@@GodVanisher It is still really cool to show someone it is functioning while it is functioning and tell them you started it a couple of years before. Some people will believe anything. The first wheel you make will likely only run about a day and a half until you find what is the best shifting weight to use and the best balance without weight. It took some tinkering to make it the 5 to 7 days. I doubt anybody can make these dumb things go any longer. I noticed the small ones work a lot shorter time than the bigger ones. I used shifting liquid to get the best result.
Infinite energy = duplicating energy so plug in battery to a motor and motor will spin a wheel and wheel can make energy to power the battery that is powering a motor, i lost some brain cells when writing this
Does it really need debunking at all? It is rather self debunking when it is said to be perpetual motion. It is rather like saying the planet is flat. Does that really need debunking at all? It is rather self debunking. BGhosts, astro projection, honest politicians, and a bunch of other babble are self debunking.
Anyone who says they designed a Perpetual Motion Machine and asks for money is a Scammer because PPM are impossible due to the law of conservation. Every form of energy is continuously deteriorating into several other smaller forms of energy as it interacts. These machines will Never work without some form of external power input. Just like your device that needs to be charged before use. Or a TV or appliance that needs to be plugged in to work. Hell even a Bicycle requires a rider to put in the energy to make it work. Your pencil isn't gonna do your homework for you. Things that don't work without a battery or a motor? How well will your car/truck run without those? Power drill? Insert device name here!?
Perpetual motion is impossible in closed system just like overunity is impossible in closed electrical system. The system must be open and use external source of energy, by tapping into either manufactured or natural source of energy.
I agree. There are three main "free energy" devices that actually work: Wind turbines, Solar panels, and Water wheels/turbines. They work by converting kinetic energy, or transducing radiant energy. Simply converting available energy into something usable.
@@vincentrobinette1507 Four actually. Atmospheric electricity works as well. ua-cam.com/video/ENeDkGce5-4/v-deo.html Birkeland currents from space are the source of atmospheric electricity. ua-cam.com/play/PLwOAYhBuU3UeKWHRrCw4i-KviQnAhQhBM.html
(1) A counterweight can cause upward motion in something lighter which is supported. T (2) Something lighter can apply leverage when not supported. T (3) Support can be shallowly upward-directed because the resistance is about the same as 50% mass. T
The lever effect from the opposite sides can foul you thinking that it can have a positive momentum gain, but what needs to be observed is that, the TIME that these levers are exercising positive and negative forces on each side. So the net gain is null, minus the frictions of the mechanisme
Cold and warm water actually could work, you can extract existing energy by the differential in temperature between them, making such a device an engine, not a perpetual motion machine. Stirling engines work based on this principle of heat flowing from a 'warm' side to a 'cold' side.
1 only if there is a leakage of flux will a magnet decay, 2 anything that has motion need to have a source of energy present to exist this is called rest mass and momentum with respect to the center origin point of the universe so technically everything is classified as a PMM
@@seemlyme I think that I see what you'ee suggesting - the water ending up at a higher altitude and thus having more potential energy, right? I think that, at the time when the balloon is almost empty, there will not be enough pressure left in it to squirt the last of the water out. And before that, as the pressure is still dropping in the balloon, the water would squirt out at lower and lower speeds as the pressure drops, not reaching the same height as it used to when the balloon was full. So, you couldn't catch it at the same height. If you successfully move some of the water up by some amount, which I believe you could do using this design, you would have to move some of the water down, too. So the overall gravitational potential energy won't go up. Besides this, there is friction involved in fluid dynamics, the amount I'm not sure of but it is there. So, the friction will inevitably convert some of your initial potential energy into heat energy, which is basically a loss because of how hard it is to recapture 100% of the lost heat energy.
Carter Tangeman Free Energy Device apparatus comprising, A positive buoyant stable box tin body having at the base (inside) an Extendable/Retractable chamber with locking mechanism to open and close chamber for incoming water through a hole which is pushing the top part of the chamber by buoyant force of liquid/water to store elastic/ gravitational potential energy then use the energy to pressurise the water in the chamber in enclosed environment then push the chamber water above the surrounding water level through a hole opening on the top of the chamber and above the chamber extendable limit to produce potential free energy in the form of liquid/water to end up with surrounding water to repeat the cycle of water.
@@seemlyme tbh, you can't create energy, only manipulate it. And although you can certainly extract existing energy "for free" it isn't something that didn't exist before. Anytime you get energy out of a system, that same amount of energy was taken from elsewhere (eg: an external source of energy like a battery or a burning candle releasing heat) or else it was transformed from another type of energy already present. For example, cars getting kinetic energy from the motion of pistons, driven by an ongoing reaction which takes gasoline (with a high energy density) and combines it with oxygen and heat, turning it into water vapour, carbon dioxide and some carbon monoxide (each of which has a low energy density compared to gasoline, and can't be combusted in the same way). The energy releases in this reaction is in the form of heat, and the gasses produced are therefore at high pressure (another form of potential energy), which is what pushes the piston, giving most of that energy to the drivetrain of the vehicle, which turns it into rotational motion to trun the wheels, which turn it back into linear motion as the car moves forward. Another example is the electromagnet. Since a static (unchanging) magnetic field doesn't consume energy, all of the energy put into an electromagnet after the first few seconds turns into heat. The way physics works, the byproduct of this transaction is a magnetic field. Even an electric motor, which uses energy only to power these electromagnets, can't be 100% efficient, because a lot of the energy you put into it comes out as heat, not to mention friction, which is always at play and does the same thing. My point is simply that all machines and all interactions transform energy in some way, but none of them use it up. In the same way, no generator or solar panel or turbine or chemical reaction actually produces energy; they only transform it. At the core of these machines and of any real interaction is the fact that energy can neither be created nor destroyed. This is, in fact, at the heart of science and our understanding of physics. We wouldn't have mmodern science as it is today without this understanding. I don't intend to humiliate you or anyone else, but I do want you to understand for your own benefit that this is how things work. What do you think?
Here's how to make a perpetual motion machine. It has a lot of advanced physics behind it that most people won't understand due to the complex nature of how the machine works. Here are the steps to the construction of the machine. Step one, grab your portal gun, step 2 shoot a portal on the floor, step 3 shoot the other portal directly above the portal on the floor. Step 4, jump in. Congratulations you have just completed you perpetual motion machine. All you need to do now is to find out how to turn air resistance into electricity.
To paraphrase a point XKCD made, just ask yourself this question: If even *one* of these things worked (i.e a device that produces infinite, free energy) why hasn’t somebody made a commercial version and become a multi-godzillionaire?
You might want the weights at the end of the wood planks to move closer to the wheel as the planks begin to fold bringing them closer to the wheel as they are being raised and then move to the most outer position when the plank flips over giving some momentum in the process.... The weights will need to be able to slide back and forth tied to possibly some fishing wire that is attached to the weight and the rim with a cam at the base of the plank which will cause the position of the planks to pull on the fishing wire to position the weight.... That way, all the weights going up should be closer to the rim and the downward going weights being extended to their maximum.... Not sure if this works but I think it would ad a difference in the weight going down to the weight going up....
Great video. I think if the gravity pull side continually had more leverage the lifting side would be kept in motion. Imagine the spokes riding an oval cam in the center. The pull side always longer- lift side always shorter and continually changing lengths as it rotates.
@@davidhamilton8984 nobody really knows. Some think there is a divide between energy and negative energy such that the net energy in the universe is zero. Some think time goes forever in both directions and energy is just a constant that exists. Some point to Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle and say we are just part of a wave function in a superposition. Others say God. Really not yet enough evidence one way or another
That is cool.... but I suppose the best thing that will be very close to an actual perpetual motion machine is a drinking bird in cooperated with a piezoelectric crystal (For contact) or even a magnet motor for electrical generation.... The water part of the drinking bird may be connected to a passive air condenser which regenerates the evaporated water.... As far as there is water, the drinking bird can go on forever
yep, as long as they have water they don't stop, i have one myself and i tried to hook a water condenser to it, sadly even if the bird lasts days without adding more water, the condenser is too slow, and even if it was fast enough you still need to change it condensing chemicals once every 2 months or so
so i think using water from the rain will be the best way of passive generation, but still, if we are going to use water from the rain then it's better just to put a turbine in the water collection pipe
No, not really, there is always water vapour around, there are man made water condensers that are being utilized I countries that do not have access to clean water, they condense water fro the air no mater were they are so far there is water vapour in the air to condenser.... And the only thing a dipping bird needs to work is just a part of its head region damp... so, this tech can be indoors... No need for rain
i wonder if using external permanent fixed magnets to force a metal weight to fully retracted or just become weightless on the up stroke would help or a wheel surrounded by electro magnets that are powered by the wheel and activated by the wheel as it turns to alway pull an iron weight forward then turn off as the weight approaches activating the next magnet in line?
Instead of putting all the weight on the outside of the wheel, try putting the weights going from the outside-in like a spiral with the most weight on the outside and the least inside on the center of the spook. Just a thought to play with
:or even change the direction of flow of everything... from eternal expansion back to singularity... wich will cause the certain end of the mythemathical universe :o
you can, actually draw energy from gravity, the moon has been doing it since its formation, making it go farther away and slowing the earth rotation. but there is so much energy that we will probably never notice any diference.
Years ago I had the idea of two interlocking wheels, like a set of cogs - both with magnets on the ends of the cog tooth. one with north facing, the other with south facing. as they came into contact with each other at the cog intersection point, one pole would repel (or attract, depending on which way you set it up) the other opposite pole. The magnets would not ever actually physically touch, but they would have a brief magnetic field interaction at the intersection point, which the force of repelling (or attracting) would cause the wheels to spin either away, from each other, or toward each other, but it would generate motion: and, as the speed of the wheels (cogs with magnets on the ends) picked up speed, the interactions between the intersection point would increase to a point where the electromagnetic field would cap out at a pretty high speed, never actually coming into contact with each other. Pully's could be attached to the uni-polar magnetic cog wheels and stored in a battery- well at least hypothetically anyway. I had a dream about this alien magnetic generator unit years ago but never actually tried to build it. - I dunno, I''m not a physicist or a mathematician, but could it work?? I have always wondered
Mike Remington no it can't work, the fields on permanent magnets will interfere in the leading edge as much as it "pushes" on the trailing edge. You could always use an electromagnet and rapidly switch it, but all you've done is make an electric motor at that point.
a few things you failed to take note of: 1. the weight of the bicycle wheel (should be as little as possible, use cardboard/styrofoam for your experiment?), 2. the weight at end of the arms (should be as heavy as possible, without breaking), 3. you ARE harnessing the gravity, which is constant, to make motion, so the 'idiots' out there screaming "perpetual is not possible", they should ask instead how to make for example this wheel 'imbalance' enough to have motion. 4. this is NOT exactly free energy as everyone failed to take into consideration that gravity is always there, same for the permanent magnet 'thing', where the magnetic field is always there until it fails. the problem lies with the configuration, other than the burden of the materials to make those devices. it is not that hard to make any of these things, the problem is how do you survive after you make a working model, and if you're significant enough for the to not do anything to you, after seeing you as a threat to their constant income. cheers!
Try using a wheel with two alternating field by using the heavier weight redistribution from the center to move lighter weights to the outer edges of a wheel. It’s not a simple gravity problem but a mechanical actions caused by kinetic energy. A carefully choreographed accident.
Opposing magnetic fields on ferrite rods might work better...it must be anti-gravity and momentum to work. I am sure inductors and capacitors must be used in a oscillating feed back circuit. It must be designed to be like something Nikola Tesla figured out...It was always about amplifying and then feedback with him. You can use negative as much as positive in a signal to make energy production work for you. He learned to use the discharge as much as the charge of the capacitor work for him. He learned how to use the kickback to induce amplification. He did understand AC after all to produce free power. It's his 3-6-9. Go there.
I would have hoped that an engineer would also understand that by adding weights on the ends it would also be adding weight on the other side of the device.... the moment would change yes but this would do nothing to change the nature of the device.
Interesting video, nicely engineered wheel, although the gravity wheel will not work in its present form your idea of magnets to give it a push are interesting, maybe the best thing to come from over unity motors is the discussion and other information found out while experimenting, regards Doc Cox
@@uncopino you should tell that to PMMG4HYBRID .. who is capable of running a motor which feeds itself and generates enough charge to charge things externally. The biggest challenge is that people always seem to think that these machines are something to be done with only one form of energy transference, like gravity to rotation, but when you start incorporating multiple forms of energy transference, then it is possible to get more out than what you put in. The thing is just working out the methods of energy transference which work well with with each other. E=0.5VSquared :D the equation for a bipolar coil, works on the basis of 3 motions of energy transference. It's not perpetual motion, but it is pretty cool at amplifying the energy which is supplied, I guess with an interesting enough setup, you may be able to make it feed itself and then absorb the inducted energy at a small enough rate that it's capable of replenishing itself without being effected by the loss itself. But that's just a spitball hypothesis .. would need to make a few things before finding out if the hypothesis is plausible.
Klay you simply don’t get what energy is. you can never get out more than you put in, doesn’t matter how many types of energy transfer are involved. even the idea of trying is just plain stupid. try study some physics instead of throwing equations at me without even knowing what they are. that’s the kinetic energy formula! what bipolar coil are you blabbing about? you guys need to stop trusting pseudo-scientists on youtube ffs
@@uncopino Yep, you can never trust an equation from Nikola Tesla patents.google.com/patent/US512340 and check out this and tell me how it works ua-cam.com/video/UuiFoq9Y7do/v-deo.html but it's okay .. I just stupid ... SMH
in fact the weight underneath forms a pendulum and nullifies the gravity of those who are just above, you have to put a mechanism that equals the gravity of those from above so that it has the same weight ...
What about a strong magnet at the very bottom left of the wheel, with magnets on them instead of weights, with the magent and magnet weights placed in such a way that the magnet will attracted them then repulse them once the magnet reaches the pisition of thw wheel where it starts attracting another magnet on the wheel, as if not the magnet will work against the motion also, that seems like it would get max use out of the magnet, just a thought
We have an entire study on the physics of flying objects, it's called aerodynamics. Flight has been attainable for certain animals since before the dinosaurs, there has never been an animal or system created by natural or artificial means that produces more energy in a closed system than what said closed system started with.
The only way for this offset to work is to have and axis for the wheel be momentum driven to shift left to right or right to left and back and forth on the spin.
The issue is that springs exhibit a non- even force so that the arm is not itself balanced. If the arms maintained balance with gravity over at least 1/4th the wheel, then the idea would work. The core issue is that in this config, it takes energy to raise the arms, in order to cause the imbalance. You need to cancel the force on the arms so that raising or lowering costs no energy (just friction at the bearing). But you can't do that with those springs, their foce curves are all wrong.
Виталий Абашкин Иностранцы в этом же ютубе видят, что russia это страна жуликов, воров и бандитов. Вот несколько роликов для примера, и подобных роликов - очень много. Герои этих роликов находятся близко к вершине российского общества. Они лицо страны. ua-cam.com/video/fe4rPbhqyl8/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/yQ4_-PeHAcI/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/ecSFOC0ulBA/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/QcSmT5WD2qs/v-deo.html
I think you was on the right track when you brought in the springs... Maybe you could adjust the Springs tension to fold the weighted arms outwards at just the right time to keep the wheel in motion... Basicly the springs will do all the work...
yester years cassettes player had that mechanical mechanism , the cassette used to spring out when eject button was press, similar mechanism might make it work, anything that pushes those arms off banlance ahead of its time, another idea would be a fixed notch placed such that rotations help it press the arm forward , like a Seesaw
No matter what you do, as long as there is some kind of friction/resistance, its given initial energy will be wasted and it will stop. You have to create in the space of the wheel forces that cancel the gravitational field and a non symmetric field of forces that would provide energy to the wheel, but in that case you have to provide energy for the existence of the asymmetric field. Simply, you can not create energy from nothing, but an initial given kinetic energy could be maintained only in the case you eliminated any possibility of transformation to another form of energy.
There is a method to do this..you can create a modal with weight attached to end of each rod..then move it outwards when it is about to start falling down.with this you can change the centre of mass move little bit outwards.. I think this method might be worked.. if you are interested please try...
Need to use small Magnets for the Weights , and , a Linear repullsor array needs to placed on the descending side at a point just beyond where the Arms have dropped , against Solid Stops . This where you may pick up some Push in the System . On that brief Downstroke . Perhaps Shorter Arms and more numerous .
Gravity is a conservative force. Look up what that means on Wikipedia. Consider this... An objects gravitational potential energy depends on its height. So if it falls from H1 to H2 the energy released is proportional to H1 - H2. The same applies to the energy required to lift something. It only depends on the change in height. As consequence of this this if an object ever returns to the same place the net work done by gravity will be zero. If a mountain climber returns to his hotel after climbing a mountain the work he does against gravity on the way up is equal to the work gravity does on him on the way down. Net result zero. The important thing to understand is that only the change in height matters (eg H1- H2) the path taken between those two heights does not matter. Likewise it does not matter which route the climber takes, if he returns to his hotel the net work done against gravity is zero. It might not feel like that to him but thats because humans are inefficient machines (They dont even have regenerative braking). If the path taken doesnt matter this means that ANY gravity powered machine that returns to the same position (eg one that rotates) cannot do work.
So you admit that perpetual motion machines "PMM" are indeed impossible but still fun quirky mechanisms to create or admire even though there is no net gain of usable energy. Water is the best gravity fed energy storage medium. No system can break the law of conservation. Weather its heat transfer, friction, gravity or EMF's. The more parts you add the more energy is required to make it work. Even a ball suspended with magnets in a vacuum chamber would eventually stop due to the force of gravity. Even if you put that same chamber with its spinning ball into geosynchronous orbit. It would slow the loss of energy quite a bit by reducing friction and the effect of gravity but you can only minimize the effect to a limit. All things interact with all other things in the universe like a rainbow ripple of every conceivable wavelength if energy, color & matter.
You could do this using only the pushing force of magnets. If your machine could feel the pull of the magnet it would again even itself out. Makes me wonder would the magnet be the energy source the hidden battery?? Even it worked its far from Perpetual motion.
2.00 if you put another horisontal line you see water on the left bottle far from center that water in the right bottle ... if that need to balance and that must rotate wheel untill they come to stabe position. please try to make with bottles ...
I believe the only way to get this to work is if you could somehow alter gravity to be greater than 1g on one side and 1g or less on the other. Magnets wear out over time. Then again, the device altering gravity would probably wear out as well but we don't know what it would be so it's also possible that it doesn't wear out.
How about using a relaxed spring on the weight instead of the paint stick. Then replace the paint stick with a metal track for the weight to spring in and out from?
The automotive crankshaft is of the same principle. Your hand starting this is the same like an electric starter of an automobile. The water inside the bottles is creating continuous momentum like how gasoline blows in cylinders
The very car engine itself is very close to perpetual motion. Alternator and a starter, along with a battery, make a closed cycle system. A motor just won't spin if the alternator and battery are connected to it. The battery would just keep draining and won't even be kept at steady level at all given that it is charged by the alternator. But it is not considered as a perpetual motion machine because it is intended to burn gasoline, which is an external energy source.
The common missunderstanding of Gravity Wheel ist, that when the arm or the Walther ist flowing Backwards in the bottom of the wheel there ist a counter force to the wheel wich will Balance the while system Out, therefore no plus in Energy, it's a simple missunderstanding.
I have looked at all your comments which is an honest reply but this thing might work with quite a bit of modification looked at water bottles analysis and see why it does not work because the weight of the liquid which is the same problem with you fix weight balances out going to give it a try
1:53 hmm do this remind me of something
wow a year later we end up watching the same video an hour apart and i was just about to comment this.
@@CrazyZack_TX wow me too
perpetual motion. Spinning all the way to poland...
@@animovie1 hahah
@@animovie1 :D
Pretty good video but needs more explosions and whoosh noises in the intro
Agreed
I'm so baked and that was the funnist thing I've ever seen haha
Good idea!
Whoosh
Would millions of people have watched if the title was "gravity wheel that doesn't work "
It sort of works. It will run 5 to 7 days if you balance it perfectly before adding th shifting weights. But do not expect it to go on forever.
I knew that it doesn't work before watching this, but I still clicked.
@@GodVanisher It is still really cool to show someone it is functioning while it is functioning and tell them you started it a couple of years before. Some people will believe anything. The first wheel you make will likely only run about a day and a half until you find what is the best shifting weight to use and the best balance without weight. It took some tinkering to make it the 5 to 7 days. I doubt anybody can make these dumb things go any longer. I noticed the small ones work a lot shorter time than the bigger ones. I used shifting liquid to get the best result.
It needs to be self reinforcing by building a charge of some kind that can rekick start the rotation when it starts to fail.
@@deadlynytshayd2220 impossible.
1:52 Wait a minute...
Ww3 starts now
“The hardest part of designing a ‘Perpetual Motion Machine’ is deciding where to hide the batteries.”
I did it ... AND NOW I CAN'T DO MORE BY THE WHEEL ... DO YOU HAVE THE BRAKE VERSION ??? ua-cam.com/video/DwOblAnQnh4/v-deo.html
No no no the thinking part is more harder
Epic comment!!!
Ok we got it would you knock it off?
Infinite energy = duplicating energy so plug in battery to a motor and motor will spin a wheel and wheel can make energy to power the battery that is powering a motor, i lost some brain cells when writing this
1:57 New perpetual motion wheel! Spins all the way to Poland!
Lmao
@@indridcold8433 Der Führer startete diese perpetuum mobile am Anfang des dritten Reichs
@@indridcold8433 the way this reads, just perfect of how Germans would speak this!
ya, he titled his video "The Gravity Wheel", oh! maybe you read the same thing, I'm thinking not though. .. .. ... .
There is no such thing as a perpetual motion it is impossible
We need a lot more of this kind of thing, exposing scammers who build things that don't work without the hidden battery/motor.
freddyzdead1 why? Its not like anyone cares
Does it really need debunking at all? It is rather self debunking when it is said to be perpetual motion. It is rather like saying the planet is flat. Does that really need debunking at all? It is rather self debunking. BGhosts, astro projection, honest politicians, and a bunch of other babble are self debunking.
Anyone who says they designed a Perpetual Motion Machine and asks for money is a Scammer because PPM are impossible due to the law of conservation. Every form of energy is continuously deteriorating into several other smaller forms of energy as it interacts. These machines will Never work without some form of external power input. Just like your device that needs to be charged before use. Or a TV or appliance that needs to be plugged in to work. Hell even a Bicycle requires a rider to put in the energy to make it work. Your pencil isn't gonna do your homework for you. Things that don't work without a battery or a motor? How well will your car/truck run without those? Power drill? Insert device name here!?
Germany unveiling new wind turbine design: 1:53
Poland: 🙃
A designed that was tested on Poland with great effect.
Homer Simpson to Lisa Simpson: "In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!"
I did it ... AND NOW I CAN'T DO MORE BY THE WHEEL ... DO YOU HAVE THE BRAKE VERSION ??? ua-cam.com/video/DwOblAnQnh4/v-deo.html
Пиздеш он рабрэотать не будет
Thanks for talking me out of trying this design.
Perpetual motion is impossible in closed system just like overunity is impossible in closed electrical system. The system must be open and use external source of energy, by tapping into either manufactured or natural source of energy.
I agree. There are three main "free energy" devices that actually work: Wind turbines, Solar panels, and Water wheels/turbines. They work by converting kinetic energy, or transducing radiant energy. Simply converting available energy into something usable.
@@vincentrobinette1507 Four actually. Atmospheric electricity works as well. ua-cam.com/video/ENeDkGce5-4/v-deo.html Birkeland currents from space are the source of atmospheric electricity. ua-cam.com/play/PLwOAYhBuU3UeKWHRrCw4i-KviQnAhQhBM.html
Define "closed system"
Agree..
@@mr.knightthedetective7435 i'll try. Closed system is the system that does not change it's state by it's outside.
(1) A counterweight can cause upward motion in something lighter which is supported. T
(2) Something lighter can apply leverage when not supported. T
(3) Support can be shallowly upward-directed because the resistance is about the same as 50% mass. T
1:53 Nazi perpetual motion machine maybe that's how they invented the wounder waffel 🤔
Do you mean a Wunderwaffe?
Ardanwin let the man have his moment
I did it ... AND NOW I CAN'T DO MORE BY THE WHEEL ... DO YOU HAVE THE BRAKE VERSION ??? ua-cam.com/video/DwOblAnQnh4/v-deo.html
Yes, it's a new twist on an old design that didn't work back then, and still doesn't work now.
I see the UA-cam algorithm has brought us together again....
The lever effect from the opposite sides can foul you thinking that it can have a positive momentum gain, but what needs to be observed is that, the TIME that these levers are exercising positive and negative forces on each side. So the net gain is null, minus the frictions of the mechanisme
I think a good design can be the Wheel with Nitinol Springs and some kind of cold or warm water also.
Cold and warm water actually could work, you can extract existing energy by the differential in temperature between them, making such a device an engine, not a perpetual motion machine. Stirling engines work based on this principle of heat flowing from a 'warm' side to a 'cold' side.
So do air conditioners but they all require an external source of energy to create the differential in the first place. For example heating the water.
The weights on the falling side is farther from the center of the wheel. So it has more leverage.
I'm IMPRESSED!!!
Ones the gravity wheel stops because nothing has efficiency 100%. :)
Howdy.
When a spoke tilts it will produce a counter force on the wheel.
Regards.
I have seen a very large pendulum in the British Museum that relied on the earth’s rotation for perpetual motion. It might be worth a podcast.
Beverly clock?
It won't be .
A magnetic wheel with the induction of a fixed coil can be timmed and transmitted anywhere on the circle to effect disequalibrium.
If use magnets then the magnetic field becomes the source of energy , even if works continuously it won't be classified as a perpetual motion machine
1 only if there is a leakage of flux will a magnet decay, 2 anything that has motion need to have a source of energy present to exist this is called rest mass and momentum with respect to the center origin point of the universe so technically everything is classified as a PMM
Merci pour vos explications au sujet du mouvement perpétuels; génial , super génial
Thanks for all your honesty, much appreciated on UA-cam.
Thank you. And thanks for the comment.
@@seemlyme I think that I see what you'ee suggesting - the water ending up at a higher altitude and thus having more potential energy, right?
I think that, at the time when the balloon is almost empty, there will not be enough pressure left in it to squirt the last of the water out. And before that, as the pressure is still dropping in the balloon, the water would squirt out at lower and lower speeds as the pressure drops, not reaching the same height as it used to when the balloon was full. So, you couldn't catch it at the same height. If you successfully move some of the water up by some amount, which I believe you could do using this design, you would have to move some of the water down, too. So the overall gravitational potential energy won't go up. Besides this, there is friction involved in fluid dynamics, the amount I'm not sure of but it is there. So, the friction will inevitably convert some of your initial potential energy into heat energy, which is basically a loss because of how hard it is to recapture 100% of the lost heat energy.
Carter Tangeman Free Energy Device apparatus comprising,
A positive buoyant stable box tin body having at the base (inside) an Extendable/Retractable chamber with locking mechanism to open and close chamber for incoming water through a hole which is pushing the top part of the chamber by buoyant force of liquid/water to store elastic/ gravitational potential energy then use the energy to pressurise the water in the chamber in enclosed environment then push the chamber water above the surrounding water level through a hole opening on the top of the chamber and above the chamber extendable limit to produce potential free energy in the form of liquid/water to end up with surrounding water to repeat the cycle of water.
@@seemlyme tbh, you can't create energy, only manipulate it. And although you can certainly extract existing energy "for free" it isn't something that didn't exist before. Anytime you get energy out of a system, that same amount of energy was taken from elsewhere (eg: an external source of energy like a battery or a burning candle releasing heat) or else it was transformed from another type of energy already present.
For example, cars getting kinetic energy from the motion of pistons, driven by an ongoing reaction which takes gasoline (with a high energy density) and combines it with oxygen and heat, turning it into water vapour, carbon dioxide and some carbon monoxide (each of which has a low energy density compared to gasoline, and can't be combusted in the same way). The energy releases in this reaction is in the form of heat, and the gasses produced are therefore at high pressure (another form of potential energy), which is what pushes the piston, giving most of that energy to the drivetrain of the vehicle, which turns it into rotational motion to trun the wheels, which turn it back into linear motion as the car moves forward.
Another example is the electromagnet. Since a static (unchanging) magnetic field doesn't consume energy, all of the energy put into an electromagnet after the first few seconds turns into heat. The way physics works, the byproduct of this transaction is a magnetic field. Even an electric motor, which uses energy only to power these electromagnets, can't be 100% efficient, because a lot of the energy you put into it comes out as heat, not to mention friction, which is always at play and does the same thing.
My point is simply that all machines and all interactions transform energy in some way, but none of them use it up. In the same way, no generator or solar panel or turbine or chemical reaction actually produces energy; they only transform it. At the core of these machines and of any real interaction is the fact that energy can neither be created nor destroyed. This is, in fact, at the heart of science and our understanding of physics. We wouldn't have mmodern science as it is today without this understanding. I don't intend to humiliate you or anyone else, but I do want you to understand for your own benefit that this is how things work. What do you think?
Carter Tangeman I need some time to talk about the workings of the device more.
it might help to put magnets between each arm on the wheel witch would pull the arm over at the top and release at the bottom of the rotation
I just love honesty. Thanks.
Got a brilliant idea but all l need
is to get going on it.
Same .
Here's how to make a perpetual motion machine. It has a lot of advanced physics behind it that most people won't understand due to the complex nature of how the machine works. Here are the steps to the construction of the machine. Step one, grab your portal gun, step 2 shoot a portal on the floor, step 3 shoot the other portal directly above the portal on the floor. Step 4, jump in. Congratulations you have just completed you perpetual motion machine. All you need to do now is to find out how to turn air resistance into electricity.
1:53 Salute
Hail!
From Berlin to Warsaw in one wheel
@@plasma7704 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
To paraphrase a point XKCD made, just ask yourself this question:
If even *one* of these things worked (i.e a device that produces infinite, free energy) why hasn’t somebody made a commercial version and become a multi-godzillionaire?
May be you should try with some other wheel with less weight instead of cycle rim
You might want the weights at the end of the wood planks to move closer to the wheel as the planks begin to fold bringing them closer to the wheel as they are being raised and then move to the most outer position when the plank flips over giving some momentum in the process....
The weights will need to be able to slide back and forth tied to possibly some fishing wire that is attached to the weight and the rim with a cam at the base of the plank which will cause the position of the planks to pull on the fishing wire to position the weight....
That way, all the weights going up should be closer to the rim and the downward going weights being extended to their maximum....
Not sure if this works but I think it would ad a difference in the weight going down to the weight going up....
Great video. I think if the gravity pull side continually had more leverage the lifting side would be kept in motion. Imagine the spokes riding an oval cam in the center. The pull side always longer- lift side always shorter and continually changing lengths as it rotates.
If you had a spring mounted weight that could spring to the distal end and retract to proximal end at specific times it might work
Короче всё понятно, страдания хренью никто не отменял
Thank you for your honest view. Energy cannot be created nor be destroyed but can be transfered.
Then how did all the energy that does exist originate?
@@davidhamilton8984 nobody really knows. Some think there is a divide between energy and negative energy such that the net energy in the universe is zero. Some think time goes forever in both directions and energy is just a constant that exists. Some point to Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle and say we are just part of a wave function in a superposition. Others say God. Really not yet enough evidence one way or another
That is cool.... but I suppose the best thing that will be very close to an actual perpetual motion machine is a drinking bird in cooperated with a piezoelectric crystal (For contact) or even a magnet motor for electrical generation.... The water part of the drinking bird may be connected to a passive air condenser which regenerates the evaporated water....
As far as there is water, the drinking bird can go on forever
yep, as long as they have water they don't stop, i have one myself and i tried to hook a water condenser to it, sadly even if the bird lasts days without adding more water, the condenser is too slow, and even if it was fast enough you still need to change it condensing chemicals once every 2 months or so
so i think using water from the rain will be the best way of passive generation, but still, if we are going to use water from the rain then it's better just to put a turbine in the water collection pipe
No, not really, there is always water vapour around, there are man made water condensers that are being utilized I countries that do not have access to clean water, they condense water fro the air no mater were they are so far there is water vapour in the air to condenser.... And the only thing a dipping bird needs to work is just a part of its head region damp... so, this tech can be indoors... No need for rain
Those are fun. Thanks for the comment.
i wonder if using external permanent fixed magnets to force a metal weight to fully retracted or just become weightless on the up stroke would help or a wheel surrounded by electro magnets that are powered by the wheel and activated by the wheel as it turns to alway pull an iron weight forward then turn off as the weight approaches activating the next magnet in line?
Instead of putting all the weight on the outside of the wheel, try putting the weights going from the outside-in like a spiral with the most weight on the outside and the least inside on the center of the spook. Just a thought to play with
Not a bad idea.
Took some freeze frames of the one with black water and you can see when one bottle directly above axis the mass distribution of all is uneven.
You should not draw energy from gravity because you will disturb the space-time continuum !!!
:or even change the direction of flow of everything... from eternal expansion back to singularity... wich will cause the certain end of the mythemathical universe :o
Well, that would be reason enough to do it.
MilenierGames true
you can, actually draw energy from gravity, the moon has been doing it since its formation, making it go farther away and slowing the earth rotation. but there is so much energy that we will probably never notice any diference.
Stop walking and stay at home then 😂😂
Years ago I had the idea of two interlocking wheels, like a set of cogs - both with magnets on the ends of the cog tooth. one with north facing, the other with south facing. as they came into contact with each other at the cog intersection point, one pole would repel (or attract, depending on which way you set it up) the other opposite pole. The magnets would not ever actually physically touch, but they would have a brief magnetic field interaction at the intersection point, which the force of repelling (or attracting) would cause the wheels to spin either away, from each other, or toward each other, but it would generate motion: and, as the speed of the wheels (cogs with magnets on the ends) picked up speed, the interactions between the intersection point would increase to a point where the electromagnetic field would cap out at a pretty high speed, never actually coming into contact with each other. Pully's could be attached to the uni-polar magnetic cog wheels and stored in a battery- well at least hypothetically anyway. I had a dream about this alien magnetic generator unit years ago but never actually tried to build it. - I dunno, I''m not a physicist or a mathematician, but could it work?? I have always wondered
Mike Remington no it can't work, the fields on permanent magnets will interfere in the leading edge as much as it "pushes" on the trailing edge. You could always use an electromagnet and rapidly switch it, but all you've done is make an electric motor at that point.
Good work and thanks for your honesty,keep it up.
@@seemlyme .
a few things you failed to take note of:
1. the weight of the bicycle wheel (should be as little as possible, use cardboard/styrofoam for your experiment?),
2. the weight at end of the arms (should be as heavy as possible, without breaking),
3. you ARE harnessing the gravity, which is constant, to make motion, so the 'idiots' out there screaming "perpetual is not possible", they should ask instead how to make for example this wheel 'imbalance' enough to have motion.
4. this is NOT exactly free energy as everyone failed to take into consideration that gravity is always there, same for the permanent magnet 'thing', where the magnetic field is always there until it fails. the problem lies with the configuration, other than the burden of the materials to make those devices.
it is not that hard to make any of these things, the problem is how do you survive after you make a working model, and if you're significant enough for the to not do anything to you, after seeing you as a threat to their constant income. cheers!
hi let's cool the sun by drawing it's energy...
Try using a wheel with two alternating field by using the heavier weight redistribution from the center to move lighter weights to the outer edges of a wheel. It’s not a simple gravity problem but a mechanical actions caused by kinetic energy. A carefully choreographed accident.
Now some of these I would like to try my hand at making with my everlast welder
1:55 love this
1:55 wait
Actually it won't do continusly that because the centre of mass shifts from the centre point and it stop rotating instead it will work as pendulum
It’s always a laugh at people purporting to have invented perpetual motion!
I feel embarrassed that I used to believe in this bullshit
It will happen soon , I guarantee it .
οσο ποιο πολυ δουλεια εχει τοσο καλυτερα να εχει να ασχοληθη καποιος ωραιο ειναι με λιγο βοηθεια ισως εναν κινητηρα θα δουλεψει
Amazing video
I did it ... AND NOW I CAN'T DO MORE BY THE WHEEL ... DO YOU HAVE THE BRAKE VERSION ??? ua-cam.com/video/DwOblAnQnh4/v-deo.html
I saw one work at a science expo in Los Angeles in 1975 and no it did not use an air hose! Take care.
1:52 *DEUTSCHLAND*
Opposing magnetic fields on ferrite rods might work better...it must be anti-gravity and momentum to work. I am sure inductors and capacitors must be used in a oscillating feed back circuit. It must be designed to be like something Nikola Tesla figured out...It was always about amplifying and then feedback with him. You can use negative as much as positive in a signal to make energy production work for you. He learned to use the discharge as much as the charge of the capacitor work for him. He learned how to use the kickback to induce amplification. He did understand AC after all to produce free power. It's his 3-6-9. Go there.
Hi Sunshine
You need first to enlarge the weights at the ends of the wood boards. This will enlarge the moment on the wheel shaft.
An Engineer
Thanks. I also need to use parts that are a bit more solid than what I used in the video.
I would have hoped that an engineer would also understand that by adding weights on the ends it would also be adding weight on the other side of the device.... the moment would change yes but this would do nothing to change the nature of the device.
You’re hardly an engineer if you think a working gravity wheel is possible.
-An actual mechanical engineering student
Waste of time and energy.... bigger weights will only make the opposite side heavier(waste of energy)
Sage Lawrence But how do Water Mills work then if they don't use gravity aswell :/...
The secret of the big wheel if there is one may be that the lower weights are pulling the upper middle weights slightly horiz9ntally.
How many XP points did this build give you?
I have been working on a perpetual motion machine for a long time.. And I can't seem to stop
I was stopped after considering the concept for a few minutes
It is great fun , we must adapt and conquer . Now that I'm thinking about it , it's childs play .
Interesting video, nicely engineered wheel, although the gravity wheel will not work in its present form your idea of magnets to give it a push are interesting, maybe the best thing to come from over unity motors is the discussion and other information found out while experimenting, regards Doc Cox
That's partly why I make the videos. I share what I've learned, and that gives others information to share and expand on and discuss.
Doc Cox over unity is impossible
@@uncopino you should tell that to PMMG4HYBRID .. who is capable of running a motor which feeds itself and generates enough charge to charge things externally.
The biggest challenge is that people always seem to think that these machines are something to be done with only one form of energy transference, like gravity to rotation, but when you start incorporating multiple forms of energy transference, then it is possible to get more out than what you put in. The thing is just working out the methods of energy transference which work well with with each other.
E=0.5VSquared :D the equation for a bipolar coil, works on the basis of 3 motions of energy transference. It's not perpetual motion, but it is pretty cool at amplifying the energy which is supplied, I guess with an interesting enough setup, you may be able to make it feed itself and then absorb the inducted energy at a small enough rate that it's capable of replenishing itself without being effected by the loss itself. But that's just a spitball hypothesis .. would need to make a few things before finding out if the hypothesis is plausible.
Klay you simply don’t get what energy is. you can never get out more than you put in, doesn’t matter how many types of energy transfer are involved. even the idea of trying is just plain stupid. try study some physics instead of throwing equations at me without even knowing what they are. that’s the kinetic energy formula! what bipolar coil are you blabbing about? you guys need to stop trusting pseudo-scientists on youtube ffs
@@uncopino Yep, you can never trust an equation from Nikola Tesla patents.google.com/patent/US512340 and check out this and tell me how it works ua-cam.com/video/UuiFoq9Y7do/v-deo.html
but it's okay .. I just stupid ... SMH
in fact the weight underneath forms a pendulum and nullifies the gravity of those who are just above, you have to put a mechanism that equals the gravity of those from above so that it has the same weight ...
Why never test your design 🤦♂️
See free energy on my channel and share it ua-cam.com/channels/Zkr7nSeLEp9rWPtGUCn2YA.html be sure to subscribe
@@SpaceVoice1 ok?
@@thecoolmanstatus also RIP your dignity
Very good explanation . Thanks
1:41 it is backwards 😂😂😂
BIN LADIN! YOUR ALIVE
What about a strong magnet at the very bottom left of the wheel, with magnets on them instead of weights, with the magent and magnet weights placed in such a way that the magnet will attracted them then repulse them once the magnet reaches the pisition of thw wheel where it starts attracting another magnet on the wheel, as if not the magnet will work against the motion also, that seems like it would get max use out of the magnet, just a thought
You all sound like the scientist who said flying is impossible
Wilton Carter its not like flying at all. It is just impossible
Flying doesn't violate physics.
We have an entire study on the physics of flying objects, it's called aerodynamics. Flight has been attainable for certain animals since before the dinosaurs, there has never been an animal or system created by natural or artificial means that produces more energy in a closed system than what said closed system started with.
Wilton Carter and you sound delusional
Steven Wrigley But people once said it did.
The only way for this offset to work is to have and axis for the wheel be momentum driven to shift left to right or right to left and back and forth on the spin.
No gravity wheels work. You are wasting your time.
It will work if properly the model made
SK Entertainment's basic physics don't agree
Yes no gravity wheel works, but studies will give more application
Thank you
Impossible
Just so you know UA-cam just suggested your content to me. Keep posting as UA-cam is starting to like you. Don’t stop posting.
Will do, thanks!
1:54 Hitler 👍
The issue is that springs exhibit a non- even force so that the arm is not itself balanced. If the arms maintained balance with gravity over at least 1/4th the wheel, then the idea would work. The core issue is that in this config, it takes energy to raise the arms, in order to cause the imbalance. You need to cancel the force on the arms so that raising or lowering costs no energy (just friction at the bearing). But you can't do that with those springs, their foce curves are all wrong.
Русские, лайкните мой комментарий, пусть иностранци думают что я что то дельное написал :-)
Виталий Абашкин
Иностранцы в этом же ютубе видят, что russia это страна жуликов, воров и бандитов. Вот несколько роликов для примера, и подобных роликов - очень много. Герои этих роликов находятся близко к вершине российского общества. Они лицо страны.
ua-cam.com/video/fe4rPbhqyl8/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/yQ4_-PeHAcI/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/ecSFOC0ulBA/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/QcSmT5WD2qs/v-deo.html
@@DoctorBetterverywell
Пробирку Пауэла покажи сначала, потом говори про жуликов.
Виталий Абашкин , а ты поменяй всего одну заглавную букффу на "Е" , в своей фио и я тебя просто залайкаю )) !
I think you was on the right track when you brought in the springs... Maybe you could adjust the Springs tension to fold the weighted arms outwards at just the right time to keep the wheel in motion... Basicly the springs will do all the work...
SWASTIK`S 😀😁😁
yester years cassettes player had that mechanical mechanism , the cassette used to spring out when eject button was press, similar mechanism might make it work, anything that pushes those arms off banlance ahead of its time, another idea would be a fixed notch placed such that rotations help it press the arm forward , like a Seesaw
oh and about the mercury design, that can be done with a heavy metal ball moving at both sides in the pipes.
No matter what you do, as long as there is some kind of friction/resistance, its given initial energy will be wasted and it will stop.
You have to create in the space of the wheel forces that cancel the gravitational field and a non symmetric field of forces that would provide energy to the wheel, but in that case you have to provide energy for the existence of the asymmetric field.
Simply, you can not create energy from nothing, but an initial given kinetic energy could be maintained only in the case you eliminated any possibility of transformation to another form of energy.
If we add some magnets for pull and push I think this design can work but there are so many complications.
Remove the spring
Cut about 5 inches (guess)
Add a latch to the the section cut, connecting the pieces. It will have more of an impact fall
There is a method to do this..you can create a modal with weight attached to end of each rod..then move it outwards when it is about to start falling down.with this you can change the centre of mass move little bit outwards.. I think this method might be worked.. if you are interested please try...
The wheel needs an uneven number of weights with the same distances. 15 elements by 24 degree or 9 elements by 40 degree.
I think a string connecting each wooden paddle to the one in front of it, should pull the next, paddle behind it into position to continue rotation.
Why are people still bothering building perpetual motion machines, it’s impossible
But look at the earth in space.
Need to use small Magnets for the Weights , and , a Linear repullsor array needs to placed on the descending side at a point just beyond where the Arms have dropped , against Solid Stops . This where you may pick up some Push in the System . On that brief Downstroke . Perhaps Shorter Arms and more numerous .
Gravity is a conservative force. Look up what that means on Wikipedia. Consider this... An objects gravitational potential energy depends on its height. So if it falls from H1 to H2 the energy released is proportional to H1 - H2. The same applies to the energy required to lift something. It only depends on the change in height. As consequence of this this if an object ever returns to the same place the net work done by gravity will be zero. If a mountain climber returns to his hotel after climbing a mountain the work he does against gravity on the way up is equal to the work gravity does on him on the way down. Net result zero. The important thing to understand is that only the change in height matters (eg H1- H2) the path taken between those two heights does not matter. Likewise it does not matter which route the climber takes, if he returns to his hotel the net work done against gravity is zero. It might not feel like that to him but thats because humans are inefficient machines (They dont even have regenerative braking). If the path taken doesnt matter this means that ANY gravity powered machine that returns to the same position (eg one that rotates) cannot do work.
So you admit that perpetual motion machines "PMM" are indeed impossible but still fun quirky mechanisms to create or admire even though there is no net gain of usable energy. Water is the best gravity fed energy storage medium. No system can break the law of conservation. Weather its heat transfer, friction, gravity or EMF's. The more parts you add the more energy is required to make it work. Even a ball suspended with magnets in a vacuum chamber would eventually stop due to the force of gravity. Even if you put that same chamber with its spinning ball into geosynchronous orbit. It would slow the loss of energy quite a bit by reducing friction and the effect of gravity but you can only minimize the effect to a limit. All things interact with all other things in the universe like a rainbow ripple of every conceivable wavelength if energy, color & matter.
It will not spin forever due to the friction in the middle where the axis is- the friction will eventually slow it and stop the wheek from spinning
Could you use weights that slide from the base to the end? That might add just enough umph to make it keep going
You could have at least give it a push and let us see what happens
even push it doesnt work he didnt managed to complete.
It’s not perpetual, but it still looks cool
Extend your weights out further and have repelling magnetic forces with neodymium magnets to help "over balance" and increase efficiency
You could do this using only the pushing force of magnets. If your machine could feel the pull of the magnet it would again even itself out. Makes me wonder would the magnet be the energy source the hidden battery?? Even it worked its far from Perpetual motion.
In order to cause the weighted arms to drop faster......you would have to add energy.
2.00 if you put another horisontal line you see water on the left bottle far from center that water in the right bottle ... if that need to balance and that must rotate wheel untill they come to stabe position. please try to make with bottles ...
I believe the only way to get this to work is if you could somehow alter gravity to be greater than 1g on one side and 1g or less on the other. Magnets wear out over time. Then again, the device altering gravity would probably wear out as well but we don't know what it would be so it's also possible that it doesn't wear out.
How about using a relaxed spring on the weight instead of the paint stick. Then replace the paint stick with a metal track for the weight to spring in and out from?
The automotive crankshaft is of the same principle. Your hand starting this is the same like an electric starter of an automobile.
The water inside the bottles is creating continuous momentum like how gasoline blows in cylinders
The very car engine itself is very close to perpetual motion. Alternator and a starter, along with a battery, make a closed cycle system. A motor just won't spin if the alternator and battery are connected to it. The battery would just keep draining and won't even be kept at steady level at all given that it is charged by the alternator. But it is not considered as a perpetual motion machine because it is intended to burn gasoline, which is an external energy source.
The common missunderstanding of Gravity Wheel ist, that when the arm or the Walther ist flowing Backwards in the bottom of the wheel there ist a counter force to the wheel wich will Balance the while system Out, therefore no plus in Energy, it's a simple missunderstanding.
I am still finding a way to get some free energy from the wheels, the earth's gravity anyhow stop the wheel rotation after few seconds
I have looked at all your comments which is an honest reply but this thing might work with quite a bit of modification looked at water bottles analysis and see why it does not work because the weight of the liquid which is the same problem with you fix weight balances out going to give it a try