yes, BUT NO! This is a reflection on society, more than theft, it is INSANITY that such a process even exists without IMMEDIATE checks and balances in place.
@@sdsbc-z2l if that 0.00001% is just the fact that no charges have be issued in over a year since the seizure then that's all that's needed. If you think the government should be able to seize your property indefinitely with no proof of any crime you might wanna dust of that redcoat and sail back to Britain because this is America and we have rights here.
The property was originally purchased using drug smuggling money. There's a huge difference, to use your words. The "we can[t prove you did, you can't prove you didn't" situation comes into play.
@@fakade2987 All the teachers, doctors, lawyers, great families, kids, and people in America and you choose to support criminals and whine about America. Just move elsewhere if you are so sensitive. We don't want whiny wimps here, you don't provide any value for us.
@@glasslinger If it was then there would be charges. And CITIZENS are not required to prove innocence the police have to prove guilt. Its called innocent until proven guilty. If they have had a full year to try and prove guilt and clearly have nothing that means the couple deserves their property back.
Civil forfeiture should be illegal. It's basically you're guilty until proven innocent so we're going to take the fruits of your guilt. But they don't have to prove you're guilty of anything. YOU have to prove you're innocent.
Especially in this case, where a warrant was issued. They have to charge them, or release the property in 10 days...Gov't has become thieves at this point...
If the legal case was strong enough against them to seize a million dollars worth of property, Scottsdale should certainly have made the case, not the heist.
So the police can take your belongings because they "suspect" you committed a crime but they won't tell you what that crime is? What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
A nifty (for the party doing the seizing) fact about civil asset forfeiture is that they suspect the property to be guilty or proceeds of crime. So it winds up being something like "The state of Arizona VS Mercedes Sprinter Van. And property does not have due process or presumption of innocence. So instead of going after the person for a crime and having to prove their allegations they seize the property and accuse it of being the proceeds of crime or having been used in the commission of a crime and then you have to prove that your property is innocent. I suggest listening to the Institute for Justice or Steve Lehto for tons of interesting facts about what many consider to be legalized theft.
In mesa 2014 this happened to me. My vehicle was taken, my kids were taken and my landlord threw all my stuff away. 4 months later the judge threw my case out of court because there was no evidence of an actual crime. The cops were trying to force me to tell on people and I refused. They said okay, we’re going to ruin your life. And they did.
The battle of Athens Tennessee AUG 1&2 1946. How a stolen local election caused a 6-hour gun battle & then a use of dynamite at a police station to retrieve the stolen ballot boxes & brought justice in 1946 TN & America!!
I relocated my business, sold the rental properties got out of Ariz. Saw a friend go thru this when he was finished with a lawsuit. Piss off the wrong people they will take your life apart
The judge relies on the sworn statements of the police investigators in deciding to issue a search warrant. If the police lie to the judge in order to get a warrant, the judge can't be held liable - the police are liable. All search warrants are issued in this manner.
@@5400bowen - Bad guys would just hide or destroy evidence if they waited to seize after a conviction. I am not referring to this case specifically but in general. The notion of waiting to seize assets unless someone is convicted doesn't work in some cases.
We live in a police state. It seems like every person running for office has to get the blessing of the police unions. Why? Because we live in a police state. The police need to be held accountable for this.
The department of justice needs to investigate the Scottsdale Police Department’s for filing false warrants to seize property that the people was not charged for any crimes against them
Heck in Denton TX cops arrested a retired firefighter on Trump Ted up false charges & he had $80 in his wallet & they took it, took it out of his wallet & said nothing!!
That is wicked weird. This is the first I have ever heard of seized property being released to a non party. Did Mercedes still have the titles? In addition... how does releasing property to a non party further the alleged investigation? This is f'd up.
So why did the original judge write the original search warrant? Isn't that a matter of public record ia diligent reporting team should discover and share?
Violation of the 5th amendment to the US Constitution: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Thankfully, Arizona has such a law. Here in California, the law states 30 days, but for that limit to be enforced, the party/parties whose assets were seized must file a counterclaim, otherwise the asset forfeiture stands. Further, in California, the property itself is the court subject, not the owner. The owner does not have to be indicted, convicted, or even aware that their property was used for illegal purposes. Arizona law is more in keeping with the 5th Amendment than California law.
This is the criminal government simply committing armed robbery. Civil forfeiture should not be allowed unless the suspect is found guilty of a crime that resulted in the gains that were ceased.
"IT'S RARE TO SEE THEM SEIZE THIS MUCH STUFF". I DON'T KNOW WHAT ROCK THAT LAWYER HAS BEEN LIVING UNDER THE PAST 50 YEARS, BUT THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF CASES OF POLICE SEIZING PEOPLE'S ASSETS FOR NO REASON
THAT'S NOT UNLAWFUL FOR THEM TO TAKE YOUR ASSETS! IT'S CALLED CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE PEOPLE! THE GOVERNMENT SAYS THEY USE IT TO CATCH CARTELS BUT WHEN YOU LOOK UP THE STATISTICS, LESS THAN 5% OF CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE IS ACTUALLY USED ON CARTEL MEMBERS. THE REST OF ITS USED ON INNOCENT MEN WOMEN AND CHILDREN JUST LIKE THIS NEWS CLIP
They might want to get an attorney who specializes in assest forfeiture or at least governmental/administrative law. I don't think a guy who keeps a miniature of his 'I'm an ambulance chasing attorney " billboard in his office has the exact skills needed here.
If he's been admitted to the Federal court bar, he's got at least some of the skills. Given the text of the filing, I suspect he's got all of the skills. He covered every base.
I hope they succeed in their suit. Civil forfeiture is a license to steal, without charges, much less conviction. People never charged with any crime then have to go through an expensive and complicated process just to ask for their property to be returned. it's literally a license to law enforcement to steal.
All the property with the exception of $600 dollars all have tracking abilities. I am guessing that is what they are looking at. With that being said the LE must also obey the law, and either arrest or give property back.
THE BATTLE OF ATHENS TENN AUG 1&2 1946. How a stolen local election caused a 6-hour gun battle at a police station to retrieve the stolen ballot boxes and brought justice in 1946 TN & America!!
Decency, security and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that, in the administration of the criminal law, the end justifies the means -- to declare that the Government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal -- would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this Court should resolutely set its face. Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928)
Unfortunately, this is legal and a lot of states, even democratic states, allow it. Basically, you're guilty until proven innocent. It's basically legal theft, because all they have to do is say, "We **think** you're a criminal" and it's up to you to prove you're not. In some police precincts, they get to keep the stolen items...err...I mean, "proceeds", which obviously gives them an incentive to think a lot of rich people are doing illegal stuff.
The police call this freelance shopping and the chief say's theft is acceptable under their force standards and procedures. As long as he gets a taste.
They are proving their innocence by filing this lawsuit. Do you think if they broke the law to acquire the property that was seized that they would be suing to get it back? Think about it.
The money is a "suspect". Not the person and that's why they don't charge the people. You have to prove the money is "innocent" and money has no rights for due process. You can thank SCOTUS for not getting rid of this ridiculousness. BTW, I wonder if an ancillary reason not to charge people is that if you charge them, then the money becomes evidence in a criminal prosecution (instead of civil). When the people are cleared of charges then the money has to be returned.
I wouldn't stop the lawsuit against Mercedes. My question is why did Mercedes take possession and not give them back to the owner or person on the lease. If the cars haven't been given back from Mercedes the question is why not.
Something I don’t get at the end. Couldn’t the couples attorney have given the reason for the seizure? He must know what was in the warrant by now? This highlights how a good law against bad guys can easily be used against the good guys too.
I'm surprised they (cops) haven't given the fed. Gov. Their share. That's why they will never see their stuff again. Maricopa judges ALWAYS rule in cops favor
this isnt a seizure - this a grand theft. period.
Soon as you heard their last names we can all agree they were into crime.
@@Kubush1 The police? Of course! The police.
yes, BUT NO! This is a reflection on society, more than theft, it is INSANITY that such a process even exists without IMMEDIATE checks and balances in place.
@@Kubush1 And as soon as I read your comment I knew that people who ARE NOT bigots or racists would know you are.
28 watches, 3 mercedes, 2 homes. All we know is a few things like this, but you've already crucified the police department. Trump much?
It wasn’t seized, it was stolen. There’s a huge difference.
Obviously you only have 0.00001% of the info of this case lol
@@sdsbc-z2l if that 0.00001% is just the fact that no charges have be issued in over a year since the seizure then that's all that's needed. If you think the government should be able to seize your property indefinitely with no proof of any crime you might wanna dust of that redcoat and sail back to Britain because this is America and we have rights here.
The property was originally purchased using drug smuggling money. There's a huge difference, to use your words. The "we can[t prove you did, you can't prove you didn't" situation comes into play.
@@fakade2987 All the teachers, doctors, lawyers, great families, kids, and people in America and you choose to support criminals and whine about America. Just move elsewhere if you are so sensitive. We don't want whiny wimps here, you don't provide any value for us.
@@glasslinger If it was then there would be charges. And CITIZENS are not required to prove innocence the police have to prove guilt. Its called innocent until proven guilty. If they have had a full year to try and prove guilt and clearly have nothing that means the couple deserves their property back.
Civil forfeiture should be illegal. It's basically you're guilty until proven innocent so we're going to take the fruits of your guilt. But they don't have to prove you're guilty of anything. YOU have to prove you're innocent.
Especially in this case, where a warrant was issued. They have to charge them, or release the property in 10 days...Gov't has become thieves at this point...
Abolition of private property -Marx
100 percent agreed!
What happens when Democrats run things
100%
If the legal case was strong enough against them to seize a million dollars worth of property, Scottsdale should certainly have made the case, not the heist.
Well said.
What Case???🥴
We have investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong.
Every single time….amazing….
If you are a cop and seize cash or property, you are a thief, nothing more
The whole damn lot is a criminal organization.
@@wvp07 it sure seems like it
This happens all the f'n time here. It's legal robbery
the blue wall of silence and corruption
And incompetence.
if you live to be 100 you will never meet a more dishonest person than a cop.
A democrat.
@@AccountInactiveyour political affiliation is your identity. 🫵🏾🤣🤣🤣
@@AccountInactiveor maybe just another functionally illiterate MAGA shill hater 🤣🤣🤣
You could live to be two and still accomplish the same thing
Include Politicians and Preachers
So the police can take your belongings because they "suspect" you committed a crime but they won't tell you what that crime is? What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
They don't even need to suspect you of a crime. It's called civil asset forfeiture.
A nifty (for the party doing the seizing) fact about civil asset forfeiture is that they suspect the property to be guilty or proceeds of crime. So it winds up being something like "The state of Arizona VS Mercedes Sprinter Van. And property does not have due process or presumption of innocence.
So instead of going after the person for a crime and having to prove their allegations they seize the property and accuse it of being the proceeds of crime or having been used in the commission of a crime and then you have to prove that your property is innocent.
I suggest listening to the Institute for Justice or Steve Lehto for tons of interesting facts about what many consider to be legalized theft.
In mesa 2014 this happened to me. My vehicle was taken, my kids were taken and my landlord threw all my stuff away. 4 months later the judge threw my case out of court because there was no evidence of an actual crime. The cops were trying to force me to tell on people and I refused. They said okay, we’re going to ruin your life. And they did.
The Blue Gangbangers
Eye for an eye buddy.. it’s pretty easy to ruin a cops career if you play your cards right.
How are you now ?
The battle of Athens Tennessee AUG 1&2 1946. How a stolen local election caused a 6-hour gun battle & then a use of dynamite at a police station to retrieve the stolen ballot boxes & brought justice in 1946 TN & America!!
I saw a video of Mesa AZ cops pepper spraying a group of young teen girls at a Quinciera & cussing them out as well!!
Have yet to see one good thing about Scottsdale PD, MESA PD and Phoenix PD in Arizona
That's because there are none.
Agreed, except I'd rank them Phoenix, Mesa, Scottsdale. Think the DOJ would agree.
That is real truth my friend! ❤
I relocated my business, sold the rental properties got out of Ariz. Saw a friend go thru this when he was finished with a lawsuit. Piss off the wrong people they will take your life apart
If you don’t like it move to a more liberal state
Any judge that signs a warrant like these is a criminal. Clear violation of due process.
The judge relies on the sworn statements of the police investigators in deciding to issue a search warrant. If the police lie to the judge in order to get a warrant, the judge can't be held liable - the police are liable. All search warrants are issued in this manner.
@@d.c.3220with no criminal charges filed?!? Get real. No seizures until after a conviction, period.
@@5400bowen - Bad guys would just hide or destroy evidence if they waited to seize after a conviction. I am not referring to this case specifically but in general. The notion of waiting to seize assets unless someone is convicted doesn't work in some cases.
@DC- but they haven't even been charged yet, what Bad Guys are you talking about?
@@d.c.3220 what, the cops can't watch them? Oh, that entails work...
Just grabbing people's assets. A year later, there is no criminal charge and they still haven't returned their property?
We live in a police state. It seems like every person running for office has to get the blessing of the police unions. Why? Because we live in a police state. The police need to be held accountable for this.
You are correct. Read John Whitehead's A GOVERNMENT OF WOLVES: THE EMERGING AMERICAN POLICE STATE.
@@dicezart9667 blah blah blah
You're so radical.
You should have used the word police quite a bit more to make the point.
My reply, "You are correct. Read John Whitehead's A GOVERNMENT OF WOLVES: THE EMERGING AMERICAN POLICE STATE," was censored.
The department of justice needs to investigate the Scottsdale Police Department’s for filing false warrants to seize property that the people was not charged for any crimes against them
The federal government gets a cut out of this.
And the DOJ is more corrupt than the local government. The local criminals learn from the Federal criminals
@@jool5941Where’s your evidence? Oh you’re just confusing random opinion with fact?! 🤣🤣🙈
You mean the department of injustice.. it’s ran by democrats who want nothing more than everything you own.
@@jool5941the federal government gets nothing from the states civil asset forfeiture program.. were you homeschooled?
End civil forfeiture.
and Citizens United and Qualified Immunity
And begin learning our rights.
End qualified immunity. End police unions.
Insane that's a million dollar heist
Kansas cops pulled over an armored car and stole "seized" the money.
GTA 5 - In reverse!
@@christophero1969😂
Thin blue line gang is getting paid.
Stop civil asset forfeiture
Civil Asset Forfeiture implies that there is no LEGAL method or reason for any citizen to possess more than $100 in cash.
I've seen ppd roll an old homeless man for $40.
Heck in Denton TX cops arrested a retired firefighter on Trump Ted up false charges & he had $80 in his wallet & they took it, took it out of his wallet & said nothing!!
This evil has to stop.
Better get to stopping it then if you want it stopped.
@J.Green-Rx bad bait.
Welcome to the USA. Freedom. What a concept.
It's not a concept. You are free to do whatever you want. But it will cost you
That is wicked weird. This is the first I have ever heard of seized property being released to a non party. Did Mercedes still have the titles?
In addition... how does releasing property to a non party further the alleged investigation? This is f'd up.
Happens all the time. Heck the #1 movie on Netflix right now is a guy retaliating against cops who stole all of his money.
So why did the original judge write the original search warrant? Isn't that a matter of public record ia diligent reporting team should discover and share?
Violation of the 5th amendment to the US Constitution:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
All of your civil rights are a fantasy. You're a prisoner/slave in your own country.
So? They don't care.
Article 1 section 10 constitution
It is theft - just because it's legal doesn't transform it into something else.
The number one movie on Netflix is about this scam
Name??
@@audraarndt1824there's another documentary called
"Tarnished Badges"
it's about internal corruption in police departments.
Rebel ridge?
Name of film?
@@HughJass-313 Rebel Ridge
So unconstitutional
Stolen.
People need to vote out every politician at every level that supports civil forfeiture, starting with Scottsdale mayor.
"Police are required to return seized property within 10 days if not charged"
ITS BEEN OVER A YEAR. 🙄
Thankfully, Arizona has such a law. Here in California, the law states 30 days, but for that limit to be enforced, the party/parties whose assets were seized must file a counterclaim, otherwise the asset forfeiture stands. Further, in California, the property itself is the court subject, not the owner. The owner does not have to be indicted, convicted, or even aware that their property was used for illegal purposes. Arizona law is more in keeping with the 5th Amendment than California law.
We only have our supreme court of the united states to thank for cops and judges doing this....
Where are the good cops inside Scottsdale speaking out about this?
This is the criminal government simply committing armed robbery. Civil forfeiture should not be allowed unless the suspect is found guilty of a crime that resulted in the gains that were ceased.
Welcome to red flag laws .
No trail, just accusations
What probable cause was behind the warrant ?. The rubber stamping by judges must stop
"IT'S RARE TO SEE THEM SEIZE THIS MUCH STUFF". I DON'T KNOW WHAT ROCK THAT LAWYER HAS BEEN LIVING UNDER THE PAST 50 YEARS, BUT THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF CASES OF POLICE SEIZING PEOPLE'S ASSETS FOR NO REASON
Government has become the MOB
Any more I fear the police and justice system more than the other criminals.
THAT'S NOT UNLAWFUL FOR THEM TO TAKE YOUR ASSETS! IT'S CALLED CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE PEOPLE! THE GOVERNMENT SAYS THEY USE IT TO CATCH CARTELS BUT WHEN YOU LOOK UP THE STATISTICS, LESS THAN 5% OF CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE IS ACTUALLY USED ON CARTEL MEMBERS. THE REST OF ITS USED ON INNOCENT MEN WOMEN AND CHILDREN JUST LIKE THIS NEWS CLIP
thieves with badges
I've seen law enforcement tell victims if you sign here, we keep the property, and we agree to not prosecute you. That's so B.S.
Police should be forced to pay interest for the property as well.
They might want to get an attorney who specializes in assest forfeiture or at least governmental/administrative law. I don't think a guy who keeps a miniature of his 'I'm an ambulance chasing attorney " billboard in his office has the exact skills needed here.
If he's been admitted to the Federal court bar, he's got at least some of the skills. Given the text of the filing, I suspect he's got all of the skills. He covered every base.
Damn, the police walked in their home with a shopping cart.
No different then highway robbery.
In some cases, literally.
I hope they succeed in their suit. Civil forfeiture is a license to steal, without charges, much less conviction. People never charged with any crime then have to go through an expensive and complicated process just to ask for their property to be returned. it's literally a license to law enforcement to steal.
It's a joke to go to court and play their game for literal monopoly money.
Crooked Cops in Aridzona? No kidding!
Worldwide
The fact that they only want the property tells all. If there was actual suspicion of a crime they would want the people too.
I hope the lawsuit gives them their property, the city,county and state gdp as punitive damages
This is exactly why everything I own isn’t in my name.
Keep us posted on the lawsuit.
NO FURTHER NEED TO REMIND ME ---- I AIN'T EVEN GOING TO DRIVE THROUGH AZ MUCH LESS MOVE THERE.
The news stations care so much and work extremely hard for everyone. Yeah, right.
All the property with the exception of $600 dollars all have tracking abilities. I am guessing that is what they are looking at. With that being said the LE must also obey the law, and either arrest or give property back.
You have to sue to get it back and pay lawyers ungodly fees.
THE BATTLE OF ATHENS TENN AUG 1&2 1946. How a stolen local election caused a 6-hour gun battle at a police station to retrieve the stolen ballot boxes and brought justice in 1946 TN & America!!
It's official I don't live in America anymore. The really disturbing part is where they don't have to explain themselves.
Judges in Amereica need to follow the Constitutiton and not their bias. in 2025 any judge found violating the Constitution will be fired and jailed.
Including SCOTUS!
Decency, security and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that, in the administration of the criminal law, the end justifies the means -- to declare that the Government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal -- would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this Court should resolutely set its face.
Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928)
Arizona cops doing someone wrong???
Say it ain't so!!!
Let me talk with the DOJ and see what they say...
😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮
Legal system not a justice system
Are there any legitimate police departments in all of Arizona?
The taking of personal property like this by law enforcement is theft, nothing less.
Twice, the Scottsdale PD treated me unfairly and its part of the reason I left that beautiful city.
Unfortunately, this is legal and a lot of states, even democratic states, allow it. Basically, you're guilty until proven innocent. It's basically legal theft, because all they have to do is say, "We **think** you're a criminal" and it's up to you to prove you're not. In some police precincts, they get to keep the stolen items...err...I mean, "proceeds", which obviously gives them an incentive to think a lot of rich people are doing illegal stuff.
How'd they get the warrant in the first place?
Lies !
Since when do the police follow the law? Certain doesn't happen in AZ!! LEOs have become the occupying force our forefathers warned us against.
How a judge signed off on this is just crazy. Someone should get fired.
Seizure for SUSPECTED crime - that is criminal in itself.
And there are judges that are ok with this. Nothing will change until we start holding cops, lawyers and judges accountable.
It's called theft and tyranny
Bet someone in the house pissed off a higher up in the department or an official.
THE JUDGES ARE IN ON IT.............I WANT MY END,,,,,,,,,NOW
The police call this freelance shopping and the chief say's theft is acceptable under their force standards and procedures. As long as he gets a taste.
I now will no longer admit that I once lived in Scottsdale.
I’m glad more Americans are waking up and seeing what the police actually are
The worst part is that this can happen anywhere in the US.
Race may have been a factor.
Ah...freedom at its finest
Wow this should not take years to be resolved
They are proving their innocence by filing this lawsuit. Do you think if they broke the law to acquire the property that was seized that they would be suing to get it back? Think about it.
Theft
The money is a "suspect". Not the person and that's why they don't charge the people. You have to prove the money is "innocent" and money has no rights for due process. You can thank SCOTUS for not getting rid of this ridiculousness. BTW, I wonder if an ancillary reason not to charge people is that if you charge them, then the money becomes evidence in a criminal prosecution (instead of civil). When the people are cleared of charges then the money has to be returned.
No charges? What's to litigate? Obviously suspected of something really bad. So many questions.
Wow call the Scottsdale police and tell them to return it and to stop this theft
road pirates at work
Anyone in Arizona 😮
I wouldn't stop the lawsuit against Mercedes. My question is why did Mercedes take possession and not give them back to the owner or person on the lease. If the cars haven't been given back from Mercedes the question is why not.
People need to exercise their second amendment right against a tyrannical government.
ron reagans baby, civil asset forfeiture, stomps all over the 4th amendment
Thongs change scent from one end to the other. Knowledge is power. God bless
Racial motive the name are Spanish and how they can have that that is the ego show for the police
It's you. You are the one seeing race. I have a Spanish surname, too. Pure Alinsky-speak drivel.
Theft is never legal regardless of who steals it. And if the PD had a real case, they’d have spoken with the press
Something I don’t get at the end. Couldn’t the couples attorney have given the reason for the seizure? He must know what was in the warrant by now?
This highlights how a good law against bad guys can easily be used against the good guys too.
Armed robbery. The police should be charged with a crime and held accountable at a more sever level.
The thin blue line of tyranny
IT WAS EASY TO BY A COP AND A JUDGE IN NEW ORLEANS IN THE 60s...........
I'm surprised they (cops) haven't given the fed. Gov. Their share. That's why they will never see their stuff again.
Maricopa judges ALWAYS rule in cops favor
Let us know how much this costs the taxpayers.