Repo: How Roughly $1 Trillion Moves Overnight | WSJ

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 жов 2019
  • The repo market shook the financial world in September when an unexpected rate spike choked short-term lending, spurring the Federal Reserve to intervene. WSJ explains how this critical, but murky part of the financial system works, and why some banks say the crunch could have been prevented.
    Illustration: Jacob Reynolds for The Wall Street Journal
    More from the Wall Street Journal:
    Visit WSJ.com: www.wsj.com
    Visit the WSJ Video Center: wsj.com/video
    On Facebook: / videos
    On Twitter: / wsj
    On Snapchat: on.wsj.com/2ratjSM
    #WSJ #Repo #Economics

КОМЕНТАРІ • 511

  • @kanderson5555
    @kanderson5555 4 роки тому +728

    "Why did the Karens suddenly stop lending?"
    Because they needed to speak to the manager

    • @Miii_Houp
      @Miii_Houp 4 роки тому +7

      Didn't they gave 3 reasons? Two Financial Deadline and a Rule to keep banks solvent? ZeroHedge said it was JPMorgan crashing the Repo to get what they want, to deregulate and to do what ever they want again, and also get QE.

    • @Dear_Mr._Isaiah_Deringer
      @Dear_Mr._Isaiah_Deringer 4 роки тому +3

      @@Miii_Houp it all seems a bit shady because those two were dates that didn't came out of nowhere.

    • @zzlee79
      @zzlee79 4 роки тому +3

      @@Miii_Houp my boss told me one unforgettable quote, "Christmas happens on every 25th Dec".
      Sorry, I don't buy the above 2 reasons. banks knows how much commitments and the timeline way in advance. the rule wasn't set yesterday.
      yes, the last one which is the JP's doing is one of the probable reason.

    • @vincentconti3633
      @vincentconti3633 4 роки тому

      @@zzlee79 the original JP was famous for manipulation of the markets! One tactic became known as the Friday afternoon crash!

    • @YamamotoGenryuusai
      @YamamotoGenryuusai 4 роки тому +3

      😂😂 ok get your like and gtfoh 🤣

  • @JackEdward158
    @JackEdward158 4 роки тому +47

    I love the simplicity of WSJ explanation of financial concepts. Way to go!

    • @raybod1775
      @raybod1775 4 роки тому +3

      They don't tell the full truth.

    • @westcoastflaneur
      @westcoastflaneur 4 роки тому +1

      @@raybod1775 do tell.

    • @vihodanyet
      @vihodanyet 3 роки тому +1

      Too simple.. doesnt explain alot

  • @JohnDoe-mx1sq
    @JohnDoe-mx1sq 4 роки тому +48

    Remember when this was only going to last for a few weeks?

  • @fournya
    @fournya 4 роки тому +117

    The WSJ just called paying taxes “having funds sucked out of accounts by the fed” 🙄

    • @marcpena3197
      @marcpena3197 4 роки тому +11

      That is literally what happens,

    • @beardandbrew403
      @beardandbrew403 4 роки тому +19

      To be fair the WSJ said it was being sucked into the Treasury, not the Fed. I think its important to note the distinction. I am not a Fed fan, but your quote is incorrect.

    • @HusseinDoha
      @HusseinDoha 4 роки тому +1

      @@marcpena3197 No. The banks just paid their taxes. By the way, quarterly tax bills are not that high compared to the volume of cash in daily repo-market.

    • @HusseinDoha
      @HusseinDoha 4 роки тому +1

      @@beardandbrew403 That's what the commentator meant. You didn't brought anything new. Quarterly taxes are paid to the treasury. The WSJ analysis is a bit for the birds. The quarterly tax bills for banks are not that high compared to the volume exchanged in the repo-market. And the liquidity problem lasted for couple of weeks. That reason is not convincing.

  • @nickyc1784
    @nickyc1784 4 роки тому +165

    Theres def a few banks that almost went broke but they wont tell us who.

    • @greggascoigne941
      @greggascoigne941 4 роки тому +23

      Nick Chungo They’re all broke, Fify!

    • @hydrohedinvictus8697
      @hydrohedinvictus8697 4 роки тому +17

      citi bank is one, friend of a friend couldnt pull cash out... why do you think that is? they didnt have any cash to give him!

    • @victorarboleda8633
      @victorarboleda8633 4 роки тому +20

      Deutsche Bank is probably the bank. We will find out this upcoming spring

    • @cayetanosoler3432
      @cayetanosoler3432 4 роки тому +3

      @@victorarboleda8633 ....sooner than that !!

    • @ngomaibinda
      @ngomaibinda 4 роки тому +1

      Exactly

  • @kimdejot
    @kimdejot 4 роки тому +1

    Amazing video, FEDs participation in repo beautifully explained after I couldn't find it in any other source. Thank you!

  • @TheLiamster
    @TheLiamster 4 роки тому +191

    Me: *Looks at chart*
    *STONKS*

  • @briansimpson6710
    @briansimpson6710 4 роки тому +7

    banks short-stock trading themselves into negative returns to get more cash on hand... and then complaining that the reason they didn't have the cash on hand is because of new rules put in place requiring them to keep more cash on hand. It's almost as if banks are recklessly dealing with their funds in a way that is liable to destroy the financial system again.

    • @raybod1775
      @raybod1775 4 роки тому +1

      That's why we need the Glass-Steagall Act restored.

  • @Marco-wz8xw
    @Marco-wz8xw 4 роки тому +4

    LCRs exist in Brazil since 2002. It՚s also worth noting that even prior to implementing
    LCR requirements to the most systemically important
    banks in Brazil in October 2015, the Central Bank of Brazil has been monitoring the liquidity risk incurred by all the Brazilian banks on a daily basis since 2002. This liquidity monitoring process is performed by means of an indicator conceptually similar to the LCR denominated Liquidity Indicator (LI).

  • @niteshkumarpatel
    @niteshkumarpatel 4 роки тому +18

    This is quality journalism.

    • @WisdomIsPrecious
      @WisdomIsPrecious 4 роки тому +4

      Nitesh Patel not really. It’s a watered down perspective for sheeple

    • @markgreen2170
      @markgreen2170 2 роки тому

      @@WisdomIsPrecious EXACTLY!

  • @KimetsuNoYaiba100
    @KimetsuNoYaiba100 Рік тому

    When I first watched repo crisis in the news in Sep 2019, I barely understood what had happened. Fast forward almost 3 years, now I'm able to grasp the full wiring of the financial system and how crucial repo market is.

  • @anshuanand90
    @anshuanand90 3 роки тому

    What a great content !

  • @cliftonparchment4498
    @cliftonparchment4498 4 роки тому +1

    I’ve always been curious how banks made money over night. Great educational video. 👍🏽👍🏽

  • @smoothacceleration437
    @smoothacceleration437 4 роки тому +189

    How convenient when a whole industry has a specially dedicated government entity to bail them out every time they need it... Socialism for the rich.

    • @noekahn2073
      @noekahn2073 4 роки тому +7

      except thousands upon thousands are dependent on the well being of these industries

    • @davelowe1977
      @davelowe1977 4 роки тому +8

      Smooth acceleration
      Except that the fed is a private bank.

    • @davelowe1977
      @davelowe1977 4 роки тому +6

      Sydney Austin
      ...therefore not a government entity.

    • @keeganpaullanzillotta5584
      @keeganpaullanzillotta5584 4 роки тому +2

      Thomas Daniels yes because gold has so much more intrinsic value. Our fiat currency enables economic growth at a scale impossibly with gold standard or other commodity currencies.

    • @davelowe1977
      @davelowe1977 4 роки тому +9

      Keegan Paul Lanzillotta
      No it allows the debasement of the currency supply at a scale impossible with gold. Gold has value precisely because it cannot be printed - it keeps everybody honest.

  • @ManhwaMystics
    @ManhwaMystics 4 роки тому +18

    IMAGINE IF EVERY PERSON OR AT LEAST HALF OF AMERICANS WENT TO BANKS TO WITHDRAW MONEY AT THE SAME TIME

    • @NikolasStow
      @NikolasStow 4 роки тому +3

      doc arham exactly the reason why banks need reserves.

    • @Mr_Battlefield
      @Mr_Battlefield 4 роки тому

      This would be something I would be willing to do just to see what would happen.

    • @halvey8518
      @halvey8518 4 роки тому +6

      Ahmad Haruman You should just watch a short documentary about the Great Depression because that’s what everyone did. All of the banks failed, and everyone lost their money. But today we’re FIDC insured. It would just be madness like always.

    • @TobeornottooB
      @TobeornottooB 4 роки тому

      Do you think half of Americans have money to withdraw?

  • @roderick7415
    @roderick7415 4 роки тому

    Great video 👍

  • @jaco_g6765
    @jaco_g6765 4 роки тому +46

    Everything is fine. Its only one or two insolvent banks with a risk of default so high that no other bank would lend money to for a period of 24 hrs. Keep swiping those credit cards folks, Christmas is just around the corner.

    • @ryanm2051
      @ryanm2051 4 роки тому +1

      Owen Gallagher just European banks tho

    • @Truid312
      @Truid312 4 роки тому +3

      @@ryanm2051 All banks are pretty much chained together. One failing will cause massive stress to the entire system.

  • @connormcgowan2537
    @connormcgowan2537 4 роки тому +96

    0:27 How bankers think an Oiler works.

    • @Dear_Mr._Isaiah_Deringer
      @Dear_Mr._Isaiah_Deringer 4 роки тому +7

      It's also a bit if an understatement what happened a couple weeks ago. Dumping a barrel would have been more proportional.

    • @Anand-qb1wp
      @Anand-qb1wp 4 роки тому +5

      Hah! Had to take a second look to see the handle was moving. Good catch!

    • @justsaying7742
      @justsaying7742 4 роки тому +1

      Then just print cash, then they take your family home. Nice business.

  • @deure8572
    @deure8572 4 роки тому

    Oh I love this macro-economic lesson video

  • @yomammaspoodle
    @yomammaspoodle 4 роки тому +88

    Oh nooo, poor innocent banks had to pay taxes.... Oooh cry me a river...

    • @qinby1182
      @qinby1182 4 роки тому +7

      In all fairness they proppably called it an unexpected event...

    • @scotchy451
      @scotchy451 4 роки тому +3

      without banks very few people would own a car or home.

    • @KD-vg2yn
      @KD-vg2yn 4 роки тому +10

      scotchy451 that doesn’t excuse their corruption.

    • @scotchy451
      @scotchy451 4 роки тому +3

      @@KD-vg2yn Fair but demonizing banks in the way the left does now is very similar to what the nazi's did in the 30's

    • @muntee33
      @muntee33 4 роки тому +2

      scotchy451
      And were they wrong?

  • @daybuttons7541
    @daybuttons7541 4 роки тому +3

    So if banks stopped lending overnight because of 2 financial deadlines in the middle of sep 2019, why does the fed need to provide liquidity until q2 2020?

  • @cooper8t
    @cooper8t 4 роки тому +1

    Question (for myself a newbie, go easy on me).. Would the cash reserves the banks are forced to hold by law ever match or come close to the amount borrowed in these short term "overnight" loans?

  • @invisiblerevolution
    @invisiblerevolution 4 роки тому +1

    Good video....

  • @TheObserver258
    @TheObserver258 4 роки тому +7

    I still don't get the part about how everyone is killing it on Wall Street yet the country is now $23 Trillion dollars in debt. Magic?

    • @timsievers2067
      @timsievers2067 4 роки тому

      @K Kray, were pumping up the bubble and slapping band-aids to any potential tears, just to pump it even more. They stripped all the protections out of Dodd-Frank while keeping this jem, so that they can keep the next "incident" quiet. This is 2008 repeating all over again but they don't have to publically ask for a bail out.

    • @vineetpatel8512
      @vineetpatel8512 4 роки тому

      Two different things? The 23 trillion dollars debt is at result of government deficits. The financial industry is doing good right as many people are using their services (money management, advising, IPOs, etc)

  • @foggymedia
    @foggymedia 4 роки тому +8

    You forgot the most important point IT'S ALL JUST A GAME OF CHARADES!!

  • @solohoh
    @solohoh 4 роки тому +2

    Looks like a game of musical chairs to me -- with real time warnings showing what happens when the music stops playing.

  • @IamTonyStark1
    @IamTonyStark1 4 роки тому +25

    This is more like s patient dying of a heart attack getting adrenaline shot, not lubrication .

    • @Ceedee824
      @Ceedee824 4 роки тому

      Lol u dont get Adrenaline for a heart attack. Except your goal is to explode the heart. Which is what Fed is doing to the Economy.

    • @sandman.38
      @sandman.38 4 роки тому

      C.E.D. r/FUCKINGWOOSH

  • @crispusattucks4007
    @crispusattucks4007 4 роки тому +3

    Every time she ends a sentence with a vocal fry, take a shot

  • @ChristopherWalkenPUA
    @ChristopherWalkenPUA 4 роки тому +41

    Just remember guys, QE4 is not really QE........... bwahahaha

  • @Je.rone_
    @Je.rone_ 4 роки тому +25

    *Economic geniuses in this comment section* 💪🎭

    • @Je.rone_
      @Je.rone_ 4 роки тому +1

      @@muneebiqbal5584 thank you for giving me the opportunity to clarify
      there were only two other comments when i made this comment... So I'm definitely referring to only those two and not the one's that came after it.
      That said. Did i say they were dumb, did i even paint them as dumb? I'd beg to differ, not being a genius doesn't make you dumb, but pretending that economics is not very very nuanced and complex seems imprudent as much as it may be inconsequential unless one has power to act upon it in a way they'll affect large group of individuals.
      In addition i never claim it even implied to be intelligent, I never claimed and do not believe i am of a higher intelligence, that said the two comments that were here upon my initial comment showed a lack of appreciation of the evident nuances and complexities of economics, of which i don't claim to understand or know fully myself, that said I'm acutely aware that it is indeed nuanced. That awareness in that particular instance doesn't make me more intelligent nor does it make be better than any one else...
      Also these videos don't get a lot of comments and views, relative to the subscribers so i figured it wouldn't be too many people who'd see it. 💪

  • @jturner405
    @jturner405 4 роки тому

    Omg they need to keep that rule in place!!! Keep those funds on hold, thanks for this video

  • @boomsuga
    @boomsuga 4 роки тому +5

    @whiteboardfinance is doing such a good job that wsj is taking his ideas

  • @TheYoyozo
    @TheYoyozo 4 роки тому +1

    This video is what you get when a newspaper turns to video production.

  • @ki6eki
    @ki6eki 4 роки тому +16

    Why don’t they just better manage their cash flow like any other business

    • @bishboshs
      @bishboshs 4 роки тому +1

      Because banks have tiny margins and therefore their capital needs deployed as much as possible to turn a profit.

    • @kwamebushman606
      @kwamebushman606 4 роки тому +1

      I work at a bank, we don't manage cash, we MAKE cash. When will people learn

    • @bishboshs
      @bishboshs 4 роки тому +2

      @@kwamebushman606 Unless you work for a central bank you don't "make" cash.

    • @Peter-wp5vb
      @Peter-wp5vb 4 роки тому

      Not as profitable as the alternative

  • @Sjalabais
    @Sjalabais 4 роки тому +66

    So where are the feds 60 billion $ coming from? Reserves? Printing press? Magic wazoo?

    • @forthepeople5066
      @forthepeople5066 4 роки тому +48

      We'll go with Magic Wazoo in order to not frighten people with the Truth. They can't handle it. Lol

    • @gabrielavila2884
      @gabrielavila2884 4 роки тому +47

      It's more elegant now. They can just type zeros into a computer and wazoooooooooo...!

    • @forthepeople5066
      @forthepeople5066 4 роки тому +8

      @@gabrielavila2884 Sheeeeeiiiitt. That's that computer Wazoo interweb magic!

    • @adityamishra6252
      @adityamishra6252 4 роки тому +22

      From the federal reserve. It's basically like transferring money from one of your bank accounts to another. They're just paying themselves

    • @Kunalthemillenial
      @Kunalthemillenial 4 роки тому

      Nice question ... please don’t go following the answer trail to this. !

  • @alonezlciel
    @alonezlciel 4 роки тому +16

    So, FED bailout the bank again, but in different form?

    • @bubblebreak4160
      @bubblebreak4160 4 роки тому +3

      AL Free money for the banks and richest investors

  • @einseitig3391
    @einseitig3391 4 роки тому

    We should all still remember the part Repo 105 played in the financial crisis.

  • @MsXfi
    @MsXfi 3 роки тому

    Wheels just stopped turning.

  • @openmind5363
    @openmind5363 4 роки тому

    So why does the amount of repos keeps going UP significantly ??..when it should be tapering off after their schedule financial statements & payments.

  • @justcallmebookworm7543
    @justcallmebookworm7543 4 роки тому

    Excellent and informative vid!
    Bankers have also pointed to higher capital requirements, which reduce how much they can lend and borrow. The new reforms under the 2010 Frank-Dodd reforms also included repos in calculation of the leverage ratios, which affect the capital requirements. This restricts repo lending, too.

  • @trygveevensen171
    @trygveevensen171 4 роки тому +1

    RIP audio

  • @luddity
    @luddity 4 роки тому

    Will Fintech/automation replace all of those broken mechanisms?

  • @rishiraje
    @rishiraje 4 роки тому +1

    You should explain that at 1% repo rate, Mark would buy back the treasury at 100.00274 dollars the next day

    • @andrewgrant2948
      @andrewgrant2948 4 роки тому

      rishiraje I wondered this too. Its a 1.00 APY

  • @NotAP05
    @NotAP05 4 роки тому

    is it possible for normal people to invest in the lendin part of repo ?

  • @oldworld6270
    @oldworld6270 4 роки тому +3

    Banks and their controllers have been our downfall since their inception.

  • @ACT1O1
    @ACT1O1 4 роки тому

    Need to get my hands on 1% of that

  • @laidav
    @laidav 3 роки тому +1

    Mark: "I got these cheeseburgers man...."

  • @jaridkeen123
    @jaridkeen123 4 роки тому +8

    The LCR needs to be raised. Also they should schedule payments better, this is the main reason that it happened.

  • @keezer4346
    @keezer4346 4 роки тому +18

    When billionaire bankers fail to manage their books, it tells me a recession is coming soon enough.

    • @danstevens64
      @danstevens64 4 роки тому

      Still waiting

    • @ajitmistry5044
      @ajitmistry5044 4 роки тому +1

      Nearly there

    • @primeminister87
      @primeminister87 4 роки тому

      Ajit Mistry definitely here now . Who Would of thought a virus would kick it all off .

  • @endthefed4816
    @endthefed4816 4 роки тому +14

    And Repo intervention is permanent as we speak! So I would love to know which Banks are in trouble!

  • @Ranjankumar-ey1zb
    @Ranjankumar-ey1zb 4 роки тому

    Explanation of repo rate is very confusing . She didn't even explained reverse repo which I think was used here .

  • @subhammallik7816
    @subhammallik7816 4 роки тому

    Great video with easy language

  • @dhanapal2312
    @dhanapal2312 4 роки тому +11

    It's hard to hide the truth for long time, Nature

    • @rkan2
      @rkan2 4 роки тому +2

      Fortunately? Most people either don't have the time or the logic to understand it.

  • @normanoro206
    @normanoro206 4 роки тому +1

    What the Fed's doing is kind of weird, but I think it's better for the banks to keep that cash in reserve rather than using it for repos. It may hurt their bottom line, but if it makes the financial system more resilient against shocks, it's worth it. Who knows when the next shock will happen and where it'll originate from (unfortunately, it is a "when" and not an "if")?

  • @holycrapchris
    @holycrapchris 4 роки тому +24

    Did the fed *need* to step in? There's plenty of Karens on Main St willing to lend overnight at an interest rate of 50%.

    • @vineetpatel8512
      @vineetpatel8512 4 роки тому +4

      Yeah 50% for an overnight lending is a great idea for a financial system.

    • @___Truth___
      @___Truth___ 4 роки тому +1

      @@vineetpatel8512 🤣🤣🤣

    • @rayxr
      @rayxr 4 роки тому +2

      That means the bank Karen was lending to was so insolvent that the risks wasn't worth it. Someone is on the brink of collapse

    • @___Truth___
      @___Truth___ 4 роки тому

      @@rayxr From what premise are you saying they're insolvent? The video clearly says the Fed lends overnight and is paid back accordingly, banks doing that demonstrates that they're solvent. How does that imply a brink of collapse?

    • @rayxr
      @rayxr 4 роки тому +2

      @@___Truth___ I'm saying there's a bank(s) out there trading with toxic assets, high liability, and low liquidity. They're trading and was able to pay overnight, yes, but what they're trading is fundamentally garbage. That's why other banks (Karen) knew not to lend.
      Because that low liquidity bank's financial practice is unsustainable.
      But since this toxic bank(s) got an injection, the Karens continue to trade with such toxic bank...for the time being.

  • @TreasureHunter-hf9ff
    @TreasureHunter-hf9ff 4 роки тому

    So in your example a a 1% repo rate on a $100 paying $101 back overnnight is like a simple interest rate of 360% based on 360 periods a year. If I was to pay a bank loan at a simple rate of 1% on $100, my daily interest rate would be a fraction of a penny a day.

  • @sadiyamulla8067
    @sadiyamulla8067 Рік тому

    So in the US, Repo rate is only overnight?

  • @svonkarmo433
    @svonkarmo433 4 роки тому +4

    "Why did Karens stop lending?"
    -Because Karens are smart. Karens know exactly what the "real world" repo rate should be (read: the banks acted like a drunken sailors who so far never get arrested)

    • @ShovelShovel
      @ShovelShovel 4 роки тому

      Did you not watch the video? It's because of a mandate the govt required to have liquidity so they couldn't lend it out.

  • @MayankSingh-qg4zv
    @MayankSingh-qg4zv 2 роки тому +1

    thank you aunty ji

  • @justsaying7742
    @justsaying7742 4 роки тому +9

    They just print more cash, then they come for your family home, that you thought you owned.

  • @alfrednewman292
    @alfrednewman292 4 роки тому

    That is such an over-simplistic explanation that does not mention so many other things like fractional reserve banking that would put this all in perspective. And another very important factor is that of the theft mentioned were the treasury takes a certain cut by the pronouncement of these lawyers called legislators telling you how much you must give them to misspend and make them rich, you poor, effects this whole story. If the banks have all the money, then who owns the politicians? If everything you own including yourself, is valued in terms of a fiat currency, then what value is property?

  • @threedogsandacamper503
    @threedogsandacamper503 4 роки тому

    The banks have to pay tax every quarter so it’s not as if this was a surprise for them....the surprise lack of liquidity must’ve come from another source...or perhaps the supply was normal and the demand was outsized (?)....

  • @DABA33
    @DABA33 4 роки тому

    So market crash will be July 2020?

  • @berry104
    @berry104 4 роки тому

    *Few days later*
    "Video has been removed by uploader" 🤔

  • @ThaRealERAQ
    @ThaRealERAQ 4 роки тому +2

    That chart shows the banks stopped putting as much into those fed reserves over the past few years. They are intentionally doing this.

  • @sravanvlogs1377
    @sravanvlogs1377 4 роки тому +4

    If LCR was gone then welcome to another crisis like 1929

  • @gaatjeniksaan336
    @gaatjeniksaan336 4 роки тому +27

    so what is the repo market and how does $1 Trilion move overnight?
    O wait it was meant to be explained in this video

    • @gaatjeniksaan336
      @gaatjeniksaan336 4 роки тому +1

      @Abraham Villalobos yes I heard something about 2 persons and that fed is pumping money

    • @philipmolokwu9271
      @philipmolokwu9271 4 роки тому

      @@gaatjeniksaan336 it's basically the stock market but for banks. People are no longer buying stocks so the Fed is taking their place. Basically.

    • @gaatjeniksaan336
      @gaatjeniksaan336 4 роки тому

      @@philipmolokwu9271 where refers ''their'' to? to ''people who no longer buy stocks''?

  • @biotechboliviaoficial5367
    @biotechboliviaoficial5367 4 роки тому

    money out of the air!

  • @mgsp87
    @mgsp87 4 роки тому

    How is this not quantitative easing all over again?

  • @_thacieng
    @_thacieng 4 роки тому

    Love American monetary! I wish I understood it all

  • @JeepCherokeeful
    @JeepCherokeeful 2 роки тому

    So why didn’t they see this ahead of time?

  • @Rethanos
    @Rethanos 4 роки тому

    Those inflation presses are on fire!

  • @GSD-
    @GSD- 4 роки тому

    *had* to step in

  • @John-zh6ld
    @John-zh6ld 4 роки тому

    Pull your money out now and be ready to purchase when it crumbles.

  • @skolarii
    @skolarii 4 роки тому +4

    Isn't it ironic that bankers are terrible with money?

  • @Aniket2712
    @Aniket2712 4 роки тому

    Is repo rate ANNUAL?

  • @whong09
    @whong09 4 роки тому +1

    Yes let's all keep the plates spinning a little longer. Have a slice of pie.

  • @CommonCentsRob
    @CommonCentsRob 3 роки тому +1

    1:48 Wait, banks have a shortage of liquidity but an abundance of Treasury Notes? That doesn't seem right. I thought that banks didn't hold T-notes. Also, why do banks need liquidity in such large quantities?

    • @CommonCentsRob
      @CommonCentsRob 3 роки тому

      Investment Bank Commercial Bank. Also, Treasury Securities.

  • @trygveevensen171
    @trygveevensen171 4 роки тому +1

    The S's are painful

  • @SaeedAhmad-um2zx
    @SaeedAhmad-um2zx 4 роки тому +2

    This is what happened before 2008 recession.

  • @coder3101
    @coder3101 4 роки тому +18

    "I" in "Karen" stands for Intelligence

  • @Steven-xf8mz
    @Steven-xf8mz 4 роки тому +9

    banks always say "if we didn't have to keep all that money in reserve, we would have been able to pick it up" it must be a coincident that these very banks don't have any money during every financial crisis before the next one. LOL. if we relax rules, these money won't be in the reserve to pick up the repo market unless we mandate them to save more just for repo or allow them to use reserve for repo only.

  • @richarddelaguardia4026
    @richarddelaguardia4026 4 роки тому +1

    So Fed keeping expansion moving along.

  • @oswaldocapriles9402
    @oswaldocapriles9402 4 роки тому

    These systems are complex and so elaborated that only their Gurus understand them , take advantage and rip off the unlearned and unaware 90% of the people .

  • @sp0rtbilly77
    @sp0rtbilly77 4 роки тому +6

    BS on technical malfunction...it's new printed 💰

  • @Doyle-Nutbush
    @Doyle-Nutbush 4 роки тому

    And now the Casino is still running, what a complete circus it's all become.

  • @json809
    @json809 4 роки тому

    This isn’t going to end well.

  • @drbatalaale9376
    @drbatalaale9376 4 роки тому

    Tell us who controls federal reserve.

  • @Ohyeahhahaha
    @Ohyeahhahaha 4 роки тому

    From my understanding, it was the banks that needed to borrow, not to lend, but WSJ sounds the other way around.

  • @taubevictor8989
    @taubevictor8989 4 роки тому

    Ballers..."

  • @jeffbeowolf547
    @jeffbeowolf547 4 роки тому +1

    So like me : too big to fail banks are broke but no one’s giving me free money

  • @FOO261
    @FOO261 4 роки тому

    Just shows you how fragile things really are.

  • @franco521
    @franco521 2 роки тому +2

    These freaking Karen's, man.

  • @randylegare8405
    @randylegare8405 4 роки тому +2

    Everything is about to explode.

  • @XD152awesomeness
    @XD152awesomeness 4 роки тому

    You mean to tell me banks should be keeping money in their vaults? What a novel concept!

  • @sleepysartorialist
    @sleepysartorialist 4 роки тому +2

    Karen became everything she hated: the manager.

  • @carlton123456
    @carlton123456 2 роки тому

    Isn’t the overnight banking system what also caused a systemic collapses across more than just the financial industry. Wasn’t the treasury they lent out MBS or CDOs?

  • @jillsmcfarland2001
    @jillsmcfarland2001 4 роки тому

    Why do other reports claim 75 trillion a day .

  • @ZappyOh
    @ZappyOh 4 роки тому

    End the FED.

  • @ryanbmx5
    @ryanbmx5 4 роки тому

    So banks are basically to the point where they risk over-extending themselves and they want to use their reserve money in the meantime? Makes total sense. Short on cash? Just keep dipping into your savings!