I understand Gelsinger actually had balls and vision and did indeed implement the right radical changes, but likely he came in too late facing an almost impossible task. Is that fair?
Hard to say. Many of us including myself continue to see endless leadership issues though in day to day life there. So makes me wonder if leadership needs to be overhauled.
Pat claimed 18A is healthy defect rate, so HVM is 2-3 quarters away. BroadCom came out publically saying 18A yields were very poor. So Pat lied about the true health of 18A, thus the Board had enough.
The Board should fire themselves. I watched Meritocracy disappear around 2014, and "Diversity is our Strength" insanity, take over. Along with that, Otellini missed the bus on providing a procesor for Apple's iPhone, Krzanich appointed a non-engineer to lead TMG and obvious successors left, someone passed on the latest DUV, the 2016 layoff occurred in the middle of a DEI push, Swann bought back millions of shares, for a temporary pop on the stock price. Gelsiger was tossed onto a trainwreck, already in full crumple, as one could see the logic processor CPU getting smaller compared to the GPU(s) of the chipsets.
Yes the DEI trainwreck is coming for Tsmc too they currently getting sued for discrimination. Fat chance lazy low IQ Americans hillbillies can do semiconductor engineering
I think Intel's best bet is to focus on manufacturing and collaborate with other industry players, rather than trying to compete with TSMC. Partnering with Nvidia could be a good strategy.
I can't wait to see what happens in the future. I thought Intel should show innovation that challenges it with a bit of a new look. It's nice that he's leaving the company in a bright light. I'd like to see him work actively elsewhere.
Ousting Gelsinger is just one move (way overdue!). Next, is the change in culture (where was the innovation???). After that, what is the identity of this company??? Intel products or still carry forward with the foundry business which has become the Achilles heel for this company.
I understand Gelsinger actually had balls and vision and did indeed implement the right radical changes, but likely he came in too late facing an almost impossible task. Is that fair?
Hard to say. Many of us including myself continue to see endless leadership issues though in day to day life there. So makes me wonder if leadership needs to be overhauled.
Pat claimed 18A is healthy defect rate, so HVM is 2-3 quarters away. BroadCom came out publically saying 18A yields were very poor. So Pat lied about the true health of 18A, thus the Board had enough.
Retire 🚫 Fired ✅
I would say intel currently occupied with people who do politics and marketing rather than qualified engineers and staffs.
The Board should fire themselves. I watched Meritocracy disappear around 2014, and "Diversity is our Strength" insanity, take over. Along with that, Otellini missed the bus on providing a procesor for Apple's iPhone, Krzanich appointed a non-engineer to lead TMG and obvious successors left, someone passed on the latest DUV, the 2016 layoff occurred in the middle of a DEI push, Swann bought back millions of shares, for a temporary pop on the stock price. Gelsiger was tossed onto a trainwreck, already in full crumple, as one could see the logic processor CPU getting smaller compared to the GPU(s) of the chipsets.
Yes the DEI trainwreck is coming for Tsmc too they currently getting sued for discrimination. Fat chance lazy low IQ Americans hillbillies can do semiconductor engineering
I think Intel's best bet is to focus on manufacturing and collaborate with other industry players, rather than trying to compete with TSMC. Partnering with Nvidia could be a good strategy.
This is Family Feud Special :
*Name the people **-Retire-** (Fired) by Intel .....Twice !*
I can't wait to see what happens in the future. I thought Intel should show innovation that challenges it with a bit of a new look. It's nice that he's leaving the company in a bright light. I'd like to see him work actively elsewhere.
Ousting Gelsinger is just one move (way overdue!). Next, is the change in culture (where was the innovation???). After that, what is the identity of this company??? Intel products or still carry forward with the foundry business which has become the Achilles heel for this company.
retire or be retired? that is the question
He was retired "effective yesterday" which is a Sunday. Who the eff retires on a Sunday without notice or successor?
Good riddance.
How convenient, after running the company to the group