What would the Premier League & EFL look like if all 92 Clubs used their original names?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 78

  • @aus3492
    @aus3492 11 днів тому +7

    Liverpool originally applied to be called Everton they were never granted permission to play as Everton because there was already Everton... no matter how well they do it's always worth reminding them that Liverpool was their 2nd choice name.

  • @steveallen3434
    @steveallen3434 23 дні тому +5

    way cooler club badges back in the day

  • @russybcool
    @russybcool 18 днів тому +4

    As an MK Dons customer I came here for the comments and was not disappointed.

  • @AndrewHogarth-o8b
    @AndrewHogarth-o8b 4 дні тому

    Great stuff well researched . My favourite has to be Walsall Town Swifts . I
    I
    I😅

  • @Footy13s
    @Footy13s 25 днів тому +1

    Good vid, thanks!

  • @Ramtamtama
    @Ramtamtama 27 днів тому +3

    AFC Bournemouth were originally called Boscombe FC, not taking the name Bournemouth & Boscombe Athletic until after WWI.
    MK Dons are *officially* a new club founded in 2004. If, however, you want to trace them back through Wimbledon then they'd be Wimbledon Old Central.

  • @Ulkomaalainen
    @Ulkomaalainen 11 днів тому +1

    Now somebody needs to make a Football Manager save with these names and coats and publish it. Bonus points if for all the other major leagues as well (Stade St Germain, Football Sky Madrid, Milan Cricket and Football, Wilhelmina Rotterdam. Today's major German clubs are lacking, being founded under their name, but Falke Eppendorf for Hamburg would be an example).

  • @TomClarkSouthLondon
    @TomClarkSouthLondon 26 днів тому +3

    *the CRYSTAL PALACE FOOTBALL CLUB! . . . . . .since 1861!* ❤️👍

    • @Footy13s
      @Footy13s 25 днів тому

      I am so confused, why did your badge change dates on in a few years ago?

  • @typhoon2827
    @typhoon2827 19 днів тому +1

    Middlesbrough was called Ironopolis before it was Middlesbrough. They played at Paradise Fields, the corner or which became Ayresome Park. There's still a bit of wall there from Ayresome Park, the rest just houses.

    • @Retro-Football-Club
      @Retro-Football-Club  19 днів тому +2

      Great comment, Yeah we looked into this one before hand it was called Middlesbrough FC first, then several members left to form Middlesbrough Ironopolis after a dispute, technically they are listed as a separate club. Both teams debuted professionally in 1899, then they ended up merging. Hence why we used Middlesbrough FC in the video

  • @glen1555
    @glen1555 19 днів тому

    Sheffield United's full title was Sheffield United cricket and football club, then in 1974 the South Stand was built over the cricket square, the cricket club relocated and the Pavillion demolished. Pleased you got Bradford City in as Manningham.

  • @sentinel8617
    @sentinel8617 28 днів тому +17

    Black Arabs 👀 definitely would have been going the way of the Washington Redskins if it was still around today

    • @DerInselaffe
      @DerInselaffe 28 днів тому +4

      Definitely. Great name for its time and was probably considered quite cool but it's probably for the best that they became Rovers. The kit was awesome too: all black with a yellow sash on the shirt. It's why the pirate on the current club badge is blacked out with a yellow sash. Common second strip colours too.

    • @liamphillips9742
      @liamphillips9742 27 днів тому +1

      We are not American. We don't give a fuck

    • @sentinel8617
      @sentinel8617 27 днів тому +2

      @@liamphillips9742ever heard of the Exeter Chiefs ? 👀

    • @johnthompson457
      @johnthompson457 25 днів тому

      Easily the best team name. If they were still called that I just might have to start following them.

    • @apb3440
      @apb3440 22 дні тому +1

      You mean the team that was forced to change their name because some morons got offended on behalf of people who weren’t offended and have tried ever since to have the Redskins name reintroduced ?

  • @peterwilson9282
    @peterwilson9282 24 дні тому +1

    Plymouth Argyle Where called Argyle Athletic FC - which encompassed Association Football, Athletics and Rugby!

  • @stbu9709
    @stbu9709 20 днів тому

    Grimsby Pelham FC love it and the 3 wild boar on the original badge! 🏴🏳️🏴

  • @andrewpeake1712
    @andrewpeake1712 11 годин тому

    Oh wow. Some improvements but for the most part the current badges are terrible. As a Stoke Sufferer ... the old badge is awesome.

  • @rickygrimshaw1255
    @rickygrimshaw1255 25 днів тому +2

    Boscombe back of the net!!!! 🍒

  • @coyh1493
    @coyh1493 26 днів тому +2

    Luton Town were either Luton Whitestar or Luton Excelsior….
    But that team from Milton Keynes were never Wimbledon….. there used to be a team in the area called Milton Keynes City, but a more appropriate name is the Bletchley stealers…..

    • @Retro-Football-Club
      @Retro-Football-Club  26 днів тому +3

      Luton Town were a completely different club that followed Wanderers and Excelsior. A Wanderers player then went and formed Town, so although there is a link they weren’t the same.
      As for MK, well as a football fan, I get it I do , but putting my YT channel impartiality cap on. we all know they were Wimbledon once, sadly, and that’s well publicised. It’s fair to say AFC are the true successor, but the actual entity became MK ☹️

    • @fwof3347
      @fwof3347 24 дні тому

      Sorry ML Dpns we’re Wimbledon whom I see ply there trade at plinth lane .. with jones, wise cork etc … this new Wimbledon are not the real Wimbledon like to or not … just like arsenal are a south east London team

  • @Antelope6
    @Antelope6 18 днів тому +2

    Didn't Port Vale start out as Burslem Port Vale?

    • @Retro-Football-Club
      @Retro-Football-Club  17 днів тому +2

      Nope. They were formed as Port Vale in 1876, although some dispute they were formed as Port Vale Victoria in 1879. Either way the club didn’t become Burslem Port Vale until 1884.

  • @wimbledan
    @wimbledan 25 днів тому +2

    Wimbledon's original name was Wimbledon old central

  • @johnh9749
    @johnh9749 4 дні тому

    You have really opened a can of worms here!
    Southampton were originally 'St Mary's Young Men's Association'. Southampton St Mary's came a few years later when they joined the Southern League. St Mary's Church is 400m from where Saints now play - hence St Mary's Stadium.

  • @GarryCarr56
    @GarryCarr56 15 днів тому

    Interesting that a lot of teams were formed from church names

  • @mikebirch5816
    @mikebirch5816 24 дні тому +1

    West Brom were a factory team known as The George salter XI

    • @Retro-Football-Club
      @Retro-Football-Club  23 дні тому +4

      Yep, founded as West Bromwich Strollers by workers from the George Salter works. Good little story as well 🤙🏻

    • @mikewilson8513
      @mikewilson8513 10 днів тому

      I didnt know that. And I am from Birmingham

  • @Bolor30
    @Bolor30 22 дні тому +2

    A lot of Rovers…

  • @TIMBOWERMAN
    @TIMBOWERMAN 22 дні тому +5

    MK Don are NOT Wimbledon!

    • @Retro-Football-Club
      @Retro-Football-Club  22 дні тому +8

      Well technically (sadly) the original club were, as much as you or I don’t like it 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @MRTransportVideos
      @MRTransportVideos 20 днів тому +8

      According to the FA, the club in Buckinghamshire were FOUNDED in 2004, at the same time as Wimbledon FC were dissolved, therefore the two entities are legally different, only the players and management transferred to the new organisation.
      The FA subsequently awarded the intellectual property rights, including the complete playing history of Wimbledon FC, to AFC Wimbledon meaning, in the eyes of the FA, AFCW are the legal continuation of WFC.

    • @Retro-Football-Club
      @Retro-Football-Club  17 днів тому

      We are aware. However we all know and it’s common knowledge that MK Dons were Wimbledon. They even played a season as Wimbledon but based in Milton Keynes in 2003-04. So whatever legal papers have been signed to what manor doesn’t cancel out the fact that the club were purchased and relocated. Hence why that’s stated in our video.

    • @MRTransportVideos
      @MRTransportVideos 17 днів тому +1

      @Retro-Football-Club
      Yes, WFC were bought, then WOUND UP, after which all the history and honours of WFC were transferred by the FA to ACFW.
      By the FA's own rules, AFCW are the legal, as well as moral, contiunuation of the club - it's okay, I know you won;t back down or re-edit the video, especially as there were a few other errors (but I'm not going to list them all).

    • @UnbelievableEricthegiraffe
      @UnbelievableEricthegiraffe 14 днів тому

      Move on. Please. It's 2024, not 1994.

  • @craigmcvay1
    @craigmcvay1 27 днів тому +2

    Newcastle East End neverseen there badge before

    • @Krzyszczynski
      @Krzyszczynski 14 днів тому

      According to one account I read, Newcastle East End were formed by the merger of Stanley FC and another club called Rosewood - so which of those two should be considered the original club? To confuse matters further, their ground at St James' Park was originally the home of Newcastle West End, which went bust after a string of poor results.

    • @craigmcvay1
      @craigmcvay1 14 днів тому

      @@Krzyszczynski i nknow aboot West Ens

  • @johnbevins6604
    @johnbevins6604 15 днів тому

    Forest were actually Forest.

  • @craigb3426
    @craigb3426 18 днів тому +1

    Cheltenham Town technically started as Cheltenham AFC, but…meh 😂

    • @Retro-Football-Club
      @Retro-Football-Club  18 днів тому +1

      Interesting can’t seem to find anything on that on main sources.

    • @craigb3426
      @craigb3426 16 днів тому

      @Retro-Football-Club the Trust are finding info out all the time and just very recently discovered that the clubs earliest known game is now 31st December 1884, as Cheltenham AFC, when it had previously been thought the club came into existence in 1887. So, 140 in a couple of weeks time.

  • @shanelenham8736
    @shanelenham8736 27 днів тому +5

    Definitely don't think dial square fc would ever been taken seriously if they kept that name it sounds like a dodgy phone company

    • @tom7131
      @tom7131 27 днів тому +1

      its not that big of a deal, its literally just the name of a workshop within the original players workplace that went on to form arsenal...

    • @Nykona-Sharrowkyn
      @Nykona-Sharrowkyn 22 дні тому

      ​@@tom7131further more, the workshop was at the Woolwich barracks in South East London, that's were the name Woolwich Arsenal comes from

    • @Krzyszczynski
      @Krzyszczynski 14 днів тому

      @@Nykona-Sharrowkyn Weren't they Royal Arsenal as well for a time, before adopting the "Woolwich" version?

  • @MikeDowney-jd1bd
    @MikeDowney-jd1bd 14 днів тому

    Wigan Athletic were Wigan Borough, till 1932.

    • @Retro-Football-Club
      @Retro-Football-Club  14 днів тому +2

      Different clubs, Athletic were formed after Borough folded.

  • @gazbrucia1654
    @gazbrucia1654 24 дні тому

    Chesterfield were originally called Chesterfield Town

    • @Retro-Football-Club
      @Retro-Football-Club  24 дні тому +2

      It was actually called Chesterfield FC, then changed its name to Chesterfield Town. They then went out of business and reformed again as Chesterfield FC.

  • @BlackpoolJohn
    @BlackpoolJohn 23 дні тому +1

    MK DONS WERE NOT WIMBLEDON THEY TOOK THERE HISTORY BUT NOT RIGHT, AND IF ORIENT WAS A CRICKET CLUB SO WAS TOTTENHAM, HOTSPUR CRICKET CLUB, AND ALSO THEY WERE CALLED TOTTENHAM, BUT THERE WAS ANOTHER TEAM CALLED THAT, SO THE HOTSPUR BIT WAS ADDED TO SEPARATE THE TWO.

    • @Retro-Football-Club
      @Retro-Football-Club  23 дні тому +4

      Can you toggle the caps kick off please John 🤣
      As much as we all hate to admit it, they were Wimbledon, it’s well publicised. Tottenham were formed as Hotspur Football Club in 1882 by members of the Hotspur Cricket Club, so kinda correct.

    • @leecollison7527
      @leecollison7527 22 дні тому

      @Retro-Football-Club Pretty sure MK officially renounced the history and all honours back to AFC in 2007, so are in effect a new club

    • @Nykona-Sharrowkyn
      @Nykona-Sharrowkyn 22 дні тому

      ​@@leecollison7527officially, neither MK Dons or AFC Wimbledon have the honours of Wimbledon FC recorded

    • @Retro-Football-Club
      @Retro-Football-Club  22 дні тому +5

      Lee, I think you’re right I think they did renounce it, but in the grand scheme of things they still were technically Wimbledon. Don’t get me wrong if I’m taking my impartial hat off got a second, i absolutely love AFC Wimbledon and what they stand for, and I see them as the correct flag bearer for the old team, however had the original club not relocated they wouldn’t exist. I think it’s one of those things that however you label it, you are going to get people who disagree.

    • @alanslade9240
      @alanslade9240 22 дні тому +1

      ​@Retro-Football-Club at least you aren't allowing their historical rewriting to get in the way of facts

  • @darrencooper5282
    @darrencooper5282 27 днів тому

    Watford were Hertfordshire rangers or Watford rovers

  • @CameraExplorer
    @CameraExplorer 27 днів тому +2

    Liverpool were never called Everton FC and Athletics Ground Company, as the FA rejected the name before it could be registered!

    • @Retro-Football-Club
      @Retro-Football-Club  27 днів тому +3

      Well you just answered your own statement, they were and then had to switch it when the FA refused. Everton Athletic for short 🤙🏻

    • @sentinel8617
      @sentinel8617 27 днів тому +3

      From Wiki
      “Originally named "Everton F.C. and Athletic Grounds Ltd" (Everton Athletic for short), the club became Liverpool F.C. in March 1892 and gained official recognition three months later, after The Football Association refused to recognise the club as Everton.”

    • @carausiusmenapia3219
      @carausiusmenapia3219 20 днів тому

      The press reports of local papers concerning Woolwich Arsenal joining the Football League mention Everton Athletic FC, who were told by the league to change their name. It's in the Woolwich Arsenal history books. Newcastle United joined around the same time.

  • @grahamwood9428
    @grahamwood9428 23 дні тому +2

    Not 100% sure but think Leeds United may have been Leeds City.

    • @Retro-Football-Club
      @Retro-Football-Club  23 дні тому +4

      It was a predecessor but not the same club.

    • @Nykona-Sharrowkyn
      @Nykona-Sharrowkyn 22 дні тому +3

      Leeds City were dissolved due to financial irregularities, including paying players during the first world war, which was banned

  • @robtyman4281
    @robtyman4281 27 днів тому +1

    Well Chelsea FC would still be called Chelsea FC! 🤷😆 ....next ....🤔🤨