The fact that this should even be a controversial title/topic for Christians tells you there is something wrong with people.. (I’m Christian and dinosaurs, aliens and their existence doesn’t bother me, animals inhabiting this world or others doesn’t dissuade a belief if you truly understand it)
Agreed, it’s possible to interpret and incorporate scientific discoveries into a Christian worldview. Do you happen to have any recommendations for understanding aliens through a Christian framework?
@@Programm4r You mean that they dont visit us? Or are you conceited enough to believe that in a known universe that contains some 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 suns, that other sapient being dont exist??
@@archimedesmaid3602 this isn’t star wars. You have all resources right here on earth for life to exist and it can’t be created. Everything on aliens has so far been debunked.
Really happy this has popped into my feed. As an open ignorant disbeliever of god for my own personal reasons, this has really shed some light on questions I’ve had for 30 years. I will take this as a learning and humble myself back to the bible for a read. Thank you sir.
In Dec.1959 a Christian minister got into the Pentagon, with the help of a Christian woman who worked there & met with a benevolent handsome humanlike e.t. being interacting there 3 years & this was the start of nearly 50 years of contact with this being & others with him. Book Stranger At The Pentagon 1967, 72, 91, by Dr. Frank E. Stranges (1927-2008). This e.t. being testified of the God & Jesus Christ of the Bible & told Dr. Stranges that he & they were in an unbroken communion & fellowship with God & Jesus Christ & the universe is filled with e.t. life that did not fall with satan.
@@diabolicaldoodle, this Frank Stranges (1927-2008), when he was in Bible college, he had a fellow student who was a fighter pilot in the Army Air Force during WW 2. He said that he & his fellow squadron fighter pilots during combat missions had their aircraft buzzed by ufos. They tried to tell the higher command but they did not believe them & this got Frank Stranges interested & he started to study ufos & in 1959 he wrote a book Flying Saucerama & in 1963 another book The Truth & Facts on UFOS & E.T.s. This being came to earth 3-16-1957 & the ufo/starcraft landed 14 miles from the Pentagon in a cornfield & the story of what happened afterwards is in the book. Dr. Stranges even went on their ufo/starcraft & ate alien dinners & even slept like overnight. These beings were like handsome young men & the females were like beautiful young women. According to Frank they were human like us even having a waterless shower & an alien advanced toilet on their starcraft, but were also 5th dimensional supernatural beings with mental telepathy!! Unlike the greys, reptilians, tall whites ect, these are the malnevolent ones & they want to enslave humans & worse eat humans! These alien abductions are an evil against humans! BTW the missle that hit the Pentagon (9-11-2001), hit the lodging room this being & others were staying those 3 years of 1957-1960! This according to Dr. Stranges in a video of him speaking in 2007, a year before he died in 2008 at age 81! I can say a lot more but I leave you with this for now. God bless & thank you for your response!!
Neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” - Romans 8:39
@@bitty_beastly47 yeah, so there is not really any other logical explanation for finding the bone of an extinct species other than it existed at one point. Bones don't just form out of mid air. What point were you trying to make haha
@@bitty_beastly47 I had it verified and I gave it to the Rocky Mountain Dinosaur Resource Center in 2009 because the state of Colorado would not let me keep it because I found it in a state park. It's still on display there as far as I know. So yeah, pretty sure it was real haha
@@Theultrazombiekiller taking bones to a dinosaur research center is like asking a black man what they think of the n word. The answer will SHOCK you. When you're a hammer, all you see are nails
Job 40:15 Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox. 16 Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly. 17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together. 18 His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron. 19 He is the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach unto him.
So this guy says something like "this chart is scientific why? because it has scientific words on it." But notice what he does around 1:20. He talks about a dinosaur creature merely existing along and all of a sudden, "poof !" You have a mutated offspring. Talk about language manipulation. "Poof" implies that it happened suddenly, whereas anyone who knows evolution knows that it happens because of tiny variations over LONG periods of time. There is no "poof" but he dismisses the idea of natural selection by using words this way, which is precisely what he accuses the authors of the chart of doing.
Question about your evolution: Where did the information come from to move the changes in an up ward direction. DNA, You can lose information yet to gain it you have to have someone or thing outside the evolutionary process to add it. just asking?
Prove to me that dino's over time mutated in to other creatures! You can't because it didn't happen. DNA disproves the evolutionary theory! Beside we see Mutants today and every time it is a downward direction not to improve the creature or person or plant. It weaken and causes other negative issues. show me one creature that has mutated in to a higher form? you can't it doesn't happen! Explain to me how dino's who are reptilians became birds ? it never happened it could not happen! DNA would not allow it to happen!
I was just talkin about this to my husband this morning before he left for work. I am a born again Christian, I was asking so many questions. The topic of dinosaurs came up and I said to him if dinosaurs were real why aren't they in the Bible? Then out of nowhere I went onto UA-cam and this video was the first one in my feed! This truly cleared up all those questions for me. Talk about a sign from God.. praise you Lord Jesus Christ. Thank you
What is the Bible to you? If dinosaurs were mentioned in the Bible. How would that help you in your life? Would the Bible be more credible to you? please don't take these questions personally. Oh! does Genesis tell you how long day 1 or 2 were? or how old is the earth?
I remember having this same discussion with my mother and our pastor when I was a kid, I loved dinosaurs and my mother would say they not in the Bible so they didn't really exist and for me I'm at the museum like they right here so we know they existed. Then it hit me, we as humans are the most educated arrogant creatures ever, I said mom, when God created the heaven and the earth in 7 days, who said 7 days was 24 hrs each? To God 7 days could ver easy be 7 millennium, and then she conceded. Now I don't agree with everything he is saying as far as the dinosaurs died in Noah's flood because no human existed in the same period of time as dinosaurs.
@@ericperry72 I am not looking to change minds just pure discussion on what G'd says, not what I or you think. But one can't not just read the Bible (Old Testament) without the knowledge Hebrew, the Oral Bible and a Bible expert. In the first sentence in Genesis there is a word that has no translation. "et" not eet short e. They are the first and the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet. The first thing G'd created was Language/speech. "And there was evening and there was morning." ONE DAY G'd did not called it FIRST DAY Why? I know there is a lot here. Just think about it Thank you for your time.
@@eliedecastro5716 that's the thing about the Bible, the text can sometimes be hard to interpret correctly and the language is not always written in the most concise way. And this dialogue was welcome.
@@ericperry72Thank you, I hope this doesn't affect the conversation, every time I say that I am a religious Jew, people clime up. I don't try to convince or convert anyone I don't put anyone one down. I just like to discuss what the Bible (Torah) says What G'd has to say. The Bible was written in a Holy language, there is no other one like it. It does not make sense in any other language. If everything was to be explained in the Torah (Bible) you would need a crane to lift the book. This one of the reasons G'd also gave us the Oral Torah. Take Numbers 15:37-41 impossible to know what it is, how to make them,. Each tribe would have different type tzitzis. If you learn it in the original form Oh! you would see thousands of light bulbs coming on in your Thank you for your time
I like how people say, I read the Bible 3 times and I know ....... Without your eyes being opened, the Bible is just a story. That's why it takes dedication and seeking the truth with pure heart, and yes if u r honest with yourself and not just a talker, they will be opened, for u not for u to build yourself up
Do you know how ridiculous that is? Do you realize how many people think the way you do and see almost every passage in the book differently and each one is convicted the Holy Spirit showed them the truth. Stop and think about that.
Parts are history, but it's a menagerie of stories, allegories, poems, laws, and interpretations. All being put together by a pagan king in Nicea, with a council of monks, devotees, nomadic tribes, and churches John wrote.
@@Timmeh_The_tyrant: That's weird, 'cause I understood everything he wrote easily enough? Why didn't you? It's not hard if you listen WITH your heart and not your stubborn mind. You gotta let go of 'SELF' and learn to TRUST.
The “cognitive dissonance” you’re referring to is the belief that you should form beliefs based on evidence rather than bronze-age myths. You’re literally thanking the poster of this vid for assisting you in some odd desire to be irrational.
@@skepticalobserver7484 the same people saying Christianity is false and science is king also say men can be women and vice versa. Everyone's got their own religion. Stick to yours and stop bashing others.
I had the pleasure back in the 80's to hear a great talk by a guy they called Dr dinosaur and he answered so many questions about dinosaurs from the Bible, I loved it
What a coincidence! I also received an education about dinosaurs well over a quarter-century ago. I didn’t see “Dr. Dinosaur,” I learned from two guys named Hanna and Barbera. Like you, I also loved it! Then I turned 9 and began to become interested in what is actually true.
Skeptical Observer Like bones you can walk up to in a museum ? A guy in the comments above actually found a dinosaur bone, and others find teeth and claws on rare occasions.
@@asahmosskmf4639 maybe I’m misunderstanding you or you’re misunderstanding me. Dinosaurs are real. Science is real. People didn’t live at the same time as dinosaurs did. I’m opposed to people overlooking those facts in favor of unsupported religious BS
He keeps saying “all we need to do is think this through”. Gives example that in the ark, the dinosaurs must have been smaller dinosaurs of reproductive age. The Bible said nothing of this at all, and he is purely speculating…this is the same thing he accuses the scientist of doing (when he was presenting that big chart with yellow and gray lines)
Unlike scientists he never presented it as fact. (Then later change their mind) and offers us to think it through. Science talking about "billions" and "millions of years" is like talking about pigs flying - its possible,like anything else we haven't seen it. How many scientific advices have we seen about basic things like diet - completely changed even over the last 10 years. How many of scientific theories have been totally changed over 200 years....Yet these morons speak of Billions....All science can do is prove what is right under their very nose and observed in its full form -NOTHING ELSE. Yes the bible does say two of each kind of animal able to reproduce, but we don't know when ? Do you also know when a dinosaur can reproduce...Also why are there thousands of paintings ;-Cave and other, of complete dinosaurs in the last 5000 years before modern science even existed. BECAUSE PEOPLE SAW THEM.. THATS WHY.
@pauledsall5849 Yeah because these scientists have been studying for 7 Billion years, right? And they actually saw what happened or took written evidence from those that did .In the meantime we’ll throw away thousands of years of testimony, eye witness reports,from several different cultures that actually saw these things, confirmed them only thousands of years ago..Yeah that makes a-lot more sense to me.. NOT ! We’ll just farm out our faith & trust to Politicians and Scientists Because They Always Tell us the Truth & Never Get it Wrong, And they Never Have Their Own Agendas And Reasons, Neither of Them Have Changed Their Minds Once on Anything of Real Importance & We’ll just Ignore Ancestors and Any Other Direct Witness Evidence.
@pauledsall5849 Do you know what science is my friend? It's taking something and experimenting with it to prove a theory or supposition. You can't do that with history. You have to take the facts and theorize unless you can take what is know today such as DNA and The laws of the universe in put that in to the differing theories and chose the best belief. now some people want to through a creator away so they choose a theory that does this .. problem is the facts that point in a differing direction so they just belittle those facts so they can live a life with out God the creator because if there is a creator then that changes things you have deal with it!
It isn't speculating, it's logic. We know the dimensions of the arc, we know the size of dinosaurs. Therefore under the argument dinosaurs were included on the arc, they had to be small enough.
Honest question here. I’m a Christian who has been sort of agnostic about the age of the earth and theistic evolution vs plain reading creation. How can we answer how carnivores survived after the flood with such low prey numbers? When you bring up that dinosaurs must have been on the ark, that’s the first question I had… what did the the carnivores eat when they landed? I’m hope to learning more, but at face value it seems unlikely that God would expect them to survive post-flood with no food to eat (or only enough for one meal, or a few- each resulting in a different species going extinct.) Dinosaurs aside, I have the same question for other large carnivores which are still alive today. Wouldn’t the lions have starved before more gazelles could be born to feed them without making the prey species extinct? I ask earnestly. Please enlighten me! Obviously with God all things are possible and he could have essentially frozen all of their metabolisms for however long it took or something, but I’m curious how this can be explained otherwise?
Great questions: as an atheist I don’t believe they have answers (real answers) so I can’t give you any. But I can say that I’ve never actually thought about that first point and I commend you for thinking of that
@@gooseyj9390 thanks for the kind words :). Not to be a Bible thumper, and I know I’m not gonna make a convert out of you from a UA-cam comment, but for what it’s worth: don’t let a literal reading the book of Genesis be the reason you don’t find God. Most of the historicity research I’ve done has been on the new testament which is actually incredibly reliable. I haven’t found anything that makes me think anything in the Old Testament is “false” either, but there are ways of interpreting Genesis which are easier to line up with mainstream science (and some good textual reasons to interpret that way). If you’re ever interested to discuss any of these topics, feel free to reach out! I don’t have all the answers, but I’m happy to help if I can.
It's not stated yet we know that an ice age took place after the flood and the baby dino's might have died off during this time, We do know that the existed there remains have been found in sediment that quickly covered them and we know that it wasn't to many years because we are finding flesh now.
The Book of Enoch, if you've read it, you'd know it also tries to predict and explain how the planets, Earth, Sun and Moon move... and it got everything wrong. It's author just made things up, and we know that for certain, unless God just gave them all the wrong information. It's a very fascinating book, and gives us a glimpse into how people believed things about astronomy and our own planet, and how absolutely wrong they were. Yet they wrote it down as if it was Godly wisdom, when most likely its author was just mentally disturbed, and very imaginative.
@SkyDriver to be fair though if that is your argument, most of humanity believed the earth was the center of the universe until 1543 when copernicus proved otherwise. Then still it wasn't accepted as truth until a century later. I wouldnt say the writer was mentally ill, but ill informed. The stuff about the nephilims makes sense especially since all ancient cultures tell tales of giants.
Dr. Mitchell quotes Stephen Jay Gould. I invite everyone to read Stephen Jay Gould. He was a paleontologist at Harvard, writing 300 essays for Natural History magazine. Many of those essays are collected into books, and are very easy for the average citizen to read and understand. He passed on a while back, so he can't speak to this use of his words, but I can tell you that he was unalterably opposed to creationism, testified against it in courts, This is what he said about creationists that cherry-picked quotes from his work: "It is infuriating to be quoted again and again by creationists-whether through design or stupidity, I do not know-as admitting that the fossil record includes no transitional forms. Transitional forms are generally lacking at the species level but are abundant between larger groups. The evolution from reptiles to mammals . . . is well documented." Still, creationists can't help themselves apparently, and continue to cherry pick his work for quotes they can use. My suggestion is to for people to read his work. It is readily available.
In my opinion as a man of God is that all the dinosaur bones that have been found needed to be dug up that means something covered them up. Wouldn't a long period of time under water cause sediment to settle on top of animals that have drowned?.
@@lynnthomas7287 that’s actually not true. The sedimentary rock in the earth is evidence of a massive flow of water covering the earth at one point. You should look into this.
Most fossils are indeed found in sedimentary rocks - most others kinds of rock would destroy the fossil. However, not all sedimentary rocks form in water - there are some beautifully preserved fossils formed in volcanic ash deposits. However, I think you are trying to convince yourself that fossils are evidence of a global flood, which they are not. Fossils vary greatly in age and distribution and testify to the great age of the Earth and provide evidence of evolution, not creationism/ Noah's flood etc. To contend you original point, many fossils do form in water borne sediment.....how long to you imagine it takes for an animal to be covered in sediment, that sediment to be covered over, by many hundreds or thousands of meters of sediment, to be compressed, chemically changed form organic to inorganic material, for this sediment to be uplifted (there are fossils on Everest for instance, from the bottom of the Tethys Ocean no less) and weathered away to be revealed? A few thousand years or many millions? Answers please on a postcard....
@@roydodds3693 Evidence 1: Fossils of sea creatures high above sea level due to the ocean waters having flooded over the continents We find fossils of sea creatures in rock layers that cover all the continents. For example, most of the rock layers in the walls of Grand Canyon (more than a mile above sea level) contain marine fossils. Fossilized shellfish are even found in the Himalayas. Evidence 2: Rapid burial of plants and animals We find extensive fossil “graveyards” and exquisitely preserved fossils. For example, billions of nautiloid fossils are found in a layer within the Redwall Limestone of Grand Canyon. This layer was deposited catastrophically by a massive flow of sediment (mostly lime sand). The chalk and coal beds of Europe and the United States, and the fish, ichthyosaurs, insects, and other fossils all around the world, testify of catastrophic destruction and burial. Evidence 3: Rapidly deposited sediment layers spread across vast areas We find rock layers that can be traced all the way across continents-even between continents-and physical features in those strata indicate they were deposited rapidly. For example, the Tapeats Sandstone and Redwall Limestone of Grand Canyon can be traced across the entire United States, up into Canada, and even across the Atlantic Ocean to England. The chalk beds of England (the white cliffs of Dover) can be traced across Europe into the Middle East and are also found in the Midwest of the United States and in Western Australia. Inclined (sloping) layers within the Coconino Sandstone of Grand Canyon are testimony to 10,000 cubic miles of sand being deposited by huge water currents within days. Evidence 4: Sediment transported long distances We find that the sediments in those widespread, rapidly deposited rock layers had to be eroded from distant sources and carried long distances by fast-moving water. For example, the sand for the Coconino Sandstone of Grand Canyon (Arizona) had to be eroded and transported from the northern portion of what is now the United States and Canada. Furthermore, water current indicators (such as ripple marks) preserved in rock layers show that for “300 million years” water currents were consistently flowing from northeast to southwest across all of North and South America, which, of course, is only possible over weeks during a global Flood. Evidence 5: Rapid or no erosion between strata We find evidence of rapid erosion, or even of no erosion, between rock layers. Flat, knife-edge boundaries between rock layers indicate continuous deposition of one layer after another, with no time for erosion. For example, there is no evidence of any “missing” millions of years (of erosion) in the flat boundary between two well-known layers of Grand Canyon-the Coconino Sandstone and the Hermit Formation. Another impressive example of flat boundaries at Grand Canyon is the Redwall Limestone and the strata beneath it. Evidence 6: Many strata laid down in rapid succession Rocks do not normally bend; they break because they are hard and brittle. But in many places we find whole sequences of strata that were bent without fracturing, indicating that all the rock layers were rapidly deposited and folded while still wet and pliable before final hardening. For example, the Tapeats Sandstone in Grand Canyon is folded at a right angle (90°) without evidence of breaking. Yet this folding could only have occurred after the rest of the layers had been deposited, supposedly over “480 million years,” while the Tapeats Sandstone remained wet and pliable. I know you said you wanted it on a post card which meant short and not explained fully. There are many more things the bible that have found to be true over the years and will continue to be proven by atheist scientists. Have a blessed week.
You would only need 2 of the dinosaur kind and they could (probably would) be young and small enough to fit. They would not have to get the largest ones on the ark, therefor the largest Dino’s would have died in the flood with everything else.
The arc was obviously a TARDIS with a much larger volume inside. It explains Noah's age and his ability to gather the over 5 million species we estimate to exist and. It also explains his magical staff that parted the red sea and
It's quite simple, 7 days in God's time is different to 7 days in human time. People who have NDE's always say that time feels different on the other side. One day could be billions of years or more. This always made a lot of sense to me
@user-fc7hh2ie4k well yes, but that is if you are living and trying to communicate with the dead. But that's very different to what we're talking about here. Regardless I can't believe you hypocrites, shame on you. People actually say outright that Heaven and God exists and you turn yourselves into knots trying to disprove them
@@hihosh1 The plain truth of the statement in Ecclesiastes 9:5 has nothing to do with the living attempting to contact the dead, it means exactly what it says. The dead don't know anything. Psalms 146:4 says the same thing "His spirit goes out, he returns to the ground; On that very day his thoughts perish." Ecclesiastes 9:6 goes even further "Also, their love and their hate and their jealousy have already perished, and they no longer have any share in what is done under the sun." Love and hate are emotions on opposite ends of the spectrum, so not only are the dead incapable of thought but feelings as well. This truth Biblically eliminates the possibility of any afterlife. Shame? Is that what you said, shame? For understanding and spreading what God has inspired? No, I am the opposite of ashamed. Belief in God and his written word is exactly why this truth is so important. The lie about what happens to the dead has caused more suffering and wasted more time around the world than any other. Whole cultures obsessed with pleasing dead relatives or spending what little they have on lavish ceremonies for the dead. Or God dishonoring practices like Halloween. All because they believe a lie that is not taught in the Bible. A lie started by Satan when he told Eve "you positively will not die". Belief in an afterlife is in no way required to believe in God, in fact to please him it is key to listen to his inspired word. Merely professing belief in God while ignoring what he wrote, that would be hypocritical. This is also no denial of heaven, those with the heavenly hope are resurrected (restored to life by God), there are no dead in heaven they are very much alive. Please don't listen to people who dream or hallucinate or lie for book sales. Listen to God's word.
@user-fc7hh2ie4k I'm sorry you can't grasp the fact that you, the soul, don't die. Those in Heaven are alive, so when these people meet their loved ones, they are meeting their living souls in Heaven. If you can't understand that then I pity you
Is there sound explanation for dinosaurs , large meteorites impacts , wandering stars ( planets ) galaxies, nebula, supernovas , any clear explanation for that in the biblical text??
2:30 "I've got twelve years of college. I've got six letters after my name. I do not make guesses. I make educated guesses." I've never seen more obvious jealousy of academia and intellectual pursuit in my entire life. These people DESPISE you if you use your brain to any degree that makes their entire worldview collapse. I mean, I don't blame them--if I felt threatened to the degree that evolution threatens Creationist beliefs, I'd attack it this obsessively and insecurely too.
I enjoyed this presentation. As a more mature adult, I can recall numerous things that turned out to be wrong, but were scientific consensus. Quite a few in just my lifetime.
@Brad: You've been brainwashed into thinking that science explains everything, when it doesn't nowhere NEAR to. Science has become your 'god'. There's only ONE TRUE God and HE IS to be praised FOREVER AND EVER and His name IS JESUS, not 'Professor'.
@@glenturney4750 Science explains what it can. I'm sure you believe and trust science, as long as it doesn't conflict with your religious beliefs. That's just bias, though. All science is the same. It's the gathering and studying of all evidence, the formulation of ideas, the testing of hypotheses, and the submission of findings so they can be tested and scrutinized by others. When other scientists also test the hypotheses, reach the same findings, and cannot debunk the findings, they are accepted as theory, which is the same thing as meaning "The findings work, they're consistent and correct." This applies to everything. It's the same science that led to the understanding of geology, biology, medicine, technology, and everything else scientific. The thing about creation science, is that it skips every step required to be science. Creation science skips the accumulation and study of all evidence. It only accepts evidence it likes. Creation science skips the formulation ideas and testing hypotheses. It also skips the absolutely crucial step of submitting their findings for peer review to be tested and scrutinized by others. It's absolutely not science at all. Creation science is nothing more than an institutionalized factory of confirmation bias. It's never produced anything, and it's assertions are not consistent, tested or even verifiable. It checks every single box for 'NOT' science. Creation science and everything they say can be summed up with a single word. "Apologetics". And it does it very badly.
@@extraSNUFFY: OH, so you don't like anybody warning you when you're doing something wrong? Is that what the apostles did when they wrote the Bible, (God's Word)? They were "judging" people? 'WARNING' somebody when they're on the wrong track ISN'T judging them, it's trying to educate them BEFORE something bad happens due to their going down the wrong track, BECAUSE I DO CARE. It's my hope that they WILL heed the warning and WAKE UP before it's too late. John the Baptist warned King herod about him taking his brother's wife for himself, WHILE his brother was still alive. That's called, 'adultery'.. Was John "JUDGING" king herod, or 'WARNING' him of coming judgement? He was 'WARNING' herod. GOD is the One Judge. HE decides who goes to hell, not me. I just know that the Bible explains what will happen to those who commit certain sins and try to educate them of their errors, before it's too late.
I was taught about the age of the Earth and about the dinosaurs in school, and so it was confusing to me when I first became a Christian and my church was trying to lump all of human history into 10,000 years. I prefer to be in awe of God and the abundance of new, complex, scientific discoveries being made, such as finding new dinosaur fossils every day. Just as God is complex, His creation is also complex.
@@CaptainFantastic222 : All true science is in complete agreement with the word of God. The problem is people who make videos like this one have never actually studied the Bible for themselves. When they cannot reconcile certain historical events, due to their lack of wisdom, knowledge., and understanding, they simply make stuff up. Sort of like a bad detective who makes the crime fit their theory instead of making the evidence prove the crime.
@@wrongfullyaccused7139 dude what you just said is 100% wrong no scientific field supports the Bible. And I challenge you to give me a scientist who clearly shows support for the Bible with true data. And don't give me one of your answers in geniuses clowns. Because they don't do true science. Or any other creationist " scientist". True unbiased scientific results points to evolution, old earth. and not a biblical God that the very word of that monster was written by bigoted superstitious savages. You need to have evidence before you claim something.
If you look 👀 at the dna evidence, mankind has been on the earth only 6,000 years, which proves the Bible timeline. If that is established, then the rest of the timeline is established! If you are have a conflict between your science and the Bible, re-examine the basis of your science. Every day more accepted “ truths and facts” of science are being proven wrong! Most of what we call science is actually religion, based on faith, not facts.
@@glenparker234 : Completely false and in direct contradiction of scripture. So sorry someone tore out the book of Isaiah from your Bible. That assumes you own a bible though.
In that film he believes that creature died 4300 years ago in the flood, why didn't Noah save 2 of them as well? You can't just use portions of the book to justify what you say all of it must work or none of out does.
Comedian Lewis Black talked about performing in the bible belt of America. The subject of fossils came up. A guy told Black; "Fossils, Mr. Black, are the handywork of the Devil".
@@isaiah4099 Adam was not the man It was Noah and yes God talks to people even today. Maybe not in the way you are thinking yet it does happen. and T Rex's on the ark ( not a cart) yes ... now if your going to say full grown... no !
@@ScalpNinjaTrader No it isn't. There was no worldwide flood, the Earth and plants on it weren't made before the sun and other stars, the True God isn't the sick monster that ordered the killing of every man, woman and child in Jericho (and the Sun didn't stop in the sky while it happened either)
@@MrHominid2U Your feelings or opinion doesn't change the Bible or who God is. Maybe read the whole story before calling The Desire of the Nations a sick monster.
Great vid :) BUT The shark thing with the seaweed ! As someone that is a shark guy ! And lead shark dives a good chunk of my life and has about 15k dives I have a wheee bit of experience with them Its a test bite what that shark was doing its purely testing what it is that is NOT a shark eating or attacking that seaweed especially the way its moving This is like throwing a tennis ball for your dog and saying WOW its attacking that tennis ball dogs must love to eat tennis balls Sadly this is “modern” science lets make a scenario where we can make something work for what we want as results I can say using that same idiocy they love to eat anchors and buckets and line and metal chain dive suits and old tires and dive tanks and …. Sharks are curious and have no arms or hands so they use their teeth to sense what it is
The shark took a bite of the kelp and then came back for a larger bite...that was self evident from the video. Particularly since there were other delicacies in the water ...releasing blood.
Also , there's a good chance that the guy that handled the tuna and the squid had blood all over the kelp when he threw it in the water. So the cap may have smelled like a meat meal.
@@randybonner9870 That would not explain why the shark did not go for those delicacies the first time or why he went back to the kelp on the second pass...bypassing the delicacies for the second time.
I find it awfully convenient that he left off what the shark researchers said happened after the test was all done. I'm betting the shark spit it out but they don't show that. You can't say from this video that sharks are plant eaters because he took the kelp; we don't see what it did with it. For all we know it could have left the scene and used it to bait larger fish or something.
The sin has been committed. You should seek knowledge but it doesn’t take away the fact that the more advanced we become the more we destroy ourselves and the Earth itself. Blessing and a Curse
Exactly ..... "need to separate what we know from what we assume" it is called the evolution theory but schools, scientists, etc teach darwinian evolution as though it is actual fact for it happening the way they claim it happened
You know gravity, mathematics and physics are just theories that exists in our minds???? But they do exist and we can prove their existence. Your God or heaven is like the idea of Thor, unicorns, vampires, flat earth... You're just imagination.
The science of adaption and mutation is used to push speciation.The finch beak will slap and mutate.. But it will be a finch till it's extinction ... Too think it will change to a different species is so unscientific!
@@ryant3600 so you call your deity Yahweh??? Then it will be interesting to see you in front of a jackal like Anubis and then saying, i want expecting this..
6:58 Yes, it looks like the cedar tree that you would find where the story of Job takes place. Also, the part of animals always reproducing their own kind. Evolution doesn't teach a fish that gives birth to a salamander. It's small changes that start in the DNA. Which through mutation can slowly or sometimes fast(after extinction level events or environmental pressures)start to drift away from the parental animal and if keeps going without the animal going extinct. New species can occur. Look at the two sqeaurls at the Grand Canyon. Or after when the non-avian dinosaur went extinct. Never in the history in the universe did an animal give birth to another animal that wasn't its parent species. You are misleading people, and that's shameful.
There was no denial that speciation occurs. And he never said that one species of animal gave birth to a different one. What he said is we have no proof of a single ancestral dinosaur through fossils, just that we have evidence of multiple different dinosaurs. And they do reproduce to their own kind the ancestral dog could reproduce other animals like it. And we know it doesn't take long for diversification to occur, chickens in particular only need a couple generations. There is no undeniable proof, however, that every living thing came from one ancestor, let alone a chemical soup. We assume because of DNA similarities. He's not misleading anyone, but presenting a Creationist's case for dinosaurs, the only place where there could be a fault is how old the dinos were on the ark. Under his model this isn't misleading anyone.
@@soul-heart there is evidence of ancestors! only lok at the "indoyus" , how do you explain our modern whaleshare part of their genetic code with the fossils of such land-dwelling animals?
LOLLLL! "we know this chart is very scientific. how do we know this is scientific? because it has a bunch of scientific words on it!" LOLLLLLLLLL! can't! 😂
Why do biblical scholars deny Darwinian’s Theory of Evolution but are more then happy accepting the Heliocentric Model eg, Special and General Relativity when God said the following. Psalm 104:5 He set the earth on its foundations, so that it should never be moved. Chronicles 16:30 Tremble before him, all the earth; yes, the world is established; it shall never be moved. Isaiah 40:22 It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in; Does this not indicate a flat circular stationary Earth? I just don’t understand this acceptance of an infinite universe with dark matter, dark energy etc. God made no mention of these things.Also God said he made two great lights. The sun and the moon to rule the day and to rule the night. Therefore, the moon is also a light not a planetoid that one can land upon as NASA claims. Now I don’t care what the church says. I just know what God said. So I ask are you paying attention, or are you promoting misinformation? I believe a reply to my comment is required.
The earths a snow globe but fixed so firmly only god can shake it to make it snow but he can only be bothered in the winter. Oh I forgot we don't have seasons because of the unmoveable earth.
@@truthgiver8286 Please allow me to take a moment to be immensely scientific given my understanding of Physics and Applied Mathematics. Einstein’s relativity is a magnificent mathematical grab which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to there underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple who ignorant people take for a king. It’s exponents are brilliant men but they are meta physicist rather than scientists. I hope that was not overly academically for you.
your scientists made their jargon. God made the universe and it's laws. Evolution has been disproved and was never proved. Flat earth has been disproved by pictures and a test involving the horizon. It was years ago I saw that. You don't really need an answer you need a reality check. Also the moon only reflects the sun's light. The bible is God's word not the Church's word.
@@rockroll9761 Did you read my entire comment and comprehend what those sections of the Bible say? What do you mean it doesn’t say that? Ok what do those sections of the Bible that I quoted say then? Or do you just believe in science? Now answer all 4 of my questions without giving me a childish reply.
@@davidmuth4571 lol when that individual said that dinosaurs were made up, I started laughing… if that’s the case, how can you dig up evidence ? Lol the bones Are the evidence!
I'm a Christian and I believe in the Bible. But I also believe in science. And science tells us that humans and dinosaurs never existed at the same time. We also know from studying ancient cultures that calendars were different. Why do we believe that in the beginning of time a day was the same as it is in modern times? Keep in mind that the Bible is written metaphorically. And was also translated several times over the years.
The change in the atmosphere post flood was definitely conducive to smaller creatures, including the descendants of dinosaurs. 💁♀️ The largest air breathing creatures on earth live in water and must be incredibly efficient, considering the time they can hold one breath.
What about him telling that according to the Bible the Earth existing BEFORE the SUN??? Yes the Earth is flat n the Sun n Moon rotate horizontally around it
@Chandller Burse well clearly water was invented first before anything else really eehhh maybe the third thing. It existed before light. In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
@Chandller Burse earth was never flat, I just find it interesting that water existed before light. flat earth is just a jewish psyopes designed to make christians look stupid.
But the question of how Christians, which I am, should feel about dinosaurs, is truly trivial. The priorities should be three-fold: working out our salvation, witnessing for Christ, and preaching the cross. The rest of it is good knowledge but insignificant. I have always said and will continue to do so: You can be saved without the Old Testament but not without the New. The former merely helps you understand latter better.
Actually, Jesus was in the Old Testament, too. Gen 1:26, Micah 5:2, Isaiah 7:14, Daniel 7:13-14, just to name a few. So for me the Old is just as important as the New.
@@eltorro9411 important, yes, but not vital for salvation. And what just came to mind is the transfiguration. If you recall, Peter was putting Moses and Elijah (both Old Testament figures) on the same level as Christ. God said hear Jesus. This is not a slight upon those two men just clarifying. And we can do this all day, but the Old Testament is not more important than the New. The former only helps us understand the latter. It's a foreshadow but Moses, Elijah, and the rest of the Old Testament saints won't get you into the Kingdom of God. That's the bottom line. Lastly, as Jesus said in John: You search the scriptures- the Old Testament- and in them you think that you have eternal life, but they only testified of me. So salvation is not in the Old Testament but in him whom the Old Testament spoke of.
@@eltorro9411 for you it is important and it's okay if you feel that way. Just understand, the blood of sheep and goats (Old Testament again) won't save you. Plus, Old Testament, i.e., the Law won't save you because it's works, and by works shall no flesh be justified in God's sight. That's scripture. Of course, we should strive to keep the commands, but only Jesus can keep them at the level that God requires. We cannot do that and definitely not all the time. You have to keep them externally and internationally. One sinful thought and we are lost if our salvation was based upon us and us alone. It takes the blood of Jesus to justify us
Your opinion is true. And that it also validates that people chooses what they want to believe. But the existence of dinosours just can't be ignored. Because it will prove the historicity of the bible.
I would suggest Listening to people who actually know what they're talking about about dinosaurs This guy's opening statements Are not close to being true
I once had my employer ask ,why wasn't there any mention of dinosaurs in the bible.well I told him because it's a book about God's plan of salvation not a book about dinosaurs or salamanders.
You should have said I haven't read the Bible since the evidence is in it. Read Job 40:15...Read about Behemoth and Leviathan...clearly dinosaurs. By the way, as said in this video the term dinosaur was not coined until the early 1800's. The term dragons is found throughout the Bible as are other terms denoting creatures of that nature.
@@wavesofzen5383 Wha how was that negative I was just saying what I heard from a few yrs back sheesh and if that was sarcasm try 2 b a lil bit more humorous with it lol.
3:45 Fully formed creatures reproducing after their own kind? Offspring are not exact replicas of their parents, and after a really, really long time they eventually turn out completely different.
Like your text books and teachers did for all of your school years. Here is evolution the answer to where we came from and everything came from don't look any further and God aww he is just a myth. I'll take creation over evolution!
Dinosaurs also died out because they had "terrible bad luck", according to the latest study from the University of Edinburgh. the asteroid, due to the consequences of which they became extinct, crashed into the Earth precisely at the time when the giant reptiles were most vulnerable due to rising sea levels and increased volcanic activity.
Hmm and this description of a supposed sauropod dinosaur makes no mention of it's extremely long neck.Odd how the biblical scribe failed to notice that detail.And when it comes to Leviathan I would love see a creation "scientist"explain the physics and chemistry behind underwater fire breathing
@Arely Munoz You're missing the point. Biologically, it is almost entirely impossible for an organism to produce fire from its stomach/mouth on land or in the air, let alone underwater...
The real question is how did a universe just form and life just form. On one side you have nothing in to something no design yet what is formed shows design. On the other side you have a creator with design and forms everything by speaking it in to existence. Hum I choose the latter!
@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice But the "there is at least one god" hypothesis also has "nothing in to something no design", as the god or gods also have to come from somewhere for the comparison to be fair and equal.
@@leftgrrl No God has been and always will be. I know that is hard to take in with our finite lives yet we see creation with design. As far as animals are concerned they do not have a sole they do not know wrong from right just as small children do not know right from wrong small children learn and grow animals do not they have instinct behaviors children grow in knowledge and until they reach the age of accountability are safe and will be taken to heaven yet animals do not have this ability ( not to say we can't teach animals they just don't understand wrong from right). Yet I do believe animals will be in heaven. Now the "big bang" There has to be something to stat with there is no space no partials to collide so where do these things come from in the evolutionary beginning? Yet if there is a creator that has been and always will be that is not a problem.
I have been studying and working in science for 50 years and I have never heard of any but 2 of the theories for dinosaur extinction that he mentioned.
@@Lalo-dh8xq no but I’m saying that working in “science” doesn’t mean that you know everything science or knowledge related He could do anything from biochemistry to Neurology 😂
@@Jurassicalpha266 "True" science. Yea, right. If you don't like the topic, then just move along. Otherwise why are you here? Carrying the torch of secularism and atheism?
@@douglasagriswold6118 because paleontology is true science. Have you ever received in education? Because if you did you would not have typed you're reply. If you believe what this guy is a spouting you belong in a cartoon show.
Oh you are too funny - You say it's "true" because you have bought into the "trueness" of it. I'm sure we're all more educated here than you could even imagine. Yet here you are, attacking like a blind dog, anybody who disagrees with your "worldview". Oh yes, it's "true" because you BELIEVE it to be "true" and you just suck up the secularist science like grape kool-ade. LOL. Maybe you should take Doug's comment and just move along and find somebody else to bleat on and attack. We don't care WHAT you believe. As is the truth, the PAST is gone and all you've done is take the 'pieces' of a wild jigsaw to fit together that makes a case that you won't be responsible for your actions one day. Bye bye!
I imagine it was quite difficult getting pairs of each type of dinosaur 🦕 onto Noah's ark. How did he/she/they stop T Rex from attacking the Bronotosaurs ?
I think the common apologetics say that God calmed the temperaments of animals so attacking each other didn’t occur. Of course that makes about as much sense as humans and dinosaurs living together
There's just one little thing wrong with his analogy about The Flood on sealife, nowhere in Genesis does it say that Noah took sea life aboard the ark, just land animals, creatures. So if by what he says is true about all sealife was buried during The Flood, how did the sealife repopulate the Earth after God made the water recede, seeing as how Noah DIDN'T take any sealife onboard the ark,nor was any provision or accomodations made during construction of the ark to include all sealife on the Earth before The Flood?
@@andrewwhite5176 CD is Very accurate until about 50K years. It's only theist that twist the truth when they keep leaving that last bit of information out.
@@tontonbeber4555 Really it's much harder to believe in evolution the creation .... come on a big bang of nothing to into everything? Really My friend you have a lot more faith then I do if you believe that!
@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice Evolution have been proved a lot of times (even with viruses and their variants ... or maybe you think the covid has been created at the same time of the animals, and just did hide in the ground up to now). Moreover, evolution and creation are not necessary incompatible. I do believe that God created the universe, that means that he created every law of the universe, from speed of light to mass of the neutrino, including evolution of living species. If it's a fact and it works very well, that proves that it's the decision of God (I follow the principle of fine tuning). But of course to admit that, you have also to admit that your books are outdated by the progress that we, the creatures, have made, following the wish of God. So I do believe in God and admire his creation, and I worship him by doing my best to understand what he does, but I absolutely don't use the bible for that purpose.
@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice The Big Bang theory addresses the reason for the expansion of the universe, not it's creation. Good luck with science as you move forward in life.
I have a question? What is the evidence that all animals were created on the 6th day? What is the evidence that all the earth was repopulated by animals from the ark? What is the evidence that snakes talk? U cant just point to the bible and say, "because it says it right here." The requirement of evidence has to work both ways. We cant talk about Genesis "like we have it on video tape." All the answers he gave are based on the divine events of the bible, which we have no evidence of. If we're gunna have this debate we have to be honest about the undisputable facts.
In Africa a host of wild animals die daily. Scavengers make sure that they will never form fossils. There have always been scavengers. To find an intact fossil means something unusual happened
Funny there are no fossils of extant animals like cats, dogs, humans, etc. In the same rock layers as dinosaurs. Predation doesn't explain not one single Dino bone anywhere
Because what he said was a lie? I’ve studied both secular science methods and creationist views. If you’re able to be honest, this actually holds truth and makes sense. But that would mean you have to admit there’s a God and we are in need of a savior. Is that why you choose to mock it?
@@TarantulamanNC There is no 'creationist views' that carries evidence that disagrees with science. And there is no such thing as 'secular' science. Science is just science.
@@rexsterling7346 The researchers who rely on the methodological naturalism, rule out God from scientific research as ”supernatural”, because they have chosen atheism for the basis of their researches. Thus the choice does not happen on scientific grounds but based on the world-view i.e. on a religious standpoint. All scientists believe in something which they choose as the starting point for their researches. The object of faith need not be a deity. It can be whatever worldview -based presumption. Naturalistic science is based on the belief that there is no God, or that God can not influence on the physical world. Naturalism sets its own religious baseline as a criteria for what can be considered science. It dogmatically holds the fallacy that it has the privilege to science. That’s why it does not honestly participate in scientific discussions with those who have a different baseline. This kind of abstinence is against the scientific principle of self-criticism. The evolution theory, favored by atheists, is in its pivotal parts based on imagination where the laws of physics and genetic realities are bypassed and replaced with assumptions. Unlike the natural scientific study which leans on methodological naturalism, creationism is based on critical rationalism which adheres to all principles of science. Critical rationalism sees that absolute objectivity is not possible and that the boundary between natural and supernatural is not in all cases possible to strictly draw. Unlike naturalism, creationism rejects no theory for purely ideological reasons.
All Videos can do that... yet if you study the facts you will find this video of understanding! So what is your belief ... Evolution, no creator? if so Why are there Laws in nature? Explain DNA? If you are an evolutionist tell me how the DNA of a dino changes in to the DNA of a bird? I love to understand this if you could explain it.
@@Validsharky Catholics are Christians who do not believe the hogwash this guy is teaching. They do not believe in a young earth, dinos and humans living together. And they believe in evolution.
If all animals were plant eaters at one time, the herbivores would soon overpopulate the earth, exhaust their food supply, and starve to death in mass. Carnivores are actually necessary to keep a healthy balance.
You’re making an assumption that the herbivores have to reproduce at that point in time. With no death and no disease, the existing herbivores did not need to replenish their numbers and they would have kept living in harmony.
I watched the entire video, but feel his position lost traction at this the 6:18 mark. He reads JOB 40:15-19 which clearly states “he moves his tail like a cedar”. Key word being “moves” Then at 6:18 the speaker states the behemoth “has” a tail like a cedar. So therefore it must be an animal much larger than a hippo or elephant. “Moving his tail like” and “having a tail like” are two entirely different things. The presenter asks at 6:29 “when people read through gods word are they actually paying attention?” I feel the presenter needs to ask himself that same question.
Well science today is so much better. No mental gymnastics today amongst secular scientists: 1. We can't define what a woman is. 2. We are told to believe all women. 3. Men can have babies. 4. There are infinite genders. 5. Abortion is good because a baby in the womb isn't living.
Amazing Dinosaur Facts Origins of the Word Dinosaur Sir Richard Owen What is the origin of the word dinosaur? I ask many people this question and surprisingly most people don't know. One of those little known dinosaur facts is that the word dinosaur is a relatively new word in the English language. The word dinosaur literally means "terrible, powerful, wondrous lizards." The word became popular after biologist and paleontologist, Sir Richard Owen coined the term "Dinosauria" in 1841. The word dinosaur derives from two greek words (deinos) "terrible, powerful, wondrous" + (sauros) "lizard". So what would a person prior to 1841 call a giant, powerful, wondrous lizard if they saw one? The answer to that question is really quite obvious especially if we look back into the historical record for evidence of giant, powerful, wondrous lizards. Can you Guess? Another amazing dinosaur fact is that every culture had names for these giant, powerful, wondrous lizards. Explorers described them, historians wrote about them, and they have been romanticized in many cultures throughout the world. Can you guess yet? Find out the answer! Watch the movie: Forbidden History. So what were dinosaurs called prior to 1841? There are some theories that have been promoted as dinosaur facts. Many people have been taught, as fact, that the dinosaurs died off millions of years ago when a meteor hit the earth, but can this really be proven? Did a meteor really wipe out the dinosaurs? I was taught, along with just about everyone else, the above theory, but there is evidence, a lot of it, that indicates that dinosaurs and man have always existed together. After my own 10 year study of the issue, I am fully convinced that dinosaurs have always existed with man. O.K. enough suspense. The most common English word used to describe terrible, powerful, wondrous lizards was...Dragon. That's right, Dragon. Many other names were used as well. To learn more about this fascinating subject start with the historical evidence. You might be wondering...Were did all of the fossil dinosaurs come from then? There is a simple logical explanation for this as well. Use the hyperlink above to learn what really happened to the dinosaurs or you can Watch the FREE movie: Forbidden History to see more evidence.
Dinosaurs do not at all exist. They are just a propaganda used to support the lie of the big bang theory. They used to be seen as lizards now they are assume chickens even though bone and fossil are 2 different things and noone has ever found a real dinosaur bone and there are literally 0 on display in any museum on earth... It other words they don't exist.
Dinosaurs were yet to be discovered by the time the bible was written by humans. That’s the most logical explanation why there’s no mention of dinosaurs in the bible. People didn’t know any better back then.
@@voodoodiecast dinosaurs were never discovered because they aren't real. If dinosaurs where real that would mean evolution is real. If evolution was real all animals would be homogenous because the animal at the top of the food chain is the food chain. That means either everyone would be dinosaurs or all animals would be flying humans with gills. Neither exist now which show evolution is fake. As the bible shows we were not here for millions of years which means dinos couldn't have existed. Besides that fake fossils and bones are different. Bones decay ess than hundreds of years, and fossils are just imprints basically moldings as all the dinosaurs skeleton on display are all made of plaster casting. There are no real dinosaur bones. It's all a lie.
My dear, dragons in every culture were beings who fly! If man and dinosaurs co-exist, then where is the event that dinosaurs attacked human beings or any being tamed in any actual historical events??
@@sereanaduwai8313 none. God killed the dinosaurs for their sins! Then again, if that is the case then god also enjoyed being sodomized by Nurgle in 2020
@Jouni Suninen it's fossilized through mineralization. It degrades instantly when we extract it. Once again you are proving you know nothing about science. Go back to school. I received an education why do I have to educate you? And don't get you're information from Dr. Mary swieitzer. Because she said evolution is still true
Yes the very basis of faith is belief without evidence. 1st mistake is asking a preacher about dinosaurs, 2nd mistake is this man saying he makes “educated” guesses.
Indeed, Behemoth of the version says so! It's one of them big badass tree top eaters with a tale the size of a ceder tree! Behemoth means greatest of creatures!
Kelp aren't plants they're algae. In any event the samples were dropped into the ocean within seconds of each other and I'd argue the smell of the tuna and squid inodiated everywhere and the kelp was the largest with parts moving around in the water current. If you showed the rest of the video the shark ate the tuna and squid. I'm not sure what point you're making here but sharks have been found with parts of buoys in their stomachs among other weird things. A whole lot of time spent on a point of nonsense.
Nope, the shark had ample choice between the kelp and other delicacies and chose the Kelp twice forgoing the other delicacies. Believe your lying eyes on this one.
Did it let u know the TRUTH about the Earth existing BEFORE the SUN according to the Bible. Yes the Earth is flat n the Sun n Moon rotate horizontally around it.
Vickie. I’d like to recommend another program that is also interesting and also answers a lot of questions about dinosaurs. It is similar to this video in terms of historical and scientific accuracy. It’s called, “The Flintstones.”
I've been to the Ark exhibit. It is massive... that's an understatement. The engineering is stupifying and gives a visual experience as to how complex it was and how everything was laid out. Veterans get in free on Veterans Day. No matter what your personal beliefs may be, it is truly amazing to see and I would encourage everyone to go see it.
How do you know how the ark was laid out ? Did anyone find the plans ? Did anyone find the ark ? Extraordinaire Claims Require Extraordinaire Evidence…. Where is the evidence ?…..there is none, it’s just a fairytale..
Forget the topic..do u realize that the Bible has the Earth existing BEFORE the SUN.????? So why do they say that the Sun was in existence b4 every planet 😊??? Lie..thé Earth is flat n the Sun n Moon rotate horizontally around it.
Why would I waste my time and money on an unture, uneducational experience. Money better spent for Disney Land, at this their stories are somewhat believable.
@chandllerburse737 The problem with this Ark is it proves its impossible for it to ever existed because they had to add things to get it survivable for human occupation. The Bible is full of falsehoods and in essence it just breaks down to being a doomsday cult waiting for the end of the word. Did I hear a trumpet? Is god coming? Oh wait it's just a marching band.
@Chandller Burse Its purpose wasnt to bring people to Christ, its purpose was for further education for people who are already saved. It wasnt to expand the audiance but to entertain the existing one. And well duh, it would jab at evolutionary beliefs. They are designed with the intent at man's attempt to over throw God as the supreme creator with chance and probability
Wow this was very fascinating and intriguing! Since I was a kid I was always obsessed with dinosaurs and such. My first dream was to be a paleontologist. Oh and my favorite dinosaur has always been hands down the Stegosaurus. (I've always been that different kid that wanted to stand out. lol) That particular dinosaur always intrigued me as to how he looked. Especially with the armor plates on his back and the knives on his tail. So cool! And my theory was the extinction was caused by the major change in the climate after the flood. The Earth was just to drastically changed to where they couldn't survive and eventually they died off. God Bless!
I suggest you read science books if you’re interested in the dinosaurs. Religious books come to a conclusion first and then try and bend the facts into their presupposed conclusions. Science doesn’t give a monkeys about whether it fits into religious books, it just follows the evidence.
Also, if it was because of a flood, then the water levels would have only risen, not swept sea shells from the ocean, hundreds of miles inland into Arizona, nor would living muscles have traveled hundreds of miles to reach Arizona, during the fairly short time of the flood. The belief shells made it hundreds of miles just because waters rose, requires the absence of logic, reason and education.
How did the Kangaroos, wombats, etc., get from Australia to the Ark then back to Australia again? Why only marsupials in Australia which evolved first and before the continent split from Pangea?
the details are irrelevant. the more important question is what do you have to show for the validation of atheism as it's done nothing but breed weakness since it's existed? we're supposed to believe a fake book built everything but the truth is impotent?
@@TheGovernmentputcrackinmyblunt What details are irrelevant? The detail that the South Pacific has never been wadable? Who's talking about atheism? What fake book are you talking about? What truth is impotent?
@@MrHominid2U minor details don't matter to omnipotence. if you were correct you would have been strong historically, atheists cannot possibly be so inferior that they can be right about the nature of existence and still be utterly embarrassed since time existed by those with false beliefs. you guys literally complain about having to work in a capitalist society and have no spiritual drive to face evil. I take pretty much nothing you guys say seriously because every other marker of integrity really doesn't exist in structure of physique, face, soul. you say words that you think are objective but any time you go into a competitive arena like combat, art, building and maintaining nations you literally always lose under the smallest of pressures. that weakness comes entirely from your worldview and inability to let god use you to act which denotes your body isn't designed in his image in form or function which is why athiests tell bad stories, don't move well like a human, and come up with rationalizations why these are points of evolution and not willingly making yourself far from perfection.
So, I assume, that when he says he's got 6 letters behind his name, and that implies he has a some sort of doctorate. In what? Theology doesn't count, because that's like having a doctorate in fairytales.
Have you received a Doctorate? Why do you feel you have to belittle someone to whom you disagree with? Just debate the facts. have a open mind to learn. of course if you have a closed mind and don't want to know or learn something then I fully understand your name calling because you are ignorant.
The fact that this should even be a controversial title/topic for Christians tells you there is something wrong with people..
(I’m Christian and dinosaurs, aliens and their existence doesn’t bother me, animals inhabiting this world or others doesn’t dissuade a belief if you truly understand it)
Agreed, it’s possible to interpret and incorporate scientific discoveries into a Christian worldview. Do you happen to have any recommendations for understanding aliens through a Christian framework?
Aliens are mythical…
@@Programm4r 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@Programm4r You mean that they dont visit us? Or are you conceited enough to believe that in a known universe that contains some 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 suns, that other sapient being dont exist??
@@archimedesmaid3602 this isn’t star wars. You have all resources right here on earth for life to exist and it can’t be created. Everything on aliens has so far been debunked.
A panda walked into a diner. Eats, shoots, and leaves. Vicious killer. Lol.
I'm batman give me a strawberry
Hence why proper grammar is important. 😅
AHAHAHA!!! That is great 😄👍
Panda Express?
@@jamesvaughn7389 yep
Really happy this has popped into my feed.
As an open ignorant disbeliever of god for my own personal reasons, this has really shed some light on questions I’ve had for 30 years. I will take this as a learning and humble myself back to the bible for a read.
Thank you sir.
In Dec.1959 a Christian minister got into the Pentagon, with the help of a Christian woman who worked there & met with a benevolent handsome humanlike e.t. being interacting there 3 years & this was the start of nearly 50 years of contact with this being & others with him. Book Stranger At The Pentagon 1967, 72, 91, by Dr. Frank E. Stranges (1927-2008). This e.t. being testified of the God & Jesus Christ of the Bible & told Dr. Stranges that he & they were in an unbroken communion & fellowship with God & Jesus Christ & the universe is filled with e.t. life that did not fall with satan.
@@RonSafreed hmm
@@diabolicaldoodle, this Frank Stranges (1927-2008), when he was in Bible college, he had a fellow student who was a fighter pilot in the Army Air Force during WW 2. He said that he & his fellow squadron fighter pilots during combat missions had their aircraft buzzed by ufos. They tried to tell the higher command but they did not believe them & this got Frank Stranges interested & he started to study ufos & in 1959 he wrote a book Flying Saucerama & in 1963 another book The Truth & Facts on UFOS & E.T.s. This being came to earth 3-16-1957 & the ufo/starcraft landed 14 miles from the Pentagon in a cornfield & the story of what happened afterwards is in the book. Dr. Stranges even went on their ufo/starcraft & ate alien dinners & even slept like overnight. These beings were like handsome young men & the females were like beautiful young women. According to Frank they were human like us even having a waterless shower & an alien advanced toilet on their starcraft, but were also 5th dimensional supernatural beings with mental telepathy!! Unlike the greys, reptilians, tall whites ect, these are the malnevolent ones & they want to enslave humans & worse eat humans! These alien abductions are an evil against humans! BTW the missle that hit the Pentagon (9-11-2001), hit the lodging room this being & others were staying those 3 years of 1957-1960! This according to Dr. Stranges in a video of him speaking in 2007, a year before he died in 2008 at age 81! I can say a lot more but I leave you with this for now. God bless & thank you for your response!!
😂😂😂😂😂
Neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.”
- Romans 8:39
Considering I literally found the intact jaw bone of an Allosaurus in 2009 while hiking in Colorado, I can confirm they were here at some point haha.
You found a bone so you know for sure. Got it
@@bitty_beastly47 yeah, so there is not really any other logical explanation for finding the bone of an extinct species other than it existed at one point. Bones don't just form out of mid air. What point were you trying to make haha
@Gameswithajump how did you come to find it was the bone of a dinosaur?
@@bitty_beastly47 I had it verified and I gave it to the Rocky Mountain Dinosaur Resource Center in 2009 because the state of Colorado would not let me keep it because I found it in a state park. It's still on display there as far as I know. So yeah, pretty sure it was real haha
@@Theultrazombiekiller taking bones to a dinosaur research center is like asking a black man what they think of the n word. The answer will SHOCK you. When you're a hammer, all you see are nails
Job 40:15 Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox. 16 Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly. 17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together. 18 His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron. 19 He is the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach unto him.
Clearly a description of Apato/Brontosaurus Evolution is a lie of Evolutionists. Darwin & Huxleywanted to discredit the Bible.
What does that prove 🤦
@@jesusmylordhegaveitall1324 that God made dinosaurs
@@zaxu No, it doesn't. How does that logical prove anything? Do you even know what the word behemoth means?
@@jesusmylordhegaveitall1324 what do you think he’s talking abouy
So this guy says something like "this chart is scientific why? because it has scientific words on it." But notice what he does around 1:20. He talks about a dinosaur creature merely existing along and all of a sudden, "poof !" You have a mutated offspring. Talk about language manipulation. "Poof" implies that it happened suddenly, whereas anyone who knows evolution knows that it happens because of tiny variations over LONG periods of time. There is no "poof" but he dismisses the idea of natural selection by using words this way, which is precisely what he accuses the authors of the chart of doing.
Question about your evolution: Where did the information come from to move the changes in an up ward direction. DNA, You can lose information yet to gain it you have to have someone or thing outside the evolutionary process to add it. just asking?
@@BrianJonesOneClearChoicesolid question.
Prove to me that dino's over time mutated in to other creatures! You can't because it didn't happen. DNA disproves the evolutionary theory! Beside we see Mutants today and every time it is a downward direction not to improve the creature or person or plant. It weaken and causes other negative issues. show me one creature that has mutated in to a higher form? you can't it doesn't happen! Explain to me how dino's who are reptilians became birds ? it never happened it could not happen! DNA would not allow it to happen!
I was just talkin about this to my husband this morning before he left for work. I am a born again Christian, I was asking so many questions. The topic of dinosaurs came up and I said to him if dinosaurs were real why aren't they in the Bible? Then out of nowhere I went onto UA-cam and this video was the first one in my feed! This truly cleared up all those questions for me. Talk about a sign from God.. praise you Lord Jesus Christ. Thank you
What is the Bible to you? If dinosaurs were mentioned in the Bible. How would that help you in your life? Would the Bible be more credible to you? please don't take these questions personally. Oh! does Genesis tell you how long day 1 or 2 were? or how old is the earth?
I remember having this same discussion with my mother and our pastor when I was a kid, I loved dinosaurs and my mother would say they not in the Bible so they didn't really exist and for me I'm at the museum like they right here so we know they existed. Then it hit me, we as humans are the most educated arrogant creatures ever, I said mom, when God created the heaven and the earth in 7 days, who said 7 days was 24 hrs each? To God 7 days could ver easy be 7 millennium, and then she conceded. Now I don't agree with everything he is saying as far as the dinosaurs died in Noah's flood because no human existed in the same period of time as dinosaurs.
@@ericperry72 I am not looking to change minds just pure discussion on what G'd says, not what I or you think. But one can't not just read the Bible (Old Testament) without the knowledge Hebrew, the Oral Bible and a Bible expert. In the first sentence in Genesis there is a word that has no translation. "et" not eet short e. They are the first and the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet. The first thing G'd created was Language/speech. "And there was evening and there was morning." ONE DAY G'd did not called it FIRST DAY Why? I know there is a lot here. Just think about it Thank you for your time.
@@eliedecastro5716 that's the thing about the Bible, the text can sometimes be hard to interpret correctly and the language is not always written in the most concise way. And this dialogue was welcome.
@@ericperry72Thank you, I hope this doesn't affect the conversation, every time I say that I am a religious Jew, people clime up. I don't try to convince or convert anyone I don't put anyone one down. I just like to discuss what the Bible (Torah) says What G'd has to say. The Bible was written in a Holy language, there is no other one like it. It does not make sense in any other language. If everything was to be explained in the Torah (Bible) you would need a crane to lift the book. This one of the reasons G'd also gave us the Oral Torah. Take Numbers 15:37-41 impossible to know what it is, how to make them,. Each tribe would have different type tzitzis. If you learn it in the original form Oh! you would see thousands of light bulbs coming on in your Thank you for your time
I like how people say, I read the Bible 3 times and I know ....... Without your eyes being opened, the Bible is just a story. That's why it takes dedication and seeking the truth with pure heart, and yes if u r honest with yourself and not just a talker, they will be opened, for u not for u to build yourself up
Do you know how ridiculous that is? Do you realize how many people think the way you do and see almost every passage in the book differently and each one is convicted the Holy Spirit showed them the truth. Stop and think about that.
@@Timmeh_The_tyrant that's why the proof is in your living. And your love for people.
Parts are history, but it's a menagerie of stories, allegories, poems, laws, and interpretations. All being put together by a pagan king in Nicea, with a council of monks, devotees, nomadic tribes, and churches John wrote.
AMEN! A CHANGE OF HEART. 🙂👍
@@Timmeh_The_tyrant: That's weird, 'cause I understood everything he wrote easily enough? Why didn't you? It's not hard if you listen WITH your heart and not your stubborn mind. You gotta let go of 'SELF' and learn to TRUST.
Thank you, that cleared up the cognitive dissonance I had over this... much appreciated!
They couldn't have written about dinosaurs because they didnt have any evidence of them when that fantasy bible book was written
The “cognitive dissonance” you’re referring to is the belief that you should form beliefs based on evidence rather than bronze-age myths.
You’re literally thanking the poster of this vid for assisting you in some odd desire to be irrational.
You’re thanking someone for giving you the ability to continue lying to yourself.
@@skepticalobserver7484 the same people saying Christianity is false and science is king also say men can be women and vice versa. Everyone's got their own religion. Stick to yours and stop bashing others.
@@bigbowlowrong4694 Yes, keep following your 'science'. It will, no doubt, save you in the end. LOL.
I’d probably be dead if I made that mother in law joke 😂
Lol
Or homeless.
The greatest evidence is the Grand Canyon. Study it and experience it. God is real
My biological mother got a cod nuke by spawn killing IRL
What's that have to do with the topic? DUH !
Job 40:17 mentions the tail...why not the extra long neck ? Like in the example pictures you used ? I'm not convinced.
I had the pleasure back in the 80's to hear a great talk by a guy they called Dr dinosaur and he answered so many questions about dinosaurs from the Bible, I loved it
What a coincidence! I also received an education about dinosaurs well over a quarter-century ago. I didn’t see “Dr. Dinosaur,” I learned from two guys named Hanna and Barbera. Like you, I also loved it!
Then I turned 9 and began to become interested in what is actually true.
@Skeptical Observer sounds like you are mad at the Flintstones for lying to you when you were a little kid.
@@flyingfrog7847 nah! There’s nothing wrong with believing in fairy tales.
Unless you’re an adult.
Skeptical Observer Like bones you can walk up to in a museum ? A guy in the comments above actually found a dinosaur bone, and others find teeth and claws on rare occasions.
@@asahmosskmf4639 maybe I’m misunderstanding you or you’re misunderstanding me. Dinosaurs are real. Science is real. People didn’t live at the same time as dinosaurs did.
I’m opposed to people overlooking those facts in favor of unsupported religious BS
He keeps saying “all we need to do is think this through”. Gives example that in the ark, the dinosaurs must have been smaller dinosaurs of reproductive age. The Bible said nothing of this at all, and he is purely speculating…this is the same thing he accuses the scientist of doing (when he was presenting that big chart with yellow and gray lines)
Unlike scientists he never presented it as fact. (Then later change their mind) and offers us to think it through. Science talking about "billions" and "millions of years" is like talking about pigs flying - its possible,like anything else we haven't seen it. How many scientific advices have we seen about basic things like diet - completely changed even over the last 10 years. How many of scientific theories have been totally changed over 200 years....Yet these morons speak of Billions....All science can do is prove what is right under their very nose and observed in its full form -NOTHING ELSE. Yes the bible does say two of each kind of animal able to reproduce, but we don't know when ? Do you also know when a dinosaur can reproduce...Also why are there thousands of paintings ;-Cave and other, of complete dinosaurs in the last 5000 years before modern science even existed. BECAUSE PEOPLE SAW THEM.. THATS WHY.
@pauledsall5849 Yeah because these scientists have been studying for 7 Billion years, right? And they actually saw what happened or took written evidence from those that did .In the meantime we’ll throw away thousands of years of testimony, eye witness reports,from several different cultures that actually saw these things, confirmed them only thousands of years ago..Yeah that makes a-lot more sense to me.. NOT !
We’ll just farm out our faith & trust to Politicians and Scientists Because They Always Tell us the Truth & Never Get it Wrong, And they Never Have Their Own Agendas And Reasons, Neither of Them Have Changed Their Minds Once on Anything of Real Importance & We’ll just Ignore Ancestors and Any Other Direct Witness Evidence.
@pauledsall5849 Do you know what science is my friend? It's taking something and experimenting with it to prove a theory or supposition. You can't do that with history. You have to take the facts and theorize unless you can take what is know today such as DNA and The laws of the universe in put that in to the differing theories and chose the best belief. now some people want to through a creator away so they choose a theory that does this .. problem is the facts that point in a differing direction so they just belittle those facts so they can live a life with out God the creator because if there is a creator then that changes things you have deal with it!
It isn't speculating, it's logic. We know the dimensions of the arc, we know the size of dinosaurs. Therefore under the argument dinosaurs were included on the arc, they had to be small enough.
When the substitute teacher tries to follow the real lesson plan lol
When you try to be a comedian
@@bredwhite6786 when u are a gullible person 😂😂
Honest question here. I’m a Christian who has been sort of agnostic about the age of the earth and theistic evolution vs plain reading creation.
How can we answer how carnivores survived after the flood with such low prey numbers? When you bring up that dinosaurs must have been on the ark, that’s the first question I had… what did the the carnivores eat when they landed? I’m hope to learning more, but at face value it seems unlikely that God would expect them to survive post-flood with no food to eat (or only enough for one meal, or a few- each resulting in a different species going extinct.)
Dinosaurs aside, I have the same question for other large carnivores which are still alive today. Wouldn’t the lions have starved before more gazelles could be born to feed them without making the prey species extinct?
I ask earnestly. Please enlighten me! Obviously with God all things are possible and he could have essentially frozen all of their metabolisms for however long it took or something, but I’m curious how this can be explained otherwise?
Great questions: as an atheist I don’t believe they have answers (real answers) so I can’t give you any. But I can say that I’ve never actually thought about that first point and I commend you for thinking of that
@@gooseyj9390 thanks for the kind words :).
Not to be a Bible thumper, and I know I’m not gonna make a convert out of you from a UA-cam comment, but for what it’s worth: don’t let a literal reading the book of Genesis be the reason you don’t find God. Most of the historicity research I’ve done has been on the new testament which is actually incredibly reliable. I haven’t found anything that makes me think anything in the Old Testament is “false” either, but there are ways of interpreting Genesis which are easier to line up with mainstream science (and some good textual reasons to interpret that way).
If you’re ever interested to discuss any of these topics, feel free to reach out! I don’t have all the answers, but I’m happy to help if I can.
you know he has a good point when he references quotes from 50 years ago🙃
If dinos were on "the ark" where did they go after "the flood" ?
Disneyland!
@@jamesbunch9964 I think a lot of them went to the Sonic Drive-in for a burger, didn't they?
It's not stated yet we know that an ice age took place after the flood and the baby dino's might have died off during this time, We do know that the existed there remains have been found in sediment that quickly covered them and we know that it wasn't to many years because we are finding flesh now.
The ark is just a fable also.
@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice Whaa?? Proofread.
"We're finding FLESH"?? Whoss?
Why would someone believe an anthology of books written 2000+ years ago over modern science? It is ludicrous.
It is explained with the book of Enoch although it's not considered cannon. It pretty much explains any odd beast or creatures on this planet.
The Book of Enoch, if you've read it, you'd know it also tries to predict and explain how the planets, Earth, Sun and Moon move... and it got everything wrong. It's author just made things up, and we know that for certain, unless God just gave them all the wrong information.
It's a very fascinating book, and gives us a glimpse into how people believed things about astronomy and our own planet, and how absolutely wrong they were. Yet they wrote it down as if it was Godly wisdom, when most likely its author was just mentally disturbed, and very imaginative.
@SkyDriver to be fair though if that is your argument, most of humanity believed the earth was the center of the universe until 1543 when copernicus proved otherwise. Then still it wasn't accepted as truth until a century later. I wouldnt say the writer was mentally ill, but ill informed. The stuff about the nephilims makes sense especially since all ancient cultures tell tales of giants.
Dr. Mitchell quotes Stephen Jay Gould. I invite everyone to read Stephen Jay Gould. He was a paleontologist at Harvard, writing 300 essays for Natural History magazine. Many of those essays are collected into books, and are very easy for the average citizen to read and understand. He passed on a while back, so he can't speak to this use of his words, but I can tell you that he was unalterably opposed to creationism, testified against it in courts, This is what he said about creationists that cherry-picked quotes from his work: "It is infuriating to be quoted again and again by creationists-whether through design or stupidity, I do not know-as admitting that the fossil record includes no transitional forms. Transitional forms are generally lacking at the species level but are abundant between larger groups. The evolution from reptiles to mammals . . . is well documented." Still, creationists can't help themselves apparently, and continue to cherry pick his work for quotes they can use. My suggestion is to for people to read his work. It is readily available.
In my opinion as a man of God is that all the dinosaur bones that have been found needed to be dug up that means something covered them up. Wouldn't a long period of time under water cause sediment to settle on top of animals that have drowned?.
No evidence of a global flood.
@@lynnthomas7287 except for the fact that the bones are covered up and they found the ark at the top of a mountain.
@@lynnthomas7287 that’s actually not true. The sedimentary rock in the earth is evidence of a massive flow of water covering the earth at one point. You should look into this.
Most fossils are indeed found in sedimentary rocks - most others kinds of rock would destroy the fossil. However, not all sedimentary rocks form in water - there are some beautifully preserved fossils formed in volcanic ash deposits. However, I think you are trying to convince yourself that fossils are evidence of a global flood, which they are not. Fossils vary greatly in age and distribution and testify to the great age of the Earth and provide evidence of evolution, not creationism/ Noah's flood etc. To contend you original point, many fossils do form in water borne sediment.....how long to you imagine it takes for an animal to be covered in sediment, that sediment to be covered over, by many hundreds or thousands of meters of sediment, to be compressed, chemically changed form organic to inorganic material, for this sediment to be uplifted (there are fossils on Everest for instance, from the bottom of the Tethys Ocean no less) and weathered away to be revealed? A few thousand years or many millions? Answers please on a postcard....
@@roydodds3693 Evidence 1: Fossils of sea creatures high above sea level due to the ocean waters having flooded over the continents
We find fossils of sea creatures in rock layers that cover all the continents. For example, most of the rock layers in the walls of Grand Canyon (more than a mile above sea level) contain marine fossils. Fossilized shellfish are even found in the Himalayas.
Evidence 2: Rapid burial of plants and animals
We find extensive fossil “graveyards” and exquisitely preserved fossils. For example, billions of nautiloid fossils are found in a layer within the Redwall Limestone of Grand Canyon. This layer was deposited catastrophically by a massive flow of sediment (mostly lime sand). The chalk and coal beds of Europe and the United States, and the fish, ichthyosaurs, insects, and other fossils all around the world, testify of catastrophic destruction and burial.
Evidence 3: Rapidly deposited sediment layers spread across vast areas
We find rock layers that can be traced all the way across continents-even between continents-and physical features in those strata indicate they were deposited rapidly. For example, the Tapeats Sandstone and Redwall Limestone of Grand Canyon can be traced across the entire United States, up into Canada, and even across the Atlantic Ocean to England. The chalk beds of England (the white cliffs of Dover) can be traced across Europe into the Middle East and are also found in the Midwest of the United States and in Western Australia. Inclined (sloping) layers within the Coconino Sandstone of Grand Canyon are testimony to 10,000 cubic miles of sand being deposited by huge water currents within days.
Evidence 4: Sediment transported long distances
We find that the sediments in those widespread, rapidly deposited rock layers had to be eroded from distant sources and carried long distances by fast-moving water. For example, the sand for the Coconino Sandstone of Grand Canyon (Arizona) had to be eroded and transported from the northern portion of what is now the United States and Canada. Furthermore, water current indicators (such as ripple marks) preserved in rock layers show that for “300 million years” water currents were consistently flowing from northeast to southwest across all of North and South America, which, of course, is only possible over weeks during a global Flood.
Evidence 5: Rapid or no erosion between strata
We find evidence of rapid erosion, or even of no erosion, between rock layers. Flat, knife-edge boundaries between rock layers indicate continuous deposition of one layer after another, with no time for erosion. For example, there is no evidence of any “missing” millions of years (of erosion) in the flat boundary between two well-known layers of Grand Canyon-the Coconino Sandstone and the Hermit Formation. Another impressive example of flat boundaries at Grand Canyon is the Redwall Limestone and the strata beneath it.
Evidence 6: Many strata laid down in rapid succession
Rocks do not normally bend; they break because they are hard and brittle. But in many places we find whole sequences of strata that were bent without fracturing, indicating that all the rock layers were rapidly deposited and folded while still wet and pliable before final hardening. For example, the Tapeats Sandstone in Grand Canyon is folded at a right angle (90°) without evidence of breaking. Yet this folding could only have occurred after the rest of the layers had been deposited, supposedly over “480 million years,” while the Tapeats Sandstone remained wet and pliable.
I know you said you wanted it on a post card which meant short and not explained fully. There are many more things the bible that have found to be true over the years and will continue to be proven by atheist scientists. Have a blessed week.
I love the talk ! But I am not sure I can believe myself that dinosaurs were on the ark
You would only need 2 of the dinosaur kind and they could (probably would) be young and small enough to fit.
They would not have to get the largest ones on the ark, therefor the largest Dino’s would have died in the flood with everything else.
First there has to be an Ark.
The arc was obviously a TARDIS with a much larger volume inside. It explains Noah's age and his ability to gather the over 5 million species we estimate to exist and. It also explains his magical staff that parted the red sea and
@@stephenjohnhopkinson8096" Noah? Parted the Red Sea?" "Forget it, he's rolling."
You realize that Noah’s ark was 4,300 years ago and dinosaurs existed 65 million years to 170 million years ago 🤦♂️
It's quite simple, 7 days in God's time is different to 7 days in human time. People who have NDE's always say that time feels different on the other side. One day could be billions of years or more. This always made a lot of sense to me
@talak3544 ah my goodness, are you being serious?
@@hihosh1
"The dead know nothing at all" Ecclesiastes 9:5
@user-fc7hh2ie4k well yes, but that is if you are living and trying to communicate with the dead. But that's very different to what we're talking about here. Regardless I can't believe you hypocrites, shame on you. People actually say outright that Heaven and God exists and you turn yourselves into knots trying to disprove them
@@hihosh1
The plain truth of the statement in Ecclesiastes 9:5 has nothing to do with the living attempting to contact the dead, it means exactly what it says. The dead don't know anything. Psalms 146:4 says the same thing "His spirit goes out, he returns to the ground; On that very day his thoughts perish."
Ecclesiastes 9:6 goes even further
"Also, their love and their hate and their jealousy have already perished, and they no longer have any share in what is done under the sun."
Love and hate are emotions on opposite ends of the spectrum, so not only are the dead incapable of thought but feelings as well. This truth Biblically eliminates the possibility of any afterlife.
Shame? Is that what you said, shame? For understanding and spreading what God has inspired? No, I am the opposite of ashamed. Belief in God and his written word is exactly why this truth is so important. The lie about what happens to the dead has caused more suffering and wasted more time around the world than any other. Whole cultures obsessed with pleasing dead relatives or spending what little they have on lavish ceremonies for the dead. Or God dishonoring practices like Halloween. All because they believe a lie that is not taught in the Bible. A lie started by Satan when he told Eve "you positively will not die".
Belief in an afterlife is in no way required to believe in God, in fact to please him it is key to listen to his inspired word. Merely professing belief in God while ignoring what he wrote, that would be hypocritical.
This is also no denial of heaven, those with the heavenly hope are resurrected (restored to life by God), there are no dead in heaven they are very much alive.
Please don't listen to people who dream or hallucinate or lie for book sales. Listen to God's word.
@user-fc7hh2ie4k I'm sorry you can't grasp the fact that you, the soul, don't die. Those in Heaven are alive, so when these people meet their loved ones, they are meeting their living souls in Heaven. If you can't understand that then I pity you
Is there sound explanation for dinosaurs , large meteorites impacts , wandering stars ( planets ) galaxies, nebula, supernovas , any clear explanation for that in the biblical text??
2:30 "I've got twelve years of college. I've got six letters after my name. I do not make guesses. I make educated guesses."
I've never seen more obvious jealousy of academia and intellectual pursuit in my entire life. These people DESPISE you if you use your brain to any degree that makes their entire worldview collapse. I mean, I don't blame them--if I felt threatened to the degree that evolution threatens Creationist beliefs, I'd attack it this obsessively and insecurely too.
Well, when you start from the position of the earth being 6,000 years old.
“It’s not about the evidence” welp, that says it all folks.
Who needs evidence if you got the word of god XP
@@xandersmith263 I know right? Lol
4:50 How would there be light on day 1, when the sun and stars only came by day 4?
I enjoyed this presentation. As a more mature adult, I can recall numerous things that turned out to be wrong, but were scientific consensus. Quite a few in just my lifetime.
@Brad: You've been brainwashed into thinking that science explains everything, when it doesn't nowhere NEAR to. Science has become your 'god'. There's only ONE TRUE God and HE IS to be praised FOREVER AND EVER and His name IS JESUS, not 'Professor'.
@@glenturney4750 Science explains what it can. I'm sure you believe and trust science, as long as it doesn't conflict with your religious beliefs. That's just bias, though. All science is the same. It's the gathering and studying of all evidence, the formulation of ideas, the testing of hypotheses, and the submission of findings so they can be tested and scrutinized by others. When other scientists also test the hypotheses, reach the same findings, and cannot debunk the findings, they are accepted as theory, which is the same thing as meaning "The findings work, they're consistent and correct." This applies to everything. It's the same science that led to the understanding of geology, biology, medicine, technology, and everything else scientific.
The thing about creation science, is that it skips every step required to be science. Creation science skips the accumulation and study of all evidence. It only accepts evidence it likes. Creation science skips the formulation ideas and testing hypotheses. It also skips the absolutely crucial step of submitting their findings for peer review to be tested and scrutinized by others. It's absolutely not science at all. Creation science is nothing more than an institutionalized factory of confirmation bias. It's never produced anything, and it's assertions are not consistent, tested or even verifiable. It checks every single box for 'NOT' science. Creation science and everything they say can be summed up with a single word. "Apologetics". And it does it very badly.
@@glenturney4750 you should really be humble like you god tells you to be. You are not supposed to be judge mental by the way.
@ChicagoNorthSide how about covid jack
@@extraSNUFFY: OH, so you don't like anybody warning you when you're doing something wrong? Is that what the apostles did when they wrote the Bible, (God's Word)? They were "judging" people? 'WARNING' somebody when they're on the wrong track ISN'T judging them, it's trying to educate them BEFORE something bad happens due to their going down the wrong track, BECAUSE I DO CARE. It's my hope that they WILL heed the warning and WAKE UP before it's too late. John the Baptist warned King herod about him taking his brother's wife for himself, WHILE his brother was still alive. That's called, 'adultery'.. Was John "JUDGING" king herod, or 'WARNING' him of coming judgement? He was 'WARNING' herod. GOD is the One Judge. HE decides who goes to hell, not me. I just know that the Bible explains what will happen to those who commit certain sins and try to educate them of their errors, before it's too late.
I was taught about the age of the Earth and about the dinosaurs in school, and so it was confusing to me when I first became a Christian and my church was trying to lump all of human history into 10,000 years. I prefer to be in awe of God and the abundance of new, complex, scientific discoveries being made, such as finding new dinosaur fossils every day. Just as God is complex, His creation is also complex.
I prefer truth. But to each there own!
@@CaptainFantastic222 : All true science is in complete agreement with the word of God. The problem is people who make videos like this one have never actually studied the Bible for themselves. When they cannot reconcile certain historical events, due to their lack of wisdom, knowledge., and understanding, they simply make stuff up.
Sort of like a bad detective who makes the crime fit their theory instead of making the evidence prove the crime.
@@wrongfullyaccused7139 dude what you just said is 100% wrong no scientific field supports the Bible. And I challenge you to give me a scientist who clearly shows support for the Bible with true data. And don't give me one of your answers in geniuses clowns. Because they don't do true science. Or any other creationist " scientist". True unbiased scientific results points to evolution, old earth. and not a biblical God that the very word of that monster was written by bigoted superstitious savages. You need to have evidence before you claim something.
If you look 👀 at the dna evidence, mankind has been on the earth only 6,000 years, which proves the Bible timeline. If that is established, then the rest of the timeline is established! If you are have a conflict between your science and the Bible, re-examine the basis of your science. Every day more accepted “ truths and facts” of science are being proven wrong! Most of what we call science is actually religion, based on faith, not facts.
@@glenparker234 : Completely false and in direct contradiction of scripture.
So sorry someone tore out the book of Isaiah from your Bible. That assumes you own a bible though.
In that film he believes that creature died 4300 years ago in the flood, why didn't Noah save 2 of them as well?
You can't just use portions of the book to justify what you say all of it must work or none of out does.
Comedian Lewis Black talked about performing in the bible belt of America. The subject of fossils came up. A guy told Black;
"Fossils, Mr. Black, are the handywork of the Devil".
@George Tanley thanks that totally changed the meaning😂
“All we have to do is think this through.” Prefaced by supposing there were T Rex’s on the ark.
Probably not God told Adam what to bring on the cart and what not to so not all creatures were on the ark
Dinosaur kind so probably something much smaller like the Gila monster or alligator.
You think two of every animal were on a boat
@@isaiah4099 Adam was not the man It was Noah and yes God talks to people even today. Maybe not in the way you are thinking yet it does happen. and T Rex's on the ark ( not a cart) yes ... now if your going to say full grown... no !
@@Reaper666-99 no Fish were not needed on the ark : )
20:40 he says 1 thing i agree with . Separate what we know from what we assume about creation and god too. He makes good sence
"sense"
The Bible is true
@@ScalpNinjaTrader No it isn't. There was no worldwide flood, the Earth and plants on it weren't made before the sun and other stars, the True God isn't the sick monster that ordered the killing of every man, woman and child in Jericho (and the Sun didn't stop in the sky while it happened either)
@@MrHominid2U Your feelings or opinion doesn't change the Bible or who God is. Maybe read the whole story before calling The Desire of the Nations a sick monster.
@@ScalpNinjaTrader Read the whole story. That thing described in the Old Testament isn't in any way a fair and loving God.
Im only 17 minutes in. Has this man heard of radioactive decay? That’s not a “starting point of view” sir, that’s evidence.
Great vid :)
BUT The shark thing with the seaweed ! As someone that is a shark guy ! And lead shark dives a good chunk of my life and has about 15k dives I have a wheee bit of experience with them
Its a test bite what that shark was doing its purely testing what it is that is NOT a shark eating or attacking that seaweed especially the way its moving
This is like throwing a tennis ball for your dog and saying WOW its attacking that tennis ball dogs must love to eat tennis balls
Sadly this is “modern” science lets make a scenario where we can make something work for what we want as results
I can say using that same idiocy they love to eat anchors and buckets and line and metal chain dive suits and old tires and dive tanks and ….
Sharks are curious and have no arms or hands so they use their teeth to sense what it is
Yeah the shark one seemed a little fake 😅
The shark took a bite of the kelp and then came back for a larger bite...that was self evident from the video. Particularly since there were other delicacies in the water ...releasing blood.
Also , there's a good chance that the guy that handled the tuna and the squid had blood all over the kelp when he threw it in the water. So the cap may have smelled like a meat meal.
@@randybonner9870 That would not explain why the shark did not go for those delicacies the first time or why he went back to the kelp on the second pass...bypassing the delicacies for the second time.
I find it awfully convenient that he left off what the shark researchers said happened after the test was all done. I'm betting the shark spit it out but they don't show that. You can't say from this video that sharks are plant eaters because he took the kelp; we don't see what it did with it. For all we know it could have left the scene and used it to bait larger fish or something.
“For in much wisdom is much vexation, and he who increases knowledge increases sorrow.”
Ignorance is bliss yes, but does that mean everyone should be ignorant then?
@Brayton Hougland The original sin ...we ate from the tree of knowledge..apparently it's not good to have knowledge 😕
The sin has been committed. You should seek knowledge but it doesn’t take away the fact that the more advanced we become the more we destroy ourselves and the Earth itself. Blessing and a Curse
@@Emiliocab47 it was the tree of knowledge of GOOD AND EVIL. Really important difference of just “knowledge”
@@Anwelei We should have stayed ignorant ?
Can’t even watch this without cringing….
I don’t even have to watch this and know that it’ll just discredit science and FACTS entirely. Thank you next
As in the days of Noah Fallen Angels not only messed with humans but also Animal life.
Are you serious, Clark?
Exactly ..... "need to separate what we know from what we assume"
it is called the evolution theory but schools, scientists, etc teach darwinian evolution as though it is actual fact for it happening the way they claim it happened
You know gravity, mathematics and physics are just theories that exists in our minds???? But they do exist and we can prove their existence. Your God or heaven is like the idea of Thor, unicorns, vampires, flat earth... You're just imagination.
Theory as in framework. It's not a hunch. Music Theory is a recognized framework. So is evolution theory.
The science of adaption and mutation is used to push speciation.The finch beak will slap and mutate.. But it will be a finch till it's extinction ... Too think it will change to a different species is so unscientific!
@@mr.anonymous7935 Well, then it's going to be a very interesting conversation when you meet "Thor" when your life is over.
@@ryant3600 so you call your deity Yahweh??? Then it will be interesting to see you in front of a jackal like Anubis and then saying, i want expecting this..
6:58 Yes, it looks like the cedar tree that you would find where the story of Job takes place.
Also, the part of animals always reproducing their own kind. Evolution doesn't teach a fish that gives birth to a salamander. It's small changes that start in the DNA. Which through mutation can slowly or sometimes fast(after extinction level events or environmental pressures)start to drift away from the parental animal and if keeps going without the animal going extinct. New species can occur. Look at the two sqeaurls at the Grand Canyon. Or after when the non-avian dinosaur went extinct. Never in the history in the universe did an animal give birth to another animal that wasn't its parent species. You are misleading people, and that's shameful.
There was no denial that speciation occurs. And he never said that one species of animal gave birth to a different one. What he said is we have no proof of a single ancestral dinosaur through fossils, just that we have evidence of multiple different dinosaurs. And they do reproduce to their own kind the ancestral dog could reproduce other animals like it. And we know it doesn't take long for diversification to occur, chickens in particular only need a couple generations. There is no undeniable proof, however, that every living thing came from one ancestor, let alone a chemical soup. We assume because of DNA similarities. He's not misleading anyone, but presenting a Creationist's case for dinosaurs, the only place where there could be a fault is how old the dinos were on the ark. Under his model this isn't misleading anyone.
@@soul-heart there is evidence of ancestors! only lok at the "indoyus" , how do you explain our modern whaleshare part of their genetic code with the fossils of such land-dwelling animals?
LOLLLL! "we know this chart is very scientific. how do we know this is scientific? because it has a bunch of scientific words on it!" LOLLLLLLLLL! can't! 😂
Why do biblical scholars deny Darwinian’s Theory of Evolution but are more then happy accepting the Heliocentric Model eg, Special and General Relativity when God said the following.
Psalm 104:5 He set the earth on its foundations, so that it should never be moved.
Chronicles 16:30 Tremble before him, all the earth; yes, the world is established; it shall never be moved.
Isaiah 40:22 It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in;
Does this not indicate a flat circular stationary Earth?
I just don’t understand this acceptance of an infinite universe with dark matter, dark energy etc.
God made no mention of these things.Also God said he made two great lights. The sun and the moon to rule the day and to rule the night. Therefore, the moon is also a light not a planetoid that one can land upon as NASA claims.
Now I don’t care what the church says. I just know what God said.
So I ask are you paying attention, or are you promoting misinformation?
I believe a reply to my comment is required.
The earths a snow globe but fixed so firmly only god can shake it to make it snow but he can only be bothered in the winter. Oh I forgot we don't have seasons because of the unmoveable earth.
@@truthgiver8286 Please allow me to take a moment to be immensely scientific given my understanding of Physics and Applied Mathematics.
Einstein’s relativity is a magnificent mathematical grab which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to there underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple who ignorant people take for a king. It’s exponents are brilliant men but they are meta physicist rather than scientists.
I hope that was not overly academically for you.
your scientists made their jargon. God made the universe and it's laws. Evolution has been disproved and was never proved. Flat earth has been disproved by pictures and a test involving the horizon. It was years ago I saw that. You don't really need an answer you need a reality check. Also the moon only reflects the sun's light. The bible is God's word not the Church's word.
No its not flat and it dosent say it is
@@rockroll9761 Did you read my entire comment and comprehend what those sections of the Bible say?
What do you mean it doesn’t say that?
Ok what do those sections of the Bible that I quoted say then?
Or do you just believe in science?
Now answer all 4 of my questions without giving me a childish reply.
I’ve always wondered about dinosaurs in the Bible, this video helped a lot, Thank you .
Dinosaurs were invented by 2 men in the late 1800s that were known scam artists. Look it up, there are no dinosaur bones
Dinosaurs existed, and there is proof of that. Why would a Christian dispute a verifiable fact?
@@davidmuth4571 lol when that individual said that dinosaurs were made up, I started laughing… if that’s the case, how can you dig up evidence ? Lol the bones Are the evidence!
Pretty cool, huh? 😁👍
How did it help you ?
Agreed. Parasaurolophus is indeed the best dinosaur.
Must be a Greek dinosaur.
Nah nothing beats the leviathan lol
May fav is Spinosaurus :)
@@danielledomville835 yeah, that's a pretty good one too 😂
I'm a Christian and I believe in the Bible. But I also believe in science. And science tells us that humans and dinosaurs never existed at the same time. We also know from studying ancient cultures that calendars were different. Why do we believe that in the beginning of time a day was the same as it is in modern times? Keep in mind that the Bible is written metaphorically. And was also translated several times over the years.
The change in the atmosphere post flood was definitely conducive to smaller creatures, including the descendants of dinosaurs. 💁♀️
The largest air breathing creatures on earth live in water and must be incredibly efficient, considering the time they can hold one breath.
What about him telling that according to the Bible the Earth existing BEFORE the SUN??? Yes the Earth is flat n the Sun n Moon rotate horizontally around it
@@sonny.9998 I sent you a reply the other day but don’t see it; must not have posted? 🤷♀️
@Chandller Burse well clearly water was invented first before anything else really eehhh maybe the third thing. It existed before light.
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
@Chandller Burse earth was never flat, I just find it interesting that water existed before light. flat earth is just a jewish psyopes designed to make christians look stupid.
There has never been any evidence of a global flood.
But the question of how Christians, which I am, should feel about dinosaurs, is truly trivial. The priorities should be three-fold: working out our salvation, witnessing for Christ, and preaching the cross. The rest of it is good knowledge but insignificant. I have always said and will continue to do so: You can be saved without the Old Testament but not without the New. The former merely helps you understand latter better.
Actually, Jesus was in the Old Testament, too. Gen 1:26, Micah 5:2, Isaiah 7:14, Daniel 7:13-14, just to name a few. So for me the Old is just as important as the New.
@@eltorro9411 important, yes, but not vital for salvation. And what just came to mind is the transfiguration. If you recall, Peter was putting Moses and Elijah (both Old Testament figures) on the same level as Christ. God said hear Jesus. This is not a slight upon those two men just clarifying. And we can do this all day, but the Old Testament is not more important than the New. The former only helps us understand the latter. It's a foreshadow but Moses, Elijah, and the rest of the Old Testament saints won't get you into the Kingdom of God. That's the bottom line.
Lastly, as Jesus said in John: You search the scriptures- the Old Testament- and in them you think that you have eternal life, but they only testified of me. So salvation is not in the Old Testament but in him whom the Old Testament spoke of.
@@eltorro9411 for you it is important and it's okay if you feel that way. Just understand, the blood of sheep and goats (Old Testament again) won't save you. Plus, Old Testament, i.e., the Law won't save you because it's works, and by works shall no flesh be justified in God's sight. That's scripture. Of course, we should strive to keep the commands, but only Jesus can keep them at the level that God requires. We cannot do that and definitely not all the time. You have to keep them externally and internationally. One sinful thought and we are lost if our salvation was based upon us and us alone. It takes the blood of Jesus to justify us
Your opinion is true. And that it also validates that people chooses what they want to believe. But the existence of dinosours just can't be ignored. Because it will prove the historicity of the bible.
True.
"Do fossils come with labels "Hi, I'm 65 million years old."?"
Carbon dating has entered the chat.
carbon dating is not accurate.
@@BaseK59 either is basing everything off a book written thousands of years ago.
I would suggest Listening to people who actually know what they're talking about about dinosaurs This guy's opening statements Are not close to being true
I once had my employer ask ,why wasn't there any mention of dinosaurs in the bible.well I told him because it's a book about God's plan of salvation not a book about dinosaurs or salamanders.
You should have said I haven't read the Bible since the evidence is in it. Read Job 40:15...Read about Behemoth and Leviathan...clearly dinosaurs. By the way, as said in this video the term dinosaur was not coined until the early 1800's. The term dragons is found throughout the Bible as are other terms denoting creatures of that nature.
@@alantasman8273
This is our biggest problem within the church, many don't know how to answer questions regarding the contents of scripture.
Then it would be a good idea not to tread into areas and make pronouncements about things the bible doesn't cover. Like dinosaurs. Like evolution.
@@donlimoncelli6108
Name an animal that has a tail like a cedar, that eats grass and it's strength is in it's loins? This can only be a saurapod.
@@technicianbis5250 Not sauropods. They ate mostly leaves and mosses, definitely not grass.
Any of us ever compared the description of Leviathan to Godzilla? It checks the list
It does. If so I'm happy about it
Lol Godzilla isn't real tho he was a creation of a Japanese comic artist I believe
@@Mistfall254 GTFO here with this negativity. At least Rodan, Kong, and mothra were real.
@@wavesofzen5383 Wha how was that negative I was just saying what I heard from a few yrs back sheesh and if that was sarcasm try 2 b a lil bit more humorous with it lol.
@@wavesofzen5383 you don't have the authority to tell some to "GTFO".
Wouldn’t carnivorous animals eat the other ones faster than they could reproduce as soon as they got off the ark?
Yes
no they would have eaten them on the arek
Not if God told them not to bro
@@mikegamikega ah, of course! Now it all makes sense lol.
@@jasonparra5383 dont disrespect the most high god your heavily creator
3:45 Fully formed creatures reproducing after their own kind? Offspring are not exact replicas of their parents, and after a really, really long time they eventually turn out completely different.
I love how these videos are titled with a directive. Please don't think for yourself because here.
Like your text books and teachers did for all of your school years. Here is evolution the answer to where we came from and everything came from don't look any further and God aww he is just a myth. I'll take creation over evolution!
Dinosaurs also died out because they had "terrible bad luck", according to the latest study from the University of Edinburgh. the asteroid, due to the consequences of which they became extinct, crashed into the Earth precisely at the time when the giant reptiles were most vulnerable due to rising sea levels and increased volcanic activity.
Then Homosapiens did as well.
Ever heard of the Astroid that hit Earth 65 Million years ago?
@Chandller Burse hahahahaha that's what evolutionist insist to fit their narratives
@Chandller Burse dinosaurs is a reptiles not a bird
@Chandller Burse birdssss? bwahahaha
It has been written and documented that Jesus rode a T Rex!
Hmm and this description of a supposed sauropod dinosaur makes no mention of it's extremely long neck.Odd how the biblical scribe failed to notice that detail.And when it comes to Leviathan I would love see a creation "scientist"explain the physics and chemistry behind underwater fire breathing
behemoths like the brontosaurus
Isn't there underwater volcanos?
@Arely Munoz You're missing the point. Biologically, it is almost entirely impossible for an organism to produce fire from its stomach/mouth on land or in the air, let alone underwater...
Man came 65 million years after dinosaurs roamed the earth.
Volcanic activity can recycle anything present on the earth’s crust. The question is how did the iridium get into the crust?
The real question is how did a universe just form and life just form. On one side you have nothing in to something no design yet what is formed shows design. On the other side you have a creator with design and forms everything by speaking it in to existence. Hum I choose the latter!
@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice But the "there is at least one god" hypothesis also has "nothing in to something no design", as the god or gods also have to come from somewhere for the comparison to be fair and equal.
@@leftgrrl No God has been and always will be. I know that is hard to take in with our finite lives yet we see creation with design. As far as animals are concerned they do not have a sole they do not know wrong from right just as small children do not know right from wrong small children learn and grow animals do not they have instinct behaviors children grow in knowledge and until they reach the age of accountability are safe and will be taken to heaven yet animals do not have this ability ( not to say we can't teach animals they just don't understand wrong from right). Yet I do believe animals will be in heaven. Now the "big bang" There has to be something to stat with there is no space no partials to collide so where do these things come from in the evolutionary beginning? Yet if there is a creator that has been and always will be that is not a problem.
One of the strongest arguments against this was left out.. what about carbon dating? Wish he had explained how that can be disregarded.
Only so much he can pull out of his behind in one go
I have been studying and working in science for 50 years and I have never heard of any but 2 of the theories for dinosaur extinction that he mentioned.
LOL science nowadays is that broad that your statement basically doesn’t mean anything besides that you’re very proud of it 😁
@@alexmsc5753 So you only approve the science you agree with?
@@Lalo-dh8xq no but I’m saying that working in “science” doesn’t mean that you know everything science or knowledge related
He could do anything from biochemistry to Neurology 😂
Back then we just called them Dragons the word dinosaur wasn’t invented until later.
This guy is one of the funniest standup comics I have heard in a long time.
There is no god
I know right 🤣🤣
Very beautiful idea of getting our young generation back to God by discussing on Dinosaurs. Salude to you and team.
That's insane. Why would you feed our youth with this nonsense when you can be teach true science that actually matters.
@@Jurassicalpha266 "True" science. Yea, right. If you don't like the topic, then just move along. Otherwise why are you here? Carrying the torch of secularism and atheism?
@@douglasagriswold6118 because paleontology is true science. Have you ever received in education? Because if you did you would not have typed you're reply. If you believe what this guy is a spouting you belong in a cartoon show.
@@douglasagriswold6118 got nothing to say back just proves you don't know what youre talking about and can't back it up.
Oh you are too funny - You say it's "true" because you have bought into the "trueness" of it. I'm sure we're all more educated here than you could even imagine. Yet here you are, attacking like a blind dog, anybody who disagrees with your "worldview". Oh yes, it's "true" because you BELIEVE it to be "true" and you just suck up the secularist science like grape kool-ade. LOL. Maybe you should take Doug's comment and just move along and find somebody else to bleat on and attack. We don't care WHAT you believe. As is the truth, the PAST is gone and all you've done is take the 'pieces' of a wild jigsaw to fit together that makes a case that you won't be responsible for your actions one day. Bye bye!
I imagine it was quite difficult getting pairs of each type of dinosaur 🦕 onto Noah's ark. How did he/she/they stop T Rex from attacking the Bronotosaurs ?
I think the common apologetics say that God calmed the temperaments of animals so attacking each other didn’t occur. Of course that makes about as much sense as humans and dinosaurs living together
before the noa's floor, nobody was meatarian, they don't eat meat, which mean they don't attack each others.
@@WolfCat787 science would disagree with you
@@wsmc14 how it so? did scientist found the stomatch of dinos that confirmed they ate meat?
@Pom Kim No, definitely not. I'm thinking T Rex was either vegan or fruitarian
There's just one little thing wrong with his analogy about The Flood on sealife, nowhere in Genesis does it say that Noah took sea life aboard the ark, just land animals, creatures. So if by what he says is true about all sealife was buried during The Flood, how did the sealife repopulate the Earth after God made the water recede, seeing as how Noah DIDN'T take any sealife onboard the ark,nor was any provision or accomodations made during construction of the ark to include all sealife on the Earth before The Flood?
this is the weirdest thing I ever saw. and I actually watched all of this video. I couldn't stop watching.
It's a total train wreck lol
People who believe weird things don't read the Bible because God created the the heaven and the earth and than man.
@@bryanorozco8248 Actually, it's pretty interesting. Carbon dating is such an imperfect thing. I like thought provoking ideas
@@andrewwhite5176 Actually, there is nothing in the bible that can be proven. It's not only imperfect, but a complete waste of time.
@@andrewwhite5176 CD is Very accurate until about 50K years. It's only theist that twist the truth when they keep leaving that last bit of information out.
People are not just ignorant they’re willingly ignorant.
One can only be willfully ignorant that is what ignorance is; ignorance is having all of the evidence and facts available to you but ignoring them.
Especially creationists and flat-earthists
@@tontonbeber4555 Really it's much harder to believe in evolution the creation .... come on a big bang of nothing to into everything? Really My friend you have a lot more faith then I do if you believe that!
@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice Evolution have been proved a lot of times (even with viruses and their variants ... or maybe you think the covid has been created at the same time of the animals, and just did hide in the ground up to now). Moreover, evolution and creation are not necessary incompatible. I do believe that God created the universe, that means that he created every law of the universe, from speed of light to mass of the neutrino, including evolution of living species. If it's a fact and it works very well, that proves that it's the decision of God (I follow the principle of fine tuning). But of course to admit that, you have also to admit that your books are outdated by the progress that we, the creatures, have made, following the wish of God. So I do believe in God and admire his creation, and I worship him by doing my best to understand what he does, but I absolutely don't use the bible for that purpose.
@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice The Big Bang theory addresses the reason for the expansion of the universe, not it's creation. Good luck with science as you move forward in life.
This is an insult to paleontologists and geologists. Downright outrageous.
I have a question? What is the evidence that all animals were created on the 6th day? What is the evidence that all the earth was repopulated by animals from the ark? What is the evidence that snakes talk? U cant just point to the bible and say, "because it says it right here." The requirement of evidence has to work both ways. We cant talk about Genesis "like we have it on video tape." All the answers he gave are based on the divine events of the bible, which we have no evidence of. If we're gunna have this debate we have to be honest about the undisputable facts.
In Africa a host of wild animals die daily. Scavengers make sure that they will never form fossils. There have always been scavengers. To find an intact fossil means something unusual happened
Funny there are no fossils of extant animals like cats, dogs, humans, etc. In the same rock layers as dinosaurs. Predation doesn't explain not one single Dino bone anywhere
That's an interesting thought and I had made a comment on another thread saying I wonder how he explains Neanderthals?
You are an idiot have you wondered why real dinosaurs that died millions of years ago have left their fossilized bones
Right, the bones you don't see doesnt exist..
because bones that doesn't exist are eaten bones. Where else would they possibly be? Under ground?? Pff!
@@solmoman Bones aren't all that edible. We have lots of bones to study, even Neanderthal bones. But no Dino bones, all are fossilized.
Just stumbled on this; funniest thing I've seen for ages!
Because what he said was a lie? I’ve studied both secular science methods and creationist views. If you’re able to be honest, this actually holds truth and makes sense. But that would mean you have to admit there’s a God and we are in need of a savior. Is that why you choose to mock it?
@@TarantulamanNC There is no 'creationist views' that carries evidence that disagrees with science. And there is no such thing as 'secular' science. Science is just science.
@@rexsterling7346 The researchers who rely on the methodological naturalism, rule out God from scientific research as ”supernatural”, because they have chosen atheism for the basis of their researches. Thus the choice does not happen on scientific grounds but based on the world-view i.e. on a religious standpoint.
All scientists believe in something which they choose as the starting point for their researches. The object of faith need not be a deity. It can be whatever worldview -based presumption. Naturalistic science is based on the belief that there is no God, or that God can not influence on the physical world. Naturalism sets its own religious baseline as a criteria for what can be considered science. It dogmatically holds the fallacy that it has the privilege to science. That’s why it does not honestly participate in scientific discussions with those who have a different baseline. This kind of abstinence is against the scientific principle of self-criticism.
The evolution theory, favored by atheists, is in its pivotal parts based on imagination where the laws of physics and genetic realities are bypassed and replaced with assumptions.
Unlike the natural scientific study which leans on methodological naturalism, creationism is based on critical rationalism which adheres to all principles of science. Critical rationalism sees that absolute objectivity is not possible and that the boundary between natural and supernatural is not in all cases possible to strictly draw. Unlike naturalism, creationism rejects no theory for purely ideological reasons.
We should all get jobs with this guy. We'd be rich.
You just have to be really good at manipulating,lying, and pretending to care.
Turned it off after a few minutes when I noticed my brain going into atrophy.
All Videos can do that... yet if you study the facts you will find this video of understanding! So what is your belief ... Evolution, no creator? if so Why are there Laws in nature? Explain DNA? If you are an evolutionist tell me how the DNA of a dino changes in to the DNA of a bird? I love to understand this if you could explain it.
The fact that many creatures don't need to eat for over a year without any bad effects is also compelling.
?? where do you get this stuff?
@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice look at different snakes and other cold blooded animals much?
@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice snakes and bears and other things that hibernate or have a slow metabolism
The ignorance is unbelievable. Not all us Christians are this oblivious!
What do you mean by that.
@@Validsharky Catholics are Christians who do not believe the hogwash this guy is teaching. They do not believe in a young earth, dinos and humans living together. And they believe in evolution.
@@rexsterling7346 oh ok
If all animals were plant eaters at one time, the herbivores would soon overpopulate the earth, exhaust their food supply, and starve to death in mass. Carnivores are actually necessary to keep a healthy balance.
You’re making an assumption that the herbivores have to reproduce at that point in time. With no death and no disease, the existing herbivores did not need to replenish their numbers and they would have kept living in harmony.
@@WadeWeigle , You’re the one making an assumption that defies nature. Now it’s animals that lived hundreds of years?
@@davidgardner863
Jesus said we will be as Angels marrying no one, same for dinosaurs. No sex required we won't feel like it.
@@technicianbis5250 , Looks like you added a whole new chapter to Genesis.
@@davidgardner863
"looks like you added"
Mathew ch 22 v 28 to 30 sunshine. I added nothing, just quoted. 😀
I watched the entire video, but feel his position lost traction at this the 6:18 mark. He reads JOB 40:15-19 which clearly states “he moves his tail like a cedar”. Key word being “moves” Then at 6:18 the speaker states the behemoth “has” a tail like a cedar. So therefore it must be an animal much larger than a hippo or elephant. “Moving his tail like” and “having a tail like” are two entirely different things. The presenter asks at 6:29 “when people read through gods word are they actually paying attention?” I feel the presenter needs to ask himself that same question.
Holy christ does he misrepresent what science has shown to be true. Wow. The mental gymnastics it must take.
Well science today is so much better. No mental gymnastics today amongst secular scientists:
1. We can't define what a woman is.
2. We are told to believe all women.
3. Men can have babies.
4. There are infinite genders.
5. Abortion is good because a baby in the womb isn't living.
The presentation full of scientific evidence for the truth in Bible. Thank you!
@@jounisuninen yeah. Ok.
Amazing Dinosaur Facts
Origins of the Word Dinosaur
Sir Richard Owen
What is the origin of the word dinosaur? I ask many people this question and surprisingly most people don't know. One of those little known dinosaur facts is that the word dinosaur is a relatively new word in the English language.
The word dinosaur literally means "terrible, powerful, wondrous lizards." The word became popular after biologist and paleontologist, Sir Richard Owen coined the term "Dinosauria" in 1841. The word dinosaur derives from two greek words (deinos) "terrible, powerful, wondrous" + (sauros) "lizard".
So what would a person prior to 1841 call a giant, powerful, wondrous lizard if they saw one? The answer to that question is really quite obvious especially if we look back into the historical record for evidence of giant, powerful, wondrous lizards. Can you Guess?
Another amazing dinosaur fact is that every culture had names for these giant, powerful, wondrous lizards.
Explorers described them, historians wrote about them, and they have been romanticized in many cultures throughout the world. Can you guess yet?
Find out the answer! Watch the movie: Forbidden History.
So what were dinosaurs called prior to 1841?
There are some theories that have been promoted as dinosaur facts. Many people have been taught, as fact, that the dinosaurs died off millions of years ago when a meteor hit the earth, but can this really be proven?
Did a meteor really wipe out the dinosaurs?
I was taught, along with just about everyone else, the above theory, but there is evidence, a lot of it, that indicates that dinosaurs and man have always existed together.
After my own 10 year study of the issue, I am fully convinced that dinosaurs have always existed with man.
O.K. enough suspense. The most common English word used to describe terrible, powerful, wondrous lizards was...Dragon. That's right, Dragon. Many other names were used as well. To learn more about this fascinating subject start with the historical evidence.
You might be wondering...Were did all of the fossil dinosaurs come from then?
There is a simple logical explanation for this as well. Use the hyperlink above to learn what really happened to the dinosaurs or you can Watch the FREE movie: Forbidden History to see more evidence.
Dinosaurs do not at all exist. They are just a propaganda used to support the lie of the big bang theory.
They used to be seen as lizards now they are assume chickens even though bone and fossil are 2 different things and noone has ever found a real dinosaur bone and there are literally 0 on display in any museum on earth... It other words they don't exist.
No link
Dinosaurs were yet to be discovered by the time the bible was written by humans. That’s the most logical explanation why there’s no mention of dinosaurs in the bible. People didn’t know any better back then.
@@voodoodiecast dinosaurs were never discovered because they aren't real. If dinosaurs where real that would mean evolution is real. If evolution was real all animals would be homogenous because the animal at the top of the food chain is the food chain. That means either everyone would be dinosaurs or all animals would be flying humans with gills. Neither exist now which show evolution is fake. As the bible shows we were not here for millions of years which means dinos couldn't have existed. Besides that fake fossils and bones are different. Bones decay ess than hundreds of years, and fossils are just imprints basically moldings as all the dinosaurs skeleton on display are all made of plaster casting. There are no real dinosaur bones. It's all a lie.
My dear, dragons in every culture were beings who fly!
If man and dinosaurs co-exist, then where is the event that dinosaurs attacked human beings or any being tamed in any actual historical events??
Last I checked, 65 million years is A lot more than 6000 years ago
Haha .So how many dinosaurs did Noah fit into the arch?
@@sereanaduwai8313 none. God killed the dinosaurs for their sins!
Then again, if that is the case then god also enjoyed being sodomized by Nurgle in 2020
haven't watched the video completely, but are you suggesting that dinosaurs were on the ark?
how then do you explain the asteroid?
A tyrannosaurus knocked on my door yesterday. I was prettified. Till he said. “Have you found Jesus” 🙂
@@Jurassicalpha266 No they did not. Dinosaur fossils contain soft not fossilized tissue.
@Jouni Suninen it's fossilized through mineralization. It degrades instantly when we extract it. Once again you are proving you know nothing about science. Go back to school. I received an education why do I have to educate you? And don't get you're information from Dr. Mary swieitzer. Because she said evolution is still true
Felt like this video wasted some of my life away.
It at least got some laughs out of me
Yes the very basis of faith is belief without evidence. 1st mistake is asking a preacher about dinosaurs, 2nd mistake is this man saying he makes “educated” guesses.
@@whiterock1865 ok?
@@FlintGiven ha ha, not you, the speaker! I could only sit through about 3 minutes of it.
@@whiterock1865 speaker?
Indeed, Behemoth of the version says so! It's one of them big badass tree top eaters with a tale the size of a ceder tree!
Behemoth means greatest of creatures!
Well, it’s unfortunate that the people who wrote the Bible didn’t know anything about dinosaurs lol
Kelp aren't plants they're algae. In any event the samples were dropped into the ocean within seconds of each other and I'd argue the smell of the tuna and squid inodiated everywhere and the kelp was the largest with parts moving around in the water current. If you showed the rest of the video the shark ate the tuna and squid. I'm not sure what point you're making here but sharks have been found with parts of buoys in their stomachs among other weird things. A whole lot of time spent on a point of nonsense.
Nope, the shark had ample choice between the kelp and other delicacies and chose the Kelp twice forgoing the other delicacies. Believe your lying eyes on this one.
This was SO interesting and answered so many questions!!
Question: Did dinos exit when humans existed? No.
Did it let u know the TRUTH about the Earth existing BEFORE the SUN according to the Bible. Yes the Earth is flat n the Sun n Moon rotate horizontally around it.
Vickie. I’d like to recommend another program that is also interesting and also answers a lot of questions about dinosaurs. It is similar to this video in terms of historical and scientific accuracy.
It’s called, “The Flintstones.”
Thank you SO . I’m already familiar with that program, yet I found it lacking after a few years. 😊
I saw a raptor outside my building the other day ! Praise Jesus !
What you talking about Willis?
I've been to the Ark exhibit. It is massive... that's an understatement. The engineering is stupifying and gives a visual experience as to how complex it was and how everything was laid out. Veterans get in free on Veterans Day. No matter what your personal beliefs may be, it is truly amazing to see and I would encourage everyone to go see it.
How do you know how the ark was laid out ? Did anyone find the plans ? Did anyone find the ark ? Extraordinaire Claims Require Extraordinaire Evidence…. Where is the evidence ?…..there is none, it’s just a fairytale..
Forget the topic..do u realize that the Bible has the Earth existing BEFORE the SUN.????? So why do they say that the Sun was in existence b4 every planet 😊??? Lie..thé Earth is flat n the Sun n Moon rotate horizontally around it.
Why would I waste my time and money on an unture, uneducational experience. Money better spent for Disney Land, at this their stories are somewhat believable.
@chandllerburse737 The problem with this Ark is it proves its impossible for it to ever existed because they had to add things to get it survivable for human occupation. The Bible is full of falsehoods and in essence it just breaks down to being a doomsday cult waiting for the end of the word. Did I hear a trumpet? Is god coming? Oh wait it's just a marching band.
@Chandller Burse Its purpose wasnt to bring people to Christ, its purpose was for further education for people who are already saved. It wasnt to expand the audiance but to entertain the existing one.
And well duh, it would jab at evolutionary beliefs. They are designed with the intent at man's attempt to over throw God as the supreme creator with chance and probability
Wow this was very fascinating and intriguing! Since I was a kid I was always obsessed with dinosaurs and such. My first dream was to be a paleontologist. Oh and my favorite dinosaur has always been hands down the Stegosaurus. (I've always been that different kid that wanted to stand out. lol) That particular dinosaur always intrigued me as to how he looked. Especially with the armor plates on his back and the knives on his tail. So cool! And my theory was the extinction was caused by the major change in the climate after the flood. The Earth was just to drastically changed to where they couldn't survive and eventually they died off. God Bless!
I suggest you read science books if you’re interested in the dinosaurs. Religious books come to a conclusion first and then try and bend the facts into their presupposed conclusions.
Science doesn’t give a monkeys about whether it fits into religious books, it just follows the evidence.
Hi Ross, how is Rachel doing?
@@curbroadshow the extintion of dinosaurs is explained at length in science books.
@@ronniecox109 Yep.
You can use science and believe in God.
Facts. I hate when people think it's God VS science, instead of realizing science SHOWS us God
Wisdom is with God
How to fit a square peg in a round hole...
There are seashells all over Arizona, but no one believes it's because of the flood.
Also, if it was because of a flood, then the water levels would have only risen, not swept sea shells from the ocean, hundreds of miles inland into Arizona, nor would living muscles have traveled hundreds of miles to reach Arizona, during the fairly short time of the flood.
The belief shells made it hundreds of miles just because waters rose, requires the absence of logic, reason and education.
And still only the mega tsunamis could have moved them so far.
It's like arguing with a flat earther.
How did the Kangaroos, wombats, etc., get from Australia to the Ark then back to Australia again? Why only marsupials in Australia which evolved first and before the continent split from Pangea?
Actually is very shallow all the way there . So during the ice age they could have walked there .
@@albusai LOL hopefully you're joking. The South Pacific was shallow enough for animals to walk from Australia to Africa or Asia? ROFLMAO.
the details are irrelevant. the more important question is what do you have to show for the validation of atheism as it's done nothing but breed weakness since it's existed? we're supposed to believe a fake book built everything but the truth is impotent?
@@TheGovernmentputcrackinmyblunt What details are irrelevant? The detail that the South Pacific has never been wadable? Who's talking about atheism? What fake book are you talking about? What truth is impotent?
@@MrHominid2U minor details don't matter to omnipotence. if you were correct you would have been strong historically, atheists cannot possibly be so inferior that they can be right about the nature of existence and still be utterly embarrassed since time existed by those with false beliefs.
you guys literally complain about having to work in a capitalist society and have no spiritual drive to face evil. I take pretty much nothing you guys say seriously because every other marker of integrity really doesn't exist in structure of physique, face, soul.
you say words that you think are objective but any time you go into a competitive arena like combat, art, building and maintaining nations you literally always lose under the smallest of pressures.
that weakness comes entirely from your worldview and inability to let god use you to act which denotes your body isn't designed in his image in form or function which is why athiests tell bad stories, don't move well like a human, and come up with rationalizations why these are points of evolution and not willingly making yourself far from perfection.
So, I assume, that when he says he's got 6 letters behind his name, and that implies he has a some sort of doctorate. In what? Theology doesn't count, because that's like having a doctorate in fairytales.
Have you received a Doctorate? Why do you feel you have to belittle someone to whom you disagree with? Just debate the facts. have a open mind to learn. of course if you have a closed mind and don't want to know or learn something then I fully understand your name calling because you are ignorant.