The Great Captains in American History - Grant
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
- Jean Edward Smith
Institute for the Study of Diplomacy at Georgetown ·
Building on our successful history weekend in 2012 on "Great Battles in American History," this program will cover those American military leaders who made great marks on U.S. history through their generalship. The distinguished scholars David Eisenhower, Jim Lacey, Edward G. Lengel, Peter Mansoor, Jean Edward Smith, Lewis Sorley, and Samuel Watson will cover great military leaders from General George Washington to General David Petraeus. This program is sponsored by the Foreign Policy Research Institute's Madeleine and W. W. Keen Butcher History Institute in cooperation with the First Division Museum at Cantigny, a division of the Robert R. McCormick Foundation. This is the eighth in a series of weekends devoted to Teaching Military History.
Jean Edward Smith on General Ulysses S. Grant
I have seen more than one lecturer get rather emotional when talking about Grant. Could it be that the more we know of him we see ourselves in Grant, the Everyman, thrust into an incredible and difficult situation and rising to the occasion at great personal cost?
or would like to be
Ferdinand Ward thought so. Ponzi. Greed $$$$😮
Finally someone giving Grant his due and no sugar coating civil war history with lost cause BS and calling it the treason it was.
Tell me about it! I never got into the civil war and was more into the revolutionary war era. When Chernow’s book on Grant came out I got it and was shocked at how under appreciated and rumor ruined his historical reputation.
I just actually watched the Gore Vidal’s Lincoln miniseries from the 80s and couldn’t believe how bad it was. Lincoln visits Grant at Petersburg and he’s in his tent and he’s sitting there with an old fashion glass with whiskey on the rocks. 🙄👌 like the way portrayed him was a “drunk butcher “ never thinking how yes he drank but the officer corps was like junior high and 95% was rumor but certainly never in battle. Then he’s portrayed as not caring about any of his men just a means to an end. I actually read an article that Grant had among the lowest casualty rate during the war vs Lee who was the highest but Lee is a godly aristocrat and Grant was a nobody. Lost causers say he only won because of “manpower and supplies “ then how did the previous generals lose with the same resources ? Or were they so bad Lee was no genius at all? They can’t seem to pick.
@@marquisdelafayette1929 I am reading it now. Grant was so under appreciated .
Well said!
I am just finishing the Chernow biography of Grant. I highly recommend it. The picture at the beginning is on the dust jacket of Chernow’s book.
His tears were impressive. Remembering his great-grandfather who died at Shiloh. Remembering his father’s words. Wow.
17:56 this is one of my favorite Grant stories. It’s a lesson for anyone in command.
If you want to win a battle pick Lee. If you want to win a war pick Grant.
You mean Lincoln.
I keep getting robbed of your book Mr Smith. It's an odd phenomenon but I will persist. U. S. Grant is my favorite American. I really love the story of his friendship with Longstreet who lived twenty years longer than General Grant until 1904. He just brings tears to my eyes. Reconstruction fails for many reasons Grant couldn't make the rest of the country willing to continue I guess but General Sheridan writes in 1867 we had a little hubbub but now white and black ride the trams side by side happily New Orleans is Desegregated! Confederates put up statutes at end of Grant's Presidency which signals Jim crow black laws preventing the exercise of their 1866 right to vote 1875.And amnesia sets in collectively. No more.
Hi Teresa! Do you really think that it ever ended? This time, the Jacobins (the Democrats) who started the first civil war, are trying again. It's now just how many Americans know the truth! Maybe a man or two could fight back/
Grant is my favorite American as well Teresa. A true hero who saved the Union and moved our civilization forward by a lot. Unfortunately have we forgotten the truth about what he did.
@@alec2726 stop watching Fox News.
Grant was a great man, and the greatest commander in US history...but... should have hanged Lee, Davis, Longstreet, Early and all the others from trees in plantations.
GE That would have been, at a minimum, insubordination, and perhaps mutiny and war crime, given Lincoln’s policies, which are clear in his second inaugural address. In the military at war, one does as he is ordered, or pays a very high price. Emotion has no place in a military officer at war. Presumably, you have no military training. If you do, you did not learn the basics.
@Andy G Traitors and mass murderers should have been hanged. Still paying for the mistake of letting them live.
Lincoln wouldn't have wanted that. He wanted a reconciliation of the country, and that would have deepened the divide.
Professor Jean Edward Smith Grant biography
8:29 a defining moment for Smith and a powerful truth for us all.
I really wasn't expecting this video to make me cry, but here we are
My God. Less than four hundred views. Why is a riveting documentary, necessarily confined in point of view and limited in addressing facts, required in order to get an audience? Or better yet, a great movie oblivious to the facts? Little wonder this nation is so disturbingly historically illiterate.
Agree! I am rereading the Lloyd Lewis/Bruce Catton biography. Will work my way thru succeeding bios.
And this shit is available to us for free lol..its sad but at least some of us are smart enough to view them
Excellent!
I am curious from someone who studied Grant, in his opinion, what does he think, if Lee would have written a memoir, how Lee would have written it, especially on his opinion in Grant as a military leader and his opinion on Grant as a person…
Visit the new ten million dollar Grant Presidential at Mississippi State University. Yes, you read that right. Btw, to the comment below. Grant did not own slaves. His wife's family did, but they Grant and his wife did not. He was an ardent abolitionist
grant did own a slave, given to him by his father in law. his manumission of him is on record. his wife kept her slaves during the early part of their marriage.
Thanks
Dude the audience seem to be attacking the speaker for some weird reason. Everybody’s an expert. 😂
Read the comments and you’d think Lee had won. The war’s over man. Lol
8:00 wow
Love the talk but these are the oldest high school kids I have ever seen (except me)?
Young Frank Robinson Elizabeth Young Sandra
❤️❤️❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
31:22: Grant did not die in '65.
Where are the US Grants of the current Republican Party?
Is this guy a total state lover. War is "bad" but a man's gotta do . . .union forever.
Sorry to say text books are crap..
The guy trying to justify US war atrocities abroad should be ashamed of his disregard for non-American lives.
Yeah what are you talking about?
Grant was good but Lee was better. If Lee had the numbers and Equipment Grant had and Grant had Lees numbers do any of you Grant lovers think Grant would have won. And just to make it clear I admire the resistance the Confederate army put up for 4 years but I realise it was a good thing the Union won.
Lee was good but not better than Grant. An invading army is always at a disadvantage fighting on the enemy's turf. Basic military axiom. Lee's soldiers and might have been better than Grant's but many Union soldiers were fresh off the boat from Europe and had practically never held a gun before their first battle. Despite that, Grant lost fewer soldiers than conventional wisdom dictated. If their roles were reversed, Grant would probably still have won because the Union would have sued for peace at any price without Grant and his key victories despite the Union advantages in numbers and equipment. Just saying.
You’re mistaken.
Lee was good at winning battles but he never understood the overall strategy of the Confederacy.
They where fighting for independence and time was on their side as it would’ve put political pressure in the divided Union.
Therefor they could’ve just chosen a defensive strategy with the benefits of better positioning which would’ve given them a 3 -1 favorable casualty rate.
Lee only knew to attack though, which he did well, but that cost him way to many casualties which he couldn’t make up for.
@@brittbooth7616 💯
Lee had advantage of not actually having to win the war, was fighting a defensive war to get Europe nations to recognize the confederacy. Lee went on the offensive one time and got crushed at Gettysburg
*Lee freed his slaves. Grant did not. This guy is extremely one-sided.*
Grant had a total of 1 slave, given to him by his father in law. He freed him even though he could have sold him for $1000 (over $10000 today) and even though he was totally broke and had a family. Lee “freed” his many slaves when they were confiscated by the government when he became a traitor. Learn your history.
Robert E. Lee and Slavery
Contributed by Allen C. Guelzo
Robert E. Lee was the most successful Confederate military leader during the American Civil War (1861-1865). This also made him, by virtue of the Confederacy's defense of chattel slavery, the most successful defender of the enslavement of African Americans. Yet his own personal record on both slavery and race is mottled with contradictions and ambivalence, all which were in plain view during his long career. Born into two of Virginia's most prominent families, Lee spent his early years surrounded by enslaved African Americans, although that changed once he joined the Army. His wife, Mary Randolph Custis Lee, freed her own personal slaves, but her father, George Washington Parke Custis, still owned many people, and when he died, Robert E. Lee, as executor of his estate, was responsible for manumitting them within five years. He was widely criticized for taking the full five years. Lee and his wife supported the American Colonization Society before the war but resisted the abolitionist movement. Lee later insisted that his decision to support the Confederacy was not founded on a defense of slavery. During both the Maryland (1862) and Gettysburg (1863) campaigns, Lee's officers kidnapped free blacks and sold them into slavery. By 1865, Lee supported the enlistment of African Americans into the Confederate army, but he surrendered before a plan could be implemented. After the war, he generally opposed racial and political equality for African Americans. MORE...
Read more.
Interesting that Grant agreed with Lincoln's view of the Mexican war. Unjust.
Lots of good first hand info. Looks like dude served with Grant
Great lecture, thank you very much.
the funny thing is that none of you even know who i am no matter how much youve seen you cat even touch me. you are so limited it would take you a thousand years just to catch up with what ive already shown you.
A very informative lecture, but damn, for a public speaker this guy certainly stutters a lot! A bit annoying in the Q&A.
@Tom Douglas Sicks Silly me, I forgot. No one is ever allowed to make comments on anything they're not doing themselves.
Tool.
@@pcbacklash_3261 your reply was in bad taste and moreover indicated lack of understanding of the topic at hand...
@@billhammett174 I can accept that it may have been in bad taste, but how in the world does it indicate a "lack of understanding of the topic at hand?" I merely commented that it was very informative.
Ulysses!!!!
I keep double-taking every time this guy misspeaks, which is about every other sentence.
Even Lincoln said the war wasn't over slavery. It was his war, wouldn't he know what it was about?
Consumer Strike! Lincoln never said that. In fact he said the opposite. Stop with your lies
@@christiansoldier77 He certainly did, you would have to know some history to know. Slavery was legal in the south, the federal government had no jurisdiction over slavery were it existed. It would have been an illegal war of Lincoln made it about slavery.
@@fraudsarentfriends4717 I forgot more about history than you will ever know. The war was always about slavery only a fool doesn't understand this. The Confederates seceded because the Republicans were threatening to end slavery. This is just historical fact whether you are too ignorant to understand this or not
41 out of 56 of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were slave owners. They were not all from the South.
what a warrior raping women, murdering and kidnapping in the 'total war ' policy against civilians.
No more like destroying the rebels ability to make war by taking food and farm equipment such as horses and slaves.
For that matter how about US policy of fire bombing entire German and Japan cities.
Ryan Otteros War is hell. Countries that start wars, with the support of their citizens have no rights to cry about atrocities.