9-DgM0VvfLc/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/MwDWGdHTEcI/v-deo.html
@@reinoldi1097 Thank you. It is indeed so. I am looking for the name of the tv-show because I saw it as a child on TV and it fascinated me to see what the German highways were like and the concepts of road safety that it transmitted. I will keep looking for the title.
Random video from ten years ago
UA-cam recommend
Please make a video explain this video
why are all these comments so recent??
Because we all discreetly followed you here.
the bgm kinda creeps me out
I see a truck , I see a land missile.
du hast einen Deutschen Kommentar gefunden. Glückwunsch
Jawohl
Why don’t they fill it up enough so that it doesn’t slosh!?
I guess engineers all over the world over the last hundred years just didn't think of that... either that or sometimes they deliver a bit here and there, thus slowly emptying the tank. Just a possibility...
How did I get here?
Dude in the yellow Benz truck drives like a psychopath.
These clips remind me of Howard starks 🙂
The other tank sloshing video with almost 10 million views has a disabled comment section. I wonder what the millions of viewers were originally thinking of commenting?
Exactly what they've commented here. That's why we're all here.
Warum ist das Video Deutsch, aber der Ton nicht?
Bruh, for a second, I thought my left earphone broke.
UA-cam recommendations surprise me yet again : )
Sounds like a faces of death movie