Alternating series remainder | Series | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @BP7777L
    @BP7777L 10 років тому +30

    Khan Academy is the best because can help people from the future.

    • @nimilpatel2642
      @nimilpatel2642 3 роки тому +5

      watching in 2021 🥶🥶🥶

    • @thatfo3364
      @thatfo3364 3 роки тому +2

      @@nimilpatel2642 watching 3 days after you 🥵

    • @shayanbajwa3593
      @shayanbajwa3593 2 роки тому +3

      @That Fo watching in 2022 year after you :)

    • @dankmango_
      @dankmango_ 2 роки тому

      Hello I am from the future

    • @jackkarson1015
      @jackkarson1015 2 роки тому

      @@thatfo3364 watching in october 2022

  • @matthewjames7513
    @matthewjames7513 10 років тому +19

    For those of you who are curious about how he proved R4 < 0.04.
    He grouped the terms in pairs again (-1/36 + 1/49) + (-1/64 + 1/81) ... and realized that this term must be negative because each pairs sum is negative.
    Then he realized R4 = 1/25 + that negative number. This meant R4 < 1/25. Hence R4 < 0.04.
    He also realized that R4 couldn't be negative because he proved earlier that R4 > 0.
    Very clever Sal! Great work!

    • @TheDavidlloydjones
      @TheDavidlloydjones 10 років тому +3

      Matthew,
      That's all very well, but it rests on a crucial assumption, that the infinite series that has been bracketed has an even number of terms, and that the last terms in the series is 1/[some odd square].
      Suppose this isn't true?
      Suppose, instead, that R4 is -1/36 +(1/49 - 1/64) + (1/81 - /100).... Then we are faced with the question of whether all that bracketed stuff, call it r5, which is clearly positive, is more or less than 1/36. Wey-yull, it's the series ~1/209 + ~1/426 +~1/757 ... All positive numbers, and sadly, not in any fixed proportion to one another...
      :-)
      Any thoughts? I think David Hilbert said something like "The craziest damn things happen when you mess around with infinities."
      Cheers,
      -dlj.

  • @yadpreetcheema4806
    @yadpreetcheema4806 6 років тому +12

    2:30, quick maths

  • @beees3499
    @beees3499 5 років тому +6

    Thanks, great video.

  • @TylerRich-bw9zh
    @TylerRich-bw9zh 10 місяців тому +3

    tyhak you mista kahn, i will now pass caculus

  • @MuhammadAli-hk4cn
    @MuhammadAli-hk4cn 8 місяців тому

    What a nice explanation! Thank you!

  • @ghlegend195
    @ghlegend195 9 років тому +4

    This is a crazy way to think about this. Just, take your truncated derivative's value and that's your answer? Why doesn't my teacher explain it like this? Is there a point i could miss on the free response for doing this? (I'm in AP Calc BC, exams are coming, and I've been studying over Spring break :P )

  • @jerryhymytang8859
    @jerryhymytang8859 2 роки тому +1

    I've got a silly question here.. what if I put parentheses around -1/36 and 1/ 49 and so on so that every brackets after 1/25 would be negative? How to prove then that the absolute value of the sum of those brackets is smaller than 1/25 ?

    • @Andrew_NYC
      @Andrew_NYC Рік тому

      can't put parenthesis around -1/36 and -1/49 because it changes the values; it's - (1/36 - 1/49). You have to distribute the negative and it'll become - 1/36 + 1/49 in brackets (a negative value) which u add onto 1/25. Since the value inside the brackets is negative, you're still subtracting from 1/25 and the bound is still < 0.04.

  • @jamiegarcia7863
    @jamiegarcia7863 10 років тому +3

    Khan Academy PLEASEEEE DO LINEAR PROGRAMMING FOR ALGEBRA II IM STUCK AND THERES NO VIDEOS!!!

    • @ghlegend195
      @ghlegend195 9 років тому +15

      You went quite a distance for a request like that, seeing as how you're in a Calc 2 subject comment thread.

    • @Andrew_NYC
      @Andrew_NYC Рік тому +2

      @@ghlegend195 some high schools in NYC give linear algebra after AP Calc BC