I'm always a bit puzzled why the callouts used in planes are so... bad? It's like the engineers wanted them to sound as robotic as possible. Like they didn't even seem to capture the "N" in terrain, so it sounds like terray lol
@@RyanZ225_PC I know how old the A300 is, but why does that matter here? I don't think they were that limited in audio storage. I mean, these companies probably don't care too much about making something polished, but still. From a technological perspective, it wouldn't have been hard, even back then. Let alone the random assortment of voices used. It gets the point across, sure, but it just seems unpolished for a very expensive machine. And it continues into the modern day
@@ryanatkinson2978 Another factor worth mentioning is the recordings themselves. I don’t know where the OP got them from but it certainly sounds a lot more distorted from a microphone recording and a lot of background noise (from engines, airflow, cockpit fans, etc). If you listen to microphone recordings of GPWS tests by engineers, the voices are a lot more easier to understand. But yeah from my previous point, this aircraft is very old as you know, and newer Airbuses are a lot easier to understand, such as in the A320 so maybe they used generated synthetic voices.
the pull up alarm sounds like a man trying to be a baddie "WHOOP WHOOP Pull uppp~💅"
💀
wtf
the original A300 didnt have any RA callouts
I'm always a bit puzzled why the callouts used in planes are so... bad? It's like the engineers wanted them to sound as robotic as possible. Like they didn't even seem to capture the "N" in terrain, so it sounds like terray lol
Idk
You realise that this aircraft is like 40 years old right?
@@RyanZ225_PC I know how old the A300 is, but why does that matter here? I don't think they were that limited in audio storage. I mean, these companies probably don't care too much about making something polished, but still. From a technological perspective, it wouldn't have been hard, even back then. Let alone the random assortment of voices used. It gets the point across, sure, but it just seems unpolished for a very expensive machine. And it continues into the modern day
@@ryanatkinson2978 Another factor worth mentioning is the recordings themselves. I don’t know where the OP got them from but it certainly sounds a lot more distorted from a microphone recording and a lot of background noise (from engines, airflow, cockpit fans, etc). If you listen to microphone recordings of GPWS tests by engineers, the voices are a lot more easier to understand. But yeah from my previous point, this aircraft is very old as you know, and newer Airbuses are a lot easier to understand, such as in the A320 so maybe they used generated synthetic voices.
You didn’t include the windshar
Too low terriqn sounds goofy 0:16