Ollie ? The QURAN is ALSO VERY clear that even ALLAH "Allocated all that land" unto the Jewish People ! ! "Allocated unto The CHILDREN OF ISRAEL !" Surah 10:93 ! There is not even any RELIGIOUS disagreement with that FACT
@BarneyGimble That's not what is being said. The quran n Torah are historic documents thousands of years old that reveal the fact that the jews existed on that land. There is jewish history of existing in that land 3000yrs ago, They were conquered repeatedly on that land and even Roman history reveals all of it and how the jews were occupied. The Arabs conquered the land and built their mosque ontop of the Temple mount. The jews came back and bought land back in British palestine and even the partitioning of the land by the UN reveals separation mainly based on where each group resided (which was logical ) . Each group could have self governed themselves before the constant rejection by the Arabs. It's an unfortunate situation especially because the leaders from Iran etc want complete annihilation of the state of Israel. Sad situation for both sides. Complex.
if they happened after the signing of the post WW2 conventions they are illegal - sorry you are not aware that the law changed after the world agreed to stop killing people for land.... even more sorry Israel still thinks it can kill people for land and get away with it!
If I were them, I'd ask for God's blessing too. It'd be badly needed. This way I'd dare ask myself the right questions, like ... Is everybody else an assh*le in the world and not me? Or, is it me? So, yeah, I agree: God bless Zion and The Illegal Occupation Fiends.
This video on international law concerning the territorial dispute between the Arabs and the Jews definitely helps to clear up a lot of the confusion projected by the Left wing propangada media.
@@stephendoherty981 Religion. It's all about Allah, and the "pigs and monkeys" and the gall of the Jews to own land that has already been conquered by Islam
Each and every day History lessons on what we know and defend. But maybe it is important to revise the History of the Jews for some reason that I don't understand. Reason will prevail I hope.
@@stephendoherty981Jordan lost a war of aggression. By international law Israel has no obligation to return the land that Jordan unlawfully occupied in the first place. A similar reason is why Germany lost land after the Nazi regime was defeated.
@@stephendoherty981international law isn't being applied correctly. As correctly stated in the video, the west bank was not sovereign territory of any country, and it was illegally occupied by Jordan in the 1948 arab Israeli war, started by the Arabs, then taken by Israel in the 1968 war, again started by the Arabs. Arabs keep trying to wipe out Israel yet Israel are the bad guys? Wake up to ur anti semitism fool
I've watched "Settling the Facts." Didn't know you created and produced it! Very impressive!!! Thank you for that film because it establishes the fact that there should be no dispute when it comes to "settlement." 👍😊
Putting 3000 years of Jewish settlement in the region and international law aside, the law of conquest alone gives Israel the right to Judea and Samaria
The Law of Conquest?? Haven't heard of that law. Sounds like one of the laws of the jungle when humanity was swinging from trees. You'll be surprised to know that humanity has come a long way since then and we now have things like international law😮😮😮😮
@@stephendoherty981 yeah, it goes way back, far longer than "international law". In fact it goes back to the first time a tribe decided their neighbor had a better cave than they did and decided to take it. But more recently have you heard of the Paris Peace Conference or the Potsdam Conference? How many borders were rearranged? Maybe the Cyprus emergency in 1974? Perhaps Crimea and Ukraine in the last few years? If you try to be clever without knowledge you will get punked
Israel is entitled in law to the West Bank. There has never been any such thing in law as Palestinian land. There never was a state of Palestine. When the Romans conquered the Jewish kingdom of Judea, destroyed the Jewish temple, and drove the Jews of Judea into exile, the Romans renamed it PALESTINA in an attempt to erase its Jewish identity. When the last colonial occupier of the land the Ottoman Empire fell after the first World War, the international community that carved out the Middle East to create a number of new states and countries kept the name Palestine to describe the territory which was now to be recreated as the homeland of the Jewish people. You can find on the map of this period Jewish Palestine and Arab Palestine. This was cemented at the 1920 Sano conference and given the force of international treaty law by the League of Nations in the 1922 mandate for Palestine. Britain then sliced 75 per cent off this land to create Trans Jordan or what is now known as Jordan. Palestine consists of what is now Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza. To make this quite clear, only the Jews were given the legal rights to settle the land in what is now known as Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza.That right has never been abrogated. The 1922 League of Nations mandate was ratified by the United Nations Charter of 1945, which pledged to uphold the agreement made by its predecessor, the League of Nations. The legally binding principle entitling the Jewish people to settle on all of this land was subsequently further codified in the Vienna convention on the law of treaties of 1969, which confirmed that it included Judea and Samaria ie the West Bank and Gaza. Between 1922 and 1948, "when people refer to the Palestinians, they were referring to the Jews." One reason why the term "occupied Palestinian territories" is a nonsense (Take note ignoramuses) is that "the areas in question were never Palestinian lands but was always legally designated for JEWS ALONE to be entitled to settle." When the UN finally declared the land of Israel, the Arab armies immediately attacked. This was the Israeli/Arab War of 1948 when the Israelis were forced to defend themselves from annihilation. Israel is not in "illegal occupation" of the Palestinian territories. Anyone that says that is "legally illiterate." The Jews are the only people entitled in law to those territories. Reference: melaniephillips.substack.com/p/why-israel-is-entitled-in-law-to#:~:text=Israel%2C%20which%20inherited%20the%20sovereign,Israel%20that%20were%20illegally%20detached
Really the Jewish kingdom of Judea was conquered by the Romans. I think you will find the Jewish kingdom was long gone by the time of Rome conquering the area under pompey. Alexander be great conquered the Persian empire which covered what would now be Israeli West Bank etc, and then had the Seleucid empire after Alexander the Great. Cannot be bothered to go back further then that but was well before Roman Empire.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 When you have to reference that unbridled Zionist shill , Melanie Philips, for 'facts' you've lost all credibility😂😂😂😂😂. In case it's escaped your notice, the highest court in the world has just the other day said the West Bank does not belong to Israel but is Palestinian. Oh, sorry, I forgot. Israel doesn't recognise International law. My bad🤢
Palestine was coined by deceased ex PLO leader Arafat to support his political agenda against Israel. He was expelled from Egypt and Jordan. He was an Egyptian
Even if it wasnt int law its still ours..there u go in a nutshell. Spoken by a brittish person with no ties to the land..farcical.. at the very least..
@@tomgallagher7870As are farcical all these Irish haters of Jews who have no ties to the land and no true knowledge of the situation, and indulge in visceral hatred.
@@maltija1 the difference is im not claiming to own the land.oh dont worry its not just my country most of the world is on the right side.let me guess im anti semetic?nope.one of my friends is jewish.he has the maturity to see both sides.so can i.i believe everyone should have a home.just not at the expense of others.as for my knowledge .i know enough ive watched for years.your having a go at me?i would like to see a two state solution.the brittish guy?he wants every bit of the land?see the difference?..
@@tomgallagher7870 And how many times has a two-state solution been offered to the "Palestinians" and they've always rejected it? Their own foundational religious texts make it a "holy" mission to wipe out Jews. Sahih Muslim 2922. Even a "moderate" "Palestinian" political entity like the "Palestinian Authority" has never published an Arabic charter that didn't call for the destruction of Israel. 70% of the "Palestinians" supported the Oct 7 attacks (The PALESTINIAN Center for Policy and Survey Research). And how are adherents of other faiths doing at the hands of the the adherents of the "religion of peace"? "Christian persecution in the Middle East reaching 'genocide-like' levels" - BBC 3rd May 2019. Both Judaism and Christianity originated in the Middle East and pre-date Islam but both have just about been wiped out. Israel is the only country still with a discernible Jewish population. Don't know how long it's going to be before people wake up and realize the Islamists do not want people of other faiths living amongst them (at least not as equals).
@@lylarose2696 AMEN, to think Palestinian Muslims are in charge of our saviors birthplace. My sisters family went to visit , said Israel beautiful BETHLEHEM under pals is filthy. My Mexican American Brother in law said “ I wouldn’t buy shit from them” meaning palestinians. Asked why they have soooo many children they can’t afford the men said “Allah will provide” ! No all European and American taxes pay for feeding their offspring. They are perpetual and generational welfare recipients!
@@practice4523 The ICJ’s decision is an advisory opinion and has no direct legal consequences on Israel or other UN member states, but it could be another blow to the Jewish state’s international standing and add political pressure over its devastating nine-month-old war against Palestinian terror group Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Israel did not take part in the hearings, instead submitting a written contribution that described the questions the court had been asked as “prejudicial” and “tendentious.”
Was the Six Day War started by the Arabs legal? Regardless, the land they (Jordan, Egypt, etc) lost to Israel in a defensive war *_cannot_* be called illegally occupied. And what's more, Jordan and Egypt seized (aka illegally occupied) the West Bank & Gaza respectively, in 1948-50 following the first Arab-Israeli war.
The latest decision, which was made just last week at the International Court of Justice, is going to change the law, so that we will no longer be able to claim such rights. This is what happens when things are delayed and postponed.
There is no such thing as the West Bank, it's Judea and Samaria, the most central area besides Jerusalem, Zion, to the Jews and it belongs to the Jewish state of Israel forever
@@GE7274 Land thieves always look back to the past to justify their thivery. There are no excuses to steal someones home, only that made up by the thieves themselfs.
@@practice4523 Keep "practicing" false history. True history: There were no Arabs, let alone Muslims when the Jewish people first came to the land circa 3000 BCE
The problem is that the ruling is made on laws that didn't imagine in a million years a people would start a war, lose, get occupied and then refuse for the next 57 years to sign a peace treaty. On that basis, if Germany or Japan after WWII had refused to sign a peace treaty accepting their defeat we would now be illegally occupying them which is bonkers crazy. If the Arabs in the occupied territories don't want to be occupied they have the choice to accept defeat, sign a peace treaty and move on. That they don't means they choose to be occupied.
What you are saying would at least make some sense. Problem is this is not the reality - West Bank was never taken in a war from the State of Palestine, because that one did not proclaim independence until 1988, and it's till this day still not a sovereign state eligible for UN membership. When Israel proclaimed independence in 1948 all of the Mandatory Palestine territory was incorporated to Israel based on the "Uti possidetis juris" rule of international law, therefore West Bank is Israel territory that was occupied by Jordan 1948-1967.
@@Zbychoslaw666 hey mr 666, Izrayil has not annexed the West Bank, hence it doesnt belong to Izrayil. This case was litigated in court and Izrayil lost, learn to accept defeat
@@practice4523 There is no need to annex West Bank, because it never ceased to be Israel territory - occupation and annexation by Jordan was illegal according to international law, and international community, including the Arab League. The same situation exists in Ukraine, when Russia occupied and annexed Crimea, but it is still considered Ukrainian by the international community.
The legal principal of estoppel means that the Jewish National Home, from the River to the Sea, as per the 1922 Palestine Mandate and endorsed by UN charter article 80 is still in force. The ICJ, like the UN, is under Sharia. There is no 'Occupied Palestinian Territory' just arab squatters who need to leave.
@@sergeantzack1106 That's true, so where's the fairy tale? Palestine never has been a state, and isn't currently, while Israel has been three times now.
Here in the Netherlands we have Anarchists who place stickers everywhere stating "No human being is illegal" claiming that any human has the free right to live anywhere, but this universalism somehow has a single exception, Jews living in Judea and Samaria.
God who created heaven n earth promised this land for His chosen people when God put something in place noone can say otherwise...God of Israel is in control
I can say otherwise - for example I could say that your God is a made up fairy who does not exist and has no authority over non-Jews and that the idea of being God's chosen people is just a narcissistic delusional fantasy.
" Israel has absolutely no need to bind to International Law. " - Ehr, not exactly. "States may choose to not abide by international law, and even to breach a treaty but such violations, particularly of peremptory norms, can be met with disapproval by others and in some cases coercive action ranging from diplomatic and economic sanctions to war" - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law Israel and the USA acted as rogue states and they saved theirselves thanks to the veto by the USA at the security council otherwise you would have seen a way more serious situation. By forcing the non-recognition of the international laws a nation can be expelled (as a member) from the UN. It is not requested only because it would be a waste of time due to the veto by the USA but things can go differently if they continue that way. Israel would not risk to be expelled since it exists thanks to its presence at the UN that used time ago as formal recognition (while still illegally self-declared, on the base of false promises). Time to study, kiddo, no matter israel/palestine.
They can't. It's all antisemitic Israeli denying optics. Am Israel Chai. Special gratitude to the Jews living in Judea and Samaria, the aboriginal ancestral heartland.
another point that never came up in this video to why israel has the legal fight of not only the West Bank, but also gaza, and that's the strong principle of uti possidetis juris in international law. its kinda interesting how anti semites seems to allways wanna deny the jews rights that's commonly accepted in the rest of the world
The Jews did have the right to Gaza, but they formally renounced any claim to that land in 2005, same as they did with Area A of the West Bank a decade earlier. Those places are really the only true “Palestinian land” now, but it was a mistake for Israel to give them up, in hindsight, because all that’s resulted from it is ten times as much terrorism against them.
I speak Arabic and I don’t need this translated. I can tell you this video is full of ziosplaining to try to warp laws and facts. Notice how they added the imaginary word “forcefully” to the law where it doesn’t exist, and how they said that territory can be taken through “defensive” war. Actually the law says territory cannot be taken through “war,” not just “offensive war,” implying neither defensive nor offensive war can result in taking land. And of course it wasn’t a defensive war when israel fired the first bullet, but that’s another story.
Most of the "Arab World" was taken through conquest. Most recently all the borders of modern middle-eastern nations, which resulted from war with the Ottomans. @someone35354
@@leonardoarmandoiarrusso1225 four: you will also need to disappear megiddo, masada, the city of David and of course countless other artefact. Like my Judean coin 2,400 years old ...
@@leonardoarmandoiarrusso1225 I will try two again and see if it stays up. I will paraphrase it: use your izz Raily phone to look up ancient synagogues Golan, similar for Galilee Jordan etc etc.
the British Mandate for Palestine was the original 2-state solution. the Jewish state is Mandatory Palestine (i.e. Israel, gaza and the WB) and the Arab state is Jordan
So by their standards, the Australian government and Australians who are not indigenous to Australia are also in violation of international law and must forfeit the land of Australia?
As a Jew, I don't care whether or not Israel has a legal right to Gaza or the West Bank. The reality is that between the PA and Hamas, the Palestinians do not have the ability to effectively govern these lands and there will always be a threat to Israel. With that said, give Gaza back to Egypt and the West Bank back to Jordan. In other words, no two state solution.
The "West Bank" ie Judea and Samaria wasn't Jordan's to begin with. Nor did Gaza belong to Egypt, they were occupied by both through war. Once the Arabs calling themselves Palestinians settled there, neither country wanted them back - they wanted Israel to deal with the problem, or perhaps they wanted to keep having an excuse to blame Israel for things it hadn't done.
I agree that it extends beyond rights to the land; as a nation Israel also has the right to security. That’s the reason they occupied the West Bank and Gaza to begin with. If my nation, Canada, was crawling with terrorist groups, constantly firing missiles at random civilian targets in the US, and regularly making deadly incursions across the border to massacre and kidnap civilians, I’d say we more than deserved to be occupied and even annexed by the US. Having an autonomous state comes with certain obligations, and one of them is to not attack or invade other nations other than in self defense. When a nation does that, and subsequently lose the war they started, they forfeit their own sovereignty rights.
On that day the Lord made a covenant with Abram and said, "To your descendants I give this land, from the Wadi of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates - the land of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites, Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites and Jebusites." - Genesis 15:18-21. Isreal as far as the most neighbouring countries belong to Isreal.
correct, almost all jews shown on screen attest to this promise God gave to Abraham, very few on screen argue this, shows who believes God n who believes God's word
The Bible is just a story about religion, it dosn't give the descendants of Abraham the right to murder those who now live on that land. The ten commandments teaches you not to murder, steal or covet your neighbours possessions, when will you follow the teachings given.
@@keithappswhen we reach the new heavens n new earth, tis why when peeps say genocide they have no idea, how many tribes were completely destroyed, I believe it was Andrew Jackson who tried to completely decimate, genocide all Indians, but here on this earth we will never get our lands back,
Claiming land inhabited by other people for thousands of years based on religious stories written down by your supposed ancestors (but more likely the ancestors of the Palestinians who live there) is laughably ridiculous, if it wasn’t for the tragic and cruel treatment of the indigenous Palestinians by Israel settlers. If Jews have an absolute and exclusive right to inhabit Israel (and just what extent is biblical Israel?) then surely they have no right to inhabit any other part of the world. That was the concern of Lord Montague, the only cabinet member and only Jew in the cabinet, to argue, vehemently, against the making of the Balfour declaration in 1917. His concern was that by creating a Jewish homeland to solve a European problem (anti-semitism), it would take citizenship away from Jews in the many countries they inhabited. This was prescient. The world map looked very different 2000 years ago. Trying to roll it back on the basis of traditional stories has been nothing but a delusional colonial project that has and continues to cause untold tragedy. Only when all people have equal rights and religion and ethnicity play no part in that can Jews or Arabs have any peace in the region. I am ashamed at the role both European Christianity (the origin of anti-semitism and Zionism) and British imperialism have had in promoting the Zionist project for mistaken geo-political benefits.
West bank refers to the West bank of the Jordan River from the perspective of that piece of land belonging to Jordan, which it does not, if it did, then the Palestinians would have EVEN LESS claim to it. In truth, the "West bank" is Eastern Israel.
God’s everlasting covenant was for Jewish people to be given all of this land. By all religious and historical doctrines, it is clear the land from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea and through to the Euphrates River, including Gaza, belongs to the Jewish people
If we are going for "precise", it's time we replace "two State solution" with "three State solution". 3/4 of former British Palestine was given to the Arab Palestinians. The land was conveniently renamed Trans-Jordan and later Jordan. The British appointed an Arab/Muslim monarch - who's family is still in power today. There already is a "Palestinian" State. And why is 3/4 not enough?
Because muslims want to turn the whole world muslim. at least that's what they say in Arab mosques. If it was about land, they would've kept bitching at the Jordanians as well.
Notice how the palestinians or at least hamas keep calling israelis yahoods when a good chunk of them are muslims. It's not about land, it's about how the supposedly superior muslims keep losing to lowly yahoods.
Thank you for helping us be more informed so that we can support our side in dialogue. (However I've never doubted Israels rights for a nano - second, of course) 🇬🇧 💙 🇮🇱
This is not a ruling but a flawed opinion that carries no legal weight. It was deeply flawed in that it ignored many fundamentals of international law. It was also highly biased not least by having an anti-Israel presiding judge. There was a dissenting opinion that more accurately reflected the position but this got little to no coverage. The UN has unfortunately become an anti Israel forum. It is high time for it to look more closely at itself and stop allowing anti Israel nations from using it for their own political ends.
Literally not even two minutes into the video and he already admits he doesn't respect or even care about international law. God says this is mine (or at least I think God says that) so it's mine.
It says in the Torah that the Jews are to welcome the stranger. I dont see that happening when christains and muslims are being spat on punched , and beaten by Orathdox jews, these events have been viewed on video's.
"...the Terrorist organizations build up from our own ranks. I am not willing to see anybody associated with those misled and criminal people;" Albert Einstein
This is only referring to an area of land, but there are people living on that land and have been living on that land as the majority for at least 1000 years. Where do they go? If Israel incorporates the land, do these people who call themselves as Palestinian become full citizens of the state? If not what would be their status be?
@@stephendoherty981 Did we really progress? Ukraine, Congo, Syria, Yemen, Israel, Iran, Gaza, Sudan, Central African Republicl Nigeria all have some sort of civil wars going on. Ans how many countries did the West invade the last 20 years? Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya.... Humans hardly ever learn.
What it comes down to, in the long term, is who has the strength to hold the lands against all comers. So Israel had better stay very strong and able to defend its possession. The world agrees on only one thing, the hatred of Jews. Historically, over and over, many peoples have taken the same tired land. The Cannanites, the Jews, Egyptians, Assyrians, Greeks, Romans, various European Crusaders, the Turks, the English and now, the Jews, once again. I hate that might means right, in our world, but it’s a truism along with the universal hatred towards Jews.
no where in the bible does it say that we cannot have a country and that we have to wait for the Messiah. You are welcome to quote the verse, i'll wait.
@@amaterasu22able ask a non-Zionist rabbi and he will fully explain it to you. That is why the Israelites did not return to the holy land as a group for 2000 years.
@@dfwtransport2420 No. You made a claim, back it up or retract it, don't send me to "do my own research". Provide proof to your claim or admit that you are just repeating senseless propaganda made by anti-semites.
@@dfwtransport2420 most rabbis are zionists. Except the tiny minority of ultra radical cult Neturei Karta, banned from all rabbinic circles and that nobody takes seriously but other radicals who use them in their own radical agendas. And Israelis are zionists (even Arab, Druze Israeli citizens support zionism) and 90% of Jews worldwide support zionism and so do many non-Jews. I’m from First Nations Canada and support zionism and ISRAEL 100%
@@dfwtransport2420always has been a longstanding Jewish presence in JUDEA AND SAMARIA, cradle of JEWISH civilisation (renamed by the greco-roman ‘Palestina’ by Romans) and constant return throughout history despite foreign invaders. YERUSHALAYIM, Holiest city of the Jewish people was 80% Jewish in 1864 (Ottoman Turk occupation census) before massive @ROB (feudal clans, nomads etc from all over) came flooding in by the hundreds of thousands after Jews bought land from absentee landlords and developed it and also came flooding in after the fall of Ottoman Turk occupation during the British Mandate….50,000+ @rob migrants came (many illegals) even in the 1930s+ according to the 1937 Peel Commission Report.
It really is wild reading people who think settler colonials have the right to a land because of religious beliefs based on a text that has been demonstrated over and over, through archeology, to have almost zero historical truth in it. Fact is that in the land of Canaan/Judea/Palestine, many religious beliefs have been followed as times and culture changes. This was the polytheism that was practiced up until 3rd or 4th century BCE, 2nd Temple Judaism forced upon the locals by elites returning from Persia (and many who remained there to form the Jewish communities that were a huge part of the rich tapestry of Iraq and Iran. This also included the many who converted to Christianity and then those Jewish Christians living in Arabia who then formed Islam. What is also a fact, is that genetic studies show that the modern Palestinian population is the same population that has lived there for at least 4,000 years. Whereas the modern Jewish populations are partly descended from that old population, but also a mix of the genetics from the areas they have settled. This is true for Ashkenazi Jews, Arabic Jews and Sephardic Jews. Just because your family continued to follow a religion that was one of the most common at a certain period, or you converted or married into that religion, does not give you rights to that land. It is not saying you could not migrate there, it is saying you can not move there on mass and form a nation on the ashes of the towns you have ethnically cleansed. Even if Palestine is able to finally form a nation in a two-state settlement, it won't be the end of it. This will continue until all refugees and their descendants are granted right of return and their homes are returned to them.
@TheBlackThorneKnight With new archeological evidence it's a toss up between Iraq and Iran. Just being sarcastic. Jews have always been present throughout the entire region
Has the ICJ declared the Russian occupation (and settlement) if the Crimea illegal? Has the ICC declared the Turkic occupation and settlement of Constantinople(1456) and the entire Anatolia peninsula illegal and that it should be returned to the indigenous ethnic Greeks with Turks returning to Central Asia? Should Koernigsberg be returned to ethnic Germans? etc. etc.
Crimea has always been considered part of the Ukraine and over time has been conquered by the Mongols, Ottomans and Russians. In 1991 when Ukraine gained independence the majority of the population was not Ukrainain, yet under international law it became part of the Ukraine. In 2014 Russia occupied and annexed Crimea. Despite its demographics, history of being part of the Russian/USSR empire, and a population that prefers to be part of Russia, Crimea by international law is Ukraine. Should the Ukraine re-take this land and over time Ukrainians move to Crimea they would simply be moving from one part of the country to another. There cannot be one set of law for Israel and another for other countries.
You are conflating something that is nothing related to Israel's legal right to the land ... forget the fact that Judea and Samaria is the aboriginal lands of only one people .... the JEWS. But even if Jews never ever lived in the land (which is an absurd concept), under INTERNATIONAL LAW, the and belongs to Israel.
@@practice4523 This is bullshit a nd everyone knows it. The leftists like you are desperate but I have to tell you that Israel is strong, Israel is in the right, Israel will never give up, Israel is forever. What do you think the "ramifications " are? There are no ramifications ...LOL.
You mean a court whose head judge has frequently come out against Israel in the past and that said-judge's own home country (Lebanon) supports a militia (Hezbollah) that seeks Israel's destruction. You mean that totally "unbiased" and "impartial" court?
The ICJ is impotent in actual fact and besides, they are an izlam pandering organization. What is the outcome .... ZERO. Antisemitic Israel denying tw@ts can go hike on their own bile :) Am Israel Chai.
Yishai Fleisher compared 🇮🇱☪️ Israel Vs Arab to 🇹🇼🇨🇳Taiwan Vs China. Now I a dual 🇵🇭🇭🇰 citizen compare 🇮🇱🇵🇸🇪🇬🇯🇴 Israel Vs Palestine, Egypt, Jordan to 🇨🇳🇭🇰🇲🇴🇵🇹🇬🇧 China Vs Hong Kong, Macau, Portugal & the UK. Why doesn't Israel just 'annex' Gaza & West Bank and give Israeli 'citizenship' to all the people, BUT you DON'T give Israeli 'residence'? Cf I have 'Chinese' 🇨🇳 citizenship but only HK 🇭🇰 residence. I can't ordinarily study, work or live in mainland China or Macau. And most importantly, HK & Macau have NO MILITARY. Lol. This way Israel proper is 'mainland Israel' and then Gaza & West Bank will be 'special administrative regions'. Get a governor like Chris Patten. Maybe Mosab Yousef, Luai Ahmed, Yoseph Haddad, Imam Abdullah Antepli or the guy who said 'We must take down the heads of Hamas. Don't leave this place.'
@@KathyPrendergast-cu5ci because only an Izrayili would ask "What court?" Since they are Hasbarad from a young age to believe that the only courts that matter are in Izrayil and all the gentile courts are out to get them
@Base612 VP Julia Sebutinde reminded the court about law ‘uti possidetis juris’ which includes JUDEA AND SAMARIA ,cradle of Jewish civilisation as part of Israel. The rabbid anti-Israel Lebanese judge didn’t like that lol
Useless clip. The historical (indigenous) right to land is tragically wrong - it leads to wars and it's always disputable. Try to find something smarter!
There's more to this. The Jews have not just randomly migrated there. Before 1948, they received the Balfour Declaration that promised them sovereignty. They bought lands and only then won more territory through wars that they did not start but were subject to.
@@misuroz2093 ... its the Jews land. you guys prove it something else, the f*ck... they proved it 3500 times plus no f*cking duh... lets say screw all of that... Did Islam win any of the wars in the past 100 years? You want it? stop lying and try to take it like a f*cking man.. oh wait they did and lost... OVEr and OVer... they lost and the dont get another Pakistan. Over the next few years they BETTER learn it.
I’m an Israeli. If we’re ever going to have any stability we need to leave Judaea and Samaria alone. The settlers here are creating problems for all of us. I don’t give a shit about what is legal and what isn’t. This has been Arab land for generations . Israel needs to respect that as the Arabs need to respect the land where most Israelis live. Two peoples live here. We need to respect each other.
Sounds great but let’s not forget it’s a brainwashing those Arabs have gone through about us Jews. From children to adults. This means if you leave them alone there is more then enough chance we will face the same tragedies all over again. Israel must govern Judah and Samaria in my view.
They’re not expelling them. They’re just taking farmland and whatever else suits them. The settlers are just as fundamental as any other religion. And what has that got to do with Islam in England.
@@raygrange7312 You seem to think areas should only be one religion and Jewish people shouldn't be in muslim land but you don't have a problem with Muslims on Christian land? Do you know what hypocrisy is? Let's make comparisons to pakistan?
Ah yes, who do you think know more about international law? someone who dedicate their entire life to study about law and have no reason to bias in favour of one side, or someone who literally says he doesn't actually care about the international law in his opening.
@@FelixLaManna First off, we believe in god and do what he telling us to do and second, unlike you christians we didn't created a "New" set of commandments
In accordance with the laws of war with Israel's victory in 1967 over the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip legally belong to Israel, like Turkey in Constantinople and China in Tibet, they invaded and victory
While I believe many people are aware to the rights of Jews to judea and sumeria, we have to be smart about it. If the icj, un, etc demands those areas returned, its not an entirely bad thing, Israel can return it to jordan, take out our security measures along the jordan valley and disconnect the areas from our infrastructure. Thus making the palestinians s jordanian problem. Now jordan got a terrorism problem, the saudis have a terrorism problem, but israel have disconnected from it and only need to hermetically seal 1 border instead of many. Any aggression from the palestinians would become aggression from jordan, which is a sovereign state and israel can act accordingly. The icj and their mates cannot complain much because we have turned the palestinian problem into an issue for the arab states instead of ours. How long before they'll come and ask israels help? Or collapse and allows other forves to take over?
I get where you're coming from, but there are some major issues with that plan. First, Jordan has already given up claims to the West Bank and isn't interested in taking on more people. If Israel stops securing the Jordan Valley, it could seriously strain relations with Jordan. Without Israel's security measures in the Jordan Valley, the terrorism problem could get worse, not better. Jordan might try to close the border, but that's not guaranteed. Plus, terrorists could use the high ground to launch more serious attacks, beyond just stabbings and bombings. The West Bank's higher ground gives a strategic advantage. If we pull out, weapons and fighters from Syria and Jordan could flood in, threatening our people, land, and water. If we leave the West Bank, does that mean we should also leave the Golan Heights? That would hand strategic high ground to Syria, which is super risky. Leaving settlements isn’t just about security; it’s also about our right to be there. Abandoning them could undermine the historical connection of Jews to these lands and disrupt agreements like the Oslo Accords, leading to more instability and legal challenges. Sealing the borders and cutting off services would likely cause a humanitarian crisis. The international community would condemn Israel for this, leading to diplomatic isolation and possible sanctions. While it might shift the problem, it could actually make things way more dangerous for Israel without solving the core issues. In short, while your idea tries to shift the burden, it could create a much more dangerous security environment for Israel, with less control and more threats on the ground.
Enjoy the impunity for now but tides are shifting. The older crowd only view legacy media which lies and hides the truth. The youth accesses alternative media and sees the whole picture.
@McCraeMoto1 there never was an ethnic group called Palestinians ever recorded in history. ‘Palestina’ is the old greco-roman renaming of JUDEA AND SAMARIA, cradle of Jewish civilisation, by Roman invaders. Romans referred to the Phillistine seafaring invaders from Agean Islands (GREEK) beaten by Egyptians and that occupied a small area near the sea (Phillisia) and were worst enemies of Israelites. Phillistines were wiped out thousands of years ago! In Hebrew, ‘Plishtim’ means ‘invaders’ ‘unholy’ ‘uncultured’
2:30 non binding resolution and legal standing are two different things. A resolution can be non binding and still be a part of the corpus that we call “international law”. I’ll add that general assembly resolution are binding they are just not enforceable. Get your facts straight
Ollie ? The QURAN is ALSO VERY clear that even ALLAH "Allocated all that land" unto the Jewish People ! !
"Allocated unto The CHILDREN OF ISRAEL !" Surah 10:93 !
There is not even any RELIGIOUS disagreement with that FACT
So what other Quranic verses do you want to enforce?
@BarneyGimble whataboutizm of the highest puke. Don't put words in his mouth, he stated a fact.
@BarneyGimble
That's not what is being said.
The quran n Torah are historic documents thousands of years old that reveal the fact that the jews existed on that land.
There is jewish history of existing in that land 3000yrs ago,
They were conquered repeatedly on that land and even Roman history reveals all of it and how the jews were occupied.
The Arabs conquered the land and built their mosque ontop of the Temple mount.
The jews came back and bought land back in British palestine and even the partitioning of the land by the UN reveals separation mainly based on where each group resided (which was logical ) .
Each group could have self governed themselves before the constant rejection by the Arabs.
It's an unfortunate situation especially because the leaders from Iran etc want complete annihilation of the state of Israel.
Sad situation for both sides. Complex.
@@GilbertdeClare0704 what else does Quran say about Jews?
Or were you elected cheif Rabbi of Quranic exigency?
@@GilbertdeClare0704 I hope your argument in the International criminal court is "Quran says occupation is cool"?
That would be hilarious
I wonder when the ICJ is going to declare that Russia's occupation of Königsburg and Poland's occupation of Pommerania are illegal?
if they happened after the signing of the post WW2 conventions they are illegal - sorry you are not aware that the law changed after the world agreed to stop killing people for land.... even more sorry Israel still thinks it can kill people for land and get away with it!
God bless Israel and the brave men and women of the IDF.
@@Noel-p8y Brave? Killing mainly women and children?
A cruel joke, I suppose
How do you know god bless Israel .god talking to you
If I were them, I'd ask for God's blessing too. It'd be badly needed.
This way I'd dare ask myself the right questions, like ... Is everybody else an assh*le in the world and not me? Or, is it me?
So, yeah, I agree: God bless Zion and The Illegal Occupation Fiends.
🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
This video on international law concerning the territorial dispute between the Arabs and the Jews definitely helps to clear up a lot of the confusion projected by the Left wing propangada media.
And not a single one of the wars waged on Israel by Arabs was ever about land. That's just a red herring.
@@maltija1What was it about then? I'm fascinated to hear your reply!
@@stephendoherty981 Religion. It's all about Allah, and the "pigs and monkeys" and the gall of the Jews to own land that has already been conquered by Islam
@stephendoherty981 The Arabs one and only goal is to exterminate the Jews, they aren't subtle.about that fact at all.
The Arabs only goal has been the extermination of the Jews. That's been their goal since the beginning. The Nakba originally
Is beyond me that every single day Israel have to explain the same thing.
Well, you do have some serious explaining to do, in fairness!!😂😂
Each and every day History lessons on what we know and defend. But maybe it is important to revise the History of the Jews for some reason that I don't understand. Reason will prevail I hope.
@@Libby_Jana They're just blocking their ears and wearing blinkers. It's not worth the effort.
Bcos they think if they do so, they can get more people to believe these lies.
@@aliciafletcher9739 Amen, sister!
This goes round and round STOP attacking Israel
Stop stealing land
@@practice4523
Judea and Samaria are part of Israel …
@@ofrapeters3952 In your dreams yes, but by law, no
@@practice4523
Not a dream.. it’s the reality ..
@@practice4523Nobody stole land, it is legally Israel. All Israeli individuals who own land BOUGHT it.
Israel has rights for Judea and Samaria
No it doesn't. International law has just reaffirmed that you don't!
@@stephendoherty981UTI POSEDEITIS JURIS
@@stephendoherty981Jordan lost a war of aggression. By international law Israel has no obligation to return the land that Jordan unlawfully occupied in the first place. A similar reason is why Germany lost land after the Nazi regime was defeated.
@@stephendoherty981ILLEGALLY = NOT LAW ●
@@stephendoherty981international law isn't being applied correctly. As correctly stated in the video, the west bank was not sovereign territory of any country, and it was illegally occupied by Jordan in the 1948 arab Israeli war, started by the Arabs, then taken by Israel in the 1968 war, again started by the Arabs. Arabs keep trying to wipe out Israel yet Israel are the bad guys? Wake up to ur anti semitism fool
I've watched "Settling the Facts." Didn't know you created and produced it! Very impressive!!! Thank you for that film because it establishes the fact that there should be no dispute when it comes to "settlement." 👍😊
Putting 3000 years of Jewish settlement in the region and international law aside, the law of conquest alone gives Israel the right to Judea and Samaria
@@KMN-bg3yu wow the acquisition of land by war is illegitimate
On this channel i can clearly see jws are becoming n a zi’s
The Law of Conquest?? Haven't heard of that law. Sounds like one of the laws of the jungle when humanity was swinging from trees. You'll be surprised to know that humanity has come a long way since then and we now have things like international law😮😮😮😮
@@stephendoherty981 🙏😎👍🇵🇸🗝️
@@stephendoherty981 yeah, it goes way back, far longer than "international law". In fact it goes back to the first time a tribe decided their neighbor had a better cave than they did and decided to take it. But more recently have you heard of the Paris Peace Conference or the Potsdam Conference? How many borders were rearranged? Maybe the Cyprus emergency in 1974? Perhaps Crimea and Ukraine in the last few years? If you try to be clever without knowledge you will get punked
@@KMN-bg3yu your example for legitimacy is Russia invading Ukraine hahaha 😂 😂😂😂 ok you’re not a member of civilization
Israel is entitled in law to the West Bank. There has never been any such thing in law as Palestinian land. There never was a state of Palestine. When the Romans conquered the Jewish kingdom of Judea, destroyed the Jewish temple, and drove the Jews of Judea into exile, the Romans renamed it PALESTINA in an attempt to erase its Jewish identity. When the last colonial occupier of the land the Ottoman Empire fell after the first World War, the international community that carved out the Middle East to create a number of new states and countries kept the name Palestine to describe the territory which was now to be recreated as the homeland of the Jewish people. You can find on the map of this period Jewish Palestine and Arab Palestine. This was cemented at the 1920 Sano conference and given the force of international treaty law by the League of Nations in the 1922 mandate for Palestine. Britain then sliced 75 per cent off this land to create Trans Jordan or what is now known as Jordan. Palestine consists of what is now Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza. To make this quite clear, only the Jews were given the legal rights to settle the land in what is now known as Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza.That right has never been abrogated. The 1922 League of Nations mandate was ratified by the United Nations Charter of 1945, which pledged to uphold the agreement made by its predecessor, the League of Nations. The legally binding principle entitling the Jewish people to settle on all of this land was subsequently further codified in the Vienna convention on the law of treaties of 1969, which confirmed that it included Judea and Samaria ie the West Bank and Gaza. Between 1922 and 1948, "when people refer to the Palestinians, they were referring to the Jews." One reason why the term "occupied Palestinian territories" is a nonsense (Take note ignoramuses) is that "the areas in question were never Palestinian lands but was always legally designated for JEWS ALONE to be entitled to settle." When the UN finally declared the land of Israel, the Arab armies immediately attacked. This was the Israeli/Arab War of 1948 when the Israelis were forced to defend themselves from annihilation.
Israel is not in "illegal occupation" of the Palestinian territories. Anyone that says that is "legally illiterate." The Jews are the only people entitled in law to those territories.
Reference:
melaniephillips.substack.com/p/why-israel-is-entitled-in-law-to#:~:text=Israel%2C%20which%20inherited%20the%20sovereign,Israel%20that%20were%20illegally%20detached
You are absolutely correct. However, doesn't resolve the issue.
Really the Jewish kingdom of Judea was conquered by the Romans. I think you will find the Jewish kingdom was long gone by the time of Rome conquering the area under pompey. Alexander be great conquered the Persian empire which covered what would now be Israeli West Bank etc, and then had the Seleucid empire after Alexander the Great. Cannot be bothered to go back further then that but was well before Roman Empire.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 When you have to reference that unbridled Zionist shill , Melanie Philips, for 'facts' you've lost all credibility😂😂😂😂😂. In case it's escaped your notice, the highest court in the world has just the other day said the West Bank does not belong to Israel but is Palestinian. Oh, sorry, I forgot. Israel doesn't recognise International law. My bad🤢
Palestine was coined by deceased ex PLO leader Arafat to support his political agenda against Israel. He was expelled from Egypt and Jordan. He was an Egyptian
@@honeyho9890 The history doesn't matter. Doesn't resolve the issue.
Jesus was born in Bethlehem, the Westbank Judea belongs to Israel.
Even if it wasnt int law its still ours..there u go in a nutshell. Spoken by a brittish person with no ties to the land..farcical.. at the very least..
@@tomgallagher7870As are farcical all these Irish haters of Jews who have no ties to the land and no true knowledge of the situation, and indulge in visceral hatred.
@@maltija1 the difference is im not claiming to own the land.oh dont worry its not just my country most of the world is on the right side.let me guess im anti semetic?nope.one of my friends is jewish.he has the maturity to see both sides.so can i.i believe everyone should have a home.just not at the expense of others.as for my knowledge .i know enough ive watched for years.your having a go at me?i would like to see a two state solution.the brittish guy?he wants every bit of the land?see the difference?..
@@tomgallagher7870 And how many times has a two-state solution been offered to the "Palestinians" and they've always rejected it? Their own foundational religious texts make it a "holy" mission to wipe out Jews. Sahih Muslim 2922. Even a "moderate" "Palestinian" political entity like the "Palestinian Authority" has never published an Arabic charter that didn't call for the destruction of Israel. 70% of the "Palestinians" supported the Oct 7 attacks (The PALESTINIAN Center for Policy and Survey Research). And how are adherents of other faiths doing at the hands of the the adherents of the "religion of peace"? "Christian persecution in the Middle East reaching 'genocide-like' levels" - BBC 3rd May 2019. Both Judaism and Christianity originated in the Middle East and pre-date Islam but both have just about been wiped out. Israel is the only country still with a discernible Jewish population. Don't know how long it's going to be before people wake up and realize the Islamists do not want people of other faiths living amongst them (at least not as equals).
@@lylarose2696 AMEN, to think Palestinian Muslims are in charge of our saviors birthplace. My sisters family went to visit , said Israel beautiful BETHLEHEM under pals is filthy.
My Mexican American Brother in law said “ I wouldn’t buy shit from them” meaning palestinians. Asked why they have soooo many children they can’t afford the men said “Allah will provide” ! No all European and American taxes pay for feeding their offspring. They are perpetual and generational welfare recipients!
He is more knowledgeable than the best legal minds .
The full bench of the court disagrees, you lost the case
@@practice4523A court as biased as yourself.
@@practice4523a court run by a lebanese Jew hater
@@practice4523 The ICJ’s decision is an advisory opinion and has no direct legal consequences on Israel or other UN member states, but it could be another blow to the Jewish state’s international standing and add political pressure over its devastating nine-month-old war against Palestinian terror group Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Israel did not take part in the hearings, instead submitting a written contribution that described the questions the court had been asked as “prejudicial” and “tendentious.”
@@maltija1 the ICJ agrees with the Izrayili supreme court in case you didnt know
God bless Israel and MP. Natanyahu, bravo IDF soliders.
Was the Six Day War started by the Arabs legal? Regardless, the land they (Jordan, Egypt, etc) lost to Israel in a defensive war *_cannot_* be called illegally occupied. And what's more, Jordan and Egypt seized (aka illegally occupied) the West Bank & Gaza respectively, in 1948-50 following the first Arab-Israeli war.
was. but that’s why it’s called double standards: one set for the world, another for Jews.
The latest decision, which was made just last week at the International Court of Justice, is going to change the law, so that we will no longer be able to claim such rights. This is what happens when things are delayed and postponed.
The war was started by Izrayil, read your history well
@unisophia did you say "jews"?
Allways defensive and highly moral with shitrael. The biggest load of BS under the sun. Always screaming antisemitism. You make me sick.
There is no such thing as the West Bank, it's Judea and Samaria, the most central area besides Jerusalem, Zion, to the Jews and it belongs to the Jewish state of Israel forever
Israel has the historical, biblical and political rights.
Never back off from your biblical promised land, Israel. Those Arab palestines never has any section of land in the promised land.
@@YosephKlemensMau bible is a fairy tale book
@@AhmedWaheed-pl3gt -urs is the fairy tale mr. islamonazi
@@AhmedWaheed-pl3gt most of us don’t follow 7th century Mein Kampf
@@AhmedWaheed-pl3gtwhere did Hebrew texts (Torah, Tanakh, Hebrew Bible etc) come from, China?
@@AhmedWaheed-pl3gt like the quran
Is no West Bank, it always was Judea & Samaria, Israel land. NO West Bank.
@@GE7274 keep dreaming
@@GE7274 Land thieves always look back to the past to justify their thivery. There are no excuses to steal someones home, only that made up by the thieves themselfs.
@@practice4523 Keep "practicing" false history. True history: There were no Arabs, let alone Muslims when the Jewish people first came to the land circa 3000 BCE
@@practice4523keep lying
@@sergeantzack1106 dream on xionist
The problem is that the ruling is made on laws that didn't imagine in a million years a people would start a war, lose, get occupied and then refuse for the next 57 years to sign a peace treaty. On that basis, if Germany or Japan after WWII had refused to sign a peace treaty accepting their defeat we would now be illegally occupying them which is bonkers crazy. If the Arabs in the occupied territories don't want to be occupied they have the choice to accept defeat, sign a peace treaty and move on. That they don't means they choose to be occupied.
What you are saying would at least make some sense. Problem is this is not the reality - West Bank was never taken in a war from the State of Palestine, because that one did not proclaim independence until 1988, and it's till this day still not a sovereign state eligible for UN membership. When Israel proclaimed independence in 1948 all of the Mandatory Palestine territory was incorporated to Israel based on the "Uti possidetis juris" rule of international law, therefore West Bank is Israel territory that was occupied by Jordan 1948-1967.
They didnt get "occupied". They were the conquered occupiers.
@@Zbychoslaw666 hey mr 666, Izrayil has not annexed the West Bank, hence it doesnt belong to Izrayil. This case was litigated in court and Izrayil lost, learn to accept defeat
@@practice4523 There is no need to annex West Bank, because it never ceased to be Israel territory - occupation and annexation by Jordan was illegal according to international law, and international community, including the Arab League. The same situation exists in Ukraine, when Russia occupied and annexed Crimea, but it is still considered Ukrainian by the international community.
@@Zbychoslaw666 same applies, the int'l community considers the West Bank as part of plstn
The legal principal of estoppel means that the Jewish National Home, from the River to the Sea, as per the 1922 Palestine Mandate and endorsed by UN charter article 80 is still in force. The ICJ, like the UN, is under Sharia. There is no 'Occupied Palestinian Territory' just arab squatters who need to leave.
Because it's Israeli land hestorcal, biblical, and other evidence.but ICJ trying to take away this land by second hand
@@Vjaffacake-c6t
What part of historical evidence is fairy tales?
@@FBI-ju5nothe fact that Isreal was a state long before Palestinian was
@@sergeantzack1106
That's true, so where's the fairy tale?
Palestine never has been a state, and isn't currently, while Israel has been three times now.
So, all the population currently n throughout history, were/are isr@€li then if it's their land???
@@sergeantzack1106lol for less than 100 years, you aren’t even an original Jew go take a blood test.
Here in the Netherlands we have Anarchists who place stickers everywhere stating "No human being is illegal" claiming that any human has the free right to live anywhere, but this universalism somehow has a single exception, Jews living in Judea and Samaria.
Sounds like a one-state solution with equal rights for all (like it was pre-Balfour)... are you okay with that?
It’s the international court of criminals.
God who created heaven n earth promised this land for His chosen people when God put something in place noone can say otherwise...God of Israel is in control
Let call God and ask, shall we. I guarantee you will never get an answer!
We will ..
Grow up
I can say otherwise - for example I could say that your God is a made up fairy who does not exist and has no authority over non-Jews and that the idea of being God's chosen people is just a narcissistic delusional fantasy.
Not everyone believes in fairytales 😂
Israel has absolutely no need to bind to International Law.
Perche.?
@@NataleFallanca The ICJ and UN are anti semitic commie lovers.
The empires are cover the crimes of the Zionist state. Is already know that.
" Israel has absolutely no need to bind to International Law. "
- Ehr, not exactly.
"States may choose to not abide by international law, and even to breach a treaty but such violations, particularly of peremptory norms, can be met with disapproval by others and in some cases coercive action ranging from diplomatic and economic sanctions to war" - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law
Israel and the USA acted as rogue states and they saved theirselves thanks to the veto by the USA at the security council otherwise you would have seen a way more serious situation.
By forcing the non-recognition of the international laws a nation can be expelled (as a member) from the UN.
It is not requested only because it would be a waste of time due to the veto by the USA but things can go differently if they continue that way.
Israel would not risk to be expelled since it exists thanks to its presence at the UN that used time ago as formal recognition (while still illegally self-declared, on the base of false promises).
Time to study, kiddo, no matter israel/palestine.
@@leonardoarmandoiarrusso1225cope
Judah and Samaria are Israel. Period.
Based on your false logic the US should be given back to the native Americans 🤡😆
@@LeonardoPisano-sn2lpkeep lying
@@sergeantzack1106 it's called LOGIC
And how exactly will these clowns force the Israelis out of Judea and Samaria?
They can't. It's all antisemitic Israeli denying optics. Am Israel Chai. Special gratitude to the Jews living in Judea and Samaria, the aboriginal ancestral heartland.
they can’t, unless they somehow manage to install puppets in our government who will do the dirty job for them.
They simply can’t! Israel military and morally too strong for any clown to force them Oort of their homeland.
Same way the Americans forced the clowns from London out of the USA
The same way the romans did
another point that never came up in this video to why israel has the legal fight of not only the West Bank, but also gaza, and that's the strong principle of uti possidetis juris in international law. its kinda interesting how anti semites seems to allways wanna deny the jews rights that's commonly accepted in the rest of the world
The Jews did have the right to Gaza, but they formally renounced any claim to that land in 2005, same as they did with Area A of the West Bank a decade earlier.
Those places are really the only true “Palestinian land” now, but it was a mistake for Israel to give them up, in hindsight, because all that’s resulted from it is ten times as much terrorism against them.
We need more videos like this, but we need it translated into Arabic, etc.
I speak Arabic and I don’t need this translated. I can tell you this video is full of ziosplaining to try to warp laws and facts. Notice how they added the imaginary word “forcefully” to the law where it doesn’t exist, and how they said that territory can be taken through “defensive” war. Actually the law says territory cannot be taken through “war,” not just “offensive war,” implying neither defensive nor offensive war can result in taking land. And of course it wasn’t a defensive war when israel fired the first bullet, but that’s another story.
they dont care about truth or history.. "try to search on google Zuheir Mohsen quote"
@@someone35354
But if you are a victim, and you keep reminding people what a victim you are, you can bury babies alive in self-defence.
Most of the "Arab World" was taken through conquest. Most recently all the borders of modern middle-eastern nations, which resulted from war with the Ottomans. @someone35354
@@someone35354did you forget the bombings from gaza in the last 10 years
Not only a legal right but a Devine Right established in Scripture !
And historically proven, outside of scriptures
you are totally inventing stuff
@@leonardoarmandoiarrusso1225 one you assert, you prove. This will of course require you to 'disappear' the 15ooo dedd Sea 📜 scrolls
@@leonardoarmandoiarrusso1225 four: you will also need to disappear megiddo, masada, the city of David and of course countless other artefact. Like my Judean coin 2,400 years old ...
@@leonardoarmandoiarrusso1225 I will try two again and see if it stays up. I will paraphrase it: use your izz Raily phone to look up ancient synagogues Golan, similar for Galilee Jordan etc etc.
the British Mandate for Palestine was the original 2-state solution. the Jewish state is Mandatory Palestine (i.e. Israel, gaza and the WB) and the Arab state is Jordan
So by their standards, the Australian government and Australians who are not indigenous to Australia are also in violation of international law and must forfeit the land of Australia?
@@Critical-Of_Thought sounds good to me!
I sure wish the United States government would educate themselves and watch this!
Ah yes to wash the brain some more
@@keevvvd9197US gives cash to Israel, and some of that cash comes back and is used to bribe politicians via lobby groups. Free the US.
So the is showen
I’m really looking forward to watching the documentary tonight Ollie.
Early retirement is fantastic , late nights reading etc. 😂
Hope you enjoy it!
As a Jew, I don't care whether or not Israel has a legal right to Gaza or the West Bank. The reality is that between the PA and Hamas, the Palestinians do not have the ability to effectively govern these lands and there will always be a threat to Israel. With that said, give Gaza back to Egypt and the West Bank back to Jordan. In other words, no two state solution.
The "West Bank" ie Judea and Samaria wasn't Jordan's to begin with. Nor did Gaza belong to Egypt, they were occupied by both through war. Once the Arabs calling themselves Palestinians settled there, neither country wanted them back - they wanted Israel to deal with the problem, or perhaps they wanted to keep having an excuse to blame Israel for things it hadn't done.
egypt doesn't want gaza, and Jordan doesn't want the west bank. That's the conundrum.
I agree that it extends beyond rights to the land; as a nation Israel also has the right to security. That’s the reason they occupied the West Bank and Gaza to begin with.
If my nation, Canada, was crawling with terrorist groups, constantly firing missiles at random civilian targets in the US, and regularly making deadly incursions across the border to massacre and kidnap civilians, I’d say we more than deserved to be occupied and even annexed by the US.
Having an autonomous state comes with certain obligations, and one of them is to not attack or invade other nations other than in self defense.
When a nation does that, and subsequently lose the war they started, they forfeit their own sovereignty rights.
@@KathyPrendergast-cu5cihate to tell you....the same terrorists ARE already in Canada.
How you can "effectively govern" a land when don't even have full authority of a land?
On that day the Lord made a covenant with Abram and said, "To your descendants I give this land, from the Wadi of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates - the land of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites, Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites and Jebusites." - Genesis 15:18-21.
Isreal as far as the most neighbouring countries belong to Isreal.
correct, almost all jews shown on screen attest to this promise God gave to Abraham, very few on screen argue this, shows who believes God n who believes God's word
So when will the tribes of the USA get their lands back?
@@keithapps Noone is killing Americans to leave the land. But all these fools supporting terrorists are not out of hamas killing least.
The Bible is just a story about religion, it dosn't give the descendants of Abraham the right to murder those who now live on that land. The ten commandments teaches you not to murder, steal or covet your neighbours possessions, when will you follow the teachings given.
@@keithappswhen we reach the new heavens n new earth, tis why when peeps say genocide they have no idea, how many tribes were completely destroyed, I believe it was Andrew Jackson who tried to completely decimate, genocide all Indians, but here on this earth we will never get our lands back,
There’s a Palestinian state it’s called Jordan
Claiming land inhabited by other people for thousands of years based on religious stories written down by your supposed ancestors (but more likely the ancestors of the Palestinians who live there) is laughably ridiculous, if it wasn’t for the tragic and cruel treatment of the indigenous Palestinians by Israel settlers.
If Jews have an absolute and exclusive right to inhabit Israel (and just what extent is biblical Israel?) then surely they have no right to inhabit any other part of the world. That was the concern of Lord Montague, the only cabinet member and only Jew in the cabinet, to argue, vehemently, against the making of the Balfour declaration in 1917. His concern was that by creating a Jewish homeland to solve a European problem (anti-semitism), it would take citizenship away from Jews in the many countries they inhabited. This was prescient.
The world map looked very different 2000 years ago. Trying to roll it back on the basis of traditional stories has been nothing but a delusional colonial project that has and continues to cause untold tragedy. Only when all people have equal rights and religion and ethnicity play no part in that can Jews or Arabs have any peace in the region.
I am ashamed at the role both European Christianity (the origin of anti-semitism and Zionism) and British imperialism have had in promoting the Zionist project for mistaken geo-political benefits.
Why are they calling it the West Bank ! It is Judea and Samaria ! No geographical place called the West Bank !!!!
Have you seen the 'west bank' of the jordan river? Its about two meters wide!
West bank refers to the West bank of the Jordan River from the perspective of that piece of land belonging to Jordan, which it does not, if it did, then the Palestinians would have EVEN LESS claim to it.
In truth, the "West bank" is Eastern Israel.
same reason they call them "Palestinians", to perpetuate the lie.
God’s everlasting covenant was for Jewish people to be given all of this land. By all religious and historical doctrines, it is clear the land from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea and through to the Euphrates River, including Gaza, belongs to the Jewish people
God doesn't have any covenant with anyone but those who accept his Son as Lord and Savoir.
If we are going for "precise", it's time we replace "two State solution" with "three State solution". 3/4 of former British Palestine was given to the Arab Palestinians. The land was conveniently renamed Trans-Jordan and later Jordan. The British appointed an Arab/Muslim monarch - who's family is still in power today. There already is a "Palestinian" State. And why is 3/4 not enough?
Because muslims want to turn the whole world muslim. at least that's what they say in Arab mosques. If it was about land, they would've kept bitching at the Jordanians as well.
Notice how the palestinians or at least hamas keep calling israelis yahoods when a good chunk of them are muslims. It's not about land, it's about how the supposedly superior muslims keep losing to lowly yahoods.
Judea Samaria Jerusalem and many other names of places appear in the Torah ! Long before Christianity and Islam ! An Authentic Document !
The Bible says thou shall not steal, shall not kill, thou shall not covet thy neighbours possessions, why don't you follow your own religious rules?
Our Authentic document is the Torah !
Thank you for helping us be more informed so that we can support our side in dialogue. (However I've never doubted Israels rights for a nano - second, of course)
🇬🇧 💙 🇮🇱
I was stunned when I thought you said Roger Waters, ok it's Roger Walters. Good arguments by the way.
It did sound like he said Roger Waters.
Yes. Roger Waters is a real jew hater. Lisbeth
I thought so too!
Solve the problem, annex Judea and Samaria❤
God is NOT a real estate agent. You can’t just claim everything is yours
They won the wars in 1948 and then in 1967.
They own it!
🙂💪🇮🇱❤️
Boom! Thank you. Have to listen later! But I will.
This is not a ruling but a flawed opinion that carries no legal weight. It was deeply flawed in that it ignored many fundamentals of international law. It was also highly biased not least by having an anti-Israel presiding judge. There was a dissenting opinion that more accurately reflected the position but this got little to no coverage. The UN has unfortunately become an anti Israel forum. It is high time for it to look more closely at itself and stop allowing anti Israel nations from using it for their own political ends.
Brilliant work ❤
Literally not even two minutes into the video and he already admits he doesn't respect or even care about international law. God says this is mine (or at least I think God says that) so it's mine.
Cope and seeth
It says in the Torah that the Jews are to welcome the stranger. I dont see that happening when christains and muslims are being spat on punched , and beaten by Orathdox jews, these events have been viewed on video's.
Wow. Great Points👏👏👏
Only if you're a Zionist.
"...the Terrorist organizations build up from our own ranks.
I am not willing to see anybody associated with those misled and criminal people;" Albert Einstein
Israel will always be Israel and will not hand over any grounds belonging to Israel !
It's only been Israel since 48 so how can it "always be"?
@@jesse5457 nonsense
@@BobvanT so when was it established. Don't give me BS about judea, nobody cares
@@jesse5457 nonsense
@@BobvanT that's all you got? 😂
This is only referring to an area of land, but there are people living on that land and have been living on that land as the majority for at least 1000 years. Where do they go? If Israel incorporates the land, do these people who call themselves as Palestinian become full citizens of the state? If not what would be their status be?
TRUTH!!!
You make the same points the Germans made in the 30s and 40s ..
Whoever wins owns it all.
unfortunately that's the law of bullies. Int'l law disagrees with you
@@practice4523So, you do agree the Turks should give the land back to thr Byzantines, Armenians and Assyrians?
Sounds like the law of the jungle to me. I think humanity has progressed since then😂😂
@@stephendoherty981law of the jungle muslim follow.
@@stephendoherty981 Did we really progress? Ukraine, Congo, Syria, Yemen, Israel, Iran, Gaza, Sudan, Central African Republicl Nigeria all have some sort of civil wars going on. Ans how many countries did the West invade the last 20 years? Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya.... Humans hardly ever learn.
What it comes down to, in the long term, is who has the strength to hold the lands against all comers. So Israel had better stay very strong and able to defend its possession. The world agrees on only one thing, the hatred of Jews. Historically, over and over, many peoples have taken the same tired land. The Cannanites, the Jews, Egyptians, Assyrians, Greeks, Romans, various European Crusaders, the Turks, the English and now, the Jews, once again. I hate that might means right, in our world, but it’s a truism along with the universal hatred towards Jews.
❤️🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱❤️🙏🙏🙏❤️💪💪💪
🇮🇱♥️🇮🇱♥️🇮🇱♥️🇮🇱🙏👍👍👍
"Advocated absurdly"........ that's right, boo,
just like all cheap ambulance chasers do.
When the Zionists ended the exile and did not wait for the Messiah to call them back, they broke the oath with God.
no where in the bible does it say that we cannot have a country and that we have to wait for the Messiah. You are welcome to quote the verse, i'll wait.
@@amaterasu22able ask a non-Zionist rabbi and he will fully explain it to you. That is why the Israelites did not return to the holy land as a group for 2000 years.
@@dfwtransport2420 No. You made a claim, back it up or retract it, don't send me to "do my own research".
Provide proof to your claim or admit that you are just repeating senseless propaganda made by anti-semites.
@@dfwtransport2420 most rabbis are zionists. Except the tiny minority of ultra radical cult Neturei Karta, banned from all rabbinic circles and that nobody takes seriously but other radicals who use them in their own radical agendas. And Israelis are zionists (even Arab, Druze Israeli citizens support zionism) and 90% of Jews worldwide support zionism and so do many non-Jews. I’m from First Nations Canada and support zionism and ISRAEL 100%
@@dfwtransport2420always has been a longstanding Jewish presence in JUDEA AND SAMARIA, cradle of JEWISH civilisation (renamed by the greco-roman ‘Palestina’ by Romans) and constant return throughout history despite foreign invaders. YERUSHALAYIM, Holiest city of the Jewish people was 80% Jewish in 1864 (Ottoman Turk occupation census) before massive @ROB (feudal clans, nomads etc from all over) came flooding in by the hundreds of thousands after Jews bought land from absentee landlords and developed it and also came flooding in after the fall of Ottoman Turk occupation during the British Mandate….50,000+ @rob migrants came (many illegals) even in the 1930s+ according to the 1937 Peel Commission Report.
It really is wild reading people who think settler colonials have the right to a land because of religious beliefs based on a text that has been demonstrated over and over, through archeology, to have almost zero historical truth in it.
Fact is that in the land of Canaan/Judea/Palestine, many religious beliefs have been followed as times and culture changes. This was the polytheism that was practiced up until 3rd or 4th century BCE, 2nd Temple Judaism forced upon the locals by elites returning from Persia (and many who remained there to form the Jewish communities that were a huge part of the rich tapestry of Iraq and Iran. This also included the many who converted to Christianity and then those Jewish Christians living in Arabia who then formed Islam.
What is also a fact, is that genetic studies show that the modern Palestinian population is the same population that has lived there for at least 4,000 years. Whereas the modern Jewish populations are partly descended from that old population, but also a mix of the genetics from the areas they have settled. This is true for Ashkenazi Jews, Arabic Jews and Sephardic Jews.
Just because your family continued to follow a religion that was one of the most common at a certain period, or you converted or married into that religion, does not give you rights to that land. It is not saying you could not migrate there, it is saying you can not move there on mass and form a nation on the ashes of the towns you have ethnically cleansed.
Even if Palestine is able to finally form a nation in a two-state settlement, it won't be the end of it. This will continue until all refugees and their descendants are granted right of return and their homes are returned to them.
They even colonized IRAN
Really? Abraham was born in modern day Iran. How do you colonize a land where you were born?
@@ex-conindustriesllc.9484 I thought Ur was modern day Iraq?
@TheBlackThorneKnight With new archeological evidence it's a toss up between Iraq and Iran. Just being sarcastic. Jews have always been present throughout the entire region
Has the ICJ declared the Russian occupation (and settlement) if the Crimea illegal? Has the ICC declared the Turkic occupation and settlement of Constantinople(1456) and the entire Anatolia peninsula illegal and that it should be returned to the indigenous ethnic Greeks with Turks returning to Central Asia? Should Koernigsberg be returned to ethnic Germans? etc. etc.
Legal experts ?????😂
Our bible has archeology to back us up!!! No change.Therefore,international law is just an addition
Yes, there were many legal experts in that movie
👍
❤
Long live Israel
Crimea has always been considered part of the Ukraine and over time has been conquered by the Mongols, Ottomans and Russians. In 1991 when Ukraine gained independence the majority of the population was not Ukrainain, yet under international law it became part of the Ukraine. In 2014 Russia occupied and annexed Crimea. Despite its demographics, history of being part of the Russian/USSR empire, and a population that prefers to be part of Russia, Crimea by international law is Ukraine. Should the Ukraine re-take this land and over time Ukrainians move to Crimea they would simply be moving from one part of the country to another. There cannot be one set of law for Israel and another for other countries.
You are conflating something that is nothing related to Israel's legal right to the land ... forget the fact that Judea and Samaria is the aboriginal lands of only one people .... the JEWS. But even if Jews never ever lived in the land (which is an absurd concept), under INTERNATIONAL LAW, the and belongs to Israel.
@@Lagolop No, the ICJ said the west bank belongs to the Plstnns
@@practice4523 LOL, the ICJ has ZERO legal jurisdiction. Where do they plan to draw it's borders; southern France or Upsala in Sweden perhaps ...
@@Lagolop You forget that Izrayil is a signatory of the ICJ. Ignoring the law does not mean you're above it
@@practice4523 This is bullshit a nd everyone knows it. The leftists like you are desperate but I have to tell you that Israel is strong, Israel is in the right, Israel will never give up, Israel is forever. What do you think the "ramifications " are? There are no ramifications ...LOL.
I’m sooooo incredibly shocked that the EU is aiding the “Palestinians” in breaking the Oslo Accords. I can’t believe they would do this!!! 🙄
The ICJ disagrees with your remedial and dishonest accounting.
Icj are irrelevant! We have the bible,archeology,and genes as proof
You mean a court whose head judge has frequently come out against Israel in the past and that said-judge's own home country (Lebanon) supports a militia (Hezbollah) that seeks Israel's destruction. You mean that totally "unbiased" and "impartial" court?
Thank-you for this one. Judea and Samaria always seem so complex.
Israel is only entitled to the boundaries prior to the 1967 conflict, which she accepted from the United Nations during the partitioning of Palestine.
I imagine ICJ took your arguments into account. The prosecution was more persuasive.
The ICJ is impotent in actual fact and besides, they are an izlam pandering organization. What is the outcome .... ZERO. Antisemitic Israel denying tw@ts can go hike on their own bile :) Am Israel Chai.
Yishai Fleisher compared 🇮🇱☪️ Israel Vs Arab to 🇹🇼🇨🇳Taiwan Vs China. Now I a dual 🇵🇭🇭🇰 citizen compare 🇮🇱🇵🇸🇪🇬🇯🇴 Israel Vs Palestine, Egypt, Jordan to 🇨🇳🇭🇰🇲🇴🇵🇹🇬🇧 China Vs Hong Kong, Macau, Portugal & the UK.
Why doesn't Israel just 'annex' Gaza & West Bank and give Israeli 'citizenship' to all the people, BUT you DON'T give Israeli 'residence'?
Cf
I have 'Chinese' 🇨🇳 citizenship but only HK 🇭🇰 residence. I can't ordinarily study, work or live in mainland China or Macau. And most importantly, HK & Macau have NO MILITARY. Lol.
This way Israel proper is 'mainland Israel' and then Gaza & West Bank will be 'special administrative regions'. Get a governor like Chris Patten. Maybe Mosab Yousef, Luai Ahmed, Yoseph Haddad, Imam Abdullah Antepli or the guy who said 'We must take down the heads of Hamas. Don't leave this place.'
This matter was litigated in court and Izrayil lost.
What “court”?😂
@@KathyPrendergast-cu5ci you don't know? They didnt teach you at your kibbitz school
@@practice4523 Why do you assume I’m Israeli?
@@KathyPrendergast-cu5ci because only an Izrayili would ask "What court?" Since they are Hasbarad from a young age to believe that the only courts that matter are in Izrayil and all the gentile courts are out to get them
@@KathyPrendergast-cu5ci you think like one... ignorant, arrogant and self absorbed
@Base612 VP Julia Sebutinde reminded the court about law ‘uti possidetis juris’ which includes JUDEA AND SAMARIA ,cradle of Jewish civilisation as part of Israel. The rabbid anti-Israel Lebanese judge didn’t like that lol
Useless clip. The historical (indigenous) right to land is tragically wrong - it leads to wars and it's always disputable. Try to find something smarter!
Well its the Jews land so doesnt matter. 🤷♂️
As long as the difference between the "Palestinians" and a Pikachu is 32 years... No1 cares.
There's more to this. The Jews have not just randomly migrated there. Before 1948, they received the Balfour Declaration that promised them sovereignty. They bought lands and only then won more territory through wars that they did not start but were subject to.
@@misuroz2093 ... its the Jews land. you guys prove it something else, the f*ck... they proved it 3500 times plus no f*cking duh... lets say screw all of that... Did Islam win any of the wars in the past 100 years? You want it? stop lying and try to take it like a f*cking man.. oh wait they did and lost... OVEr and OVer... they lost and the dont get another Pakistan. Over the next few years they BETTER learn it.
Jews are from Judea and have lived there continuously since Moses led them dem slavery in Egypt
I’m an Israeli. If we’re ever going to have any stability we need to leave Judaea and Samaria alone. The settlers here are creating problems for all of us. I don’t give a shit about what is legal and what isn’t. This has been Arab land for generations . Israel needs to respect that as the Arabs need to respect the land where most Israelis live. Two peoples live here. We need to respect each other.
Sounds great but let’s not forget it’s a brainwashing those Arabs have gone through about us Jews. From children to adults. This means if you leave them alone there is more then enough chance we will face the same tragedies all over again. Israel must govern Judah and Samaria in my view.
Is somebody expelling the Arabs from the land? No. If I was this racist towards Arabs in the UK will they also have to leave according to you?
They’re not expelling them. They’re just taking farmland and whatever else suits them. The settlers are just as fundamental as any other religion. And what has that got to do with Islam in England.
@@raygrange7312 You're not from Israel or you'd know better.
@@raygrange7312 You seem to think areas should only be one religion and Jewish people shouldn't be in muslim land but you don't have a problem with Muslims on Christian land? Do you know what hypocrisy is? Let's make comparisons to pakistan?
Ah yes, who do you think know more about international law? someone who dedicate their entire life to study about law and have no reason to bias in favour of one side, or someone who literally says he doesn't actually care about the international law in his opening.
Thats the problem with Israel's b/s, there is finite amount that the world will believe
It belongs to us cuz GOD said so
@@danielsgames8810 Ok noted thanks for clearing that up. Just out of curiosity, is that the same God 90% odd of you dont believe in 🤣
@@FelixLaManna First off, we believe in god and do what he telling us to do and second, unlike you christians we didn't created a "New" set of commandments
@@FelixLaManna the west does have a limit and in the near future we may actually see it
@@mysteriousman8769 Gonna "Get the Edomites" are we Shlomo? 🤣
Adonai Elohim bless you Ollie thank you. ❤
Ignorance of the law excuses no one! Not
even the Palestinians
& Pro-Palestinians that
are all ignorant of the
law are excused!
If the same law applies world wide can the West claim the current Islamic invasion is also illegal?
International Court of Jokers
How pretentious are you to think you know better than the ICJ. Go read any history and law books.
Ijc are cursed to the max
In accordance with the laws of war with Israel's victory in 1967 over the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip legally belong to Israel, like Turkey in Constantinople and China in Tibet, they invaded and victory
While I believe many people are aware to the rights of Jews to judea and sumeria, we have to be smart about it.
If the icj, un, etc demands those areas returned, its not an entirely bad thing, Israel can return it to jordan, take out our security measures along the jordan valley and disconnect the areas from our infrastructure. Thus making the palestinians s jordanian problem.
Now jordan got a terrorism problem, the saudis have a terrorism problem, but israel have disconnected from it and only need to hermetically seal 1 border instead of many.
Any aggression from the palestinians would become aggression from jordan, which is a sovereign state and israel can act accordingly.
The icj and their mates cannot complain much because we have turned the palestinian problem into an issue for the arab states instead of ours.
How long before they'll come and ask israels help? Or collapse and allows other forves to take over?
Interesting
I get where you're coming from, but there are some major issues with that plan.
First, Jordan has already given up claims to the West Bank and isn't interested in taking on more people. If Israel stops securing the Jordan Valley, it could seriously strain relations with Jordan.
Without Israel's security measures in the Jordan Valley, the terrorism problem could get worse, not better. Jordan might try to close the border, but that's not guaranteed. Plus, terrorists could use the high ground to launch more serious attacks, beyond just stabbings and bombings. The West Bank's higher ground gives a strategic advantage. If we pull out, weapons and fighters from Syria and Jordan could flood in, threatening our people, land, and water. If we leave the West Bank, does that mean we should also leave the Golan Heights? That would hand strategic high ground to Syria, which is super risky.
Leaving settlements isn’t just about security; it’s also about our right to be there. Abandoning them could undermine the historical connection of Jews to these lands and disrupt agreements like the Oslo Accords, leading to more instability and legal challenges.
Sealing the borders and cutting off services would likely cause a humanitarian crisis. The international community would condemn Israel for this, leading to diplomatic isolation and possible sanctions. While it might shift the problem, it could actually make things way more dangerous for Israel without solving the core issues.
In short, while your idea tries to shift the burden, it could create a much more dangerous security environment for Israel, with less control and more threats on the ground.
@@happinin07 interesting, thanks for explaining
The court did not rule.
The court only gave an expert opinion.
Enjoy the impunity for now but tides are shifting. The older crowd only view legacy media which lies and hides the truth. The youth accesses alternative media and sees the whole picture.
That is very enlightening and reasurring......
@McCraeMoto1 there never was an ethnic group called Palestinians ever recorded in history. ‘Palestina’ is the old greco-roman renaming of JUDEA AND SAMARIA, cradle of Jewish civilisation, by Roman invaders. Romans referred to the Phillistine seafaring invaders from Agean Islands (GREEK) beaten by Egyptians and that occupied a small area near the sea (Phillisia) and were worst enemies of Israelites. Phillistines were wiped out thousands of years ago! In Hebrew, ‘Plishtim’ means ‘invaders’ ‘unholy’ ‘uncultured’
2:30 non binding resolution and legal standing are two different things. A resolution can be non binding and still be a part of the corpus that we call “international law”.
I’ll add that general assembly resolution are binding they are just not enforceable. Get your facts straight