Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

What Does THE SHINING's Final Image Actually Mean?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 бер 2018
  • "I'm sorry to differ with you, sir, but you are the caretaker. You have always been the caretaker."
    For more awesome content, check out: whatculture.com/
    Follow us on Facebook at: / whatculture
    Catch us on Twitter: / whatculture

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,5 тис.

  • @stricknine8623
    @stricknine8623 6 років тому +7503

    Remember the line..."sir you have always been here"
    Its confirmation of that.

    • @sweetbabytrae
      @sweetbabytrae 6 років тому +281

      Strick nine maybe that was just part of the hotel’s manipulation of Jack, start playing mind games with him so he starts believing it

    • @julioalves6965
      @julioalves6965 6 років тому +102

      I think in that way too. Now Jack Is part of the hotel.

    • @jennytrejo5696
      @jennytrejo5696 6 років тому +89

      Or ill sell my soul for a drink n loyd appears

    • @AlpineStudiosInc
      @AlpineStudiosInc 5 років тому +147

      He's there for the continental breakfast lol

    • @bernardogodines1240
      @bernardogodines1240 5 років тому +33

      @@AlpineStudiosInc lol key and peele. Hilarious skit.

  • @franciscarriere6191
    @franciscarriere6191 5 років тому +1971

    He sold his soul at the bar and from that moment he became possessed by the same evil who took those before. The picture shows that his soul is now trapped inside the hotel.

    • @-MrRichBiker1967
      @-MrRichBiker1967 3 роки тому +79

      Best explaination of the movie, by far, good job, ty!

    • @-MrRichBiker1967
      @-MrRichBiker1967 3 роки тому +79

      'What shall it be, Mr Torrance?"
      "well.....Loyd...give me the dog that bit me"
      ok....Bourbon on the rocks"
      ( see how the bartender, loyd already knew, what he wanted to drink-give away)

    • @carlostejada1479
      @carlostejada1479 3 роки тому +13

      and why 1921 year??

    • @BasedNj
      @BasedNj 2 роки тому +2

      @@carlostejada1479 idk it’s a mind fu**

    • @carlostejada1479
      @carlostejada1479 2 роки тому +14

      @@BasedNj
      it's 100 years from now 2021///1921

  • @Rougarou99
    @Rougarou99 4 роки тому +5443

    Can we all agree that Shelly Duvall gave an astounding performance!

    • @617sasso
      @617sasso 4 роки тому +370

      Kubrick put her through hell. Her mental health is a serious concern. She is not well. Sad really.

    • @theanalyst1751
      @theanalyst1751 4 роки тому +41

      Sasso really sad 😔

    • @Bred2fight4
      @Bred2fight4 4 роки тому +161

      They royally fucked her up. In fact some of the things they did is borderline abuse

    • @Bred2fight4
      @Bred2fight4 4 роки тому +135

      @bred toaster yeah. And at the expense of her well being and sanity. Have you seen the way she looks and talks now?

    • @jrt2007gjdje
      @jrt2007gjdje 4 роки тому +100

      one of the worst performances I have ever seen. She even got nominated for the Razzie Awards 1981 for that very performance.

  • @Gunner192
    @Gunner192 2 роки тому +198

    This was completely covered in the book. The hotel was alive but lived outside space/time continuum. If you exist in it's realm at one time, you exist in it at all times. When Jack died, the hotel accepted Jack into it's realm. Even though he was accepted in 1977 in time as we know it, he now exists in it in 1921 as well.

    • @KayInMaine
      @KayInMaine 10 місяців тому +2

      Does that mean all in that photo died at one time in the hotel? 😮

    • @shojaejlali1290
      @shojaejlali1290 10 місяців тому

      I thought the shining was '80 not '77

    • @Gunner192
      @Gunner192 9 місяців тому +4

      @@shojaejlali1290 movie may be '80. Book was 1977.

    • @Gunner192
      @Gunner192 9 місяців тому +1

      @@KayInMaine I believe so, yes.

    • @KayInMaine
      @KayInMaine 9 місяців тому

      Gotcha. Makes sense. @@Gunner192

  • @Jo-chilin
    @Jo-chilin 6 років тому +9852

    I always just thought that it meant that he’s trapped there, forever a part of the hotel

    • @Goremeister100
      @Goremeister100 6 років тому +202

      yeah but why 1921?

    • @theman2385
      @theman2385 6 років тому +611

      Because that day in 1921 was the Hotels energy High point. Therefore all the spirits are goading him to join them in their eternal party. Boredom is not nearly an incentive as a fun never ending party. I've seen this hotel, and if your in Estes Park when winter hits, you aren't leaving for 6 months.

    • @nerthus4685
      @nerthus4685 6 років тому +531

      The date is irrelevant. He is just another victim of the hotel. Trapped with the rest of them.

    • @gabrielowens8607
      @gabrielowens8607 6 років тому +24

      Me too

    • @bilalahmed2123
      @bilalahmed2123 6 років тому +19

      I agree

  • @MuzikFreak161
    @MuzikFreak161 4 роки тому +4306

    I have a theory that the hotel adds new faces of its victims in the form of a group photo from long time ago. Like a trophy.

    • @74jailbreaker
      @74jailbreaker 4 роки тому +296

      Makes you wonder how many people in that photo before Jack were a victim. Spooky stuff!

    • @dentistjohn3223
      @dentistjohn3223 4 роки тому +91

      Ahhh I like that theory

    • @gennaroponsiglione1098
      @gennaroponsiglione1098 4 роки тому +121

      I think so too, jack dying as a murderer in the overlook hotel became one of its ghosts

    • @justinhayes2194
      @justinhayes2194 4 роки тому +69

      So do you think the new victims take Jack's place in the photo? Like Jack just becomes one of the guests after the new "caretaker" has sold their soul to the hotel? Or not...

    • @gennaroponsiglione1098
      @gennaroponsiglione1098 4 роки тому +11

      @@justinhayes2194 something like that

  • @brickfirst2604
    @brickfirst2604 4 роки тому +3159

    For me, this is the greatest horror movie ever.

    • @ktongmm
      @ktongmm 4 роки тому +44

      Yeah I love this movie

    • @gretaciotola4470
      @gretaciotola4470 4 роки тому +33

      I totally agree

    • @Fuzzymanboob
      @Fuzzymanboob 4 роки тому +10

      Based

    • @SamSung-nf6tr
      @SamSung-nf6tr 4 роки тому +23

      Most people agree.
      I hate gore & zombies

    • @torinio
      @torinio 4 роки тому +33

      I liked it at first but after reading the book the film is awful in comparison they changed it too much and very few of the changes were good

  • @Dan_Ben_Michael
    @Dan_Ben_Michael 4 роки тому +202

    I feel that the photo at the end suggests Jack’s spirit is now tied to the hotel.
    I also would like to add that the bathroom scene with Delbert Grady is so chilling. He goes from the obliging bathroom attendant to sinister killer so quickly when he speaks of “correcting” his wife and daughters.

  • @jimbertido7762
    @jimbertido7762 6 років тому +1442

    I think it symbolized how he became part of the hotel for eternity, like all the other victims, murderers, ghosts.

    • @crazboy84
      @crazboy84 5 років тому +21

      This was always my take. Jack wasnt part of the hotel until the events of the film, but time as the good Doctor says is wibbly wobbly.

    • @Jimii89
      @Jimii89 5 років тому +6

      Thats what i got out of it. I think this video is incorrect.

    • @GrumpyGrndad
      @GrumpyGrndad 4 роки тому +10

      Exactly how i always thought about it. He died there doing horrible things and now he is trapped there too.

    • @mitzicoleman7187
      @mitzicoleman7187 4 роки тому +1

      That’s what I thought to.

    • @sethkale5031
      @sethkale5031 4 роки тому +3

      Yes. And to be honest I felt it was fairly obvious. Whenever I hear other theories I get confused as if I’m not thinking more abstractly.

  • @TheMosinCrate
    @TheMosinCrate 6 років тому +2646

    I thought the ending was pretty clear. Even the ghosts tell you. Mr.Torrance has always been there. He always comes back. Clearly he was attached to the hotel and every generation of a different life he gets guided back there and the slaughter is repeated.

    • @harryo6126
      @harryo6126 6 років тому +30

      agreed

    • @rivenix5934
      @rivenix5934 6 років тому +44

      Indeed. That was one hell of a long intro just to get the point where the answer is tossed on our lap by the very director.

    • @metacosmos
      @metacosmos 5 років тому +11

      IF kUBRICK WANTED TO DO A MOVIE ON THE BAD RELATIONSHIPS inside the human family , failed father against brilliant son, then the presence of torrance at the last image means that this family problem comes from the beginning of times and will follow ever. it happenend too in the Moon Watcher family.

    • @earthangel6858
      @earthangel6858 5 років тому +3

      Makes sense to me

    • @AjeshAlvoor
      @AjeshAlvoor 5 років тому +5

      How can a Ghost raise a family then??

  • @Open11Sky
    @Open11Sky 4 роки тому +2402

    Doctor Sleep confirms that Jack's soul is trapped in the hotel.

    • @doriis009
      @doriis009 4 роки тому +31

      Sorry, I don't really know much about these movies/books, is that a sort of sequel?

    • @UmBelenense
      @UmBelenense 4 роки тому +51

      @@doriis009 yes

    • @TengkuAmier
      @TengkuAmier 4 роки тому +37

      @@doriis009 all the books is connected read the dark tower

    • @onnixcarmichele3911
      @onnixcarmichele3911 4 роки тому +23

      I love pens
      Yeah, definitely read it. But whatever you do, don’t watch the horrible film adaptation 😂

    • @High_Monk
      @High_Monk 4 роки тому +65

      @@onnixcarmichele3911 I watched it, it wasn't terrible. Just really bad. Also imo people should watch anything that would catch their interest. As a kid I used to watch really bad horror movies, that's how I learned to appreciate the actually good ones.

  • @cleonRIP
    @cleonRIP 4 роки тому +500

    My buddy said it best. Eventually, everyone joins the party

  • @natalierodriguez2288
    @natalierodriguez2288 5 років тому +1782

    In the movie, jack says. I’d give my God damned soul for a drink. I think the. Picture is an illustration of jack selling his soul to the hotel and it’s evil and now he’s trapped forever.

    • @Mark-ix4zt
      @Mark-ix4zt 5 років тому +96

      Kubrick is a fu**ing genius, he left it so that the viewer has to interpret it their own way. So basically, we will really never find a logical answer.

    • @tonycap49
      @tonycap49 4 роки тому +44

      That's what I think. It's at this point that Jack is completely taken over, and then all the people in the ballroom appear, and also Mr. Grady, who Jack seems to know.

    • @Mark-ix4zt
      @Mark-ix4zt 4 роки тому +6

      Shit! I would have never noticed that

    • @HeavenlyRaven1978
      @HeavenlyRaven1978 4 роки тому +45

      I mean come on Jack says he'd give his damned soul for a drink. Then a bartender in "red jacket" appears with more liquor than any former alcoholic could stand. And tells him "Mister Torrance" his credit is always good. Temptation is a dangerous thing 😡

    • @tonycap49
      @tonycap49 4 роки тому

      marco tanne why not?

  • @kryptos5208
    @kryptos5208 6 років тому +1207

    Truly a masterpiece. The genius of Kubrick is he left it to the viewer to interpret. There is no wrong answer.

    • @ankihansen2489
      @ankihansen2489 5 років тому +18

      The problem started when he talked about the ending, he explained that it was about reincarnation.

    • @cleveque
      @cleveque 5 років тому +41

      That's actually called "laziness". A director has an ending in mind and tries to put it on the screen. Many try to be subtle, with the result that the message doesn't come through. Then they realize that they did a bad job of expressing the ending so they say "it's open to interpretation" because it keeps the viewer from pointing out that their ending doesn't follow from the circumstances of the movie.
      Having an ending that's ambiguous is fine, if the alternatives follow from the facts of the movie. None of these theories do, so putting the 1921 photo in is really something that should be under "goofs" on its imdb page.

    • @scallen3841
      @scallen3841 5 років тому +6

      This version is different from the original book

    • @chrissplitter2915
      @chrissplitter2915 5 років тому +20

      Stephen King actually hated the movie. Stanley basically gave him the finger and went on his way.

    • @thimitrakipreou1800
      @thimitrakipreou1800 5 років тому

      @@cleveque agree👍

  • @crippledcrusader1321
    @crippledcrusader1321 4 роки тому +838

    The photo probably represents all the people who died in the hotel, and he is the newest guest.

    • @hextermorgan1478
      @hextermorgan1478 4 роки тому +17

      Maybe. But why the year 1921?

    • @crippledcrusader1321
      @crippledcrusader1321 4 роки тому +13

      Bruce Payne probably the year the hotel opened.

    • @chandrachud
      @chandrachud 4 роки тому +30

      @@crippledcrusader1321 that was 1909.

    • @crippledcrusader1321
      @crippledcrusader1321 4 роки тому +5

      Chandrachud Das eh, I just think it’s a neat idea. Adds to the whole mystery of the hotel.

    • @kevindunn3541
      @kevindunn3541 3 роки тому +5

      The guy with his hand on Jack's shoulder in the photo is Woodrow Wilson apparently

  • @brianandrew9594
    @brianandrew9594 3 роки тому +61

    I’m here on July 4, 2021 … the 100th Anniversary

  • @VidzOnComputer
    @VidzOnComputer 6 років тому +3517

    The hotel is a depository of souls and the last picture shows the trophys that it has accumulated.

    • @picvan
      @picvan 6 років тому +211

      That's what I've always thought. He's now one of them.

    • @FutureReference
      @FutureReference 6 років тому +69

      Cindy Jones for me that is what I take it’s claimed him and that’s the trophy cabinet and it has him forever

    • @CrazyFoo501
      @CrazyFoo501 6 років тому +40

      the gist of what I always thought
      Gooble Gobble Gooble Gobble One of Us

    • @jacecase2000
      @jacecase2000 6 років тому +64

      In the book, you realize the hotel is trying to claim Danny the whole time. The movie was altered so that this focus was of anyone who died therein.

    • @josebillyb.a.8128
      @josebillyb.a.8128 6 років тому +15

      That’s how I always felt about it , plus he made movies so different in scenes and actions that unless he was alive to tell us thought process we will never know , but will debate it

  • @VoiceOfTheEmperor
    @VoiceOfTheEmperor 6 років тому +2979

    It means that the hotel has claimed another soul. The photo(s) are/is its trophy room. Those are all the souls that it has claimed and they now are stuck in the hotel, forever bound to the cursed place.

    • @alexandrerodrigues9844
      @alexandrerodrigues9844 6 років тому +158

      Best theory yet. And probably the correct one.

    • @RollingxBigshot
      @RollingxBigshot 6 років тому +63

      VoiceOfTheEmperor that’s what I always thought

    • @maliksiegstad649
      @maliksiegstad649 6 років тому +48

      But the hotel was build ready in 1909. How many people are there in the picture? It doesn't really make sense that so many people died in the hotel without it is mentioned.

    • @leyendasdecassete9085
      @leyendasdecassete9085 6 років тому +43

      VoiceOfTheEmperor but the black guy, isn't in the picture.. it's a good theory thought.

    • @troywinston
      @troywinston 6 років тому +16

      This is the one theory I've (read) heard that really makes the most sense. That actually makes the movie even better for me. Thanks.

  • @luvdomus
    @luvdomus 4 роки тому +73

    When you commit murder in the hotel or are a victim of murder in it you are fated to become a a permanent part of the hotel's history. As the twins say, "Come play with us... forever and ever and ever."

  • @officialkxngr3v
    @officialkxngr3v 4 роки тому +162

    Does anybody have the suspicion that jacks character might also have the shining? Alcohol was a way the spirits dull out those who shine. The drink drinks you. Doctor sleep leaves alot of clues to whats going on.

    • @captainlou9677
      @captainlou9677 3 роки тому +44

      Yes, Jack has it. He's not aware of it. That's why he drinks. To turn off his sensitivity to the world. Danny does the same thing when he gets older.

    • @SarahSkinnyJeans
      @SarahSkinnyJeans 3 роки тому +6

      Brilliant. That makes a lot of sense to me tbh

    • @maggiesmith856
      @maggiesmith856 2 роки тому +20

      Wendy also has a trace of it, which is why she is able to see spirits when the hotel has grown strong towards the end. Danny is so powerful because he inherited his power from both parents.

    • @justineharper3346
      @justineharper3346 2 роки тому +4

      That would explain why Danny and Abbra both have it. In the books they confirm that he actually is her uncle. Her mom is his half sister by Jack, so they both could have inherited the shine from him

    • @bigc5467
      @bigc5467 2 роки тому +3

      So was Lloyd Jack’s father?

  • @bingobongo4906
    @bingobongo4906 6 років тому +2288

    i always thought the buttler was the devil and the end movie image was him in hell and that was a photo of previous people who made deals with the devil

    • @thedeathwatcher6571
      @thedeathwatcher6571 5 років тому +146

      Good theory, good one.

    • @MW3NZ3L
      @MW3NZ3L 5 років тому +102

      Sounds even darker and more epic :)

    • @melz6126
      @melz6126 5 років тому +33

      That’s what I thought too!!

    • @ToxicQueen2787
      @ToxicQueen2787 5 років тому +211

      He even said He would give his soul for a drink and he had a drink

    • @welhynole4082
      @welhynole4082 5 років тому +51

      He’s doing the as above so below pose in the picture. Same pose as the satanic baphomet

  • @Dudz_007
    @Dudz_007 4 роки тому +425

    The book hints towards the hotel itself being alive. So it wouldn’t be unreasonable to suggest that the hotel added him to that picture on the wall once Jack died while doing the hotels bidding.

    • @summerof0418
      @summerof0418 2 роки тому +6

      Hmmmm, that’s a good theory right there.

    • @Gunner192
      @Gunner192 2 роки тому +19

      It doesn't hint, it specifically states it. The hotel is alive but exists in a realm outside of time as we know it. Once you exist in the hotels realm at any time, you exist in it at all time. The hotel as a living entity was conjured into existence during great party the night of July 4th, 1921. When the hotel looks into our world & time as we know it, it does so through a window of July 4th 1921.

    • @LouSassoleSledgecock
      @LouSassoleSledgecock Рік тому

      It would be unreasonable because hotels aren’t living things, you idiot.

    • @willmurray1518
      @willmurray1518 Рік тому

      @@Gunner192 Agree. Also a very Stephen King vehicle - the thing is possessed, and multi-dimensional. Like It, the Tommyknockers, Needful Things, etc.

    • @Captain-Cosmo
      @Captain-Cosmo 11 місяців тому +2

      But the film is NOT the novel. For Kubrick, it was merely a jumping off point.

  • @boah1668
    @boah1668 4 роки тому +55

    I feel so lucky being one of the people who watched it in the teathers back in 1980. I was just 9 years old and it was one of the best things i've experienced and 39 years later I still can't feel the same emotion i felt with that movie

    • @lawrencejelsma8118
      @lawrencejelsma8118 4 роки тому +7

      I watched it at a retro movie theater in college (including A Clockwork Orange, 2001 A Space Odyssey, Full Metal Jacket, etc.) Theater studies in films by masters, especially Stanley Kubrick films ... Owned it by buying it on DVD!

    • @ConsidertheCrows
      @ConsidertheCrows 3 роки тому +4

      It seemed like it was on TV every week in the 1980s.

    • @JoseFranco-yr1rn
      @JoseFranco-yr1rn Рік тому +1

      Awwe

  • @111Phoenix777
    @111Phoenix777 4 роки тому +283

    I've always felt that there was more to that picture at the end than just Jack Torrance being front and center. There's something very odd about that picture.

    • @AmandaHugandKiss411
      @AmandaHugandKiss411 3 роки тому +32

      Agreed, I posted a comment earlier about what I noticed about that picture...it is unsettling for a number of reasons

    • @fionn8265
      @fionn8265 3 роки тому +4

      @@AmandaHugandKiss411 what other reasons

    • @TheCassiusMorrisShow
      @TheCassiusMorrisShow 3 роки тому +4

      This

    • @andria8279
      @andria8279 3 роки тому +4

      @@fionn8265 his smile...

    • @andria8279
      @andria8279 3 роки тому +2

      @Cyrus Mountolugo I wanna know... when I saw that picture I was about to turn the movie off

  • @christopherhazel2837
    @christopherhazel2837 5 років тому +673

    The book helped me understand the movie. To me, one of the greatest movies of all time, especially because of the performance of Jack Nicholson. Classic.

    • @saurabhbisht2668
      @saurabhbisht2668 5 років тому +10

      So what does it actually mean?

    • @giampaolomannucci8281
      @giampaolomannucci8281 5 років тому +32

      @@saurabhbisht2668 it means: read the book

    • @williamgreer1824
      @williamgreer1824 4 роки тому +35

      The book helped you to understand the movie? The movie was a piece of crap because Kubrick refused to let King write the screenplay opting instead for his own ridiculous ideas. The movie doesn’t reflect the book in any way, shape or form. Jack Nicholson is so over the top from frame 1 his performance becomes no more than a caricature resembling the Joker.

    • @SkyePhoenix
      @SkyePhoenix 4 роки тому +14

      Shelley Duvall was fantastic as well.

    • @josephcontreras8930
      @josephcontreras8930 4 роки тому +6

      Yes classic book on its own and a classic movie on its own. They made a tv movie screen written by King himself w Steven Weber as jack and Rebecca demornay. And Dean Stockwell as the lead ghost well it just wasn't the same Steven used a croquet mallet and he doesn't watch the boilers and the hotel explodes in the end

  • @sharonmedeiros9819
    @sharonmedeiros9819 6 років тому +1376

    I don't think he was reincarnated. I think that he was someone who had murderous tendencies to begin with, and the hotel could sense his weaknesses and use them to slowly drive him insane. Then the evil murderous spirit that existed there took over and possessed him. The photo symbolised the fact that he had become one of them and was absorbed into it, to join the ranks as yet another evil spirit that would continue to influence those living to murder and make the hotel stronger.

    • @oliviav.3565
      @oliviav.3565 6 років тому +49

      Sharon DeMedeiros thank you for explaining the ending without all the needless complex BS.

    • @thykingdomcomethywillbedon9359
      @thykingdomcomethywillbedon9359 6 років тому +14

      Sharon DeMedeiros Yeah he was always crazy

    • @sharonmedeiros9819
      @sharonmedeiros9819 6 років тому +88

      Don't forget, he had already hit Danny in the past, in a drunken rage. His violent tendencies were already within him. The hotel used them...

    • @jcarlovitch
      @jcarlovitch 6 років тому +27

      Taekwon. Kubrick is guessing. He did not write the book and Stephen King never explained it.

    • @jcarlovitch
      @jcarlovitch 6 років тому +19

      I was replying to your comment about reincarnation. No where in the book did it mention reincarnation nor did Stephen King ever explain the meaning. He wanted people to interpret it their own way and reincarnation was Kubrick's interpretation.

  • @henrikswanstrom9218
    @henrikswanstrom9218 2 роки тому +34

    I always interpreted it as signaling that Jack now was a part of the hotel.
    That anytime someone is claimed by the house, they're added to the photographs.
    This would assume that he wasn't on the photograph when they first moved in there.
    But now after death he's a part of the hotel and will be one of the ghosts there.

  • @maggiesmith856
    @maggiesmith856 2 роки тому +22

    I think the photo is a symbolic way to show that Jack has become one of the spirits haunting the Overlook, where it is always 1921.

  • @samuelburdette1774
    @samuelburdette1774 6 років тому +1652

    Jack is Jack. When he enters the hotel however he is instantly possessed by the ghost. We then see him as the murderous caretaker back in the 20's the whole movie. You never know what Jack actually looks like. In the beginning of the movie, it's only the car we see going down the road. We first see him already in the hotel and Jack has now been possessed by the ghost. We never actually get to see what Jack really looks like. We are watching the man in the picture use Jack's body throughout the movie. Unbeknownst to us until we see him in that 1920's picture in the end.

    • @AaronAlert77
      @AaronAlert77 5 років тому +84

      Samuel Burdette I like this

    • @Ciclopea2
      @Ciclopea2 5 років тому +101

      This makes the most sense to me.

    • @th3gps223
      @th3gps223 5 років тому +160

      Your "Jack was possessed from the moment he set foot in the hotel" theory could make sense, if Jack didn't act like a relatively normal person initially and take quite a long time to actually become crazy. The whole point of the scene where Jack is screaming in agony and says "I must be losing my mind" is to highlight that Jack is still himself, and fighting to keep it that way.

    • @samuelburdette1774
      @samuelburdette1774 5 років тому +82

      TH3GPS excellent point. However, just because we see Jack as the spirit doesn't mean it had control yet. It had only made the connection. And as you stated, Jack was only relatively normal. We first see him with his family in the car after he had entered the hotel. He was most definitely a bit odd with Danny and Wendy in that scene. Especially the, "See? He saw it on the television", line. Of course he tried to fight it, but it was inevitable that he would be overtaken. The whole point of showing us the picture in the end was to inform us we were watching the spirit inside Jack the entire movie.

    • @th3gps223
      @th3gps223 5 років тому +35

      Well that could be just how he acts. I mean we're talking about a guy who dislocated his son's arm in a drunken state not too long ago. I don't think it's too much of a stretch to say that he was just an odd guy to begin with.

  • @natepeace1737
    @natepeace1737 4 роки тому +359

    How King could not like this film is baffling. A true masterpiece.

    • @evancain4906
      @evancain4906 3 роки тому +11

      @Nate Peace. Nice profile pic HAL

    • @joes3844
      @joes3844 3 роки тому +42

      The book was way better

    • @RC-fi8nn
      @RC-fi8nn 3 роки тому +48

      Film is great, but the book is so much better.

    • @charliegenis4228
      @charliegenis4228 3 роки тому +31

      The film made a lot of changes and I think Kubrick may have insulted King's original novel. Not sure but I think I heard that.

    • @alejandroalba391
      @alejandroalba391 3 роки тому +12

      Read the book

  • @lancehewison
    @lancehewison 4 роки тому +37

    It always seemed to me that it isn’t the hotel that is inherently evil, but that it is a kind of energetic field that magnifies the inner darkness of its visitors. Like a hallucinogenic drug experience, it draws to the surface what is already there. Wendy is the most naive, so she picks up on this last. Jack does not arrive to the hotel innocent, as possible violent/sexual abuse by his hands is referenced. This is why he is most strongly affected in an evil sense. For Danny, the hotel allows the trauma he has suffered to become fully realized. He has compartmentalized and temporarily blocked the memory of his trauma through disassociation (talking to himself, the invention of his imaginary friend Tony).
    In short, one could say the the hotel brings to life an esoteric, demonic force, together with its real-life consequences, that the unconscious mind desperately attempts to suppress out of denial.
    Jack suppresses his own transgressions. Danny suppresses the abuse he has suffered. Wendy suppresses the guilt she has for staying with an abuser. They are psychically locked in a recurring pattern that must be broken.

  • @BlewJ
    @BlewJ 6 років тому +1106

    I always just thought the house broke him down, used him, and then entrapped him forever.

    • @randallbrooks5787
      @randallbrooks5787 6 років тому +29

      *Hotel, not house :)

    • @BlewJ
      @BlewJ 6 років тому +19

      Right you are.

    • @randallbrooks5787
      @randallbrooks5787 6 років тому +21

      And, ditto! Always nice to see someone else who "gets" the simple ending of this movie! :)

    • @MilwaukeeF40C
      @MilwaukeeF40C 6 років тому +7

      No, that was his marriage.

    • @jemstar3388
      @jemstar3388 6 років тому +13

      That’s what I thought he just became part of the hotel as a trapped soul that’s why he was in the photo.

  • @thehappychatter
    @thehappychatter 6 років тому +123

    I think the ending just means, once Jack’s dead, like Mr. Grady, he’s now a part of the hotel. He’s now a part of the party that’s been going on since 1921.

    • @thehappychatter
      @thehappychatter 6 років тому +1

      Pappy Tron yes, but typos are funny.

    • @djrxmx
      @djrxmx 6 років тому

      Perfect conclusion. I like it. Makes good sense.

    • @helenmorcom7530
      @helenmorcom7530 6 років тому

      Yes...But

    • @rafaelnunez1610
      @rafaelnunez1610 6 років тому

      Yeah it’s cool and shit but why the chef is not in the picture? I mean... He also died in the hotel 🤔..

    • @JohnDoe-qd7gh
      @JohnDoe-qd7gh 6 років тому +2

      Rafael Nuñez but he wasn't possessed

  • @Tinymoezzy
    @Tinymoezzy 3 роки тому +29

    Duvall was fantastic in pulling all her emotions to the surface.

  • @AmandaHugandKiss411
    @AmandaHugandKiss411 3 роки тому +143

    If you look closely at the picture it has many of the people in the pictured doubled and even tripled.
    I think this ties into your theories nicely.
    Having watched many different UA-camrs vids on the Shining, I haven't seen anyone mention that the scene where Jack is in the gold room and gets up from the bar just before bumping into the butler, a women in a gold dress passes in front of Jack with what looks like a bloody hand print on her buttocks.
    Also I noticed in this seen there is the row of people on the red couches we can see behind Jack as he is talking to the bartender but when he gets up to walk we can better see were the tables are which have white table clothes instead of red which would fit the decor better and that the dining table area is roped off by a red rope. I realize in real life these types are ropes are traditional red however I believe it is intentionally placed there. Besides, the bartender, the butler and the girl I mentioned in the gold gown, all of the people in there have minimal movement and they aren't making much noise, like they are suspended there or they are passively waiting for something .
    Its at this final picture scene that I really notice that the hotel is called the Overlook Hotel. I interpret this picture and writing on it differently each time watch the movie, does it we are supposed to over look the hotel an focus on other subplots, that the hotel itself overlooks over everything and everyone like how the role of the Caretaker would be or something else entirely.
    That's the beauty of Kubrick's films the layered meanings and the details he places into his work. It is said that nothing is there by accident but as Kubrick has said in interviews that the meaning is up to the interpretation of the viewer for all his films.
    Excellent video, thanks for posting it!

    • @andria8279
      @andria8279 3 роки тому

      Imagine the hotel never existed and it was just a dream 💀

    • @Lpool-mx6rl
      @Lpool-mx6rl 2 роки тому +7

      Many people double or tripled? I've just looked at it no body is doubled or tripled at all 😂

    • @Gunner192
      @Gunner192 2 роки тому +1

      @@Lpool-mx6rl I agree. They are all the same ethnicity, all dressed the same with the same hairstyles & many of the men have the same type of mustache. I can understand how it could be easy to get them confused, but see nothing to determine the same people are double or tripled.

    • @deusvult7211
      @deusvult7211 2 роки тому +5

      When I was watching the movie with my family, I was the only one to notice the lady with a bloody hand stain. I’m glad to know that I’m not crazy! 😂

    • @AmandaHugandKiss411
      @AmandaHugandKiss411 2 роки тому

      @@deusvult7211 😎

  • @oscarg8280
    @oscarg8280 5 років тому +179

    I believe jack is possessed by the original caretaker of the hotel and the cycle will continue on as long as the hotel stands

    • @ismu34
      @ismu34 5 років тому +14

      I think in the book instead of freezing to death, Jack gets killed when the boiler explodes and destroys the hotel

    • @jrcspiderman2003
      @jrcspiderman2003 4 роки тому +13

      @@ismu34 yep and also in the book Jack truly and deeply loves his wife and son unlike in the movie to the point where unlike in the movie he's able to resist the hotel till the very end even at one point fighting back against the hotel and telling Danny to run before he loses complete control again in one last attempt to save his son from the monster the hotel was turning him into

    • @naomigarciagomez7890
      @naomigarciagomez7890 4 роки тому +3

      That was also my initial theory. It's like a passed down thing. Grady's soul possessed him but Grady was controlling him and doing everything possible for Jack to agree to do it

    • @jadex9733
      @jadex9733 3 роки тому

      @@jrcspiderman2003 did danny die?

    • @carlostejada1479
      @carlostejada1479 3 роки тому

      when was the last time that something like that happened in the movie?? the year before??
      I saw it a while ago

  • @444real
    @444real 5 років тому +860

    *My Mom took us kids to see this we were 11 so it was fine she didn’t realize that there was a naked lady in the movie.....that was the real scary part* .:.

    • @harryfishback8173
      @harryfishback8173 5 років тому +34

      My brothers and I were between 8-12 we were staying at a hotel next to a Drive in and although we couldn't hear too well that scene scared the f outta me lol

    • @nonGigi
      @nonGigi 5 років тому +23

      My girlfriend cried when she saw her

    • @pauli.vanili
      @pauli.vanili 5 років тому +44

      There’s always a naked woman in a Stanley Kubrick movie.

    • @abeedhal6519
      @abeedhal6519 5 років тому +14

      you must be us american.

    • @emer157
      @emer157 5 років тому +20

      Wow, A naked lady, how scandalous!

  • @jcarlovitch
    @jcarlovitch 4 роки тому +78

    The overlook hotel in the movie version can only influence evil people. There is subtle clues throughout the movie that Jack is evil because he is sexually molesting his son. Just a few are, in the beginning while still in Denver Danny has an episode which requires a Psychiatrist to talk to him while his mother is present. It takes place in his bedroom and throughout the conversation Danny who is lying on his bed has both hands over his genitals which is a classic sign of molestation, secondly next to him is a blanket with a teddy bear on it and the image is the exact same as the hotels imagine of the bear costumed man giving another man oral sex shown latter in the movie. At the hotel while waiting for the manager Ullman to explain the duties to jack Jack is passing the time outside his office reading playgirl which is a magazine that has nude men. Danny was not attacked in room 237 by the old lady but in fact was attacked by Jack. Children that age will often tell a far different version of an attack altering the facts including who did it which Danny did to his mother. Another clue to this is the fact when she told Jack the tale of the lady in the hotel he said "are you out of your fucking mind." Any man that did not attack his boy or believe that his wife did would naturally believe that someone else must be in the hotel. Jack in fact did not check 237 and that whole scene was a dream Jack had by his subconscious expressing the horror he put his son thru. The scene when Danny goes to the room to get toys and his Father sitting on the edge of the bed calls him over to give him a hug Jack uses the exact same motions and gestures to call him over that the lady in room 237 used with Jack.

    • @njhovo_
      @njhovo_ 3 роки тому +11

      Nah

    • @OM-md6ki
      @OM-md6ki 3 роки тому +7

      You got this whole speil from a different video in youtube... Could have just posted a link instead of wasting ur time

    • @jadex9733
      @jadex9733 3 роки тому

      @@njhovo_ piss off

    • @janisjay
      @janisjay 3 роки тому +1

      um no

  • @linjicakonikon7666
    @linjicakonikon7666 2 роки тому +8

    The Overlook Hotel is part of a chain that includes the Hotel California. Their motto: "You can check in any time you like, but you can never leave." A list of the other hotel locations can be found in the Twilight Zone. (For more modest accomodations, see also the Bates Motel, showers included)

  • @RWSThe101
    @RWSThe101 6 років тому +341

    I’ve always interpreted that final shot as signifying Jack’s spirit becoming one with the Overlook, and fulfilling his destiny of being the permanent caretaker. In Kubrick’s version, I believe it was the director’s original intention to suggest Jack’s fate had been predestined, an assumption further verified by the scene in in the hospital that was later deleted in the final cut of the film. I suppose Kubrick choose the eerie, ominous slow-zoom at the film’s conclusion because this is a horror film, not a detective film. Leaving the ending open for interpretation makes the film that much more efficient at what it’s attempting to accomplish; that being to scare the hell out of people in a way they’ve never been scared before.

    • @randallbrooks5787
      @randallbrooks5787 6 років тому +5

      ^This right here^!

    • @jonartscc968
      @jonartscc968 6 років тому +2

      I do think it was Kubricks intention to leave it up for interpretation what it actually means and that there isn't one correct answer to this question

    • @jonartscc968
      @jonartscc968 6 років тому

      youtubesucks well and now I just realised we were talking about the final shot only and not the whole story haha sorry got carried away a bit

    • @birdsfan57
      @birdsfan57 6 років тому +2

      Always thought the final shot meant that he was reincarnated from the original caretaker..."you've ALWAYS been the caretaker...I know...because I've ALWAYS been here"...

    • @ralphdavidson9542
      @ralphdavidson9542 6 років тому +1

      birdsfan57 that's what I thought.

  • @UnpimpYourAuto
    @UnpimpYourAuto 6 років тому +639

    When he enters the bar to find it completely empty, he does say that he'd sell his soul for a drink. At that point, he sees Lloyd the bartender. And after that, talks about how Lloyd was always the best bartender. I think at the point he offered his soul, he became one with the evil of the hotel. The picture at the end suggests to me that once you've been taken, you belong to the hotel forever. There's no guarantee that the picture is static either. It could be that he was inserted into the picture after his demise, but that indeed everyone in that picture was a damned soul taken by the hotel.

    • @UltimateEnd0
      @UltimateEnd0 6 років тому +8

      Apparently photographs can capture souls or soul fragments or something.

    • @UnpimpYourAuto
      @UnpimpYourAuto 6 років тому +18

      There have been some that have thought so. Although I was thinking of the picture as essentially being a "trophy case" of sorts.

    • @UltimateEnd0
      @UltimateEnd0 6 років тому +4

      It could very well be. I have thought the same thing while watching this scene. Also, there are real life ghost stories of people warping through time in haunted buildings. Maybe there is some kind of vortal or time portal to the 1920's there.

    • @bobthebear1246
      @bobthebear1246 6 років тому +3

      UnpimpYourAuto Absolutely.

    • @faithismine128
      @faithismine128 6 років тому +59

      When the bartender refuses money for payment and the drink is consumed the transaction is complete.

  • @janpowell1549
    @janpowell1549 2 роки тому +28

    Also, Jack had a bit of the shining as well, so therefore the Overlook could've worked on him through that, his ability is nowhere near close to Danny's or Halloran's. But Jack already has his demons and a dark side, Danny and Halloran shine bright and with positive power.❤

  • @MetalizedButt
    @MetalizedButt 4 роки тому +22

    Do all the events have anything to do with the hotel being built on an Indian burial ground?

  • @willg4802
    @willg4802 6 років тому +352

    The hotel catches men when they feel like they are failures, turns that frustration into anger and hatred, makes them kill their loved ones or kill themselves trying to kill their loved one, then has their soul forever. When it claims someone, it puts them in a picture.

    • @JaffytaffyBTC
      @JaffytaffyBTC 6 років тому +3

      Will G I like this theory of urs

    • @Pakeevid
      @Pakeevid 5 років тому +5

      The number of year 1921 is not the year.
      It's a number of how many souls were there.

    • @apartofshiningthomas7121
      @apartofshiningthomas7121 5 років тому

      Good idea

  • @hillbillydiva1309
    @hillbillydiva1309 6 років тому +903

    I think the director was diabolical as hell. He layered his films with so many contradicts that they will be debated forever cementing his fame.

    • @scaparapadoobedoooo3170
      @scaparapadoobedoooo3170 6 років тому +6

      No replies. I wonder why?

    • @jweezyyy
      @jweezyyy 6 років тому +4

      It’s smart

    • @Rachel-96
      @Rachel-96 6 років тому +49

      Stanley Kubrick is a genius...

    • @jb888888888
      @jb888888888 6 років тому +13

      Stanley Kubrick was the Tommy Weisau of the previous generation then?

    • @williamlavagna1096
      @williamlavagna1096 6 років тому +12

      David Lynch is infamous for doing that.
      Many directors do it. Scorsese did it with Shutter Island as well.

  • @shadesofgray5476
    @shadesofgray5476 4 роки тому +17

    Since Jack is wearing a tuxedo in the picture, I think it shows him as an important hotel guest and not a worker. Or he was the manager of the hotel, not just a caretaker. So, either he becomes a guest by going back in time or he is a reincarnated guest drawn back to the place.

  • @joelewing4498
    @joelewing4498 4 роки тому +12

    I'm 65 and doing the "Covid-Shuffle" at home here. I mention my age, b/c as a kid in the 1960's, my family would drive from Az. back to our native Nebraska and always make a stop there at Estes Park, Colo and go into the Stanley Hotel for a little stretch-break. The "Stanley" that built the hotel was also the "Stanley" from the "Stanley Steamer" steam automobiles wayyy back when.

    • @lohst1672
      @lohst1672 4 роки тому

      I’ll be 65 in 40 years.

  • @bartolomeestebanmurillo4459
    @bartolomeestebanmurillo4459 5 років тому +180

    Jack is now part of the hotel, it's a repository of souls. The novel implies the ghosts were not nice people in life and only stay in the hotel because they know something far worse waits for them in the afterlife. Fun fact that is a real 1920s photo with Jack edited into it.

    • @AmandaHugandKiss411
      @AmandaHugandKiss411 3 роки тому +4

      Not so sure, if it was it was highly modified for the movie. A number of the people are doubled or even tripled intentionally it seems.

    • @atomato5989
      @atomato5989 3 роки тому +2

      @@AmandaHugandKiss411 No, it’s real. I don’t remember where I saw it, but his head was edited in and I’ve seen the original.

    • @carlostejada1479
      @carlostejada1479 3 роки тому +2

      the photo is supposley from 1921.
      not 1920.
      is the original from 1920??

    • @carlostejada1479
      @carlostejada1479 2 роки тому

      @name
      3:43 look at the picture (pause)
      it says july (or something) 1921

  • @djhvallejo
    @djhvallejo 6 років тому +85

    I feel for Shelly Duval, they say that this movie is the start of her mental downward spiral. I hope she gets the help she needs.

  • @user-si7qm6jv9r
    @user-si7qm6jv9r 4 роки тому +12

    The photo at the end of the shining was the first ever cursed image

  • @baldboyfriend8589
    @baldboyfriend8589 4 роки тому +11

    The concept of the hotel being alive I think is quite true in this theory. Maybe the hotel stored Jack's soul, like it did with all the other people, and the twins, who were obviously the children that were murdered by the previous dude who murdered his family. Like the twins, Jack will forever be a part of the hotel, and the next people to come will probably see Jack, like how Danny saw the twins, and how all three members of the family saw people there that obviously weren't physically there. So yeah, quite literally, the Hotel is the monster.

  • @jwolveee
    @jwolveee 6 років тому +133

    Jack Torrance offered his soul for a drink. He recognized Lloyd, as he had been there before. He's always been there. Shining is the ability to see residual energy of that which has taken place in the past. We inherit our traits from our parents. Danny's Mother, when in shock and fear, is finally able to see (Shine) many of the damnable events which have transpired over the years at the Overlook hotel. When Jack Torrance finally dies, he once again takes his rightful place (as seen in the picture) among the others... in hell.

  • @russ8001
    @russ8001 6 років тому +352

    When Jack screws up and gets locked in the room by his wife, he makes a deal with a ghost that lets him out. That deal was that he would kill his family like Grady had done. I think that this is the moment when Jack seals the link to the 1920's. The ballroom becoming crowded doesn't surprise Jack because he was transported back there to consult the ghosts. The photo is confirmation that he had been transported back there and I think it is only that he frequented the ballroom to consult with the ghosts and get a drink. I do not think he was part of the hotel or that he was reincarnated. Jack's timeline starts in the modern era and merely visits the past a few times and that photo was taken during one of those times. That's my reading of it anyway...as for why Jack appears as sort of the star in the photo, well that might be because he became very popular with the bartender, and Grady who felt less guilt for having gone on to murder his daughters and wife and himself.

    • @whiterabbit8067
      @whiterabbit8067 5 років тому +18

      Yassss... I thought this was obvious. I didn't know people were questioning it. The photo confirmed that he actually seen the ghosts and visited the past, it wasn't all in his head.

    • @ktrevellion1995
      @ktrevellion1995 5 років тому +7

      Jack sold his soul to the devil 'I'd give anything for just one godamned drink' suddenly Lloyd the bartender appears is he the devil?

    • @kathyloveless6525
      @kathyloveless6525 5 років тому +6

      @@ktrevellion1995 Yes i believe he is. The red jacket soon gives it away.

    • @johngrady769
      @johngrady769 5 років тому +1

      Grady. So Mr Grady. Grady Grady Grady.... I love it, as my last name is Grady. I also share Steven King's birthday. Hell yeah!!!

    • @deebonash1495
      @deebonash1495 4 роки тому

      Yes the devil made a deal with him. Seems

  • @johnnymills4022
    @johnnymills4022 4 роки тому +10

    The Shining is my all-time favorite movie as well. You know, the thing that drives me totally crazy every time I watch the ending is, what is written in the tiny note Jack holds in his right hand under his thumb. I know that it is a common method for passing someone important and private information during a handshake, but it has driven me totally crazy wondering what that tiny slip of paper says!!!!

  • @andrewbrendan1579
    @andrewbrendan1579 3 роки тому +2

    At :07 where it's mentioned that "...the cinematography is outstanding..." we see two evergreen trees standing next to one another in the background and with the sky behind them. Maybe a reference to the Grady twins or some other aspect of duality in the film?

  • @cleonRIP
    @cleonRIP 5 років тому +47

    My friend described it so perfectly back in 2008. Everyone joins the party eventually

  • @stacyjennings1527
    @stacyjennings1527 5 років тому +37

    I think the ending photo is really spooky... if I may be so bold sir.

  • @Ilivfrhorrr
    @Ilivfrhorrr 4 роки тому +11

    I believe that Jack is the reincarnation of an evil entity that collects certain souls to satisfy the hotel's hunger.

  • @ericlofstrand
    @ericlofstrand 4 роки тому +18

    His line with Wendy about how "she's DISTRACTING HIM" is one of the best acting displays I've ever seen of a man trying to do what he needs to do to provide for his family and not wanting to yell but furious inside so it comes out in comical ways

    • @mikrokozm9
      @mikrokozm9 2 роки тому

      INDEED...Wendy not attending to her job as mother & keeping Doc away from Jack & his work is what caused Jack to yank him up & hurt his arm. Then the naive way she carries herself by walking in on Jack while he was typing. I think the viewer is as annoyed by her as they fear for her & Doc. It's less about how nuts Jack is, and more about WHY. It's obvious why Jack can't stand her, so it makes it comical to hear his contemptuous sarcasm directed at her. Few don't enjoy this movie because of that. I doubt people that are exactly like Wendy would appreciate it. Perhaps stranded in a remote hotel in the winter with an alcoholic suffering from writer's block is not Wendy's first & only mistake. But what BETTER way to set the stage for a horror masterpiece?

  • @Foldy435
    @Foldy435 5 років тому +55

    "I would sell my soul for a drink."

    • @celtictillidie67
      @celtictillidie67 5 років тому +1

      Name it av got it lol ....

    • @davidtimmel4027
      @davidtimmel4027 4 роки тому +1

      That's not what he said. He said "I'd sell my soul for just a glass of beer"

    • @-MrRichBiker1967
      @-MrRichBiker1967 3 роки тому +4

      lloyd, the bartender was a ghost, who bought jacks soul..." your money is no good her, Mr Torrance...not now, anyway"

    • @-MrRichBiker1967
      @-MrRichBiker1967 3 роки тому +1

      "Maurie's wigs, dont come off"......jumps into a swimming pool...lol

    • @Foldy435
      @Foldy435 3 роки тому

      @@-MrRichBiker1967 Just off with Jimmy to have a talk about my share and buy Belle some danish.

  • @tleeg74
    @tleeg74 6 років тому +50

    This movie still freaks me out to this day. It's a masterpiece.

    • @helenmorcom7530
      @helenmorcom7530 6 років тому

      it freaks my daughter out......still....shes 45 years old....go figure

    • @rosa273
      @rosa273 5 років тому

      +helen morcom u old old

    • @altitudeiseverything3163
      @altitudeiseverything3163 4 роки тому

      rosie rosa - And you’re rude, rude.

  • @ramseywrinkles2485
    @ramseywrinkles2485 3 роки тому +8

    My theory is that jacks soul is trapped within the hotel, remember when he said “I want to stay her forever and ever”

  • @IWearShades
    @IWearShades Рік тому +4

    The ending in a nutshell is that jack is alive in his current time and not a reincarnation. He has a family but has a damaged past the hotel feeds off this and drives him mad to consume him and collect him along with the other people it has captured over the years. The photo at the end is the collection of people that the hotel has taken thus Jack being the newest addition.

  • @whitehawk3776
    @whitehawk3776 6 років тому +126

    I took it to mean the hotel draws people to it and then drives them insane to both kill and die at the hotel. The picture symbolizes the hotel now owning his soul forever, along with the others in the photo.

    • @Rose-pr1wl
      @Rose-pr1wl 6 років тому +1

      Makes sense 2 me. He was vulnerable too bcuz he was an alcoholic with inner demons. Entities prey on the weak.

  • @boradis
    @boradis 6 років тому +218

    I interpreted the photo to mean Jack's spirit had been absorbed by the hotel, like a fly trapped in amber.

    • @afterburner2869
      @afterburner2869 6 років тому +1

      boradis Curse you underdog.

    • @dididylan-pena6597
      @dididylan-pena6597 6 років тому +1

      Why would he pose in such manner? The arms looks similar to a mason pose or a Luciferian arm pose. Do you think Kubrick did that on purpose?

    • @jonathandiosa5739
      @jonathandiosa5739 6 років тому +4

      You got me at amber

    • @xXNoSeQuePonerXx
      @xXNoSeQuePonerXx 6 років тому +1

      Didí Dylan - Peña I read somewhere that the picture was an actual photograph from the 1920's and they just added Jack's face to another man's body, so the pose was already there

    • @dididylan-pena6597
      @dididylan-pena6597 6 років тому

      Natalia oh Ok!! Thanks for the info. But somebody in the 20's liked to pose as baphometh, then🤤.

  • @jakekaufman8302
    @jakekaufman8302 2 роки тому +1

    I figured it out from the start that the pictures were from everyone who died there and now haunts the hotel.

  • @Belushi87
    @Belushi87 3 роки тому +1

    i always thought that the people in the picture were people that died at the hotel some point and are stuck there forever. Jack being the last person to die, he’s the most recent spirit hence why he’s front and centre.

  • @greasyhair5754
    @greasyhair5754 5 років тому +55

    This movie is a brilliant acid trip of a movie! Sometimes you just need to go with the flow and accept its madness!

    • @bigtodd6609
      @bigtodd6609 5 років тому +3

      I watched it on acid and had a bad trip

    • @jawsports4679
      @jawsports4679 2 роки тому +1

      @@bigtodd6609 well I’d assume u would’ve lmao u couldn’t pay me to watch this on acid

    • @garyisok1
      @garyisok1 2 роки тому +1

      hey, maybe stick to 2001 on acid!

    • @bigtodd6609
      @bigtodd6609 2 роки тому

      @@jawsports4679 I passed out from fear, haha

  • @MrChezlor
    @MrChezlor 5 років тому +31

    To me personally I think of it as being more of a message of the story than actually a massive part of the film. I think of it as like purgatory. In that once you are stuck somewhere time then becomes irrelevant. But it’s one of them init it’ll mean a million different things to a million people.

  • @alannataylor818
    @alannataylor818 4 роки тому +8

    I think it’s like in Haunting of Hill House , your soul was always there and always will be here . Like Nelly and the bentneck lady

    • @jrcspiderman2003
      @jrcspiderman2003 4 роки тому +1

      That moment when it was revealed that the bent-neck lady was actually Nelly herself was like the only part of the series that actually gave me the chills

  • @SpotlessLeopard
    @SpotlessLeopard 4 роки тому +7

    The picture says 1921, and the bloke who introduces the hotel to Jack near the beginning of the film is called Stuart Ullman.
    S is letter 19 of the alphabet, and U is letter 21.
    19 and 21.
    1921.
    So potentially, Kubrick was telling us that Ullman was also part of the hotel and didn't really exist as a person, and the whole film is in fact a physical characterisation of the process of the hotel reliving it's past in the form of a modern murder.

  • @MT-tu8dt
    @MT-tu8dt 5 років тому +13

    To me that photo is the hotel's victims. More like the hotel's trophies on display for guests to look at and the guests not coming to the realization that they could be the ones next to join them in the photo. As for Jack being in the front the photo, it's the hotel's way of saying he was our recent target and we want you to see it front and center until we find another caretaker to take Jack's place in the photo.

  • @max-greg
    @max-greg 6 років тому +36

    1:18 "honey, give me a towel please"

  • @mysterymanphoto
    @mysterymanphoto 3 роки тому +1

    Happy official 100 years since that photo was taken

  • @contemporarymale
    @contemporarymale 2 роки тому +3

    Read the book. “All times are one in the overlook” jack and all the dead become absorbed by the overlook and the overlook wanted danny not jack. In fact in one scene when jack is locked in the pantry Grady says that the manager “overlook” should have tried to take Wendy instead since she had gotten the best of jack. The hotel wants to absorb danny because of his powers which the hotel can then use to its own benefit.

  • @DementedCaver
    @DementedCaver 6 років тому +36

    I always just assumed that Kubrick enjoyed f***ing with his audiences minds, does there really need to be a deeper meaning than that.

  • @josephdavis8555
    @josephdavis8555 4 роки тому +101

    He was possessed by the spirits that already existed. More importantly, this was a creation of Kubrick. It was not Steven King's idea of how this movie was to be done. Great as it is and I still love it, it is not the Shining from the book. Read it and see. Also read Dr. Sleep.

  • @rayva1
    @rayva1 4 роки тому +9

    The novel had a very different ending.

  • @cccknox
    @cccknox 4 роки тому +2

    Makes the line: "Orders from the House" truly make since. I support your theory.

  • @DursunX
    @DursunX 5 років тому +47

    the hotel claimed him and made him part of its macabre history. forever in the past and never the present.
    loop closed.

  • @eyetunes7754
    @eyetunes7754 5 років тому +4

    The way Jack is standing in the picture is the, "As above so below" pose. This movie is full of esoteric reference.

  • @watermelonlalala
    @watermelonlalala 4 роки тому +5

    This ending always reminded me of The Haunting, where a woman with a screw loose is wanted by an evil haunted house, at the end she tries to leave but the house makes her crash her car into a tree and be killed. Another character comments that she got what she wanted, really, to stay with the house. The house is evil, the woman is nutty before she gets there, the house wants her to stay forever, she didn't plan to die but the evil force takes her. I see The Shining exactly the same, a male version. The bar scene with Lloyd appears to be a sell your soul to the devil moment. Lloyd, the devil. The two Gradys, I have no idea.

  • @Do_i_amuse_you
    @Do_i_amuse_you Рік тому +1

    I always felt like Jack's spirit became part of the hotel and was added in the picture after he died.

  • @sammarchetti2484
    @sammarchetti2484 6 років тому +261

    Has anyone noticed that in that picture he is holding his arms in the baphomet pose?

    • @mdhcccc
      @mdhcccc 5 років тому +19

      Sam Marchetti oh shit

    • @something6510
      @something6510 5 років тому +13

      Oh. You're right.

    • @Cairwenful
      @Cairwenful 5 років тому +7

      Sweet mama Jesus he sure is!

    • @Capt_Killingfield
      @Capt_Killingfield 5 років тому +15

      Sam Marchetti Dang that makes it hella more creepy and leads to more questions

    • @sammarchetti2484
      @sammarchetti2484 5 років тому +5

      @@Capt_Killingfield I you pay attention, you will see that pose everywhere

  • @miguelBT2809
    @miguelBT2809 6 років тому +44

    The hotel was built on an Indian burial grounds by “Jack” back in the 1910’s.
    Jack was cursed for his greed & nonchalance of desecrating sacred grounds. Reincarnated every twenty years until his hotel is demolished & remains moved from the grounds.
    Grady is an evil spirit that inhabits a guest, possessed, who always nudges Jack to “correct” his family.
    The bartender, Lloyd, too had the “Shine” & helped Wendy find Jack in hopes that she would catch him as his mental soundness collapses. The Lloyd, too, fell victim of Jack as Dick Halloran did.

    • @e11esounds
      @e11esounds 5 років тому

      this!

    • @mikelitoris7001
      @mikelitoris7001 4 роки тому

      Wow really interesting , never saw it that way and makes absolutely.sense

  • @fzcbh4698
    @fzcbh4698 2 роки тому +3

    When I was young I thought the ending meant that they exposed to us that Jack is originally a serial killer before and he used to work with rich people until one day they made a celebration inside the hotel and at that night Jack killed everyone in the hotel and escaped.
    Years after years Jack got cured from being psychopathic and forget his past so he married and after years he accidentally back to the same hotel so his psychopath memories start back again by walking inside every room and saw some ghosts of people that he killed them who they try to make him psycho again to kill his family cause they want to get their revenge on Jack and made him lose something close to him.

  • @johnnyc4738
    @johnnyc4738 4 роки тому +6

    "There are other worlds...." - Jake Chambers

  • @AZZA5102
    @AZZA5102 4 роки тому +28

    To create true suspense you need to let the audience decide. The ending is what you make it, the decision is yours.

  • @ANIMALFLYER456
    @ANIMALFLYER456 6 років тому +73

    I always saw it as the house absorbing him into the photo, and he'll become another ghost to taunt the next caretaker. And the photo will become more crowed as the Years go by

  • @Chris-tq1jy
    @Chris-tq1jy Рік тому +11

    The guy in the pig outfit blowing the guy in the bed was definitely the climax of the movie..

  • @VeracityLH
    @VeracityLH 4 роки тому +2

    I figured the moment the hotel took him, he appeared in the photograph, a permanent part of the hotel.

  • @levid5102
    @levid5102 6 років тому +687

    H E R E ' S
    J O H N N Y !

    • @Matter2120
      @Matter2120 6 років тому +3

      H E R E S
      JOHNNY GARGANO

    • @ChubbyChecker182
      @ChubbyChecker182 6 років тому +10

      Oh Hi Johnny

    • @007Rui1
      @007Rui1 6 років тому +1

      It bothers me. The "Here`s Johnny" moment. It has 0 relation to the rest of the movie and it doesnt even appear in the book. Why?

    • @ExMachina70
      @ExMachina70 6 років тому +1

      Give me the bat!

    • @ChubbyChecker182
      @ChubbyChecker182 6 років тому +4

      Nowadays it would be "Here's Joanne"

  • @GrimmShadowsII
    @GrimmShadowsII 6 років тому +56

    I think basicly once the hotel claims you you exist at all moments it exists going back to the big event in1921 so every soul it captures appears in that picture.

  • @Delisle4
    @Delisle4 4 роки тому +2

    This is a great video and you bring up some very good points. For my money I would propose the following: 1) The hotel is a living entity powered by all the souls that are trapped as residual energy. 2) The hotel psychically drew Jack and his family to this place. 3) Jack is a real live person who is empathic (a gift he passed on to his son) and able to connect to the spirits in the hotel. 4) Jack is manipulated by the hotel to kill his family. 5) When Jack dies in the maze, his soul is sucked in and trapped inside the time warp that exists on another plane inside the hotel......another one bites the dust.

  • @jaymoose9313
    @jaymoose9313 4 роки тому +4

    His smile and pose makes it look like he’s actually there . This movie is so fucking creepy I love it. Like it isn’t quite all evil but definitely not all good either. It’s cursed like the hotel.

  • @patricksnavely7506
    @patricksnavely7506 6 років тому +18

    Grady told him that Jack's always had been the caretaker...

  • @jbainbridge22
    @jbainbridge22 6 років тому +9

    I like the idea of him being consumed by the picture upon dying and merging his spirit with the hotel personally.

  • @cleenegame
    @cleenegame Рік тому +1

    My theory is that Jack was the only one who was able to escape the hotel, that's why it called him back and revived his memory by making him kill his family. It's Kubrick saying that you can't escape your real nature no matter how you try. 💐

  • @bear6979
    @bear6979 4 роки тому +3

    I think the hotel picture is just everyone who had died. And maybe the picture shows people in the future who will die.

  • @Ginx-pe4si
    @Ginx-pe4si 6 років тому +257

    Anyone else like the ballroom music?