Interview with Anthropologist & DNA Expert Todd Disotell (Bigfoot DNA?)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 чер 2024
- An interview with noted NYU professor, biological anthropologist & molecular primatologist Todd Disotell about Sasquatch, his work in examining alleged Sasquatch DNA samples and various related subjects.
Taken at the 3rd annual International Cryptozoology Conference in Portland, Maine in September 2018.
Todd Disotell: todddisotell?lang=en
Video brought to you by the Living Among Bigfoot book series:
www.amazon.com/Living-Among-B...
Copyright © Aleksandar Petakov/Petakov Media 2018.
Dr Todd...you talked for almost 20 seconds without blinking. You scare me.
He’s a droid. C3PD’OH
No witness reports, physical evidence, trace evidence, photographic evidence is proof. Even if one was standing on my foot, I wouldn't believe it because I am just a guy who has never been in the woods and my mind is very small and closed to anything outside normal existence being real because my mind couldn't cope with that kind of reality..,
Typical "I know everything better" asshole. Bet never left the boundaries of NYC. Wonder how would he explain Jeff Meldrum's collection of 300 footprint casts? Or ThinkerTunker's analysis of Patty's walking/biomechanics.
Too bad he's a not a hiker. Imagine him coming face to face with a Sasquatch but no one would believe him. That would be poetic justice.
Zman888 Absolutely. Sadly. Most of these guys never leave the lab.
Hamish was being ironic, these replies reflect people who didnt get the joke
Never give your Bigfoot DNA to an anthropologist with a mowhawk in a Hawaiian Shirt
Matthew Coolness notice that his shirt has a likeness to the Bluff Creek video squatch.
I love that his favorite Cryptid is the mapinguari.
Nothing against Todd.
But he said don't even breath on biological evidence.
And yet there are people convicted of a crime, just from a cigarette butt, that was on the ground.
Or even in a garbage can.
Come on now! Something just not right .
As long as you have the DNA of the collector. You can determine that it's different from the specimen.
If not there is a whole lot of people that should be released from prison. Lol.
You’re absolutely right.
Breath detectors for alcohol
Speed detectors for traffic
Fingerprints
And DNA evidence are all Bunk science. You can google each and find they've been exposed as a scam
Same reason they did away with lie detectors, torture, and lynchings ...well, the developed world anyway
@@uncannyvalley2350 OK. You try telling the judge or jury that the fingerprints at the crime scene and the DNA found are Bunk. See how that defense works for you.
@@macioluko9484 too lazy to use google huh champ?
Great video, disappointing to hear 100’s of samples tested with zero dna of unknown origins discovered. I sure hope Doug Hijiack’s LMS2 produces a positive hit.
I took an Anthropology class in college and Prof was a bit of a wack job - good Prof but a wack job none the less. First he tells us not to make jokes, and the next three lectures was on cosmology - like, how hard is it to define a term? About a 1/3 of the way through he is telling us about people who were born with tails; now, you have to know me, but I said, "Wow, talk about monkeying around!" The class went dead silent, and he looked at me like I had just hit him in the head with a baseball. I thought he just kidding about that humor shit. Like I said, he was good Prof, I got straight A's. However, the best I can tell is that the field is one you have to "get with the program" or go find something else to do. Personally, I think the field is a dead science - there I go with the humor again.....
Someone tell Bigfoot this guy doesn't believe in him, I'm sure he'll be devestated.
If the topic is beneath you, consider losing the charm and I just noticed the shirt did you pick out that ensemble yourself wtf??
The gatekeepers of knowledge.
When we listen to a guy from NYC, tell me about what is existing in earths most remote areas, thats a problem. This guy is either lying or he's not in "the loop" of the real dna. Am sure he has not stayed weeks in remote areas
he said he has found No DNA that wasn't something explainable like coyote , bear, or human. The problem is, bigfoot is a human. So no big surprise that he found that. I guess if it is not an ape it can't exist. lol
fasterman3 What the Dr. didn’t know, was the hair sample that was sent to him come from another lab to rule out the sample being from any know species first, and before it was sent to him.
Dude is wearing a Sasquatch t-shirt and necklace. So...are you a believer or not ? Your advice is sound (get good pics or videos, get physical evidence without contaminating it).
Like his shirt, good video.
People: do you have DNA evidence of Sasquatch?
Expert: nope.
Rhabdo B Then they can’t read, or are biased in some manner.
Did mr. Disotell ever tested samples that resulted in human-contamination? If so, he probably thrown away real evidence without even knowing it. And if he ever succeed having "real" unknown DNA, which scientifical journal would publish his results? How much his career would be affected? Sometimes brilliant man are not that smart...if you know what i mean. Anyway , love your channel & much respect to you! a fellow believer from the north of the boarder⚜. ✌
Dear Idiot: (1) human DNA in samples: he said he did, in the video (2) contaminated DNA is worthless and is thrown away (3) if he had solid biological evidence of an unknown animal any journal would publish the paper (4) he'd be a superstar in his field if he discovered an unknown animal. Learn something real before your brain turns to jelly and you're drooling out of one side of your mouth, if that hasn't happened already.
@@amaxamon i believe they did send a report for publishing and they wouldn't do it...
If a geneticist tried to publish evidence to prove the existence of Sasquatch, it is likely their career would be systematically destroyed.
@@herenow2895 LOL No, that's not how science works. Apply at Walmart, save your money and then buy a clue.
@@amaxamon - No, that's not how science should work. But when it comes to this topic, sadly it is the case.
Academia is renowned for being dogmatic.
LIAR!