Judge FURIOUS! Lawyer Lied To Judge Over Rent that was Supposed to be Returned to Tenant!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 чер 2024
- Note for UA-cam's review team, here is the context of the video: this is an educational video based on actual court cases. Our goal is to educate the public, inform our audience, and raise awareness.
#contemptofcourt #court #cringe #funny #judge #karen #law #lawyer #trending #zoom
🛑As a reminder, everyone featured on this channel is to be presumed innocent until proven guilty🛑
Join this channel to get access to perks including Members Early Access and Access to the Members Only Discord:
/ @mrzfieldz.official
WANNA BE IN THE LOOP WITH CHANNEL UPDATES? COME VISIT ME ON TWITTER.. DM'S ARE ALSO OPEN! / mrzfieldzprollc
CASH APP: $MrzFieldzYT
PAYPAL: @mrzfieldz
AMAZON WISH LIST! www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls...
Intro And Outro Music:
Intro: "We kick it like no one else" By Gloria Tells
Outro: "Times Like These" By Andrew Galucki - Розваги
I want to be a judge solely to be able to tell people not to interrupt me and they have to listen 😂
Mr Dunn went every shade of embarrassment/anger in the space of less than a minute after she dismissed the case.
It was hilarious to watch.
Older gentleman lawyer looks like Wolfred Brimley.
Congrats to you for getting more cases from this Judge! Major SCORE, Mrz. Fieldz… and Thank You!
Mr Dunn just got shot out of his saddle. 😂😂
Mr. Dunn needs to attend court in person. I don't know if it's due to a delay, but he's constantly interrupting or talking over people.
Mr Dunn done got spanked by the judge.
"I can't tell you how strongly I disagree with that position" is my new favorite phrase. I love this judge.
Thanks Mrz Feildz for finding great new Judges !!! ❤😊
I do not understand the ruling. Why should he return funds for the months they stayed there? Why would filing a new eviction not be sufficient? Can anyone help me please?
Judge was way off base. Different cases the first one was defective and the second one was sound and should have moved forward. Now he has to either force his client to refund money to a tenant so they can sue to reclaim properly that has been properly noticed twice.
The problem is the clean hands doctrine. They brought a case despite representing to the court previously that they would do something and they did not.
Also for hold over evictions (at least in my jx) if a month to month tenant tenders rent and it is accepted, then the contract is renewed for another month. So for a hold over, the LL cannot renew the lease by accepting money. They can ask for it in a judgement, but accepting means the lease renews and new termination notices must be sent. That is why it is a fatal defect to eviction petitions. It's contact law (which I like because of how clean cut things can be with it😊)!
@@ajarfullofjoy No
The judge is essentially holding the attorney in contempt without a show-cause and in doing so punishing his client more than him. The judge should not be punishing the client who has a proper case before her if she feels slighted by the lawyer from a previous case.
The other case is not technically over if all parties hasn't done what the judge ordered in that dismissal! So starting a new action before the other is done is not accepted by the court!!
@@davidhallberg I'm guessing from the back and forth it was never recorded as part of the order. While the court can issue oral orders it gets messy quick when the case is dismissed.
She should have done a show-cause and continued the new case which was properly before her.
I'd love to see this judge deal with a sov cit 😅
Lawyers actually lie in court?😆 I think they would lie even if the truth sounds better.
I love the word executrix
Me too 😂
Bloody hell, I thought ol mate Dunn was gonna have a heart attack.
Gwen Horton hears a Who
I just don't understand staying somewhere you are not wanted.
Often there isn't an affordable alternative.
Landlord tenant cases are all over the place!!
wow 425 a month! u seriously couldn't afford that lol
@@WW-hn5yb $425 a month is not even close to "rich" 🤦🏼♀️ that's less than half of a normal adults biweekly check.
Lie lawyer go together ask Madea
New judge love it
Briarwood should have updated the documents to reflect the new failure to pay rent -- they are still out of pocket for months. He can refile immediately for the new dates.
Ooooh... Mr Dunn done lied so Mr Dunn is done! .....
Love the Judge…let’s have more. What court ie, County/State is this?
this is jefferson county, KY .. i try to catch her as much as i can but its really hard to catch her cause she bounces around courtrooms. i have never seen a court ran like jefferson county.
@@mrzfieldz.official Thanks much… be vigilant for us.
Judge Jennifer Leibson, Jefferson County, KY
Love this Judge. Would like to hear cases other than tenancy !!! ❤
This is my brother carl and my other brother carl. By the time they get through probate court the house would have been dealt with.
I love your channel so much. It is my go to channel during the day. I am generally a night owl, so I am a bit Court Vibes fan, but I love the fact that you are the one who brought back DiSanto and your material is always so interesting. I just wanted to tell you why I subbed and that I have recommended you to everyone who would listen and that I think you are great!
Not sure why she dismissed the case @15:00 It was a new notice so anything from prior is irrelevant (or so I thought)…in fact, if they were tenants before the 2nd notice they would still have to pay rent. So why give it back? I think she got that all wrong…but I’ll wait to see if someone can correct me because there may something I misunderstood…
Why don't people hire attorneys? 🙄
Because they can’t afford it!
It costs thousands of dollars, which you usually have to pay upfront. Most Americans cannot afford to hire a lawyer.
Do you have any idea how much an attorney costs??
Attorneys are often unnecessary because 95% of evictions are straightforward and require no special legal knowledge. They also often lack the sense of urgency that landlords have in recovering the property.
In my state, the going rate for an uncontested eviction is $750. If you keep decent records, you can save $500 and have your paperwork ready in less than 15 minutes.
Please tell me what this judges UA-cam channel is titled. I can’t find it anywhere and she’s awesome!
unfortunetly, this judge does not livestream. This is one of the judges that i get straight through the court.
@@mrzfieldz.officialkeep posting her. She is fabulous.
You can find the zoom links on the court’s website
@@momsterzz please dont use the courts zoom as a livestream... if even 50-100 people start bombarding the courts zoom? it will become a problem. We have to remember that this is court and zoom is supposed to be used for court, not as a livestream.
Always get an attorney people!! Landlord or tenants…
Absolutely correct
Iv had to do probate with my first husband passing and it's a process
Why do you have a watermark in the middle of the screen that doesn't move or anything? That's going to leave a burn-in image on people's TVs especially if they watch more than one video.
lol my watermark is transparent, its not in the same place in every video, and not all videos have a watermark. plus, all screens are different and image burn in can happen on one while not on others. there are many factors that can cause image burn in. but a watermark like mine and many others used on many bodycam footage videos is not something that usually causes image burn in as they are low contrast images. keeping your brightness down can significantly reduce the chances of image burn in as well.
I apologize if the watermark is bothersome to you but watermarks are only on videos that i obtain off youtube and are not livestreamed anywhere. like judge simpson clips dont have a watermark because he livestreams on youtube for anyone to use. i have to use a watermark for a number of reasons so i can not remove the watermark. im usually willing to compromise on most viewer requests but my watermark is not something i can get rid of... but, like i said, i only use a watermark on clips that are obtained directly through the court and arent livestreamed.. like judge disanto and judge liebson.
Looks like he's part of Barnett Porter and Dunn in Louisville KY.
Are you allowed to rent out your garage to people for living quarters in the states? 😳😳 surely there would have to be a ruling by the council that it was indeed habitable?
No Willy nilly in court!
Good morning !
I love this judge!
I think Mr Dunn was unprepared but she was also misunderstanding. The tenant was however months behind, the first eviction was filed but then payment for the missed months was accepted. They got behind or were still behind on rent so they filed another eviction. It happened to be for the same reason but was another new case. They didn't return the previous rent payments because they applied it to the back payments due. She still owes however much because she's behind. If he had all of those details, it wouldn't have been dismissed.
I'm not a lawyer, but I believe the intent of the law is that once you begin with eviction proceedings you can no longer collect rent, including to cover the missed rent because that should be sorted out as a judgement as part of the eviction. You have two legal paths:
1.) File for eviction and recover the missing rent via judgement - but the tenant has protections against unaffordable judgements in collections
2.) Allow the tenant to try to make good on their obligation - the tenant gets to stay, but does not have the protections of collections because they are voluntarily paying
But you can't mix the two, because you can't try to collect both via the contract and because of breach of the contract. So in theory the landlord could have returned the money, then sued for that same money, but they can't keep it while suing.
And that's an important tenant protection because you can imagine a landlord allowing a tenant to pay their last dime every month to catch up on the lease, but then evicting them anyways and them no longer being able to afford rent at a new unit and becoming homeless. Whereas if they had tried to evict in the first place and refused the rent the tenant could set aside money for their new rent and pay the judgement over an affordable payment plan.
Did that Judge say they are getting a FREE Atty to handle the first issue? What else do they expect tax payers to flip the bill on?
No, she was saying a free attorney APPPOINTMENT. As in, they'll give a free appointment to find an attorney.
@@Mewse1203 Ahh, gotcha. Thanx.
Love this judge!
Please tell me where to find this court. Landlord tenant in ky is so important to my work.
Great judge !!!!!
Awkward
Whats this judge's name? I like her
I guess this judge just hates landlords? Fifteen minutes in and she's already dismissed three evictions...
Frequency illusion. A judge handles a lot of cases in a day. If you go pro se on an eviction you're looking at a lot of paperwork that you will screw up. The other, the attorney admitted they didn't return the money after saying they would. That is bad stuff.
I'm with the oatmeal guy, why should the money be returned, why should they get to live rent free? The judge is saying that for case #1 for Sept. Oct. and Nov. dismiss the case because rent was accepted. Im not 100% in agreeance with the law but that the money should be returned. However she also said case #2 for rent after Nov. which was not paid should also be dismissed, thats not right.
Yea it’s a funny part of the law that often favours the tenant - if a landlord calls for an eviction, it’s no longer valid if they continue to accept rent, and evictions can take a long time so some tenants get to just live for free for a while. It’s actually a common scam. I know they always says these ‘greedy landlords’ always have the upper hand but that’s just not the case, and not all of them are huge companies, many landlords are mom and pop operations that pay their mortgages with the rent payments. I think judges never really want to see people get kicked out unless it’s a last resort, however, it’s no secret that there are squatters and scammers out there that take advantage of the laws. Also, I’ve noticed, some judges seem to favour landlords and some favour tenants, you never know with the type of judges and prosecutors coming out of the Biden admin as of late…
You had me right up until the very end…
Lmao quaker oats man
So the first case is a "hold over" case, not a non payment case. So depending on your jx, there are different statutory notice periods a LL must give to terminate a lease. This is because, what usually happens at the end of a lease, practically, is a new lease isn't signed and they just keep going. Because of this contract law assumes at the end of a lease term, the lease may be renewed under all the same terms as the original except that it will become a month to month tenancy. This is evidence by a tenant offering money and the LL accepting which equals a contract. If a LL wants to evict based on something other than breaking the lease terms or non payment, it is a hold over. So during the statutory notice period (in my jx you get between 30-90 days depending on how long the tenant has lived there). If the LL accepts payment they are renewing the lease and the notices would have to be resent. That is why it is a fatal defect to a petition, statutory notice period has not actually elapsed of you have been renewing the lease. The rent for the time the tenants remain in the property should then be part of the petition/complaint as a kind of liquidated damages type of things. It's been awhile since Ive done any housing work, but that is what I remember.
The whole doctrine is actually to protect regular ppl who might not think they need to sign a new lease each time. It protects all of the original terms is the lease. In reality, it is a doctrine that makes everyone's lives a lot easier.
Judge: "you must do X, Y, and Z."
Litigant: "So I do A, B, and C?"
No.... you do what she told you to do.
As a landlord the judge is wrong with the guy red shirt. A 30day notice is absolutely LEGAL. wow!!!! Shes wrong with the case about giving $$ back...
This judges attitude and demeanour is terrible.